Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Barakkus
987
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 14:36:00 -
[61] - Quote
Friendly Gank wrote:always seems odd to me that griefers are just about the most risk averse people you can find. this might actually be worth a thread if they went after some of the more serious incursions bears like sk33t or SSN
SSN aren't bears bro. I know nothing about sk33t. http://youtu.be/5CSxjFRmzkU ...unfotrunately, Saturday was reeeaaaallly slow... Day before that we took down a carrier 
We just like to get money to go pvp with. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 15:28:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:Ammzi wrote: PS: Saying highsec incursions is one of the best ISK features is a bit flawed. You do realise that highsec incursions only pay out 60 % of the reward that is paid out in nullsec and lowsec?
And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. You need to step your game up a bit more before we notice anything on our wallets.
quoting you saying that highsec incursions dont make much ISK followed by you saying high sec incursions make 30 - 40 billion ISK AN HOUR.
People like you wanna make me rip my hair chest out and scream STUPID STUPID STUPID SO INCREDIBLY DUMB AND IDIOTICALLY STUPID WITH NO UNDERSTANDING OF LOGIC WHAT SO EVER.
Now you listen to me, you less-intelligent-I-have-no-idea-how-you-survive being. Highsec incursions in comparison to nullsec/lowsec incursions will earn you a lot less isk. So highsec incursions are LESS profitable than nullsec/lowsec incursions (do you get it now?). So yes, my incredibly illogical friend, highsec incursions don't make much isk IN ******* COMPARISON TO NULLSEC AND LOWSEC INCURSIONS LIKE I WROTE IN MY POST.
Highsec incursions in general generate 30-40 billion isk an hour, an estimate that I calculated depending on different variables (not per person, but in total for a hypothetical 3 highsec incursion scenario).
In your quote you imply that my statement is illogical. It is not and I should not be to blame for your brain's inability to understand arguments.
PS: If you simply misread or misunderstood the post, fine ... I'll say sorry for the above rant ^ on your person. But seriously, don't even attempt to discuss with people if you really fail at that or at least ask me to elaborate. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 17:34:00 -
[63] - Quote
U mad bro?
but seriously, incursions pay out to well not just in isk but in LP as well, the main problem in it is that as long as you dotn kill the mother ship you can keep getting the sites to spawn over and over, there should be a cap on how many sites can spawn for each incursion till you 'have' to kill the mother ship and end the incursion.
Joining Sansha isent so bad, you get great health care. |

Psychotic Monk
Go Petition Blizzard
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ammzi, my complaint against them isn't as much the isk they make, but the isk they make compared to the risk to the pilot/ship. Until we came along, that is. :P
Although that's really a discussion best had in one of the other sub-forums.
Speaking of money, we hit just a hair short of 40b killed last night. I was originally gunning for 60b killed in a week, but I think we're going to well exceed that. I wish there was an emoticon that let me properly express my feelings about that. Is there an overjoyed emoticon? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
but seriously, incursions pay out to well not just in isk but in LP as well, the main problem in it is that as long as you dotn kill the mother ship you can keep getting the sites to spawn over and over, there should be a cap on how many sites can spawn for each incursion till you 'have' to kill the mother ship and end the incursion.
U jelly bro?
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
Joining Sansha isent so bad, you get great health care.
No **** ... I have sansha loyalists screaming all over space "THERE IS NO DEATH IN NATION!!!111" Delusional fools  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 19:26:00 -
[66] - Quote
Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. |

Barakkus
1000
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away.
How much rope did they have? |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:49:00 -
[68] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have?
Well they wernt Spelunkers so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? |

Barakkus
1001
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate?
The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word  |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:55:00 -
[70] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word 
Ah sorry I knew my terible spelling skills would come back to bite me, i saw it was misspelled later but didnt want to edit for one word. Well played good sir |
|

Barakkus
1001
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
lol, I'm just in the mood to nit-pick. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
229
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:lol, I'm just in the mood to nit-pick. Gaz will keep you quite busy. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:38:00 -
[73] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word 
Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com.
Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick...
~Andrei. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Andrei, are you defending Gaz's posting, really? |

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
274
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word  Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com. Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick... ~Andrei.
Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood....
American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years.
The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means
verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladle
Carry on hehe Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 01:02:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cerisia wrote:Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood.... American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years. The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladleCarry on hehe 
This is a much stronger argumentative stance than that of Barakkus, and as far as I can tell the only use of payed that isn't an irregular verb; however, it's irksome to see people on the internet arguing points that cannot stand on their own feet. Using an irregular form of a verb is not the same as misspelling that verb. If you want to play grammar/spelling **** (fan of WW2 Germany, for the filter), at least read a book first.
To close my case, I will simply side with Henry Fielding:
"In reality, the world have payed too great a compliment to critics, and have imagined them men of much greater profundity than they really are."
If you don't like Gaz's use of payed, or my defense of it, take it up with the great English novelist... Oh, and don't be so quick to blame the Americans, eh?
~Andrei. |

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
274
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 01:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Cerisia wrote:Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood.... American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years. The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladleCarry on hehe  This is a much stronger argumentative stance than that of Barakkus, and as far as I can tell the only use of payed that isn't an irregular verb; however, it's irksome to see people on the internet arguing points that cannot stand on their own feet. Using an irregular form of a verb is not the same as misspelling that verb. If you want to play grammar/spelling **** (fan of WW2 Germany, for the filter), at least read a book first. To close my case, I will simply side with Henry Fielding: "In reality, the world have payed too great a compliment to critics, and have imagined them men of much greater profundity than they really are." If you don't like Gaz's use of payed, or my defense of it, take it up with the great English novelist... Oh, and don't be so quick to blame the Americans, eh? ~Andrei.
Blimey!
Calm down dear, I was only having a laugh.... Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

Aggressive Nutmeg
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:04:00 -
[78] - Quote
Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling.
I think I'll stick to speaking English.
The word is 'paid'.  |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
264
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:24:00 -
[79] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
I blame a Dilbert cartoon from about 10-15 years ago that used "payed" instead of "paid" in one of the panels.
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
I'm gonna go ahead and call this one a flat out troll.
The word is 'misspell.' (Also, the period goes inside the quotes.) Additionally, I presented a great Eton educated chap who made use of this 'correct variant spelling' long before any of these fellows came along.
I guess that means I did let you troll me, though, so good on that.
Seriously though, why has our glorious grief thread become the place for people to illustrate their inability to criticize a perfectly acceptable usage of English language? Back to the Incursion griefing, and that's where I'll be...
~Andrei. |
|

SOLMEN
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 03:26:00 -
[81] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
121
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 03:29:00 -
[82] - Quote
SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. well iceland is closer to england than to the usa so there  |

Aggressive Nutmeg
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 05:35:00 -
[83] - Quote
SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be.
That would be 'bastardised' and 'Americanised'. 
The English language has evolved and changed over time. No prizes there. What annoys me is when a language evolves from sheer ignorance and laziness. Thanks America!
Good luck with your English subdialect. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 06:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
Back on topic!
We hit 49.93B destroyed tonight, before the incursion channels became ghost towns:
n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:32 ] Mari Sinn > is nobody else on? n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:42 ] Rushkow > I am. n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:51 ] Rushkow > But I don't think there's much incursion going on right now n++[ 2011.11.03 05:55:24 ] Mari Sinn > dang this channel is usually very active during an incursion n++[ 2011.11.03 05:59:24 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > yeah I wonder what happened to it. n++[ 2011.11.03 06:00:40 ] Mari Sinn > maybe it's just to late n++[ 2011.11.03 06:00:47 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > That could be it. n++[ 2011.11.03 06:03:27 ] Mari Sinn > well there's always tomorrow fly safe n++[ 2011.11.03 06:03:55 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > Right.
Yup, there's always tomorrow...
KB can be found here.
Fly safe guys! 
~Andrei.
[ninja edit for KB link, I think it might be against the forum rules--although not in the rules so far as I glanced over them.] |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 07:30:00 -
[85] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. That would be 'bastardised' and 'Americanised'.  The English language has evolved and changed over time. No prizes there. What annoys me is when a language evolves from sheer ignorance and laziness. Thanks America! Good luck with your English subdialect.
That's what happens when one evolves. Things change. Sometimes for the better. How's that silly c*nt ruling your country? Still working for ya? |

Barakkus
1004
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 13:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:
Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com.
Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick...
~Andrei.
It amazes me how ignorance perverts the English language. As far back as I can remember it was never used for a representation of "payment". I guess the more people misspell words or misuse them they get added with their perversions to the "dictionary". I was dumbfounded when they added ain't to the dictionary 10 or 15 years ago. What the hell is ain't a contraction of? There certainly isn't a word "ai" unless you are discussing artificial intelligence, artificial insemination or some weird sloth from South America. I'm not sure how any of those could be contracted and/or be used in reference to what "ain't" is supposed to mean.
...and no, "languages evolve" is not a valid defense for not using proper grammar and spelling imo... It's a cop-out. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:09:00 -
[87] - Quote
Yeah Btl pub was really quiet aswell lastnight :( shame, I guess all the incersioners isk presses broke down.
Oh and as far as im concerned the internet (and texting) has created it own language, like lol. Its all about using terible gramer and spelling which was widly adopted world wide, fancy that.
So if everyone promises to stop using text speak, we can all go back to using high english on the marrow good sir. |

Barakkus
1004
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:40:00 -
[88] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Yeah Btl pub was really quiet aswell lastnight :( shame, I guess all the incersioners isk presses broke down.
Oh and as far as im concerned the internet (and texting) has created it own language, like lol. Its all about using terible gramer and spelling which was widly adopted world wide, fancy that.
So if everyone promises to stop using text speak, we can all go back to using high english on the marrow good sir.
Touch+¬  |

Odemis
The Skunkworks
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 16:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss |

Barakkus
1005
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 16:59:00 -
[90] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss
Getting back on topic now; at one point we (Skunks) had complete control over the local incursion channel for the better part of 2 hours. Both BTL and TDF channels seemed confined to non fleet-forming chatter as well. Mostly people just talked about different strategies and fittings for their favorite shiny faction BS or t3. This could mean several things: We've frightened enough incursionbears into not pursuing their favorite past time, it was just an off night, or maybe they are hanging out in the opposite high-sec incursion. Personally I think that public fleets aren't being formed as often.
It's usually like that in BTL with a spattering of **** fit / **** ships linked xing up. Mostly people just trolling each other or conversing then a rash of xing up then more trolling and chatter. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |