Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
419

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Community team is committed to bringing you all the latest information on what we have in store for you in the coming winter expansion and beyond.
Game design is putting the final touches on new ships...and here's the concept overview of the the first one. The ship everyone has been waiting for....the Tornado. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

Shadowsword
The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
At last, a new ship you can use for everyday pvp without needing to be a multibillionnaire. :)
And it would be even better with an actual link. :p |

Myxx
Atropos Group
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
i love how you dont have a link. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1010
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
I endorse this product and/or service. And the new Gallente BC is radical. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
314
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Heard on our skype channel: [10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
419

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Link up :) CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

Marlakh
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nice! |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
97
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Winmatar |

ORCACommander
Astral Synthetics
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'll take a dozen. 3 of each |

Myxx
Atropos Group
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
oversized guns? win. |
|

ChromeStriker
The Shadow's clutch
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
O_O - Nulla Curas |

White Tree
XxBroski North Reloaded Federation NinjaGuldDotxX. Elite Space Guild
474
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
O_O |

Naamah Celeste
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Good heavens... lol.
Now, this is going to be interesting. |

Karanth
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
Is it just me, or does it pretty much look like a Myrmidon with fins? I like new ships, just, uhm. |

Louis deGuerre
Malevolence. Void Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
I predict a summer nerf incoming  FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES ! |

Vincent VanOgh
Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:I endorse this product and/or service. And the new Gallente BC is radical.
I hope by "radical" you mean "actually works" |

Charles37
Ichiban Industries
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
Will this be a Tech 2 BC (i.e. require BC V)? Any other skill prereqs that we will need to train as well? Or is this information being saved for another dev blog? |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
107
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:44:00 -
[18] - Quote
I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please! |

Ender Black
Lone Star Exploration Narwhals Ate My Duck
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:45:00 -
[19] - Quote
YES.  The Pod Goo Podcast http://www.podgoo.com
Pod Goo also publishes editorials, guest blogs, and guides for free. -áJust email [email protected] your material. |

Pak Narhoo
Knights of Kador
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nice, going to be interesting times.  |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
271

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
Charles37 wrote:Will this be a Tech 2 BC (i.e. require BC V)? Any other skill prereqs that we will need to train as well? Or is this information being saved for another dev blog?
All information regarding the slot layout, fitting requirements and bonuses will come out in a separate blog for all the ships  CCP Navigator - Lead Community Representative |
|

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
178
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
LIKE
Also
ALL HAIL VERTICAL BATTLECRUISERS - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
LOVE THIS NOW. |

Shadowsword
The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
Able to fit L guns but not enough pg for L repair stuff, I suppose that means a cruiser-like powergrid with a role bonus to weapon powergrid. And fast cap recharge, or the amarr one will run dry fast.
Sound very nice, BS-like dps and range without massive plating or active tanking. But I wonder if they really have a place in the present meta-gaming. Against another BC gang built around Hurricanes/Drakes, L weapon tracking might be too much of a problem to be compensated by a bit more dps. Against the current Abbadon blobs, the BS's buffer tank would give them an overwhelming advantage.
We'll need to do some math once the stats are known, I suppose. But I predict the shield-based ones (and Tornado in particualr) will be overpowered because the very low PG requirement of large sheld extenders and autocanons will still allow them to have a respectable passive buffer. |

Mekhana
Spiritus Draconis
206
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. |

StarLite
Aurora Polaris The Babylon Consortium
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vertical ships FTW! My first reaction: OMG OVERPOWERED! But I guess it will be balanced in some form or way :) |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
126
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ahah OH WOW
This is pure awesomeness concentrated in one single spaceship. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:49:00 -
[28] - Quote
this is basically the best ship ever thanks |
|

CCP Diagoras
C C P C C P Alliance
85

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
Well, this looks fun. CCP Diagoras John Turbefield |
|

Whiteknight03
WESAYSO Industries
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:49:00 -
[30] - Quote
I'm so looking forward to something that can fit torpedos and actually get in range to use them! |
|

ovenproofjet
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
I just did a little dance
TOTALHELLDEATH IS FINALLY HEREEEE!!!!!!!
<3 CCP |

Efraya
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Narwhals Ate My Duck
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:49:00 -
[32] - Quote
All hail our new glass cannon overlords.
WSpace; Best space. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:50:00 -
[33] - Quote
i can't tell you how much fun I will have with this |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
when i heard the ship got nerfed to a BC i was like " well this is bullshit"
then they said it would use battleship guns, then i was like ".....im listening"
this new concept is interesting and i am looking foward to see what comes out of this, next blog on this better come out very soo.... i mean quickly. |

Aydjile
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
look at dat fukken kat |

TheButcherPete
StoneWall Metals Productions Rebel Alliance of New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
YES!!!!!!!!!!!! CCP, keep this stuff up and you'll gain so many subs that people will call the Jita Rioters "f'king c*unts"
+1 to the Devteam :D
GÖŃ Pete |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
133
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:51:00 -
[37] - Quote
Gimee Gallente, Amarr ones. NAU |

Karak Terrel
As Far As The eYe can see Chained Reactions
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[38] - Quote
OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!!! |
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
271

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[39] - Quote
Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love.
The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one  CCP Navigator - Lead Community Representative |
|

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
107
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[40] - Quote
I have to say, that you say it will be easier for newer pilots to get into but then it requires battleship sized guns?
I'd say that's interesting because the major issue at the moment is that T2 Large Guns take WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more training than training the Battleship skill.
But, hey - I'll take it - the Noobs can suffer at my awesomeness.
But now I have to train T2 Large Projectiles ;p
NOSTRO AURUM NON EST AURUM VULGI |
|

ChromeStriker
The Shadow's clutch
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[41] - Quote
My skill que just changed....
- Nulla Curas |

Lord Meriak
Amarrian Retribution
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[42] - Quote
I can see alot of cap issue's with 2 races..
thow gal really really on drones. amarr need a buff and soon |

Grideris
Fleet Coordination Command Fleet Coordination Coalition
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[43] - Quote
This ship intrigues me, and I wish to know more.
Also, want pictures of the new Gallente BC. |

Gary Goat
XDC-UK THE R0NIN
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:52:00 -
[44] - Quote
This winter expansion is shaping up to be somthing EPIC! 
Cant wait to see what the Gallente one will look like. Hopefully it will be a blaster ship that actually works |

Jack bubu
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
52
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:54:00 -
[45] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:
I have to say, that you say it will be easier for newer pilots to get into but then it requires battleship sized guns?
I'd say that's interesting because the major issue at the moment is that T2 Large Guns take WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more training than training the Battleship skill.
But, hey - I'll take it - the Noobs can suffer at my awesomeness.
But now I have to train T2 Large Projectiles ;p
I heard there are T1 Large turrets too |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
79
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:54:00 -
[46] - Quote
so large guns and speed tanking... seems logical for minmatar, but will the others size be able to make up ? with the minmatar tracking and basic speed it's a good things, but the others have not that :/ but i get why you call the tornado a drake killer, given his monstruous signature radius...
but concerning the others 3 ships, are these all picked from the player made design or not ? |

Traiori
Silverwing Explorers Kamikaze Project
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:55:00 -
[47] - Quote
Long story short: All those C1 POS towers that we couldn't get battleships to are going down this winter... |

Kasidis
Noble Company
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:55:00 -
[48] - Quote
Is it going to have updated graphics model like the maller and scorpion? |

Lord Okinaba
Zandathorn Industries
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
Is it a drone boat?  |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
25
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:55:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
change of pants next to computer... check
|
|

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
133
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:55:00 -
[51] - Quote
Waiting for the Gallente and Amarr ones. |

De'Veldrin
Norse'Storm Battle Group Intrepid Crossing
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:56:00 -
[52] - Quote
Hell yeah |

Daren Knol
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:57:00 -
[53] - Quote
Yes, yes, yes, freaking yes. New ship, new love. |

ovenproofjet
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:57:00 -
[54] - Quote
Also what sort of price range are the hulls being targeted at? 40-50mil seems reasonable to me... |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
78
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
There's one important thing you missed about the ship.
It's
V E R T I C A L . |

Dennie Fleetfoot
EVE University Ivy League
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:58:00 -
[56] - Quote
Please let the Gallente one kick ass, especially with this hybrid buff we've heard about... |

14 Day Trial
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:58:00 -
[57] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:I endorse this product and/or service. And the new Gallente BC is radical.
you look younger...
|

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:58:00 -
[58] - Quote
Gimme big guns gimme webz and put me it that ship XD
Also lol @ boomstick i almost choke. |

Amsterdam Conversations
Cheesecake Starshine
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:58:00 -
[59] - Quote
Mr Hurricane, your days are counted. |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
107
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:59:00 -
[60] - Quote
Jack bubu wrote:Bloodpetal wrote:
I have to say, that you say it will be easier for newer pilots to get into but then it requires battleship sized guns?
I'd say that's interesting because the major issue at the moment is that T2 Large Guns take WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more training than training the Battleship skill.
But, hey - I'll take it - the Noobs can suffer at my awesomeness.
But now I have to train T2 Large Projectiles ;p
I heard there are T1 Large turrets too
Meh, generally over-priced for Meta size BS guns - but you bet your ass those guns are going to fly up in price.
See you on the Market PVP.
NOSTRO AURUM NON EST AURUM VULGI |
|

14 Day Trial
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 14:59:00 -
[61] - Quote
Kasidis wrote:Is it going to have updated graphics model like the maller and scorpion?
It would be uneconomical for them to release them using the old texturing system. I'd give you a 100% of course.
:P
|
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
54

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:00:00 -
[62] - Quote
Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships. |
|

Mekia Buelle
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:01:00 -
[63] - Quote
I really love that design and cant wait for the other battlecruiser pics but i`m curios if there are plans to get a new tier of battleships something more "efficient' then the marauders? cos those puppy's have been in the game for a VERY LONG TIME and they didn't get any love whatsoever |

Arien Omnicron
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:01:00 -
[64] - Quote
Down goes hurricane supremacy. 2 things Seriously we need info now on the amar BC unless you have some insane bonus for cap recharge or cap use reduction i dont see how its gonna work
Also Amar BC with tach 2's lol bc sniper 250km |

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
T3 Battlecruisers with the winter expansion? Awesome...Battlecruisers fitting Battleship guns? AWESOME!!! Tornado now a Battlecruiser instead of Battleship? Meh. But thats ok because all four factions are getting new T3 ships of pure awesomeness!
I can't wait...this will be AWESOME!!! Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |

Galega Ori
Perturbed Institution
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:02:00 -
[66] - Quote
So we can expect that in the future a new destroyer will be released that can fit medium turrets right?  |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
97
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:02:00 -
[67] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
I think he meant to make the ship competitive with the other racial equivalents, not to make it look pretty.  |

David Xavier
The Scope Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:03:00 -
[68] - Quote
The Tornado is absolutely awe inspiring, I just hope that the Gallentean one will not be A BIG AMORPHOUS AMOEBA with engines strapped on it. |

Karak Terrel
As Far As The eYe can see Chained Reactions
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:03:00 -
[69] - Quote
Traiori wrote:Long story short: All those C1 POS towers that we couldn't get battleships to are going down this winter...
Was exactly my first thought. I hope it is below the mass limit. |

DuKackBoon
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
TheButcherPete wrote:YES!!!!!!!!!!!! CCP, keep this stuff up and you'll gain so many subs that people will call the Jita Rioters "f'king c*unts"
+1 to the Devteam :D
GÖŃ Pete
You? On the forums? MADNESS.
Also I endorse this product/service. |
|

Arien Omnicron
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:03:00 -
[71] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships.
Yea but what about price ranges. If the goal is to get new players into the game then this BC is gonna have to set at 50 mill or something. I can foresee starting prices to be inflated |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
131
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:04:00 -
[72] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:T3 Battlecruisers with the winter expansion? Awesome...Battlecruisers fitting Battleship guns? AWESOME!!! Tornado now a Battlecruiser instead of Battleship? Meh. But thats ok because all four factions are getting new T3 ships of pure awesomeness!
I can't wait...this will be AWESOME!!!
Tier 3 NOT T3
|

Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
43
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:05:00 -
[73] - Quote
I died and went to haven... 
Now, give us one last thing this winter:
ALLOW US TO CHANGE CHARS WITHOUT LOGOUT
thanks |

Mekia Buelle
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:05:00 -
[74] - Quote
Arien Omnicron wrote:CCP Soundwave wrote:Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships. Yea but what about price ranges. If the goal is to get new players into the game then this BC is gonna have to set at 50 mill or something. I can foresee starting prices to be inflated
There going to be inflated like the rest of the "new" stuff for a very long time. :) |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:06:00 -
[75] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships.
not if the spaceships you like are highsec freighters, orcas, or the like
wootles |

Nathan Jameson
Talocan Vanguard Talocan United
46
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:06:00 -
[76] - Quote
CCP SCREWS ITS HEAD ON STRAIGHT???
Details at 11! |

Shadowsword
The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:06:00 -
[77] - Quote
David Xavier wrote:The Tornado is absolutely awe inspiring, I just hope that the Gallentean one will not be A BIG AMORPHOUS AMOEBA with engines strapped on it.
Imagine the Horror, if it's a giant navitas. The screams would reach the heavens. |

Arklan1
Dunedain Rangers WUT ALLIANCE
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:06:00 -
[78] - Quote
holy god, YES! exactly my play style, and sexy ship too. i can't wait to lose a billion of them as i try and make the kill before my tank shreds like that paper it will be. |

W1NGNU7
Star Mandate Property Management Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:07:00 -
[79] - Quote
looks like im going to be buying a small stock of large weapons cause this S  is about to get CRAZZY i can already see prices going thru the roof!!! but hey more bigger better pew pew with only a BC sig size this is gonna be PURE AWESOMENESS!! |

NeoShocker
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:09:00 -
[80] - Quote
Sweet. Then I already fully qualified to fly them gems for caldari and minmatar :-) Dont got tech two BS weaponry for amarr or gallente. I hate flying bs, but BC with BS weapons is going to encourage me to spec up BS sized skills! I love my cruiser sized ships.
I guess I can assume that best looking ships from the art winners is converted to BC size. But I heard that CCP did not pick the winner of EACH race? |
|

captain curry
Empyrean Warriors The Obsidian Front
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:10:00 -
[81] - Quote
Well, i was confused about what i was going to be training for in the near future, looks like i've found my answer. Tempest with smaller sig and faster? yes please DuckSex > my solution to solo pvp: create an alt account. hunt yourself. |

Zagam
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
187
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:12:00 -
[82] - Quote
I think I need to clean my pants now.
Honestly though, I look forward to this ship, which seems designed for PvP (lots of gank, little tank), as long as the slots aren't mind-boggling, and its not absurdly priced. |

gfldex
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:12:00 -
[83] - Quote
Could we try that on sisi first to see if it actually works? Wouldn't be your first mistake you know. |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
315
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:12:00 -
[84] - Quote
Kewl new toy for suicide gankers. I'm sure they celebrate now.
|

Vincent Gaines
Macabre Votum Morsus Mihi
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:13:00 -
[85] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please!
NO! |

Zuju
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
im in love.
WHEN DO I GET THIS MASTERPIECE OF MINMATAR TECHNOLOGY!!! |

Cade Windstalker
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:13:00 -
[87] - Quote
The Caldari state demands a better long range hybrids platform! >.>
(or just rework the Ferox, that's good too) |

Maul555
Nuts and Vindictive Remix Technologies
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:14:00 -
[88] - Quote
Woah! Holy bat turds mothman!
|

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
126
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:14:00 -
[89] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Kewl new toy for suicide gankers. I'm sure they celebrate now.
Oh god.
Cheap BC with 1400mms arties.
Thanks for reminding me.
MACKINAWS, HERE I COME :D |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
419

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:15:00 -
[90] - Quote
I added a tribute to the Tornado's original designer. Let's all give him a big toast tonight. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|
|

ovenproofjet
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:17:00 -
[91] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Grey Stormshadow wrote:Kewl new toy for suicide gankers. I'm sure they celebrate now. Oh god. Cheap BC with 1400mms arties. Thanks for reminding me. MACKINAWS, HERE I COME :D
Don't get too excited, my bet is they'll only be able to use the lowest tier of Battleship weapons (without ******** fits). Which is a smart move by CCP imo cos they are some of the least used guns atm. |

Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
200
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:17:00 -
[92] - Quote
if you group them (and combine it with the SC nerf) you have a supercapital annihilation fleet. You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
109
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:17:00 -
[93] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I added a tribute to the Tornado's original designer. Let's all give him a big toast tonight. /Lone Person who and starts a stands Slow Clap
If movies are an indication others will join. |

Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:18:00 -
[94] - Quote
Good idea!
These are going to be so different from normal BCs that I'm not sure it makes sense to keep the name. Why not put them under a new category (someone suggested the name "Monitor" for this kind of ship), while keeping the skill requirements? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
283
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:18:00 -
[95] - Quote
I really can't wait for the stats on these ships to be released (and for them to show up on the test server) |

Miraqu
Marquie-X Corp
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:21:00 -
[96] - Quote
I love it already! |

Thorexion Lynch
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:22:00 -
[97] - Quote
Don't mean to jump the gun here but I have to ask, in regards to "the right pilot will be able to manage speed and distance" to compensate for the lack of tanking ability.... Are you giving us the sorely missed and dearly beloved real nano back? Like proper back in the day nano? |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
133
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:23:00 -
[98] - Quote
Give us Tornado BPO price and amount of minerals. |

Georgiy Giggle
The Sith Syndicate
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:24:00 -
[99] - Quote
Bullshit.
WTH are you doing? Make it as battle ship or as bc with normal guns.
And i know why CCP do so... They have finished model of tornado. They wanted to make it as bs... but... they think next way - "****, we need to make another 3 bs models to another factions". After that they remember starship contest, with a winner. CCP have to add a ship of a winner (Mentor). But there is another problem - "damn, it's a battlecruiser, we need to make more 3 to each faction".
And so lame ccp decided to combine this ship into one bullshit. CCP think "why not, then we will need to make only 2 models, for caldari and gallente tier3 bc, and not 6."
-1 to that idea. Sorry for my rude langiage, but it's my mind, and i can't find any other word but BULLSHIT! Not mastering proprieties, won't become firmly established. - Confucius |

Night Epoch
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:25:00 -
[100] - Quote
O_O
love it.
+1 CCP. Oversized gun BC hull is the smartest thing you could've done, IMO. I can't wait.
Also, in b4 torp drakes. |
|

Xantor Bludberry
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:25:00 -
[101] - Quote
YOU MADE MY DAY!!! Or whatever..... I allways want to have mid size fast ship and huge boomsticks on it .  |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
315
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:26:00 -
[102] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I added a tribute to the Tornado's original designer. Let's all give him a big toast tonight.
My corpmate <3
(The designer is "Pattern Clarc", who is in AHARM) CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:26:00 -
[103] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please!
lol if the caldari one gets missiles it will be a dangerous ship..... like a heavy bomber if it has torp launchers fitted.... perfect for taking down supers if flown in large groups Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
203
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:26:00 -
[104] - Quote
So we are getting a ship with the firepower of a battleship and the mobility (and probably price tag) of a battlecruiser? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Dennie Fleetfoot
EVE University Ivy League
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:27:00 -
[105] - Quote
BC5 straight on the queue after AF5 finishes in a week. Happy. Happy. Happy. |

Ydnari
Estrale Frontiers
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:27:00 -
[106] - Quote
Nice, hope they work, will be interesting to see the other 3 as well. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:28:00 -
[107] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships.
well finally ye have learned your lesson and realized eve online is a serious internet spaceship game again..... humble pie taste good?
will we be getting t3 industrials soon? Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
|

CCP Masterplan
C C P C C P Alliance
114

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:29:00 -
[108] - Quote
To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical |
|

DJ Xaphod
Eve Radio Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:30:00 -
[109] - Quote
Impresive; I so wish I'd managed to participate in this  Can't wait to see the other new ships :) EVE Radio, bringing music to the masses
Purple Sabbath, with Xaphod; Sunday 12:00 game time. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:31:00 -
[110] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical
hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
|

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:32:00 -
[111] - Quote
Two step wrote:Heard on our skype channel: [10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face I guess mudflation is also a kind of balance.
I'm glad to see CCP is getting around to putting some more ships in. Gonna be interesting to see the stats. |

WisdomLikeSilence
The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League
61
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:32:00 -
[112] - Quote
See you later, drakes. And good riddance. 1600mm Alphastrike BCs are gonna be main fleet weapon for every alliance.
Also: Lemme see, large neutrons on a gallente BC hull = Myrmythron?
|

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
111
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:33:00 -
[113] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote: Something vertical
It's new nickname is the Verticane.
Make it happen.
|

Shang Fei
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:33:00 -
[114] - Quote
YES this is very much approved! Looking forward to the Gallentean equivalent as well! |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
185
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:34:00 -
[115] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
You are such a nasty, nasty tease!
|

M1AU
Rheintal Underground Rising
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:34:00 -
[116] - Quote
Winter is coming! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:35:00 -
[117] - Quote
So, in other words, they will be actual battlecruisers, unlike the old ones. Nice!
GÇŞon the other hand, this means I now have to train BS-sized weapons even though I'm a sub-BS pilot. Damn you!  GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
86
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:35:00 -
[118] - Quote
are any of these new ships on sisi yet? Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

DJ P0N-3
Table Flippendeavors
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:36:00 -
[119] - Quote
Is this the real life? |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:38:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So, in other words, they will be actual battlecruisers, unlike the old ones. Nice! GÇŞon the other hand, this means I now have to train BS-sized weapons even though I'm a sub-BS pilot. Damn you!  Alara IonStorm wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:Something vertical It's new nickname is the Verticane. Make it happen. Nah. It's still a minmatardon. Or myrmatar.
you could fit a 100nm ab II and just use 1 less large gun for an insanely fast bc?.... a tengu on steroids Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
|

Laechyd Eldgorn
draketrain
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:38:00 -
[121] - Quote
wait
TECH 1 BATTLECRUISER WITH BATTLESHIP SIZE GUNS????
SOUNDS LIKE MOST ******** IDEA EVER
so basicly unless i understood wrong you have hurricane with uber tank and tempest class dps
WTF
is this the new idea to make game interesting like lets make new ships which make old ones useless?
older characters are still missing any new ships to train for and you just decide to pop out new uber tech 1 ship out of nowhere, not lkie tech 3 wouldn't be easy enough to train already? can't we have ANYTHING for older characters anymore?
|

Nirnaeth Ornoediad
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:39:00 -
[122] - Quote
I was just thinking the other day about how a pocket battleship would fit nicely into EVEs lineup. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:40:00 -
[123] - Quote
Laechyd Eldgorn wrote:wait
TECH 1 BATTLECRUISER WITH BATTLESHIP SIZE GUNS????
SOUNDS LIKE MOST ******** IDEA EVER
so basicly unless i understood wrong you have hurricane with uber tank and tempest class dps
WTF
is this the new idea to make game interesting like lets make new ships which make old ones useless?
older characters are still missing any new ships to train for and you just decide to pop out new uber tech 1 ship out of nowhere, not lkie tech 3 wouldn't be easy enough to train already? can't we have ANYTHING for older characters anymore?
no it will be a glass cannon battlecruiser......... read the dev blog again only this time slowly Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:40:00 -
[124] - Quote
Today seems to be a particularly awesome day to have BC5 with perfect projectile gunnery.
GIEF NOW. |

Faith Sunstrider
Manufact Co.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:40:00 -
[125] - Quote
I can't wait to see the Amarrian one. :) |

Ardamalis
Vanguard Corp Bounty Hunters
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:40:00 -
[126] - Quote
More ships with different class sized guns--a nice refreshing concept that shakes up combat in eve . Hopefully more will come in the far future.
Winter expansion will not dissapoint. Keep up the good work CCP.
On a side note: Down the road, it would be nice to see some frigates with medium sized guns (gunships), anti-capital subcaps, bigger ships with smaller guns designed to kill smaller ships (heavy destroyers maybe?), etc. One can only dream. |

David Carel
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:41:00 -
[127] - Quote
All BC V/All Cruisers V crew checking in. Time to train Large Energy/Hybrid turrets. |

Ydnari
Estrale Frontiers
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:41:00 -
[128] - Quote
DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
87
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:42:00 -
[129] - Quote
lol NO miner or orca pilot will be safe now
this ship will be the ganker's choice Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:42:00 -
[130] - Quote
hmm, lets try my hand at prediction:
Lots of highslots. Not enough PG to fill them all with large guns.
Faster than a battleship, with battleship class weapons, just fewer of them. |
|

Jouron
Hadon Shipping
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:43:00 -
[131] - Quote
Fantastic new candy for new players.
How do you plan on fixing low sec.
Not that I think you wont, but thats a dev blog id like to see.
PS Will these things be able to pwn ships smaller then BC with BS weapons? That might be an issue. |

Thelron
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:43:00 -
[132] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:So we are getting a ship with the firepower of a battleship and the mobility (and probably price tag) of a battlecruiser?
Sounds like it, almost like it was supposed to be some kind of battlecruiser.
It'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. I've never liked the way the current BCs seem backwards (even if it's convenient to take them out for PvE since they're so safe), so having something come along that (hopefully) should be just a bit tougher than the big cruisers with comperable firepower to the smaller battleships is nice.
Oh the other hand, Jutland. |

DanMck
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:44:00 -
[133] - Quote
is it april fools day ? cause i feel like marty mcfly
these ships better have less hitpoints than a shuttle cause if not expect to see tier 3 battle crusiers in space
variety makes eve fun - people are sick of drakes so we just replace them with a new class of drakes.
you had better have another change that will balance this ? remember your nerfing super capitals because they are overpowered , don't make the same mistake
also bring back nano ! |

Hathrul
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Narwhals Ate My Duck
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:44:00 -
[134] - Quote
new ships!!!:D:D |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:45:00 -
[135] - Quote
That's a bullcrap to be honest.
To begin with, the very need in such a ship can only arise if the game is OVERTANKED. You were boosting HPs several times back in 2006 and later inroduced current fubar rig scheme which clearly promotes tank over anything else (50 calibration per EHP rig which aren't even stacking penalized; 200 calibration per damage rig which is stacking penalized and is a lot harder to crap due to increased PG usage - LOL?)
Quote:The concept is; violent, fast and fun. So now you ******* admit the game was spoilt back then. And instead of addressing the CORE ISSUE (overtank) you decide to 'mask' it with a new ship, which
Quote:[10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face
most likely will become a new FOTY and overpowered to the brim?
Instead of rebalancing existing stuff (like tier2 BCs; tech3; CS) you decide to widen the gap in popularity between proper ships and dirt-cheap OP crap even further? How cute. 2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is" 2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?" Nice progress, guys. |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
79
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:46:00 -
[136] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:Tippia wrote:So, in other words, they will be actual battlecruisers, unlike the old ones. Nice! GÇŞon the other hand, this means I now have to train BS-sized weapons even though I'm a sub-BS pilot. Damn you!  Alara IonStorm wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:Something vertical It's new nickname is the Verticane. Make it happen. Nah. It's still a minmatardon. Or myrmatar. you could fit a 100nm ab II and just use 1 less large gun for an insanely fast bc?.... a tengu on steroids remember how sleath bombers bonus works ? they got bonus to fit ONLY the good missile launcher type.
so tornado and his pairs will have bonus ONLY to fit large guns, not big powergrid. |

Vic Tenrach
Shooting Red Crosses
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:47:00 -
[137] - Quote
PLEASE EXCUSE ME WHILE I GO CHANGE MY SHORTS |

Harotak
Malicious Destruction War Against the Manifest
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:48:00 -
[138] - Quote
Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
189
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:49:00 -
[139] - Quote
I approve, although I fear for every other class of ships in the game. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:49:00 -
[140] - Quote
man good thing I just finished the t2 large arty grind on my battlecruiser V character and already have all the other large t2 guns
and this **** fits in an orca too |
|

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute Inver Brass
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:49:00 -
[141] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please! lol if the caldari one gets missiles it will be a dangerous ship..... like a heavy bomber if it has torp launchers fitted.... perfect for taking down supers if flown in large groups
It's Caldari, of course it will be flown in large groups of noobs very good players. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:50:00 -
[142] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:lol NO miner or orca pilot will be safe now
this ship will be the ganker's choice
:sun: |

Master Akira
Shiva Morsus Mihi
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:51:00 -
[143] - Quote
All Cruiser V, BC V, All T2 Large Specs trained crew checking in.
I'll just sit here sipping my mojito until winter  |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute Inver Brass
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:51:00 -
[144] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado also it keeps in tune with wind based storms for the minmatar battlecruisers cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale?
Whirlwind, twister, the list goes on. :) |

Alexander Yukari
TerraNovae Workers Trade Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:52:00 -
[145] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:
I have to say, that you say it will be easier for newer pilots to get into but then it requires battleship sized guns?
I'd say that's interesting because the major issue at the moment is that T2 Large Guns take WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY more training than training the Battleship skill.
But, hey - I'll take it - the Noobs can suffer at my awesomeness.
But now I have to train T2 Large Projectiles ;p
I see it as nice "bridge" between tier 2 BCs and getting into BSs (with decent skills).
|

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:54:00 -
[146] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:also wont the tier 1 bc now become obsolete? They kind of already are
Except the brutix maybe |

Szilardis
Cryogenic Creations
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:54:00 -
[147] - Quote
Personally I'd rather have either a BC with medium guns or a BS with large guns, and vary it up with some nifty bonuses, but oh well... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:55:00 -
[148] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:no it will be a glass cannon battlecruiser......... read the dev blog again only this time slowly Actually, that's the problem: they won't be glasss cannon battlecruisers based on that description. They will tank worse than battleships, but so what? Battlecruisers already do that, so that's not a drawback. Going by that, they will be normal battlecruisers (which can tank plenty) with large cannonsGÇŞ
GÇŞso more like iron cannons GÇö not as good as steel ones, but close enough. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

clideb50
Neotech Industrial
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:55:00 -
[149] - Quote
I don't think these new bc's were intended to replace current bc's but to work with them. instead of just fleets of hurricanes roaming around, it'll be a fleet of hurricanes with a wing of tornadoes to support them should they come across any thing big that might give the hurricanes trouble. I'm interested to see how this turns out. |

Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
1068
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:55:00 -
[150] - Quote
Ravcharas wrote:David Grogan wrote:also wont the tier 1 bc now become obsolete? They kind of already are brutix owns
but for its role of murdering miners yes gonna be obsolete |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
68
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:56:00 -
[151] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Kewl new toy for suicide gankers. I'm sure they celebrate now.
Ships don't suicide gank people, people do.  To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

kunniz
ISKRA-FU-0717 Paisti Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:56:00 -
[152] - Quote
So if it costs 40mil, does damage of battleship, why would anyone fly battleships anymore?
HACs/command ships will be even more useless now |

Mr LaForge
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:58:00 -
[153] - Quote
I'm sorry Drake, but I found something with larger knobs than your heavy missiles. I hope we can still be friends though. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
74
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 15:59:00 -
[154] - Quote
ChromeStriker wrote:My skill que just changed....
..mine too... need to get that cruise missile specialization up.
Chicken Pizza wrote:David Grogan wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please! lol if the caldari one gets missiles it will be a dangerous ship..... like a heavy bomber if it has torp launchers fitted.... perfect for taking down supers if flown in large groups It's Caldari, of course it will be flown in large groups of noobs very good players.
BTW... ain't nothin' wrong with being Caldari. The great thing about Caldari is the ability to tank large amounts of damage for a very short while. ...for low sec pirates that is ideal. And yes, the bar for entry is low, so it encourages a healthy pirate population. Just my 2 ISK... ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Kim Telkin
Love for You
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:00:00 -
[155] - Quote
Some assumptions: * Caldari BC will have the same PG as the drake * The bonus will be that it can fit BC sized launchers with a 90% reduction in fitting * No extra damage bonuses
Then I figure that you will just barely be able to squeeze 6 T2 Siege Launchers into the thing. With high damage T2 torps, maxed skills, and 3 BCS II's, pyfit tells me that you'll be doing just about 800 dps.
That doesn't seem like it would be entirely game breaking to me. Especially if you can only buffer 40K or less hitpoints onto the thing.
I'm looking forward to trying it out :) |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:00:00 -
[156] - Quote
kunniz wrote:So if it costs 40mil, does damage of battleship, why would anyone fly battleships anymore?
HACs/command ships will be even more useless now
Because Battleships will carry more guns? Probably. |

Klam
Church of Boom
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:01:00 -
[157] - Quote
A new ship to mix up the stagnating PvP strategies.
Awesome!
These are the types of disruptive changes the players can get behind! I really hope they do have paper thin tanks to help these fit into a rock, paper, scissors game of strategy in fleet composition.
Damage resistance penalty seems the best route to achieve paper-thin ships regardless of power grid.
- Hoping the Gallente one has enough drone bandwidth for a full flight of heavy/sentry. The don't need a super large drone bay (400m like the Dominix). But a Drone bay of 150 with a bandwidth of 125 would enable a single flight of large and light drones.
- Personally, I'm hoping the Caldari one is missile based. Long range Cruise missiles combined with a MWD on a BC sized hull to maintain range. With a paper thin tank.
- The possible capacitor issues on the Amarr ship will be interesting. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
88
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:01:00 -
[158] - Quote
EDIT: Forum fail double post Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
88
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:01:00 -
[159] - Quote
Chicken Pizza wrote:David Grogan wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado also it keeps in tune with wind based storms for the minmatar battlecruisers cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale? Whirlwind, twister, the list goes on. :)
aint a twister another name for a tornado? Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Yuko Ostus
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:02:00 -
[160] - Quote
I like new toys but wont this totally screw over the ganking game in the favor of the ganker? Massive dps and low cost, this wont go well with miners and haulers.... |
|

Bull Eramix
Mimidae Risk Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:03:00 -
[161] - Quote
Congrats to the ship designer. Can't wait to see the rest of them.
To all those panicking about these ships being terribly OP just keep in mind large guns = large tracking. So HACs and lighter ships might have a chance at getting underneath the guns. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:05:00 -
[162] - Quote
Yuko Ostus wrote:I like new toys but wont this totally screw over the ganking game in the favor of the ganker? Massive dps and low cost, this wont go well with miners and haulers.... Ganking needs to be improved anyway, so that's just two birds with one stone. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute Inver Brass
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:06:00 -
[163] - Quote
Gogela wrote:BTW... ain't nothin' wrong with being Caldari. The great thing about Caldari is the ability to tank large amounts of damage for a very short while. ...for low sec pirates that is ideal. And yes, the bar for entry is low, so it encourages a healthy pirate population. Just my 2 ISK...
For the pirates that I deal with daily, it's just another battlecruiser to fit a cyno on...
I will agree that there is nothing wrong with flying Caldari ships. I was just pointing out the likelihood of this new ship replacing drakes as the new derpfleet ship. |

Ravcharas
GREY COUNCIL Nulli Secunda
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:06:00 -
[164] - Quote
Quote:But when reviewing the armadas of existing ships we came to the conclusion that it would make much more sense to add another tier of battlecruisers instead of a fourth battleship tier, and that the accessibility of bc skills would mean more of these ships might be in the hands of younger, brasher pilots. The difference between BC and BS from a blank char is like four or five days. It's the large gun specializations that kills you. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:09:00 -
[165] - Quote
Tippia wrote:David Grogan wrote:no it will be a glass cannon battlecruiser......... read the dev blog again only this time slowly Actually, that's the problem: they won't be glasss cannon battlecruisers based on that description. They will tank worse than battleships, but so what? Battlecruisers already do that, so that's not a drawback. Going by that, they will be normal battlecruisers (which can tank plenty) with large cannonsGÇŞ GÇŞso more like iron cannons GÇö not as good as steel ones, but close enough.
CCP have said they will not tank like battleships. That does not mean they will tank like battlecruisers, the dev blog did not put a limit on how little they will tank, only on how much they can tank.
I imagine they will only be able to field the tank of a shield hurricane or brutix. Which will balance out their large dps and make them massive primary targets in fleet battles, diminishing their value.
Latest PVP Video: Laktos Intolerance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Sarmatiko
117
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:10:00 -
[166] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one  New gallente battlecruiser is like a fresh wind in the EVE universe. Brave and manly design inspired by classic Elite 
|

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
79
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:10:00 -
[167] - Quote
Ravcharas wrote: The difference between BC and BS from a blank char is like four or five days. It's the large gun specializations that kills you.
i think they consider new chars won't use tech2 guns |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute Inver Brass
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:12:00 -
[168] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:Chicken Pizza wrote:David Grogan wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado also it keeps in tune with wind based storms for the minmatar battlecruisers cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale? Whirlwind, twister, the list goes on. :) aint a twister another name for a tornado?
Main Entry: tornado GÇé[tawr-ney-doh] Part of Speech:noun Definition:weather event Synonyms: cyclone, funnel, storm, twister, typhoon, whirlwind, wind
I think we're beyond synonyms at this point. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
89
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:13:00 -
[169] - Quote
Sarmatiko wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one  New gallente battlecruiser is like a fresh wind in the EVE universe. Brave and manly design inspired by classic Elite 
man they can't use that model........... starwars would be all over them like a rash on hooker's crotch Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

BeanBagKing
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:13:00 -
[170] - Quote
I can't wait to get the gallente one so I can fit a caldari shield tank on it and some large minmatar guns =D |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:14:00 -
[171] - Quote
Laktos wrote:CCP have said they will not tank like battleships. That does not mean they will tank like battlecruisers, the dev blog did not put a limit on how little they will tank, only on how much they can tank. Yes, but the wording is indicative of a rather flawed thinking: they get the benefit of BS guns, and the supposed price for this is GÇŁnot a BS tankGÇĄ which is not a price at all.
Quote:I imagine they will only be able to field the tank of a shield hurricane or brutix. Which will balance out their large dps and make them massive primary targets in fleet battles, diminishing their value. No, it does not balance it out. It means they don't lose any tanking ability compared to the other BCs, and get extra damage output out of nowhere, with no drawbacks.
If they were given the tanks of a shield-tanked thorax or rupture, then we'd be talking balance: weapons one size higher GÇö tank one size lower. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
89
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
lol must war dec high sec pos owners when the new bpos come out.... get the edge on building them while they cant stick them in their pos labs for fear of losing them Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Digital Gaidin
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:15:00 -
[173] - Quote
So basically CCP is introducing Pocket Battleships into EVE?
Cool....  |

Cade Windstalker
EVE University Ivy League
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:15:00 -
[174] - Quote
Just a note, not all BC can fit a nutty tank. They may reduce the Powergrid and CPU in exchange for a bonus to fitting large guns. |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:18:00 -
[175] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:I imagine they will only be able to field the tank of a shield hurricane or brutix. Which will balance out their large dps and make them massive primary targets in fleet battles, diminishing their value. No, it does not balance it out. It means they don't lose any tanking ability compared to the other BCs
What on earth are you on about? A standard tanked bc has 70-80k ehp. 40k is half that. If they can reach 40k at max, then that is a reduced tanking ability compared to a standard battlecruiser.
And btw, t1 cruisers can tank 40k ehp. Shield hurricanes and brutixes tank 40k ehp.
Latest PVP Video: Laktos Intolerance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:23:00 -
[176] - Quote
Laktos wrote:What on earth are you on about? A standard tanked bc has 70-80k ehp. 40k is half that. If they can reach 40k at max, then that is a reduced tanking ability compared to a standard battlecruiser. I'm on about how you put up normally fitted BCs as an example of how they will be somehow at a disadvantage. There is a reason why people shield-tank their Hurricanes and Brutixes, and that reason remains even with these new ships. So, if these ships achieve the same tank with the same fits, then they are not paying for their additional firepower.
But sure, if you insist: I retract my previous retraction: they should tank like shield-tanked thoraxes and ruptures GÇö gunsize+1 GĺĆ tanksize-1. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Marie Celeste Engelenhart
Amarr War Industries Empire Industry
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:25:00 -
[177] - Quote
Will it be cov ops, like a stealthbomber on steroids? |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
74
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:25:00 -
[178] - Quote
Chicken Pizza wrote:Gogela wrote:BTW... ain't nothin' wrong with being Caldari. The great thing about Caldari is the ability to tank large amounts of damage for a very short while. ...for low sec pirates that is ideal. And yes, the bar for entry is low, so it encourages a healthy pirate population. Just my 2 ISK... For the pirates that I deal with daily, it's just another battlecruiser to fit a cyno on... I will agree that there is nothing wrong with flying Caldari ships. I was just pointing out the likelihood of this new ship replacing drakes as the new derpfleet ship.
I'll sure grant your that... In fact I'll wager this will usher in a whole new era of "derp" the like of which we've never seen. Should = a lot more explosions though.... good for industry, good for fun factor imho...
ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

DeadDuck
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:25:00 -
[179] - Quote
OUCH. BC's with BS guns. And FYI that was the original concept when they were created in the beggining of the 20th Century. Lighter ships then BS's but with BS fire power.
Scrap all existing fleet battle's tactics. These baby's are going to reinvente fleet warfare 
|

Burseg Sardaukar
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
44
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:26:00 -
[180] - Quote
Hmm... guess my Hulkageddon fleet will be using the Gallente version of these instead of a Brutix. We have a blog, it is terrible. How to fix Bounty Hunting |
|

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
393
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:29:00 -
[181] - Quote
Does anyone else see these new BCs getting eaten up by swarms of smaller ships?
"Captain! Tordado sighted dead ahead!"
"Send in the assault frigates!" Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Nopsa
Lithium Flower.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:29:00 -
[182] - Quote
I hail the torp drake! Your day shall be soon. |

Ugleb
Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:30:00 -
[183] - Quote
While cool, doesn't a BC dealing BS-level damage kind of make BS more irrelevant? You get the damage output without the price tag on a faster more manoeuvrable ship. Ok its not as tough, there is going to be more of these on the field to do the melting, right?
Conceptually it seems to be a step towards further cementing BC dominance on the field. Bit bothered by that.
Please do not give these large weapon BC's any sort of tracking bonus. 'Glass cannons' might be a good design principle here. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ |

Toshiko Kin
Material Reclamation Services
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:30:00 -
[184] - Quote
Sa-weet! |

Digital Gaidin
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:30:00 -
[185] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Laktos wrote:What on earth are you on about? A standard tanked bc has 70-80k ehp. 40k is half that. If they can reach 40k at max, then that is a reduced tanking ability compared to a standard battlecruiser. I'm on about how you put up normally fitted BCs as an example of how they will be somehow at a disadvantage. There is a reason why people shield-tank their Hurricanes and Brutixes, and that reason remains even with these new ships. So, if these ships achieve the same tank with the same fits, then they are not paying for their additional firepower. But sure, if you insist: I retract my previous retraction: they should tank like shield-tanked thoraxes and ruptures GÇö gunsize+1 GĺĆ tanksize-1. I disagree... there is an interesting historical precedent for this type of ship dating back to WW2 (google Pocket Battleships if you want to learn more). If anything, they should tank along the lines of a Cruiser/Battlecruiser class but carry a Battleships armament. Their advantages include near Battleship firepower (we don't know how many turrets/launchers though - maybe 6?), and the speed and agility of a Cruiser. Their disadvantage is that they cannot take the hits like a Battleship, meaning they effectively have a nasty glass jaw that'll be their achilles heal.
I'd like to see these ships land in the 35-40mil price range on the market, have probably 6 launchers/turrets, and a tank just slightly higher than a T2 Battlecruiser (think Harbinger/Hurricane, not Drake/Myrmidon). If possible, avoiding an uber-tanking option like the Drake would be preferred else a new "one size fits all" fleet doctrine will be shoehorned into EVE. |

Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:31:00 -
[186] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Laktos wrote:CCP have said they will not tank like battleships. That does not mean they will tank like battlecruisers, the dev blog did not put a limit on how little they will tank, only on how much they can tank. Yes, but the wording is indicative of a rather flawed thinking: they get the benefit of BS guns, and the supposed price for this is GÇŁnot a BS tankGÇĄ which is not a price at all. The price would be the reduced tracking compared to tank. These tier 3 BCs should be easy prey for HACs and recons. |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
393
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:33:00 -
[187] - Quote
Ugleb wrote:While cool, doesn't a BC dealing BS-level damage kind of make BS more irrelevant? You get the damage output without the price tag on a faster more manoeuvrable ship. Ok its not as tough, there is going to be more of these on the field to do the melting, right?
Conceptually it seems to be a step towards further cementing BC dominance on the field. Bit bothered by that.
Hard to say... I imagine the sig radius will be large enough that a BS can severely threaten them while tanking what they dish out, more likely a ship best suited to choice targets. Also, it'll promote fleets bringing smaller ships that the BS sized weapons can't hit effectively to eat them up. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:33:00 -
[188] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:Told you winter is going to own if you like spaceships.
/Me tips hat.
But, yes, the Caldari one must be a missile boat. |

XXSketchxx
Remote Soviet Industries
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:34:00 -
[189] - Quote
Georgiy Giggle wrote:Bullshit. WTH are you doing? Make it as battle ship or as bc with normal guns. And i know why CCP do so... They have finished model of tornado. They wanted to make it as bs... but... they think next way - "****, we need to make another 3 bs models to another factions". After that they remember starship contest, with a winner. CCP have to add a ship of a winner ( Mentor). But there is another problem - "damn, it's a battlecruiser, we need to make more 3 to each faction". And so lame ccp decided to combine this ship into one bullshit. CCP think "why not, then we will need to make only 2 models, for caldari and gallente tier3 bc, and not 6." -1 to that idea. Sorry for my rude langiage, but it's my mind, and i can't find any other word but BULLSHIT! And what will be next? Cruisers with large smartbombs? Frigates with capital turrets? Shuttle with doomsdays? LAME!
get fuc*ked pubbie |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:34:00 -
[190] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Laktos wrote:What on earth are you on about? A standard tanked bc has 70-80k ehp. 40k is half that. If they can reach 40k at max, then that is a reduced tanking ability compared to a standard battlecruiser. I'm on about how you put up normally fitted BCs as an example of how they will be somehow at a disadvantage. There is a reason why people shield-tank their Hurricanes and Brutixes, and that reason remains even with these new ships. So, if these ships achieve the same tank with the same fits, then they are not paying for their additional firepower. But sure, if you insist: I retract my previous retraction: they should tank like shield-tanked thoraxes and ruptures GÇö gunsize+1 GĺĆ tanksize-1.
A shield tanked brutix/hurricane is not a normal battlecruiser. For the brutix perhaps its more normal, but a cane especially is a natural armor tanker. It gets twice the ehp armor tanked, nearly as much damage (more if you consider it fights up close more than a shield cane which is likely to be at range), and proper tackle in its midslots. And it still gets dual med neuts.
These ships are natural armor tankers that have had shield tanks forced onto them for a particular purpose. I am saying that a shield tanked hurricane has a sub-standard tank, which it makes up for in range control.
The tornado will almost certainly have a sub-standard tank from the get-go. It'll be powerful sure, it should be, it is after all a tier 3 ship. But I highly doubt it will have the tank of a standard battlecruiser. Shield tanked hurricanes might seem standard because of their popularity, but I do not believe they are. The hurricane was meant to be armor tanked and properly tanked battlecruisers have 70k+ehp. Not 40k.
In essence we are in agreement, we only differ in the details of how low the tornado's tank should be.
Latest PVP Video: Laktos Intolerance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |
|

Katabrok First
Apukaray Security
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:34:00 -
[191] - Quote
Great!
I would like to be remembered as one of the guys who had this idea about putting big guns on a battlecruiser. CCP liked my idea? That's wonderful. Now give credit where credit is due :
[url]http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1065355-0/page/1[/url]
Kata
PS.: How much time until the winter expansion? |

Maul555
Nuts and Vindictive Remix Technologies
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:35:00 -
[192] - Quote
Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide.
No escape from reality |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
794
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:36:00 -
[193] - Quote
Digital Gaidin wrote:I disagree... there is an interesting historical precedent for this type of ship dating back to WW2 I know, but real world is not a suitable argument for making older ships obsolete GÇö hell, it's hardly even relevant to begin with.
The problem I'm seeing here is that there doesn't seem to be any disadvantage to having those big guns that provides any real decision between the tier-3 and tier-2 BCs. If the former tank as well as the latter and do more damage, then they've just repeated the mistake they made with the tier-2 BCs (which, as you might have noticed, made the tier-1 BCs relatively pointless).
Jack Dant wrote:The price would be the reduced tracking compared to tank. Fair enough, but I'm not sure that's sufficient to make them a not-obvious choice over tier-2s. In fact I'm pretty darn certain that it's not sufficient.
Laktos wrote:A shield tanked brutix/hurricane is not a normal battlecruiser. It is, because that's how they end up being fitted. Yes, both of them can get a better tank if you slap armour plates onto them, but if you do that, they become horrid and lose their main advantages: speed and/or massive DPS. So I consider shield tank to be the natural state for a 'Cane, just like I predict shields will be the natural state for the Myrmatar.
Quote:The tornado will almost certainly have a sub-standard tank from the get-go. GÇŞand that's what I fear we won't see, because of the wording of that statement: they are paying the price for BS guns by having not-BS tanks, which they will have even with standard BC tanks.
Unless the shield-Myrmatar ends up having 25-30k EHP compared to the shield-cane's 40k, it will have far too much tank, and I'm afraid that it will have those 40kGÇŞ which would be bad. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
188
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:36:00 -
[194] - Quote
Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love.
Not emptyquoting, just bringing this back up. Please, for the love of pete, make the Gallente one not suck. Our standard BC is worse in literally every way to the Minmatar BC. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration
75
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:36:00 -
[195] - Quote
Ugleb wrote:While cool, doesn't a BC dealing BS-level damage kind of make BS more irrelevant? You get the damage output without the price tag on a faster more manoeuvrable ship. Ok its not as tough, there is going to be more of these on the field to do the melting, right?
Conceptually it seems to be a step towards further cementing BC dominance on the field. Bit bothered by that.
I was actually just thinking the opposite. If anything, I think it will fast-track people to BS. Here's why: Tier 3 BC = BS damage, BC speed, BC tank, Almost BS fit cost. Difference between the new BC and a BS (I'm of course guessing here) is only the exchange of tank for speed and maybe 30-40 mil for T2 fit + hull, tops. It narrows the difference between the two... in fact it looks like a really well balanced split between say a drake and a raven for caldari. I think when the newer pilots start loosing enough of these things they will start taking a harder look at BS.
ALL GëívGëí Ships | Odd-áGëívGëí Items | <-- Links to showInfo in-game |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Important Internet Spaceship League
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:37:00 -
[196] - Quote
My. God. CCP. Everything we've ever hoped for or wished. Coming soon. How are you guys accomplishing all of this? We've been hearing "no time" "too much work for one release" for so long... now everything is being released at once. I feel overwhelmed. |

Schnoo
EC Riders Mech Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:37:00 -
[197] - Quote
well, what most people have failed to bring up in this thread is, these ships will also have the "penalties" of large guns, i.e their tracking or missile signature will make them have a hard time hitting small ships.
in fact, this whole thing, along with the AF buff (it is going to be a buff, right?) might revitalize frigates in fleets, and the new tier 3 battlecruisers really feel like the "heavy bombers" many have proposed - smaller ships able to destroy caps, but weak in subcap engagements
while having a rock, paper, scissor kind of balance isn't the best of the world, this may bring up the following: supercaps > caps caps > BS tier 3 BC > BC, caps, supercaps hac/cruiser > tier 3 BC, BS BS > BC, tier 3 included normal BC > hac/cruiser AF > hac, BC (tier 3 especially) (this the hac part isn't true yet)
hmm, maybe we need to make AFs able to kill HACs, and add destroyers (real t2 ones) there to kill frigates, and the destroyers themselves killable by hacs
|

Mors Magne
Astral Adventure
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:38:00 -
[198] - Quote
I'm really looking forward to this!  |

Rong Targets
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:38:00 -
[199] - Quote
Thank you ccp, it is about time |

Johan Krieger
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:39:00 -
[200] - Quote
Laechyd Eldgorn wrote:wait
TECH 1 BATTLECRUISER WITH BATTLESHIP SIZE GUNS????
SOUNDS LIKE MOST ******** IDEA EVER
so basicly unless i understood wrong you have hurricane with uber tank and tempest class dps
WTF
is this the new idea to make game interesting like lets make new ships which make old ones useless?
older characters are still missing any new ships to train for and you just decide to pop out new uber tech 1 ship out of nowhere, not lkie tech 3 wouldn't be easy enough to train already? can't we have ANYTHING for older characters anymore?
Get out. |
|

Draca Maru
The Dark Space Initiative Revival Of The Talocan Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:46:00 -
[201] - Quote
Sounds nice. Keep the good news rolling in! |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:47:00 -
[202] - Quote
deleted Too late for reality |

Tsubutai
The Tuskers
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:49:00 -
[203] - Quote
Interesting idea, but I think they have the potential to be a balancing nightmare if badly handled. Agree with those who say they should be significantly undertanked relative to current BCs; not much more than 30k EHP or so. |

MIkhail Illiad
Fevered Imaginings
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:50:00 -
[204] - Quote
WIN!  |

Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
74
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:50:00 -
[205] - Quote
Confirming I want one.
Nao.
C. |

Dennie Fleetfoot
EVE University Ivy League
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:52:00 -
[206] - Quote
Raid'En wrote:David Grogan wrote:Tippia wrote:So, in other words, they will be actual battlecruisers, unlike the old ones. Nice! GÇŞon the other hand, this means I now have to train BS-sized weapons even though I'm a sub-BS pilot. Damn you!  Alara IonStorm wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:Something vertical It's new nickname is the Verticane. Make it happen. Nah. It's still a minmatardon. Or myrmatar. you could fit a 100nm ab II and just use 1 less large gun for an insanely fast bc?.... a tengu on steroids remember how sleath bombers bonus works ? they got bonus to fit ONLY the good missile launcher type. so tornado and his pairs will have bonus ONLY to fit large guns, not big powergrid.
My thinking too. The only way this will work is if the new BC's have a fitting bonus for BS's weapons. Increasing the cap and CPU abilities of them is just asking for trouble. |

Cunane Jeran
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:53:00 -
[207] - Quote
Oh please let the Gallente one be a Blaster BEAST. I will give you an organ OF CHOICE if it helps. |

Thaif
Syndikos Consortium
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:55:00 -
[208] - Quote
Alright.
Now to see what kind of an asymmetric monster the Caldari BC is.
If it's another missile spammer then...sigh.
If it's a mixed platform like the Merlin then *yay*.
More ships, more fun.
Still waiting for that Hybrid Weapons Balancing blog post. I suppose it's worth it to wait for good things. It requires more than a day's devotion to know and to possess the wealth of a day. |

Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 16:59:00 -
[209] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado also it keeps in tune with wind based storms for the minmatar battlecruisers cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale? Taifun 
|

Danny Centauri
Baltic Eagle
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:00:00 -
[210] - Quote
Would be nice to see these ships being super agile too, so really low tank big guns and able to get the hell out of there if needs be. This way the ship can have 2 roles: 1) Glass Cannon - Epic gank ship with preferably 30k EHP tank max, also the pirates ship of choice and supercap blobbers ship of choice. It goes nicely with the capital changes this way too. 2) Sniper BC - Nice long range sniper ship that is able to get off grid easier than the sniper BS of old.
This would make for a nice niche ship I look forward to seeing the stats. The only one that will dissapoint me is the Gallente one as I prefer drones 100 times over turrets.... high slots are for remote reps ;). |
|

Yazzinra
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:00:00 -
[211] - Quote
im assuming theyll still be able to fit ganglinks?
you've said the gallente boat is beautiful, but is it functional?
i loves my myrmidon. Any clue if this will be an upgrade, or a sidegrade?
i can haz pictur plz? |

DJ Xaphod
Eve Radio Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:03:00 -
[212] - Quote
I want more EVE physical models. Possibly as airfix style glue together yourself kind of things.
am I the only one?
EVE Radio, bringing music to the masses; http://eve-radio.com
Purple Sabbath, with Xaphod; Sunday 12:00 game time.-á Now including the Lemmings Leap |

GRIEV3R
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:05:00 -
[213] - Quote
this is awesome!
can't wait to see the gallente one! |

Rei Nakasone
Enders Of All Things
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:05:00 -
[214] - Quote
Come on guys, show the new Caldari BC some love :D Hoping for a fast mid range torp boat that is capable of taking on a BS in small gangs and capable of some loooong rage cruise bombardment. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
34
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:05:00 -
[215] - Quote
ovenproofjet wrote: Don't get too excited, my bet is they'll only be able to use the lowest tier of Battleship weapons (without ******** fits). Which is a smart move by CCP imo cos they are some of the least used guns atm.
And we have no idea how many weapon slots there will be either. Even with 8 highs, it could be such that only four L weapons will fit. |

Spyker Slater
LASER TECH For Medicinal Use Only
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:06:00 -
[216] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality
Open your eyes |

DJ Xaphod
Eve Radio Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:09:00 -
[217] - Quote
Spyker Slater wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality Open your eyes
Look up to the sky? EVE Radio, bringing music to the masses; http://eve-radio.com
Purple Sabbath, with Xaphod; Sunday 12:00 game time.-á Now including the Lemmings Leap |

Laktos
Gunpoint Diplomacy
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:09:00 -
[218] - Quote
DJ Xaphod wrote:Spyker Slater wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote: Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality Open your eyes Look up to the sky?
and see Latest PVP Video: Laktos Intolerance
Sard Caid does not endorse this message. |

Spyker Slater
LASER TECH For Medicinal Use Only
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:10:00 -
[219] - Quote
Just imagine how nice it would look with some new stars in the background .... |

David Xavier
The Scope Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:12:00 -
[220] - Quote
BeanBagKing wrote:I can't wait to get the gallente one so I can fit a caldari shield tank on it and some large minmatar guns =D
I fear this will be the case... but hey let's be optimistic, I am sure it will be a killer with ACs. :) |
|

Rei Nakasone
Enders Of All Things
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:14:00 -
[221] - Quote
David Xavier wrote:BeanBagKing wrote:I can't wait to get the gallente one so I can fit a caldari shield tank on it and some large minmatar guns =D I fear this will be the case... but hey let's be optimistic, I am sure it will be a killer with ACs. :)
I hope they give it bonuses to hybrids, new uber brutix anyone? |

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
104
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:15:00 -
[222] - Quote
Dang...just realized the ships are going to be "TIER" 3 not "TECH" 3...oh well...I guess it makes sense to do Tier 3 before going Tech 3.
Technically Tier's are a made up naming convention by the players. I don't think I have seen anywhere on a ship that states what tier it is. We just put the ship into a tier category based on it's states compared to other ships of its class.
Still...I see a new favored ship to my Drake in the future...so glad I have BC5...oooh...I can do Amarr as well...maybe I will train up for that Tornado after all... Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |

Bratwurst0r
Austrian Industrial Corporation Universal Constant Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:15:00 -
[223] - Quote
This will be interesting, potentially nerf every other ship into the ground. Let the games begin (till summer emergency-nerf). |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:16:00 -
[224] - Quote
I support this product and/or service.
Good job, CCP. |

Jaenen
Recettear Acquisitions LTD
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:18:00 -
[225] - Quote
Oooh, this looks awesome. Pocket battleship designed to speedtank? Be interesting to see how you pull it off, CCP. As for getting one for each race... I don't know about the rest of you, but I really hope the Amarr one is a Khanid design, spamming out torps and/or cruises. That would neatly get around the cap issue of Tachyons/Megabeams/Megapulse, and leave them open to make the Caldari one a railboat.
Can't wait to see the other three, and the hybrid rebalance. |

GRIEV3R
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:19:00 -
[226] - Quote
My $0.02 predictions:
(assuming equal numbers and no logi)
New BCs vs Battleships: Battleships win because they have the tank. The new BCs will get shredded by BS guns just like regular BCs because of their sig radius.
New BCs vs HACs HACs win based on speed.
New BCs vs Tech 3's Tech 3's **** face, no contest at all.
New BCs vs AF's AFs win like a pack of piranhas
(not assuming equal numbers) New BCs vs Supercarriers: New BCs win easily.
New BCs vs regular carriers: Fighters will rip New BCs to shreds, but New BCs will do huge damage to carriers. If spider tank, carriers win. If no spider tank, New BCs win (barely).
New BCs vs titans: With sufficient numbers, new BCs win. Otherwise, the fight takes to long and reinforcements show up.
tl;dr i think the New BCs will work best against supercarriers. Mixed in with other subcaps, idk. It's complicated. |

Dennie Fleetfoot
EVE University Ivy League
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:21:00 -
[227] - Quote
DJ Xaphod wrote:I want more EVE physical models. Possibly as airfix style glue together yourself kind of things.
am I the only one?
No, your not the only one. |

V'oba
Cosmodynamics
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:34:00 -
[228] - Quote
I suspect these new ships will become the new cheap(ish) weapon of choice for hit and runs against BS gangs. They'll probably also be quite good against cruisers/ other BCs if they can keep range.
And if they get tackled they're ******, which i think is a fairly even trade off. One interceptor or AF would ruin these thing's day. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:35:00 -
[229] - Quote
hey CCP will we also get tech II tier 3 bc anytime soon?
Also what about npc pirate faction bc? Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:38:00 -
[230] - Quote
V'oba wrote:I suspect these new ships will become the new cheap(ish) weapon of choice for hit and runs against BS gangs. They'll probably also be quite good against cruisers/ other BCs if they can keep range.
And if they get tackled they're ******, which i think is a fairly even trade off. One interceptor or AF would ruin these thing's day.
to be honest a good logi fleet should be able to keep them alive..... we already see the effectiveness of welpcanes vs supers. Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
|

Mioelnir
Cataclysm Enterprises Ev0ke
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:48:00 -
[231] - Quote
GRIEV3R wrote:It's complicated.
Highlighting the most important part. This just in, eve pvp a bit more complicated again.
|

GRIEV3R
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:50:00 -
[232] - Quote
Mioelnir wrote:GRIEV3R wrote:It's complicated. Highlighting the most important part. This just in, eve pvp a bit more complicated again.
Yep. And that's definitely a good thing.
I for one can't wait! |

wicked cheese
Imperial Research Inovations
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:50:00 -
[233] - Quote
even though the blog says its going to be the tier 3 battlecruiser i still wonder. the concept of these ships using oversized guns will be new to eve, which i one reason i doubt they will be T1. when bc's first came out they did not have fleet bonus's, most T1 ships didnt have unique bonus's when they came out. (by unique i mean new concepts brought with them(caps barges and freighters being the exceptions; but they also recieved their own catagory)). ship cost and advantages/disadvantages aside; its just out of ccps structure to do that.
chances are it wont be T2 as they would either have to reskin the tier 2's or introduce a T1 regular varient. although this is what i believe they should fall under with an appropriate tank to justify the cost.
i kinda lean towards the thought of it being T3. it would seem to fall under advanced technology category, along with the fact that theres only 4 T3 ships and a shitton of T1. but i would have figured a T3 frig would have surfaced long before a T3 bc would, unless they couldnt find a good role for them.
this release may lead to frigs with med guns and battleships with cap guns. much like covop dictors and the AF/HAC/CS that are set up similar did. which is why i dont see it just being added to the T1 list.
but they still did present it as the tier 3 bc (could the T3 cruisers be considered Tier5?). theirs only 1 of each T1 destroyer and 2 of each T1 amarr/caldari industrials so saying the field was less than the other T1 sub caps wouldnt be a good argument. the only reason i could figure for intentionally misguiding people is so that everyone and their mother didnt go crazy on the T3 market (see: PI update). only time will tell but i honestly dont see this being T1 unless its got a cruiser sized tank |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
79
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:53:00 -
[234] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Does anyone else see these new BCs getting eaten up by swarms of smaller ships?
"Captain! Tordado sighted dead ahead!"
"Send in the assault frigates!" i would like if they design them that way.
able to kill their sized companions, but very vulnerable to ants. seems close to what they want to change supers to btw |

Ad'Hakim Tahous
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:54:00 -
[235] - Quote
I endorse this product..... Pocket Battleships FTW |

Garbad theWeak
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 17:55:00 -
[236] - Quote
Will we need to train a new skill to use these ships (ala command ships)?
Also, changing skill plan to perfect large projectiles and hybrids! |

Arethanerielle Xhiril
Black Plasma Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:01:00 -
[237] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality
Look at me, and tell me if you've known me before. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:02:00 -
[238] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Laktos wrote:CCP have said they will not tank like battleships. That does not mean they will tank like battlecruisers, the dev blog did not put a limit on how little they will tank, only on how much they can tank. Yes, but the wording is indicative of a rather flawed thinking: they get the benefit of BS guns, and the supposed price for this is GÇŁnot a BS tankGÇĄ which is not a price at all. Quote:I imagine they will only be able to field the tank of a shield hurricane or brutix. Which will balance out their large dps and make them massive primary targets in fleet battles, diminishing their value. No, it does not balance it out. It means they don't lose any tanking ability compared to the other BCs, and get extra damage output out of nowhere, with no drawbacks. If they were given the tanks of a shield-tanked thorax or rupture, then we'd be talking balance: weapons one size higher GÇö tank one size lower (edit: ok, not necessarily shield tanked at that pointGÇŞ but still, no longer a BC-level tank).
My bet would be that they have none of the traditional BC tanking special abilities (which is what makes current BC exceptional in this regard). Typical BC stats with no tank bonus makes for a "relatively" easy kill.
Hopefully I'm right and you are wrong on this one. 
Otherwise I'll stand beside you singing the songs of protest, and make another entry into my "Book of Grudges". To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Grytok
KL0NKRIEGER
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:07:00 -
[239] - Quote
We definately need more stuff like that, as if blobs of Hurricanes and Drakes aren't annoying enough allready :facepalm:
CCP continues to miss the things that really need fixing, like sov-mechanics, true-sec and moon-minerals. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:08:00 -
[240] - Quote
Quote:even though the blog says its going to be the tier 3 battlecruiser i still wonder. the concept of these ships using oversized guns will be new to eve, which i one reason i doubt they will be T1.
Stealth Bombers proved the concept had merit (granted, they are a T2 ship).
If the concept works, and it does work well, why not introduce it to a standard Tier 3 ship as well... To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
|

Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:17:00 -
[241] - Quote
I'm kind of sad that it wasn't a cycle of tier-1 EW BSes, with the web bonus Pattern outlined, to line up with the Scorpion(and give the Caldari a third combat battleship, to fill out that cycle), because I do love me some EW/DPS fits. But this could be cool too - I'm looking forward to the stats. |

Mashie Saldana
Veto. Veto Corp
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:22:00 -
[242] - Quote
Sweet, can't wait for the new Drakes fitted with torps/cruise missiles. Anastasia -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á Dominique-á-á Mashie -á-á Monica |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:25:00 -
[243] - Quote
Mashie Saldana wrote:Sweet, can't wait for the new Drakes fitted with torps/cruise missiles. Here that. Listen very carefully it is quite.
/whimper
That is the sound of the Raven realizing it will never be flown again.
|

Max Von Sydow
Droneboat Diplomacy
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:25:00 -
[244] - Quote
I wonder if they're gonna give us new destroyers next expansion? With medium guns perhaps? |

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:29:00 -
[245] - Quote
Tres Farmer wrote:David Grogan wrote:cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale? Taifun 
Taifun = typhoon.
Original Japanese: sŦTóż
English transliteration: sŦ = ty Tóż = phoo(n)
Finnish transliteration: sŦ = tai Tóż = fuu(ni)
Transliteration is different but the pronunciation is exactly the same.
Although the smiley there makes me suspect that you possibly are aware of this.
Interesting side note: No f as such in Japanese it's more like a mix of 60% h and 40% f.
Oh yea, almost forgot; I welcome our new tier 3 BC overlords. What next? Battleships with oversized turrets? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=131968#post131968 Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:31:00 -
[246] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Mashie Saldana wrote:Sweet, can't wait for the new Drakes fitted with torps/cruise missiles. Hear that. Listen very carefully it is quite. /whimper That is the sound of the Raven realizing it will never be flown again.
Unless, of course, they don't give the Tier 3 BC's drones.
--Weak but Speedy Tank
--Large Guns
--No Drones
Insta-elimination as far as Raven-Replacing PvE-utillity. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:33:00 -
[247] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Mashie Saldana wrote:Sweet, can't wait for the new Drakes fitted with torps/cruise missiles. Hear that. Listen very carefully it is quite. /whimper That is the sound of the Raven realizing it will never be flown again.
If these ships don't have any tank to speak of I don't think the Raven has much to worry about.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:34:00 -
[248] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: If these ships don't have any tank to speak of I don't think the Raven has much to worry about.
So it isn't a Drake with Large Missiles. Then the Drake has very little to worry about.
Long Live the Drake Blob and there 90k EHP. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:41:00 -
[249] - Quote
Actually, I could see this be the start of a whole new generation of ship design.
High tier tech 1 ships designed to use weapon system of the next higher class ship. Powerful, but very vulnerable.
High tier tech 2 ships designed to use weapon systems of ships 2 classes higher. (LIke the stealth bomber, highly specialized but extremely vulnerable.)
It wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility to design high tier Tech 1 ships (or redesign existing lower tier Tech 1 ships) around weapons systems that normally fit on 1 ship class LOWER than themselves, with bonuses to make the weapons extremely effective vs. smaller targets.... but rather ineffective against their own class or higher.
With that last bit, I'm talking specialized bonus/abillities to maximize combat performance, not just slapping small guns on a cruiser or BC.
Hmmmm, this might warrant some serious thought... To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
114
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:44:00 -
[250] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: It wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility to design high tier Tech 1 ships (or redesign existing lower tier Tech 1 ships) around weapons systems that normally fit on 1 ship class LOWER than themselves, with bonuses to make the weapons extremely effective vs. smaller targets.... but rather ineffective against their own class or higher.
With that last bit, I'm talking specialized bonus/abillities to maximize combat performance, not just slapping small guns on a cruiser or BC.
Hmmmm, this might warrant some serious thought...
Actually I am hoping the bump up the Tank on Destroyers and make them just that.
|
|

Sinooko
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:45:00 -
[251] - Quote
Why is it so hard to achieve symmetry!? |

Nonnori Ikkala
Love for You
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:49:00 -
[252] - Quote
Let me be the 17,000th person to say hell yes! And, agree that the tank should be noticeably below the tier 1 and 2 BCs to balance the additional damage output.
Ha, I hope all the drake pilots add torpedo specialization to their skill plans and then the Caldari boat get bonuses to large hybrid guns instead. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
797
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:49:00 -
[253] - Quote
Sinooko wrote:Why is it so hard to achieve symmetry!?  Because it's boring.
GÇŞand EVE doesn't have any symmetrical ships anyway, so it would be all wrong.  GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:49:00 -
[254] - Quote
Another miss teps, tier 3 BC with BS weapons. LOL Why not tech3 BCs when they have chances to create with winners of desing contests ?
|

ArmyOfMe
TEDDYBEARS. Excuses.
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:52:00 -
[255] - Quote
Right, this doesnt sound overpowerd at all
This actually makes the deimos even more screwd
CCP, for the love of god boost the deimos..... |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
75

|
Posted - 2011.10.21 18:58:00 -
[256] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
It is true! This is why I had to go home early  CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Largo Coronet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:04:00 -
[257] - Quote
Sable Moran wrote:Oh yea, almost forgot; I welcome our new tier 3 BC overlords. What next? Battleships with oversized turrets? Hmmm...
Give Marauders (mostly useless outside of PvE) the ability to carry capital guns. That should make enough heads explode
PS
Don't do this.
|

PMolkenthin
TunDraGon
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:08:00 -
[258] - Quote
That's ******* excellent!!! Looking forward to flying all of those. |

stoicfaux
313
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:12:00 -
[259] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Ranger 1 wrote: If these ships don't have any tank to speak of I don't think the Raven has much to worry about.
So it isn't a Drake with Large Missiles. Then the Drake has very little to worry about. Long Live the Drake Blob and there 90k EHP.
Drake + shield extenders rigs/modules = just the right sig size to get smacked around by a Cruise Missile or Torpedo BC.
Tinfoil. It should be at the top of everyone's food pyramid.
|

Lateris
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:14:00 -
[260] - Quote
Lovely!!! I can't wait to fly it and take some screen shots from CQ's! |
|

Jing Xin
Gravity Mining and Manufacturing Inc The Company LLC
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:19:00 -
[261] - Quote
Gimme a new railship! |

Hakaru Ishiwara
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:24:00 -
[262] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one  That's nice and all, but gimped stats are still gimped. Gallente ships have had enough nerfed over the years to render many of them impotent except in very specific scenarios.
Show us how the Gallente can shine with this new ship.
284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284 Characters 284286 |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
115
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:28:00 -
[263] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote: Drake + shield extenders rigs/modules = just the right sig size to get smacked around by a Cruise Missile or Torpedo BC.
Double the DPS half the HP. Not gonna be that hot really. Unless it's got the Resist Bonus, then there is a new god. |

London
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:33:00 -
[264] - Quote
Fuckin EPIC!  EVE: Create a Starship - Naga Frigate |

TheMercenaryKing
StarFleet Enterprises BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:38:00 -
[265] - Quote
I'm curious to know if the stats have been selected and when these may hit sisi/duality. Personally I think CCP just hit my niche of having a small Ship to gun size ratio (for those who don't know math, smaller means the weapon is closer or bigger then the ship).
But like many others, I'm really interested in what the Gallente may be, either drones or hybrids. Frankly I don't know what the Hybrid changes are yet, but as this tier will be using battle class weapons I would be safe to assume it would be Hybrids as the drone are not what i would call battle class weapons with the exception of sentry's.
And I was thinking what about caldari, would that be a Hybrid (mini Rohk) or a Missile (mini raven)?
Now for something a bit off topic.
With these 3rd tier BC are there any plans for a 2nd teir destroyer that may or may not use cruiser weapons? i would like to see those, logically the bigger the guns the more susceptible to smaller enemys. After all these BCs are susceptible to cruisers the other BCs (depending on range). |

Zim Katharsis
Shameless Sins
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:40:00 -
[266] - Quote
I guess these BCs with large guns will herald a new era of highsec-gankage. Will Freighter-Pilots now need a HG-Slave Set? ^^ |

Sergeant Marcus
Evoke. Ev0ke
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:41:00 -
[267] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6CXAaI1OAo
H U G E Guns With smosh |

Adrian Dixon
The Scope Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:55:00 -
[268] - Quote
I cant wait to see all the new ships! Th Gallente one should fit my skills perectly!!  |

Yvan Ratamnim
Phoenix Evolved Part Duo
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 19:56:00 -
[269] - Quote
Tier 3 BC's the new glass cannons, especially vs supers... YES PLEASE! |

Mongo Edwards
Royal Order of Security Specialists
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:02:00 -
[270] - Quote
I like it. Please make sure that when it leaves "work in progrss" status that it does look sufficiently different from the Myrmidon. Currently, from a distance, it looks like a red, upside down myrm flying backwards.
Eagerly awaiting what the Gallente and Caldari tier 3's look like :) |
|

wicked cheese
Imperial Research Inovations
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:02:00 -
[271] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Quote:even though the blog says its going to be the tier 3 battlecruiser i still wonder. the concept of these ships using oversized guns will be new to eve, which i one reason i doubt they will be T1. Stealth Bombers proved the concept had merit (granted, they are a T2 ship). If the concept works, and it does work well, why not introduce it to a standard Tier 3 ship as well...
i actually forgot about bombers lol
and yes you are correct they have made the transition good and not become game breaking in any way, although they have been edited several times over history. but the big difference here still remains that they are T2, so most people wouldnt be willing to throw them away on highsec ganks or 100man fleets of them.
way back in the day someone realized that missles were not limited to the size of the launcher but its capacity. the result was kestrels shooting torps. this was also pre missle nerf so your talking a handful of brand new alts could gank alot of big stuff in highsec.
now ofcourse this would have much more loss involved being a larger bc with large guns and the insurance rebalance, but it sounds like a much better option than using a bs atm. highsec ganking doesnt bother me either way but releasing a griefing machine doesnt sound the most profitable for ccp active account numbers 
no matter what tech level i look forward to flying them, as ive got all those skills to V anyways ^.^ |

Denuo Secus
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:03:00 -
[272] - Quote
Not to sound negative, in fact I'm really happy about the new BCs, but are there plans to boost (some) command ships a bit? In their current form some of them struggle to compete even with tier2 BCs. Nighthawk for instance does not offer much benefit over a Drake. Considering the price tag it's not worth to use it in PvP. Same for Abso vs. Harb I'd say.
Additional question: any news about the anounced graphics update of all the old ships. Maller was the last one. Very great work. Are there more to come in winter? |

Orion GUardian
60
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:11:00 -
[273] - Quote
Master Akira wrote:All Cruiser V, BC V, All T2 Large Specs trained crew checking in. I'll just sit here sipping my mojito until winter 
Second that, I'll love this ship |

Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:11:00 -
[274] - Quote
These need to have crap tanks if they are to be balanced. Hoefully CCP introduce these along with a nerf of tier 2 BCs to effectively unlock the line of t1 cruisers, HACs and tier 1 BCs that was made obsolete as tier 2 BCs became popular. |

engjin
The Konvergent League Shades of Gray
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:14:00 -
[275] - Quote
Congrats and again awesome work Pattern Clarc.
+1 to CCP for the work on FIS |

Sizeof Void
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:17:00 -
[276] - Quote
All for new ships, but I hope that someone is also considering rebalancing or repurposing the Tier 1 BCs - otherwise, CCP should just remove them from the game. The introduction of Tier 2 BCs already nerfed the popularity of the Tier 1 BCs from "commonly used" to "rarely seen". If the Tier 3 BCs are going to be the new uber glass cannons, then certain Tier 1 BCs (and perhaps even Tier 2 BCs), as they stand now, are going to be completely obsolete.
I refer you to the expert: http://altruist.azual.co.uk/2011/09/know-your-enemy-battlecruisers.html
In particular, I predict that the Gallente Tier 3 BC is going to be tough to balance. The Gallente already have the uber T1 gunships - the Brutix and the Megathron - slipping another T1 ship between them will be difficult, esp. with the announced buff to hybrids. The Gallente also already have the uber T1 droneships - the Myrmidon and the Dominix. There isn't much room for another T1 ship between these two either.
It would probably make more sense, from a purely game balance POV, to just upgrade the existing Tier 1 BCs to use BS class weapons. But, as I said earlier, I like new ships, too. :) |

kunniz
ISKRA-FU-0717 Paisti Syndicate
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:22:00 -
[277] - Quote
So what you did is you made tier1/2 battlecruisers completely obsolete now.
and why would you fly 150mil hac when it dies everytime to 40mil tier3 bc?
hope these new ships will be in balance somehow... |

Denuo Secus
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:23:00 -
[278] - Quote
Cpt Fina wrote:These need to have crap tanks if they are to be balanced. Hoefully CCP introduce these along with a nerf of tier 2 BCs to effectively unlock the line of t1 cruisers, HACs and tier 1 BCs that was made obsolete as tier 2 BCs became popular.
No need to nerf tier 2 BCs. They work as they are imo. Some command ships and cruisers need a boost. Nighthawk is a 10% better Drake and has fitting issues as soon a warefare link comes into play. Omen has fitting issues. Moa will work with boosted hybrids I hope. Some cruisers and HACs are just specialists...which is great. Blackbird and Caracal are good examples.
I agree tier 3 BCs should have a worse tank compared to the other BCs. If not why use them then? |

Wylee Coyote
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:29:00 -
[279] - Quote
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1496683
http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/misc/createastarship/Mentor_Battlecruiser.jpg
Mentor mentor men-tor! Mentor mentor men-tor! Pretty please... |

Sieges
University of Caille Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:30:00 -
[280] - Quote
WOW!!! That is a sweet ship!! CCP gave us ship spinning back and 4 new ships are coming? I'm all in  |
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1012
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:39:00 -
[281] - Quote
Vincent VanOgh wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:I endorse this product and/or service. And the new Gallente BC is radical. I hope by "radical" you mean "actually works" Please, let's not get our hopes up. It's a Gallente boat.
14 Day Trial wrote:you look younger... My image consultants forced me to dye my hair and use Botox-« CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Shin Dari
The Vendunari Warped Aggression
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 20:59:00 -
[282] - Quote
Cpt Fina wrote:These need to have crap tanks if they are to be balanced. Hoefully CCP introduce these along with a nerf of tier 2 BCs to effectively unlock the line of t1 cruisers, HACs and tier 1 BCs that was made obsolete as tier 2 BCs became popular. I don't agree with you, tier 1 BC are very cost effective.
kunniz wrote:So what you did is you made tier1/2 battlecruisers completely obsolete now.
and why would you fly 150mil hac when it dies everytime to 40mil tier3 bc?
hope these new ships will be in balance somehow... Frigates will eat tier 3 BC for lunch.
|

John McCreedy
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:05:00 -
[283] - Quote
Amsterdam Conversations wrote:Mr Hurricane, your days are counted.
This is actually a really good point. Please be careful with the balancing so that it doesn't render the cane useless. |

Trillian Stargazer
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:10:00 -
[284] - Quote
<3 ccp. |

MisterNick
The Sagan Clan Pax Romana Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:12:00 -
[285] - Quote
Time I finally got around to training Battlecruisers V I guess  "Fools! I'll show them all!"
What do you mean that one's already taken? |

Disturbed Lucy
Zim and Lucy's excellent adventure
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:14:00 -
[286] - Quote
large guns can't track frigates and fast / close orbiting cruiser-sized ships. Tier 1+2 Battlecruisers won't be obsolete imho. The Tier 3 BCs will be a nice addition to cost-effective BC-Gangs (Tech 1 => insurance). |

Zelphinine
OCTAGON Conglomerate
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:16:00 -
[287] - Quote
How about a Caldari gunship that actually had real DPS?
I guess that's the domain of Gallente ships but still. I'd like hybrids to not be pointless lolfit jokes for Caldari. :( |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:44:00 -
[288] - Quote
Shin Dari wrote:Cpt Fina wrote:These need to have crap tanks if they are to be balanced. Hoefully CCP introduce these along with a nerf of tier 2 BCs to effectively unlock the line of t1 cruisers, HACs and tier 1 BCs that was made obsolete as tier 2 BCs became popular. I don't agree with you, tier 1 BC are very cost effective. kunniz wrote:So what you did is you made tier1/2 battlecruisers completely obsolete now.
and why would you fly 150mil hac when it dies everytime to 40mil tier3 bc?
hope these new ships will be in balance somehow... Frigates will eat tier 3 BC for lunch.
what like assault frigs? |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
117
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 21:57:00 -
[289] - Quote
TOO MUCH EXCITEMENT |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
320
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:03:00 -
[290] - Quote
Easy way to make sure these don't become and all too cheap gank ship rendering high sec essentially lawless is to make them tech 2 battlecruisers. Take away the cheap. |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
799
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:05:00 -
[291] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:Easy way to make sure these don't become and all too cheap gank ship rendering high sec essentially lawlessGÇŞ GÇŞbut why would you make sure of that? 
GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Szilardis
Cryogenic Creations
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:09:00 -
[292] - Quote
Can this come with a buff to Tier 1 BCs that make them more useful, then? |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
320
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:12:00 -
[293] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Jada Maroo wrote:Easy way to make sure these don't become and all too cheap gank ship rendering high sec essentially lawlessGÇŞ GÇŞbut why would you make sure of that? 
Because I doubt CCP wants to drive off a significant portion of their players by rendering their home uninhabitable. Believe me, I'd rather have it be a cheap, fun ship. But if the end result is that you can barely fly anything through high sec? Nope. Sorry, it might not be perfect security space, but it's still supposed to be high. And these ships will make it chaotic if they're cheap. |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:17:00 -
[294] - Quote
Hmm. Wonder if it'll have an ROF penalty, like Destroyers. |

Havegun Willtravel
Mobile Alcohol Processing Units
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:41:00 -
[295] - Quote
Pocket Battle Ship was the term of choice back in the day. A Heavy Cruiser hull with Battle Ship guns. In their time they were often refered to as the ' Terror of the Sea's' for their unmatched combination of speed and destructive power.
Glad I hate sking cause i know where i'll be all winter.
Muahahaah a Myrm with heavy neutrons. I feel th love already. |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE Limitless Inc.
174
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 22:55:00 -
[296] - Quote
Very interesting. Funnily, just as some of my characters were finishing the final large t2 bs weapons.. this is a signature |

Dalilus
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 23:15:00 -
[297] - Quote
And here I was ready to leave EVE for Skyrim.....thank you CCP. A cane with BS guns...thank you!
On another mater, any possibility of un nerfing the speed nerf of Minnie ships?  |

Jarin Arenos
Pawn Brokers
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 23:16:00 -
[298] - Quote
I know the similarity has been pointed out, but putting them side by side...
Well, let's just say that the MInmatar seem to have a new trade agreement with the Gallente.
Tornado design comparison |

Floydd Heywood
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.21 23:57:00 -
[299] - Quote
This should be interesting. Although I mourn a little for my beloved battleships. The smaller ships are already better in most situations, and also cheaper. Now there will be speedy new small ships that combine the firepower of battleships with the agility of battlecruisers, making battleships even less important.
However... happy me, who has skilled BC V and 2 Large Turrets. I should be well prepared to adapt :) |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:08:00 -
[300] - Quote
Shin Dari wrote:Cpt Fina wrote:These need to have crap tanks if they are to be balanced. Hoefully CCP introduce these along with a nerf of tier 2 BCs to effectively unlock the line of t1 cruisers, HACs and tier 1 BCs that was made obsolete as tier 2 BCs became popular. I don't agree with you, tier 1 BC are very cost effective. kunniz wrote:So what you did is you made tier1/2 battlecruisers completely obsolete now.
and why would you fly 150mil hac when it dies everytime to 40mil tier3 bc?
hope these new ships will be in balance somehow... Frigates will eat tier 3 BC for lunch.
not if the tier 3 has a drone bay they wont Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
|

Tyme Xandr
State Protectorate Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:20:00 -
[301] - Quote
So after reading through page after page of either rejoice or tears/horror I decided maybe it was time for an intelligent post that can maybe spark some intelligent conversation.
Facts: Tier 3 BC Large Weapon Systems Low Ability to Tank
Intelligent Assumptions (if those things exist)
Due to this ship being able to fit Large Weapons it could naturally be assumed that since they are not a battleship they wont be able to fit a whole rack. Lets presume 4-5 weapon slots with 2-3 maybe 4 utility slots. This would keep the need for Battleship's as they can hold full racks of large weapons. Ex: Tornado can fit 4 or 5 800's, use the utilities for neuts. Caldaris can fit 4-5 torps, the rest can be neuts or spider shield mods.
Their bonus will be towards fitting, much like Stealth Bombers have bonuses to allow Torps to be equipped despite their fitting ability. Example: 69.65% reduction in Large Projectile Weapon systems powergrid needs. (I made that number from thin air as I dont assume itll be like SB's 99.65% reduction.
Low tank ability makes me think they will have reduced low/mid slots. This will diminish the ability of Armor tankers to fit tracking/dmg mods and shield tankers diminished ability to shield tank/tackle. They will pick one or the other or try to even out between the two making them only somewhat average in both respects.
So this appears to sound like a pretty balanced ship that wont be the WTF pwnmobile. Theyre still large weapons which means smaller sig ships/faster ships can outrun siege missiles and waver away from tracking of large guns. The ships wont be overtanked as they will have lowered tanking ability (RP element of using more space/systems/power for large weapons). |

Raneru
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:21:00 -
[302] - Quote
This is the first new addition for a long time that I've been excited to try out. Sounds awesome!  |

Kassasis Dakkstromri
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
37
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:22:00 -
[303] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please!
GOD NO!
Fast Fleets need insta damage --- buy the time anything 'missile' related is shot the target will be popped.
And I say this even with having deficient gunner skills :( |

Kassasis Dakkstromri
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
37
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:37:00 -
[304] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Does anyone else see these new BCs getting eaten up by swarms of smaller ships?
"Captain! Tordado sighted dead ahead!"
"Send in the assault frigates!"
Short answer: Yes! |

Crazy KSK
Tsunami Cartel Dark Solar Empire
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 00:51:00 -
[305] - Quote
Please CCP! Give those ships their own class!
they are not Battlecruisers! battlecruisers are ships with 5-7 medium guns! |

Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated New Eden Research.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 01:00:00 -
[306] - Quote
Wow, first Hilmar coming totally clean, and now CCP actually using a fanart contest ship model, it's almost like you're listening to your customers again. You guys are scaring me! :) In a good way.
Keep up the excellent work, CCP!
-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP |

Relicc
Aideron Robotics
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 01:04:00 -
[307] - Quote
I said, hell yeaaa |

Gevlin
SMANews.net SpaceMonkey's Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 01:39:00 -
[308] - Quote
Can you say Primary target?
this is ship that should work.
Now this opens up a possible Destroyer that goes by the same theme
|

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
321
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 01:40:00 -
[309] - Quote
Gevlin wrote:Can you say Primary target?
this is ship that should work.
Now this opens up a possible Destroyer that goes by the same theme
Why not just do this to the existing destroyers and make them useful? |

Gobann Muraco
Confederation Navy Research Epsilon Fleet
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 02:42:00 -
[310] - Quote
One potential gankship is enough for now! |
|

Lili Lu
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 03:11:00 -
[311] - Quote

More caek for dumbing down the game.
Seriously another BC? Why should anyone train HACs or Commands?
Tech III cruisers and now these. Are you going to buff HACs and Command ships to compensate? |

Augin Soric
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 03:29:00 -
[312] - Quote
I don't care if it turns out to perform like crap in a can, that design is way too cool to not want to fly. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 03:31:00 -
[313] - Quote
Lili Lu wrote: More caek for dumbing down the game. Seriously another BC? Why should anyone train HACs or Commands? Tech III cruisers and now these. Are you going to buff HACs and Command ships to compensate?
If they make them as stated, agile yet poorly tanked large gun platforms, they should end up fearing HAC's. field commands may be another story, but they will still have a tracking advantage.
Infact it hardly seems like dumbing of anything. These, if done right, will need to be very target selective. |

Grady Eltoren
Aviation Professionals for EVE
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 03:41:00 -
[314] - Quote
Hail to the king baby!
Oh and I ...
ji##ed in my pants.
|

Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad Broken Chains Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 04:11:00 -
[315] - Quote
 omg, after this, who needs p*rn? |

Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad Broken Chains Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 04:16:00 -
[316] - Quote
Kassasis Dakkstromri wrote:Ingvar Angst wrote:Does anyone else see these new BCs getting eaten up by swarms of smaller ships?
"Captain! Tornado sighted dead ahead!"
"Send in the assault frigates!" Short answer: Yes!
as BCA's resident Frigate Goddess, i can get behind that tactic!
still... i'd *almost* hate to kill it! that thing is sexy as hell!
|

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 04:23:00 -
[317] - Quote
Kassasis Dakkstromri wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:I love it!!!!
Please have the Caldari one be Missiles. Please! GOD NO! Fast Fleets need insta damage --- buy the time anything 'missile' related is shot the target will be popped. And I say this even with having deficient gunner skills :( Yes because Drakes are not popular as Fleet Ships.
Cruise Missiles move at the exact same speed as Heavy Missiles.
|

Imawuss
Black Ice Protectorate The Imperial Senate
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 04:58:00 -
[318] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. The Gallente ship is really freakin gorgeous. You may need a change of pants when we showcase that one 
So i will be really sad when it just sits in my hangar because Hybrids are utter crap. No tank on a blaster boat...... yah see how that works out for yah. Railguns on anything for pvp...... Perhaps i could open up a dent repair shop and advertise to everyone that pops me.
Unless its a drone boat of sorts it will be sub-par, but the Myrmidon already has that covered. (Funny that ships works better with autocannons...) |

Chevalleis
The Legendary Conquest THE D0MINION
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 05:12:00 -
[319] - Quote
Off to train minnie bc, then. |

RC Denton
Wages Of Sin
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 05:20:00 -
[320] - Quote
Looks Awesome! Sounds Awesome! Gonna be Awesome!
In before it gets nerfed  |
|

Szilardis
Cryogenic Creations
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 05:31:00 -
[321] - Quote
Chevalleis wrote:Off to train minnie bc, then.
Confirming racial BC skills exist. |

Mirta Vanderkill
AfterMath. Broken Toys
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 05:40:00 -
[322] - Quote
What would be really amazing is if they had a rack of 8, but could only fire in a 180 degree arc in front of the ship.
Said another way, make it so a fleet of these will have to be flying directly TOWARDS their target to hit. |

Alundil
The Unnamed. Novum Militis ExParte
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 06:01:00 -
[323] - Quote
Jarin Arenos wrote:I know the similarity has been pointed out, but putting them side by side... Well, let's just say that the MInmatar seem to have a new trade agreement with the Gallente. Tornado design comparison
Nice comparison....brings to mind:
"Minmatar, flying them backwards since forever" |

Venkul Mul
Vikramaditya
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 07:35:00 -
[324] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:Able to fit L guns but not enough pg for L repair stuff, I suppose that means a cruiser-like powergrid with a role bonus to weapon powergrid. And fast cap recharge, or the amarr one will run dry fast.
Sound very nice, BS-like dps and range without massive plating or active tanking. But I wonder if they really have a place in the present meta-gaming. Against another BC gang built around Hurricanes/Drakes, L weapon tracking might be too much of a problem to be compensated by a bit more dps. Against the current Abbadon blobs, the BS's buffer tank would give them an overwhelming advantage.
We'll need to do some math once the stats are known, I suppose. But I predict the shield-based ones (and Tornado in particualr) will be overpowered because the very low PG requirement of large sheld extenders and autocanons will still allow them to have a respectable passive buffer.
If it is cheap enough, he will be a perfect tool for suicide ganking. A lot of DPS against largish sized targets, no need for any tank. |

Nick Bison
Bison Industrial Inc Thundering Herd
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 07:37:00 -
[325] - Quote
So, what I'm hearing is: BC Tank + BB Firepower = Pocket Battleship!
Gank On! (at an affordable price)
 |

Raw Matters
KRAUTZ RULEZ KRAUTZ-FEDERATION
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 07:48:00 -
[326] - Quote
Now CCP just needs to get the price right on this thing, with all the T2 components being shot by Goons and others, and I am happy.
I know why I've chosen Minmatar... 'cause OVERSIZED GUNS FIT ON MY BATTLECRUISER!! *mharhar* |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
804
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 09:03:00 -
[327] - Quote
Nick Bison wrote:So, what I'm hearing is: BC Tank + BB Firepower = Pocket Battleship! I sure hope not, since that would mean that we don't get any net additions of ships to the gameGÇŞ GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇŁIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇĄ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Draahk Chimera
Interstellar eXodus
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 10:02:00 -
[328] - Quote
The Tornado, while massively cool, will mean the definitive end for battleships in 0.0 fleet warfare. Burn out of enemy range and spew 1400mm Howitzer II -love on the enemy. [IMG]http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/s302/nattravn/EVE/draakhchimeranaglfar.png[/IMG] |

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries Alliance not Found
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 10:05:00 -
[329] - Quote
So... Wait, what?!?
Rather than sliding it neatly into the Battleship line-up as a second Tier 3 with E-War effects or making it a Minmatar/Caldari Faction ship along the Pirate faction ship lines it's going into a class which is already perceived as containing several redundant ships...
Not only that but it's going to fit BS sized weapons (which IIRC was one of the more frequently raised arguments for nerfing the Myrmidon down to 75Mb of Bandwidth and therefore damage roughly equivalent to a Vexor) which will allow Alpha strike doctrines (already the most boring type of combat) for significantly lower cost and with significantly higher agility.
It's not like Tier 3 BS are inaccessible or rare, so exposure wouldn't be an issue... |

bldyannoyed
Estrale Frontiers
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 10:30:00 -
[330] - Quote
Can't wait.
Lets be realistic though, as long as CCp aren't going completely bonkers mental these things AREN'T going to be the BC obsoleting solo pwnmachines every seems to be scared of. Their tank and DPS output isn't even really the issue.
As long as these things have zero drone bay (meaning the Gallente one will ofc have to be hybrid based) and zero utility high slots the ships will, moreso than any other sub capital in the game, be entirely reliant on a support fleet. With no drones or utilities they would have next to no hope against cruisers and smaller.
In this context they can have the same tank as a current BC and the same dps output of a BS and still not be solo boats. I don't think for a moment they will have either of those things but it doesn't matter as long as CCP make sure they cannot defend themselves against smaller (cruiser sized) vessels. |
|

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:15:00 -
[331] - Quote
Alundil wrote:Jarin Arenos wrote:I know the similarity has been pointed out, but putting them side by side... Well, let's just say that the MInmatar seem to have a new trade agreement with the Gallente. Tornado design comparison Nice comparison....brings to mind: "Minmatar, flying them backwards since forever"
He wrong here is the other designs from design contest.
http://news.deviantart.com/article/133951/
|

KFenn
Percussive Diplomacy
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:18:00 -
[332] - Quote
**** YES I TRAINED BC5 NOT LONG AGO.
+1 for finally putting this in game. Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade SLAPD Director |

Bomberlocks
CTRL-Q
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:29:00 -
[333] - Quote
Ugleb wrote:While cool, doesn't a BC dealing BS-level damage kind of make BS more irrelevant? You get the damage output without the price tag on a faster more manoeuvrable ship. Ok its not as tough, there is going to be more of these on the field to do the melting, right?
Conceptually it seems to be a step towards further cementing BC dominance on the field. Bit bothered by that.
Please do not give these large weapon BC's any sort of tracking bonus. 'Glass cannons' might be a good design principle here. These ships will be vulnerable to frigates, destroyers (dictors) and cruisers (hacs and recons). |

KFenn
Percussive Diplomacy
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:33:00 -
[334] - Quote
Bomberlocks wrote:Ugleb wrote:While cool, doesn't a BC dealing BS-level damage kind of make BS more irrelevant? You get the damage output without the price tag on a faster more manoeuvrable ship. Ok its not as tough, there is going to be more of these on the field to do the melting, right?
Conceptually it seems to be a step towards further cementing BC dominance on the field. Bit bothered by that.
Please do not give these large weapon BC's any sort of tracking bonus. 'Glass cannons' might be a good design principle here. These ships will be vulnerable to frigates, destroyers (dictors) and cruisers (hacs and recons).
This. AHAC gangs will be more effective against these than they are against BS gangs. Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade SLAPD Director |

RLCHANCE
The Shadow Cartel DUST ALLIANCE
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:36:00 -
[335] - Quote
Lord Meriak wrote:I can see alot of cap issue's with 2 races..
thow gal really really on drones. amarr need a buff and soon
Dont forget 'Caldari' there in more need of an buffing than amarr lol i know i fly amarr and there just about right :)
|

Salvia Olima
FREE GATES HUN Reloaded
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:38:00 -
[336] - Quote
It is a Tornado, a minmatar T3 battlecruiser. |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE Limitless Inc.
174
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:49:00 -
[337] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:That's a bullcrap to be honest. To begin with, the very need in such a ship can only arise if the game is OVERTANKED. You were boosting HPs several times back in 2006 and later introduced current fubar rig scheme which clearly promotes tank over anything else (50 calibration per EHP rig which aren't even stacking penalized; 200 calibration per damage rig which is stacking penalized and is a lot harder to cram in due to increased PG usage - LOL?) Quote:The concept is; violent, fast and fun. So now you ******* admit the game was spoilt back then. And instead of addressing the CORE ISSUE (overtank) you decide to 'mask' it with a new ship, which Quote:[10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face most likely will become a new FOTY and overpowered to the brim? Instead of rebalancing existing stuff (like tier2 BCs; tech3; CS) you decide to widen the gap in popularity between proper ships and dirt-cheap OP crap even further? How cute.
Pretty good post Fon, you highlight one thing: does CCP have a vision/clear view of development, or are they still just producing :toys: with no real thought behind?
One thing tho, regarding the 'overpowered', and other peoples comment about 'why fly other bc'. Well, for one, bc's of today have cruiser sized weapons and hit frigates/cruisers quite well. Will these new ships do? If CCP's blog comment about these new ship producing battleship dps, then we can assume they can fit the largest weapons too. A torp-bc, or 1400mm bc, or tachyon/megapulse bc, or lolblastersheh bc - either hitting frigates/cruisers?
There'll be scenarios where these new ships will be damn powerful, but a roaming gang of these will still die to a bunch of frigs, or a well armed POS, or a blob with tackle support, etc. It won't take long before we see fleets of 40-50 of these dying to ten frigs, a single dictor and scimitar.. this is a signature |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:52:00 -
[338] - Quote
I forsee a lot of explosions!
With be so much loot around with these new tier 3 BCs \o/ |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 11:57:00 -
[339] - Quote
@ CCP
I've got some questions for you guys.
Has we can easily see BC's are the powerhouse's of Eve, way overpowered to the point they obsolete BS's in many situations sending BS's at "shoot pve rats" or alpha doctrines with only half of the existent ones can do the job, not even trying to bring BO's, let's keep it Tech 1
Why didn't you guys kept the design of "big guns to shoot ya face" and give it to Tiers 3 BS's instead?
Pretty sure BS's full racks of capital guns would make the cleanup of all those supers/titans around with no need to nerf super in the process, but you've chosen to go for battle cruisers. Those will be expensive to fit, to produce=buy, at least almost that much than BS's just more mobile and with less tank, witch can already be done by nano/shield tank almost every BS.
Do you really think those will counter the "tanky glass canon" blob/fleets or on the contrary they will bring new blobs setups? (hi sign radius, shoot range and more logistics)
Thx
Also: In behalf of my self -how do you expect Gallente counterpart to be on pair with his new friends when it uses the shortest range weapon system, shortest for about 250% at least than any other, or will gallente stick with: sucks even shooting nuclear warheads because can't get in range or shoot far enough to scratch paint? |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
47
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 12:09:00 -
[340] - Quote
Tyme Xandr wrote:So after reading through page after page of either rejoice or tears/horror I decided maybe it was time for an intelligent post that can maybe spark some intelligent conversation.
Facts: Tier 3 BC Large Weapon Systems Low Ability to Tank
Intelligent Assumptions (if those things exist)
Due to this ship being able to fit Large Weapons it could naturally be assumed that since they are not a battleship they wont be able to fit a whole rack. Lets presume 4-5 weapon slots with 2-3 maybe 4 utility slots. This would keep the need for Battleship's as they can hold full racks of large weapons. Ex: Tornado can fit 4 or 5 800's, use the utilities for neuts. Caldaris can fit 4-5 torps, the rest can be neuts or spider shield mods.
Their bonus will be towards fitting, much like Stealth Bombers have bonuses to allow Torps to be equipped despite their fitting ability. Example: 69.65% reduction in Large Projectile Weapon systems powergrid needs. (I made that number from thin air as I dont assume itll be like SB's 99.65% reduction.
Low tank ability makes me think they will have reduced low/mid slots. This will diminish the ability of Armor tankers to fit tracking/dmg mods and shield tankers diminished ability to shield tank/tackle. They will pick one or the other or try to even out between the two making them only somewhat average in both respects.
So this appears to sound like a pretty balanced ship that wont be the WTF pwnmobile. Theyre still large weapons which means smaller sig ships/faster ships can outrun siege missiles and waver away from tracking of large guns. The ships wont be overtanked as they will have lowered tanking ability (RP element of using more space/systems/power for large weapons).
Why would you use some ship with less tank than regular BC, with half guns rack one BS can fit when all you have to do is shield nano fit your BS, rig it for dps, FULL FIT YOUR RACK OF GUNS, and still have decent tank? |
|

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE Limitless Inc.
174
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 12:11:00 -
[341] - Quote
Laktos wrote:DJ Xaphod wrote:Spyker Slater wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote: Caught in a landslide.
No escape from reality Open your eyes Look up to the sky? and see
I'm just a poor boy, I need no sympathy this is a signature |

Disturbed Lucy
Zim and Lucy's excellent adventure
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 12:31:00 -
[342] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Laktos wrote:DJ Xaphod wrote:Spyker Slater wrote:Maul555 wrote:
No escape from reality
Open your eyes Look up to the sky? and see I'm just a poor boy, I need no sympathy
because I'm easy come easy go little high little low |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 12:35:00 -
[343] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:That's a bullcrap to be honest. To begin with, the very need in such a ship can only arise if the game is OVERTANKED. You were boosting HPs several times back in 2006 and later introduced current fubar rig scheme which clearly promotes tank over anything else (50 calibration per EHP rig which aren't even stacking penalized; 200 calibration per damage rig which is stacking penalized and is a lot harder to cram in due to increased PG usage - LOL?) Quote:The concept is; violent, fast and fun. So now you ******* admit the game was spoilt back then. And instead of addressing the CORE ISSUE (overtank) you decide to 'mask' it with a new ship, which Quote:[10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face most likely will become a new FOTY and overpowered to the brim? Instead of rebalancing existing stuff (like tier2 BCs; tech3; CS) you decide to widen the gap in popularity between proper ships and dirt-cheap OP crap even further? How cute. Pretty good post Fon, you highlight one thing: does CCP have a vision/clear view of development, or are they still just producing :toys: with no real thought behind? One thing tho, regarding the 'overpowered', and other peoples comment about 'why fly other bc'. Well, for one, bc's of today have cruiser sized weapons and hit frigates/cruisers quite well. Will these new ships do? If CCP's blog comment about these new ship producing battleship dps, then we can assume they can fit the largest weapons too. A torp-bc, or 1400mm bc, or tachyon/megapulse bc, or lolblastersheh bc - either hitting frigates/cruisers? There'll be scenarios where these new ships will be damn powerful, but a roaming gang of these will still die to a bunch of frigs, or a well armed POS, or a blob with tackle support, etc. It won't take long before we see fleets of 40-50 of these dying to ten frigs, a single dictor and scimitar..
I'm pretty sure they don't have any clear vision on what they're doing. I mean, come one, you guys could have easily redifined TIER 1 (!) battlecruisers to fit this newly invented role and NO ONE would have noticed their absence in their own class of complete fail. Alright, Cyclone is somewhat different, but the remaining 3 are utterly pointless. Brutix? Come on, get a Cane instead.
I surely might be mistaken and they may indeed be doing some hidden work to rebalance current broken stuff, but somehow I'm sceptical about it. Dramiel and Logistics changes were announced like 5 (?) months ago and what exactly have we got so far? Nothing. And these are merely 2 minor issues.
It's only few months left prior to next expansion and even if they do release some balancing plans we're unlikely to get them properly tested.
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is" 2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?" Nice progress, guys. |

Kalot Sakaar
CragCO
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 13:25:00 -
[344] - Quote
I can almost already guess at the description and bonuses to the Gallente Ship:
"Another in a long line of great looking ships that absolutely fails to perform. This is no exception to a long line of ships that are exceptionally slow, unable to control range, and general fails to meet up to expectations.
5% bonus to slowness per level and a 7.5% armor repair bonus per level.
Role Bonus: Can use oversized guns giving a whopping 5km of optimal range."
ya, that looks about right.... |

Vanakov Mek'lanavar
Furnulum pani nolo THE SPACE P0LICE
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 13:45:00 -
[345] - Quote
This devblog made me log in today.
for two minutes. |

Slighet
Siempre Muerto
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 13:49:00 -
[346] - Quote
As someone who mostly flies drakes, I'd just like to say, please nerf drakes a little rather than just introducing new uber-drakes. We need existing ships to be competitive more than we need new ships.
Having said that, as long as they don't just introduce a new drake-style FOTM, I like the idea of the new tier 3 BCs a lot. |

Brazero
Noble House
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 13:51:00 -
[347] - Quote
They should introduce a new BC class of turrets. |

Narjack
CragCO
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 14:29:00 -
[348] - Quote
Kalot Sakaar wrote:I can almost already guess at the description and bonuses to the Gallente Ship:
"Another in a long line of great looking ships that absolutely fails to perform. This is no exception to a long line of ships that are exceptionally slow, unable to control range, and general fails to meet up to expectations.
5% bonus to slowness per level and a 7.5% armor repair bonus per level.
Role Bonus: Can use oversized guns giving a whopping 5km of optimal range."
ya, that looks about right....
I just about spit my coffee out reading this one. Pretty funny, mostly because its so accurate. Can't wait to see yet another Gal ship with that awesome 7.5% armor repair bonus. Lol.
CCP, will these ship be able to mount command mods? |

Bhaal Chinnian
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 14:39:00 -
[349] - Quote
ty CCP for introducing a new flavor of ships which should freshen up the game a bit, and provide yet more diversity of fleet composition. My guess, in regards to the BS turrets, is that these new BCs won't be able to fit more than 3 or 4 of them so their dps will stay in line with current BCs which can field ~6. The advantage ,in the end, would only be range.
/2cents |

Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express Intrepid Crossing
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:02:00 -
[350] - Quote
I like the idea and have advocated a heavy cruiser/battlecruiser along these lines for a while.
|
|

Alexandria Aesirial
Masons of New Eden The Laughing Men
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:20:00 -
[351] - Quote
I can't wait for the new drake with torps!!! OMG OMG OMG!!! |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:28:00 -
[352] - Quote
So pocket Battleships
Im looking forward to see their stats
and also bet someone will name his one Graff Spee I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:34:00 -
[353] - Quote
Tier 3 is kinda meh dose should be Tactical BC's or assault BC's...
i still think that those ships would be more suited for BS class as kind sir that created ship stated,they just lost much "umph" scaling down to class that have issues as is.i mean cyclone/cane/brutix/harb are all boomsticks and then there are noob friendly draek/amarr bird thingy and mirm for tank..i du no why another boomstick there...all races tier 3 ewar/dps BS sound more appealing to me...cant wait to fly a ship anyway. |

Liberty Belle
Red Brangus Unlimited S I L E N T.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 16:02:00 -
[354] - Quote
This is an exciing addition.
his works well with the changes to Supercarriers and making Custom Offices player owned and destructible.... I wouldn't call the tier 3 BC revolutionary, but I can see many uses, some even pivotal.
I can't wait to get my hands on these blueprints! |

SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
138
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 16:12:00 -
[355] - Quote
Peoples should be reminded that when you fit large turrets, you get poor tracking aswell.
If those tier 3 BCs get large guns and no drones, well, I can solopwn one with my Wolf. |

Mal Nina
The Red Circle Inc.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 16:29:00 -
[356] - Quote
Awesome cool a tech 3 BC oh wait... thats Tech 1/tier 3... I was soooo excited, not that this isn't good... its just not great
But all said, it puts BCs in there traditional naval role which I approve and that said makes a great addition to go with those new customs offices. I mean what better tool to blow them up with. And think of the wonderful fun of HS ganks on carebears, no longer is a costly BS necessary. Gwoonswarm must be swooning with glee (well it will in all probablility make a great ganker) I like the idea, now CCP, take it to the next level in the next year. Tech 3 BCs to give that BC class a little more love and something to train for. 
I do think alot of players will enjoy this one, but I was really saddened I read the initial write up wrong, sort of took the thrill right out of me.
|

zero2espect
ZERO HEAVY INDUSTRIES
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:16:00 -
[357] - Quote
i like the idea but it's the wrong class of ship. i would have preferred to see the same done on destoyers to make a 4 hislot "torpedo boat".
tbh this will be the new blob weapon of choice, think remote repped absolutions with 3x the firepower.
at least if it was done on smaller ships, it becomes a more fun ship to fly (with higher risk of getting killed) without the repercussions to blob warfare.
|

Largo Coronet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:44:00 -
[358] - Quote
zero2espect, technically the Stealth Bomber already takes the torpedo boat role. Small, light, fast, and carrying weapons completely out of proportion for it's size.
Alexandria Aesirial wrote:I can't wait for the new drake with torps!!! OMG OMG OMG!!! I'll take a bet that the new Caldari BC will NOT be a missile boat for just what this suggests. Probably a mix of weapons, or possibly a dedicated railgunner like the Rokh BS. If it DOES become "a Drake with torps," then it will be a ridiculously overpowered ship. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
127
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:50:00 -
[359] - Quote
ok my opinion ;
Seems fun and i think probably will add to both the roaminggang and the blob , but we don't know any stats yet so people will have to wait for while ..... so where and how to use this new ship ,? guess we all anxious awaiting the next devblog
I also see this become the ship to use for suicide ganks, but i think that is a minor issue, tho alot of miners will be annoyed by it I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad Broken Chains Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 17:57:00 -
[360] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality
Open your eyes |
|

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE Limitless Inc.
174
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 18:11:00 -
[361] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Misanth wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:That's a bullcrap to be honest. To begin with, the very need in such a ship can only arise if the game is OVERTANKED. You were boosting HPs several times back in 2006 and later introduced current fubar rig scheme which clearly promotes tank over anything else (50 calibration per EHP rig which aren't even stacking penalized; 200 calibration per damage rig which is stacking penalized and is a lot harder to cram in due to increased PG usage - LOL?) Quote:The concept is; violent, fast and fun. So now you ******* admit the game was spoilt back then. And instead of addressing the CORE ISSUE (overtank) you decide to 'mask' it with a new ship, which Quote:[10:32:15 AM] CCP Guard: The Tornado will nerf the drake [10:32:16 AM] CCP Guard: In the face most likely will become a new FOTY and overpowered to the brim? Instead of rebalancing existing stuff (like tier2 BCs; tech3; CS) you decide to widen the gap in popularity between proper ships and dirt-cheap OP crap even further? How cute. Pretty good post Fon, you highlight one thing: does CCP have a vision/clear view of development, or are they still just producing :toys: with no real thought behind? One thing tho, regarding the 'overpowered', and other peoples comment about 'why fly other bc'. Well, for one, bc's of today have cruiser sized weapons and hit frigates/cruisers quite well. Will these new ships do? If CCP's blog comment about these new ship producing battleship dps, then we can assume they can fit the largest weapons too. A torp-bc, or 1400mm bc, or tachyon/megapulse bc, or lolblastersheh bc - either hitting frigates/cruisers? There'll be scenarios where these new ships will be damn powerful, but a roaming gang of these will still die to a bunch of frigs, or a well armed POS, or a blob with tackle support, etc. It won't take long before we see fleets of 40-50 of these dying to ten frigs, a single dictor and scimitar.. I'm pretty sure they don't have any clear vision on what they're doing. I mean, come on, you guys could have easily redifined TIER 1 (!) battlecruisers to fit this newly invented role and NO ONE would have noticed their absence in their own class of complete fail. Alright, Cyclone is somewhat different, but the remaining 3 are utterly pointless. Brutix? Come on, get a Cane instead. I surely might be mistaken and they may indeed be doing some hidden work to rebalance current broken stuff, but somehow I'm sceptical about it. Dramiel and Logistics changes were announced like 5 (?) months ago and what exactly have we got so far? Nothing. And these are merely 2 minor issues. It's only few months left prior to next expansion and even if they do release some balancing plans we're unlikely to get them properly tested.
..and then we got the Command Ships too. But yes, I agree.
To be honest, I think this new BC can be pretty fun, and I am assuming (hoping) it will be countered by smaller ships. Plus, it can't tank alpha like a trimarked BS anyway so for fleet action it's gonna be 'too weak' in certain situations (and almost cost as much as a BS, considering the guns). But what's worrying is exactly what we mention, that it seems CCP more 'throw out toys' rather than having a vision and working after that. And what about current content? as you mention. this is a signature |

Danny Centauri
Baltic Eagle
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 18:34:00 -
[362] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Actually, I could see this be the start of a whole new generation of ship design.
High tier tech 1 ships designed to use weapon system of the next higher class ship. Powerful, but very vulnerable.
High tier tech 2 ships designed to use weapon systems of ships 2 classes higher. (LIke the stealth bomber, highly specialized but extremely vulnerable.)
It wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility to design high tier Tech 1 ships (or redesign existing lower tier Tech 1 ships) around weapons systems that normally fit on 1 ship class LOWER than themselves, with bonuses to make the weapons extremely effective vs. smaller targets.... but rather ineffective against their own class or higher.
With that last bit, I'm talking specialized bonus/abillities to maximize combat performance, not just slapping small guns on a cruiser or BC.
Hmmmm, this might warrant some serious thought...
Also the other way around battleships with medium gun bonus, this could prove extremely interesting. Specialised cruisers for killing frigates, BCs for cruisers and BS for BCs. They would be expensive to do the job and slower than what they are fighting but with increased survivability may prove very interesting. Great combinatiion to fight BC gangs using them alongside logistics etc.
Also would make for a much more diverse EVE universe. |

7Cai
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 19:51:00 -
[363] - Quote
Please, please use the Naru-kami for caldari or even galente... especially that it took 2nd place... |

Myz Toyou
the Organ Grinder and Company Higginbotham and Bailey's Circus
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 19:58:00 -
[364] - Quote
Yazzinra wrote: i loves my myrmidon. Any clue if this will be an upgrade, or a sidegrade?
i can haz pictur plz?
They will turn the Myrmidon just up side down 
btw, BC 5, all races cruiser 5, all large guns specced crew checkin in , what ever ship gonna be imba, I-¦m on it  |

SidneyB
Mercenaries 4 Hire BLACK-MARK
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 19:58:00 -
[365] - Quote
Shaera Taam wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote:DJ P0N-3 wrote:Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy? Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality Open your eyes
Look up to the skies and see |

Kerri Desdemonia
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 20:32:00 -
[366] - Quote
For the other three races please please please:
Amarr: http://browse.deviantart.com/contests/2010/eveonline/?order=24&offset=384#/d30lvt3
Caldari: http://browse.deviantart.com/contests/2010/eveonline/?order=24&offset=168#/d30h8af
Gallente: http://browse.deviantart.com/contests/2010/eveonline/#/d2yt8lk
All three have extended hulls (makes sense for mechanic spaces for the bigger guns. the Tornado is extended also, but vertically like the minnie dread so cool) and seem like extensions of existing designs (the similarity to the Archon for Amarr, the reworking of the rokh so it doesn't look like a bloody sidearm, and another cool looking bulbous ship with apparent command tower above like the Hyperion and Obelisk.)
Please make the Caldari one a TURRET based ship FFS! |

Cloora
APEX Unlimited APEX Conglomerate
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 20:35:00 -
[367] - Quote
SidneyB wrote:Shaera Taam wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote:Ydnari wrote: Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide. No escape from reality Open your eyes Look up to the skies and see
I'm just a poor boy. CEO and Major ShareholderAPEX ConglomerateMaker of Starsi softdrinks and Torped-Os! Cerealhttp://www.altaholics.blogspot.com |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 21:12:00 -
[368] - Quote
My guesses for other races-
AMARR CALDARI GALLENTE
AND
Please make the Caldari one a MISSILES based ship, if I'd wanted a turret, I had 3 other races to choose from!!!
 |

OdysseySpace
The First Foundation SOLAR FLEET
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 21:34:00 -
[369] - Quote
And so a lot of useless ships. It would be better space filler content. And then the solar system the size of the prisons of the camera. When they said something about the custom agents. They've forgotten. |

Major Eyeswater
Snake Eyes Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 21:48:00 -
[370] - Quote
IMHO, a Caldari Torp BC isn't going to be a mini Golem, so it will need painters, MWD and tackle gear maybe, not leaving many mid slots for drake-like tank, so I will look forward to seeing this ship in the flesh.
I feel these ships might prove useful in a sniping role- Amarr BC for sure, if it can cram 8 Tachy Beams on board.
Time will tell  |
|

Vlad McCain
The Black Pearl Emporium
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 00:19:00 -
[371] - Quote
idk those guns look a tad small for a minie ship... id have thought they'd try to cram 6 or 8 3500mm's on there |

tasman devil
Pangalactic Punks n' Playboys HUN Reloaded
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 00:39:00 -
[372] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:The Community team is committed to bringing you all the latest information on what we have in store for you in the coming winter expansion and beyond. Game design is putting the final touches on new ships...and here's the concept overview of the the first one. The ship everyone has been waiting for.... the Tornado. What an A grade piece of cr*p is this sh*t!?!?
We don't need more ships WE NEED BETTER MECHANICS, FFS!
Tier 4 is unneeded... what role would the fill? BS? Already taken! (by 3 tiers + tech 2 variants) BC? Already taken! (by 2 tiers + tech 2 variants) CR? Already taken! (by 4 tiers + tech 2 variants)
Give me a break and fly me to Reykjavik... |

Naomi Wildfire
Spricer Raiden.
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 01:09:00 -
[373] - Quote
Next ally tourney will field lots of Tier3 BCs i hope, would get damn interesting since it would be the biggest change since the introduction of T3 Cruisers
@poster above me
Quote:Tier 4 is unneeded... what role would the fill? BS? Already taken! (by 3 tiers + tech 2 variants) BC? Already taken! (by 2 tiers + tech 2 variants) CR? Already taken! (by 4 tiers + tech 2 variants)
at first, it is clearly Tier3
second: BS = Battleship BC = Battlecruiser CR = Combat Recon
Seriously get a clue before you start bitching about stuff you dont know. In addition you are missing faction/pirate versions. |

Falin Whalen
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
44
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 03:34:00 -
[374] - Quote
Cloora wrote:SidneyB wrote:Shaera Taam wrote:Maul555 wrote:Harotak wrote: Caught in a landslide.
No escape from reality Open your eyes Look up to the skies and see I'm just a poor boy. I need no sympathy
|

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 03:41:00 -
[375] - Quote
Ya this is just what we need lets make Battle Ships even more useless and unwanted out side of pve.
Edit: On the bright side I do look forward to new ships. |

Soldarius
Peek-A-Boo Bombers
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 04:49:00 -
[376] - Quote
BC hull w/BS wepaons. So we're talking faster velocity and agility, faster lock times, not so long on the locking range, but easily boostable. Decent tank. Hmm... snipers? Ambush troops? Should be very desirable for suicide ganks. They will definitely replace the welpcane.
Feeling very glad I have my torp skills nearly maxed. (Hoping its torps for Caldari.) "How do you kill that which has no life?" |

Den Sethos
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 05:58:00 -
[377] - Quote
I'm looking forward to this. It should give some variety to BCs and maybe, just maybe, allow people to clear L4 missions without a slow, clumsy battleship.
What's more, a third tier means we might get more Tech 2 BCs (look at the BSs: 3 tiers, the first 2 with T2 equivalents) |

Nydia Winters
Autocannons Anonymous
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 08:02:00 -
[378] - Quote
Seams like they should be their own class they sound like Pocket Battleships; an example would be the Admiral Graf Spee. |

s73v3n2k
UK Corp RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 09:34:00 -
[379] - Quote
Increased PG/CPU for large weapons will also allow for large buffer tanks to be fitted to them so certainly be interesting to see if they are used as intended or not.
Good to see CCP are actually back on track and adding things people actually want to see in the game.
More of the same please.
|

Scarlett Ninja
Section 5
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 09:42:00 -
[380] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical hehe RIP welpcane HELLOOOOOOOOOOO welpnado also it keeps in tune with wind based storms for the minmatar battlecruisers cyclone, hurricane, tornado, if ever a tier 4 one comes out what is left to name it with? Gale?
how about "Storm" |
|

Ahrman Vanaheim
Chimaera Combine Novus Dominatum
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 11:01:00 -
[381] - Quote
Really looking forward to the other 3 races new BC's, particularly Caldari and Gallente!
Lots of really great entries for all the ships, however this one would probably make an outstanding Amarr BC later:
http://browse.deviantart.com/contests/2010/eveonline/?qh=§ion=&q=king#/d2z65ee
Different enough to stand out from the current ships, yet a design that grows on me. Would love to see one of those, in that colour scheme flying  |

Destructor1792
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 11:06:00 -
[382] - Quote
I can see these ships being fast but paper thin... Get ready for many tears  |

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 12:49:00 -
[383] - Quote
If CCP gets the hybrid fix to work, then I can dream of a blaster-cannon BC.  |

Jill Antaris
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 12:58:00 -
[384] - Quote
Will wait for the stats, slot layouts and bonuses before judging. However I can't see this concept work outside minmatar ships, where a hull that does this already exist.
Oh and the gallente one should look like this: Aquilon , the Mentor was a very cool design for amarr even if it actually looked more like a drone carrier. |

Katabrok First
Apukaray Security
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 14:34:00 -
[385] - Quote
s73v3n2k wrote:Increased PG/CPU for large weapons will also allow for large buffer tanks to be fitted to them so certainly be interesting to see if they are used as intended or not.
Good to see CCP are actually back on track and adding things people actually want to see in the game.
More of the same please.
Probably it will use the same bonus as stealth bombers, a reduction in PG and CPU for the large guns, instead of higher value attributes... |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
82

|
Posted - 2011.10.23 15:12:00 -
[386] - Quote
Thank you for all your replies and feedback. The majority of the posts show excitement! Roughly a quarter of the posts I have read had a positive attitude but were a bit hesitant. I saw less than 5% of the posts that considered this idea as being really bad.
Most of the hesitation results from lack of solid numbers so far as you haven't seen the stats of the new ships or how exactly they will work. Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless? Won't the new battlecruiser have a too strong tank, making them overpowered? Won't the tier 2 battleships become useless? What about the Gallente ship, will it at least this time not get the short end? And how will tracking work, a fast ship with large weapons? We saw more questions and read them all!
CCP Ytterbium is working on a new Devblog with more information about the Tornado and its brothers in arms.
CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 15:23:00 -
[387] - Quote
Blimeh, a dev response after the first couple of pages, it's like the old days again 
I'm just curious what role these new BC's will fulfil.
The idea is awesome, but the idea behind titans and motherships (supercarriers) was also Awesome(TM) and look how that turned out.
EvE doesn't need awesome ideas when ships are added, it needs roles which ships are designed to fill otherwise you end up with the problems we've got now, ie supercarriers and to a similar extent, T3 Cruisers (jack of all trades, but oddly also extremely good at said trades, like the Tengu).
If this idea with the BC's using next size up weapons works out nicely, would CCP be willing to take the idea and apply it to Destroyers? They *really* could do with a lot of love and have needed it for many years now. |

Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 15:51:00 -
[388] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless?
Tier 1 BCs are already useless, as are most of the lower-tier cruisers and frigates. Personally, I'm worried CCP is reinforcing the tier concept with these ships, when you should be removing it. |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:04:00 -
[389] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote:CCP Phantom wrote:Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless? Tier 1 BCs are already useless, as are most of the lower-tier cruisers and frigates. Personally, I'm worried CCP is reinforcing the tier concept with these ships, when you should be removing it.
This.
I find it utterly annoying that CCP is the last one admitting the most evident thing. 2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is" 2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?" Nice progress, guys. |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
80
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:05:00 -
[390] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote:[quote=CCP Phantom]as are most of the lower-tier cruisers and frigates. Personally, I'm worried CCP is reinforcing the tier concept with these ships, when you should be removing it. well it's normal given they all have nice tech2 variant, et a noob will never have a reason to test those little things, given he will quickly have a better option. that's sad, but it would need a total revamp of all ships to make this better, and i don't think a good result is possible... |
|

Xeldrak
Khanid Spirits Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:14:00 -
[391] - Quote
One word: Awesome!
But now give us the amarr one that will crush this puny minmatar-construct 
gotta got - change my skillplan |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
153
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 16:19:00 -
[392] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:Ya this is just what we need lets make Battle Ships even more useless and unwanted out side of pve.  These ships from the EVEkill Top 20 think you are talking crazy.
3 Abaddon 52906 4 Armageddon 25130 5 Maelstrom 24284 6 Tempest 22567
But hey I am sure the 175kEHP Abbadon is very scared of a Ship with 25% the Tank that it can hit.
Really if anyone should be scared of these things it should be.
1 Drake 141384 2 Hurricane 85968
These guys which can get hit by those weapons and can not out run the New Battlecruiser. |

Jack Dant
The Gentlemen of Low Moral Fibre
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:33:00 -
[393] - Quote
Raid'En wrote:Jack Dant wrote:[quote=CCP Phantom]as are most of the lower-tier cruisers and frigates. Personally, I'm worried CCP is reinforcing the tier concept with these ships, when you should be removing it. well it's normal given they all have nice tech2 variant, et a noob will never have a reason to test those little things, given he will quickly have a better option. that's sad, but it would need a total revamp of all ships to make this better, and i don't think a good result is possible... It's not the T2 variants, it's the tiers: cyclone vs hurricane, prophecy vs harbinger, etc.
Tier 1 and 2 BCs have the same skill requirements (to fly effectively), and, once fit and rigged, have very similar costs. But the tier 1 BCs have less slots and fitting, so they are much weaker and generally only flown by noobs, or by people trying to look like noobs to get fights.
It would be so easy to give the tier 1 ships the extra slots and PG/CPU to become competitive, and recover 4 perfectly good ships. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
132
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 18:37:00 -
[394] - Quote
Buzzmong wrote:Blimeh, a dev response after the first couple of pages, it's like the old days again  I'm just curious what role these new BC's will fulfil. The idea is awesome, but the idea behind titans and motherships (supercarriers) was also Awesome(TM) and look how that turned out. EvE doesn't need awesome ideas when ships are added, it needs roles which ships are designed to fill otherwise you end up with the problems we've got now, ie supercarriers and to a similar extent, T3 Cruisers (jack of all trades, but oddly also extremely good at said trades, like the Tengu). If this idea with the BC's using next size up weapons works out nicely, would CCP be willing to take the idea and apply it to Destroyers? They *really* could do with a lot of love and have needed it for many years now.
depends all on the stats and slot layouts but i wouldn't be suprised it will be used as the historical battlecruiser we know ; seek out and destroy anything that isn't fast enough and smaller ( cruisers; other bc s , industrials ) but fast enough to escape anything larger and stronger
butwe need to wait for the stats to see what they will bring more to the game I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

inexistin
Rubbish and Garbage Removal Atlas.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 20:45:00 -
[395] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless?
One name: Ferox. And don't tell me about blasters; at least not until winter comes. |

Rawls Canardly
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:51:00 -
[396] - Quote
Looking forward to the change, but I'm of the camp that believes that destroyers need both a big buff (turns slower than a cruiser and tanks like a frigate? Come on.) And more options. this could be game changing nonetheless |

Ulair Memmet
ORIGIN SYSTEMS
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 21:52:00 -
[397] - Quote
The ship looks badass. I'm looking forward to the other ones 
How about sentry-boni for the gallente :) Not like the sin, i mean REAL damage and tracking. And a drone-scooping range bonus to make up for the immovability muahaha
Looking forward to the next blogs |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
80
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 22:29:00 -
[398] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote: It's not the T2 variants, it's the tiers: cyclone vs hurricane, prophecy vs harbinger, etc.
i was only quoting the CRUISER stuff, not the BC stuff. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 22:57:00 -
[399] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Thank you for all your replies and feedback. The majority of the posts show excitement! Roughly a quarter of the posts I have read (and I have read them all) had a positive attitude but were a bit hesitant. I saw less than 5% of the posts that considered this idea as being really bad.
Most of the hesitation results from lack of solid numbers so far as you haven't seen the stats of the new ships or how exactly they will work. Won't the tier 1 and 2 battlecruisers become useless? Won't the new battlecruiser have a too strong tank, making them overpowered? Won't the tier 2 battleships become useless? What about the Gallente ship, will it at least this time not get the short end? And how will tracking work, a fast ship with large weapons? We saw more questions and read them all!
CCP Ytterbium is working on a new Devblog with more information about the Tornado and its brothers in arms.
Some of us are maybe going fast for conclusions but heh, after all in what gallente pilots are concerned, it's not like if we're stuck with something close to useless because of the very specific roles our ships can field and represent a tiny portion of what Eve combat has to offer, I guess we play more often than those specific occasions happen.
Yes I'm really curious to see what you guys have cooked for hybrids and gallente pilots in hope we'll be happy and surprised. Between Caldari and Gallente you'd make a huge percentage of players happy I guess. |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:17:00 -
[400] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Rip Minner wrote:Ya this is just what we need lets make Battle Ships even more useless and unwanted out side of pve.  These ships from the EVEkill Top 20 think you are talking crazy. 3 Abaddon 52906 4 Armageddon 25130 5 Maelstrom 24284 6 Tempest 22567 But hey I am sure the 175kEHP Abbadon is very scared of a Ship with 25% the Tank that it can hit. Really if anyone should be scared of these things it should be. 1 Drake 141384 2 Hurricane 85968 These guys which can get hit by those weapons and can not out run the New Battlecruiser.
This numbers realy show nothing.
1.) Did they get poped in the attempt to do PVE? i.e. In a wormhole/in a sactum/in a Incursion/when rating?
2.) Did they get poped in a pvp engagment before they fig out sniping BS's get scan locked and pind down before they can go to warp again?
so on and so on.
Secondly I would realy like to know how you know the new BC's are only going to have 25% of the tank and cant out run a BS? |
|

Haulin Gneiss
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:36:00 -
[401] - Quote
can you say BC6? |

Haulin Gneiss
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.23 23:36:00 -
[402] - Quote
derp dupe |

Haulin Aussie
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 02:32:00 -
[403] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:To My Hurricane: Sorry, I've found something else. Something vertical
50million isk that Hurricanes will tear these things to shreds. |

bloodlust priest
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 03:02:00 -
[404] - Quote
so now there is really no reason to fly t2 ever again |

Fenris Nihilus
Southern Comfort Armaments Shadow of xXDEATHXx
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 05:17:00 -
[405] - Quote
bloodlust priest wrote:so now there is really no reason to fly t2 ever again They said it has over sized guns but sacrifices other assets like tankage.... so no still a reason to fly t2. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
623
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 05:26:00 -
[406] - Quote
To all the pro-battleship pilots who hate on caps, support the cap nerf and are not fond of a t3 BC that can push a BS's dps:
BS tears best tears. |

Poor Lazarus
Applied Creations The Fendahlian Collective
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:03:00 -
[407] - Quote
Behold! INTARNET SPACESHIPS ARE BACK! |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
167
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:11:00 -
[408] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote: This numbers realy show nothing.
1.) Did they get poped in the attempt to do PVE? i.e. In a wormhole/in a sactum/in a Incursion/when rating?
2.) Did they get poped in a pvp engagment before they fig out sniping BS's get scan locked and pind down before they can go to warp again?
so on and so on.
Sorry I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is because those 4 Battleships are the most well known Fleet Battlships in the game.
I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest are the fleet standard for PvP and are used heavily in large scale Warfare. which incidently is where they get such a high kill record compared to well everything else in the game below them.
Rip Minner wrote: Secondly I would realy like to know how you know the new BC's are only going to have 25% of the tank and cant out run a BS?
I do not for sure but your Avg Battlecruiser has 35-50k EHP. I do not see why these would be any different. I never said they could outrun a Battleship, sure I have no doubt they could run. If only running = winning. They have less tank and since most Battlecruisers currently have 6 Guns and smaller Drone bays it is a good bet that they will do less DPS if they can even fit the largest guns like those Battleships can.
I am willing to bet that the Abbadon, Maelstrom and Co are not going anywhere soon. |

Alex Logan
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:52:00 -
[409] - Quote
this sounds interesting, we can fit the big howitzers and insta pop noobs up in hisec... |

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
58
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 06:55:00 -
[410] - Quote
Ulair Memmet wrote:The ship looks badass. I'm looking forward to the other ones  How about sentry-boni for the gallente :) Not like the sin, i mean REAL damage and tracking. And a drone-scooping range bonus to make up for the immovability muahaha Looking forward to the next blogs
I want hybrid fixed and do some proper damage with large blasters, not another drone boat.
|
|

Vorpheus
Three Sword Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 09:07:00 -
[411] - Quote
i already thought about siege battlecruisers, nice thing... but what next? player controlled fighter bomber i would love... stealthbomber with capital weapons, weeee...
but back to topic... i just realized... another gankweapon... hm, that tornado would be overpowered, if it could have 8 1400mm artilleries... doubt thats gonna happen...
but anyway... winters gonna be epic |

Gods Coldblood
The Ankou Raiden.
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 09:28:00 -
[412] - Quote
Ok, well,
i had to check it wasn't April..
It isn't!!!!
I also took precautions and pinched myself,
it hurt, so I'm not dreaming..
So this isn't a joke?
err
hmmm
Ok
EVE PVP Video's : Channel |

charmed knight
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 10:57:00 -
[413] - Quote
so, Drakes with cruise launchers, again borring Fleet fights: 100 x Tier3Drakes + 30 logistics VS 100 x Tier3Drakes + 30 logistics :facepalm:
 |

Commander Grace
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 11:43:00 -
[414] - Quote
How about that dev blog?
need moar details... liek naow!! |

Jose Black
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:10:00 -
[415] - Quote
Suicide ganking buff anyone? |

Joshke
Epsilon Inc STORM.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:10:00 -
[416] - Quote
Everybody so excited about large guns ? What about your tank, think how long you can stay against a soloing Rapture (lol) or a 2x Thrashers, which pop you puppy in seconds. And how you large guns will be missing any smaller targets. |

TheButcherPete
StoneWall Metals Productions Rebel Alliance of New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 12:35:00 -
[417] - Quote
Xython wrote:Mekhana wrote:CCP please make the Gallente ship of this new BC line worth flying. We really need some love. Not emptyquoting, just bringing this back up. Please, for the love of pete, make the Gallente one not suck. Our standard BC is worse in literally every way to the Minmatar BC.
I'm Pete :D Hybrid/Drone beast Gallente ftw
Also Xython, I love you too. |

Knug LiDi
N00bFleeT Numquam Ambulare Solus
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 14:32:00 -
[418] - Quote
Traiori wrote:Long story short: All those C1 POS towers that we couldn't get battleships to are going down this winter...
guess getting t2 cruisers or t3 cruisers was too hard ?
If only we could fall into a woman's arms
without falling into her hands |

Kaaletram Lothyrawir
Ignus Astrum The Veyr Collective
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 14:35:00 -
[419] - Quote
Wow just what the Gallente need is another glass cannon  |

Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 15:21:00 -
[420] - Quote
This would be epic if ships like the Hurricane didn't already outdamage certain battleships while still tracking small ships without any trouble...
Pinky |
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
51
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 17:26:00 -
[421] - Quote
Kaaletram Lothyrawir wrote:Wow just what the Gallente need is another glass cannon 
Another FAIL glass canon you mean? -no thx, give another drone boat instead for all those afk youp_orn lovers, I'll keep training up minmatar for pvp and caldari for pve, since it opens new optiosn for pirate ships finally why do I even bother all assaults are plain ****, or cruisers terribad, bs's pure crap? I can fly the most overpowered ships in the game, shouldn't even bother with this gallente "Tiers 3 BC" and what he's capable of (not being close to what another race can offer)
Devblog? = Words I want actions not words, already tired of those.
|

Lucjan
R-E-D
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 17:54:00 -
[422] - Quote
T2 Myrmidon finally yes? |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 18:23:00 -
[423] - Quote
Well, I'm happy that CCP is adding some "NEW" and "USABLE" Ships, its been years.
TBH, most of the different ship configurations are already ingame and I'm glad something else "UNIQUE" is being added.
I'm sure that once they are here, someone will find the perfect use and fit for them.
Always good to have more "CHOICE"!
@ All the "HATERS", give them a chance, we don't even know the slots or bonus's yet! 
Well, thats my 5 ISKs worth, all I need now is a date for the winter expansion!
THX CCP!!!!!
 |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 18:33:00 -
[424] - Quote
I guess somebody at CCP finally got around to actually looking up the word "Battlecruiser". Now all they need to do is re-classify the old style BC's as "Heavy Cruisers" and we will have some sense.
As for the new ships - I don't know if I like the idea or not. BS sized weapons is fine, but I hope to see them with limited tanking capability (T1 BC levels at best), a decent turn of speed (but slower than a Cruiser or HAC) and poor agility due to their size.
Ultimately, I don't know what niche they are expected to fulfill. LR sniper maybe, but there are HAC's and BS that already do that, and do it with more versatility and survivability (I expect). L4 mission runner? Not unless they have a much bigger tank than I expect them to have.
Most of the roles that BC's had in the real world just don't translate into EVE, so that just leaves commerce raiding. If CCP are giving us a new ship that is only really good as a cheap disposable High Sec ganking tool I am going to be pi**ed.
Like it or not the majority of EVE players live in High Sec, and making life more difficult for them is not going to persuade them to move to Low or Null. The perception that I have of Low and Null is that it suits just two types of players - The no lifers who are able to spend 8 hours a day or more in-game, and pvp'ers who are happy to log on and spend an hour or two looking for randoms to kill. People who have limited time, and want to build stuff, or trade stuff, or explore stuff will generally end up doing it in High Sec because it is casual friendly. Making it less casual friendly will just cause them to stop logging on, and ultimately to stop paying their subs.
I fear that now that CCP have promised to concentrate on "Ships in Space", and promised us new ships, they have scrambled around to find something they can deliver quickly rather than put in the work to deliver us the stuff like T3 frigates that they have been talking about for so long. I would rather they took the time to do it right, rather than do it quick, and I hope they have been very carefull when planning the roles and uses these new hulls can be put to once the many many ingenious and devious Bas*ards in this game get their hands on them. |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 19:25:00 -
[425] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote:I guess somebody at CCP finally got around to actually looking up the word "Battlecruiser". Now all they need to do is re-classify the old style BC's as "Heavy Cruisers" and we will have some sense.
As for the new ships - I don't know if I like the idea or not. BS sized weapons is fine, but I hope to see them with limited tanking capability (T1 BC levels at best), a decent turn of speed (but slower than a Cruiser or HAC) and poor agility due to their size.
Ultimately, I don't know what niche they are expected to fulfill. LR sniper maybe, but there are HAC's and BS that already do that, and do it with more versatility and survivability (I expect). L4 mission runner? Not unless they have a much bigger tank than I expect them to have.
Most of the roles that BC's had in the real world just don't translate into EVE, so that just leaves commerce raiding. If CCP are giving us a new ship that is only really good as a cheap disposable High Sec ganking tool I am going to be pi**ed.
Like it or not the majority of EVE players live in High Sec, and making life more difficult for them is not going to persuade them to move to Low or Null. The perception that I have of Low and Null is that it suits just two types of players - The no lifers who are able to spend 8 hours a day or more in-game, and pvp'ers who are happy to log on and spend an hour or two looking for randoms to kill. People who have limited time, and want to build stuff, or trade stuff, or explore stuff will generally end up doing it in High Sec because it is casual friendly. Making it less casual friendly will just cause them to stop logging on, and ultimately to stop paying their subs.
I fear that now that CCP have promised to concentrate on "Ships in Space", and promised us new ships, they have scrambled around to find something they can deliver quickly rather than put in the work to deliver us the stuff like T3 frigates that they have been talking about for so long. I would rather they took the time to do it right, rather than do it quick, and I hope they have been very carefull when planning the roles and uses these new hulls can be put to once the many many ingenious and devious Bas*ards in this game get their hands on them.
Amazing! Most of your post is based on an assumption of ships that we don't even know the layout of!
Another CCP Conspiracy to get us all into Low/Null Sec!!!! Whatever!!!! 
|

Sai Phone'kopai
Resurrection Ventures Un.Bound
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 19:29:00 -
[426] - Quote
Actually there's a very straight-forward solution to all this new-ship & re-balance discussion (in my opinion) ...
Tier-1 = all purpose with some variation across hulls, i.e. light cruiser with low-end medium weapons and heavy cruiser with high-end weapons
Tier-2 = specialized roles, i.e. only 2 of 5 hulls can do EW (using stealth bomber pattern - it just won't fit that hull) and only a different 2 or 5 can do recon, etc.
Tier-3 = hunter/killer - tornado is an example
Tech-2 = a BIG increase in capability (same pattern as Tech-1) with a corresponding big increase in cost and training
Tech-3 = ditto with a HUGH increase in capability, cost, and training (making them even rarer) - you want to fly that Tengu, train 6 months for it - of course it can be countered with a big enough group of Tech-1 & Tech-2 Tier-3 ships
difficult to implement you say? not really if you're going to be radical - employ the training points schema already used - everyone looses all combat training skills in all ship but gains a massive amount of immediate affect training points
net result = all hulls meaningfully re-balanced and all pilots able to train specifically desired skills while making 'exotic' ships really rare and expensive - that's how you break the current null/low/gank vs high/mission patterns - that's how you make ROLE PLAYING ships in space |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 20:01:00 -
[427] - Quote
Phantomania wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote:Stuff... Amazing! Most of your post is based on an assumption of ships that we don't even know the layout of! Another CCP Conspiracy to get us all into Low/Null Sec!!!! Whatever!!!! 
Hey, who knew? When I kept saying stuff like "I expect..." I was actually making "assumptions". Wow, my vocabulary just got bigger.
Of course I was making assumptions, and I was being pretty clear what they were too (or so I thought). I thought this thread was where we could come to speculate on what sort of capabilities these new ships might have - my mistake. I didn't realise that we were supposed to stfu and sit quietly untill CCP decided to spoon feed us a few more details.
Oh, and fyi for there to be a "Conspiracy" (your cap) there has to be some secrecy - CCP have clearly stated that they want to move players out of High and into Low and Null. |

Tashanaka
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 21:04:00 -
[428] - Quote
Jill Antaris wrote:Will wait for the stats, slot layouts and bonuses before judging. However I can't see this concept work outside minmatar ships, where a hull that does this already exist. Oh and the gallente one should look like this: Aquilon , the Mentor was a very cool design for amarr even if it actually looked more like a drone carrier.
I loved the look of the Aquilon too, I hope they do use it for the Gallente version. Hopefully the Hybrid & Blaster fix will bring the Brutix model hulls out of retirement,
|

Dray
Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 22:02:00 -
[429] - Quote
Charles37 wrote:Will this be a Tech 2 BC (i.e. require BC V)? Any other skill prereqs that we will need to train as well? Or is this information being saved for another dev blog?
"Tier 3" so probably racial cruiser 3/4 and battle cruiser 3.
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
102
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 22:09:00 -
[430] - Quote
Today's forecast has MOTHERFUCKING TORNADOES! \o/ 10/19 2011 - never forget the 20%
|
|

Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 22:39:00 -
[431] - Quote
I have to admit... I began to salivate the moment I read the headline. New BCs! BCs with BS guns! A clip from a beloved Movie in reference to the new ships badassness! The pool of drool had made my chair look like a wet-dream accident by the time I finished reading. Awesome CCP!!! \o/ eëĆWhomever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my AutocannonseëĆ eÉŕ |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. The Lostboys
99
|
Posted - 2011.10.24 23:05:00 -
[432] - Quote
Maybe the Gallente one will still be medium guns, but have a Dominix sized drone bay. Five sentries or five heavies from a BC. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. Subscribers can never answer a question posed to CCP. Only CCP can. |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 04:10:00 -
[433] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Rip Minner wrote: This numbers realy show nothing.
1.) Did they get poped in the attempt to do PVE? i.e. In a wormhole/in a sactum/in a Incursion/when rating?
2.) Did they get poped in a pvp engagment before they fig out sniping BS's get scan locked and pind down before they can go to warp again?
so on and so on.
Sorry I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is because those 4 Battleships are the most well known Fleet Battlships in the game. I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest are the fleet standard for PvP and are used heavily in large scale Warfare. which incidently is where they get such a high kill record compared to well everything else in the game below them. Rip Minner wrote: Secondly I would realy like to know how you know the new BC's are only going to have 25% of the tank and cant out run a BS?
I do not for sure but your Avg Battlecruiser has 35-50k EHP. I do not see why these would be any different. I never said they could outrun a Battleship, sure I have no doubt they could run. If only running = winning. They have less tank and since most Battlecruisers currently have 6 Guns and smaller Drone bays it is a good bet that they will do less DPS if they can even fit the largest guns like those Battleships can. I am willing to bet that the Abbadon, Maelstrom and Co are not going anywhere soon.
Then I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is becouse those 4 Battleships fit 1400 Arty and Tach Beams but will probly end up costing twice as much as the new Tier 3 BC with 1400 Arty and Tach Beams there for replacing thoughs BS at there last good role in pvp.
Then go back and read my first post again?
I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest will be replaced as the fleet standard in PVP when you can field 2 times as many Teir 3 BC with the same amount of isk and when your geting Alphed by the other side too the size of your EHP being 25% less realy do's not matter becouse when your geting Alphed is insta pop time for any sub cap ship. |

Nagashiera Prime
Planet Espresso
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 04:21:00 -
[434] - Quote
Nice job, CCP. The ship looks great, even if it is an upside-down-and-backwards Myrmidon. I'll reserve any negative remarks until after reviewing stats. My initial reaction was fear that this would further alienate small corporations from lowsec as gangs of alpha Tornadoes camp the gates, but I think it's time to put some fear into the Drake pilots. As many times as I've been frustrated that someone was able to burn back to the gate and jump, I think it's time to make burn-back less of an option in low and in null. Personally, I'd rather see bigger tanks and longer session timers to force some longer brawls, but this is a step in the right direction.
Reiterating what others have said, I would like to see the following: 1) No drone bays. 2) No tracking bonuses.
To encourage fleet diversity and composition, these ships should not be able to hit smaller targets very well. I do like the idea that these will function almost like mini-dreadnoughts in that they will be able to siege C1 WH POS structures and capital ships with greater DPS than their hull would traditionally allow.
To further diversify roles, I would like to suggest for debate the idea of disallowing this class of ships from fitting any sort of E-WAR (including propulsion jamming) so that their role is clearly defined and fleet commanders will actually start using ships that get bonuses for these roles. |

Alara IonStorm
Caldari State
180
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 05:35:00 -
[435] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:
Then I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is becouse those 4 Battleships fit 1400 Arty and Tach Beams but will probly end up costing twice as much as the new Tier 3 BC with 1400 Arty and Tach Beams there for replacing thoughs BS at there last good role in pvp.
Bolded is wrong, Mega Pulse and 1400mm majority for Abbadons. Fleets rarely use Tachs since Apocraphya.
Rip Minner wrote: I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest will be replaced as the fleet standard in PVP when you can field 2 times as many Teir 3 BC with the same amount of isk and when your geting Alphed by the other side too the size of your EHP being 25% less realy do's not matter becouse when your geting Alphed is insta pop time for any sub cap ship.
Bolded again, Drakes have 50% less then an Abbadon on a good day and I doubt they will have a Drake Tank. As for you can field, you very well can not field twice as many, you can field as many as can show up and Battleships are not that expensive.
You are under the mistaken impression of how easy it is to Alpha something with a ton of HP. A Hellcat Gang will chew through 3 Tornado's before there 1400mm Cycle is over and done with. That Tornado Gang would be gone in short order. That is if they can even fit Guns that big which remains to be seen.
Battleships are not Dying. Just like they were Dying because of HAC's, just like they were dying because of Bombs, just like they were dying because of Supercarriers and just like they were dying because of Drakes they are all still here. Turns out all those Deaths were "Forum Deaths". Once Tornado's lose enough Dmg for an Alpha, a feet that would take 30-50 Tornado's (Unless you go by EFT) with the same Dmg as a Maelstrom they will be slaughtered. Because say what you want 40 Mega Pulse Abbadons shooting at one Tornado with 30-50k HP with low EM Resists is going to die way before they can Alpha another Abbadon.
Battleships are only Dying on the forums. |

Sessym
Superstructure Exposure Service
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 06:23:00 -
[436] - Quote
Training Battlecruisers to 5 now [:D] _________ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;;####;;-------======-]> --,,,,,,,,,.... //_###_________------;;;;;;;;;;;;'''----======-]> --'''''"""" //_____/ ------- |

Itar Sheep
The Black Sheep Inc
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 06:31:00 -
[437] - Quote
Great, more high alpha gangs  |

AspiB'elt
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 07:00:00 -
[438] - Quote
PLS CCP,
You need also to found some solution to modify something with racial bonus and ship.
Now the situation is :
Minmatar : Are the speed, don't use capa to fire and have also the web, have also the agility, best tracking for the gun, Can make damage in all resistance, have bonus on the tracking in the medium range ammo.
Gallente : Hybrid (no comment), use some capa when they fire, a good drone (but travel time). Damage Kinetic / Thermal.
Caldari : Missile and hybrid, dps on all resistance with missile
Amarr : the slower, Use a lot of capa, have the worst tracking, Damage only EM and thermal, Have some missile ship but with short range and you don't have speed ...
No they are to much avantage to fly minmatar, increase the range of the hybrid is good but not enough.
A lot of minmatar ship have some bonus for the tracking already. Decrease the tracking of the autocanon.
Now about battlecruiser :
Cyclone : 5% bonus medium projectif turret rate of fire , 7.5 % bonus shield boosting Hurricane : 5% bonus medium projectif turret rate of fire and damage
Prophecy : 10% reduction in energy weapons capacitor, 5% all resistance Harbinger : 10% reduction in energy weapons capacitor, 5% laser bonus damage
Now you have the strange situation with the amarr with the ew weapon neutralizer is more usefull tu put them on the minmatar ship against the amarr...
In the both case the amarr have some bonus to be able to fire ( 10% for capa). this is not a bonus, i hope it's normaly to be use your weapon when you use a ship.
You make a like more DPS, but less alpha then minmatar with more problem with no real 2 second bonus on the ship. It's the same problem for hybrid, but the hybrid have the second bonus.
PLS CCP decrease the capacity to need to fire with laser and hybrid. And also had some real bonus on this two ship. Exemple :
Prophecy : 5% tracking , 5% all resistance Harbinger : 5% bonus on optimal and falloff, 5% laser bonus damage
Normaly in the roleplay. the amarr have the most evoluate weapons ... Ok but where is weapons are evoluate CCP.
It's the weapon use more Capacity, It's a weapon have the worst tracking, Make medium DPS and medium Alpha. About range ... Now the falloff is more important than optimal. |

bard wilks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 09:30:00 -
[439] - Quote
About now..
..is a good time for the blog about the details..
pretty plx |

Tepir
BALKAN EXPRESS Nulli Secunda
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 11:36:00 -
[440] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Rip Minner wrote:
Then I figured any EVE Player who would have a comment on this would understand that the reason they are in the top six is becouse those 4 Battleships fit 1400 Arty and Tach Beams but will probly end up costing twice as much as the new Tier 3 BC with 1400 Arty and Tach Beams there for replacing thoughs BS at there last good role in pvp.
Bolded is wrong, Mega Pulse and 1400mm majority for Abbadons. Fleets rarely use Tachs since Apocrypha. Rip Minner wrote: I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest will be replaced as the fleet standard in PVP when you can field 2 times as many Teir 3 BC with the same amount of isk and when your geting Alphed by the other side too the size of your EHP being 25% less realy do's not matter becouse when your geting Alphed is insta pop time for any sub cap ship.
Bolded again, Drakes have 50% less then an Abbadon on a good day and I doubt they will have a Drake Tank. As for you can field, you very well can not field twice as many, you can field as many as can show up and Battleships are not that expensive. You are under the mistaken impression of how easy it is to Alpha something with a ton of HP. A Hellcat Gang will chew through 3 Tornado's before there 1400mm Cycle is over and done with. That Tornado Gang would be gone in short order. That is if they can even fit Guns that big which remains to be seen. Battleships are not Dying. Just like they were Dying because of HAC's, just like they were dying because of Bombs, just like they were dying because of Supercarriers and just like they were dying because of Drakes they are all still here. Turns out all those Deaths were "Forum Deaths". Once Tornado's lose enough Dmg for an Alpha, a feet that would take 30-50 Tornado's (Unless you go by EFT) with the same Dmg as a Maelstrom they will be slaughtered. Because say what you want 40 Mega Pulse Abbadons shooting at one Tornado with 30-50k HP with low EM Resists is going to die way before they can Alpha another Abbadon. Battleships are only Dying on the forums.
+1
in first two weeks my eve life, when my first dream was to fly abaddon as amarr pilot , all i heard was: dont train for that crap, they are dead... train minmatar hacs, zealots etc.... 2 years later... i didnt regret my first big skill was amarr BS lvl 5 , you see them more than bc's, you see them more than cruisers..... Abaddons, geddons and navy geddons are everywhere.... i wonder why ? 2 years ago forums told they are dead.... 2 years later forum still saying same thing... |
|

Shadowsword
The Rough Riders Ares Protectiva
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 11:38:00 -
[441] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest will be replaced as the fleet standard in PVP when you can field 2 times as many Teir 3 BC with the same amount of isk and when your geting Alphed by the other side too the size of your EHP being 25% less realy do's not matter becouse when your geting Alphed is insta pop time for any sub cap ship.
And you can double your number of pilots in fleet by pulling them out of your hat?
Number of pilots in fleet is a finite ressource, even more than isk. If your fleet can field 100 tier3 BC to replace 50 BS, then your fleet can also field 100 BS. |

Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 12:38:00 -
[442] - Quote
I hope CCP's further blog comes out soon, the speculation that they'll be running around with a full rack of top tier large guns isn't constructive to the dicussion of their roles. |

Neo Agricola
Anti Boon Fraktion
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 12:45:00 -
[443] - Quote
fake or real? Stats on Sisi for Tier 3 BC:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/lo9it/tornado_oracle_naga_and_talos_tier_3_bcs_stats/ |

bard wilks
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 12:49:00 -
[444] - Quote
Efraya wrote:OracleBattlecruiser Skill Bonus: 7.5% bonus to Large Energy Turret tracking speed and 7.5% bonus to Large Energy Turret optimal range per level. 95% reduction in the powergrid need of Large Energy Turrets 50% reduction in the CPU need of Large Energy Turrets 50% reduction in the capacitor need of Large Energy Turrets NagaBattlecruiser Skill Bonus: 10% bonus to Torpedo Velocity, 5% bonus to Torpedo explosion velocity, 10% bonus to Large Hybrid Turret optimal range and 7.5% bonus to Large Hybrid Turret tracking speed per level. 95% reduction in the powergrid need of Large Hybrid Turrets 50% reduction in the CPU need of Large Hybrid Turrets 50% reduction in the capacitor need of Large Energy Turrets 40% reduction in the powergrid need of Siege Missile Launchers 58% reduction in the CPU need of Siege Missile Launchers TalosBattlecruiser Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Large Hybrid Turret damage and 10% bonus to the velocity factor of stasis webifiers per level. 95% reduction in the powergrid need of Large Hybrid Turrets 50% reduction in the CPU need of Large Hybrid Turrets 50% reduction in the capacitor need of Large Energy Turrets TornadoBattlecruiser Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Large Projectile Turret Rate of Fire and 10% bonus to Large Projectile Turret falloff per level. 95% reduction in the powergrid need of Large Projectile Turrets 50% reduction in the CPU need of Large Projectile Turrets Source: Test client cache Pea Roast from: http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/lo9it/tornado_oracle_naga_and_talos_tier_3_bcs_stats/
|

Ensnry
Expeditionary Fleet 2
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 12:52:00 -
[445] - Quote
DO WANT  |

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 13:01:00 -
[446] - Quote
If this is real CCP officialy killed BC, CS and BS within one Update. |

Neo Agricola
Anti Boon Fraktion
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 13:10:00 -
[447] - Quote
Damien White wrote:If this is real CCP officialy killed all old BC, CS and BS within one Update.
Fixed for you.
but look on the bright side:
You know exactly what your foes will field. ^^
|

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 13:13:00 -
[448] - Quote
touch+¬ |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
435
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 13:46:00 -
[449] - Quote
Damien White wrote:If this is real CCP officialy killed BC, CS and BS within one Update.
No tanks on 'em. You won't want to take one to a pos bash for example. You won't be using them to run Sleeper sites, or the empire equivalents. They won't survive Incursions. Their roles will be limited, they won't replace all these. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 14:16:00 -
[450] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Damien White wrote:If this is real CCP officialy killed BC, CS and BS within one Update. No tanks on 'em. You won't want to take one to a pos bash for example. You won't be using them to run Sleeper sites, or the empire equivalents. They won't survive Incursions. Their roles will be limited, they won't replace all these.
Well, we basicaly get a cheap Nightmare with Optimal Bonus, a fast Vindicator and a Machariel for free. Remember, these are T1 Ships, they get full payout from insurance.
Who the hell needs a Tank on these? Are you complaining about Cruiser with less than 30k HP?
And btw, fragile ships vs Frigs? Thank god we got a +10% to Velocity Factor of Stasis Webbifier per Level so even a Dramiel is dead meat.
One more thing, look at the PG difference between AC and Artillery or Pulse and Beam Laser. If these Ships carry at least 6 Turrets you get more than 500 free PG if you fit AC / Pulselaser, so you are able to use 1600 rolled Tungsten while having 95km Falloff or 75km Optimal. (with 2 tracking Enhancer/Computer) I wouldnt call this "no Tank". |
|

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
115
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 14:40:00 -
[451] - Quote
Assuming the stats are real I think they will have a very limited role and won't replace much if anything at all. I like the names. Since that information was pulled from the test server cache I would assume it is correct. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |

SwissChris1
Battlestars S E D I T I O N
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 14:55:00 -
[452] - Quote
If you can use Large Projectiles why wouldn't you just fly a nano Tempest?  |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:07:00 -
[453] - Quote
Interesting. No drones, no launchers (except for Naga. Which has 8 turret and 8 launcher slots)
With a tornado, you'd need to get a 30% boost to PG, to be able to fit 8 1400's. with nothing else. |

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:07:00 -
[454] - Quote
- fast - small signature - cheap - more damage - more range - requires less SP - more scan resolution
Why do you want to use a Tempest? |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:13:00 -
[455] - Quote
Because I don't get chewed to death by frigates I can't hit, and have no defences against?
With a couple of launchers and some drones on a Pest, you can take out Frigs. the Nado won't. |

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:22:00 -
[456] - Quote
This might be a problem, but as soon as you get 1 or 2 support ships there will be no tomorrow for your target. Tornado + Talos one and you have enough web for everything, especialy since the Talos can fit 2 Webbifier.
Just for Comparison, I tried to rebuild the tornado:
Quote:[Maelstrom, New Setup 1] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II [empty low slot]
100MN MicroWarpdrive II Warp Disruptor II Large Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Invulnerability Field II [empty med slot]
800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma L
Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I Large Core Defence Field Extender I
If you look at the link some posts before you will notice the 2600 base Shield HP for the Tornado, this will result in 40k eff HP and more, while deploying 900 DPS with 50km Falloff, more Speed and agility than a hurricane while having a smaller Signature.
This does look kinda broken, dont you think? |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:23:00 -
[457] - Quote
Jenn Makanen wrote:Because I don't get chewed to death by frigates I can't hit, and have no defences against?
With a couple of launchers and some drones on a Pest, you can take out Frigs. the Nado won't.
Well this is true but you should have other fleet with you no one ship should kill them all. I.E. look at the hammer comeing down on Caps just now.
I can see this ships doing well with right fleet make up. They mite do better in small gang warfar though and then again they mite just do well every were.
|

Damien White
Sonnenlegion Smacked Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:39:00 -
[458] - Quote
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/296974_10150362915094394_17614129393_7854984_623570200_n.jpg
Wich one is this? Gallente or Caldari? |

SwissChris1
Battlestars S E D I T I O N
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 15:51:00 -
[459] - Quote
Jenn Makanen wrote:Because I don't get chewed to death by frigates I can't hit, and have no defences against?
With a couple of launchers and some drones on a Pest, you can take out Frigs. the Nado won't.
This :)
...and don't forget about the two heavy neuts |

Gods Coldblood
The Ankou Raiden.
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 16:22:00 -
[460] - Quote
I dunno about you guys but faction battlecruisers sounds pretty sweet to me, if only.. My EVE PVP Video's :[url]http://www.youtube.com/user/GodsColdblood1[/url] |
|

Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:28:00 -
[461] - Quote
Damien White wrote:How about this?
Holymoly, have you scanned it for the other changes?
Hybrid boost is rather awesome:
All are getting a 30% reduction in cap use and a small drop in CPU (5%). Lots are getting a reduction in PG needs. Med and large rails seem to be getting 12% reduction along with all the blasters. Rails are getting a 10% damage boost across the board. Blasters seem to be getting a 20% tracking boost for all but the capital versions.
Other notable changes:
Gallente seem to be getting a general 10m/s speed boost alongside a 5% agility buff across the board.
Destroyers are losing the ROF penalty, gaining HP and gaining a smaller sig.
There's a Dram nerf in there as well alongside the Oneiros boost CCP Tallest has said he's adding.
Looks like there's also T2 mods being added of a number of flavours, as well as changes to the info/warfare links. |
|

CCP Konflikt
CCP Engineering Corp CCP Engineering Alliance
14

|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:32:00 -
[462] - Quote
Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ. |
|

Ryunosuke Kusanagi
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:47:00 -
[463] - Quote
it is still a good start though :) |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:52:00 -
[464] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ.
Aren't you supposed to make a blog before they hit SiSi? Sounds suspicious. 2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is" 2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?" Nice progress, guys. |

Abramul
StarFleet Enterprises BricK sQuAD.
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:53:00 -
[465] - Quote
I was rather hoping we'd see e-war battleships to match the Scorpion (and another combat battleship for Caldari), but this concept looks pretty cool too. |

Realyst
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 17:59:00 -
[466] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ. It would be nice to see it on SiSi before TQ to make some tests and make it more balanced. |

Kalmanaka
Cockpit Commandos
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 18:09:00 -
[467] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Aren't you supposed to make a blog before they hit SiSi? Sounds suspicious.
It's only suspicious if you're suffering from the paranoia side effect of smoking too much dope. |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 18:20:00 -
[468] - Quote
Kalmanaka wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Aren't you supposed to make a blog before they hit SiSi? Sounds suspicious. It's only suspicious if you're suffering from the paranoia side effect of smoking too much dope. Let me guess - you think current tier2 BC aren't already overpowered? 2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is" 2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?" Nice progress, guys. |

Kalmanaka
Cockpit Commandos
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 21:29:00 -
[469] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Kalmanaka wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Aren't you supposed to make a blog before they hit SiSi? Sounds suspicious. It's only suspicious if you're suffering from the paranoia side effect of smoking too much dope. Let me guess - you think current tier2 BC aren't already overpowered?
You apparently didn't see the shield/armor stats. The base tank of these new bc's is about halfway between a cruiser and the tier 1 bc. They fill an entirely different role than the current BC's and must be flown in an entirely different way, so not sure why it matters if the current BC's are overpowered or not. |

Neo Agricola
Anti Boon Fraktion
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 21:49:00 -
[470] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ. I was just joking around, that CCP "accidently" released those stats, so they can get a feedback from the comunity bevor they hit Sisi. This would enable them to see what the "actual" players would thing about those ships and what they make out of it...
As much as I like the current stats of those ships (they are fast, small and have a lot of DPS), for the sake of EVE I hope you balance them right, so they are not to much "imba". (you can make an exeption for the Gallente one, they need a lot of love)
:-)
Best regards. Neo. PS: Thank you for your replay, it shows us, that you acutally read what we write and don't stop reading at page 10.
|
|

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 04:42:00 -
[471] - Quote
Gods Coldblood wrote:I dunno about you guys but faction battlecruisers sounds pretty sweet to me, if only..
This is what I was thinking myself too. Why always jump to well lets just give Battle Ship Weapons to smaller faster ships when you can add in Faction Battlecruisers. |

CybrKnyf
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 04:53:00 -
[472] - Quote
I think a solution to the reduction of PVP and Manufacturing would be to require ALL cloaks to use Stront as fuel... Calculating the average cloak-time ability by adjusting stront usage per minute cloaked so that you could stay cloaked for only about an hour before running out of stront. An hour gives a cloaky ship plenty of time to actually DO something (scout, recon, cyno, make bookmarks, etc.) but doesn't fully stop a corp or alliance from making isk or require a miner or ratter to have a support fleet present at all times.
Think about it - This would increase PVP engagements as well as give the miners a little breathing room so that a red couldn't come into your system and just cloak-up and go AFK for days on end. This type of 'hostile action' only slows production of ships as well as burdening players who may be relatively new to nullsec operations. If you want to engage in tactics that reduce the isk income of a corp or alliance, there are better and more effective ways - namely those that lead to more ships needing to be built and more PVP.
If this game is to be about PVP and the struggle to succeed, then go for it...i'm all for it. I enjoy both winning and losing at PVP and that is the primary attraction to this game. Nobody I know that plays the game really enjoys it when you have a cloaked red in your systems for extended periods. Isn't this game supposed to be about having fun while playing? I know a load of you will call this whining, but the truth is that it only frustrates players and slows the burn of the economy. |

Darod Zyree
Zyree Holding
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 06:16:00 -
[473] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ.
What ever, deploy the changes, let chaos happen, and take my money as I re-sub all my accounts :D |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 07:13:00 -
[474] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:CCP Konflikt wrote:Just going to chime in here, these stats are a 1st pass taken from a chaos build, it hasn't been balanced in any sense and it's going to change before they go out to TQ.
There will be a dev-blog with final stats before they hit TQ. Aren't you supposed to make a blog before they hit SiSi? Sounds suspicious.
This is what I thought too. How are we supposed to test the changes and provide meaningful feedback if we don't know what we are testing?
As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking? |

Neo Agricola
Anti Boon Fraktion
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 07:21:00 -
[475] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote: As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking?
Pos Bashing TCU Bashing Killing Supers Killing Carriers a.s.o....
btw: low speed and agility? Hurricane: 165 / Tornado 225.0 (current stat)
|

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 07:33:00 -
[476] - Quote
Neo Agricola wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote: As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking?
Pos Bashing TCU Bashing Killing Supers Killing Carriers a.s.o.... btw: low speed and agility? Hurricane: 165 / Tornado 225.0 (current stat)
I think current BS do all of those things as well or better, and provide much better survivability and utility when the **** hits the fan.
Personally, I am training for Destroyers V, not BC V, and stocking up on Thrashers. |

Neo Agricola
Anti Boon Fraktion
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 07:43:00 -
[477] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote:Neo Agricola wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote: As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking?
Pos Bashing TCU Bashing Killing Supers Killing Carriers a.s.o.... btw: low speed and agility? Hurricane: 165 / Tornado 225.0 (current stat) I think current BS do all of those things as well or better, and provide much better survivability and utility when the **** hits the fan. Personally, I am training for Destroyers V, not BC V, and stocking up on Thrashers.
They are desinged for a "Hit and run" concept. so when the **** hits the fan, you should be long gone.
but lets discuss that, when we know the real stats. and again 5 month after that. than we will see, if they are used for anything else apart from High sec ganging. (BTW: WTS Tengu T2 fitted. when those BC hit Trianquiliti those High sec gankers will kill Tengus just for the LOLs)
|

Kmelx
Applied Creations The Fendahlian Collective
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 08:11:00 -
[478] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:CCP Konflikt wrote:stuff. Jesus, CCP Kornflake using monocles !! Go get em !
That's some pro trolling of the community  |

Nahnil
Zawa's Fan Club
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 09:11:00 -
[479] - Quote
Kalmanaka wrote:The base tank of these new bc's is about halfway between a cruiser and the tier 1 bc. They fill an entirely different role than the current BC's and must be flown in an entirely different way,
They will be used to kite, a groundbreaking new concept unheared of with current bcs. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 13:11:00 -
[480] - Quote
Kmelx wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:CCP Konflikt wrote:stuff. Jesus, CCP Kornflake using monocles !! Go get em ! That's some pro trolling of the community 
First troll best troll  Someone needed to initiate him to this wordefull game "Forums On Line" |
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 13:17:00 -
[481] - Quote
Neo Agricola wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote: As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking?
Pos Bashing TCU Bashing Killing Supers Killing Carriers a.s.o.... btw: low speed and agility? Hurricane: 165 / Tornado 225.0 (current stat)
The pro of station/gate hugging is still the gallente version, web bonus is an excellent improvement for gallente pilots who can find in fleets some serious job to do now -like protect the 60/80km +short range fellah's
Doesn't change the paper thin tank proper to those hulls and the armor speed drawbacks cumulated to such short range of blasters, stil slight improvement.
|

Kern Walzky
x13 Raiden.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 13:17:00 -
[482] - Quote
cant see the need for this Wannabe BC.
Why dont you just fix this broken game. Fix POS and Sovreignity etc. all this new **** we dont need...
BS wannabe BC. omg.. really?!?  |

Digital Gaidin
Manetheren Rising
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 15:28:00 -
[483] - Quote
What the hell is with all this bitching?
These ships look awesome, and there are many of us who are excited to see what the remaining 3 are going to look like. These ships are likely going to pack *near* BS firepower, be *near* their price, but be flimsier and faster. I've been around long enough to know that whatever CCP releases causes some to irrevicably feel the need to whine, *****, and moan... but seriously? This type of stuff is great, and if you can't get excited about this then what?
Calling it now, these ships end up with either Marauder style double weapon bonuses and 3 turrets, or normal 6 turret setups. Minmatar will probably be a split weapon system. Caldari is a toss up between another gun platform or a missile platform, though a high end Railgun platform with the new changes might be interesting (a pocket Rohk maybe?). At least one will probably be min/maxed to have some crazy tank and at least 2 of them will likely be generally ignored by the masses due to inherent weaknesses in the tank. Odds are, they will relatively invalidate current Tier 2 BC's for all but throw-away setups, but not stand up to properly fit Battleships.
If you really are interested in getting these ships properly balanced, wouldn't the best way to be to log in to SiSi when these ships go up, grab some data, maybe analyze it a little, and then provide feedback to CCP in a clean, non-emo manner? I know everyone has their emo button stuck lately, but isn't the time to rage when an inbalanced feature is planning to LEAVE SiSi and go live, not when it goes ONTO SiSi for initial testing? |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 15:47:00 -
[484] - Quote
Digital Gaidin wrote:What the hell is with all this bitching?
These ships look awesome, and there are many of us who are excited to see what the remaining 3 are going to look like. These ships are likely going to pack *near* BS firepower, be *near* their price, but be flimsier and faster. I've been around long enough to know that whatever CCP releases causes some to irrevicably feel the need to whine, *****, and moan... but seriously? This type of stuff is great, and if you can't get excited about this then what?
Calling it now, these ships end up with either Marauder style double weapon bonuses and 3 turrets, or normal 6 turret setups. Minmatar will probably be a split weapon system. Caldari is a toss up between another gun platform or a missile platform, though a high end Railgun platform with the new changes might be interesting (a pocket Rohk maybe?). At least one will probably be min/maxed to have some crazy tank and at least 2 of them will likely be generally ignored by the masses due to inherent weaknesses in the tank. Odds are, they will relatively invalidate current Tier 2 BC's for all but throw-away setups, but not stand up to properly fit Battleships.
If you really are interested in getting these ships properly balanced, wouldn't the best way to be to log in to SiSi when these ships go up, grab some data, maybe analyze it a little, and then provide feedback to CCP in a clean, non-emo manner? I know everyone has their emo button stuck lately, but isn't the time to rage when an inbalanced feature is planning to LEAVE SiSi and go live, not when it goes ONTO SiSi for initial testing?
If your interested, this is the latest clue to what looks like the New Gallente BC "Talos" ! " |

Duchess Starbuckington
Starbuckington Manor
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 16:14:00 -
[485] - Quote
Quote: Calling it now, these ships end up with either Marauder style double weapon bonuses and 3 turrets, or normal 6 turret setups. Minmatar will probably be a split weapon system. Caldari is a toss up between another gun platform or a missile platform, though a high end Railgun platform with the new changes might be interesting (a pocket Rohk maybe?)
You really need to read back a few pages. |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 16:17:00 -
[486] - Quote
Digital Gaidin wrote:What the hell is with all this bitching?
These ships look awesome, and there are many of us who are excited to see what the remaining 3 are going to look like. These ships are likely going to pack *near* BS firepower, be *near* their price, but be flimsier and faster. I've been around long enough to know that whatever CCP releases causes some to irrevicably feel the need to whine, *****, and moan... but seriously? This type of stuff is great, and if you can't get excited about this then what?
Calling it now, these ships end up with either Marauder style double weapon bonuses and 3 turrets, or normal 6 turret setups. Minmatar will probably be a split weapon system. Caldari is a toss up between another gun platform or a missile platform, though a high end Railgun platform with the new changes might be interesting (a pocket Rohk maybe?). At least one will probably be min/maxed to have some crazy tank and at least 2 of them will likely be generally ignored by the masses due to inherent weaknesses in the tank. Odds are, they will relatively invalidate current Tier 2 BC's for all but throw-away setups, but not stand up to properly fit Battleships.
If you really are interested in getting these ships properly balanced, wouldn't the best way to be to log in to SiSi when these ships go up, grab some data, maybe analyze it a little, and then provide feedback to CCP in a clean, non-emo manner? I know everyone has their emo button stuck lately, but isn't the time to rage when an inbalanced feature is planning to LEAVE SiSi and go live, not when it goes ONTO SiSi for initial testing?
In the current SISI client they are all set up to have 8 highs with hardpoints for 8 weapons and bonused to allow a full set of large turrets (or siege launchers for the naga, which has dual bonuses for large hybrids as well). I expect that this configuration won't survive to get to TQ, but at the moment there is no "nearly" about the firepower; it is equal to a T3 BS and far superior to the T1 & 2 BS's. As for "flimsier and faster", yes and hell yes. As someone pointed out to me the Tornado is over 40% faster than a Hurricane.
I agree that it's early days, but speculation is fun yes? |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 16:30:00 -
[487] - Quote
Neo Agricola wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote:Neo Agricola wrote:Imryn Xaran wrote: As for the ships - huge dps, paper thin tanks, low speed and agility, no drones - can anyone think of a use for them APART from high sec ganking?
Pos Bashing TCU Bashing Killing Supers Killing Carriers a.s.o.... btw: low speed and agility? Hurricane: 165 / Tornado 225.0 (current stat) I think current BS do all of those things as well or better, and provide much better survivability and utility when the **** hits the fan. Personally, I am training for Destroyers V, not BC V, and stocking up on Thrashers. They are desinged for a "Hit and run" concept. so when the **** hits the fan, you should be long gone. but lets discuss that, when we know the real stats. and again 5 month after that. than we will see, if they are used for anything else apart from High sec ganging. (BTW: WTS Tengu T2 fitted. when those BC hit Trianquiliti those High sec gankers will kill Tengus just for the LOLs)
I see what you are saying about hit and run - the real world BC's were supposed to outgun anything that could catch them and be faster than anything that outgunned them. The problem is that the concept of "outgunning" in the real world does not translate to EVE. In EVE a large turret (or a torpedo) shooting at a cruiser sized hull is at a disadvantage that a real world 15" naval gun firing at a cruiser just does not experience. A T2 fit HAML Tengu will orbit at 20km and laugh at the pitiful amount of dps you can apply to him in the short time it takes him to tear through your pitiful tank.
I do like the idea of them being Cap killers - fast enough to give capital guns big tracking problems, enough dps to get the job done, and cheap enough so you don't mind losing a few. |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 16:55:00 -
[488] - Quote
So can we also look forward to BattleShips that carry capital weapons???  |

JackStraw56
Bayesian Motion Knights of Tomorrow
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 17:17:00 -
[489] - Quote
This is the type of work CCP devs need to be doing, +1 for the readjustment of priorities :) |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 20:06:00 -
[490] - Quote
Just been looking through that change file for SISI and I noticed something - the CPU and PG values for the new ships:
Oracle: CPU 370, PG 1375 Naga: CPU 470, PG 895 Talos: CPU 400, PG 1150 Tornado: CPU 350, PG 990
Am I reading it wrong? Those numbers (in particular the PG values) will probably make it impossible to fit 8 large turrets.
Have they really do this? Given them the potential for T3 BS levels of firepower and then taken it away by limiting the CPU and PG?
Someone please tell me I read it wrong |
|

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 20:42:00 -
[491] - Quote
Imryn Xaran wrote:Just been looking through that change file for SISI and I noticed something - the CPU and PG values for the new ships:
Oracle: CPU 370, PG 1375 Naga: CPU 470, PG 895 Talos: CPU 400, PG 1150 Tornado: CPU 350, PG 990
Am I reading it wrong? Those numbers (in particular the PG values) will probably make it impossible to fit 8 large turrets.
Have they really do this? Given them the potential for T3 BS levels of firepower and then taken it away by limiting the CPU and PG?
Someone please tell me I read it wrong
I'm sure the % of CPU & PG reductions for modules given on the ships bonus's will allow for a balanced fit! |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 20:48:00 -
[492] - Quote
the change file also had multipliers for PG and cpu in it, for the weapon types they're supposed to use (large projectile for the tornado, for example). Generally 0.5 for cpu and 0.05 for PG. |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 21:25:00 -
[493] - Quote
Yeah, I saw the CPU and PG hull bonus's for fitting, but 50% of 1250 (large projectile turret) is still 625. I haven't run the math but I don't think you will fit 8 of them, even with AWU V etc.
Some guys have been experimenting with Tornado and Talos fits using a python fitting tool in another thread
[url]http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/9021/tornadoacfleet.png[/url] [url]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/5238/taloample.jpg[/url]
In the first one he has fitted 800mm Repeating Artillery II's (PG 2200, CPU 41) with a fitting cost of PG 99, CPU 15.4 That is a huge reduction in PG requirements and I wonder if he set the fitting tool wrong.
I guess what I am basing my suspicions on is the fact that the worst BS PG is the Dommi with 9000 - how can we fit 8 large turrets with the tiny PG they have given us? even with a 50% fitting bonus I would expect to see a PG of 4500, and instead we have 1/4 of that. |

Mr Floydy
The Xenodus Initiative. ORPHANS OF EVE
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 21:58:00 -
[494] - Quote
Um, 95% reduction in powergrid usage according to the suggested abilities? Taking the Amarr one as an example Based on that and my quick maths (after a long and tiring day - may be wrong) would suggest that 8 Tachyons (llooooads of grid usage normally) would take 1650 powergrid. The Amarr ship has 1375 - so it's not going to fit a full rack of T2 Tachs without fitting mods compromising the rest of the fit - which is fine.
Lets assume you have a mwd and a 1600mm plate on the fit, that's approx 650 grid used. Leaving 725 Grid. Enough to fit the lowest tier Battleship guns comfortably. Downgrade the plate and you'll fit more. Ofcourse this is all before taking into account skills boosting the basic grid of the ship (engineering) and fitting skills (advanced weapon upgrades)
Don't think we're going to be having an issue fitting guns to these at the moment...
|

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 22:11:00 -
[495] - Quote
Mr Floydy wrote:Um, 95% reduction in powergrid usage according to the suggested abilities? Taking the Amarr one as an example Based on that and my quick maths (after a long and tiring day - may be wrong) would suggest that 8 Tachyons (llooooads of grid usage normally) would take 1650 powergrid. The Amarr ship has 1375 - so it's not going to fit a full rack of T2 Tachs without fitting mods compromising the rest of the fit - which is fine.
Lets assume you have a mwd and a 1600mm plate on the fit, that's approx 650 grid used. Leaving 725 Grid. Enough to fit the lowest tier Battleship guns comfortably. Downgrade the plate and you'll fit more. Ofcourse this is all before taking into account skills boosting the basic grid of the ship (engineering) and fitting skills (advanced weapon upgrades)
Don't think we're going to be having an issue fitting guns to these at the moment...
Ok, thanks. I had mis-read the hull bonuses as 50% for both CPU and PG requirements. My bad :( |

Mr Floydy
The Xenodus Initiative. ORPHANS OF EVE
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.26 22:28:00 -
[496] - Quote
No probs :)
Just tried the new Pyfa build - it has the new ships in it. Oracle can fit T2 Tachs with a bit of space to spare if you want all out sniping ability :D Megapulse laser fit looks pretty sweet too, not as delicate as I was kinda worrying - however by no means tanky! |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 07:25:00 -
[497] - Quote
Which version of Python do you need to install for Pyfa? Thought I would give it a go but can't see which one I need - it just says that Python is a prerequisite |

Martineski
Weapons for Mass Destruction
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 18:58:00 -
[498] - Quote
ok so we can fit BS class weapons, but being that they are still Battlecruisers, will they retain the ability to equip Command links? i feel that it would be a disservice to leave that ability out. The idea of glass cannons is nice, and the trade off of defenses is nice, but it should still be able to provide a little fleet support. haven't rea all of hte blogs yet so don't flame me to death :) |

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:10:00 -
[499] - Quote
Mr Floydy wrote:No probs :)
Just tried the new Pyfa build - it has the new ships in it. Oracle can fit T2 Tachs with a bit of space to spare if you want all out sniping ability :D Megapulse laser fit looks pretty sweet too, not as delicate as I was kinda worrying - however by no means tanky!
I have been trying to find the version of pyfa with the new ships in it - with no luck. I have tried the version from:
http://pyfa.sourceforge.net/download.html
but that seems to be an old version. I have also tried:
http://www.evefit.org/Pyfa/Installation
The stable version (1.0.6) does not seem to have them, and the "nightly Installer" version at:
http://dl.evefit.org/nighty-netinst-latest-win.exe
does not have them either.
Is there another version that I am missing? Are they in the Mac version only? Do I need to do anything to make the new ships visible / available? Any help or advice would be appreciated |

Mr Floydy
The Xenodus Initiative. ORPHANS OF EVE
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:23:00 -
[500] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=256841#post256841
I used the version linked here :) Looks like it isn't an official release hence why it is more difficult to find. |
|

Imryn Xaran
Coherent Light Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.27 20:33:00 -
[501] - Quote
That works great. thanks very much |

Chavez Kurosaki
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 10:50:00 -
[502] - Quote
Wait for it..... What's their use? The guns are still gonna track like BS guns right? Trash, who wants these ships if there's no practical use?I won't be wasting the isk. |

Chavez Kurosaki
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 11:06:00 -
[503] - Quote
Another question, why in the hell aren't we using sub systems? We figured out how to use this sick sleeper tech then we make a crappy ship? Wtf we're collapsing like the Jovian empire and we didnt even make it as far as them.-á
Is this a money issue? Is that why the developers don't want to go into detail on this ship?-áI don't want to spend the isk on a POS ship even if it looks cool. Why is CCP on this trend of making things half assed? Sorry not a fanboy of this gold plated horse crap.-á |

TheButcherPete
StoneWall Metals Productions
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 12:23:00 -
[504] - Quote
Chavez Kurosaki wrote:Another question, why in the hell aren't we using sub systems? We figured out how to use this sick sleeper tech then we make a crappy ship? Wtf we're collapsing like the Jovian empire and we didnt even make it as far as them.-á
Is this a money issue? Is that why the developers don't want to go into detail on this ship?-áI don't want to spend the isk on a POS ship even if it looks cool. Why is CCP on this trend of making things half assed? Sorry not a fanboy of this gold plated horse crap.-á
umad, bro? It doesn't have subsystems because it's a tier 3, not a tech III. The only thing that tracks smaller ships well are smaller guns. Yes, it will fit battleship guns because the tier 3 BCs are designed to kill other BCs and Battleships. These ships also have a role in the killing of capitals and supercapitals, because they move like a butterfly and sting like a bee.
This ship appears to be symmetrical, sweet. |

Chavez Kurosaki
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:16:00 -
[505] - Quote
Im not your bro.lol Your answer for the subsystems is bullshit. You pull that out of your ass? Tech and tier that's all a figure of speech.
-áThe idea is, if the races of new Eden-áhave the technology now why aren't they using it? It's pretty sick ****.-á
My answer is that it would take to much development to make subsystems for new ships. Not only would it take more coding but the art team would have to make different designs for each subsystem. Hence the reference to money. Think a little before you post.-á
I wanna see these ships own caps... |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:39:00 -
[506] - Quote
Chavez Kurosaki wrote:Im not your bro.lol Your answer for the subsystems is bullshit. You pull that out of your ass? Tech and tier that's all a figure of speech.
-áThe idea is, if the races of new Eden-áhave the technology now why aren't they using it? It's pretty sick ****.-á
My answer is that it would take to much development to make subsystems for new ships. Not only would it take more coding but the art team would have to make different designs for each subsystem. Hence the reference to money. Think a little before you post.-á
I wanna see these ships own caps... Tech and tier are 2 different things and are not interchangeable, Cyclone is a Tier 1 BC, Hurricane Tier 2, Tornado will be tier 3. It's not a scaled up Loki and therefore doesn't have subs. And besides, what is the point of having user submitted designs if your going to throw them out of the window and rework each piece 3 times anyways? |

Chavez Kurosaki
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 05:42:00 -
[507] - Quote
OMG Tyberius where did you get your info? you're pulling crap out of thin air. STFU if you don't know what youre saying. It's all semantics. The question is not the meaning behind words but the "Technology" the races of New Eden have and why they would not continue to use that "technology"? all three of the strategic cruisers have a base design man.
In the real world, if the US Gov has some super f'ing cool technology they use that ****. They use the hell out of it, they over use it. Why isn't the Minmatar republic using it? is your reason because of the semantics of a word? Tier and Tech? really??? bullcrap. So an entire group of people are like, "We're not going to use this really sick technology that makes our ships so much fing cooler than our old **** because we would have to use the world "Tech" instead of "Tier"." WTF makes no sense. Thanks for try guy. or that entire race of people aren't going to use it because some engineer designed a certain way. WTF WTF so we don't build on the **** already created. All the other engineers in New Eden are like ah **** thats an Fing cool ship, man too bad he made it now we can't sup this **** up and make it even better. Bullcrap. If a ship designer was in competition with other ship designers, Why the Hell would he not put the best crap in there?
Stop with your semantics bullshit. Give me a real answer with a reference. You sound stupid when you talk. |

Asenghai
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 13:14:00 -
[508] - Quote
I'm more excited than a teenage girl in a Victoria's Secret shop lol! Keep em coming, want to see the new amarr and caldari ships |

Gazmin VanBurin
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 15:19:00 -
[509] - Quote
Chavez Kurosaki wrote:OMG Tyberius where did you get your info? you're pulling crap out of thin air. STFU if you don't know what youre saying. It's all semantics. The question is not the meaning behind words but the "Technology" the races of New Eden have and why they would not continue to use that "technology"? all three of the strategic cruisers have a base design man.
In the real world, if the US Gov has some super f'ing cool technology they use that ****. They use the hell out of it, they over use it. Why isn't the Minmatar republic using it? is your reason because of the semantics of a word? Tier and Tech? really??? bullcrap. So an entire group of people are like, "We're not going to use this really sick technology that makes our ships so much fing cooler than our old **** because we would have to use the world "Tech" instead of "Tier"." WTF makes no sense. Thanks for try guy. or that entire race of people aren't going to use it because some engineer designed a certain way. WTF WTF so we don't build on the **** already created. All the other engineers in New Eden are like ah **** thats an Fing cool ship, man too bad he made it now we can't sup this **** up and make it even better. Bullcrap. If a ship designer was in competition with other ship designers, Why the Hell would he not put the best crap in there?
Stop with your semantics bullshit. Give me a real answer with a reference. You sound stupid when you talk.
You sir don't know human nature, there is a ton of high level technology we have today that isent implimented by militarys simply because people are afraid of change. the military has always had a problem with "we know this weapon works so we will stick with it" its happened like this for 100s of years.
So yeah we have this new B-A tech but capsilirs are the only ones that fly it, no pirates or races militarys do. Its not hard to belive that one of the militarys RD had these BCs in development for years and just finaly finished, and with how it is in eve then sold the BPOs off to the other races for some extra spending money. The militarys mass produce them and we just happen to get some ourselfs since we Capsiliers are cool like that.
As for CCP not makign a Tech 3 its becase they needed a new ship out asap, and modular ships would take way longer to produce, and if they released a Tech 3 that wasent modular people would have a fit.
And yes there are teirs od ships, get over it. Teirs are represented by skils required to fly said ship and the obvious buff in stats that seperate ships in the same class.
|

Shlunky
1st Special Service Force
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 02:50:00 -
[510] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Chavez Kurosaki wrote:OMG Tyberius where did you get your info? you're pulling crap out of thin air. STFU if you don't know what youre saying. It's all semantics. The question is not the meaning behind words but the "Technology" the races of New Eden have and why they would not continue to use that "technology"? all three of the strategic cruisers have a base design man.
In the real world, if the US Gov has some super f'ing cool technology they use that ****. They use the hell out of it, they over use it. Why isn't the Minmatar republic using it? is your reason because of the semantics of a word? Tier and Tech? really??? bullcrap. So an entire group of people are like, "We're not going to use this really sick technology that makes our ships so much fing cooler than our old **** because we would have to use the world "Tech" instead of "Tier"." WTF makes no sense. Thanks for try guy. or that entire race of people aren't going to use it because some engineer designed a certain way. WTF WTF so we don't build on the **** already created. All the other engineers in New Eden are like ah **** thats an Fing cool ship, man too bad he made it now we can't sup this **** up and make it even better. Bullcrap. If a ship designer was in competition with other ship designers, Why the Hell would he not put the best crap in there?
Stop with your semantics bullshit. Give me a real answer with a reference. You sound stupid when you talk. You sir don't know human nature, there is a ton of high level technology we have today that isent implimented by militarys simply because people are afraid of change. the military has always had a problem with "we know this weapon works so we will stick with it" its happened like this for 100s of years. So yeah we have this new B-A tech but capsilirs are the only ones that fly it, no pirates or races militarys do. Its not hard to belive that one of the militarys RD had these BCs in development for years and just finaly finished, and with how it is in eve then sold the BPOs off to the other races for some extra spending money. The militarys mass produce them and we just happen to get some ourselfs since we Capsiliers are cool like that. As for CCP not makign a Tech 3 its becase they needed a new ship out asap, and modular ships would take way longer to produce, and if they released a Tech 3 that wasent modular people would have a fit. And yes there are teirs od ships, get over it. Teirs are represented by skils required to fly said ship and the obvious buff in stats that seperate ships in the same class.
As much as I appreciate your response to this person, he is simply a troll. I wouldn't waste any more on him....
Personally, about the ship, i am hesitant. I like that they are adding new ships. I think that the game has been stale in that department too long. This isn't the direction I would like for them to have gone though. Personally, I would have rather had a T2 tier 2 BC.
As it is, it seems like they are giving this roughly command ship DPS in a T1 tier 3 BC. They say BS dps in a faster hull. Isn't that where BC's are already?
I will wait to see how it rolls out before my final judgement is made... Hopefully they (CCP) will keep going with introducing more to the game, especially in the area of ships. |
|

Jaigar
Mom 'n' Pop Ammo Shoppe Transmission Lost
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 03:45:00 -
[511] - Quote
What you need to consider is this: will these ships have enough tank to give logi's the time to even rep them?
Consider this, a 15-man fleet of these new ships runs up against a 15-man fleet of drakes or hurricanes. Sure, the new tier 3 ships may have a ton more DPS, but even if there are equal logi's on both sides, can the tier 3 fleet drop the the canes or hurricanes sufficently faster? Also, if they have even only 70% of the current BC tank (lets just say around 50k EHP), will a 15-man fleet alpha from canes/drakes be too much for them to handle?
I believe the new tier 3 BCs will function somewhat like the tier 3 BSs. Take for example, a maelstrom. It does great damage and a sturdier shield tank than the tier 2 BS, but its slow, has little room for eWAR and a slow lock time. I imagine that the tornado will match a cane in slots(maybe 1 less low), and the powergrid will be set up in a way so that 1 powergrid mod lets you upgrade from 650s to 800s or so, or lets you use another LSE, etc. To be honest, I don't expect that 1400s will fit on the tornado. But the key to the tornado being balanced is that its advantages need to be severely diminished if the ship is flown with a heavy tank. |

Jenn Makanen
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
35
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:26:00 -
[512] - Quote
from the look of the numbers, the tank's probably between a t1 cruiser and a BC. |

Phantomania
Alien Ship Builders Caedite Eos
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 19:08:00 -
[513] - Quote
Caldari Naga- Official
Amarr Oracle- Official |

Jerek Mothas
Eleutherian Guard
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 01:30:00 -
[514] - Quote
In rust we trust. Long live the Republic! (This oughta keep those Amarrian bastards off our backs!) |

Gorou Dai
Saikutsu Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 09:11:00 -
[515] - Quote
I would be happier with a Tornado Battlership, but Im looking forward to try it anyway. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD
141
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:17:00 -
[516] - Quote
I doubt those are "official" at all. Wheres your proof?
I do however believe the Amarr Oracle since it was the second contest winner and it makes sense while also looking cool. The Caldari one is one I voted for but I will be surprised if that one is really the winner for this. That would look rather odd as a Battlecruiser as it is clearly meant to be very large.
Edit: On second thought...if they did shrink that down a bit those sides would be awesome for oversized gun platforms so long as said guns looked really huge on them. Support our boobies!-áLINKY! |

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:25:00 -
[517] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I doubt those are "official" at all. Wheres your proof? I do however believe the Amarr Oracle since it was the second contest winner and it makes sense while also looking cool. The Caldari one is one I voted for but I will be surprised if that one is really the winner for this. That would look rather odd as a Battlecruiser as it is clearly meant to be very large. Edit: On second thought...if they did shrink that down a bit those sides would be awesome for oversized gun platforms so long as said guns looked really huge on them.
Check the second art department video blog. A rough design of the Caldari and Amarr Tier 3 BC hulls is briefly shown. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
103
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 11:22:00 -
[518] - Quote
Jaigar wrote:What you need to consider is this: will these ships have enough tank to give logi's the time to even rep them?
Consider this, a 15-man fleet of these new ships runs up against a 15-man fleet of drakes or hurricanes. Sure, the new tier 3 ships may have a ton more DPS, but even if there are equal logi's on both sides, can the tier 3 fleet drop the the canes or hurricanes sufficently faster? Also, if they have even only 70% of the current BC tank (lets just say around 50k EHP), will a 15-man fleet alpha from canes/drakes be too much for them to handle?
I believe the new tier 3 BCs will function somewhat like the tier 3 BSs. Take for example, a maelstrom. It does great damage and a sturdier shield tank than the tier 2 BS, but its slow, has little room for eWAR and a slow lock time. I imagine that the tornado will match a cane in slots(maybe 1 less low), and the powergrid will be set up in a way so that 1 powergrid mod lets you upgrade from 650s to 800s or so, or lets you use another LSE, etc. To be honest, I don't expect that 1400s will fit on the tornado. But the key to the tornado being balanced is that its advantages need to be severely diminished if the ship is flown with a heavy tank.
I'd say 15 of those new toy's vs 15 arty canes, the diff would probably come from the fc tactics and fits.
If 15 of those new toys jump too close or are dropped too close by AC canes, there's no match. Cane fleet will win, a triple gyro double TE cane can push tremendous dps and still have high mobility, over 40k EHP, fit web or scram or both.
|

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 15:15:00 -
[519] - Quote
I just tested the Tornado on Singularity. My basic PvP fit:
8x 800mm AC ll 10 MN MWD ll, 2x LSE ll, Azetrophic EM ward, Warp Disrupter ll DCU ll, TE ll, 2x Gyrostab ll
Okay, no dronebay but fast enough with a MWD (1661m/s) and with the falloff bonus and a tracking enhancer basic ammo gave me 46km falloff and barrage even 70km.
So the Tornado is a kick ass ship that can kite and wear down it's enemies from distance. A pocket Machariel  |

Korvin
Shadow Kingdom Best Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 16:31:00 -
[520] - Quote
Goodbye empire citizens, flying anything smaller than a battlecruiser or anything with a price more than a 60 mil in a fit or cargo.
Now what I will do - is drop all my good ships in a station for a year, and fly cheap fitted drake now. Good job.
|
|

Remarka Belle Locus
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 03:37:00 -
[521] - Quote
Y'know, we've got some great, fairly desktop-worthy images of the other Tier 3 Ships, can we get one for the Tornado please? |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:35:00 -
[522] - Quote
tornado needs a nerf , 840dps ac with 60km falloff easy to hit even frigs ... or just fit arties and do nearly tempest alpha for half the hull price... is this supposed to be a joke? becuse it is not funny, i bet tempest fleets will be changed into tornado fleets cheaper faster and capstable with mwd on ... so imbalanced also they will do the job better due to tracking bonus and faster lock and speed |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
126
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 00:58:00 -
[523] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:tornado needs a nerf , 840dps ac with 60km falloff easy to hit even frigs ... or just fit arties and do nearly tempest alpha for half the hull price... is this supposed to be a joke? becuse it is not funny, i bet tempest fleets will be changed into tornado fleets cheaper faster and capstable with mwd on ... so imbalanced also they will do the job better due to tracking bonus and faster lock and speed
Actually there's no reason to fly something else in fleets or gangs. Let's see what's the next they will nerf (more) and witch buff they will add to this one. |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 11:40:00 -
[524] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Naomi Knight wrote:tornado needs a nerf , 840dps ac with 60km falloff easy to hit even frigs ... or just fit arties and do nearly tempest alpha for half the hull price... is this supposed to be a joke? becuse it is not funny, i bet tempest fleets will be changed into tornado fleets cheaper faster and capstable with mwd on ... so imbalanced also they will do the job better due to tracking bonus and faster lock and speed Actually there's no reason to fly something else in fleets or gangs. Let's see what's the next they will nerf (more) and witch buff they will add to this one.
Ya no fear. There going to buff Hybirds some more so that means Winmatar weapons will probly get better again. I am also looking forward to the buff to the Naga mybe there will be some kind of other buff for amarr hidden in that one so they can keep up with Winmatar.
O wait I know mybe there going to add a target painting bounce to Tornado next and turn the Naga in to a Hybird ship with no missiles.
At least it sounds like something CCP would do. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
128
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 11:43:00 -
[525] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:Naomi Knight wrote:tornado needs a nerf , 840dps ac with 60km falloff easy to hit even frigs ... or just fit arties and do nearly tempest alpha for half the hull price... is this supposed to be a joke? becuse it is not funny, i bet tempest fleets will be changed into tornado fleets cheaper faster and capstable with mwd on ... so imbalanced also they will do the job better due to tracking bonus and faster lock and speed Actually there's no reason to fly something else in fleets or gangs. Let's see what's the next they will nerf (more) and witch buff they will add to this one. Ya no fear. There going to buff Hybirds some more so that means Winmatar weapons will probly get better again. I am also looking forward to the buff to the Naga mybe there will be some kind of other buff for amarr hidden in that one so they can keep up with Winmatar. O wait I know mybe there going to add a target painting bounce to Tornado next and turn the Naga in to a Hybird ship with no missiles. At least it sounds like something CCP would do. 
Just saw some Naga log last night when we were shooting some cap stuff: "Your Citadel Torpedo does (about) 27K dmg to..."  |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:01:00 -
[526] - Quote
it is good to see tornado able to fit 2 large shield extenders besides 800mm t2 ac-s +mwd.... it is so paper...
also love how with guns only fitted have more spare cpu than the nage siege missiles only fitted.... oh and have the best 5/4 medlow slot layout which is much less cpu intensive as the nagas 6/3 btw why tracking comps are so crap compared to tracking enhacers??? it needs cap , +20cpu to fit which is huge , and you have to activate it too , crappy it should give more optimal and tracking |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:39:00 -
[527] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:it is good to see tornado able to fit 2 large shield extenders besides 800mm t2 ac-s +mwd.... it is so paper...
also love how with guns only fitted have more spare cpu than the nage siege missiles only fitted.... oh and have the best 5/4 medlow slot layout which is much less cpu intensive as the nagas 6/3 btw why tracking comps are so crap compared to tracking enhacers??? it needs cap , +20cpu to fit which is huge , and you have to activate it too , crappy it should give more optimal and tracking
the best part is siege missile l needs a little more pg than 800mm ac to fit on them... wtf.... who the hell calls that balance?
It's the Winmatar flow. So just go with the flow.  |

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 08:41:00 -
[528] - Quote
Rip Minner wrote:It's the Winmatar flow. So just go with the flow.  yes but it is for 3 years by now , kinda gets booring |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
143
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:56:00 -
[529] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:Rip Minner wrote:It's the Winmatar flow. So just go with the flow.  yes but it is for 3 years by now , kinda gets booring
I'm also bored of flying angel and minmatar over my toon's first race, specially to shoot angel minmatar and amarr stuff.
Well some time a blob of drakes here'n there but it's so boring.
|

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 06:47:00 -
[530] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:Rip Minner wrote:It's the Winmatar flow. So just go with the flow.  yes but it is for 3 years by now , kinda gets booring
Almost as boring as your 'nerf Minmitar', boost everything else' agenda.
Sad things was you were still singing the SAME tune 3 years ago when Minmitar NEEDED a boost.
You are joke.
|
|

Naomi Knight
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:04:00 -
[531] - Quote
So how to balance this ship?
I would remove falloff bonus , changed it to something not weapon related. And would make it able to use ac-s only , no fitting bonuses for arties. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
176
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:38:00 -
[532] - Quote
Naomi Knight wrote:So how to balance this ship?
I would remove falloff bonus , changed it to something not weapon related. And would make it able to use ac-s only , no fitting bonuses for arties.
Actually is take off a middle slot or low one (less tank or less dps mods) because it tanks too good and (hp and speed) has the best dmg projection/application of all 4 atm
If this means a problem because of same number of slots than other BC's have, it's clearly the guns that are in need of nerf stick, change the dmg/rof/falloff whatever bonus |

Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 09:24:00 -
[533] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:Naomi Knight wrote:So how to balance this ship?
I would remove falloff bonus , changed it to something not weapon related. And would make it able to use ac-s only , no fitting bonuses for arties. Actually is take off a middle slot or low one (less tank or less dps mods) because it tanks too good and (hp and speed) has the best dmg projection/application of all 4 atm If this means a problem because of same number of slots than other BC's have, it's clearly the guns that are in need of nerf stick, change the dmg/rof/falloff whatever bonus
O ya no CCP would never do that. They have to much time invested in the Trust in Rust moto to cave now.
But realy what are the cons to projectial weapons
1.) 10 sec reload timer?
I cant think of any other drawback. Now if you too can not think of any other drawback to projectails then plz list the drawbacks of the other two weapon systems of Hybirds and Lazers.
So to realy balance a game you realy need to have just as many drawbacks as you do con's for every weapon system at least when there all gunnery weapon systems.
It's like Hybirds=flintlock black powder riffles and Projectials=Mk16's or want ever. Now what armry is going to fight back with flintlock black powder riffles when there enemys are cuting them down with Mk16's. I will tell you what kind of armry a dead armry thats who.
And then rest of the world is going to see that flintlock black powder armry get cut down and though away all there flintlock blackpowder riffles and get them selfs some Mk16's.
Edit: So whats the point of all that bs I just though up there. 1.) Remove all but one draw back on Hybirds and Lazors or 2.) Add drawbacks to projectials and now your starting to balance things. Balancing the Pro's and Con's of all Gunnery weapon systems to have a fair and even mix of Pro's and Con's should be your first step in realy balance this crap. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
189
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 13:51:00 -
[534] - Quote
If you want your guns to perform you need at least 3 MFS's and 2 TE's on your hybrid platform.
That should be possible for shield ships like caldari but they have other issues like not enough pg... Then you return on your blaster tub, holly shift, 5 low slots only to improve dps and dmg projection at the level of projectiles/lasers?
Yeah, now tell me how you fit your tank, or how you can fit the required mwd+web+scram/disruptor/cap injector No one will make me believe we're all gonna drop the cap injector after the winter expansion, will just be worst when you'll face Tornados, they don't need to neut you, all they have to do is orbit uner web at over 600m/s and put the misery on you with the largest short range weapon system while you're spining around and miserably die.
Hybrids and gallente overall is an excellent concept, almost perfect, just nerfed by traumatised souls and drunken people to the point their single existence in game is pointless and an insult to intelligence.
|

Zhephell
Capts Deranged Cavaliers Strategic Defense Initiative Organization
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 13:02:00 -
[535] - Quote
Hi, I see that new t3 battle cruisers are really easy to fit. The only one that has some difficulty to fit is the Naga, but compared to other ships specially battle ships those ships have a lot of power ( 95% reduction at bs guns has as result guns that need less power that cruiser guns, and t3 bc power is similar as t2 battle cruisers) Tornado and oracle are really easy to fit, as easy that I can see this in some forums:
((( [Oracle, armour] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Heat Sink II
Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive Warp Disruptor II X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator
Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
41km optimal, 450dps with scorch, 650dps with conflag, 70k EHP.
[Tornado, loool] Reactor Control Unit II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II
Quad LiF Fueled I Booster Rockets Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Stasis Webifier II Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Navy Cap Booster 800
Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L
Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Ancillary Current Router I
900dps with Hail, 800 with RF EMP, 600 with barrage and 75km fall off.... @ 4.3km/s - Yes, it's 29 seconds of align time but you accelerate to 1.5kms faster than you do if you only had a 10mn MWD so v0v. )))
An Oracle with 70k EHP !! That is more that many t2 bc that are supposed to have more ehp, and this oracle has mwd. Harbis and prophecy = trash compared with this oracle I have seen at you tube a video at the sisi server which had an oracle with 8 mega beam lasers, with active tank, afterburner, and cap booster and with any module to increase power , video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq-DrWnP--8
There is any amarr bs that can use 8 mega beams with any power control system , reactor control units or any Ancillary Current Router. And many times they need 2
And the tornado can use a BS MWD and have all his guns !!! wtf is this? I know that now it has 5% of falloff bonus and no more 10% so it isn t as difficult to kill, but T3 battle cruisers are really fast and very easy to fit, some ships as ACs tempest or ACs Maelstrom are worst that some tornados (why? Very simple, is your ship can be hunted because it is faster that the other ships, it has more chances to survive that a Maelstrom, and ll be cheaper.)
I hope that you have already noticed those things at sisi server
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
202
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 14:13:00 -
[536] - Quote
Zhephell wrote:Hi, I see that new t3 battle cruisers are really easy to fit. The only one that has some difficulty to fit is the Naga, but compared to other ships specially battle ships those ships have a lot of power ( 95% reduction at bs guns has as result guns that need less power that cruiser guns, and t3 bc power is similar as t2 battle cruisers) Tornado and oracle are really easy to fit, as easy that I can see this in some forums: ((( [Oracle, armour] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Damage Control II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Heat Sink II Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive Warp Disruptor II X5 Prototype I Engine Enervator Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Dual Heavy Pulse Laser II, Scorch L Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I Medium Trimark Armor Pump I 41km optimal, 450dps with scorch, 650dps with conflag, 70k EHP. [Tornado, loool] Reactor Control Unit II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Quad LiF Fueled I Booster Rockets Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Tracking Computer II, Optimal Range Stasis Webifier II Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Navy Cap Booster 800 Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Dual 425mm AutoCannon II, Hail L Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Ancillary Current Router I 900dps with Hail, 800 with RF EMP, 600 with barrage and 75km fall off.... @ 4.3km/s - Yes, it's 29 seconds of align time but you accelerate to 1.5kms faster than you do if you only had a 10mn MWD so v0v. ))) An Oracle with 70k EHP !! That is more that many t2 bc that are supposed to have more ehp, and this oracle has mwd. Harbis and prophecy = trash compared with this oracle I have seen at you tube a video at the sisi server which had an oracle with 8 mega beam lasers, with active tank, afterburner, and cap booster and with any module to increase power , video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jq-DrWnP--8There is any amarr bs that can use 8 mega beams with any power control system , reactor control units or any Ancillary Current Router. And many times they need 2 And the tornado can use a BS MWD and have all his guns !!! wtf is this? I know that now it has 5% of falloff bonus and no more 10% so it isn t as difficult to kill, but T3 battle cruisers are really fast and very easy to fit, some ships as ACs tempest or ACs Maelstrom are worst that some tornados (why? Very simple, is your ship can be hunted because it is faster that the other ships, it has more chances to survive that a Maelstrom, and ll be cheaper.) I hope that you have already noticed those things at sisi server
Well the only way to get some dps from talos is to shield fit it, then you have 17k ehp, has you can see these numbers are far from 70k EHP of your oracle, and far away from it's engagement range/dmg application, but once in range this shield fit will OC own your oracle by high margin (1 TE 4 MFS in lows) |

Jake McCord
Greater Metropolis Sanitation Service Barbarian Wine and Cheese Society
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 15:49:00 -
[537] - Quote
At last, a Battlecruiser that is actually a battlecruiser.
For those who don't read history, (as well as those who don't read at all) 20th Century BCs carried guns as big as battleships. The major difference, they didn't have the armor protection that battleships had. But they had another advantage, speed. The idea of the battlecruiser, it was supposed to be able to run away from any thing it couldn't beat, and kill every thing else.
The one thing that always bugged me about EVE, was calling the Hurricane and others like her, a battlecruiser, when she had guns no bigger than what you'd find on a Ruppy. Maybe should have called the tier 1 and 2 BCs heavy cruisers instead.
Ok, I'm done now.  |

Stoney Balboa
Delsu Foundation
1
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 16:43:00 -
[538] - Quote
Imho, the Tornado is slightly UP. It does have a great speed and range, but the dps is really too low compared to the other BCs. Talos, 1100 dps, balanced. Oracle, 1000 dps, balanced. Naga, 1000 dps, balanced. Torndado, 780 dps, kinda balanced (not easy to fit 2 gyros in 4 low slots - where u also want DC, TE and nano) Its dps should be uped by 10%, that would be fair i guess.
what ya think?...
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .. 18 :: [one page] |