Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Xeldrak
Khanid Spirits Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:14:00 -
[391] - Quote
One word: Awesome!
But now give us the amarr one that will crush this puny minmatar-construct 
gotta got - change my skillplan |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
153
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:19:00 -
[392] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:Ya this is just what we need lets make Battle Ships even more useless and unwanted out side of pve.  These ships from the EVEkill Top 20 think you are talking crazy.
3 Abaddon 52906 4 Armageddon 25130 5 Maelstrom 24284 6 Tempest 22567
But hey I am sure the 175kEHP Abbadon is very scared of a Ship with 25% the Tank that it can hit.
Really if anyone should be scared of these things it should be.
1 Drake 141384 2 Hurricane 85968
These guys which can get hit by those weapons and can not out run the New Battlecruiser. |

Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:33:00 -
[393] - Quote
Raid'En wrote:Jack Dant wrote:[quote=CCP Phantom]as are most of the lower-tier cruisers and frigates. Personally, I'm worried CCP is reinforcing the tier concept with these ships, when you should be removing it. well it's normal given they all have nice tech2 variant, et a noob will never have a reason to test those little things, given he will quickly have a better option. that's sad, but it would need a total revamp of all ships to make this better, and i don't think a good result is possible... It's not the T2 variants, it's the tiers: cyclone vs hurricane, prophecy vs harbinger, etc.
Tier 1 and 2 BCs have the same skill requirements (to fly effectively), and, once fit and rigged, have very similar costs. But the tier 1 BCs have less slots and fitting, so they are much weaker and generally only flown by noobs, or by people trying to look like noobs to get fights.
It would be so easy to give the tier 1 ships the extra slots and PG/CPU to become competitive, and recover 4 perfectly good ships. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
132
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:37:00 -
[394] - Quote
Buzzmong wrote:Blimeh, a dev response after the first couple of pages, it's like the old days again  I'm just curious what role these new BC's will fulfil. The idea is awesome, but the idea behind titans and motherships (supercarriers) was also Awesome(TM) and look how that turned out. EvE doesn't need awesome ideas when ships are added, it needs roles which ships are designed to fill otherwise you end up with the problems we've got now, ie supercarriers and to a similar extent, T3 Cruisers (jack of all trades, but oddly also extremely good at said trades, like the Tengu). If this idea with the BC's using next size up weapons works out nicely, would CCP be willing to take the idea and apply it to Destroyers? They *really* could do with a lot of love and have needed it for many years now.
depends all on the stats and slot layouts but i wouldn't be suprised it will be used as the historical battlecruiser we know ; seek out and destroy anything that isn't fast enough and smaller ( cruisers; other bc s , industrials ) but fast enough to escape anything larger and stronger
butwe need to wait for the stats to see what they will bring more to the game I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

inexistin
Rubbish and Garbage Removal Atlas.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 20:45:00 -
[395] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless?
One name: Ferox. And don't tell me about blasters; at least not until winter comes. |

Rawls Canardly
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:51:00 -
[396] - Quote
Looking forward to the change, but I'm of the camp that believes that destroyers need both a big buff (turns slower than a cruiser and tanks like a frigate? Come on.) And more options. this could be game changing nonetheless |

Ulair Memmet
ORIGIN SYSTEMS
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:52:00 -
[397] - Quote
The ship looks badass. I'm looking forward to the other ones 
How about sentry-boni for the gallente :) Not like the sin, i mean REAL damage and tracking. And a drone-scooping range bonus to make up for the immovability muahaha
Looking forward to the next blogs |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
80
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 22:29:00 -
[398] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote: It's not the T2 variants, it's the tiers: cyclone vs hurricane, prophecy vs harbinger, etc.
i was only quoting the CRUISER stuff, not the BC stuff. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 22:57:00 -
[399] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Thank you for all your replies and feedback. The majority of the posts show excitement! Roughly a quarter of the posts I have read (and I have read them all) had a positive attitude but were a bit hesitant. I saw less than 5% of the posts that considered this idea as being really bad.
Most of the hesitation results from lack of solid numbers so far as you haven't seen the stats of the new ships or how exactly they will work. Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless? Won't the new battlecruiser have a too strong tank, making them overpowered? Won't the tier 2 battleships become useless? What about the Gallente ship, will it at least this time not get the short end? And how will tracking work, a fast ship with large weapons? We saw more questions and read them all!
CCP Ytterbium is working on a new Devblog with more information about the Tornado and its brothers in arms.
Some of us are maybe going fast for conclusions but heh, after all in what gallente pilots are concerned, it's not like if we're stuck with something close to useless because of the very specific roles our ships can field and represent a tiny portion of what Eve combat has to offer, I guess we play more often than those specific occasions happen.
Yes I'm really curious to see what you guys have cooked for hybrids and gallente pilots in hope we'll be happy and surprised. Between Caldari and Gallente you'd make a huge percentage of players happy I guess. |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:17:00 -
[400] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Rip Minner wrote:Ya this is just what we need lets make Battle Ships even more useless and unwanted out side of pve.  These ships from the EVEkill Top 20 think you are talking crazy. 3 Abaddon 52906 4 Armageddon 25130 5 Maelstrom 24284 6 Tempest 22567 But hey I am sure the 175kEHP Abbadon is very scared of a Ship with 25% the Tank that it can hit. Really if anyone should be scared of these things it should be. 1 Drake 141384 2 Hurricane 85968 These guys which can get hit by those weapons and can not out run the New Battlecruiser.
This numbers realy show nothing.
1.) Did they get poped in the attempt to do PVE? i.e. In a wormhole/in a sactum/in a Incursion/when rating?
2.) Did they get poped in a pvp engagment before they fig out sniping BS's get scan locked and pind down before they can go to warp again?
so on and so on.
Secondly I would realy like to know how you know the new BC's are only going to have 25% of the tank and cant out run a BS? |

Haulin Gneiss
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:36:00 -
[401] - Quote
can you say BC6? |

Haulin Gneiss
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:36:00 -
[402] - Quote
derp dupe |

Haulin Aussie
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 02:32:00 -
[403] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical
50million isk that Hurricanes will tear these things to shreds. |

bloodlust priest
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 03:02:00 -
[404] - Quote
so now there is really no reason to fly t2 ever again |

Fenris Nihilus
Southern Comfort Armaments Shadow of xXDEATHXx
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 05:17:00 -
[405] - Quote
bloodlust priest wrote:so now there is really no reason to fly t2 ever again They said it has over sized guns but sacrifices other assets like tankage.... so no still a reason to fly t2. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
623
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 05:26:00 -
[406] - Quote
To all the pro-battleship pilots who hate on caps, support the cap nerf and are not fond of a t3 BC that can push a BS's dps:
BS tears best tears. |

Poor Lazarus
Applied Creations The Fendahlian Collective
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:03:00 -
[407] - Quote
Behold! INTARNET SPACESHIPS ARE BACK! |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
167
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:11:00 -
[408] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote: This numbers realy show nothing.
1.) Did they get poped in the attempt to do PVE? i.e. In a wormhole/in a sactum/in a Incursion/when rating?
2.) Did they get poped in a pvp engagment before they fig out sniping BS's get scan locked and pind down before they can go to warp again?
so on and so on.
Sorry I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is because those 4 Battleships are the most well known Fleet Battlships in the game.
I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest are the fleet standard for PvP and are used heavily in large scale Warfare. which incidently is where they get such a high kill record compared to well everything else in the game below them.
Rip Minner wrote: Secondly I would realy like to know how you know the new BC's are only going to have 25% of the tank and cant out run a BS?
I do not for sure but your Avg Battlecruiser has 35-50k EHP. I do not see why these would be any different. I never said they could outrun a Battleship, sure I have no doubt they could run. If only running = winning. They have less tank and since most Battlecruisers currently have 6 Guns and smaller Drone bays it is a good bet that they will do less DPS if they can even fit the largest guns like those Battleships can.
I am willing to bet that the Abbadon, Maelstrom and Co are not going anywhere soon. |

Alex Logan
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:52:00 -
[409] - Quote
this sounds interesting, we can fit the big howitzers and insta pop noobs up in hisec... |

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:55:00 -
[410] - Quote
Ulair Memmet wrote:The ship looks badass. I'm looking forward to the other ones  How about sentry-boni for the gallente :) Not like the sin, i mean REAL damage and tracking. And a drone-scooping range bonus to make up for the immovability muahaha Looking forward to the next blogs
I want hybrid fixed and do some proper damage with large blasters, not another drone boat.
|

Vorpheus
Three Sword Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 09:07:00 -
[411] - Quote
i already thought about siege battlecruisers, nice thing... but what next? player controlled fighter bomber i would love... stealthbomber with capital weapons, weeee...
but back to topic... i just realized... another gankweapon... hm, that tornado would be overpowered, if it could have 8 1400mm artilleries... doubt thats gonna happen...
but anyway... winters gonna be epic |

Gods Coldblood
The Ankou Raiden.
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 09:28:00 -
[412] - Quote
Ok, well,
i had to check it wasn't April..
It isn't!!!!
I also took precautions and pinched myself,
it hurt, so I'm not dreaming..
So this isn't a joke?
err
hmmm
Ok
EVE PVP Video's : Channel |

charmed knight
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:57:00 -
[413] - Quote
so, Drakes with cruise launchers, again borring Fleet fights: 100 x Tier3Drakes + 30 logistics VS 100 x Tier3Drakes + 30 logistics :facepalm:
 |

Commander Grace
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 11:43:00 -
[414] - Quote
How about that dev blog?
need moar details... liek naow!! |

Jose Black
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:10:00 -
[415] - Quote
Suicide ganking buff anyone? |

Joshke
Epsilon Inc STORM.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:10:00 -
[416] - Quote
Everybody so excited about large guns ? What about your tank, think how long you can stay against a soloing Rapture (lol) or a 2x Thrashers, which pop you puppy in seconds. And how you large guns will be missing any smaller targets. |

TheButcherPete
StoneWall Metals Productions Rebel Alliance of New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:35:00 -
[417] - Quote
Xython wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. Not emptyquoting, just bringing this back up. Please, for the love of pete, make the Gallente one not suck. Our standard BC is worse in literally every way to the Minmatar BC.
I'm Pete :D Hybrid/Drone beast Gallente ftw
Also Xython, I love you too. |

Knug LiDi
N00bFleeT Numquam Ambulare Solus
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 14:32:00 -
[418] - Quote
Traiori wrote:Long story short: All those C1 POS towers that we couldn't get battleships to are going down this winter...
guess getting t2 cruisers or t3 cruisers was too hard ?
If only we could fall into a woman's arms
without falling into her hands |

Kaaletram Lothyrawir
Ignus Astrum The Veyr Collective
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 14:35:00 -
[419] - Quote
Wow just what the Gallente need is another glass cannon  |

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 15:21:00 -
[420] - Quote
This would be epic if ships like the Hurricane didn't already outdamage certain battleships while still tracking small ships without any trouble...
Pinky |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |