Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1926
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:14:00 -
[151] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:
I would rather attack convoys, in low sec and null and get fun fights out of it.
That sounds great. Too bad that wouldn't happen.
We know what would happen. The big alliances would convoy in such massive numbers that Tidi alone would preclude a fight, and the smaller groups would couldn't do that wouldn't it it AT ALL.
The end result is the exact same as today, NO FIGHT for you, but this (nerf logistics) way would just mean more power for the already powerful, large , entrenched null sec interests.
|

Stonecrusher Mortlock
University of Caille Gallente Federation
129
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:16:00 -
[152] - Quote
Tippia wrote: GÇ£put in the effortGÇ¥ and GÇ£be deliberately stupid and inefficientGÇ¥.
what effort? training a JF and using a small part of your brain?
I DO logistics, did them at the start and do them now, i also hunted convoys as well.
I know fully how little effort is required to safely move items around null sec it is.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14395
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:21:00 -
[153] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:what effort? You should know GÇö you're the one saying they're not willing to put it inGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
981
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:22:00 -
[154] - Quote
This is another utterly moot discussion. The reason we took the CSM for null and will keep it in perpetuity is so that chucklefuk outsider-looking-in ideas like this don't get implemented. It will never happen.
All this thread will be good for is the usual "making clueless hisec scrublords demonstrate their cluelessness", which is admittedly fun, but more and more pointless as we "nullsec zealots" continue our inexorable ascendancy. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
2050
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:27:00 -
[155] - Quote
OP, these supply lines you want to attack - they're analogous to the supply lines of an army on the march, invading territory, yes?
Nullsec is not a forward advance army that is fed by hisec. Nullsec is home base. There shouldn't be a need for a supply line to attack in day to day life. One should be able to support oneself on home turf.
Ownership of nullsec is broken until it is able to do so.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Stonecrusher Mortlock
University of Caille Gallente Federation
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:45:00 -
[156] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:
I've just spent 3 pages discussing why i think the current situation is far from ideal. Dishonest claims that JFs are "invulnerable" don't advance the discussion at all though.
There not "invulnerable" but it takes MASSIVE errors for you to die.
Go and ask your alliances Logistic wing how often they really die, and if they tell you its to anything other than the random ganking of there NPC corp JF alt, fire them as there completely incompetent and should not hold that office.
My friends 7 year old plays eve for 8 months now and safely supply's his corps 37 members with supply's in NPC null sec. You know how many times he has died doing it in the last 4 months scene he started? NONE.
A 7 year old can out smart every pirate and gate camp alliance member and leader in eve, how? Checking local, and not going afk in less docked, and NPC corp. tell me if a 7 year old can do it how often do you think the people that do it every day and know every trick in the book and every way it can be safely done for there alliances die?
SO, is it to easy? YES.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1928
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:46:00 -
[157] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:This is another utterly moot discussion. The reason we took the CSM for null and will keep it in perpetuity is so that chucklefuk outsider-looking-in ideas like this don't get implemented. It will never happen.
Damn it Varius, at the last "Secret Society for the Destruction of High Sec and Elevation of Null" club meeting we all (you included) agreed to not advertise our devious plans vis-a-vis our perpetual domination of the CSM (and eventually CCP, CCP Rise was just the 1st!!@!), yet here you are, advertising our devious plans. I mean damn, man, we, talked about this already.
Anyways, see you next meeting on Monday , which we will un-ironically be holding in meeting room 143 at Jita 4-4. BYOB as usual. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1928
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:48:00 -
[158] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:Malcanis wrote:
I've just spent 3 pages discussing why i think the current situation is far from ideal. Dishonest claims that JFs are "invulnerable" don't advance the discussion at all though.
There not "invulnerable" but it takes MASSIVE errors for you to die. Go and ask your alliances Logistic wing how often they really die, and if they tell you its to anything other than the random ganking of there NPC corp JF alt, fire them as there completely incompetent and should not hold that office. My friends 7 year old plays eve for 8 months now and safely supply's his corps 37 members with supply's in NPC null sec. You know how many times he has died doing it in the last 4 months scene he started? NONE. A 7 year old can out smart every pirate and gate camp alliance member and leader in eve, how? Checking local, and not going afk in less docked, and NPC corp. tell me if a 7 year old can do it how often do you think the people that do it every day and know every trick in the book and every way it can be safely done for there alliances die? SO, is it to easy? YES.
What is that beeping noise? Oh yea now I know, I just haven't heard my bullshit detector make THAT much noise so much since monoclegate that I forgot what it sounds like.
|

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1135
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 17:49:00 -
[159] - Quote
The pure mad in this thread, and the grammar/spelling errors it is causing, is epic. brb, getting more popcorn. CCP has no sense of humour. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8026
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:03:00 -
[160] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:And you would need to defend these items in transport, and people would wish to attack them.
And interesting game play in born.
We have a lot of titans, hope this helps. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

baltec1
Bat Country
6697
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:04:00 -
[161] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:baltec1 wrote:
With or without jump freighters we would be importing just about everything because we simply cannot make it out in null.
And you would need to defend these items in transport, and people would wish to attack them. And interesting game play in born.
PL dump their supers onto your convoy. Now what?
Simple fact is, the convoy cant work these days due to the numbers out there and we will simply revert to using carriers. If you stop us from using carriers as freighters then smaller alliances in the harder to get to areas will be crushed and it will be that much harder to attack the big powerblocks. Convoys have had their day. |

Danni stark
424
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:07:00 -
[162] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:PL dump their supers onto your convoy. Now what?
be a man, cyno in some heavy interdictors and have at them. Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

Stonecrusher Mortlock
University of Caille Gallente Federation
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:13:00 -
[163] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Gwenywell Shumuku wrote:Really beeing patient here, but what makes you think that this discussion revolves around your personal EGO of living in Venal? I don't really care. I don't even care if you think i know or don't anything about EvE, if i would have wanted to i would have posted with my MAIN no?  Its not about EGOs....try looking past that and coming back to interesting disussions. Try listening to people WHO LIVED IN THE TIMES YOU SPEAK OF AND KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. Its nothing at all to do with ego, I am simply saying what used to happen and why your idea would hurt this game.
You said you fully lived in the middle of someones space with out JF, and a good industry system and constantly got fights?
Compared to now? |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1115
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:15:00 -
[164] - Quote
Tippia wrote:More useful nullsec industry slots benefits highsec players by giving them more free highsec industry slots. oh hohoho, we think we're funny, do we, tippia? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8026
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:16:00 -
[165] - Quote
Also all this would do is force fleet sizes to get smaller, reducing the scale of fights. Pubbies might consider this a good thing because THE BLOB is the excuse du jour for not leaving the safety, comfort and convenience of hisec but ultimately interest dwindles and people stop playing. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1464
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:20:00 -
[166] - Quote
Danni stark wrote:baltec1 wrote:PL dump their supers onto your convoy. Now what? be a man, cyno in some heavy interdictors and have at them.
You first. Let us know how that works out for you, though. Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

Yula Khardula
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:22:00 -
[167] - Quote
Andski wrote:Also all this would do is force fleet sizes to get smaller, reducing the scale of fights. Pubbies might consider this a good thing because THE BLOB is the excuse du jour for not leaving the safety, comfort and convenience of hisec but ultimately interest dwindles and people stop playing.
I too, hunger for node death and blueballs. |

baltec1
Bat Country
6698
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:23:00 -
[168] - Quote
Stonecrusher Mortlock wrote:
You said you fully lived in the middle of someones space with out JF, and a good industry system and constantly got fights?
Compared to now?
The days of RUST were good ones and NC were even more farmable than IRC, CFC and HBC have ever been. Mind you back then the death of a super was something special. |

baltec1
Bat Country
6698
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:24:00 -
[169] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:
You first. Let us know how that works out for you, though.
DBRB loved it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
6698
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:25:00 -
[170] - Quote
Yula Khardula wrote:Andski wrote:Also all this would do is force fleet sizes to get smaller, reducing the scale of fights. Pubbies might consider this a good thing because THE BLOB is the excuse du jour for not leaving the safety, comfort and convenience of hisec but ultimately interest dwindles and people stop playing. I too, hunger for node death and blueballs.
Havent had node death for years now. TiDi is by far the best thing to hit EVE after they added the megathron. |

Danni stark
425
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:28:00 -
[171] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:You first. Let us know how that works out for you, though.
but i am just one man, i can't cyno myself in.
edit: nor can i fly a heavy interdictor for that matter... Ice Mining Skill Plan. |

Stonecrusher Mortlock
University of Caille Gallente Federation
130
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:29:00 -
[172] - Quote
Tippia wrote:March rabbit wrote: - 0.0 industry needs a buff - logistics needs a nerf
And that's strange that out CSM representatives only speak about 1st half of the problem. And completely ignore 2nd half.
Nah. It's just that the former makes the latter a moot point.
And we are still left with the main point of this thread, no way to effectively stop the resupply of your enemy's.
THAT was the only point of this thread, You can not effectively run a interdiction on supply's, if thos supply's HAVE NO TRANSPORT TIME.
The fact these supply's make there trip all most instantly is the problem.
Make it so Cynos cannot be lit on grid with Station's, Outposts, POS's, or gates.
THAT solution would do a WORLD of good for eve, the amount of PVP created by that change would be massive. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
14396
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:30:00 -
[173] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Tippia wrote:More useful nullsec industry slots benefits highsec players by giving them more free highsec industry slots. oh hohoho, we think we're funny, do we, tippia? No. Just obvious. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.-á |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3781
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:36:00 -
[174] - Quote
It is so tiresome to see people arguing to not make x,y,z changes because it will hurt the small corps living out in null space. There is no small corps in null. Only coalitions. If you can point out a non-gimmick corp living in null that relys only on itself for logistics, you are lying.
The arguments to not make changes because it will hurt the little guy and only help the big guy is ridiculous and full of holes.
|

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1896
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:39:00 -
[175] - Quote
If you move industry to null-sec, then there needs to be the possibility to sabotage enemy production facilities or raid them or temporarily disable or impair them. Else you just have the same situation as now minus jump freighters with all production being done in next to 100% save space. Though that would need to be balanced properly, too, lest production stays in hig-sec if the cost of sustaining hom production is greater than the time and jump fuel costs. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
1464
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:40:00 -
[176] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:It is so tiresome to see people arguing to not make x,y,z changes because it will hurt the small corps living out in null space. There is no small corps in null. Only coalitions. If you can point out a non-gimmick corp living in null that relys only on itself for logistics, you are lying.
The arguments to not make changes because it will hurt the little guy and only help the big guy is ridiculous and full of holes.
Define "relies only on itself". While we're at it, define "small." Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

DerArt1st
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:46:00 -
[177] - Quote
It needed like 5-6 years until ccp noticed that lowsec is somewhat broken even when everybody told them so i wouldnt hope for a change for the next years in that matter. |

Spurty
V0LTA Verge of Collapse
868
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:49:00 -
[178] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:It is so tiresome to see people arguing to not make x,y,z changes because it will hurt the small corps living out in null space. There is no small corps in null. Only coalitions. If you can point out a non-gimmick corp living in null that relys only on itself for logistics, you are lying.
The arguments to not make changes because it will hurt the little guy and only help the big guy is ridiculous and full of holes. Define "relies only on itself". While we're at it, define "small."
Show us the CORPORATION with no blues or an alliance that has held for some time (long enough for logistics to be a pain monthly) and currently still holds SOV and we'll show you your 'small and reliant on itself' definitions. You may have issues here. Marlona has already explained why.
--- GÇ£If you think this Universe is bad, you should see some of the others.GÇ¥ GÇò Philip K. **** |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
983
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:52:00 -
[179] - Quote
I'd venture that the vast majority of logistics is done at a corporation level, so bringing in blue-donut crying is a non sequitur. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
3781
|
Posted - 2013.05.29 18:56:00 -
[180] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:It is so tiresome to see people arguing to not make x,y,z changes because it will hurt the small corps living out in null space. There is no small corps in null. Only coalitions. If you can point out a non-gimmick corp living in null that relys only on itself for logistics, you are lying.
The arguments to not make changes because it will hurt the little guy and only help the big guy is ridiculous and full of holes. Define "relies only on itself". While we're at it, define "small." Relies only on itself is pretty self explanatory. Small of course depends on the individuals point of view.
"Don't nerf the titan jump bridges because it will nerf the slot 9 crew hull modifier!"
See:
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |