Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 35 post(s) |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4263

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[92] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system?
Not unless we design a bad system :).
But seriously, that's not going to be a problem. We're not novices when it comes to providing incentives. We've had a fansite program since forever that rewards registered fansites that meet our standards with free accounts and we've gotten pretty good at knowing what constitutes a worthy contribution there. Also just so it's clear we don't award straight ISK. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[93] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
The "Bring Solo Back" podcast got ISK and ships for doing PvP and talking about it. They made profit. It's hard to draw a line with those community projects. I'll draw some lines for you:Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. Don't take actions that directly increase the profits of an existing enterprise (e.g. don't tie item giveaways to Blink usage). Giving out plexes to media people is ok. Not that hard really. I was talking about the line between for profit and non profit player events/communities/websites/whatever.
If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Bjurn Akely
Knights of Nii The 20 Minuters
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:52:00 -
[94] - Quote
I think regarding why/how/to who and what-not others have said all I want to point out. Regarding how this whole thing came to be two things come into my mind:
- You guys at CCP is pretty good at coming forward with acknowledging problems and/or discussing them in a pretty open way. Kudos for that.
- You guys continue to make mistakes that almost anyone with any sort of media training or background can tell you "this will backfire when it comes out". This is a weakness CCP have. Do you have people that are working with such things (much like the most awesome Dr. EyjoG is regarding the economy)?
|

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:53:00 -
[95] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion.
i was under the impression they catered to separate niches, and i'm unaware of any group that fills the same niche as RvB at all. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kalindra Chan
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:53:00 -
[96] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:The two aspects of this that bug me are: - It was not announced at the time. This makes it seem sketchy, especially since the value of the IWS in player eyes is based on how many there are. - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
When I kill sleepers and sell their delicious gooey insides, that's my "normal operations" and I make plenty of ISK doing it.
So why exactly are they getting rewarded any more than me? It's not like they're providing a community service for free the way E-UNI or Chribba or any number of other people are.
I would be totally okay with stuff, even in-game stuff, being given to people who donate their time for the benefit of the whole community, as long as it's given out in the open.
But giving stuff to people who have as their primary goal making money off the stupidity of other EVE players? Yeah, no. That's basically saying, "Here. You're so awesome at making money that we're going to give you EVEN MORE money." exactly this! I'm a trap! |

Livonia Velorea
Banana Corp
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:55:00 -
[97] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS?
They have the same essence in that they are both a vanity item but you can't fly them for a start, they have less demand, they hold more sentimental and intrinsic value to the recipient, they offer near no discernible gameplay, they are a more appropriate reward. (in my opinion atleast)
Would it not be a bigger reward by CCP and the community as a whole if you were imortalised in the game you love by an ingame trinket, than a simple ship that alot of people get? Perhaps it's not practile or more likely it's reserved for more unique and rarer circumtances but I still thing something of this nature would be more fitting. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2654
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:56:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:That's what we're pausing until we have a better system the community feels better about; All selective give-aways of rare in-game items. Um... well isn't that the core of the problem? Making them rare is inherently going to make them extremely valuable. Selectively giving them away is favoritism.
Doesn't anybody notice this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:56:00 -
[99] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple.
If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap.
Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:57:00 -
[100] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion.
Interesting angle actually. Because even when we design a more transparent system around this, it's not ever going to make everyone completely content all the time. But we'll always try to be as fair as we can. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:59:00 -
[101] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:We recognize that gifting rare in-game items of potential ISK value proactively to select third-parties, whether as prizes for them to hand out or as a personal thank-you, can have implications no matter how well-meaning you are. We realize that for example in the IWS reward situation, a line was crossed in many peopleGÇÖs minds despite there being certain similarities with previous gifting events. Where the line of acceptability lies is something we need to work out together before we move forward. Sounds good. And yes, of course the value of the in-game things you hand out matters. In principle the same arguments apply to gifts of lesser value, but if the value is perceived as insignificant then nobody will really bother much.
Quote:Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly? Answering all those questions in order:
- Out-of-game things are IMO the least problematic gifts so I think they should be preferred as give-aways.
- Non-transferable in-game items are absolutely acceptable too if 2 conditions are met: They are truly non-transferable, e.g. just taking the IshuScorp off market and contracts would not be enough, the thing would really need to be "character-bound" or something the character doesn't even own like a monument. And the second condition is it can't have significant in-game use. I feel a soulbound IshuScorp would be comparatively useless enough to still be ok, a soulbound capital ship or T3 would already cross the line. Obviously this is a matter of personal opinion what constitutes useless. Generally speaking the more cosmetic and the less useable the better as far as in-game stuff is concerned.
- I see no compelling reason to entirely stop handing out personal rewards, as long as you take extra care of the sandbox's integrity when you do so. Btw, giving a little in-game goodie to everyone showing up at a RL meeting is OK in my book, it's close enough to "available to everyone" so I don't consider it favouritism. And prizes for tournaments and similar events that are available to everyone and which have clear rules are OK too of course.
- I think handing out rewards in bulk so early receivers can't cash out doesn't really solve any of the core issues. If you stick to either out-of-game or "useless", "worthless" in-game stuff then this point is a non-issue anyway.
- IMO if you stick to out-of-game and "useless", "worthless" in-game stuff a list isn't strictly needed, though it would certainly be a good thing to have even in this case cause transparency generally is a great thing and builds trust. For non-useless or non-worthless in-game stuff a public list is a necessity IMO, but as I said you shouldn't hand out these kinds of items as personal rewards in the first place.
|

Vahl Ahashion
Risk Breakers Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:59:00 -
[102] - Quote
In general I don't see any problem with handing out rewards providing its in the open which was the only problem I really had with what happened. That said CCP should ask themselves whether a for profit organisation which makes as much isk as Somer is the kind of organisation most deserving of receiving gifts. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[103] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote: Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing.
Gambling is also for entertainment :D If not that then for what? The podcast had advertisment (for SOMER Blink, hehe), that means the listeners were the product. If you want to take part in a Tournament you also need to have an active account.
Do ISK doublers (the scammers) give out billions of ISK for ingame events? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[104] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position.
the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kinis Deren
The Nyan Cat Pirates Disband.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[105] - Quote
I had no problem with the issue of the IWScorps since they conferred the recipients with no in game advantage (gold ammo style). I feel that the ISK value arguement is weak, since the value is based upon unfounded speculation on how rare those ships will remain.
I would urge CCP to continue to reward individual players, or organizations, as they see fit and with the appropriate oversight. I would suggest that any community reward is published to curtail any malicious suggestions of secrecy. |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:01:00 -
[106] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing.
Gambling is also for entertainment :D If not that then for what? The podcast had advertisment (for SOMER Blink, hehe), that means the listeners were the product. If you want to take part in a Tournament you also need to have an active account. Do ISK doublers (the scammers) give out billions of ISK for ingame events?
if it meant more people gave them isk to double, of course they would. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Plug in Baby
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:01:00 -
[107] - Quote
Thanks for the reponse, although not entirely sure why you bothered thanking the CSM, if their role had any value surely they would have been consulted beforehand.
Just an additional question that has come out of this, apologies if this is off-topic but it seems that any thread with the word Somer in it should be kept to one thread at the moment.
Are Somers GTC selling activities acceptable with regard to the EULA?
I.e. provided I set up a website:
A) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK for $5 profit
B) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK value of lottery tokens for $5 profit
C) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK for $200 profit
D) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK value of lottery tokens for $200 profit
within the EULA? This is not a forum alt, this is a forum main. |

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:02:00 -
[108] - Quote
Character-binding things is very much not in the spirit of EVE, and I don't think that should ever happen.
Things like the trading cards and other random items that aren't ships never seem to draw the level of ISK that a rare ship would. That might be an area for you to look at.
I still think WiS would offer great opportunities for more reward-type things. Heck, awards you could stick on your CQ walls. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:03:00 -
[109] - Quote
I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

K0ttDiledundee
Pwn 'N Play Nulli Secunda
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[110] - Quote
What about those of us who have played for many many years without breaks in our subscription.........where's our special rare items? We've spent years generating real content in the form of battles and participation in your game and we dont even get a thanjs. All sb does is rake in isk through controling a lottery with stacked odds in favor of fake/alt characters. And now they've been given even more isk. Sad ccp just sad. And what on earth is this rubicon "expansion" theres nothing new except two ships and some balancing....oh and bastion mode.................this "expansion" looks a lot like incarna. No expanding just a couple bells and whistles. Way to shoot yourself in the foot twice in about a week |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[111] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote: If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap.
Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position.
That is what I seriously don't get.
The ship is not better in any other way, it's just like a golden monocle thats locked in a station somewhere. It does not give you any ingame benefit, even if they decide to undock it, no? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[112] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Meh, the market for monocles and thousand dollar jeans is not that large and saturates far more readily. If that wasn't the case, we'd have seen far, far greater development of incarna/WiS by now.
No one would have batted an eye if CCP gave Somer 20 monocles instead of 20 IWS. |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:05:00 -
[113] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:06:00 -
[114] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person.
 CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
2139
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:06:00 -
[115] - Quote
I personally don't care about this whole Somer Blink issue, I think it has been overblown, but I do have reservations about spawning in-game items as rewards.
If CCP really wants to spawn in-game items as rewards, then the items must be non-transferable, and there needs to be transparency about the award. Not just for auditing purposes, but because as an EVE player I want to know who is doing what for the EVE community. I'd love to see a site showing all the IWS people with a brief description of what the award was for! I'm amazed that so many community heroes may not be getting any recognition beyond the reward.
I also dislike limited editions of anything, example: tournament ships, Quafe fanfest shirts, etc.
What I do approve of, and think is incredibly cool, are things like the Jita & Amarr monuments with names forever emblazoned on them, even after the events are long forgotten. I was disappointed to see those removed after the Incarna riots. I could imagine a CONCORD system set aside for just such a NCO museum. |

Erica Sukarala
Rokh You like a Hurricane Nomads.
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:08:00 -
[116] - Quote
Everyone should be happy about CCP giving away this ship as a prize. All it does is put a little money in someone's pocket. What are they going to do with it? Spend it on ships and modules that are going to get blown up. If you have a problem with this system, you should have a problem with the PLEX to ISK exchange, since anyone can just spend IRL to be space rich.
Every bit matters. |

Kate stark
576
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:08:00 -
[117] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Meh, the market for monocles and thousand dollar jeans is not that large and saturates far more readily. If that wasn't the case, we'd have seen far, far greater development of incarna/WiS by now. No one would have batted an eye if CCP gave Somer 20 monocles instead of 20 IWS. "as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox" is a bad justification. either the rewards should affect the sandbox, or they shouldn't.
nobody massively cared that they got scorpions, the fact that CCP seem to be showering blink with benevolence and half of which was done in secret is what made eyelids bat. mostly the combination, individually i doubt either would have stirred up much interest either.
Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:14:00 -
[118] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: "as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox" is a bad justification. either the rewards should affect the sandbox, or they shouldn't.
nobody massively cared that they got scorpions, the fact that CCP seem to be showering blink with benevolence and half of which was done in secret is what made eyelids bat. mostly the combination, individually i doubt either would have stirred up much interest either.
Favoritism was/is absolutely an issue. When CCP tied the chance of getting a gold magnate or w/e to Blink participation, that is a line that should never have been crossed. Personally, I would like all giveaways (excluding CCP run events like the alliance tournaments) to be limited to plex or subscription time.
But, CCP clearly wants to expand their giveaway program. Fine. I'm providing sample guidelines for that expansion.
"as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox"
Spaceships are a pretty big corner of the spaceships sandbox. Monocles for furries isn't, otherwise we'd have full fledged WiS by now. |

Cyrane Aurorea
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:16:00 -
[119] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. We want to carefully consider your feedback and determine what our framework should be and what improvements to the level of transparency are needed so that the rewards program serves its intended purpose of making the EVE Universe a better place.
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
I honestly feel this is a ridicilous decision.
It's really sad to see that cool things CCP does are now impossible due to a jealous, whining and selfish community that can't accept another player receiving special recognition from CCP and the rewards associated with that.
If anything CCP should increase its contribution to people, websites and initiatives that offer a certain (unique) service to the community, to further incentivize these.
These giveaways do not negatively impact me personally, nor do I feel that they negatively impact the EVE universe. I actually feel that the people that have received something from CCP so far have more than deserved it, and have, in most cases, enriched my experience in the game through their community contributions.
The only critique that may be deserved here is that there could be some more transparancy on the matter. An example to make it more transparant could be the following; a publication in the EVE newsletter detailing ''player abc'' has received a special reward from CCP for his/her contribution to the game, with details of what this reward is, and what contribution was deserving of such a reward (e.g. special event organized in the game).
Anyway I would hope that CCP reconsiders its stance on this subject and resumes its reward program in the near future. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
47
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:16:00 -
[120] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person. CCP should not endorse pizza toppings. It isn't fair to the other toppings. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |