Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 19:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
You may have seen our man Slimy Worm featured in some other Incursion griefing threads around here. He nabbed a couple logi here and there and a fun time was had by all. Except the logi, but **** carebears anyways.
Then Skunkworks got a dec from God Squad. That was a bit of a head scratcher for us, as we had just started making friendly with them a bit over a mutual war against No Kings. We had a convo with God Squad and they claimed that a bunch of people from the BTL channel hired them to dec us. I don't generally take things like that at face value, but one of our men had an email exchange shortly afterwards with carmelos53:
Quote:-.- really??? really?? lol listen we know you guys juat want to play the game grief and laugh. I get it I really do. about 5 months ago people started pitching in to war dec the people who grief them in incs..... it isn't btl.. it isn't tdf...
its people who you angered. you personally never kileld me, a corp or an alliance mate or even a friend. when people send killmails and you reach a certain number we ask for public donations if we get everything we need we go with the community's request to dec.
Nothing personal. I know you guys deal with god squad and frankly it doesn't bother me if you dont fight. if they keep paying someone gets hired that is just the way it goes.
when you get bored... contact me and I vote up a vote if they want to stop deccing... in general that is how it works.
Messenger only <----
btw I do still hate you :P
He added in a later email:
Quote:oh by the way if it means anything to you 193 peopel pitched in. enough for 3 months on you. hope you are happy
Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence.
Not that we won't do them, because, like neutral logi, you would be dumb if you didn't use all the tools at your disposal.
In any case, though, tears are delicious.
For this reason, The Skunkworks has declared an unofficial war on BTL Pub and incursions in general. What started as casual griefing to pass the time will become a full-time occupation until we tire of it. If you thought Slimy Worm was bad, now he's bringing friends.
The campaign against Incursioners started last night. One guardian, six Basilisks, three Machariels, two Vargurs, and a Nightmare were destroyed in a few hours. Over six billion isk in ships and modules were lost or stolen. One Incursion fleet landed in a Sansha deadspace without the logistics they were expecting. The panicked FC's commands were broadcast over our comms; we listened as they scrambled to evacuate and save their precious ships.
This stops when we get bored, or when The God Squad's war dec is retracted on orders from the people who hired them and someone diplos their way out of it. A ransom might be involved. I hadn't really thought that part out yet. If you want a war with the Skunkworks, we will deliver it. |

Reppyk
The Black Shell
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 19:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would like to play a Sansha NPC. Just to kill all these carebear scums.
Good luck, have fun, **** them. |

Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
313
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 19:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
I am not really up to speed on everything you guys doing, but I most definitely approve. Gos Squad is rumored to have some pretty good pliots, but I don't know them really well. They wardecced Brick this week, but we pulled out of hisec before that happened as GS retracted their war dec :(.
Slimy Worm has many fans here-he has done great work. Do you guys have a public channel perhaps? I'd love to send in a few guys but CBA to organize anything etc. If Women aren't supposed to do the cooking, why are their bodies full of milk and eggs? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote: Then Skunkworks got a dec from God Squad. That was a bit of a head scratcher for us, as we had just started making friendly with them a bit over a mutual war against No Kings. We had a convo with God Squad and they claimed that a bunch of people from the BTL channel hired them to dec us.
As a representative from BTL pub I'd like to firmly point out that BTL operators, moderators or FC's generally in charge have not issued any war declarations on behalf of BTL Pub. Our simple goal is to provide incursions for everyone, everywhere at anytime. When you say "people from BTL" that means pilots who use our service (channel) that are non-affiliated with BTL pub. Your reasoning for a "war declaration" is therefore put on a wrong basis.
Now let me rephrase your declaration of war into something we can all generally agree on.
"Rich highsec pubbies hired mercs to wardec us and now we want payback."
If there's anything else you might wonder about or any questions, feel free to drop me a mail.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
55
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Only a pubbie would think that people other than Goons use the term "pubbie". |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
I definitely want us to be able to bring in others who wish to participate in this. The problem lies in making sure we don't bring in people who would spoil it all either by directly spying, or by being idiots. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 21:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Only a pubbie would think that people other than Goons use the term "pubbie".
*pokes Vimsy with a stick* You go back under your bridge and eat your children. I spell pubbie the way I want to, even it's gonna be puppie with a heart over the i. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ammzi wrote: As a representative from BTL pub I'd like to firmly point out that BTL operators, moderators or FC's generally in charge have not issued any war declarations on behalf of BTL Pub. Our simple goal is to provide incursions for everyone, everywhere at anytime. When you say "people from BTL" that means pilots who use our service (channel) that are non-affiliated with BTL pub. Your reasoning for a "war declaration" is therefore put on a wrong basis.
v0v Talk to carmelos53, since he made himself out to be a representative of BTL pub.
And yeah, we're not putting that big of a dent in the overall incursion wallet, and probably never will have the manpower to do that.
What we can do is get everyone afraid to join a pickup incursion fleet for fear of getting ganked.
Also, I'll mention again that the tears we get are so ******* delicious. In fact, I think we'll probably start recording them and releasing tear compilations. Maybe auto-tune it and make rap songs. Who knows. The game needs to hear more tears. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 22:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:
v0v Talk to carmelos53, since he made himself out to be a representative of BTL pub.
vOv, you can't go around trust everyone who say they are BTL representative . Carmelos53 is operator of The Ditanian Fleet (so the armor channel). If you ransom some of them it could help you earn some isk by the way. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Is that who that is? Hmm, I guess I laid blame on the wrong set of incursionbears.
Not that it'll effect the operations at all.
Good to know, though. |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Is that who that is? Hmm, I guess I laid blame on the wrong set of incursionbears.
Not that it'll effect the operations at all.
Good to know, though.
Hey man, don't let me stop you from having your fun. At least I was able to give you some correct information.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour.
So by your own admission a handful of dudes can reduce the overall productivity of incursions by about 5%. Imagine what will happen if we escalate this. If there's one thing the Skunkworks excels at, it's taking things WAY too far. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.28 23:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. So by your own admission a handful of dudes can reduce the overall productivity of incursions by about 5%. Imagine what will happen if we escalate this. If there's one thing the Skunkworks excels at, it's taking things WAY too far.
Quoted for truth. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 01:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. So by your own admission a handful of dudes can reduce the overall productivity of incursions by about 5%. Imagine what will happen if we escalate this. If there's one thing the Skunkworks excels at, it's taking things WAY too far.
I will applaud from the sideline if you manage to get this above 20 %. Such events can only be admired, sir. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Foxgguy2001
Band of Rebels Redneck Rage
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 01:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. So by your own admission a handful of dudes can reduce the overall productivity of incursions by about 5%. Imagine what will happen if we escalate this. If there's one thing the Skunkworks excels at, it's taking things WAY too far. Quoted for truth.
One cannot make an admission and have it cited as a verified statistic. Further, one cannot quote for emphasis and assert it substantiates truth.
/facepalm ...surrounded by idiots.
|

Euasked
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 01:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote: Then Skunkworks got a dec from God Squad. That was a bit of a head scratcher for us, as we had just started making friendly with them a bit over a mutual war against No Kings. We had a convo with God Squad and they claimed that a bunch of people from the BTL channel hired them to dec us.
As a representative from BTL pub I'd like to firmly point out that BTL operators, moderators or FC's generally in charge have not issued any war declarations on behalf of BTL Pub. Our simple goal is to provide incursions for everyone, everywhere at anytime. When you say "people from BTL" that means pilots who use our service (channel) that are non-affiliated with BTL pub. Your reasoning for a "war declaration" is therefore put on a wrong basis. Now let me rephrase your declaration of war into something we can all generally agree on. "Rich highsec pubbies hired mercs to wardec us and now we want payback." If there's anything else you might wonder about or any questions, feel free to drop me a mail.  PS: Saying highsec incursions is one of the best ISK features is a bit flawed. You do realise that highsec incursions only pay out 60 % of the reward that is paid out in nullsec and lowsec? Oh, and that the lowsec mothership site has a chance of dropping a revenant BPC that can be sold for 40 + b isk? I'd also like you to be aware of the ISK generated in incursions fuels a lot of wonderful PvP fights, because more people can afford to fly their t3's or t2 ships into lowsec without having to worry too much.  And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. You need to step your game up a bit more before we notice anything on our wallets. Maybe assaults and headquarter fleets? Aim big guys, aim for the stars.
So you simultaneously argue that incursions don't pay out that great and that losing your faction BS wont hurt your wallet? Nice one, you just made another new friend. See you soon bear.
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 02:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
Foxgguy2001 wrote:One cannot make an admission and have it cited as a verified statistic. Further, one cannot quote for emphasis and assert it substantiates truth.
/facepalm ...surrounded by idiots.
Someone takes forums far too seriously.
umadbro? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 02:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
Euasked wrote:
So you simultaneously argue that incursions don't pay out that great and that losing your faction BS wont hurt your wallet? Nice one, you just made another new friend. See you soon bear.
Huh? .... I don't think you quite understand my arguments. It's relative, nullsec incursions in comparison to highsec incursions are more lucrative. So highsec incursions don't pay out great in COMPARISON to nullsec incursions. It won't hurt my wallet *shrug*, it might hurt others. That's relative as well.
Don't twist my words and take them out of context, while this is crime and punishment I still believe everyone is capable of somewhat decent level of discussion of topics. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Foxgguy2001
Band of Rebels Redneck Rage
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 02:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Foxgguy2001 wrote:One cannot make an admission and have it cited as a verified statistic. Further, one cannot quote for emphasis and assert it substantiates truth.
/facepalm ...surrounded by idiots.
Someone takes forums far too seriously. umadbro?
You take my taking the forums too seriously, too seriously.
Umadbro?
**Edited for truth. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 02:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote: Then Skunkworks got a dec from God Squad. That was a bit of a head scratcher for us, as we had just started making friendly with them a bit over a mutual war against No Kings. We had a convo with God Squad and they claimed that a bunch of people from the BTL channel hired them to dec us.
As a representative from BTL pub I'd like to firmly point out that BTL operators, moderators or FC's generally in charge have not issued any war declarations on behalf of BTL Pub. Our simple goal is to provide incursions for everyone, everywhere at anytime. When you say "people from BTL" that means pilots who use our service (channel) that are non-affiliated with BTL pub. Your reasoning for a "war declaration" is therefore put on a wrong basis. Now let me rephrase your declaration of war into something we can all generally agree on. "Rich highsec pubbies hired mercs to wardec us and now we want payback." If there's anything else you might wonder about or any questions, feel free to drop me a mail.  PS: Saying highsec incursions is one of the best ISK features is a bit flawed. You do realise that highsec incursions only pay out 60 % of the reward that is paid out in nullsec and lowsec? Oh, and that the lowsec mothership site has a chance of dropping a revenant BPC that can be sold for 40 + b isk? I'd also like you to be aware of the ISK generated in incursions fuels a lot of wonderful PvP fights, because more people can afford to fly their t3's or t2 ships into lowsec without having to worry too much.  And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour.
As our diplomat, I have to say that whether or not our reasoning is flawed is irrelevant because we're more able to exercise power than BTL and thus we are right.
|
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 03:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote: As our diplomat, I have to say that whether or not our reasoning is flawed is irrelevant because we're more able to exercise power than BTL and thus we are right.
OK. GG. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
149
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 10:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote: Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence.
And you think you know beter, what people should do... go grow up.
|

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 12:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
To clear the air I never once said I was part of btl. Infact I've told skunkworks many times who I represent. Hec the wardec is even publically stated in our mote. Just because skunkworks has the intellect of lemiwinks from south park isn't my problem.
Now down to business, you aren't killing our pilots, you are killing pilots from incursion local. This isn't a personal dec. I chipped in 5mill total. All it took was a few mails and a 2 minute motd change before enough people donated. That's what happens off you grief in eve btw.
I really like the fact that you guys think you're awesome can flipping 6 m oth old new to eve players whom are defenseless in their logi and can't fire back. To make your case worse I hear everytime you dec decced you just Corp jump so your poor little ships don't die.
You're not pvperw you're carebears picking on noobies. Enjoy it while it lasts the decs won't stop until you guys grow some balls and fight for a week. That's what the community asked for and paid for. It stops when you stop. I told you I'm just an alt too Messenger and if I quit eve tomorrow your problems wouldn't stop.
So I ask you... How do you plan ransoming every single carebear that donates 1mil to dec a grieved. Good lucky with that. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 14:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:To clear the air I never once said I was part of btl. Infact I've told skunkworks many times who I represent. Hec the wardec is even publically stated in our motd. Just because skunkworks has the intellect of lemiwinks from south park isn't my problem.
"We had a convo with God Squad and they claimed that a bunch of people from the BTL channel hired them to dec us."
What you lack in reading comprehension, you make up for in keyboard pounding.
carmelos53 wrote:I really like the fact that you guys think you're so awesome because you can flip a 6 month old new to eve players whom are defenseless while you melt their logi. To make your case worse I hear everytime you guys get decced you just Corp jump so your poor little ships don't die.
The funny part is when you made it sound like we're concerned about losing ships. We corp hop to accomplish goals, and occasionally to avoid being swarmed by mercenaries who will only fight when they have more neutral logi than we have pilots (not referring to God Squad, who we happen to like). We're not in NPC corps to hide from GS, we're in NPC corps so that we are free to pursue our goals. Free lesson in warfare: fighting by proxy just reveals you as weak. We're demonstrating just how weak you are. If you want to fight us, come fight us. Don't hire others to do your dirty work so that you can continue making absurd amounts of isk risk-free.
Monk used part of something I wrote. Here's the rest:
"At the Skunkworks, we don't fight by proxy. We don't hire mercenaries to stand in for us. And when other people do so, we go around the mercs and take the fight to our true enemies. For this reason, The Skunkworks has declared an unoffical war on BTL Pub and incursions in general. What started as casual griefing to pass the time will become a full-time occupation until we tire of it. If you thought Slimy Worm was bad, now he's bringing friends."
Spin it how you want, but Incursion bears paid for a war with it. They're getting what they paid for.
carmelos53 wrote:Enjoy it while it lasts the decs won't stop until you guys grow some balls and fight for a week. That's what the community asked for and paid for. It stops when you stop.
It stops when the casual incursion runners gets so tired of our campaign that they beg all you self-righteous incursion bears to drop the dec against us because they can't get a fleet because everyone is so terrified of losing ships. |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 14:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
Lol impressive. You counter by spreading lies instead of sticking to the facts. #1 I told god squad incursion runners #2 god squad specifically states god squad no where in that sentence will you find me stating btl. #3 the only reason you are picking on btl is because you can't manage to get enough alts to influtrate the tdf channel #4 you are only killing people outside of our channel #5 we don't need to war dec with 50 corps when one will do and even if we did you still dropped Corp as yu have before #6 you dont fight to begin with period unless you are the aggressor. #7 we've had people claiming to be tough before and 4 months of decs normally stops it so fight or hide #8 you aren't in a position to offer terms and even if you happen to gain the upper hand we have never and will ever agree to your terms even if it's 1isk
Big mistake making this post public . Now everyone knows you guys can't defend yourselves. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 15:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Sufficient to say, some incursion bears got mad that we where helping the eve economy and highered mercs to "deal" with us. And like any good corp would do, we are rasing the stakes, regaurdless of who highered the mercs. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 17:12:00 -
[27] - Quote
Stop all the talking, get to action and start linking killboards and stuff. Everyone is just measuring e-peen in this thread right now.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 19:53:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Stop all the talking, get to action and start linking killboards and stuff. Everyone is just measuring e-peen in this thread right now. 
Last I heard it was against the rules to link killboards. Look me up on BC, I think I've been on the most kills (unless they got an early start today) |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 20:04:00 -
[29] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:#3 the only reason you are picking on btl is because you can't manage to get enough alts to influtrate the tdf channel. #4 you are only killing people outside of our channel
Challenge accepted.
carmelos53 wrote:#5 we don't need to war dec with 50 corps when one will do and even if we did you still dropped Corp as yu have before
Working As Intended (tm) 
carmelos53 wrote:#6 you dont fight to begin with period unless you are the aggressor.
...Big mistake making this post public . Now everyone knows you guys can't defend yourselves. The only time your pvp griefer Corp gets on kms is when they have no chance.
Do your homework better next time.
carmelos53 wrote:#7 we've had people claiming to be tough before and 4 months of decs normally stops it so fight or hide
We stop when we're bored, or you capitulate. We'll see which comes first.
carmelos53 wrote:Here are our terms: replace every single kill you have ever been been a part of and 10 monocles.
An excellent counter-offer. I'll gladly replace each ship with a suitable substitute, once I have prepared the proper claims form. At that point, each purported victim will need to complete the form and wait 2-3 weeks for us to process the paperwork and see to the ship replacement. And don't think I'm making this up, I'll have the form ready by tomorrow night barring unforeseen circumstances.
Unfortunately, I cannot accommodate your request for monocles. To date we have destroyed at least 27 ships, and supplying only 10 monocles would create an obvious distribution problem. I suspect those monocles would never reach anyone actually harmed by these events, and would instead remain with you and your cronies, denying compensation to the victims. I know how people like you work. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 20:07:00 -
[30] - Quote
http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=8
Campaign says 11b in two days. There's some choice kills in there. Nightmares and whatnot. |
|

DART MOUTHE
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 20:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
I endorse this product and/or service.  |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 21:29:00 -
[32] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=8
Campaign says 11b in two days. There's some choice kills in there. Nightmares and whatnot.
*acknowledges* Nice work, any possibility of getting videos? quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 22:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=8
Campaign says 11b in two days. There's some choice kills in there. Nightmares and whatnot. *acknowledges* Nice work, any possibility of getting videos? I need to get FRAPS registered and start recording. It's planned, yes. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
83
|
Posted - 2011.10.29 22:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=8
Campaign says 11b in two days. There's some choice kills in there. Nightmares and whatnot. *acknowledges* Nice work, any possibility of getting videos? I need to get FRAPS registered and start recording. It's planned, yes.
Cool, by the way. My alliance just got wardecced by some russian roleplayers claiming to be fighting for Sansha. I don't know whether to laugh or cry 
Time for some fun \o/ quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
76
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 09:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence.
Monetization of Incursions was a immersion breaker and took away from the effect of those live event incursions. I have seen incursions last for days while the Revanent sits there.
I would support an end to incursions of the end of respawning sites at the point of carrier appearance IF and only IF the Tech Moons are taken out as well.
Why should one kind of space have a mega-ISK pump and the other not?
But then who needs ISK anyway?
|

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
261
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 09:41:00 -
[36] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=8
Campaign says 11b in two days. There's some choice kills in there. Nightmares and whatnot. *acknowledges* Nice work, any possibility of getting videos? I need to get FRAPS registered and start recording. It's planned, yes.
Actually you can use the free version of fraps, it just has Fraps written at the top of the screen.
Other than that there's no difference. Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 12:25:00 -
[37] - Quote
I'm a gambling man. Care to put a wager on this?
Call it a channel test for security. If you can influtrate our channel and do it with me in fleet I will send monk 100m AND I will even eat my pride and offer you a war dec contract in a few months if you guys are still functional. If I catch you once all I'd like in return is an acknowledgement here. Now I keep my promises, contracts and wagers.
So what say you sir? |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cerisia wrote:Actually you can use the free version of fraps, it just has Fraps written at the top of the screen.
Other than that there's no difference.
Last time I used the free version, it limited clips to 30 seconds. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
209
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:I'm a gambling man. Care to put a wager on this?
Call it a channel test for security. If you can influtrate our channel and do it with me in fleet I will send monk 100m AND I will even eat my pride and offer you a war dec contract in a few months if you guys are still functional. If I catch you once all I'd like in return is an acknowledgement here. Now I keep my promises, contracts and wagers.
So what say you sir?
I say you'll probably be so incredibly cautious after making this bet that it'll cost you income that we can't account for, and that nothing will ever come of this bet because of that. But I'm willing to play along. As I understand it, the challenge is to get a ship in a fleet with you and transfer aggression before being called out. We'll let you know if/when that happens. |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:10:00 -
[40] - Quote
This is my Inc toon so I'll use this and drop the second box to make things fair. Btw to make sure this is done properly paying others in fleet off doesn't grant you a victory understood? |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:47:00 -
[41] - Quote
200 m and I'll be happy to give off aggro in carmelos' fleets  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

bloomeh
Ghost Militia BricK sQuAD.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 07:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
I know nothing of incursions, being a simple worm hole miner. I'm curious how you are able to gank them in high sec. If they are random fleets, not all in the same alliance, it seems like war decs won't work. What's the secret here? I may throw in my pvp alt to join in the fun!
\o |

Bilbo Bawbag
New Eden Robotics
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 10:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
Just out of interest, how does this form of greifing work? |

Mace Ormond
Corporate Catering
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 11:32:00 -
[44] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence.
An interesting point of view, and one that I see many of the C&P locals seem to approve of. I wonder how many people know how much of a dichotomy it is with what you guys really do.
It seems you boys want to build yourselves up a name as bad boy griefers, but of course are less forthcoming about all of being funded by high sec carebearing through your incursion and industry corporations.
Of course, to anyone interested in griefing these griefers, Corporate Catering has all the info on their alts, so drop me a mail.
Bon Appetite!
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Go Petition Blizzard
209
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 12:48:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mace Ormond wrote:[quote=Psychotic Monk]It seems you boys want to build yourselves up a name as bad boy griefers, but of course are less forthcoming about all of being funded by high sec carebearing through your incursion and industry corporations.
I have never in my life run an incursion, and I abandoned any pretense of industry a long time ago.
What money doesn't come from the wrecks of our targets, I get through wormhole exploration. That can pay about as well as highsec incursions, only you're operating in nullsec without a local channel list.
So much for your theories. |

Mace Ormond
Corporate Catering
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 13:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: I have never in my life run an incursion, and I abandoned any pretense of industry a long time ago.
What money doesn't come from the wrecks of our targets, I get through wormhole exploration. That can pay about as well as highsec incursions, only you're operating in nullsec without a local channel list.
So much for your theories.
This may be true. Your other character, Floppietheminingclown (love your originality by the way) could indeed be a wormhole explorer. It matters not. I'm talking about your wider corporation, not you in particular and I have no sympathy for your economic lamentations.
Your CEO does have these other carebear corporations I'm talking about, and that's not a theory. Ask him about the high sec POS he lost a few weeks ago. It's location was provided to certain parties courtesy of Corporate Catering.
Of course, it's just business at the end of the day and should you kids require a bespoke buffet of your own, I'll see what I can cook up. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 14:31:00 -
[47] - Quote
It would be foolish of us not to use all the tools available to us in the same way that we have neutral logi available even though I believe that neutral logi not getting aggression for repping people sucks as a mechanic.
Besides that, I'm not arguing for the elimination of incursions. Honestly, it's neat content. I mean the whole constellation slightly changes color and gets invaded by spike-covered zombies? That's cool. I am argueing that the isk-to-risk ratio needs to be changed.
Also, you're forgetting the other major reason we're doing what we're doing: We want to. Even if it didn't have these secondary effects that we are really pleased about we would probably still do it. |

Odemis
Go Petition Blizzard
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 14:45:00 -
[48] - Quote
I for one have petitioned Blizzard many times to have these heathens dealt with. It's clearly a broken game mechanic that allows these "Skunkworks" people to do what they do and Blizzard won't do a thing about it. I've searched the archives in Stormwind for some form inspiration on how to deal with these pests only to have the librarian quiet me down. I guess I get a bit animated when boats are violenced in high-sec.
|

Mace Ormond
Corporate Catering
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 15:05:00 -
[49] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:It would be foolish of us not to use all the tools available to us in the same way that we have neutral logi available even though I believe that neutral logi not getting aggression for repping people sucks as a mechanic.
Besides that, I'm not arguing for the elimination of incursions. Honestly, it's neat content. I mean the whole constellation slightly changes color and gets invaded by spike-covered zombies? That's cool. I am argueing that the isk-to-risk ratio needs to be changed.
Also, you're forgetting the other major reason we're doing what we're doing: We want to. Even if it didn't have these secondary effects that we are really pleased about we would probably still do it.
Ah, the one person from Skunkworks that I can count on for an answer that isnGÇÖt pretentious. And always gracious in defeat in game too.
However, I didnGÇÖt miss the reasons as to why, although what I was alluding to was that I had my reservations about the GÇÿnobilityGÇÖ of the cause. DonGÇÖt get me wrong, there are those in your corporation who I have respect for (two in particular for their PvP prowess and their achievements in griefing). I wonGÇÖt drop their names, as thatGÇÖs the kind of attention you want from making threads like this as well as why you write your blog, but a lot of the others seem content to hang onto their coattails for the sake of infamy.
For now, I wish you luck. I have found the actions of a certain person in your organisation amusing and for now I have been largely unaffected by it. Still, itGÇÖs the perfect platform for peddling the intel I have on you guys, so I thank you for that.
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 15:54:00 -
[50] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: edit: Here's my take on Incursions. They make as much isk as I did running wormholes, but in the safety of highsec. They are wrecking the value loyalty points, making the game harder for casual mission runners who don't have the time to chase incursions and put together fleets (no I don't do missions either) in what time they have to play. They are creating a steady stream of stuff going into the market without much being taken out, resulting in general inflation.
Incursions NEED to be more dangerous, because as they stand now they are just isk printers driving up the price of everything and hurting everyone who isn't being an incursion bear (except maybe the self-sufficient wormhole corps).
Your take is wrong. Now if you neither incursions or do missions, how in hell's name do you get a saying about how these 2 things affect each other? If you respond to me claiming "oh how in the sacred moose's name can I know that you are wrong?" I swear to the gods that I will make you read every single word of that 9 page thread that is running in the missioning subforum about "incursions inflating LP prices" . quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

Friendly Gank
Unilateral Inaction
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 16:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
always seems odd to me that griefers are just about the most risk averse people you can find. this might actually be worth a thread if they went after some of the more serious incursions bears like sk33t or SSN |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Go Petition Blizzard
209
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 16:49:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mace Ormond wrote:This may be true. Your other character, Floppietheminingclown (love your originality by the way) could indeed be a wormhole explorer.
Nope. His name should tell you what I made that account for. The role has evolved quite a bit since then, but I have no problem stating that that character remains purely a support role. If I had wanted to hide him, I'd have named him something less obvious. No, if you look back at my history of posts in the forums and my killboard losses before joining the skunkworks, it should be obvious that I do my excursions with my main (this one).
Mace Ormond wrote:Your CEO does have these other carebear corporations I'm talking about, and that's not a theory. Ask him about the high sec POS he lost a few weeks ago. It's location was provided to certain parties courtesy of Corporate Catering.
Of course, it's just business at the end of the day and should you kids require a bespoke buffet of your own, I'll see what I can cook up.
I'm well aware of what Monk and some of the others have been up to, and to what ends. You, however, can only guess and feign insight. |

Mace Ormond
Corporate Catering
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 16:59:00 -
[53] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Mace Ormond wrote:This may be true. Your other character, Floppietheminingclown (love your originality by the way) could indeed be a wormhole explorer. Nope. His name should tell you what I made that account for. The role has evolved quite a bit since then, but I have no problem stating that that character remains purely a support role. If I had wanted to hide him, I'd have named him something less obvious. No, if you look back at my history of posts in the forums and my killboard losses before joining the skunkworks, it should be obvious that I do my excursions with my main (this one). Mace Ormond wrote:Your CEO does have these other carebear corporations I'm talking about, and that's not a theory. Ask him about the high sec POS he lost a few weeks ago. It's location was provided to certain parties courtesy of Corporate Catering.
Of course, it's just business at the end of the day and should you kids require a bespoke buffet of your own, I'll see what I can cook up. I'm well aware of what Monk and some of the others have been up to, and to what ends. You, however, can only guess and feign insight.
Irony seems to be lost on you. A shame, but not a great one.
But I feign nothing. I delivered "Ponyville" to your war targets. I know he has more towers and wont pull them down because he doesn't have the standings to put them back up in again. If that's a guess, you have to admit it's a good one. |

Odemis
Go Petition Blizzard
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 17:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
If only there were some kind of tactic to avoid losing a POS in high-sec.... CCP should free up restrictions on alliance hopping to avoid unwanted war declarations and structure violencing. Oh wait, they did! |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 18:12:00 -
[55] - Quote
We've got several people now who have sworn the eternal destruction of the Skunkworks, and make it a point to know what we're up to as thoroughly as possible. Far be it for me to denounce getting thorough intel, being as it's one of the tools we used to best effect when we're at war, but I do have a bit of a giggle picturing these dudes making big charts with our pictures on them and gathering search results and telling their precious how they'll get revenge. :D
On an other note, we broke 30 billion isk destroyed in this campaign last night and also have a delicious story to tell about a kill we got. I won't bother copy-pasting, since this is a great opportunity to be an attention ***** and link my blog.
Here, have a link. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 21:48:00 -
[56] - Quote
Of course some of us are just hard core Shansha roleplayers and think that the incersion bears have been pushing back our invasion of high sec for to long! |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Go Petition Blizzard
210
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 22:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
My favorite was the 'Geddon Navy that got himself Concorded by shooting the one ship in our fleet that didn't have aggression on him. |

Sola Mercury
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 10:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: They are creating a steady stream of stuff going into the market without much being taken out, resulting in general inflation.
.
Mind to elaborate, what seems to me, is a solid proof of your cluelessnes? You know, "a steady stream of stuff going into the market" lowers inflation.
|

Dek'athor
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 12:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
Sola Mercury wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: They are creating a steady stream of stuff going into the market without much being taken out, resulting in general inflation.
.
Mind to elaborate, what seems to me, is a solid proof of your cluelessnes? You know, "a steady stream of stuff going into the market" lowers inflation.
He means a 'steady stream of isk'. Altho, tbh, I'd put the recent prices increase (i.e. plex) on the looming winter expansion, before them good expansions apparently all the prices go up |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 14:07:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ammzi wrote: PS: Saying highsec incursions is one of the best ISK features is a bit flawed. You do realise that highsec incursions only pay out 60 % of the reward that is paid out in nullsec and lowsec?
And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. You need to step your game up a bit more before we notice anything on our wallets.
quoting you saying that highsec incursions dont make much ISK followed by you saying high sec incursions make 30 - 40 billion ISK AN HOUR.
|
|

Barakkus
987
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 14:36:00 -
[61] - Quote
Friendly Gank wrote:always seems odd to me that griefers are just about the most risk averse people you can find. this might actually be worth a thread if they went after some of the more serious incursions bears like sk33t or SSN
SSN aren't bears bro. I know nothing about sk33t. http://youtu.be/5CSxjFRmzkU ...unfotrunately, Saturday was reeeaaaallly slow... Day before that we took down a carrier 
We just like to get money to go pvp with. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 15:28:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rellik B00n wrote:Ammzi wrote: PS: Saying highsec incursions is one of the best ISK features is a bit flawed. You do realise that highsec incursions only pay out 60 % of the reward that is paid out in nullsec and lowsec?
And a last thing, about 30-40 billion isk is being generated in highsec incursions at best peak times during the week an hour. You need to step your game up a bit more before we notice anything on our wallets.
quoting you saying that highsec incursions dont make much ISK followed by you saying high sec incursions make 30 - 40 billion ISK AN HOUR.
People like you wanna make me rip my hair chest out and scream STUPID STUPID STUPID SO INCREDIBLY DUMB AND IDIOTICALLY STUPID WITH NO UNDERSTANDING OF LOGIC WHAT SO EVER.
Now you listen to me, you less-intelligent-I-have-no-idea-how-you-survive being. Highsec incursions in comparison to nullsec/lowsec incursions will earn you a lot less isk. So highsec incursions are LESS profitable than nullsec/lowsec incursions (do you get it now?). So yes, my incredibly illogical friend, highsec incursions don't make much isk IN ******* COMPARISON TO NULLSEC AND LOWSEC INCURSIONS LIKE I WROTE IN MY POST.
Highsec incursions in general generate 30-40 billion isk an hour, an estimate that I calculated depending on different variables (not per person, but in total for a hypothetical 3 highsec incursion scenario).
In your quote you imply that my statement is illogical. It is not and I should not be to blame for your brain's inability to understand arguments.
PS: If you simply misread or misunderstood the post, fine ... I'll say sorry for the above rant ^ on your person. But seriously, don't even attempt to discuss with people if you really fail at that or at least ask me to elaborate. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 17:34:00 -
[63] - Quote
U mad bro?
but seriously, incursions pay out to well not just in isk but in LP as well, the main problem in it is that as long as you dotn kill the mother ship you can keep getting the sites to spawn over and over, there should be a cap on how many sites can spawn for each incursion till you 'have' to kill the mother ship and end the incursion.
Joining Sansha isent so bad, you get great health care. |

Psychotic Monk
Go Petition Blizzard
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ammzi, my complaint against them isn't as much the isk they make, but the isk they make compared to the risk to the pilot/ship. Until we came along, that is. :P
Although that's really a discussion best had in one of the other sub-forums.
Speaking of money, we hit just a hair short of 40b killed last night. I was originally gunning for 60b killed in a week, but I think we're going to well exceed that. I wish there was an emoticon that let me properly express my feelings about that. Is there an overjoyed emoticon? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 18:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
but seriously, incursions pay out to well not just in isk but in LP as well, the main problem in it is that as long as you dotn kill the mother ship you can keep getting the sites to spawn over and over, there should be a cap on how many sites can spawn for each incursion till you 'have' to kill the mother ship and end the incursion.
U jelly bro?
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
Joining Sansha isent so bad, you get great health care.
No **** ... I have sansha loyalists screaming all over space "THERE IS NO DEATH IN NATION!!!111" Delusional fools  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 19:26:00 -
[66] - Quote
Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. |

Barakkus
1000
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away.
How much rope did they have? |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:49:00 -
[68] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have?
Well they wernt Spelunkers so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? |

Barakkus
1001
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate?
The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word  |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:55:00 -
[70] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word 
Ah sorry I knew my terible spelling skills would come back to bite me, i saw it was misspelled later but didnt want to edit for one word. Well played good sir |
|

Barakkus
1001
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 21:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
lol, I'm just in the mood to nit-pick. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
229
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 22:50:00 -
[72] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:lol, I'm just in the mood to nit-pick. Gaz will keep you quite busy. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 23:38:00 -
[73] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word 
Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com.
Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick...
~Andrei. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Andrei, are you defending Gaz's posting, really? |

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
274
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 00:40:00 -
[75] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Barakkus wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Of course we ransom most the incursioners we catch, but very few actualy pay us to let them go, a few have payed tho and they have been allowed to warp away. How much rope did they have? Well they wernt Spelunkers  so not sure why they would have brought rope, care to elaborate? The only use for "payed" is in regards to rope, and it's a very obscure usage of the word  Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com. Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick... ~Andrei.
Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood....
American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years.
The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means
verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladle
Carry on hehe Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 01:02:00 -
[76] - Quote
Cerisia wrote:Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood.... American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years. The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladleCarry on hehe 
This is a much stronger argumentative stance than that of Barakkus, and as far as I can tell the only use of payed that isn't an irregular verb; however, it's irksome to see people on the internet arguing points that cannot stand on their own feet. Using an irregular form of a verb is not the same as misspelling that verb. If you want to play grammar/spelling **** (fan of WW2 Germany, for the filter), at least read a book first.
To close my case, I will simply side with Henry Fielding:
"In reality, the world have payed too great a compliment to critics, and have imagined them men of much greater profundity than they really are."
If you don't like Gaz's use of payed, or my defense of it, take it up with the great English novelist... Oh, and don't be so quick to blame the Americans, eh?
~Andrei. |

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
274
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 01:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Cerisia wrote:Whilst we're all in a nitpicking mood.... American Heritage Dictionary,Merriam Webster,and Dictionary.com are all American websites. The Americans (bless them) have butchered our great language for hundreds of years. The Oxford English dictionary however, states that payed means verb (past and past participle payed)
[with object] Nautical]
seal (the deck or seams of a wooden ship) with pitch or tar to prevent leakage:an open groove between the planks had to be payed by running in hot pitch from a special ladleCarry on hehe  This is a much stronger argumentative stance than that of Barakkus, and as far as I can tell the only use of payed that isn't an irregular verb; however, it's irksome to see people on the internet arguing points that cannot stand on their own feet. Using an irregular form of a verb is not the same as misspelling that verb. If you want to play grammar/spelling **** (fan of WW2 Germany, for the filter), at least read a book first. To close my case, I will simply side with Henry Fielding: "In reality, the world have payed too great a compliment to critics, and have imagined them men of much greater profundity than they really are." If you don't like Gaz's use of payed, or my defense of it, take it up with the great English novelist... Oh, and don't be so quick to blame the Americans, eh? ~Andrei.
Blimey!
Calm down dear, I was only having a laugh.... Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

Aggressive Nutmeg
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:04:00 -
[78] - Quote
Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling.
I think I'll stick to speaking English.
The word is 'paid'.  |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
264
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:24:00 -
[79] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
I blame a Dilbert cartoon from about 10-15 years ago that used "payed" instead of "paid" in one of the panels.
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 02:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
I'm gonna go ahead and call this one a flat out troll.
The word is 'misspell.' (Also, the period goes inside the quotes.) Additionally, I presented a great Eton educated chap who made use of this 'correct variant spelling' long before any of these fellows came along.
I guess that means I did let you troll me, though, so good on that.
Seriously though, why has our glorious grief thread become the place for people to illustrate their inability to criticize a perfectly acceptable usage of English language? Back to the Incursion griefing, and that's where I'll be...
~Andrei. |
|

SOLMEN
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 03:26:00 -
[81] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'. 
What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
121
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 03:29:00 -
[82] - Quote
SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. well iceland is closer to england than to the usa so there  |

Aggressive Nutmeg
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 05:35:00 -
[83] - Quote
SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be.
That would be 'bastardised' and 'Americanised'. 
The English language has evolved and changed over time. No prizes there. What annoys me is when a language evolves from sheer ignorance and laziness. Thanks America!
Good luck with your English subdialect. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 06:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
Back on topic!
We hit 49.93B destroyed tonight, before the incursion channels became ghost towns:
n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:32 ] Mari Sinn > is nobody else on? n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:42 ] Rushkow > I am. n++[ 2011.11.03 05:53:51 ] Rushkow > But I don't think there's much incursion going on right now n++[ 2011.11.03 05:55:24 ] Mari Sinn > dang this channel is usually very active during an incursion n++[ 2011.11.03 05:59:24 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > yeah I wonder what happened to it. n++[ 2011.11.03 06:00:40 ] Mari Sinn > maybe it's just to late n++[ 2011.11.03 06:00:47 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > That could be it. n++[ 2011.11.03 06:03:27 ] Mari Sinn > well there's always tomorrow fly safe n++[ 2011.11.03 06:03:55 ] FloppieTheBanjoClown > Right.
Yup, there's always tomorrow...
KB can be found here.
Fly safe guys! 
~Andrei.
[ninja edit for KB link, I think it might be against the forum rules--although not in the rules so far as I glanced over them.] |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 07:30:00 -
[85] - Quote
Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:SOLMEN wrote:Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:Apparently, if enough Americans mis-spell a word, it becomes a correct variant spelling. I think I'll stick to speaking English. The word is 'paid'.  What is funny is that you think that your "English" language is some set language. It is actually a bastardized version of old Germanic languages. So to say that your "English" spelling is correct when your "English" language has been just as bastardized as the Americanized dialect, is about as hypocritical as you can be. That would be 'bastardised' and 'Americanised'.  The English language has evolved and changed over time. No prizes there. What annoys me is when a language evolves from sheer ignorance and laziness. Thanks America! Good luck with your English subdialect.
That's what happens when one evolves. Things change. Sometimes for the better. How's that silly c*nt ruling your country? Still working for ya? |

Barakkus
1004
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 13:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:
Interestingly enough, and in Gaz's defense, "payed" seems to be a completely acceptable (although far less common) version of the past tense for pay, according to American Heritage Dictionary, Merriam Webster, and Dictionary.com.
Perhaps you should better choose which nits you pick...
~Andrei.
It amazes me how ignorance perverts the English language. As far back as I can remember it was never used for a representation of "payment". I guess the more people misspell words or misuse them they get added with their perversions to the "dictionary". I was dumbfounded when they added ain't to the dictionary 10 or 15 years ago. What the hell is ain't a contraction of? There certainly isn't a word "ai" unless you are discussing artificial intelligence, artificial insemination or some weird sloth from South America. I'm not sure how any of those could be contracted and/or be used in reference to what "ain't" is supposed to mean.
...and no, "languages evolve" is not a valid defense for not using proper grammar and spelling imo... It's a cop-out. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:09:00 -
[87] - Quote
Yeah Btl pub was really quiet aswell lastnight :( shame, I guess all the incersioners isk presses broke down.
Oh and as far as im concerned the internet (and texting) has created it own language, like lol. Its all about using terible gramer and spelling which was widly adopted world wide, fancy that.
So if everyone promises to stop using text speak, we can all go back to using high english on the marrow good sir. |

Barakkus
1004
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:40:00 -
[88] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Yeah Btl pub was really quiet aswell lastnight :( shame, I guess all the incersioners isk presses broke down.
Oh and as far as im concerned the internet (and texting) has created it own language, like lol. Its all about using terible gramer and spelling which was widly adopted world wide, fancy that.
So if everyone promises to stop using text speak, we can all go back to using high english on the marrow good sir.
Touch+¬  |

Odemis
The Skunkworks
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 16:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss |

Barakkus
1005
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 16:59:00 -
[90] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss
Getting back on topic now; at one point we (Skunks) had complete control over the local incursion channel for the better part of 2 hours. Both BTL and TDF channels seemed confined to non fleet-forming chatter as well. Mostly people just talked about different strategies and fittings for their favorite shiny faction BS or t3. This could mean several things: We've frightened enough incursionbears into not pursuing their favorite past time, it was just an off night, or maybe they are hanging out in the opposite high-sec incursion. Personally I think that public fleets aren't being formed as often.
It's usually like that in BTL with a spattering of **** fit / **** ships linked xing up. Mostly people just trolling each other or conversing then a rash of xing up then more trolling and chatter. |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
93
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:32:00 -
[91] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss
Getting back on topic now; at one point we (Skunks) had complete control over the local incursion channel for the better part of 2 hours. Both BTL and TDF channels seemed confined to non fleet-forming chatter as well. Mostly people just talked about different strategies and fittings for their favorite shiny faction BS or t3. This could mean several things: We've frightened enough incursionbears into not pursuing their favorite past time, it was just an off night, or maybe they are hanging out in the opposite high-sec incursion. Personally I think that public fleets aren't being formed as often.
My dear griefers, you haven't achieved anything. Keep dreaming  You have to work a bit harder  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
261
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:44:00 -
[92] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Odemis wrote:Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss
Getting back on topic now; at one point we (Skunks) had complete control over the local incursion channel for the better part of 2 hours. Both BTL and TDF channels seemed confined to non fleet-forming chatter as well. Mostly people just talked about different strategies and fittings for their favorite shiny faction BS or t3. This could mean several things: We've frightened enough incursionbears into not pursuing their favorite past time, it was just an off night, or maybe they are hanging out in the opposite high-sec incursion. Personally I think that public fleets aren't being formed as often. My dear griefers, you haven't achieved anything. Keep dreaming  You have to work a bit harder 
There have been measurably fewer people in the Vanguard systems the past couple of weeks and your beloved channels are pretty much endless QQ about CCP not "fixing" the griefing.
That's an achievement. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
93
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 20:05:00 -
[93] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Ammzi wrote:Odemis wrote:Gazmin actually constructs proper sentences in corp chat. I give him 8/10 for garnering so many negative responses to his use of the English language. *discuss
Getting back on topic now; at one point we (Skunks) had complete control over the local incursion channel for the better part of 2 hours. Both BTL and TDF channels seemed confined to non fleet-forming chatter as well. Mostly people just talked about different strategies and fittings for their favorite shiny faction BS or t3. This could mean several things: We've frightened enough incursionbears into not pursuing their favorite past time, it was just an off night, or maybe they are hanging out in the opposite high-sec incursion. Personally I think that public fleets aren't being formed as often. My dear griefers, you haven't achieved anything. Keep dreaming  You have to work a bit harder  There have been measurably fewer people in the Vanguard systems the past couple of weeks and your beloved channels are pretty much endless QQ about CCP not "fixing" the griefing. That's an achievement.
Hey, everything better for me. More space in the crowded vanguards systems to do sites! *looks around*, I don't see any QQ, what is this QQ you are talking about? And do please define "your beloved channels". There's dozens and dozens of incursion channels and they can't all be mine, my good sir.
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 22:11:00 -
[94] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:My dear griefers, you haven't achieved anything. Keep dreaming  You have to work a bit harder 
Ammzi wrote: Hey, everything better for me. More space in the crowded vanguards systems to do sites!
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 22:17:00 -
[95] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Ammzi wrote:My dear griefers, you haven't achieved anything. Keep dreaming  You have to work a bit harder  Ammzi wrote: Hey, everything better for me. More space in the crowded vanguards systems to do sites!
No sense of community with you incursion bears. tsk tsk |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:30:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ladies and gentlemensk,
Skunkworks, a mere six days after incursions declared war on us, have reached our goal of 60 Billion worth of incursion bear ships killed! It's been a wild ride so far, with people expressing both incredible hate and the heartiest congrats. Due to this we've met like-minded players that we never would have had a chance to chill with otherwise.
The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills, the kills were often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter.
Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us.
The kills themselves have been great, too. Sometimes they were like an assembly line. Incursion bears go out one end and come in the other. Often two or even three at a time. Other times, we've had to milk the kills out gently, like some kind of extremely delicate japanese art. Often, we would directly instruct them to do things that didn't make the slightest bit of sense, except that it ushered them to their doom.
Here are some of my favourite killmails from the campaign so far:
http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=582 This dude dropped a gun in order to fit an energy transfer. Except he didn't have the skills, so he went and bought the book and trained it. We killed several other things with him in fleet while he was doing that.
This Rattlesnake watched us kill a dude and when we 'regrouped' at shortly after he repped me and got himself killed.
We have also gotten some extremely choice tears. Let me show you some of the shorter but more delicious snippets:
Inspironous > either way your a ****** and suck at life
SOLE Fide > well then they have exploted the game beyond all reason... and it will crash on them :)
Lord Wickham > what should be happeneing is btl should be putting a grief fleet up for the griefers Lord Wickham > kill their basi a few times and they will soon stop
Valichaos > whatever Valichaos > go **** yourself you dumb **** sucker
Dame TTUSOONI > yeah Dame TTUSOONI > **** you Dame TTUSOONI > you and your freinds will pay for this Dame TTUSOONI > sooner or later Psychotic Monk > Oh yeah? What are you going to do? Dame TTUSOONI > you don't have to care about that
Christopher Williams > **** you faggity
Thanks very much, incursion bears. And thanks for the money to buy some of those shiny ships we see you guys running around in. They're nice. I hope this only gets better from here. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
34
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:33:00 -
[97] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Ladies and gentlemensk, Skunkworks, a mere six days after incursions declared war on us, have reached our goal of 60 Billion worth of incursion bear ships killed! It's been a wild ride so far, with people expressing both incredible hate and the heartiest congrats. Due to this we've met like-minded player that we never would have had a chance to chill with otherwise. The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills , often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter. Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us. The kills themselves have been great, too. Sometimes they were like an assembly line. Incursion bears go out one end and come in the other. Often two or even three at a time. Other times, we've had to milk the kills out gently, like some kind of extremely delicate japanese art. Often, we would directly instruct them to do things that didn't make the slightest bit of sense, except that it ushered them to their doom. Here are some of my favourite killmails from the campaign so far: http://www.forscience.co/KB/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=582 This dude dropped a gun in order to fit an energy transfer. Except he didn't have the skills, so he went and bought the book and trained it. We killed several other things with him in fleet while he was doing that. This Rattlesnake watched us kill a dude and when we 'regrouped' at shortly after he repped me and got himself killed. We have also gotten some extremely choice tears. Let me show you some of the shorter but more delicious snippets: Inspironous > either way your a ****** and suck at life SOLE Fide > well then they have exploted the game beyond all reason... and it will crash on them :) Lord Wickham > what should be happeneing is btl should be putting a grief fleet up for the griefers Lord Wickham > kill their basi a few times and they will soon stop Valichaos > whatever Valichaos > go **** yourself you dumb **** sucker Dame TTUSOONI > yeah Dame TTUSOONI > **** you Dame TTUSOONI > you and your freinds will pay for this Dame TTUSOONI > sooner or later Psychotic Monk > Oh yeah? What are you going to do? Dame TTUSOONI > you don't have to care about that Christopher Williams > **** you faggity Thanks very much, incursion bears. And thanks for the money to buy some of those shiny ships we see you guys running around in. They're nice. I hope this only gets better from here.
It won't stop they retract the dec, reimburse us for our time, and give us a medal
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:36:00 -
[98] - Quote
Im going to let you finish, but Skunk Works is the best incersion griefers of all time! of all time! Horray! |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
240
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 03:53:00 -
[99] - Quote
Haha, I remember DAME, that was a fun kill. Profitable too, iirc.
Yes, guys, we remember most of you by name. We've topped 100 kills now, yet we're able to recall most of them and avoid dropping them the same bait twice.
See you in the incursion channel. |

rareden
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 07:46:00 -
[100] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:
Dame TTUSOONI > yeah Dame TTUSOONI > **** you Dame TTUSOONI > you and your freinds will pay for this Dame TTUSOONI > sooner or later Psychotic Monk > Oh yeah? What are you going to do? Dame TTUSOONI > you don't have to care about that
LOL!!!! YES!! i have to thank skunk for this they've made so many scrubby merc alliances dec us aswell and in turn given me so many delicious kill mails and some of them have even blown my mind on how bad some of the fits are, congrats for one person on duel tanking a curse with HAMS and cap rechargers |
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
661
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 09:07:00 -
[101] - Quote
Incursion runners are horrible people (not quite as bad as roleplayers but close). Thank you for hassling them. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
97
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 11:40:00 -
[102] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:
The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills, the kills were often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter.
Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us.
Lol, talk about propaganda and biased stories. Your silver tongue makes me wanna puke Psychotic, you've gotta do better than that. Your measly 60 billion isk in kills over the course of 6 days is re-generated in 2-3 hours in incursions.
The only thing you are managing to do is bounding incursion runners together and reinforcing their hatred and suspicion against petty griefers. How does it feel? That no matter what you do it is easily redone and the footprint you've put in the sand is quickly erased by the wind. You are nothing and you shall remain nothing, but a bug squashed beneath our feet. I laugh at you sir and I pity you. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Dek'athor
Hedion University Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 13:02:00 -
[103] - Quote
Ummm
Honest question guise, where are these guise when I'm bearing it out in incursions for 4-5 hrs daily ? If I didn't happen to read the forums I'd have never known any of it
Nothin in BTL except some Motd about some war, nothing in the 'other' (invite-only) shield incursion channel me and oooh, 150+ or so people frequent.
Where the heck are the incursion gankers and why aren't they more active ... ?
Don't tell me they 'stalk' local and the CCP incursion channels ... hahahahahahahahaha if that's the case. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 15:19:00 -
[104] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:
The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills, the kills were often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter.
Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us.
Lol, talk about propaganda and biased stories. Your silver tongue makes me wanna puke Psychotic, you've gotta do better than that. Your measly 60 billion isk in kills over the course of 6 days is re-generated in 2-3 hours in incursions. The only thing you are managing to do is bounding incursion runners together and reinforcing their hatred and suspicion against petty griefers. How does it feel? That no matter what you do it is easily redone and the footprint you've put in the sand is quickly erased by the wind. You are nothing and you shall remain nothing, but a bug squashed beneath our feet. I laugh at you sir and I pity you.
So your saying your making enough isk to build a giant space conveyer belt, and enough isk to keep placing faction fit BS on it, and it will keep dumping these said ships onto our kill board? ... well then carry on good sir |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
92
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 15:30:00 -
[105] - Quote
Ships easily gained are not roughly lost.
If it takes a month to save up for some kind of fancy ship, and it gets popped, that's hard.
If it takes a few hours of "work" to replace it, that's easy. So the end product is what? Either some ISK or a ship in a hangar, or a killboard entry. Does that change the game for anybody? Griefers will grief, incursion runners will run incursions. I don't suppose the ISK will pay the rent, nor will the killmails be included on a resume.
It's like the Special Olympics.
Both sides in this issue are riding the same short bus home, regardless of which one wins.
|

Vanessa Hotkiss
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 18:42:00 -
[106] - Quote
killz ze sansha |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 20:31:00 -
[107] - Quote
Just want to add my 10 cents here.
You still only killed 2 armor pilots in our channel so keep talking.. U might one day actually believed what you are saying.
Hope you like the pos we killed from your alt Corp. Also when we break even for the 212 mil remaining yes the decs might drop if we feel like it but people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen.
Anyways enjoy killing people in incursion local and "pvping" 1vs10 because can flips seems to be the only thing you guys do well.
Still have that 200mil pride bet going on. Only Two more days until it's over.
Best of luck. Enjoy high sec you will be there for awhile. Bye :) |

PlayerName
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:44:00 -
[108] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote: Hope you like the pos we killed from your alt Corp. Also when we break even for the 212 mil remaining yes the decs might drop if we feel like it but people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen.
I was unaware of a POS loss. I know you reinforced 2 of our towers, but no towers have been lost as of yet.
Also, slice it however you'd like, the point is we've still killed 60+ billion (and climbing) in incursionbears. It's true that most of our kills have been shield oriented and from BTL, but TDF will get it's turn soon enough. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
34
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:58:00 -
[109] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:Just want to add my 10 cents here.
You still only killed 2 armor pilots in our channel so keep talking.. U might one day actually believed what you are saying.
Hope you like the pos we killed from your alt Corp. Also when we break even for the 212 mil remaining yes the decs might drop if we feel like it but people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen.
Anyways enjoy killing people in incursion local and "pvping" 1vs10 because can flips seems to be the only thing you guys do well.
Still have that 200mil pride bet going on. Only Two more days until it's over.
Best of luck. Enjoy high sec you will be there for awhile. Bye :)
wait we decced the wrong incursion channel? i thought you were a BTLbear!?!?
EDIT: Did you REALLY go through every single kill just to see which ones were armor incursioners? |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 22:31:00 -
[110] - Quote
PlayerName wrote:carmelos53 wrote: Hope you like the pos we killed from your alt Corp. Also when we break even for the 212 mil remaining yes the decs might drop if we feel like it but people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen.
I was unaware of a POS loss. I know you reinforced 2 of our towers, but no towers have been lost as of yet. Also, slice it however you'd like, the point is we've still killed 60+ billion (and climbing) in incursionbears. It's true that most of our kills have been shield oriented and from BTL, but TDF will get it's turn soon enough.
No, he got the POS we use to sometimes build a thing in when nobody else is online. Twenty odd-dudes spent an entire day shooting at the POS that we just threw a bunch of hardeners on and didn't even care enough to defend. And also the offline one the next moon over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLezXLuvNgc
And then, when we scraped the dec off, someone spent a bunch of hours shooting a reinforced tower in order to keep agression on it.
I know you're probably distraught, Player. I know I am. Both of my Artbirator BPOs and six data cores were in there. And I'll have to spend another 20m to buy a corp with standings next time I want to fiddle around with industrial stuff. That's, like, two Republic Fleet Gyros that these guys keep leaving in their wrecks.
I will try to be gracious in defeat, though. Congrats, Ammzi, on crushing the half a pot plant we had in the little flower box on the back deck of the Skunkworks club house. |
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:03:00 -
[111] - Quote
Not to pee in your cheerios but no one cares much about the armor channel or its ships. Everyone knows that shield fleets are better, faster, fit shinyer stuff, and most ships that could fit armor like megas and Apocs are shield fit anyway.
but yeah we will get to you lol |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
Lol, talk about propaganda and biased stories. Your silver tongue makes me wanna puke Psychotic, you've gotta do better than that. Your measly 60 billion isk in kills over the course of 6 days is re-generated in 2-3 hours in incursions.
The only thing you are managing to do is bounding incursion runners together and reinforcing their hatred and suspicion against petty griefers. How does it feel? That no matter what you do it is easily redone and the footprint you've put in the sand is quickly erased by the wind. You are nothing and you shall remain nothing, but a bug squashed beneath our feet. I laugh at you sir and I pity you.
I'm not usually one to fall back on a meme for a retort, but in this care it's stimply the best option. Look at how mad this guy is. It's like he's a cartoon who's head has become a tea pot, all red-faced and bug-eyed and with steam pouring out of his ears. I'm seriously concerned for his heart. The fact is, if he really felt that we were nothing, he wouldn't have spent 36 or more hours shooting the only thing he could reach, which is the hobby-horse POS mentioned above.
Dek'athor wrote:Ummm
Honest question guise, where are these guise when I'm bearing it out in incursions for 4-5 hrs daily ? If I didn't happen to read the forums I'd have never known any of it
Nothin in BTL except some Motd about some war, nothing in the 'other' (invite-only) shield incursion channel me and oooh, 150+ or so people frequent.
Where the heck are the incursion gankers and why aren't they more active ... ?
This guy totally has a point. The excuse I'll have to point to is our chilling inability to fill a second squad. We'll be contacting some like-minded organizations shortly so we can grab one or two of their guys and we can show them all we've learned about killing incursion bears and they can take that knowledge back to their people and spread it. Hopefully that should help some of the proliferation problems we're having. Dek, I promise that I will try to make sure that more violence gets visted upon more boats.
As for the invite-only channels: good. Fine. I'm totally cool with the fact that they've found the right hoop to jump through to make their incursioning safer. That doesn't mean we won't get them, too, but it does mean that they've had to put more effort into what they're doing. You'll recall that my arguement against incursions isn't that it pays too well. Plenty of things pay as well as incursions do. The difference is that those other things require much more effort and have much more risk. If we've caused incursion bears to have to try and stay one step ahead of us to not get ganked, then my mission in that respect is accomplished.
Also, I'd like to state once more for the record that this is shitloads of fun. We're really enjoying ourselves.
|

rareden
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:31:00 -
[113] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:Just want to add my 10 cents here.
You still only killed 2 armor pilots in our channel so keep talking.. U might one day actually believed what you are saying.
Hope you like the pos we killed from your alt Corp. Also when we break even for the 212 mil remaining yes the decs might drop if we feel like it but people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen.
Anyways enjoy killing people in incursion local and "pvping" 1vs10 because can flips seems to be the only thing you guys do well.
Still have that 200mil pride bet going on. Only Two more days until it's over.
Best of luck. Enjoy high sec you will be there for awhile. Bye :)
lols burning spear, so your smacking the people who just got 60bill of carebear ships, so let me link a couple of your loss mails just to see how bad your ship fits are http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=67 eh hurm....... just... why.. your best pilot and he flys that.... http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=80
so my reply to you, bring on the wars scrubs, who actually cares about a pos why would you spend 10hrs shooting a pos..... |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:44:00 -
[114] - Quote
LOL not aware of a pos kill? 1 offline pos was killed and we just finished off the active large. An eye for an eye. thanks champs. Nice try with the alliance hoping to invalidate the wars too. Unfortunately there are ways around it.
Not really wanting to play the tough guy card here but now we are even. Have fun killing randomy pilots who can't defend themselves. The pos kills definately cover our 2 loses.
No hard feelings. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:48:00 -
[115] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:LOL not aware of a pos kill? 1 offline pos was killed and we just finished off the active large. An eye for an eye. thanks champs. Nice try with the alliance hoping to invalidate the wars too. Unfortunately there are ways around it.
Not really wanting to play the tough guy card here but now we are even. Have fun killing randomy pilots who can't defend themselves. The pos kills definately cover our 2 loses.
No hard feelings.
Cool. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:50:00 -
[116] - Quote
rareden wrote:http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=80
If it's a PVP fit, it sucks. If it's a sleeper PVE fit, it also sucks. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
262
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:54:00 -
[117] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:
The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills, the kills were often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter.
Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us.
Lol, talk about propaganda and biased stories. Your silver tongue makes me wanna puke Psychotic, you've gotta do better than that. Your measly 60 billion isk in kills over the course of 6 days is re-generated in 2-3 hours in incursions. The only thing you are managing to do is bounding incursion runners together and reinforcing their hatred and suspicion against petty griefers. How does it feel? That no matter what you do it is easily redone and the footprint you've put in the sand is quickly erased by the wind. You are nothing and you shall remain nothing, but a bug squashed beneath our feet. I laugh at you sir and I pity you.
So much idiocy, I literally have no idea where to start on a retort.
Firstly, you seem to think your incursion channels are an alliance, in which all members are flying under a reimbursement policy that includes any fit they fly. I say that, because apparently you're quoting the net income from all of the incursion runners in your fantasy "we didn't want those faction fit battleships anyway" tirade. When someone loses a 4bil fit, it takes THEM AS AN INDIVIDUAL a lot more than "2-3 hours" to work that back. Try 25+ hours.
It's also quite hilarious to see how mad you are.
I've never met a worse breed of player of any game, at any point, than I have met in the Incursion channels. Ammzi is pretty much the posterchild for the basement dwelling elite who grind these things every ******* second they are logged in. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
127
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:59:00 -
[118] - Quote
blah blah high sec bull **** |

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 00:53:00 -
[119] - Quote
Killstealing wrote:blah blah high sec bull ****
Look at me!!! There are different numbers in the upper left hand corner of my monitor... trolololol |

rareden
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 00:54:00 -
[120] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:rareden wrote:http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=80
If it's a PVP fit, it sucks. If it's a sleeper PVE fit, it also sucks.
indeed it is a pvp fit and yes it sucks
zomg what the hell http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=99 medium shield booster raven best raven??
TROLOLOL!! http://burning.griefwatch.net/?p=details&kill=95 |
|

Desudes
Federal Defence Union Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 01:51:00 -
[121] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Killstealing wrote:blah blah high sec bull **** Look at me!!! There are different numbers in the upper left hand corner of my monitor... trolololol
Just wanted to say your avatar is overdoing it. Looks like he's looking at a star or something, or just got smacked in the face. Excuse me, but what the f*ck are you desu? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
99
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 02:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Ammzi wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:
The incursionbears themselves have been great hosts. They commonly announce our presence to each other, while making furtive superstitious hand gestures to ward us off, like we were some kind of evil spirits. At the same time, they've continued to feed us a steady supply of kills, the kills were often in Machs and Nightmares. We've even gotten to watch their perception of us develop over that time. On the first day they thought we were all Slimy Worm's alts. By the third day they were claiming we had been black-listed for the better part of a year. On the fifth day someone say a Velator wreck in an OTA and announced that we had 'can flagged' that incursion and nobody should enter.
Our impact has been such that they feel like they've been persecuted for weeks or even monthes and are flat out telling each other ghost stories about us.
Lol, talk about propaganda and biased stories. Your silver tongue makes me wanna puke Psychotic, you've gotta do better than that. Your measly 60 billion isk in kills over the course of 6 days is re-generated in 2-3 hours in incursions. The only thing you are managing to do is bounding incursion runners together and reinforcing their hatred and suspicion against petty griefers. How does it feel? That no matter what you do it is easily redone and the footprint you've put in the sand is quickly erased by the wind. You are nothing and you shall remain nothing, but a bug squashed beneath our feet. I laugh at you sir and I pity you. So much idiocy, I literally have no idea where to start on a retort. Firstly, you seem to think your incursion channels are an alliance, in which all members are flying under a reimbursement policy that includes any fit they fly. I say that, because apparently you're quoting the net income from all of the incursion runners in your fantasy "we didn't want those faction fit battleships anyway" tirade. When someone loses a 4bil fit, it takes THEM AS AN INDIVIDUAL a lot more than "2-3 hours" to work that back. Try 25+ hours. It's also quite hilarious to see how mad you are. I've never met a worse breed of player of any game, at any point, than I have met in the Incursion channels. Ammzi is pretty much the posterchild for the basement dwelling elite who grind these things every ******* second they are logged in.
I love you, cause I never thought I'd meet someone who could actually portray me the way you are and for that I think you are special! My eternal gratitude to you and your failed judge of character.
What? Incursion channels as an alliance? God no! When did I ever say that? That's exactly what we AREN'T and that's one of the strengths of incursion runners, we're different pilots from all over EVE drawn together for 1 single goal. It's not my fault you misunderstand the context. That ship reimbursement fund is only for the BTL pub channel anyhow and it doesn't even cover all ships or all the sites. There's so much stuff you're unaware of that it gives you the wrong perspective of what is really going on. You're the one saying "your channels" and I've earlier in this thread asked you to define that term, because I can't be a part of a channel or own a channel or in anyway be associated with a channel if I've never known that channel nor been in it. There's dozens of channels (again repeating myself from earlier on) for incursions and they are all different.
The griefers themselves (read skunkworks and co) count the kills globally, so why shouldn't I count the losses globally and put it up against that? When they say "we made incursion runners lose 60 b isk over the course of 6 days" I'll say "Over the course of 6 days incursion runners have earned trillions."
*shrugs* I am not mad and I don't lie. When I said I laughed I was literally grinning at Psychotic Monk's post (yes in freaking real life). I thought his cute little post was hilarious.
Uh, the famous basement dwellers, sometimes I wonder if those who use that argument aren't dwellers themselves, basement or no basement  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
249
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 02:28:00 -
[123] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:Just want to add my 10 cents here. You're gonna need a lot more zeroes before we care. 
carmelos53 wrote:You still only killed 2 armor pilots in our channel so keep talking.. U might one day actually believed what you are saying. You act like we EVER said we were targeting your channel. Our campaign is, and always has been, against incursions in general. But don't fret, cupcake. We haven't forgotten you.
carmelos53 wrote:people havnt pvped for 2 weeks now so maybe when you guys decide to fight that might happen. But...there's so much shiny to kill!
Meh. I'm always late for the goodfights anyway. I have to find my own most of the time.
carmelos53 wrote:Still have that 200mil pride bet going on. Only Two more days until it's over.
Oh there's a time limit now? Funny thing about you carebears: you love instant gratification. Infiltrators, on the other hand, can spend months gaining trust and access before yanking the rug out from under you. We play a long game, something you lot are incapable of doing. I'll remind you of this when you're on my killboard.
I've already figured out how you guys could completely avoid what we're doing without being antisocial pricks. That's going to be my little secret, though; I'm waiting to see if anyone else thinks of it.
edit: A funny thing has been happening on our killboard tonight as I check in on it: non-skunks are appearing on the kills. Care to guess what that means? |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one Burning Spear.
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 12:49:00 -
[124] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
edit: A funny thing has been happening on our killboard tonight as I check in on it: non-skunks are appearing on the kills. Care to guess what that means?
Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too?
I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
|

Desudes
Federal Defence Union Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 16:00:00 -
[125] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
edit: A funny thing has been happening on our killboard tonight as I check in on it: non-skunks are appearing on the kills. Care to guess what that means?
Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too? I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
You're really doing a good job making incursion runners look mentally deficient. Can't believe ****** is censored. Excuse me, but what the f*ck are you desu? |

Twilight Mourning
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 18:28:00 -
[126] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote: Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too?
I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
You all need to get off your high horse and quit pretending. Two people from the Burning Spear. alliance helped kill my faction battleship last night. Why the hell are you even posting in here when you guys are ******* helping them? Making fun of them about an internet spaceships game when you're no better than they are. Bunch of faggots.
Yah, this is an alt. I already lost one faction ship, not about to give you guys a chance to take another one. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
34
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 18:48:00 -
[127] - Quote
Twilight Mourning wrote:carmelos53 wrote: Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too?
I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
You all need to get off your high horse and quit pretending. Two people from the Burning Spear. alliance helped kill my faction battleship last night. Why the hell are you even posting in here when you guys are ******* helping them? Making fun of them about an internet spaceships game when you're no better than they are. Bunch of faggots. Yah, this is an alt. I already lost one faction ship, not about to give you guys a chance to take another one.
you probably were in a "unauthorized" mom fleet and didn't give TDF/BTL carmelos53 the loot so they banned you and decced you |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
100
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 18:55:00 -
[128] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:Twilight Mourning wrote:carmelos53 wrote: Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too?
I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
You all need to get off your high horse and quit pretending. Two people from the Burning Spear. alliance helped kill my faction battleship last night. Why the hell are you even posting in here when you guys are ******* helping them? Making fun of them about an internet spaceships game when you're no better than they are. Bunch of faggots. Yah, this is an alt. I already lost one faction ship, not about to give you guys a chance to take another one. you probably were in a "unauthorized" mom fleet and didn't give TDF/BTL carmelos53 the loot so they banned you and decced you
^this quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
564
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 19:16:00 -
[129] - Quote
SOLO 4 LYFE GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
252
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 22:30:00 -
[130] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:Sure I'll take a stab at it. You've found more people who enjoy showering once a week too? Oh come on, don't be coy.
carmelos53 wrote:I have to ask. Your girl friend in eve... Is she cute? Does she satisfy you? Did you remember to deflate her?
My wife won't play Eve :( |
|

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 22:50:00 -
[131] - Quote
If only they had some equivalent to viagra for ship toasting... then these guys might not have to be so impotent. |

Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:01:00 -
[132] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Only a pubbie would think that people other than Goons use the term "pubbie".
What's a pubbie, and is it edible? |

Lord Tarantula
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:11:00 -
[133] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Mace Ormond wrote:It seems you boys want to build yourselves up a name as bad boy griefers, but of course are less forthcoming about all of being funded by high sec carebearing through your incursion and industry corporations.
I have never in my life run an incursion, and I abandoned any pretense of industry a long time ago. What money doesn't come from the wrecks of our targets, I get through wormhole exploration. That can pay about as well as highsec incursions, only you're operating in nullsec without a local channel list. So much for your theories. edit: Here's my take on Incursions. They make as much isk as I did running wormholes, but in the safety of highsec. They are wrecking the value loyalty points, making the game harder for casual mission runners who don't have the time to chase incursions and put together fleets (no I don't do missions either) in what time they have to play. They are creating a steady stream of stuff going into the market without much being taken out, resulting in general inflation. Incursions NEED to be more dangerous, because as they stand now they are just isk printers driving up the price of everything and hurting everyone who isn't being an incursion bear (except maybe the self-sufficient wormhole corps).
low sec thata-way hero ......------> |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:12:00 -
[134] - Quote
I offten eat a bowel of pubbie-Os for breafast with my wife  |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
252
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:56:00 -
[135] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:I offten eat a bowel of pubbie-Os for breakfast with my wife  hahahahahahahahhaha
I love you Gaz. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
252
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 23:58:00 -
[136] - Quote
Lord Tarantula wrote:low sec thata-way hero ......------> W-space is more fun. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 01:06:00 -
[137] - Quote
So we've been getting so many kills and ransoms and ejects that we're kinda drowning in faction BSs right now.
And we want the boat violence to spread.
So here's what we'll do. First person who links me 10b in incursion **** killed from the date/time of this post onwards gets a free Navy Apoc.
That's right. A Navy Apoc. No joke. If anyone actually cares we can contact Chribba about it, but I assure you I'm serious as a heart attack.
Kills must be on Battleclinic and and must be API verified. All the kills must be one one character. |

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 05:06:00 -
[138] - Quote
Lord Tarantula wrote: low sec thata-way hero ......------>
Posts with alt. Wants a safer high-sec with more sunshine and lollipops.
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 07:18:00 -
[139] - Quote
Here's a kill we got on somebody who is apparently a big deal on the Battleclinic forums or something. He locked the comments and we knew somebody with the power to unlock it and he's all embarassed and stuff.
It's pretty lulzy. Read them comments.
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14562526#comments |

Officer Nyota Uhura
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:50:00 -
[140] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Both of my Artbirator BPOs and six data cores were in there.
Fail.
I like your cause, sir, but that's still a fail. |
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:58:00 -
[141] - Quote
Our buddy who was on the scene scooped the lab that had them, so no loss, even. Close one.
On the other hand, even if we had lost that, 110m loss vs. Nightmare someone ejected from while they were shooting that... v0v |

Officer Nyota Uhura
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 09:20:00 -
[142] - Quote
So the incursionbears have adopted a new strategy to avoid killmails that we use to ridicule them here.... They eject from their ships before they're destroyed?
Nice job, fellas, nice job. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 10:20:00 -
[143] - Quote
Everyone claims to have no isk. So we ask about assets the can contract us. Or we tell them they can eject and we'll give them back their mods, so they don't walk away empty handed.
We've gotten a Mach, a Nightmare, a Loki and a Navy Apoc that way.
We've outfitted basically all our dudes in hilarious shiny **** and intend to start handing them to non-skunks who start doing this. Look at my other thread on this board for details on that. We're handing out the Apoc already. |

Officer Nyota Uhura
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 11:04:00 -
[144] - Quote
MmmmmuuuhahahahaHAHAHA!
This is the best shiit I've read for ages in C&P! Please keep on posting. |

Dasrufken
Nova Ardour
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:18:00 -
[145] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote: Big mistake making this post public . Now everyone knows you guys can't defend yourselves. The only time your pvp griefer Corp gets on kms is when they have no chance.
Hey carmelos, its worth noting that you and your friends cant really defend yourselves either.
http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7034 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7035 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7045 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7064 (love the fact that he didn't bring any cap boosters ^^) http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7065 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7066 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7067 http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7068 (love those lack of filled mid and highslots) http://nova.eve-arts.com/killboard/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7071
Please tell your buddies to not fail so hard will yah?
PS: Tell niteninja to stop whining about us never forming up a fleet, because all you guys do when we have formed up is start running like little girls back towards amarr (even though you're so slow that my triple plated and trimarked phoon could catch up to you) and when you inevitably get caught up to, send out a sacrificial draek (or vindicator) and proceed to dock.
Quote:We've outfitted basically all our dudes in hilarious shiny **** and intend to start handing them to non-skunks who start doing this. Look at my other thread on this board for details on that. We're handing out the Apoc already.
I can has?
|

Cerisia
Lone Star enterprises
332
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:27:00 -
[146] - Quote
Officer Nyota Uhura wrote:MmmmmuuuhahahahaHAHAHA!
This is the best shiit I've read for ages in C&P! Please keep on posting.
Indeed , I'm loving this thread  Free Lyris Nairn, goodposter extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar. |

Adriana Mal'Valeran
B.O.O.M ECONOMICS SOLUTIONS INC United Rock Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 12:55:00 -
[147] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:LOL not aware of a pos kill? 1 offline pos was killed and we just finished off the active large. An eye for an eye. thanks champs. Nice try with the alliance hoping to invalidate the wars too. Unfortunately there are ways around it.
Not really wanting to play the tough guy card here but now we are even. Have fun killing randomy pilots who can't defend themselves. The pos kills definately cover our 2 loses.
No hard feelings.
Oh yea, i was there. They even played around with me a bit...
Then tried to gank me with 2 maelstroms, thrasher and a Navy Slicer =(
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14554090
http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=14554079
WHY DOES NOONE LIKE ME =( |

Officer Nyota Uhura
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 14:14:00 -
[148] - Quote
Adriana Mal'Valeran wrote:WHY DOES NOONE LIKE ME =(
Because we don't like pilots who don't API verify their killmails. That's why. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
121
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 18:13:00 -
[149] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence. I agree 100 percent and I think this is a problem that should be addressed. The problem with high-sec incursions is that they can be extended indefinitely. They will put off killing the mothership for WEEKS to grind Vanguards, one every 60 seconds or so during active hours in a single constellation.
I have talked at length with one of the people in charge of TDF; he agrees wholeheartedly that incursions in general are broken and that Vanguards and other sites should not spawn indefinitely once the mothership appears. At the same time, he is obligated by a MASSIVE conflict of interest not to bring this to CCP's attention.
I too am a bit conflicted about bringing this up as some of my friends make ISK this way, but it has to be said: Incursions need to be nerfed. People have obviously figured out how to run them; make the system control bar move much slower and make the Sansha regain control faster, but don't let more sites spawn for too long after it is ready to be completed; the amortized maximum ISK/LP output for incursions needs to be changed vastly downwards, from its current 70+ billion isk per day (that's vanguards alone; also, that's a trillion raw isk in 2 weeks not counting LP).
I hate to be the antagonist to so many people who play the game, but the brokenness of Incursions is one of the playerbase's best kept secrets. And, as the OP said, they do act as a stagnating influence in many cases; players that would be otherwise engaged in something that isn't safe high-sec grinding spend hours and days running Vanguards making billions upon billions. It has to stop somewhere. |

Richard Whiteyes
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 19:56:00 -
[150] - Quote
I only just got into the cursions, but generally I don't think this is a personal attack, this is being done for the same reason as sucide ganking mackinaws, killing mission runners or decing high sec noobs. Its just something to do, and it can yield some really nice kills.
Since ive started incursioning I've been buying shiner ships and losing more ships, what goes around comes around so its likely that you'll just see more noobs with ships they shouldn't be in as a reasult of this.
Cursions, even though I hate to say it should probablly be nerfed though, the income does sort of blow any other career out of the water providing you have the ships to get in the fleets.
From a guy you would probablly gank
Rich. Richards Rampage PvP video:-áhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYu0xC9Gv0 |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
101
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 20:00:00 -
[151] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote: I agree 100 percent and I think this is a problem that should be addressed. The problem with high-sec incursions is that they can be extended indefinitely. They will put off killing the mothership for WEEKS to grind Vanguards, one every 60 seconds or so during active hours in a single constellation.
I have a deep found respect for Moar Tears and their work, but fools like you give them a bad name. Weeks? Are you really that dumb and naive? Why do people talk about stuff which they have no clue about!? Do you walk around daily as well claiming you're a chiropractor, nascar driver and a miss beauty queen? An incursion in a constellation can't last more than a week or it will remove itself. Learn STUFF before you talk about STUFF.
Iam Widdershins wrote: but the brokenness of Incursions is one of the playerbase's best kept secrets..
Again, are you really that naive to believe CCP aren't reading this or well aware of this? For the love of the sacred coconut, WE ARE ON A PUBLIC FORUM YOU PICKWIT. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 20:12:00 -
[152] - Quote
Dasrufken wrote: I can has?
Yes. Link me 10b in incursion **** killed with none of the kills being before the post I mentioned this in originally last night. They've got to be API verified.
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Putz.
258
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:08:00 -
[153] - Quote
Officer Nyota Uhura wrote:MmmmmuuuhahahahaHAHAHA!
This is the best shiit I've read for ages in C&P! Please keep on posting.
The guys who are already out there shooting should easily break the 100 billion mark in the next few hours. Unless, of course, everyone ejects from their ships.
I have a new escalation planned for next week. It should be entertaining. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Putz.
258
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:15:00 -
[154] - Quote
Officer Nyota Uhura wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Both of my Artbirator BPOs and six data cores were in there. Fail. I like your cause, sir, but that's still a fail.
Meh. In our line of work, one tends to acquire whatever BPOs pass by. |

Marcoss Marshall
Society of Free Agents
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 21:33:00 -
[155] - Quote
i'm confused. i was looking at ur kbs and u were ganking armor stuff, then u stopped. did something happen? u scared of TDF? |

Odemis
Putz.
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:36:00 -
[156] - Quote
BOOM - 100 Billion isk destroyed |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 22:41:00 -
[157] - Quote
/golfclap for us. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
122
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:14:00 -
[158] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote: I agree 100 percent and I think this is a problem that should be addressed. The problem with high-sec incursions is that they can be extended indefinitely. They will put off killing the mothership for WEEKS to grind Vanguards, one every 60 seconds or so during active hours in a single constellation.
I have a deep found respect for Moar Tears and their work, but fools like you give them a bad name. Weeks? Are you really that dumb and naive? Why do people talk about stuff which they have no clue about!? Do you walk around daily as well claiming you're a chiropractor, nascar driver and a miss beauty queen? An incursion in a constellation can't last more than a week or it will remove itself. Learn STUFF before you talk about STUFF. Iam Widdershins wrote: but the brokenness of Incursions is one of the playerbase's best kept secrets.. Again, are you really that naive to believe CCP aren't reading this or well aware of this? For the love of the sacred coconut, WE ARE ON A PUBLIC FORUM YOU PICKWIT. I'm just repeating what I heard from someone who knows a hell of a lot more about incursions than I do, namely a TDF director.
Even if they do shut themselves down in 1 week (I don't really know and don't particularly care), that's hundreds of billions of isk paid out, not counting LP, to a very limited number of pilots who spend their time doing little else. My main concern is that this is, as I quoted, a stagnating influence.
There is much less fuss made about the imbalanced nature of Incursions, as almost anyone who cares can actually do them themselves and make enormous quantities of isk, and therefore very few people actually think it should be changed; if there is a single problem with nullsec anomalies not paying out correctly, half of EVE would be up in arms on the forums, but with incursions it has been a long, slow percolation. Sure, CCP is aware, but the playerbase doesn't really keep any true secrets; it's a relative term. I'm sure I'm nowhere near the first to point this out, but it's something that deserves more attention.
You are being ragey and obtuse, please take your terrible rage and pointless insults elsewhere unless you can actually comment on the matter at hand. I think it's cute and all that you're so up in arms the moment someone says that your main income source should be removed, but seriously now. |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
122
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 23:14:00 -
[159] - Quote
forum broke; doublepost |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:02:00 -
[160] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote:Ammzi wrote:Iam Widdershins wrote: I agree 100 percent and I think this is a problem that should be addressed. The problem with high-sec incursions is that they can be extended indefinitely. They will put off killing the mothership for WEEKS to grind Vanguards, one every 60 seconds or so during active hours in a single constellation.
I have a deep found respect for Moar Tears and their work, but fools like you give them a bad name. Weeks? Are you really that dumb and naive? Why do people talk about stuff which they have no clue about!? Do you walk around daily as well claiming you're a chiropractor, nascar driver and a miss beauty queen? An incursion in a constellation can't last more than a week or it will remove itself. Learn STUFF before you talk about STUFF. Iam Widdershins wrote: but the brokenness of Incursions is one of the playerbase's best kept secrets.. Again, are you really that naive to believe CCP aren't reading this or well aware of this? For the love of the sacred coconut, WE ARE ON A PUBLIC FORUM YOU PICKWIT. I'm just repeating what I heard from someone who knows a hell of a lot more about incursions than I do, namely a TDF director. Even if they do shut themselves down in 1 week (I don't really know and don't particularly care), that's hundreds of billions of isk paid out, not counting LP, to a very limited number of pilots who spend their time doing little else. My main concern is that this is, as I quoted, a stagnating influence. There is much less fuss made about the imbalanced nature of Incursions, as almost anyone who cares can actually do them themselves and make enormous quantities of isk, and therefore very few people actually think it should be changed; if there is a single problem with nullsec anomalies not paying out correctly, half of EVE would be up in arms on the forums, but with incursions it has been a long, slow percolation. Sure, CCP is aware, but the playerbase doesn't really keep any true secrets; it's a relative term. I'm sure I'm nowhere near the first to point this out, but it's something that deserves more attention. You are being ragey and obtuse, please take your terrible rage and pointless insults elsewhere unless you can actually comment on the matter at hand. I think it's cute and all that you're so up in arms the moment someone says that your main income source should be removed, but seriously now.
But you're wrong. I mean I understand why you look at it from this perspective, being so unaware of so many variables and facts that intervene and interact in this enormous system.
I raged because it's the same deal, over and over again, in the same thread, but from different people. And yes I do understand you don't wanna read it all, but now I have to repeat myself.
You don't have the eyes of CCP, you don't have their data at hand and you can not judge what is affecting the economy in which way with a high accuracy. We can only guess, discuss and estimate. The thing is, if incursions were messing up the economy then CCP would step in and do something about it. They monitor this closely, however since they haven't (yet) it must be working out fine so far. Right?
The other thing is it is extremely limited how many pilots can participate in incursions in highsec before it gets absolutely worthless to do it. Yes, the general saying is "anyone can join in", but if everyone joined it there wouldn't be anything for anyone! Crowded systems in vanguards, assaults and headquarters will ultimately leave everyone out better doing lvl 4's.
Please consider these numbers and weigh them against what you think about the rest of EVE. At maximum peak times during the week incursions in highsec can generate up to 30 billion isk an hour (direct ISK faucet). At average this number is much, much lower. At maximum peak times about 500 pilots are ACTIVELY in a fleet running incursions in highsec. This is what is causing all the trouble? Because an average of little less than 500 pilots are running incursions in highsec? Because 5 % of the EVE population is doing incursions ^ that many people are pissed and jelly?
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:09:00 -
[161] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:You don't have the eyes of CCP, you don't have their data at hand and you can not judge what is affecting the economy in which way with a high accuracy. We can only guess, discuss and estimate. The thing is, if incursions were messing up the economy then CCP would step in and do something about it. They monitor this closely, however since they haven't (yet) it must be working out fine so far. Right?
counterpoint: technetium
also you're dumb hth
|

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:25:00 -
[162] - Quote
This is beautiful. Keep up the good work, gentlemen. If I were still in hi-sec, I would love to be there on the front lines with you, nothing I love more than griefing bears. If you ever manage to break a trillion isk in damages, I swear to all the gods of pew pew I'll buy you guys a faction battleship. Of course, you're probably swimming in them by now.
May you kill a thousand bears a week. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:31:00 -
[163] - Quote
Hatsumi Kobayashi wrote:Ammzi wrote:You don't have the eyes of CCP, you don't have their data at hand and you can not judge what is affecting the economy in which way with a high accuracy. We can only guess, discuss and estimate. The thing is, if incursions were messing up the economy then CCP would step in and do something about it. They monitor this closely, however since they haven't (yet) it must be working out fine so far. Right? counterpoint: technetium also you're dumb hth
Aha! I challenge you to a duel! No one insults my good name without consequences.

PS: I wouldn't know the first thing about technetium, please elaborate. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 01:26:00 -
[164] - Quote
Going into details about the technetium issue would go well beyond the scope of this thread, so let's just say that despite it being a much bigger cause for market imbalances than incursions, nothing has yet been done by CCP to change things for the better and they've been aware for just about two years now.
So saying that "oh well they haven't done anything about it yet so can't be negatively affecting the economy" with regards to the incursion isk faucet is beyond dumb. CAUTION
SNIGGS |

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University Ivy League
281
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 01:59:00 -
[165] - Quote
The "technetium" does not bring new ISK into the economy, unlike Incursions (which is an ISK faucet).
Too many ISK faucets and you end up with widespread inflation. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:03:00 -
[166] - Quote
I think today was our best kill day yet, and itGÇÖs been over a week since we started. I admit allot more incursioners recognize us and call out warnings to their brethren to watch out for us, yet people still fall into our trap while local and other incursion channels are ablaze with warnings.
The incursion bears really are spoiling us to tell the truth, and man the ghost stories we hear them talk about related to us with our alts are hilarious.
|

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:12:00 -
[167] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
The incursion bears really are spoiling us to tell the truth, and man the ghost stories we hear them talk about related to us with our alts are hilarious.
Incursion Bear 1: "Why is there a Velator wreck in this OTA?" Incursion Bear 2: "Be careful, they're can flagging the sites."
Protip: Watch out for those 'can flagged' sites!
~Andrei.
|

K1RTH G3RS3N
Unknown Soldiers RED.Legion
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:45:00 -
[168] - Quote
i didn't realise incursions supposedly make so much isk, but you have to do it in a large group right so is the reward really that great for each individual? regardless, keep up the good work, high-end bears should be ratting out in 0.0 where i can kill them not in highsec. gameplay question: if you wardec your bear alt and he goes in to be tank for an incursion and gets repped shouldn't you be able to attack that logi then? |

Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
122
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:58:00 -
[169] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:But you're wrong. I mean I understand why you look at it from this perspective, being so unaware of so many variables and facts that intervene and interact in this enormous system.
...
The thing is, if incursions were messing up the economy then CCP would step in and do something about it. They monitor this closely, however since they haven't (yet) it must be working out fine so far. Right? Wrong. I know a fair bit of economics, don't throw that bullshit at me please. Just because CCP isn't actively doing something about this doesn't mean that it isn't affecting the economy, either beneficially or adversely. It takes a MASSIVE change or a sizable length of time to affect a system the size of EVE's.
Addendum: And just because something doesn't unbalance the economy doesn't mean it's fair, or a good game mechanic. A lone pilot in a good incursion fleet can make 10 million isk every 5 minutes or better, plus LP. To catch up to this, you have to be making 50 million isk wallet flashes in nullsec.
It's not like you're going to make ANY money in incursions if you aren't fit out with really fancy equipment, either. The boundary for entry in many incursion fleets is "lots of shiny equipment" and that's basically it. It's a self-perpetuating loop, and people coming late to the game are cut out of it unless they were already rich. The rich get richer, and the poor can't get into a fleet and have to go back to slow missioning. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 02:59:00 -
[170] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:You don't have the eyes of CCP, you don't have their data at hand and you can not judge what is affecting the economy in which way with a high accuracy. We can only guess, discuss and estimate. The thing is, if incursions were messing up the economy then CCP would step in and do something about it. They monitor this closely, however since they haven't (yet) it must be working out fine so far. Right?
I'm not going to pretend to be in possession of any actual statistics or analytical data, but it's my suspicion that the possession of really expensive faction ships and mods is on a pretty consistent incline since the introduction of Incursions. A very sharp incline, I suspect. I see evidence of it here and there, and I'm fairly certain that it was much less common for characters that can barely pilot battleships (due to being less than six months old) to be so carelessly cap chaining random people up in their faction fit Machs and NMs like they're handing them out for free at every station (I'm pretty sure you've seen our KB). So please, tell me that Incursions aren't affecting the economy in the game. Also, please tell me exactly which manners of affecting the economy might offend me, because clearly you are the only one who can make a value judgement on that subject.
One statistic that I do have some insight into is the possession of really expensive faction ships and mods in The Skunkworks since we started "running" Incursions, and that bad boy is off the charts!
Seriously though, "if [noun] were messing up the [noun] then CCP would step in and do something about it." Do you even play this game? This dude is clearly a troll, but thanks for bumping our thread anyways!
~Andrei. |
|

flank steak
Ancient Malevolence Rage Alliance
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 06:16:00 -
[171] - Quote
Go skunkworks! |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 08:06:00 -
[172] - Quote
An associate today started griping about how he lost a basi because he was repping another basi when suddenly the fleet started firing on him. I lawl'd. I lawl'd harder when he showed me the KM and I immediately recognized The Skunkworks. When I brought him up to speed on what happened (he seemed sort of confused), he thanked me for the information but did not lawl with me.
Great work! |

Officer Nyota Uhura
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 13:59:00 -
[173] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:When I brought him up to speed on what happened (he seemed sort of confused), he thanked me for the information but did not lawl with me.
These incubears have no sense of humor. |

Aine Ni
Suicide Ganger
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:09:00 -
[174] - Quote
LOL !!!
Skunkworks rule, These incubears have no sense of humor, Go skunkworks!, and so many more...
Wow - really a long time since I seen so many jealous green eyed monsters in one place. Little girls that think the other girls have more fun, and that only wants to fight, if there is no risk for themselfs. Yes, they are TRUE heroes.
I SO wish I was like them...
FYI - I don't do Incursions, I dont care about how much ISK other people have/make - I just play to have fun. NOT point fingers at others. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:26:00 -
[175] - Quote
Aine, I don't think they're expressing any particular jealousy. I mean, I've made the offer several times that if people want to come along and be taught how it's done we'll teach them. A couple people have taken us up on it.
Even without that, I've seen a small handful of people doing it on their own. It's not difficult. Power power to them in those cases.
People can give us props for doing good work without wanting to stab us in the kidneys and replace us as Kings of This Week. You should probably chill out a bit. |

Lakshata Chawla
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:28:00 -
[176] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:[quote=Mace Ormond]They are creating a steady stream of stuff going into the market without much being taken out, resulting in general inflation.
You know increasing supply while demand stays the same causes prices to FALL right?
You're a greifer though, not an economist.
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:32:00 -
[177] - Quote
I know saying we killed 100+ bil worth of ships sounds impresive, and I know you can all see it on our killboard, but for al the people who don't want to look trough pages and pages on our killboard, heres a basic flat list of the ships we have killed.
Battleships: 4x Bhaalgorns 33x Machariels 20x Nightmares 2x Rattlesnakes 6x Navy Ravens Issue 11x Ravens 10x Scorpion Navy Issue 1x Fleet tempest 3x tempests 2x Megathron Navy Issue 2x Megathron 3x Rokhs 2x Maelstrom
Logistics: 16x scimitars 3x guardians 48x basilisks
Command Ships: 2x Nighthawks
Marauders: 2x golems 1x Kronos 1x Paladin 3x Vargur
Strategic Cruisers: 4x Lokis 1x Tengu
Battle Cruisers: 1x Hurricane
And thats not including faction mods, people that have ejected, people who self destructed, and people we let go if they paid a ransom. |

Officer Nyota Uhura
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:19:00 -
[178] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Shitload of bling bling.
Holy fail-flying Batman that's insane! |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
103
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:26:00 -
[179] - Quote
Iam Widdershins wrote: Wrong. I know a fair bit of economics, don't throw that bullshit at me please. Just because CCP isn't actively doing something about this doesn't mean that it isn't affecting the economy, either beneficially or adversely. It takes a MASSIVE change or a sizable length of time to affect a system the size of EVE's.
Addendum: And just because something doesn't unbalance the economy doesn't mean it's fair, or a good game mechanic. A lone pilot in a good incursion fleet can make 10 million isk every 5 minutes or better, plus LP. To catch up to this, you have to be making 50 million isk wallet flashes in nullsec.
It's not like you're going to make ANY money in incursions if you aren't fit out with really fancy equipment, either. The boundary for entry in many incursion fleets is "lots of shiny equipment" and that's basically it. It's a self-perpetuating loop, and people coming late to the game are cut out of it unless they were already rich. The rich get richer, and the poor can't get into a fleet and have to go back to slow missioning.
OK - so you have come to the conclusion that we cannot judge by ourselves whether Incursions are effectively unbalancing the EVE economy. We can guess, we can discuss, but we can't put a 99 % idiot proof theory on the table.
fair. Many forum trolls will call you stupid for coupling EVE and fair together, but I will look beside that. Are incursions fair?
I am pretty sure Skunkworks would say no or that is what they are implying or simply this is the picture I get of them. There's something they dislike about incursions and therefore are out to hurt (grief) the pilots who participate in them. I am also pretty sure that most nullsec-ponies would say no, it's not fair (even though most of them have no idea how incursions work and most of it are just what they've heard from a 3rd party, take a look for yourself in this thread!).
Quote:Are incursions supposed to be outcompeting lvl 4 missions in highsec? A big fat YES from CCP. Are you supposed to be earning a load of isk from incursions? Again a big fat YES from CCP. Are incursions balanced in different security status? Will you earn a wopping 40 % more doing incursions in null/lowsec than in highsec? A huge YES.
What I wrote in quote up there ^ are facts (and CCP statements). They are not to be discussed unless CCP themselves state otherwise.
One of Psychotic Monk's reasoning for doing this:
Quote:Now, I don't like highsec Incursions. It's not that we think less of incursionbears than we do of, say, mission-bears. It's that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something more creative or going out to null or whatever. In our opinion, it's a stagnating influence.
That reasoning is to be frank, completely ********. It's just his perspective, it is not backed up by anything. There's no data to say "Since incursions were introduced lowsec, nullsec and wormhole PVP has been stagnating. There's less PvP all over EVE and we can see an influx of pilots moving to highsec and more specifically incursion constellations."
Like I have said, but it seems like no one wants to argue with me on that. Only a few percent are actually doing incursions of the collective player base. I am not talking about how many pilots have TRIED incursions, but the size of pilots doing incursions on average of say a week. It's just a small percentage, but because it's getting so much attention from media and it's always visible on those journals or because we hear about it all the time through player news or these threads on the forum it seems like a lot, but it's not! It's only 5 % if not less. Are you even aware that the realistic limit of how many pilots can (--->actively<---) run incursions in highsec before it gets absolutely ridiculously crowded is about 500 pilots?
So what is your problem? I mean honestly there's actually not a problem. Realistically there's no:
we're trying to save the EVE economy, we're doing everyone a favor, we hope that this can move pilots to nullsec and lowsec so we can PvP more.
^that sounds like utter bullshit to me. We've agreed on, YOU as a griefer can't possibly save the EVE economy, you don't have the tools, the power or the knowledge. You're not doing everyone a favor, because not everyone agrees with you and your perspective.
The interesting thing is .. we want more pilots in lowsec and nullsec. A very nice and honorable goal, but again it does not fit reality. Killing someone's vessel continuously does not inspire people to go out and PvP. It makes them frustrated yes, it might work for some, yes, but it doesn't really give a sense of victory or in anyway encouragement to PvP.
"A guy just killed me, his reasoning is that he wants me to go PvP. Since he killed my ship and made me lose ISK I am going to listen to this lovely new friend of mine and do his bidding. I am going to start PvP'ing... even though I just lost some ISK I am sure a new PvP'er like me can earn some ISK for every day life in dangerous space.".... right? Utter bullshit.
On the other hand if pilots in highsec get wealthy they will one day consider going into lowsec,nullsec to PvP. Why not? It's not like they are gonna lose anything but a ship and a few implants. They can actually afford to lose what they fly.
Again, I don't see an overall clear reasoning for this besides reputation, tears and fun. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

disillusional
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:39:00 -
[180] - Quote
More skulls for the skull throne, more blood for the blood god! 
DEATH TO THE INCURSION COMMUNITY! |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
103
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:45:00 -
[181] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote: I'm not going to pretend to be in possession of any actual statistics or analytical data, but it's my suspicion that the possession of really expensive faction ships and mods is on a pretty consistent incline since the introduction of Incursions. A very sharp incline, I suspect. I see evidence of it here and there, and I'm fairly certain that it was much less common for characters that can barely pilot battleships (due to being less than six months old) to be so carelessly cap chaining random people up in their faction fit Machs and NMs like they're handing them out for free at every station (I'm pretty sure you've seen our KB). So please, tell me that Incursions aren't affecting the economy in the game. Also, please tell me exactly which manners of affecting the economy might offend me, because clearly you are the only one who can make a value judgement on that subject.
One statistic that I do have some insight into is the possession of really expensive faction ships and mods in The Skunkworks since we started "running" Incursions, and that bad boy is off the charts!
Seriously though, "if [noun] were messing up the [noun] then CCP would step in and do something about it." Do you even play this game? This dude is clearly a troll, but thanks for bumping our thread anyways!
~Andrei.
So you're saying you're not happy that people bling their ships out so you can kill them and get their bling for yourself? Or are you saying that because of incursions more people bling out their ships? (Definitely a plausible theory). How can I tell you that incursions are not affecting the economy? How can I say that a feature that generates ISK is not affecting a market that uses ISK as valuta? Why are you asking me to lie? OF COURSE it's affecting it, but in which way and direction is not something you can (or me if you think me as some holy god) say. Again, we can GUESS, we can DISCUSS, but we can't proof it with 99 % certainty without having every little variable accounted for and we don't have access to this.
Bear with me on this hypothetical scenario. You are walking with your monkey down the street and arrive at your garage. You decide to give the monkey a brick. The monkey is now taking that brick and smashing it against your car and house repeatedly. (Keep bearing with me). You are now standing by laughing because you think it's hilarious to see everything you have worked for being destroyed in front of your eyes.
Now explain this to me logically. Why would CCP hand out a feature to the playerbase and the playerbase is starting to ruin the game with that feature. Why would CCP let the playerbase KEEP that feature if it is continuing to ruin their game, their product, everything that they have worked for and what gives them a roof over their head?
And I asked logically, not something in the lines of "CCP wants to ruin their game so they can screw up their economy and fire everyone they have employed", because that my dear friend is not logical.
If [noun] was ruining the game (let's be honest here ... the EVE market is a pretty serious part of the game and much more urgent to be fixed than blasters and what ever stuff people have complained about) then CCP would intervene and fix it.
And if you don't believe that well then I am sorry to break it to you, but then you are one bittervet ...
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Officer Nyota Uhura
51
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:00:00 -
[182] - Quote
Guys, guys! Your endless tl;dr posts are now turning our attention from the most important thing:
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Battleships:...4x Bhaalgorns...33x Machariels...20x Nightmares...2x Rattlesnakes...6x Navy Ravens Issue... 11x Ravens... 10x Scorpion Navy Issue... 1x Fleet tempest... 3x tempests... 2x Megathron Navy Issue... 2x Megathron... 3x Rokhs... 2x Maelstrom... 16x scimitars... 3x guardians... 48x basilisks... 2x Nighthawks... 2x golems... 1x Kronos.... 1x Paladin... 3x Vargur... 4x Lokis... 1x Tengu... 1x Hurricane
Now look at that crazy-ass pile of dead bling-a-bling-zing awesomeness! |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:15:00 -
[183] - Quote
Ammzi wrote: Big wall of text, one of the major points of which is that we're wrong in our conclusion that incursions, unbalanced by enterprising assholes like ourselves, are a not good for the game.
Ammzi, I think you're wrong, although it's not impossible that you're spot on. We can go back and forth with walls of text for weeks, and I'm sure we will, but it doesn't change the fact that we have the leverage to act on our opinion, which is the part that really matters.
Also, even if you did manage to convince me of your position, it doesn't adress the number one reason we're doing this: It's fun as hell. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
103
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:39:00 -
[184] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Ammzi wrote: Big wall of text, one of the major points of which is that we're wrong in our conclusion that incursions, unbalanced by enterprising assholes like ourselves, are a not good for the game. Ammzi, I think you're wrong, although it's not impossible that you're spot on. We can go back and forth with walls of text for weeks, and I'm sure we will, but it doesn't change the fact that we have the leverage to act on our opinion, which is the part that really matters. Also, even if you did manage to convince me of your position, it doesn't adress the number one reason we're doing this: It's fun as hell.
YES!! Exactly you get it.  I just want to clarify why everyone is doing this and what bugs me the most is people saying "this about incursions or that about incursions". That's what I want to discuss, because people don't get the whole picture (I probably missed something too).
But definitely. Sometimes you gotta ask yourself a question in EVE, should I do this or should I not? And you can decide this by asking yourself a simple question...
Quote:Is what I am going to do be fun for me?
If that answer is yes, then YES! DO IT!! For the love of the sacred coconut, have fun! And if you are having fun doing this Psychotic Monk (and it seems like you are) then by all means. Continue!
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 18:48:00 -
[185] - Quote
Oh yeah. I thought I made it clear. Our number one reason for doing this is that it's fun as ****. Everything else is just gravy. |

disillusional
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:26:00 -
[186] - Quote
Ammzi isn't the type to understand core EVE concepts such as gravy and for the lul'z. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:20:00 -
[187] - Quote
Officer Nyota Uhura wrote:Guys, guys! Your endless tl;dr posts are now turning our attention from the most important thing: Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Battleships:...4x Bhaalgorns...33x Machariels...20x Nightmares...2x Rattlesnakes...6x Navy Ravens Issue... 11x Ravens... 10x Scorpion Navy Issue... 1x Fleet tempest... 3x tempests... 2x Megathron Navy Issue... 2x Megathron... 3x Rokhs... 2x Maelstrom... 16x scimitars... 3x guardians... 48x basilisks... 2x Nighthawks... 2x golems... 1x Kronos.... 1x Paladin... 3x Vargur... 4x Lokis... 1x Tengu... 1x Hurricane Now look at that crazy-ass pile of dead bling-a-bling-zing awesomeness!
yeah seeign 33 Mach kills in 10 days makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:20:00 -
[188] - Quote
disillusional wrote:Ammzi isn't the type to understand core EVE concepts such as gravy and for the lul'z.
*pads disillusional on his head* It's alright mate, it's the drug's fault. Not yours. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

disillusional
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:45:00 -
[189] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:disillusional wrote:Ammzi isn't the type to understand core EVE concepts such as gravy and for the lul'z. *pads disillusional on his head* It's alright mate, it's the drug's fault. Not yours.
/growl |

TheMcNaughty
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:07:00 -
[190] - Quote
disillusional wrote:Ammzi wrote:disillusional wrote:Ammzi isn't the type to understand core EVE concepts such as gravy and for the lul'z. *pads disillusional on his head* It's alright mate, it's the drug's fault. Not yours. /growl
not empty quoting |
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Putz.
263
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:34:00 -
[191] - Quote
Lakshata Chawla wrote:You know increasing supply while demand stays the same causes prices to FALL right?
You're a greifer though, not an economist.
Let's print 10 trillion dollars and put it in the market and see what happens. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Putz.
263
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:39:00 -
[192] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Yeah seeing 33 Mach kills in 10 days makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside
How many have we stolen? I know I negotiated another ejection this morning. I'm pretty sure our number of Machs is closer to 40 by the time we count those. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:48:00 -
[193] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
So you're saying you're not happy that people bling their ships out so you can kill them and get their bling for yourself? Or are you saying that because of incursions more people bling out their ships? (Definitely a plausible theory).
The thing I clearly said was the latter; it was intended to illustrate an economic influence in Eve, by Incursions. I'm also quite emphatic about the former, judging by my wallet and the free Mach in my hangar.
Ammzi wrote:
How can I tell you that incursions are not affecting the economy? How can I say that a feature that generates ISK is not affecting a market that uses ISK as valuta? Why are you asking me to lie? OF COURSE it's affecting it, but in which way and direction is not something you can (or me if you think me as some holy god) say. Again, we can GUESS, we can DISCUSS, but we can't proof it with 99 % certainty without having every little variable accounted for and we don't have access to this.
Do you think we'd even be having a discussion about the effects on the economy if the subject here were L4 missions (or Sanctums) instead of Incursions?
Ammzi wrote:
Bear with me on this hypothetical scenario. You are walking with your monkey down the street and arrive at your garage. You decide to give the monkey a brick. The monkey is now taking that brick and smashing it against your car and house repeatedly. (Keep bearing with me). You are now standing by laughing because you think it's hilarious to see everything you have worked for being destroyed in front of your eyes.
Can we replace my monkey with the DRF? And the brick could be, say, a blob of supercaps? My Garage could be something like 70% of 0.0 space in Eve? Oh right, that might muddle your scenario a bit.. Never mind that, then.
So, if Incursions flood the market with ISK (which is not the national currency of Iceland), which players can use to easily buy PLEX (which probably is the national currency of Iceland) from running Incursions, but they only need to buy a few PLEX first so that they can afford to get into the shiny fleets... It sounds like I'm giving my monkeys a really easy job that brings more cars into my garage? In fact, it sounds like exactly what CCP wanted from the community when they introduced the NeX. But that's only if you frame it that way, I hadn't even considered it in that light before.
Ammzi wrote:
Now explain this to me logically. Why would CCP hand out a feature to the playerbase and the playerbase is starting to ruin the game with that feature. Why would CCP let the playerbase KEEP that feature if it is continuing to ruin their game, their product, everything that they have worked for and what gives them a roof over their head?
And I asked logically, not something in the lines of "CCP wants to ruin their game so they can screw up their economy and fire everyone they have employed", because that my dear friend is not logical.
If this is going to be your claim, then the burden of proof will be upon you to prove it. There are plenty of features in this game that make it worse (in varying degrees) and yet have not been addressed. I never said Incursions would ruin Eve. My hand was actually forced in this particular matter. One member of my corp griefed a handful of logistics running Incursions (SKNK. does not frown upon griefing in corp downtime), and our entire corp was blacklisted and banned from all the decent channels, as well as wardec'd by mercenaries hired by some ambiguous blob from those channels. Now, with the most fluid ISK faucet in the game denied to me, the next most fluid ISK faucet turned out to be killing the largest collection of shiny ships gathered into one hunting ground in the history of the game. What did I have to lose anyways? It turned out to be something like equivalent risk and equivalent rewards to Incursions. This is why we joke that we run Incursions, we just shoot the squares instead of the pluses.
Ammzi wrote:
If [noun] was ruining the game (let's be honest here ... the EVE market is a pretty serious part of the game and much more urgent to be fixed than blasters and what ever stuff people have complained about) then CCP would intervene and fix it.
And if you don't believe that well then I am sorry to break it to you, but then you are one bittervet ...
Implying that nullsec isn't a pretty serious part of the game? Also, and more specifically, implying that Gallente ships aren't a pretty serious part of the game? Well, until winter I'd partially agree with you there...
Look man, this process has made me pretty rich, very quickly, and with no blowback (again I was banned from all the places I'm banned from before I even considered griefing any Incursion bears). It's also hilarious (it seems you don't get the joke, but look around the comments here because some people do), a little suspenseful, challenging at times (you try to get more than one pubby to swap into a cap transfer--while a small mob of angry pubbies spam the local Incursion channel, Dscan, and probe you down--and set up a cap chain inside your trap while the reward for success could easily be 4 Billion ISK), and definitely fun. Plus, it got us on the TV in the CQ and on those Concord billboards in space! All for a little over one week of focus. I'm as smug as Shadoo commentating AT9 right now.
~Andrei.
|

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:51:00 -
[194] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Lakshata Chawla wrote:You know increasing supply while demand stays the same causes prices to FALL right?
You're a greifer though, not an economist.
Let's print 10 trillion dollars and put it in the market and see what happens.
^What Floppie said.
You know that ISK represents DEMAND in this market, right?
You're a terrible poster though, not an economist.
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:53:00 -
[195] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Yeah seeing 33 Mach kills in 10 days makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside How many have we stolen? I know I negotiated another ejection this morning. I'm pretty sure our number of Machs is closer to 40 by the time we count those.
We convinced two Nightmares and a Loki to eject last night, to be added to the previous list (which I do not have handy, but contained at least one Loki, Navy Apoc, two Nightmares, and a Mach or two... iirc).
~Andrei. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:45:00 -
[196] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Yeah seeing 33 Mach kills in 10 days makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside How many have we stolen? I know I negotiated another ejection this morning. I'm pretty sure our number of Machs is closer to 40 by the time we count those. We convinced two Nightmares and a Loki to eject last night, to be added to the previous list (which I do not have handy, but contained at least one Loki, Navy Apoc, two Nightmares, and a Mach or two... iirc). ~Andrei.
Awww and still no rattle snake for me. Might have to get a free nightmare just for lulz |

Marcoss Marshall
Society of Free Agents
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:51:00 -
[197] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote: 16x scimitars 3x guardians 48x basilisks
wtf is wrong with this picture. am i srsly the only one seeing this? i seen lots of ppl lfaf last night and none of them got ganked. |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:52:00 -
[198] - Quote
Why the **** are you people arguing about economics? Keep blowing up care bears and posting delicious killmails, no one gives a damn why you're doing it, we just enjoy the lulz. Beeteedubs, blowing up incursion bears closes off the isk faucet a bit. |

Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:58:00 -
[199] - Quote
Sounds like you guys are having fun, your provoking a fair amount of tears as well. |

Arand Nersar
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 04:01:00 -
[200] - Quote
Marcoss Marshall wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote: 16x scimitars 3x guardians 48x basilisks
wtf is wrong with this picture. am i srsly the only one seeing this? i seen lots of ppl lfaf last night and none of them got ganked.
I was kind of wondering that myself. There are a TON of shield ganks but not a single armor gank? I'm sensing a little bit of bias here. |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 08:46:00 -
[201] - Quote
Arand Nersar wrote:Marcoss Marshall wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote: 16x scimitars 3x guardians 48x basilisks
wtf is wrong with this picture. am i srsly the only one seeing this? i seen lots of ppl lfaf last night and none of them got ganked. I was kind of wondering that myself. There are a TON of shield ganks but not a single armor gank? I'm sensing a little bit of bias here.
That's because they don't wanna go against those who actually wardecced them. 
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:56:00 -
[202] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote: If this is going to be your claim, then the burden of proof will be upon you to prove it. There are plenty of features in this game that make it worse (in varying degrees) and yet have not been addressed. I never said Incursions would ruin Eve. My hand was actually forced in this particular matter. One member of my corp griefed a handful of logistics running Incursions (SKNK. does not frown upon griefing in corp downtime), and our entire corp was blacklisted and banned from all the decent channels, as well as wardec'd by mercenaries hired by some ambiguous blob from those channels. Now, with the most fluid ISK faucet in the game denied to me, the next most fluid ISK faucet turned out to be killing the largest collection of shiny ships gathered into one hunting ground in the history of the game. What did I have to lose anyways? It turned out to be something like equivalent risk and equivalent rewards to Incursions. This is why we joke that we run Incursions, we just shoot the squares instead of the pluses.
Don't spin it around Andrei, don't give me that. 1 corp member doesn't get his entire corp blacklisted AND wardecced AND hated by incursion runners. If that was the case, we'd have half of EVE blacklisted already. And don't tell me your hand was forced on this and don't put the blame for the actions of your corporation on us. See this from our perspective and one of our goals. To insure the safety and security of incursion runners. When reports suggesting multiple corp members from the same corp are griefing incursion runners then it is only natural and logical to blacklist the entire corp instead of preventing crimes from being repeatedly committed by the same pilots we can PRE-secure. *in b4 the racism and generalization name calling*
If you dislike the actions or the consequences of the actions of your fellow corp members you are free to leave. That's how it is being together with a group of pilots. Each of those pilots will represent the entire group through their actions. The "most fluid isk faucet" is not denied to you. We are denying you access to some channels, no one is saying you can't go and do incursions with your own corp/alliance/blues/friends. Don't be a hypocrite.
Andrei Taganov wrote: Implying that nullsec isn't a pretty serious part of the game? Also, and more specifically, implying that Gallente ships aren't a pretty serious part of the game? Well, until winter I'd partially agree with you there...
You are misunderstanding, probably my fault for the wording (english is not my native language). I am saying that given the choice to pick (a choice of prioritizing) would it be fixing the entire EVE economy / preventing it from collapsing OR something of lesser importance? (Not saying hybrid turrets are not important, but without a working game ecenomy that lays the foundation for almost everything we see in-game I'd say turrets are less prioritized. You don't see a whole department within CCP dedicated to hybrid turrets. That's my point).
And since they are actually trying to change this (supercaps, blasters, ships rebalancing) it is actual of importance to CCP. However you don't see any rebalancing for incursions in the patches, do you? Not saying there won't be a chance of a nerf from CCP on incursions, but everything else has had higher priority. Simply .... if the market was about to fall on its knee due to incursions and other contributing factors we would see radical changes within a short timeperiod. Nothing has been suggested except PLEX manipulation by CCP lately...
I know you're having fun in incursions and I bet it's great, congratz for that and good for you having found a way to enjoy the game. I am not trying to convince you to stop or anything similar. I am simply discussing the whole incursion feature.
PS: I lol'ed at the PLEX being Iceland's national currency.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Razor Blue
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 11:11:00 -
[203] - Quote
If there was no macro ratters or mining bots, then maybe even ice mining could be making equal income to the Incursions. That is the reason why Incursions pay so well: it cannot be botted to oblivion. Its group PVE activity which requires constant human input. And it does have very limited availability.
A valuable lesson that i understood long time ago is not to concern yourselves with other peoples isk/hour. If you do, it will sour the gaming experience very quickly.
If CCP ever nerfs Incursion income, i'll consider it as giant ***** slap in real players face and CCP saying: "We kinda like the $$$ from the botting accounts better." |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 12:41:00 -
[204] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
Don't spin it around Andrei, don't give me that. 1 corp member doesn't get his entire corp blacklisted AND wardecced AND hated by incursion runners. If that was the case, we'd have half of EVE blacklisted already. And don't tell me your hand was forced on this and don't put the blame for the actions of your corporation on us. See this from our perspective and one of our goals. To insure the safety and security of incursion runners. When reports suggesting multiple corp members from the same corp are griefing incursion runners then it is only natural and logical to blacklist the entire corp instead of preventing crimes from being repeatedly committed by the same pilots we can PRE-secure.
In fact, one member did get our entire corp blacklisted AND wardecced by Incursion runners (the by Incursion runners part is secondhand from the mercs that were hired, and told to inform us of the origin of the contract). This is a fact: Slimy Worm griefed Incursions and no one else in our corp was interested because the ISK rewards from his methods of ganking were slim, while the rewards for running the sites were obviously very high. Some of our members even ran Incursions legit while he was ganking. In this you seem to be ill-informed. It was the blacklisting and wardec that kicked our griefing into gear as a corp (because we had nothing left to lose), and eventually led to us becoming quite efficient at both successfully griefing and making ISK doing it. The burden of this campaign rests solely on the shoulders of the (I forget the number in the hundreds that was cited) Incursion runners who chipped in to wardec Slimy Worm's corp, and the person or persons who decided to blacklist our entire corp before thinking about the possible rammifications (even though we had no interest in griefing as a corp prior to that).
Now the part about being hated by Incursion runners is mostly our own badge of honor, because we've earned our infamy through the more than 100 billion ISK we've destroyed (not counting several faction BS ejects and ransoms, unfortunately those guys don't go on our trophy wall).
Admittedly, the part about my hand being forced might be a slight exaggeration, I mean I could have chosen to roll over and let some random dudes that I've never interacted with ban me from the premier Incursion channels, but if you knew me then you'd know that would never happen.
And lol at the part about ensuring the safety of Incursion runners... You guys really messed that up for 187 of those poor souls.
Ammzi wrote:
If you dislike the actions or the consequences of the actions of your fellow corp members you are free to leave. That's how it is being together with a group of pilots. Each of those pilots will represent the entire group through their actions.
I shall refer you to this statement, in your apparent frustration at being grouped with the people who have inflicted this upon the Incursion community.
Ammzi wrote:
Don't be a hypocrite.
Please point out where my actions are not in line with my statements. Otherwise, I will consider this to be arbitrary Ad Hominem as a result of your argumentative impotence.
Ammzi wrote:
You are misunderstanding, probably my fault for the wording (english is not my native language). I am saying that given the choice to pick (a choice of prioritizing) would it be fixing the entire EVE economy / preventing it from collapsing OR something of lesser importance? (Not saying hybrid turrets are not important, but without a working game ecenomy that lays the foundation for almost everything we see in-game I'd say turrets are less prioritized. You don't see a whole department within CCP dedicated to hybrid turrets. That's my point).
And yet we got sitting in stations before the supercap and hybrid turret fixes... Your fallacy is that you presume that CCP have an omniscient view of the needs of the player base. This has clearly been proven to not be the case in many of the recent changes to Eve. Also, again, I never made the assertion that Incursions were actually ruining the game economy. When you quote me, and then reply with unrelated comments that seem to be intended to insinuate a fabricated stance on my behalf, it only reflects poorly upon your argumentative stance.
Ammzi wrote:
And since they are actually trying to change this (supercaps, blasters, ships rebalancing) it is actual of importance to CCP. However you don't see any rebalancing for incursions in the patches, do you? Not saying there won't be a chance of a nerf from CCP on incursions, but everything else has had higher priority. Simply .... if the market was about to fall on its knee due to incursions and other contributing factors we would see radical changes within a short timeperiod. Nothing has been suggested except PLEX manipulation by CCP lately...
Now, if you please, consider the time frames involved in these two situations. Supers have been in Eve for much longer than Incursions have. It has taken supers literally ruining sovereign 0.0 for CCP to address them.
Also, I'll have you know that my primary problem with the effects of Incursions on the economy is my suspicion of their role in the inflation on PLEX prices.
~Andrei. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
287
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 13:01:00 -
[205] - Quote
Andrei Taganovi wrote:Now, if you please, consider the time frames involved in these two situations. Supers have been in Eve for much longer than Incursions have. It has taken supers literally ruining sovereign 0.0 for CCP to address them. This.
If you extrapolate, then you would expect CCP to nerf Incursion income when PLEX costs 3bil ISK and you have 10 fleets competing every single vanguard site because nothing else is worth doing.
Saying "if it was a problem, CCP would fix it!" is retardedly stupid, not least because it is not the priority of CCP at the moment, and neither does the CSM want the change (The Mittani speaks) More so when you consider CCP are doing everything possible to appease the player base at the moment, which includes the several thousand players who grind Incursions all day.
You then top it off by claiming that "100 billion in losses is irrelevant"
So, which is it?
Are Incursions a giant ISK fountain making tens to hundreds of billions lost irrelevant in the face of massive income, or are they balanced?
You can't simultaneously claim both positions. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:22:00 -
[206] - Quote
First a short time line
Slimy worm griefed incursions > Skunkworks was banned from incursion channels > Skunkworks unhappy about this > Skunkworks band together to grief incursions > we found it to be extremely easy, lulzy fun > we declare 60bil challenge > we have hit well over 100bil
Now a list of likely reasons individuals in Skunkworks are doing this, from the biggest reason to the smallest.
Its fun! Its funny! Its actually making us a bunch of isk and getting us free ships! We like finding game mechanics not often used Revenge Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
I hope this helps for future reference.
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 15:58:00 -
[207] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote: In fact, one member did get our entire corp blacklisted AND wardecced by Incursion runners (the by Incursion runners part is secondhand from the mercs that were hired, and told to inform us of the origin of the contract). This is a fact: Slimy Worm griefed Incursions and no one else in our corp was interested because the ISK rewards from his methods of ganking were slim, while the rewards for running the sites were obviously very high.
No, you and I define the term "corp member" differently. Slimy worm and his numerous alts got your corp blacklisted and wardecced by mercenaries that some incursion runners hired. So several corp members that were griefing gave your corp a bad reputation.
Andrei Taganov wrote: And lol at the part about ensuring the safety of Incursion runners... You guys really messed that up for 187 of those poor souls.
If you imply that your campaign is our fault (a direct result of our actions) then I could mention numerous of real life, in-game and moral scenarios that could be explained entirely different with that logic. If you imply that we haven't done enough to help defend pilots ... well we can't help pilots that aren't in our channels. We can't prevent you from creating alts upon alts and alts to infiltrate the channel. Our options are limited.
*post not finished* quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:14:00 -
[208] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote: Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
B - U - L - L - S - H - I - T
Please prove it. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:19:00 -
[209] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote: Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
B - U - L - L - S - H - I - T Please prove it.
thou-t whoest call bull sh*t mustif be thee one to do thee proving
So in other words, you prove its not driving up plex prices, and not making faction sips and mods easyer to obtain |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
288
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:33:00 -
[210] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Gazmin VanBurin wrote: Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
B - U - L - L - S - H - I - T Please prove it.
So far your "evidence" they do NOT have a negative effect, has been "but CCP would fix it!" Now that has been shown as being dumbshit thinking, you're going "No you prove it or it isn't!"
Other arguments of this sort: Global warming. Religion.
Take a basic class on forming an intellectual argument, to be honest, because you're dragging this down to the level of fundamentalist Christians and tinfoil hatters. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
|

Razor Blue
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:37:00 -
[211] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote: Are Incursions a giant ISK fountain making tens to hundreds of billions lost irrelevant in the face of massive income, or are they balanced?
Considering the whole server wide economy, the isk injected through the Incursions is peanuts compared what ratting, anomalies and missions make. Also incursions need group effort, constant input and has very limited availability.
Income from incursions is balanced
Gazmin VanBurin wrote: Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
If there was no incursions, these Incursion runners would be "ruining Eve economy" by generating free minerals through mission loot or whatnot. And about the LP-transfer, incursions generate more isk and less LP while lvl4 generate less isk but more LP and loot. No high sec incursion means people would run lvl4 or null sec anomalies instead. And naturally anomalies and lvl4 generate slightly less income because they can be soloed and require less player effort to complete.
Without incursions, people would be complaining how lvl4 are ruining the economy and how they should be moved to low sec.
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
288
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:38:00 -
[212] - Quote
To state the issue a bit more clearly.
Incursions are, for the most part, pure ISK. 80-120mil of it per hour.
There has never been a PURE ISK source, in highsec, like this before. You can blitz level 4's for 60-80mil an hour, but you're blitzing for LP which has a built in ISK / materials / tags sink.
Fundamentally, the best way of earning ISK in highsec has increased by something like 50% in terms of hourly income AND that income is not tethered to an ISK sink.
That changes things. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Atomik Harmonik
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:48:00 -
[213] - Quote
somebody says Incursions are making too much money, wahhhh
somebody else says; no they're not, wahhhh
So what? have your fun, play the game...who cares what the reason is that Incursions are getting griefed...I sure as hell don't!!!
I want to hear more stories about shiny ships blowing up, not wall after wall of text explaining motivations and debates about the finer points of ISK sinks and tethers. |

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:52:00 -
[214] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:To state the issue a bit more clearly.
Incursions are, for the most part, pure ISK. 80-120mil of it per hour.
There has never been a PURE ISK source, in highsec, like this before. You can blitz level 4's for 60-80mil an hour, but you're blitzing for LP which has a built in ISK / materials / tags sink.
Fundamentally, the best way of earning ISK in highsec has increased by something like 50% in terms of hourly income AND that income is not tethered to an ISK sink.
That changes things.
QFT.
Check out market trends on PLEX since the introduction of incursions as well. Though the recent spike in price could be attributed to butthurt incursionbears not wanting to grind back up to the shiny battleship SKNK. just turned into space glitter. You may say "you don't have that kind of impact" but we've seen 2 month old players time and time again go back to jita and buy a brand new mach/nightmare etc minutes after crying to us about how they just got the ship and we ruined them for life. I wonder how they make up the 1b isk needed to purchase a new shiny ship so fast. The fact that they tell us they are ruined AFTER they are destroyed tells me that they are PLEXing up. SKNK. (and probably CCP) are perfectly OK with this.
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
288
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:55:00 -
[215] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:To state the issue a bit more clearly.
Incursions are, for the most part, pure ISK. 80-120mil of it per hour.
There has never been a PURE ISK source, in highsec, like this before. You can blitz level 4's for 60-80mil an hour, but you're blitzing for LP which has a built in ISK / materials / tags sink.
Fundamentally, the best way of earning ISK in highsec has increased by something like 50% in terms of hourly income AND that income is not tethered to an ISK sink.
That changes things. QFT. Check out market trends on PLEX since the introduction of incursions as well. Though the recent spike in price could be attributed to butthurt incursionbears not wanting to grind back up to the shiny battleship SKNK. just turned into space glitter. You may say "you don't have that kind of impact" but we've seen 2 month old players time and time again go back to jita and buy a brand new mach/nightmare etc minutes after crying to us about how they just got the ship and we ruined them for life. I wonder how they make up the 1b isk needed to purchase a new shiny ship so fast. The fact that they tell us they are ruined AFTER they are destroyed tells me that they are PLEXing up. SKNK. (and probably CCP) are perfectly OK with this.
Look at the volume traded on the Mach and nightmare, also. Weird, huh? Huge surge in demand since Incursions started the 23/7 grind? Weird.
Also look at the price of melted nanoribbons. They've gone up 50% and are on a ******* vertical ramp. I wonder ... could this POSSIBLY be because people have stopped running sleeper sites in a risk present WH for 60-100mil an hour, and are instead doing Incursions risk free?
Indeed. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 17:08:00 -
[216] - Quote
Razor Blue wrote:If there was no macro ratters or mining bots, then maybe even ice mining could be making equal income to the Incursions. That is the reason why Incursions pay so well: it cannot be botted to oblivion. Its group PVE activity which requires constant human input. And it does have very limited availability.
A valuable lesson that i understood long time ago is not to concern yourselves with other peoples isk/hour. If you do, it will sour the gaming experience very quickly.
If CCP ever nerfs Incursion income, i'll consider it as giant ***** slap in real players face and CCP saying: "We kinda like the $$$ from the botting accounts better." The Mittani told me that he's more concerned with L4 mission bots than Incursion income, indicating that he believes they inject more cash into the system than Incursions. I won't argue that as there aren't any real numbers, but I'd certainly agree that mission bots should be dealt with. A dirty fix would be a captcha every 4-5 missions.
Ratting bots should be detectable enough based on their actions.
That doesn't change the fact that the incursioners claim to be putting 30+ billion isk an hour into the economy, with no comparable isk-sink to prevent inflation. If they do even half that number, that's 10 trillion isk a month being spread out across highsec PVE players who spend it on PLEX and shiny ships/mods, steadily driving prices up.
What bothers me about the isk/hour of highsec incursions is that it is equivalent to figures I was seeing working in small wormhole groups. That's really the core problem here: corporations living in nullsec wormholes make the same isk as highsec incursioners, only without the safety and without the CONSTANT availability of isk-producing activities. |

skajit spey
spey clave
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 17:28:00 -
[217] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote: that incursions in high sec pay too damn much. It's basically some of the best money in the game outside of owning a tech moon and therefore all kinds of people are just sitting in highsec doing those, rather than doing something.... ...and so on and so forth.
Now, are these not tears? and are they not delicious? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 17:51:00 -
[218] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: That doesn't change the fact that the incursioners claim to be putting 30+ billion isk an hour into the economy, with no comparable isk-sink to prevent inflation. If they do even half that number, that's 10 trillion isk a month being spread out across highsec PVE players who spend it on PLEX and shiny ships/mods, steadily driving prices up.
You DARE misquote me. I am so outraged that would I have been a normal troll I'd have put this many exclamation marks in:
----> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <----
Here are the https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=229653#post229653 numbers
It's 36,4-38,9 billion isk an hour AT ABSOLUTELY, MEGA, FANTSTIC GIGA ULTRA PEAAAAAK TIME. Get it right before I have to chop it out in dead animal bones and spell it for you on the street. Peak time is the utter peak time of incursion runners INCLUDING the assumption of 3 highsec incursions and extreme crowdness in highsec. Extremely, magically peak time. Estimated to last 20 hours every week.
The weekly average is so much lower! I have done my assumptions and guesstimates. You've pointed your finger at me and said well fine. I have given you the peak number of ISK generation in incursions. Weekly average is probably at 60-70 % of that if not lower. Now you tell me these measly 3.8 trillion ISK generated in highsec. Is that ruining the eve market?
Khanh'rhh. Good on you for failing at math.
Quote: Incursions are, for the most part, pure ISK. 80-120mil of it per hour.
There has never been a PURE ISK source, in highsec, like this before. You can blitz level 4's for 60-80mil an hour, but you're blitzing for LP which has a built in ISK / materials / tags sink.
Fundamentally, the best way of earning ISK in highsec has increased by something like 50% in terms of hourly income AND that income is not tethered to an ISK sink.
How do you add up 50 % and go from 60-80 m an hour in missions to 80-120 m an hour? And no, incursions are NOT for the most part 80-120 m an hour. By all means get a fresh unbanned alt and you try run some incursions and see if you're doing 80-120 m an hour for the most part. And don't start talking about fleets filled with just faction battleships, because that's not "for the most part".
PS: It's so easy to blame "the ruined market and plex prices" on a small percentage of pilots. Of course it's the minority's fault.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 17:52:00 -
[219] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:07:00 -
[220] - Quote
Atomik Harmonik wrote:somebody says Incursions are making too much money, wahhhh
somebody else says; no they're not, wahhhh
So what? have your fun, play the game...who cares what the reason is that Incursions are getting griefed...I sure as hell don't!!!
I want to hear more stories about shiny ships blowing up, not wall after wall of text explaining motivations and debates about the finer points of ISK sinks and tethers.
I agree, we need to get back on topic of crushing incersioners under heel, Ammzl is a very broken record and his argument never changes |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:12:00 -
[221] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:Atomik Harmonik wrote:somebody says Incursions are making too much money, wahhhh
somebody else says; no they're not, wahhhh
So what? have your fun, play the game...who cares what the reason is that Incursions are getting griefed...I sure as hell don't!!!
I want to hear more stories about shiny ships blowing up, not wall after wall of text explaining motivations and debates about the finer points of ISK sinks and tethers. I agree, we need to get back on topic of crushing incersioners under heel, Ammzl is a very broken record and his argument never changes
*successful troll is successful* \o/ quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:15:00 -
[222] - Quote
Wait, there was a point? I thought it got lost after like 8 pages of economic epeen measuring. |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:24:00 -
[223] - Quote
Ammzi wrote: *successful troll is successful* \o/
Cool story Bro
why dont you try incursion griefing next, its even more refreshing |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 19:24:00 -
[224] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:You DARE misquote me. I am so outraged that would I have been a normal troll I'd have put this many exclamation marks in: ----> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <---- Here are the https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=229653#post229653 numbers It's 36,4-38,9 billion isk an hour AT ABSOLUTELY, MEGA, FANTSTIC GIGA ULTRA PEAAAAAK TIME. Get it right before I have to chop it out in dead animal bones and spell it for you on the street. Peak time is the utter peak time of incursion runners INCLUDING the assumption of 3 highsec incursions and extreme crowdness in highsec. Extremely, magically peak time. Estimated to last 20 hours every week. The weekly average is so much lower! umad? 
You ignore my repeated point that the issue isn't just the quantity of isk they make, it's that they make as much as riskier group activities in nullsec. Nullsec operations have natural isk-sinks. Again: NO COMPARABLE ISK SINK. They put isk into the market with little risk of anything being lost. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 19:36:00 -
[225] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Ammzi wrote:You DARE misquote me. I am so outraged that would I have been a normal troll I'd have put this many exclamation marks in: ----> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <---- Here are the https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=229653#post229653 numbers It's 36,4-38,9 billion isk an hour AT ABSOLUTELY, MEGA, FANTSTIC GIGA ULTRA PEAAAAAK TIME. Get it right before I have to chop it out in dead animal bones and spell it for you on the street. Peak time is the utter peak time of incursion runners INCLUDING the assumption of 3 highsec incursions and extreme crowdness in highsec. Extremely, magically peak time. Estimated to last 20 hours every week. The weekly average is so much lower! umad?  You ignore my repeated point that the issue isn't just the quantity of isk they make, it's that they make as much as riskier group activities in nullsec. Nullsec operations have natural isk-sinks. Again: NO COMPARABLE ISK SINK. They put isk into the market with little risk of anything being lost.
It does have an ISK sink, not very large one though. But for every LP generated and spend 1 ISK is "sunk". (concord LP that is, it's different with the customs offices though).
Why do you never talk about incursions in nullsec? They pay out almost double of highsec incursions. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Solomar Espersei
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
110
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 19:49:00 -
[226] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:[quote=Razor Blue]...L4 mission bots than Incursion income, indicating that he believes they inject more cash into the system than Incursions. I won't argue that as there aren't any real numbers, but I'd certainly agree that mission bots should be dealt with. A dirty fix would be a captcha every 4-5 missions.
Oh, they will be. Our minions in CCP are hard at work on a new weapon to fight the Mission Runner Scourge. A storm is a' brewing lads and the farmers in the Umokka/Ruvas Bot Heaven will soon feel its righteous wrath.

Recruiting is OPEN Please join our public channel The Ninja Dojo for more info |

Razor Blue
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 21:01:00 -
[227] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:To state the issue a bit more clearly.
Incursions are, for the most part, pure ISK. 80-120mil of it per hour.
There has never been a PURE ISK source, in highsec, like this before. You can blitz level 4's for 60-80mil an hour, but you're blitzing for LP which has a built in ISK / materials / tags sink.
Fundamentally, the best way of earning ISK in highsec has increased by something like 50% in terms of hourly income AND that income is not tethered to an ISK sink.
That changes things.
First, it is only a good thing that incursion sanshas are pure isk faucet and not a mineral faucet too.
Second, Concord LP store is isk sink too. 250mil for 6% implant. 150mil for 5run BPC. Personally i have spent nearly 1,5b isk in it. From Vanguards the LP payout is 1400, so if that LP is spend in Concord store, 1,4mil isk is sunk per site. Or the LP can be exchanged but that would result 20% loss. A good fleet would result roughly 10k exchanged LP / hour.
People just keep on raging how incursions can make 100-120mil isk per hour, but completely disregard how easily and fast those numbers starts to dive. A bit overcrowded system, looking for replacement, lose a contested site, one player needs cat feeding afk and.... BAM!! Your isk/hour has suddently crashed on par with lvl4 missions or anomalys.
Lastly, if you can get together 7-8 faction fit pirate bs and 3 logistics, you are damn sure to be very effective in whatever you decide to do, yes? |

boooooosso
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 21:16:00 -
[228] - Quote
OM I just saw this on Youtube. Funny **** ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwA--gnZWDA&feature=youtu.be
OMG, I'm going to be following this **** from now on. Guy in corp linked it. This is awesome. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 21:25:00 -
[229] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Why do you never talk about incursions in nullsec?  They pay out almost double of highsec incursions.
Because lowsec and nullsec incursions have natural risk associated with them, the same as wormholes. It's entirely possible for a PVP fleet to show and up ruin the incursion fleets' day without fear of concord.
Let me make this clear: I have absolutely no problem with the incursion content. On the contrary, I think it's brilliant. My problem is that the payout of highsec incursions does not reflect the safety afforded to players. Remove the concord protection and we wouldn't be having this conversation. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
269
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 21:27:00 -
[230] - Quote
There will be more videos soon. I have about two hours of footage, including more of Odemis' singing squirrel ransoms. It's just a matter of finding the time to edit. |
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 21:45:00 -
[231] - Quote
Oh lol .... Floppie we agree then, almost  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

kiki mo
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:02:00 -
[232] - Quote
good
can we lock this thread now? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:16:00 -
[233] - Quote
kiki mo wrote:good
can we lock this thread now?
Huh, .. but why? quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
270
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:47:00 -
[234] - Quote
kiki mo wrote:good
can we lock this thread now? But there are still funnies to be made! |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:53:00 -
[235] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
No, you and I define the term "corp member" differently. Slimy worm and his numerous alts got your corp blacklisted and wardecced by mercenaries that some incursion runners hired. So several corp members that were griefing gave your corp a bad reputation.
Just the facts. Slimy Worm is only one man, and only one member of SKNK.
Ammzi wrote:
Our options are limited.
Mine were too, welcome to the club.
Ammzi wrote:
...Says he should have called me a "crybaby" instead of a "hypocrite" after being called out for Ad Hominem (quite civilly, I might add), accuses me of "QQ" ing, and then refuses to respond to more of my post that contains relevant comparisons and analysis of the situation he claims to be so interested in clearing the air about because I'm calling names!...
You, sir, are clearly trolling (I should have listened the first time I said that). As such, I hope you will pardon me if I excuse myself from any further attempts to feed you.
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 22:59:00 -
[236] - Quote
Yes! The first video is finally up! After watching that, I can't imagine anyone thinking that what we're actually doing should be stopped...
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 23:00:00 -
[237] - Quote
kiki mo wrote:good
can we lock this thread now?
You could just stop clicking it.
~Andrei. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 23:14:00 -
[238] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:
You, sir, are clearly trolling (I should have listened the first time I said that). As such, I hope you will pardon me if I excuse myself from any further attempts to feed you.
~Andrei.
*tucks napkin* Oh well, there's other places to be fed. Au revoir!
PS: Did you see the new videos from SISI? Turret fire that "miss" a ship will actually VISUALLY miss ships now!!! Speed tanking buff x 1000 quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

TheMcNaughty
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 03:58:00 -
[239] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
*tucks napkin* Oh well, there's other places to be fed. Au revoir!
Oh thank God... |

carmelos53
OMG totally awesome corp of one
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 04:49:00 -
[240] - Quote
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
You guys are just a bunch of kids. Maybe some ice cream will cheer slimy worm and his friends up. The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group. If you didn't like the opinions of others hurting your "good name" maybe being dochebags in the first place wasn't the best option.
Please go tell your parents maybe they will care. |
|

Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:13:00 -
[241] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
You guys are just a bunch of kids. Maybe some ice cream will cheer slimy worm and his friends up. The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group. If you didn't like the opinions of others hurting your "good name" maybe being dochebags in the first place wasn't the best option.
Please go tell your parents maybe they will care.
Once again, if the Incursion bears don't like the opinions of others hurting their "good name" (by wardecing us and banning us), then maybe they should find another thing to do.
I'm not feeling hurt, I'm feeling rich and smug. It's to the point that we're whatever about killing faction battleships that don't have shiny fits... We're like jaded by the easy ISK, just like you bears are!
~Andrei. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:57:00 -
[242] - Quote
The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun. |

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts.
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 06:25:00 -
[243] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
You guys are just a bunch of kids. Maybe some ice cream will cheer slimy worm and his friends up. The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group. If you didn't like the opinions of others hurting your "good name" maybe being dochebags in the first place wasn't the best option.
Please go tell your parents maybe they will care.
This is funny because you put emphasis on "channel banned" like it means something. Also, I'm pretty sure you misunderstand the tears coming out of this thread. You may have missed how this story originated and I'm not going to recap for you. Suffice to say, I'm pretty sure The Skunkworks crew and associates are having a blast in this facet of total destruction. I'm quite jealous. |

TheMcNaughty
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 14:48:00 -
[244] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.
^This. A thousand times over... |

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 14:57:00 -
[245] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
I think your misinterpreting an excuse to ruin our good incursioning names and getting amazing kills, for heart filled sorrow.
Trust me, no one in Skunkworks is sad over our faction ship slaughter. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
272
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:23:00 -
[246] - Quote
carmelos53 wrote:It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
Carebear doesn't know what tears are.
You paid for a war with the Skunkworks. We're giving you what you paid for. Spin it however you need so that you can feel like a big boy, it was the actions of incursioners that got things to this point.
carmelos53 wrote:The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group.. Because you can judge an entire group of people by the actions of one. That mentality works so well in real life, let's extend it to Eve! |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 00:19:00 -
[247] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun. Odd, so what your saying is that your shooting NPC characters? Who is carebear now? If it can't fight back on even terms, its an easy win and no challenge for you, amirite? You cannot loose, therefore you paint yourself with your own logical brush but use the excuse "But it has a PC nametag instead of NPC Gist Saint, therefore it has better value for a pointless argument and I am right your wrong so just die to my guns."
PVP > PVE > NPC when it comes to the food chain and how ships are fit, though sometimes the NPC might win to the PVE but the PVE will never win to the PVP. Its because of different fitting that a PVP ship will always win, incursion fit ships might be able to counter a proper fit PVP ship all you got to do is blowup/off/rimjob the logi ship and it cascade fails from there cause Sansha ships have more DPS then your gang.
Would be awesomely funny if CCP made incursions more risk free like turning them into instances so you couldn't touch the vaulable pinata's you want to bag. The rage and bitter tears that flood the forums is just intoxicating how so many people think its unfair at the amount of isk it prints, when its obviously a good idea.
1. CCP makes incursions in highsec very "risk free" 2. Carebear those wallets into heaven 3. Nobody really wants to sell a plex for 300m 4. ??? 5. PROFIT!!!! Carebears have excess isk to burn, more demand for PLEX, PLEX market shrinks from high demand (Elmo dolls way back come to mind) instead of high volumes low demand dropping the price of plex, sellers are happy they are making better isk themselves from plex cause they don't want to earn it themselves and CCP of all things is seeing more PLEX being bought from their website.
Still cannot figure out why they didn't turn those sanctums back on yet  |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 01:02:00 -
[248] - Quote
What the **** is the poster above me talking about? Did you actually think that through? What, is that Soraya person from the God Squad giving lessons in poor posting? |

PlayerName
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 02:48:00 -
[249] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.
Quoted for truth.
Aqriue wrote:Would be awesomely funny if CCP made incursions more risk free like turning them into instances so you couldn't touch the vaulable pinata's you want to bag. The rage and bitter tears that flood the forums is just intoxicating how so many people think its unfair at the amount of isk it prints, when its obviously a good idea.
Not sure if trolling or just stupid. My guess is just stupid.
I have some advice you should heed: It's better to remain silent and appear stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Please try to remember this next time you decide to waste our time (and yours) with such a terrible, incoherent post. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
41
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 04:42:00 -
[250] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:First a short time line
Slimy worm griefed incursions > Skunkworks was banned from incursion channels > Skunkworks unhappy about this > Skunkworks band together to grief incursions > we found it to be extremely easy, lulzy fun > we declare 60bil challenge > we have hit well over 100bil
Now a list of likely reasons individuals in Skunkworks are doing this, from the biggest reason to the smallest.
Its fun! Its funny! Its actually making us a bunch of isk and getting us free ships! We like finding game mechanics not often used Revenge Incursions are ruining EvEGÇÖs market
I hope this helps for future reference.
Slimy worm griefed incursions > Skunkworks was banned from incursion channels >incursion community hires God Squard to dec Skunkworks > Skunkworks unhappy about this > Skunkworks band together to grief incursions > we found it to be extremely easy, lulzy fun > we declare 60bil challenge > we have hit well over 100bil
you forgot that they attacked us :) |
|

Rengas
AQUILA INC
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 06:48:00 -
[251] - Quote
The thread that keeps on giving <3 |

disillusional
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 07:50:00 -
[252] - Quote
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:carmelos53 wrote:It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---
I think your misinterpreting an excuse to ruin our good incursioning names and getting amazing kills, for heart filled sorrow. Trust me, no one in Skunkworks is sad over our faction ship slaughter.
Quoted for glorious truths |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
880
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 08:01:00 -
[253] - Quote
This thread is amazing. Never stop messing with the forces of ~elite PvE~ The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

JackBlasta
Genesis Nation Gentlemen's Agreement
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 09:30:00 -
[254] - Quote
The best way to get highsec incursion bear tears is for large entity such as goons to form a large fleet, & go around completing the mom sties in each empire incursion as soon as they appear  |

proxwar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:31:00 -
[255] - Quote
http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1
1-0 to the high sec incursionbears.
Love CCP.
Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on 
|

Rythm
True Power Team
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 11:54:00 -
[256] - Quote
proxwar wrote:http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1 1-0 to the high sec incursionbears. Love CCP. Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on  Alliance P .... |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:36:00 -
[257] - Quote
proxwar wrote:http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1 1-0 to the high sec incursionbears. Love CCP. Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on 
More like incursionbears: 1 and Skunkworks: 120b.
Also, that kinda sucks for us, but we were doing so well that CCP had to change the whole game for the dozen or so of us.
I wonder if this will effect neutral logi all in all. Nice response time, CCP. I would have left it as ~ emergent gameplay~ until incursions had some sort of other balancing factor, but v0v.
Fellow Skunks, I'd like to reiterate that you've done incredibly good work being so awesome that CCP had to weigh you down Harrison Bergeron-style. I'm incredibly proud of what we've done. Now let's go back to the lab and see what other highly clever **** we can do next. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
105
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:07:00 -
[258] - Quote
For those who didn't follow the link
Quote:A part of the next client update will feature a change to aggression mechanics in high security space.
To benefit the EVE community at large, a small change has been made to game mechanics regarding criminal flags and how they are inherited in high security space. If a pilot is remote repairing, or otherwise assisting, another pilot who commits a criminal act then the repair module will now disengage. In order to continue repairs the module will need to be restarted and a message will appear warning of the criminal flag and possible consequences.
CCP just took the big nerf hammer and smashed Skunkworks and co. down underground. I am honestly surprised by this  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
289
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:14:00 -
[259] - Quote
None of you know the difference between "criminal flagging" and passed on aggression, then?
A while back, CCP made it IMPOSSIBLE to rep someone who was criminally flagged, due to the CONCORDOKKEN greifing in Incursion sites. This ****** up FW and lowsec, since you couldn't rep someone who had a GCC timer (the criminal flag....)
It is now possible to do so again, only now with a warning.
i.e. CCP have fixed the half assed nerf.
What the Skunkworks were doing will still throw up no warning. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
105
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:20:00 -
[260] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:None of you know the difference between "criminal flagging" and passed on aggression, then?
A while back, CCP made it IMPOSSIBLE to rep someone who was criminally flagged, due to the CONCORDOKKEN greifing in Incursion sites. This ****** up FW and lowsec, since you couldn't rep someone who had a GCC timer (the criminal flag....)
It is now possible to do so again, only now with a warning.
i.e. CCP have fixed the half assed nerf.
What the Skunkworks were doing will still throw up no warning.
EDIT: unless CCP don't know their own terminology, of course. Lazy patch notes.
you fail so bad ... quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:27:00 -
[261] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:None of you know the difference between "criminal flagging" and passed on aggression, then?
A while back, CCP made it IMPOSSIBLE to rep someone who was criminally flagged, due to the CONCORDOKKEN greifing in Incursion sites. This ****** up FW and lowsec, since you couldn't rep someone who had a GCC timer (the criminal flag....)
It is now possible to do so again, only now with a warning.
i.e. CCP have fixed the half assed nerf.
What the Skunkworks were doing will still throw up no warning.
EDIT: unless CCP don't know their own terminology, of course. Lazy patch notes. What you mean is GLOBAL criminal flag. l2criminalaggressionsystem. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
289
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:32:00 -
[262] - Quote
This is why I don't :highsec:
Or maybe I just wanted to think it wasn't true?
: / - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Rengas
AQUILA INC
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:42:00 -
[263] - Quote
Sincere congratulations for being so successful that CCP had no choice but to nerf you!
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 16:49:00 -
[264] - Quote
Wait, hang on. WAAAIT
Directly from TQ
Quote:CONCORDs automatic safety algorithm embedded in your Large 'Solace' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction has decided to shut down to avoid involvement with the criminal shenanigans of Marhaba. Manual override is required to resume operations.
I haven't tried with normal aggression yet. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Lakshata Chawla
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:20:00 -
[265] - Quote
So people like me that press F1-F4 all at the same time will still get killed XD |

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:51:00 -
[266] - Quote
CCP has trolled you all good this time.. honestly I give it 8/10. Yes.. I did say "you" as in you incursionbears. |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:57:00 -
[267] - Quote
Rengas wrote:Sincere congratulations for being so successful that CCP had no choice but to nerf you!
+1 I like Lofty. |

Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:41:00 -
[268] - Quote
PlayerName wrote: Not sure if trolling or just stupid. My guess is just stupid.
I have some advice you should heed: It's better to remain silent and appear stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Please try to remember this next time you decide to waste our time (and yours) with such a terrible, incoherent post. Nope, trolling stupid like you who thinks everything needs risk or its unfair. The Did you read this mornings patch? It just got harder to gank logistics by flipping a can and using an alt of yours that needs to be repped so you can warp in and gank it, it gives to the logistic a warning. CONCORD ganking removing insurance as well. At best, all you guys saying there is no risk for highsec incursions will keep on getting pissed off and go shoot the statue in Jita while CCP is seeing what the hell are guys with billions in isk from incurions going to do? Obviously buy PLEX with isk, as the price keeps going up because the supply is so low (where you can set the price you want, instead of keep dropping the price with high competition from market traders as the supply of PLEX gets bigger and demand less so). More plex at higher price, more people buying PLEX from CCP with cash to trade for isk. More cash for CCP, you can see where CCP is going in this direction. Coddle the player base, make them feel secure, more willing to spend cash in CCP's form of micro transaction. |

proxwar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 18:55:00 -
[269] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Wait, hang on. WAAAIT Directly from TQ Quote:CONCORDs automatic safety algorithm embedded in your Large 'Solace' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction has decided to shut down to avoid involvement with the criminal shenanigans of Marhaba. Manual override is required to resume operations. I haven't tried with normal aggression yet. edit: Ok, so I had a reaper pick up a can while I was repping him. The repper continued without stop/warning and without transferring aggression. However when I started a second repper I got promped by a warning: Quote:17:04:50 Question Proceeding with this action will aid your target who has enemies present, the activation will be considered an aggression towards your targets enemies. You will be flagged as a criminal towards his enemies for up to 15 minutes from your last aiding activation. Are you sure you want to activate this module on Marhaba? But before I had chosen "yes or no" I had already received the aggro. This is not a nerf, this is a buff to incursion griefers xD __________________ edit2: Trying this with another scenario. My alt canflipped a can and got aggro towards some random pilot. I activated my reps on my alt and I got promped by a warning about aggression, enemies, etc. etc. Meaning pilots who will initiate reps on an aggroed pilot WILL receive a warning! I think what I experienced in the first edit is a bug .... exploitable one in my opinion. ________________ edit3: Ok, tried the same thing again. Reps on shuttle, shuttle can flips and my repper is still running. If I engage any of the other reps I get a warning and NO aggro is transferred! Strange thing that happened ... along the line my logistic got aggro against the pilot it was repping, because the pilot the shuttle had gained aggro against shot the shuttle..... not working as intended? I am very confused how this make sense, but yes. CCP has nerfed incursion griefers. PS: When the pilot shot the shuttle I was repping, reps turned off and I got this warning. Quote:17:38:54 Info CONCORDs automatic safety algorithm embedded in your Large 'Solace' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction has decided to shut down to avoid involvement with the criminal shenanigans of Mishna Khardula. Manual override is required to resume operations. _______________ edit4: I am starting to get gray hair. A cap transfer was running to the shuttle pilot while he was can flipping. After can flipping it kept running and no aggro was transferred. While trying to engage second cap xfer it gave off warning. After disengaging the cap xfer and then turning on armor repper there was NO warning and aggro was received immediately. 
So, breaking it down....
If your reps/transfers cycle is already activated on griefer, and the griefer gets aggression mid cycle it does NOT auto transfer to the logi due to it being already activated. But any mod activated after that time will get the pop up warning?
Did i get that right?
|

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 19:08:00 -
[270] - Quote
proxwar wrote: So, breaking it down....
If your reps/transfers cycle is already activated on griefer, and the griefer gets aggression mid cycle it does NOT auto transfer to the logi due to it being already activated. But any mod activated after that time will get the pop up warning?
Did i get that right?
Yep, pretty much. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

proxwar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 19:12:00 -
[271] - Quote
Awesome.
So CCP really does love incursioners then. <3
LOL at Skunkworks, but credit where its due. Not everyday a company changes its game mechanics for 40K+ players due to the actions of so few. Got to be some kind of medal made for such an accoumplishment 
New motto for you skunkguys -
"Never was so much owed by so many to so few" - Churchill |

Khors
El Barco Pirata
14
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:00:00 -
[272] - Quote
Best you can do now is finnish the highsec incursions as fast as possible. I hear people are very upset when they don't get to farm the vanguards. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:01:00 -
[273] - Quote
Khors wrote:Best you can do now is finnish the highsec incursions as fast as possible. I hear people are very upset when they don't get to farm the vanguards.
*punches Khors* Don't give 'em good ideas. lol .... quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:12:00 -
[274] - Quote
Don't worry. We'd already given it some thought. We don't have the manpower to close the incursions the normal way, but we've been looking into what actually has to be done to close the site. We're trying to determine if it's actually killing the site or if we can start a despawn timer or do something specific like that.
If we can't do that there's still a plan to do with the mom sites and I'm pretty stoked about. |

Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:16:00 -
[275] - Quote
Alternatively you can suicide jam the logistics using insured scorp blob because they don't fit ECCM on them for incursions Shouldn't take too long for everything to go pop. |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:19:00 -
[276] - Quote
Oh yeah, there's lots on the table for us to use. We were going to wait until the incursion bears started getting smart enough to avoid our previous thing before we used them, but there's a couple options that need to be fully fleshed out, to be sure. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
282
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:42:00 -
[277] - Quote
Unfortunately the patch is going to force me to skip what was the NEXT step, but Monk's right: we have a lot of plans on the table. This was the low-hanging fruit, that's all. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 21:51:00 -
[278] - Quote
Jack Tronic wrote:Alternatively you can suicide jam the logistics using insured scorp blob because they don't fit ECCM on them for incursions Shouldn't take too long for everything to go pop.
Blizzard is removing insurance from ships destroyed by CONCORD and we'd only get at most 10 seconds of jamming per Scorpion per logistics (or maybe per 2 logistics, we haven't done the maths yet). We'd need at least a minute of jammed logis to kill anything. When I started incursion griefing I'd tackle the logis at the acceleration gate while the fleet warped in logiless and I'd usually only kill one or two ships.
But we've already shown just how easy it is for a handful of people to get Blizzard to change the game, so we might just try to manipulate them into making such a carebearish change that there's massive desubs and Eve dies. Maybe once we start killing incursionbears again we can get Blizzard to remove ship losses involving NPC's even if they're PvP-related losses. |

Neeb Neeb Nanu
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 22:17:00 -
[279] - Quote
Keep up the good work gents.
While there is a will there will always be a way.
Incursions fatten too many wallets.
|

foxnod
Brotherhood of the Coast
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 02:25:00 -
[280] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:Jack Tronic wrote:Alternatively you can suicide jam the logistics using insured scorp blob because they don't fit ECCM on them for incursions Shouldn't take too long for everything to go pop. Blizzard is removing insurance from ships destroyed by CONCORD and we'd only get at most 10 seconds of jamming per Scorpion per logistics (or maybe per 2 logistics, we haven't done the maths yet). We'd need at least a minute of jammed logis to kill anything. When I started incursion griefing I'd tackle the logis at the acceleration gate while the fleet warped in logiless and I'd usually only kill one or two ships. But we've already shown just how easy it is for a handful of people to get Blizzard to change the game, so we might just try to manipulate them into making such a carebearish change that there's massive desubs and Eve dies. Maybe once we start killing incursionbears again we can get Blizzard to remove ship losses involving NPC's even if they're PvP-related losses.
You guys are truly saints. Eve needs more people like you. |
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 02:50:00 -
[281] - Quote
proxwar wrote:Awesome. So CCP really does love incursioners then. <3 LOL at Skunkworks, but credit where its due. Not everyday a company changes its game mechanics for 40K+ players due to the actions of so few. Got to be some kind of medal made for such an accoumplishment  New motto for you skunkguys - "Never was so much owed by so many to so few" - Churchill
It's the abuse principle at work, as usual.
For many years if you were repping someone who did a criminal act, you got the Concord right up the poop chute. CCP did nothing to change that.
Evidently there were reasons to keep it, and I remember seeing the occasional lolthread right here in C&P about how they manage to get someone with a faction fit to put a repper on, etc etc.
That was not enough really to change anything. It was good enough to accept the usual concepts: watch who you deal with, watch who you rep, EvE is harsh. WOW is that way, etc etc add nausea
But you see what happens when people go out of their way to use a specific mechanic for no other reason than to cheese other players?
"EvE is a sandbox!!!1!!!" say the griefbears (or very prolific salvagers we must consider) but once again, someone took the pale and shovel and hit the other kids over the head with it one too many times, and here comes mommy to take it away.
You see, mommy puts the kids in the sandbox and wants them to stay where so she can get other things done but it one kid takes that pale and shovel and runs off the others with it, she's got her hands full.
CCP is mommy and we are the kids, but we are not going to wander about the playground, we will find other games to play. And the CCP Mom is a business that relies on subscriptions (because it sure as heck can't use microtransactions) to pay the bills.
If you like things the way they are, then don't single out one game mechanic and exploit the hell out of it for objectives that have more to do with "invoking tears" and less to do with the kinds of goals one could have in a spaceship game. This is what happens.
Now, as we all like to say in these forums, for those of you who don't like the changes: deal with it.
|

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:16:00 -
[282] - Quote
Griefers and other "hardcore" players who like the dark, dangerous world of Eve have already started leaving.
We haven't been replaced by carebears because Eve's PvE content sucks.
This is what happens 99% of the time when a niche game tries to go mainstream. Eve will die completely because CCP decided to idiot-proof and carebear-proof everything, roughly starting with the contract changes.
Nerfing incursion griefing and banning recruitments scams wasn't the first thing they did along this line and it won't be the last. |

ElCholo
BURN EDEN Northern Coalition.
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:28:00 -
[283] - Quote
This latest nerf from CCP reminded me of a quote from Winston Churchill GÇ£This is not the end. This is not the beginning of the end. It is the end of the beginningGÇ¥ |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 05:31:00 -
[284] - Quote
ElCholo wrote:This latest nerf from CCP reminded me of a quote from Winston Churchill GÇ£This is not the end. This is not the beginning of the end. It is the end of the beginningGÇ¥
It's more like we just climaxed and were just starting to cuddle and get ready for another round but then the building's fire alarm went off. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 06:52:00 -
[285] - Quote
... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei. |

TheMcNaughty
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 07:24:00 -
[286] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei.
Amen... |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
45
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 07:24:00 -
[287] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei.
actually now that the cat's out of the bag monk and i signed a secret peace treaty with tdf |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 08:45:00 -
[288] - Quote
Mythen took the news so badly that he can't see or stand up and had to go to the hospital.
I'm actually not kidding. He's in the hospital. |

Sutskop
PILSGESCHWADER Monkey Circus
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 09:06:00 -
[289] - Quote
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote: time when a niche game tries to go mainstream. Eve will die completely because CCP decided to idiot-proof and carebear-proof everything, roughly starting with the contract changes.
EVE is dead? Again? I for one welcome changes to remove (or at least warn of) invisible aggro mumbojumbo. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
289
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 09:49:00 -
[290] - Quote
Sutskop wrote:Moustached Slimy Worm wrote: time when a niche game tries to go mainstream. Eve will die completely because CCP decided to idiot-proof and carebear-proof everything, roughly starting with the contract changes. EVE is dead? Again? I for one welcome changes to remove (or at least warn of) invisible aggro mumbojumbo. Because doing 30 seconds research on the guy who you're trusting to rep your faction battleship is too much work.
This change only helps dribbling idiots. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
|

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
49
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 09:56:00 -
[291] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
This change only helps dribbling idiots.
Quoting for truth. Being stupid is apparently buffable. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:55:00 -
[292] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Because doing 30 seconds research on the guy who you're trusting to rep your faction battleship is too much work.
This change only helps dribbling idiots.
^This. Plenty of bears managed to, one way or another, figure out that our fleets and demands weren't on the up and up during our little Incursion crashing party. To those guys, we usually said "Fly safe o/" and got back to the mouth breathers that wanted to lose their ships. Plenty of them had strange ghost story related reasons to not play with us, but they still lucked into the right answer with just a little thought. The other guys were simply being careless with their space-stuff. There's no excuse for that in this game, and there has traditionally been little refuge from having to think in this game--and let's face it, that's what keeps the people who actually do stuff in this game around.
I just hope that now CCP can fix the other problem with RR mechanics in game: neut RR station games not aggressing logi ships. With this change out of the way, I don't see any remaining excuses for CCP not to go ahead and fix the thing that players have been begging for them to fix for years now.
I guess we'll see how it turns out...
~Andrei. |

Aine Ni
Suicide Ganger
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:10:00 -
[293] - Quote
Griefer tears - how sweet  |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:17:00 -
[294] - Quote
Aine Ni wrote:Griefer tears - how sweet 
When I see your posts, I read "Suicide Ginger." That would have made for a much cooler package with your ginger avatar and all.
Just sayin'.
~Andrei. |

Aine Ni
Suicide Ganger
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:22:00 -
[295] - Quote
Suicide Ginger - Not bad - A play on both my corp name AND hair colour. 
FYI - It's Ganger and not Ganker - Just to save you, to post one more play on words  |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
62
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:27:00 -
[296] - Quote
Aine Ni wrote:Suicide Ginger - Not bad - A play on both my corp name AND hair colour.  FYI - It's Ganger and not Ganker - Just to save you, to post one more play on words 
Yeah, it's the confusion of it not being ganker that gets me to thinking ginger...
~Andrei. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:10:00 -
[297] - Quote
*gurgle gurgle*
Guys, STOP QQ'ING!! I am drowning in tears over here.
*puts on goggles and swims away* quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:23:00 -
[298] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei.
If you have a penchant for affecting people's lives, you should consider some volunteer work.
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:24:00 -
[299] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:
This change only helps dribbling idiots.
Quoting for truth. Being stupid is apparently buffable.
You may well be correct but if we wanted to watch stupidity get taken advantage of by sociopaths we could tune into C-SPAN and watch our own congressional and senate hearings live.
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
291
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:37:00 -
[300] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:*gurgle gurgle*
Guys, STOP QQ'ING!! I am drowning in tears over here.
*puts on goggles and swims away*
Point out the "tears" please?
We're discussing how game mechanics have been changed, that seemingly only benefit people too stupid to protect themselves.
The problem with you bears, is you actually have no idea what "tears" look like, and seem to think going "LOL TEARS!!" when someone points out an issue is the same thing. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
|

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:40:00 -
[301] - Quote
Would one of the Incursion griefers mind clarifying something for me?
Before the latest change, did the logi pilots get a pop-up warning when they started rr'ing someone who had can-flipped a few minutes previously or no?
Thanks. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
291
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:45:00 -
[302] - Quote
AkJon Ferguson wrote:Would one of the Incursion griefers mind clarifying something for me?
Before the latest change, did the logi pilots get a pop-up warning when they started rr'ing someone who had can-flipped a few minutes previously or no?
Thanks. They did not. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:47:00 -
[303] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Ammzi wrote:*gurgle gurgle*
Guys, STOP QQ'ING!! I am drowning in tears over here.
*puts on goggles and swims away* Point out the "tears" please? We're discussing how game mechanics have been changed, that seemingly only benefit people too stupid to protect themselves. The problem with you bears, is you actually have no idea what "tears" look like, and seem to think going "LOL TEARS!!" when someone points out an issue is the same thing.
*a peaceful bump was heard when the lifeless body of Ammzi hit the ocean bottom. An ocean created by the vast amount of griefer tears that CCP had demanded* quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
291
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 17:23:00 -
[304] - Quote
Congratulations.
Your counter argument was cutting, incisive, and offered a new perspective on the issue which blew mine out of the water.
+1 rep gf gf - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 19:15:00 -
[305] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei.
I suppose you have to find some gratification somewhere for playing the game like an asshat, lol.
Shame that you and your compatriots continually seem to contradict this claim of achievement by trying to undermine it having a presence in the game, even with it being so insignificant a change.
But there again I suppose I have to conclude its simply a double standard of simplistic propoganda designed to convince us that all is well else you wouldn't need to have to present it in such a way.
So much stupid fail, lol. Please can I be an incursion griefer "loser" also? |

Rengas
AQUILA INC
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 19:29:00 -
[306] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:Andrei Taganov wrote:... And thus the legacy of The Skunkworks was carved into stone by CCP. Never before, and never again, shall anyone gather so many tears in so short a time as we have here. Our influence was so great that a game mechanic had to be changed with more haste than that of so many other currently defunct game issues. Because of the combined effort of about a dozen of us, for a mere two weeks, there is now a pop-up in Eve (ever so slightly altering the game experience for literally thousands of players), and some CCP devs were able to prove their importance in a time of such questionable employment at CCP by scurrying to code a fix to our assault on their precious carebear population.
I, for one, am quite proud of what my brothers and I have achieved here, and now no one can take the crown from us.
We'll see you bears around, and we won't be any more diplomatic than we were in these last two weeks.
~Andrei. I suppose you have to find some gratification somewhere for playing the game like an asshat, lol. Shame that you and your compatriots continually seem to contradict this claim of achievement by trying to undermine it having a presence in the game, even with it being so insignificant a change. But there again I suppose I have to conclude its simply a double standard of simplistic propoganda designed to convince us that all is well else you wouldn't need to have to present it in such a way. So much stupid fail, lol. Please can I be an incursion griefer "loser" also?
Is there any way to Dislike a post?
|

Lakshata Chawla
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 19:32:00 -
[307] - Quote
I do believe that the way you guys killed people was an exploit, since you get a warning for almost every other attempted act of aggression.
I do agree it only affected the first few people, and the profoundly dumb. |

Solomar Espersei
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
115
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 19:49:00 -
[308] - Quote
Lakshata Chawla wrote:I do believe that the way you guys killed people was an exploit, since you get a warning for almost every other attempted act of aggression.
I do agree it only affected the first few people, and the profoundly dumb.
I don't know man, seems like every time the griefing crowd assplodes some hapless victim, someone screams "exploit", yet when we're on the receiving end of said explosions, it's GF, GF. OTOH, if something is only affecting "the profoundly dumb" you would think most folks in New Eden wouldn't have any issues with that. Just food for thought. Now back to the Happy Land of easy Vanguard ISKies with you lot. Recruiting is OPEN Please join our public channel The Ninja Dojo for more info |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
115
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 20:55:00 -
[309] - Quote
If they were attacking Incursion runners out of protest for incursions being easy ISK faucets I would have agreed with them. In fact I was in an alliance that was partly RP and all about fighting back Sansha and I run into others who were in that alliance but won't touch an incursion with a 10' pole. Why? Because incursions turned into a monetized grind fest, and that people will let the Sansha cap sit for days on it's site without engaging it and grinding more is something of a loophole.
Were it up to me, that cap would only site for a finite time during which time if it's NOT destroyed, NOBODY gets any LPs and NOBODY gets ISK. Why reward people for a failed mission?
And I am rather matter of fact about it. It feels like an easy grindfest and I don't play for easy grindfest. I know other ex-incursion players who got in during the live events, so much that the only reason why they kept playing the game is because of those live events, and seeing how the live events evolved into this ISK grindfest has them mightily let down.
I would have agreed with Skunkworks if their beef was about that.
If they had simply been about getting ISK and salvage loot, for the purposes of profit, and approached it as away of piracy that preys on the brainless (people who don't check things before clicking), I would not have been bothered by the whole affair. There's a lot of good loot to get from incursion ships, in salvage alone! It's too bad that the Sansha ships will readily pop a salvage ship - I had a Burst get bursted at 120KM out once and was loaded with around 50M worth of T2 salvage.
So if it was about profit and piracy I would have said "that's interesting" and moved on.
If they had RP'ed Sansha supporters and did what they did as a last recourse given that Sansha supporters are pretty much left out - and even those of us who were RPing anti-Sansha goals were let down by that - I would have agreed.
But no.
They made it all about griefing, tears, "look at the billions of ISK we destroyed we so l33t", and mommy don't like it when the kids in the sandbox are not building sand castles. Yes it's OK to have battles between the castles, or pretend Godzilla is destroying castles, or whatever, but when some kids start smacking the others over the head with the pale and shovel and then point and laugh at the kids they smacked, mommy takes away the pales and shovels.
As for griefers leaving the game: Sociopaths Online is that way -->
|

Lola Isabel
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 21:01:00 -
[310] - Quote
shoulda check local are huge GAY loser corporation , muhahaha |
|

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
50
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 21:04:00 -
[311] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
As for griefers leaving the game: Sociopaths Online is that way -->
I hope that arrow is pointed at Iceland. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
116
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 22:07:00 -
[312] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
As for griefers leaving the game: Sociopaths Online is that way -->
I hope that arrow is pointed at Iceland.
Yes, it's WoD. 
Hope you like black nail polish. May that be the wellspring from which all grief flows.
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
293
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 22:20:00 -
[313] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:If they were attacking Incursion runners out of protest for incursions being easy ISK faucets I would have agreed with them. Though it was not the only reason, this featured prominently in their "beef" with Incursion runners, and Incursions in general.
People say Incursions are "good content" - well, sorry, but **** that.
Missions are frankly less boring than "shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships...."
Incursions WERE good content.
The players completely ruined them by turning them into a 23/7 grind machine. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 22:25:00 -
[314] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:If they were attacking Incursion runners out of protest for incursions being easy ISK faucets I would have agreed with them. Though it was not the only reason, this featured prominently in their "beef" with Incursion runners, and Incursions in general. People say Incursions are "good content" - well, sorry, but **** that. Missions are frankly less boring than "shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships...." Incursions WERE good content. The players completely ruined them by turning them into a 23/7 grind machine.
And you speak on behalf of us? Since... when? quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
65
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 22:26:00 -
[315] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:If they were attacking Incursion runners out of protest for incursions being easy ISK faucets I would have agreed with them. Though it was not the only reason, this featured prominently in their "beef" with Incursion runners, and Incursions in general. People say Incursions are "good content" - well, sorry, but **** that. Missions are frankly less boring than "shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships, warp to next site, shoot 5 ships...." Incursions WERE good content. The players completely ruined them by turning them into a 23/7 grind machine. And you speak on behalf of us? Since... when?
Since you started shiptosting? |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
108
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 22:46:00 -
[316] - Quote
Sorry ... shiptosting? quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
63
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 01:07:00 -
[317] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:
I suppose you have to find some gratification somewhere for playing the game like an asshat, lol.
Shame that you and your compatriots continually seem to contradict this claim of achievement by trying to undermine it having a presence in the game, even with it being so insignificant a change.
But there again I suppose I have to conclude its simply a double standard of simplistic propoganda designed to convince us that all is well else you wouldn't need to have to present it in such a way.
So much stupid fail, lol. Please can I be an incursion griefer "loser" also?
I'm not really sure what this post is about. You sound kinda mad, though, so buck up pal! CCP fixed another instance in which you might have to think in order to succeed in Eve. You should be celebrating your unearned victory, not calling those of us who are actually shaping the Eve world (in quite literal terms now) asshats and losers because Ad Hominem is the only recourse you could come up with.
It's just a game man; it sounds like you should probably introduce some perspective into your worldview.
If it's legitimately confusing to you, or seems like a contradiction: the change that CCP implemented (in haste) is cumbersome and a bit insulting to Eve players, imo, but it's still OUR change. The vigor of a mere dozen of us caused it's hurried implementation into the game world we all share, and we set the Incursion griefer bar pretty damn high (two titan kills worth of faction battleships in highsec, high). In fact, any time in the future that you are saved from your own careless actions destroying your spacethings by a popup about aggression, you should utter a small thank you to The Skunkworks. You guys just be real careful not to click the "do not show again" box on that little warning! :)
~Andrei. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 01:37:00 -
[318] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Pel Xadi wrote:
I suppose you have to find some gratification somewhere for playing the game like an asshat, lol.
Shame that you and your compatriots continually seem to contradict this claim of achievement by trying to undermine it having a presence in the game, even with it being so insignificant a change.
But there again I suppose I have to conclude its simply a double standard of simplistic propoganda designed to convince us that all is well else you wouldn't need to have to present it in such a way.
So much stupid fail, lol. Please can I be an incursion griefer "loser" also?
I'm not really sure what this post is about. You sound kinda mad, though, so buck up pal! CCP fixed another instance in which you might have to think in order to succeed in Eve. You should be celebrating your unearned victory, not calling those of us who are actually shaping the Eve world (in quite literal terms now) asshats and losers because Ad Hominem is the only recourse you could come up with. It's just a game man; it sounds like you should probably introduce some perspective into your worldview. If it's legitimately confusing to you, or seems like a contradiction: the change that CCP implemented (in haste) is cumbersome and a bit insulting to Eve players, imo, but it's still OUR change. The vigor of a mere dozen of us caused it's hurried implementation into the game world we all share, and we set the Incursion griefer bar pretty damn high (two titan kills worth of faction battleships in highsec, high). In fact, any time in the future that you are saved from your own careless actions destroying your spacethings by a popup about aggression, you should utter a small thank you to The Skunkworks. You guys just be real careful not to click the "do not show again" box on that little warning! :) ~Andrei.
Please, keep your small addition to an existing pop-up event, it seems, well, very precious to you.
De facto: griefers still lost out in this situation, hence the term "losers". Sorry if you have a problem facing reality on this one as a representative of acclaimed griefers. ;)
Does it dismiss the fact that you could have easily explained the situation to CCP for reperation without escalating to its use? Don't see you quick to claim responsibility for that side of these events? That in a sense also seems to me to be exploiting a game mechanic to the detrement of others which as far as I understand is against EULA agreements? |

MarcusFenix2
Wrecking Shots Morsus Mihi
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 02:42:00 -
[319] - Quote
why all the carebare hate? honestly if you want pvp go kill a foo in deadspace instead of gunning for people with perma rep fits.
ITT> REAL MEN SOLO KILL TITANS |

Nateeight
Fist Pumpin Ass Fukers From H3ll
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 03:59:00 -
[320] - Quote
Listen up nub scrubs,
I'm the best, baddest sb pilot on planet earth. That's right, planet earth. That is where I grow my mustache, use mo-hawk boys mo-hawk as toilet paper, and punch myself in the face while making faces in the mirror.
This game sucks. World of Warcraft has monks that you can play as a cow patterned animal now.
Now go eat some pizza and slap an old lady. It will make you feel better.
Later butt holes,
-King Anal Petro
|
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 06:53:00 -
[321] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:
Please, keep your small addition to an existing pop-up event, it seems, well, very precious to you.
De facto: griefers still lost out in this situation, hence the term "losers". Sorry if you have a problem facing reality on this one as a representative of acclaimed griefers. ;)
Does it dismiss the fact that you could have easily explained the situation to CCP for reperation without escalating to its use? Don't see you quick to claim responsibility for that side of these events? That in a sense also seems to me to be exploiting a game mechanic to the detrement of others which as far as I understand is against EULA agreements?
Wow, out of touch with Eve much? (That's rhetorical, by the way, we can all see the answer in your post.) Explaining situations to CCP without escalating their use has done us all a lot of good in bringing swift change. In fact, the speed with which this change was implemented might be a record for CCP. Also, this mechanic was "working as intended" until we got our hands on it, but if you get enough people to petition us further, you never know what you might achieve. Reach for the stars!
And again, we had a lot of fun griefing you scrubs, made a lot of ISK doing it, and made some new friends along the way. This hotpatch is just icing on our cake, because it cements us as the best ever to do this thing forever (unless someone else finds another loophole...).
Also, you calling us "representative[s] of acclaimed griefers" makes us far from losers, as that's more than we were before this made us rockstar griefers.
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
64
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 06:58:00 -
[322] - Quote
MarcusFenix2 wrote:why all the carebare hate? honestly if you want pvp go kill a foo in deadspace instead of gunning for people with perma rep fits.
I think you misunderstand Eve. We we're killing foos in deadspace, deadspace are the little pockets where mission, exploration, and Incursion sites spawn. One of those is exactly the place we were hunting.
~Andrei. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
296
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 08:01:00 -
[323] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:Does it dismiss the fact that you could have easily explained the situation to CCP for reperation without escalating to its use? Doesn't work. I've tried that in the past, and CCP just sits on reported problems. The *only* way to get them to actually patch things like this is to do exactly what we did: make it into such a major problem that they can't leave it unpatched. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 08:11:00 -
[324] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:
Also, this mechanic was "working as intended" until we got our hands on it, but if you get enough people to petition us further, you never know what you might achieve. Reach for the stars!
~Andrei.
Well considering that you recognised it as a flaw in the mechanics and yet still abused it, and subsequently seem to be taking some missguided "Hero" stance in profiteering from your known confessed griefing it seems a sensible effort to log a petition, thanks for the suggestion.
Likewise there may be mileage for any individuals who were subject to said abuse of the system to reclaim their loses as a result of those actions?
As to the actions of CCP and how you think your capabale of manipulating their involvement with these elements of the game I cannot possibly comment, as in fairness they may have simply made a fix to a problem in their own good time regardless of your actions? Though I don't deny you may have brought extra attention to the situation as a result. |

Mythen
The Skunkworks
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 08:31:00 -
[325] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Mythen took the news so badly that he can't see or stand up and had to go to the hospital.
I'm actually not kidding. He's in the hospital.
I'm better now, but thanks for thinkin about me bro. :) By better, I mean I'm not dead and I'm not going to die in the next week or so. I hope. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
66
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 08:38:00 -
[326] - Quote
All the QQ'ers wrote:
QQ, but we still win because CCP has shielded us from our own stupidity...
http://www.evenews24.com/2011/11/11/dead-irish-interviews-psychotic-monk/#idc-container
Again, thank you all for being so ritarded as to get us all this attention. It's p cool, tbh.
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
66
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 08:49:00 -
[327] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:
Well considering that you recognised it as a flaw in the mechanics and yet still abused it, and subsequently seem to be taking some missguided "Hero" stance in profiteering from your known confessed griefing it seems a sensible effort to log a petition, thanks for the suggestion.
Likewise there may be mileage for any individuals who were subject to said abuse of the system to reclaim their loses as a result of those actions?
As to the actions of CCP and how you think your capabale of manipulating their involvement with these elements of the game I cannot possibly comment, as in fairness they may have simply made a fix to a problem in their own good time regardless of your actions? Though I don't deny you may have brought extra attention to the situation as a result.
Implying that there aren't any other flawed game mechanics that can be taken advantage of to create asymmetrical environments for player to player interactions? The game is full of flawed mechanics, if you want to say something to us it should be along the lines of one of these statements created for your ease and convenience:
1. You suck because you killed my faction battleship. QQ mcQQ, I hate joo. 2. Thank you for expediting a fix that we wanted to be implemented to help us play Eve without having to think or worry about the consequences of our own actions. 3. You guys are awesome, I wish I could grief as hard as you/am inspired by your achievements/wonder what your paynis tastes like.
Please choose one of the above, my space friend.
~Andrei. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 09:33:00 -
[328] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Pel Xadi wrote:
Well considering that you recognised it as a flaw in the mechanics and yet still abused it, and subsequently seem to be taking some missguided "Hero" stance in profiteering from your known confessed griefing it seems a sensible effort to log a petition, thanks for the suggestion.
Likewise there may be mileage for any individuals who were subject to said abuse of the system to reclaim their loses as a result of those actions?
As to the actions of CCP and how you think your capabale of manipulating their involvement with these elements of the game I cannot possibly comment, as in fairness they may have simply made a fix to a problem in their own good time regardless of your actions? Though I don't deny you may have brought extra attention to the situation as a result.
Implying that there aren't any other flawed game mechanics that can be taken advantage of to create asymmetrical environments for player to player interactions? ~Andrei.
The difference being is that from your own admission you knowingly abused this flawed mechanic as opposed to avoiding it. It was your "choice" to profit from its abuse at the expense of others by using it.
This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA:
"You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. "
And by definition a bug includes flawed mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bug
Que sera sera. |

PlayerName
The Skunkworks
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:01:00 -
[329] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA:
"You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting.
Luckily for us and the player base as a whole, this wasn't for you to decide. If it was, I'm sure EVE would be as dull as you are.
I can quote things and link wikipedia articles too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Care_Bears (not exactly what I was looking for, but everyone get's the idea)
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:32:00 -
[330] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:The difference being is that from your own admission you knowingly abused this flawed mechanic as opposed to avoiding it. It was your "choice" to profit from its abuse at the expense of others by using it. This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA: "You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. " And by definition a bug includes flawed mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bugQue sera sera.
Meet
Andrei Taganov wrote:Also, this mechanic was "working as intended" until we got our hands on it
I've been forced to repeat myself via quoting... What are these forums coming to?
When CCP says something is "working as intended" imo it contravenes calling it a bug. If CCP later decides that they don't want to deal with your tears because we've expertly honed the most efficient use of their game mechanics to harvest them (and admit it, we made pretty effective use of game mechanics to harvest tears here), then we will have to deal with an evolved landscape. None of us were even warned, and I can guarantee that plenty of those Incursion bears petitioned (f not, they lied to us for no really good reason), and we've been warned on plenty of questionable uses of game mechanics. We even joke about having our own SKNK. case file because the same poor GM always ends up mailing us when we get too far into the grey areas.
We're arguing from two different points, though. You seem to want to use wikipedia to prove that (all?) flawed game mechanics are bugs? Whereas, I believe that if the developer of some software explicitly says that a mechanic is "working as intended," then so long as the player base's cries that it's flawed land on deaf ears, said mechanic is not a bug. I cannot argue with you in this case, because I think you are silly. 
In any event, CCP has now (indirectly) decided that it is no longer "working as intended," so exploiting another workaround for this mechanic might actually be a violation of the EULA.
Perhaps a couple of rhetorical situations will clear the air for you?
1. Do you think it's currently an exploit to use an insured battleship to suicide gank another ship, because this seems to have recently been (indirectly) deemed a "flawed game mechanic" by CCP.
2. Do you think that providing neutral RR on a station, and then instantly docking up when targeted to prevent the loss of said logi ship is an exploit (even though it has not yet been identified as a "flawed game mechanic" by CCP)?
Hint: What we did is closer to #2 by CCP's own declarations.
~Andrei. |
|

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:35:00 -
[331] - Quote
PlayerName wrote:Pel Xadi wrote:This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA:
"You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting. Luckily for us and the player base as a whole, this wasn't for you to decide. If it was, I'm sure EVE would be as dull as you are. I can quote things and link wikipedia articles too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Care_Bears(not exactly what I was looking for, but everyone get's the idea)
Well that doesn't really make sense, as its Skunworks who have been claiming to correct this failing in the system with such "gusto".
Seems a heavily contradictory answer, or are you claiming then that Skunworks are in fact the biggest carebears atm? ;)
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:39:00 -
[332] - Quote
Right, and I forgot, we didn't exercise any "unfair advantage" over other players. The mechanic wasn't in the least bit shrouded from anyone, nor were it's consequences. We simply put it to better use than anyone else had done so far because we were able to target such a rich environment of careless players with more ISK than sense, and social engineer said group of muppets just enough to convince them to part with the deficit of their ratio. (This environment didn't exist in such a magnitude prior to Incursions, btw.)
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:40:00 -
[333] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:
Seems a heavily contradictory answer, or are you claiming then that Skunworks are in fact the biggest carebears atm? ;)
Confirming, SKNK. are in fact the biggest carebears atm.
~Andrei. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 10:49:00 -
[334] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Pel Xadi wrote:The difference being is that from your own admission you knowingly abused this flawed mechanic as opposed to avoiding it. It was your "choice" to profit from its abuse at the expense of others by using it. This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA: "You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. " And by definition a bug includes flawed mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bugQue sera sera. Meet Andrei Taganov wrote:Also, this mechanic was "working as intended" until we got our hands on it blah, blah ~Andrei.
All nice rhetoric, but you still seem to fail to grasp the difference. In that from your own position and stance you chose to abuse what you felt was a bug in the system. You admitted this, in fact went to painful lengths of feeding your own ego to justify it as such. So as a result you knowingly from your own viewpoint and understanding abused the system. This is where the difference arises from what your trying to debate as an excuse for not accepting responsibility for your own actions.
I wont judge the actions of everyone for every view point about their concerns for the game, that would be daft. But seems to be what your trying to provoke me into doing. Sorry won't fall for that kind of manipulation. Other issues are subjective until considered in their own particular context as a result.
Just seems like a massive climb down from what you were trying to wear as a nice pretty medal earlier. ;) |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 11:32:00 -
[335] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:
More irrelevant stuff...
(I guess we're redacting each other down to 'blah, blah" now, while basically empty quoting ourselves, in an attempt to generate a favorable stance through self posturing... I feel like, where the situation flipped, you might petition CCP to add some sort of popup to these forums to prevent precisely this sort of shenanigan.)
I don't recall admitting it was a bug (and I did point out the intrinsic difference, in rather reasonable terms). no feeding of my ego was purposed with justifying my actions in a video game, and the video game is giving back quite bountifully to my ego right now all by itself (check EN24, the giant TV in the CQ, or any Concord billboard in space), it's "you're" when you intend to use the "you are" contraction (can't let the classic slip), you quoted me and made some irrelevant post immediately following (so I don't see how I'm trying to provoke you), and now you're contradicting yourself by calling it:
Pel Xadi wrote:
... a nice pretty medal...
so soon after saying:
Pel Xadi wrote:
...so insignificant a change... ...simply a double standard of simplistic propoganda... ...So much stupid fail... ...incursion griefer "loser"...
You still haven't chosen which of the three prepared options I offered you to prevent precisely this sort of embarrassing situation from arising is your stance. I would advise you to limit further communications to that list, so that in the future you will be able to remain on topic in this discussion. Also, it's honestly tiring chasing down all of your scattered arguments; please pick something and stick to it, if you want to have a constructive debate. (If not, bravo on your excellent trolling skills.)
~Andrei. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 11:48:00 -
[336] - Quote
Andrei, your attempt to portray CCP's hotpatch as a victory for you and your friends is so cute! Just admit it, CCP likes those who run incursions more than they like you.
How does that make you feel? quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Karah Serrigan
The Hatchery Team Liquid
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 11:51:00 -
[337] - Quote
Pel Xadi wrote:Andrei Taganov wrote:Pel Xadi wrote:The difference being is that from your own admission you knowingly abused this flawed mechanic as opposed to avoiding it. It was your "choice" to profit from its abuse at the expense of others by using it. This imo contravenes rule 23 of the terms of service in the EULA: "You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. " And by definition a bug includes flawed mechanics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_bugQue sera sera. Meet Andrei Taganov wrote:Also, this mechanic was "working as intended" until we got our hands on it blah, blah ~Andrei. All nice rhetoric, but you still seem to fail to grasp the difference. In that from your own position and stance you chose to abuse what you felt was a bug in the system. You admitted this, in fact went to painful lengths of feeding your own ego to justify it as such. So as a result you knowingly from your own viewpoint and understanding abused the system. This is where the difference arises from what your trying to debate as an excuse for not accepting responsibility for your own actions. I wont judge the actions of everyone for every view point about their concerns for the game, that would be daft. But seems to be what your trying to provoke me into doing. Sorry won't fall for that kind of manipulation. Other issues are subjective until considered in their own particular context as a result. Just seems like a massive climb down from what you were trying to wear as a nice pretty medal earlier. ;)
How does it ******* matter what THEY think is a bug or not? I think incursions are bugged, some CCP employee who was working on it clearly put a 0 too much in the ISK outcome formula because he was coding while being over the Ballmer Peak ( http://xkcd.com/323/ ) Does it matter? No because CCP thinks it's working as intended. Do i run incursions knowing that it MUST be a bug anyway and abuse this bug? Well actually i dont but its not because i think they are bugged and i dont want to abuse it because i couldnt care less about that.
Since CCP didn't warn or ban any of them they didn't abuse any bug because the mechanics was not considered a bug by CCP until now.
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
67
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 12:08:00 -
[338] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:
My dad can beat up The Skunkworks' dad.
No one blames you for being jelly, bro.
~Andrei. |

Shaotuk
YOU BETTER
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 12:49:00 -
[339] - Quote
Perhaps this patch will allow enough breathing room for skunkworks to obtain a well-needed diaper change. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 13:49:00 -
[340] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Ammzi wrote:
My dad can beat up The Skunkworks' dad.
No one blames you for being jelly, bro. ~Andrei.
That doesn't even make sense.... why should I be jelly? My occupation in EVE didn't just get nerfed  U mad bro? Come at me man! quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
21
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 14:52:00 -
[341] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:That doesn't even make sense.... why should I be jelly? My occupation in EVE didn't just get nerfed  U mad bro? Come at me man!
Last I heard our occupation in eve was harvesting tears, kill mails, and giving people a hard time... IGÇÖm pretty sure business is still good. We made care bears lives a living hell before we griefed incursions, during, and will long after.
P.S. The reason your jelly is because we can have fun wherever we go in eve, and our tear harvest this season was especially sweet. |

Marcoss Marshall
Society of Free Agents
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 18:31:00 -
[342] - Quote
okay did anyone else see this?
http://www.evenews24.com/2011/11/11/dead-irish-interviews-psychotic-monk/#idc-container
look in the comments.
http://pastebin.com/uuJYLxnQ
wtf. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 20:25:00 -
[343] - Quote
Just quickly like to thank the "annonymous" benefactor who provided me with some ISK for previous communications. |

Lithalnas
Privateers Privateer Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 22:16:00 -
[344] - Quote
well, we got nerfed too, that didnt stop us, it just made us bitter. I suggest you find other ways to extract tears from incusion runner. I am thinking something along the line of wardecs and spies. Maybe you could set up an incursion running corp with 60% tax and a weekly dividend, gather mass assets and then walk away with everything. Oh wait I should not have said that. How to build a PC for EVE thread (by Akira T) http://eve-search.com/thread/1559734-0/page/1
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 23:10:00 -
[345] - Quote
I think it's cute that you bears are trying so hard to get tears from us.
Speaking of tears, I hadn't actually sat down and thought about how much crying it must have actually taken to get CCP to change code so quickly. I mean, that was a hotfix, not an announced and tested on SiSi patch. You guys must have really been pouring them out! I mean seriously, think about how much rage those 200ish Incursion bears must have crammed into their petitions in order to get CCP to act so quickly. Yeah, it still makes me feel kinda proud.
Oh yeah, and who was it who said we weren't affecting the game? Because that one's moot now.
So we get dec'd by (some) Incursion bears > absolutely smash that war to the tune of 121Bil destroyed and 240Mil lost > are told we aren't affecting the game because Incursions are capable of making so much more ISK than we can destroy > then we are responsible for a hotpatch that directly affects the game.
I don't see where you guys are getting these impressions of us losing from? Perhaps your tears are still blurring your vision, you should go clean yourselves up.
Oh, and we had shiploads of fun doing it, and made at least as much ISK as anyone else in those Incursions. In fact, now SKNK. has the shiniest fleet that will land in any Incursion, if we ever stoop to shooting pluses.
So, again, remind me what it is that I'm losing?
~Andrei. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 23:25:00 -
[346] - Quote
Well hello mr. positive. I bet your boss likes that feature about you.  quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 23:46:00 -
[347] - Quote
My boss would probably like it if I didn't spend so much time on a space-forum...
If I had a boss...
Or a job...
:*(
~Andrei. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.12 23:47:00 -
[348] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:
:*(
~Andrei.
OMG griefer tears?!?!
/me scoops them up for safe keeping!
~Andrei. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
299
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 01:40:00 -
[349] - Quote
Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 01:47:00 -
[350] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec.
:trollface.jpg:
And finally someone notices the true nature of our newly gifted troll! I think the pubbies either don't participate in PvP, or have been trying to withhold their tears from my collection. Damn it feels good to be a gangster...
I, for one, have already disabled this annoying popup, and I welcome you all to do the same!
~Andrei. |
|

rareden
The Skunkworks
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 02:08:00 -
[351] - Quote
Indeed ccp is starting to kill their own game, making it a little carebear haven for all the bears to come together and feel safe in their faction fit macs running incursions makeing ridiculous amounts of isk for 1month old characters. yea incursions are not op at all, funney they nerf us for fixing their broken game |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 02:30:00 -
[352] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec.
And whose fault is that? Tsk tsk tsk ... just see what you have accomplished. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Shaotuk
YOU BETTER
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 12:56:00 -
[353] - Quote
rareden wrote:Indeed ccp is starting to kill their own game, making it a little carebear haven for all the bears to come together and feel safe in their faction fit macs running incursions makeing ridiculous amounts of isk for 1month old characters. yea incursions are not op at all, funney they nerf us for fixing their broken game
Definite tears going on in this post... |

Maximus Saissore
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 13:21:00 -
[354] - Quote
I shouldn't be surprised by stunts like this any more, but...damn. Well played.
Does anyone know for sure who hired them? |

Sturmwolke
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 14:47:00 -
[355] - Quote
Amateurs ... too transparent. I wasted my popcorn  |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
300
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 16:09:00 -
[356] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec. And whose fault is that? Tsk tsk tsk ... just see what you have accomplished.
You're right, of course.
At no point in playing a game should people use anything to their advantage, because obviously the logical result is that the developer will implement a fix that fucks over other parts of the game.
slashsarcasm - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

proxwar
Klaatu Technologies
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 16:20:00 -
[357] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec.
Disable pop up.
Problem soved. |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
300
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 17:31:00 -
[358] - Quote
proxwar wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Just tried to have an actual fight in this **** pile of a game. A fight involving logistics.
Oh hey, no no no! Says CONCORD. Gotta turn off that repper every 2.3 seconds whilst you are trying to rep your CORP MATE who is also in a MOTHERFUCKING FLEET with you so I can make extra special sparkly sure you want to let the other guy possibly be mean to you as a result.
So. *******. Annoying. You lose a whole **** pile of your effective logistics who are spamming to try to get the buttons pressed.
But, of course, CCP don't care. As long as Incursion bears are happy.
And no, this doesn't just affect highsec. Disable pop up. Problem solved. Try it, then you'll see the problem. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
111
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 17:52:00 -
[359] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:
You're right, of course.
At no point in playing a game should people use anything to their advantage, because obviously the logical result is that the developer will implement a fix that fucks over other parts of the game.
slashsarcasm
Exactly, this is EVE. You have only yourself to blame for getting screwed over. 
PS: No seriously. I love how this once brilliant feature came back and bit you all in the ass. Hands down, I love the irony. I use neut logis myself and this feature messes it up, so disabling the automatic concord shutdown of reps should be implemented for those who need it. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Alexandria Aesirial
Masons of New Eden The Laughing Men
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 20:31:00 -
[360] - Quote
Good stuff but it's funny that you are whining about the bears wardecking you. Grow some balls.  It's only blobbing when you lose, otherwise it's good fleet comp. |
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
301
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 23:11:00 -
[361] - Quote
Alexandria Aesirial wrote:Good stuff but it's funny that you are whining about the bears wardecking you. Grow some balls.  wait...whining?
We thought it was hilarious. It was fun, profitable, AND we got to inadvertently grief all the neutral RR users via CCP's hasty and untested patch. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 23:49:00 -
[362] - Quote
And also it's pretty cool being a thread that's nearly as well-read as one of the stickies.
Feeds my ego. |

TalonKarrde84
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 02:16:00 -
[363] - Quote
In this thread:
Griefers exert great amounts of tryhard in an attempt to convince themselves and others that they are still relevant in highsec.
     |

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
54
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 02:19:00 -
[364] - Quote
Relevant enough that you devoted a week of your existence to spamming all incursion channels with warning about us and we still managed to kill 120b worth of Incursions *****.
Show me any other 12 dudes that are killing 120b in two weeks in highsec. Doesn't even have to be griefers. Hasn't happened in several years to my knowledge. |

Andrei Taganov
The Skunkworks
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 02:25:00 -
[365] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Relevant enough that you devoted a week of your existence to spamming all incursion channels with warning about us and we still managed to kill 120b worth of Incursions *****.
Quoted for truth.
~Andrei. |

Pel Xadi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 02:58:00 -
[366] - Quote
Andrei Taganov wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Relevant enough that you devoted a week of your existence to spamming all incursion channels with warning about us and we still managed to kill 120b worth of Incursions *****.
Quoted for truth. ~Andrei.
Continue to massage your ego's as needs, its obvious you need it to supplement your feelings of inadequacy seeing that the facts in this matter are that you had to use a flawed mechanic to aceheive the above.
You'll probably try to claim originality here also even though it was somoene else who originally came up with the concept.
Skunworks simply went on to abuse it further, so really its not much of a claim is it?
Mind maybe you feel proud of useing flaws in the system to achieve your griefing purposes as opposed to legitamate means?
In the end all you have shown is that Skunworks are lazy cowards, especially with the transcripts supporting how you set supposed situations up and run away from conflict as it suits you, so if you want to continue patting yourselves on the back about this fact then feel free. Maybe your process of chinese water torture will finally convince you also, as if you weren't so unsure of your original flawed propoganda you wouldn't have to repeat it to yourselves ad nauseum for conviction.
The legend of Skunworks will live on in the memory of others for the legitimate reason as I have explained, largely griefing asshats, not because of some achievement you like to wave at each other with continually.
Happy for you to continue to propogate its history as needs, but don't deny the real truth behind it guys, that's just stupid. Oh wait, were talking about Skunkworks here, cognitive abilities of sheep. |

Mythen
Martin Fury Petition Blizzard
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 03:12:00 -
[367] - Quote
This guy was hilarious!!! I really think he must have lost something shiney to us. He spent a week spamming several channels from morning to night warning people of what we were doing. Even during this, people were still joining up in our fleets. I'm guessing many of them ignore his spamming. ;)
I hope you feel like you've accomplished something. I know I do! |

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 10:24:00 -
[368] - Quote
Sometimes you should read more forums, I honestly did not even notice this "war" against btl and incursion runners, but ok.
Now let me get this straight? Some dudes in armor hired some mercs to wardeck a few peeps. Those shrunk heads take than revenge but destroying the competition of those dudes and than declare victory over all incursion runners, which are as a whole more or less not affected at all by this?
New forum, still no automatic double post merge. CCP Excellence.-á . Playing the game of life means to pvp. Get used to it or become extinct. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
311
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 12:43:00 -
[369] - Quote
Tenris Anis wrote:Sometimes you should read more forums, I honestly did not even notice this "war" against btl and incursion runners, but ok.
Now let me get this straight? Some dudes in armor hired some mercs to wardeck a few peeps. Those shrunk heads take than revenge but destroying the competition of those dudes and than declare victory over all incursion runners, which are as a whole more or less not affected at all by this?
Not quite what happened, but close enough.
All bluster and trolling aside, we didn't have to "win" anything. We made lots of isk, had a good time, became moderately notorious, and got CCP to patch the game in order to stop us. THAT is all the win we need. |

Dek'athor
Hedion University Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 13:37:00 -
[370] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:, and got CCP to patch the game in order to stop us. THAT is all the win we need. CCP making a patch to stop that exploit was a win for the carebares
Otherwise ther'd have been a ccp post stating "working as intended". Obv. it wasn't working as intended and carebares took the cake and ate it.
I'd be curious now to see what is the next exploit
|
|

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 14:08:00 -
[371] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Not quite what happened, but close enough.
All bluster and trolling aside, we didn't have to "win" anything. We made lots of isk, had a good time, became moderately notorious, and got CCP to patch the game in order to stop us. THAT is all the win we need.
Fair game. And bet those armor dudes laughing their ass off right now, BUT still showed you have to run actually incursions in way that is fun for you. Guess I got trolled by your propaganda post a bit ... losing a few much should not hurt much even solo incursion runners, but still makes you guys rich enough to fly shinny too.
Anyway, should this patch not work in general for neutral logistics, so far I have seen far more complains about the mechanic in general, so why do you think, you are responsible for the change? New forum, still no automatic double post merge. CCP Excellence.-á . Playing the game of life means to pvp. Get used to it or become extinct. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
112
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 14:17:00 -
[372] - Quote
Dek'athor wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:, and got CCP to patch the game in order to stop us. THAT is all the win we need. CCP making a patch to stop that exploit was a win for the carebares Otherwise ther'd have been a ccp post stating "working as intended". Obv. it wasn't working as intended and carebares took the cake and ate it. I'd be curious now to see what is the next exploit
Jamming, but that's a whole other issue. 
quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Gazmin VanBurin
Go Petition Blizzard
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 16:53:00 -
[373] - Quote
Dek'athor wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:, and got CCP to patch the game in order to stop us. THAT is all the win we need. CCP making a patch to stop that exploit was a win for the carebares Otherwise ther'd have been a ccp post stating "working as intended". Obv. it wasn't working as intended and carebares took the cake and ate it. I'd be curious now to see what is the next exploit
Your looking at it from the wrong perspective, think of it like this.
There is a giant pie dispenser that makes the best pie in the universe, but only CCP may eat its tasty treats, yet we find out a way to get the dispenser to give its pies to us. We all knew CCP would find out about it and fix their dispenser one day, but that doesnGÇÖt mean we didn't swipe enough pie for ourselves to last for months. So yes CCP fixed their dispenser much quicker than ever before, but we still win because we stole more of their pie than anyone has in a long time.
Oh and the carebears couldn't have won anything, because Carebears = delicious delicious pie tasty
|

Kali Fin
Non Mea Culpa
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:13:00 -
[374] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Relevant enough that you devoted a week of your existence to spamming all incursion channels with warning about us and we still managed to kill 120b worth of Incursions *****.
Show me any other 12 dudes that are killing 120b in two weeks in highsec. Doesn't even have to be griefers. Hasn't happened in several years to my knowledge.
Two words...Suddenly Ninjas.
A few examples of their fine work:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7476951 http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=11287122 http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7652579
|

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:20:00 -
[375] - Quote
Yup, they certainly do fine work. They've been doing it longer, with more people, and have a much more impressive brag sheet all told, and have pioneered a bunch of techniques that are common grief tools today, but per man hour I don't think it's too arrogant of me to say that our incursion ganks were the most efficient griefing in recent history. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:21:00 -
[376] - Quote
Yup, they certainly do fine work. They've been doing it longer, with more people, and have a much more impressive brag sheet all told, and have pioneered a bunch of techniques that are common grief tools today, but per man hour I don't think it's too arrogant of me to say that our incursion ganks were the most efficient griefing in recent history. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
314
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:36:00 -
[377] - Quote
Tenris Anis wrote:And bet those armor dudes laughing their ass off right now, Yeah they had a good couple of weeks where there weren't nearly as many shield fleets contesting their sites. They can claim all they want that we didn't have much impact, but I was in the incursion systems watching what kind of fleets were forming up and moving out.
Tenris Anis wrote:Anyway, should this patch not work in general for neutral logistics, so far I have seen far more complains about the mechanic in general, so why do you think, you are responsible for the change? The timing, the lack of testing, and the fact that the warning message isn't consistent with the purpose of the patch tells us this was thrown together in a hurry in a response to what we were doing. Unsurprisingly, when CCP pushes a patch out in a matter of days without testing, the patch breaks other stuff.
But hey, the incursion bears got what they were yelling for. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
314
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:40:00 -
[378] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Dek'athor wrote:I'd be curious now to see what is the next exploit
Jamming, but that's a whole other issue.  I've had an idea related to that that needs some theorycrafting and extensive testing. If I'm right you'll be seeing some hilarious fleet wipes in the future. |

Mr Bill Bravor
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:42:00 -
[379] - Quote
All I see going on here is "Wah, wah, somebody wardeced us after we ganked a few people. We will keep ganking because we are afraid of people fighting back."
Such pussies, either do it or don't. Nobody cares about you board drama.
|

Odemis
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 19:57:00 -
[380] - Quote
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:All I see going on here is "Wah, wah, somebody wardeced us after we ganked a few people. We will keep ganking because we are afraid of people fighting back."
Such pussies, either do it or don't. Nobody cares about you board drama.
Talks huge.... posts with alt. Also says he doesn't care about this "board drama" but still takes a couple minutes out of his busy life to post. 2/10 sir. I've bumped you up from a 1 because I fealt the need to retort. Also Odemis = Main. Come at me bro
|
|

Captain Nathaniel Butler
The White Company
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 20:41:00 -
[381] - Quote
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:All I see going on here is "Wah, wah, somebody wardeced us after we ganked a few people. We will keep ganking because we are afraid of people fighting back."
Such pussies, either do it or don't. Nobody cares about you board drama.
Pel Xadi wrote:
The legend of Skunworks will live on in the memory of others for the legitimate reason as I have explained, largely griefing asshats, not because of some achievement you like to wave at each other with continually.
Happy for you to continue to propogate its history as needs, but don't deny the real truth behind it guys, that's just stupid. Oh wait, were talking about Skunkworks here, cognitive abilities of sheep.
Wow! 2 people so far off the mark it really is untrue (either that or they are trolling)
I can't speak for everyone who plays Eve (unlike it seems these two here - or at least they think they do ) But I do applaud anyone who is prepaired to think outside of the sandbox to achieve their goals.
The real sheep are the people formed up in fleets killing the same npc's over and over and whining to mummy (CCP) when someone makes it a tad difficult for them... |

Mr Bill Bravor
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 22:48:00 -
[382] - Quote
Odemis wrote:Mr Bill Bravor wrote:All I see going on here is "Wah, wah, somebody wardeced us after we ganked a few people. We will keep ganking because we are afraid of people fighting back."
Such pussies, either do it or don't. Nobody cares about you board drama.
Talks huge.... posts with alt. Also says he doesn't care about this "board drama" but still takes a couple minutes out of his busy life to post. 2/10 sir. I've bumped you up from a 1 because I fealt the need to retort. Also Odemis = Main. Come at me bro
You misunderstand, I think your in game exploits are cool. Its bringing it to the board that is kind of lame and care bearish.
And what exactly did the patch do which prevents this now?
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
314
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 23:18:00 -
[383] - Quote
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:You misunderstand, I think your in game exploits are cool. Its bringing it to the board that is kind of lame and care bearish. We brought it to the board because: - C&P needed a semi-epic thread - we can post here when we can't play the game - it amuses us
Mr Bill Bravor wrote:And what exactly did the patch do which prevents this now? Any time you give remote assistance to someone with an aggression timer, you'll get a warning. If you're giving assistance to someone and they start an aggression timer, it will shut down your reps (or sebo or whatever)
I've heard that this is wreaking all kinds of havoc on PVP logi pilots and RR alts. I haven't confirmed it myself because I'm often too lazy to do things like that. |

Gritz1
Ice Fire Warriors
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 23:25:00 -
[384] - Quote
How about
-All the gankers and griefers just say they are sansha loyalists, and they are acting in his name. Then this all would be like, totally cool! |

Shaotuk
YOU BETTER
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 01:21:00 -
[385] - Quote
Yet amazingly, Incursions are still being ran and isk being made...
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
315
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 02:18:00 -
[386] - Quote
Gritz1 wrote:How about
-All the gankers and griefers just say they are sansha loyalists, and they are acting in his name. Then this all would be like, totally cool! When we started, we were bringing whatever DPS ships we had. It was a mashup of battleships and battlecruisers, with a cloaky tackler (usually a pilgrim) on grid for mechanical reasons. Once we started making isk off it, anyone who could bought a Phantasm so that we could be ganking with Sansha ships on the killmails. The Pilgrims still lurked nearby for the initial tackle. So there was a bit of Sansha pseudo-roleplay going on.
Then we figured out how to get people to eject from their ships (sometimes) and built our own shiny fleet. By the end of it, we were all on-grid with our targets and the cloaky tackler was gone. |

Major Templar
Ascendent. Test Alliance Please Ignore
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 03:57:00 -
[387] - Quote
I support your attack on all High Sec activities. Burn them all!!! |

Shaotuk
YOU BETTER
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 05:49:00 -
[388] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Out of the loop much? 
Not really. All I see in this thread is a bunch of children patting themselves on the back. But here's a clue, no matter what you do, it matters little in the big picture.
|

Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts. 31ST Reliables Division
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 16:35:00 -
[389] - Quote
Shaotuk wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Out of the loop much?  Not really. All I see in this thread is a bunch of children patting themselves on the back. But here's a clue, no matter what you do, it matters little in the big picture.
Oh hey, let's start this whole thread from the beginning again. Good call. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
317
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 18:32:00 -
[390] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:Oh hey, let's start this whole thread from the beginning again. Good call. 20 pages and he thinks he's got something to add. Yeah, I'm not doing the rounds with him. Someone get this man some copy/paste. |
|

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
88
|
Posted - 2011.11.15 18:36:00 -
[391] - Quote
Copypasta? |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: [one page] |