Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 35 post(s) |
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2506
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 11:56:00 -
[1171] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:That sounds so wrong, but is unfortunately so right. CCP Phanton stopped others from RMTing like Somer does. What has became of EvE?
Yes, why are somer allowed to do the exact same thing - and get official endorsements from navigator - yet others aren't? |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3146
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:20:00 -
[1172] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks.
In EVE, it's the other way around. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
63
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:13:00 -
[1173] - Quote
Treb, any light on CCP's progress in their "assessment" ? |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4446
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:16:00 -
[1174] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
Which of the two roles are you doing now? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Mars OG
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:19:00 -
[1175] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around. Which of the two roles are you doing now? the money ccp wastes on the csm is what guides his talk.
he's certainly walking a line of bullshit. |
Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:39:00 -
[1176] - Quote
This account ends in December, the other is already up
In order for me to consider the situation resolved...
We need another apology from Hellmar and 6 months of subscription to prove he is sincere. |
Rendiff
Funk Soul Brothers High Rollers
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:28:00 -
[1177] - Quote
I don't see what the big deal here is. If you did something awesome you should get something awesome. |
Kate stark
711
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:58:00 -
[1178] - Quote
Rendiff wrote:I don't see what the big deal here is. If you did something awesome you should get something awesome.
but not at the expense of the integrity of the sandbox or other players.
nobody is saying people shouldn't be rewarded for doing cool stuff.
we're just saying the way they were rewarded was bad and the "system" (of which there is none, which is half of the problem) needs to be re-evaluated. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
491
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:55:00 -
[1179] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
I agree: In EVE, "bullshit talks". That's why all you've ever done is talk, or surveys. |
Nanatoa
352
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:16:00 -
[1180] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence.
I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement.
"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|
|
Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:30:00 -
[1181] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:
I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :(
Something has changed.
I closed two accounts... |
DarkDecay
Real Money Traders
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:52:00 -
[1182] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence. I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement.
Next steps?
http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/ http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/ (ccp servers are on Uk territory, involved in facilitation of gambling, and this is the appropriate regulatory body) |
Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
124
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:32:00 -
[1183] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Nanatoa wrote:Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence. I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement. Next steps? http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/ (ccp servers are on Uk territory, involved in facilitation of gambling, and this is the appropriate regulatory body)
I would also assume that the UK has laws against bait and switch tactics, which could probably be extended to this case. If you are really determined to do something about this, that might be an avenue worth exploring. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
Frying Doom
2758
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:33:00 -
[1184] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around. You left out the exceptions like Incarna.
Where Money did talk. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2743
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 23:24:00 -
[1185] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote: I would also assume that the UK has laws against bait and switch tactics, which could probably be extended to this case. If you are really determined to do something about this, that might be an avenue worth exploring.
This has already been tested in US courts (second life+)... I don't know if it's the same in the UK. There's no bait and switch here, and in-game items don't really exist. There are no legal options or risks for CCP. It's just policy. They make the internet spaceship "law" and we follow it or get banned. Just relax and let's wait to hear back from CCP on it. Then you can riot... but a lawsuit would be silly & be dismissed right off the bat, and you'll just end up paying court costs and legal fees.
|
Nanatoa
356
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 23:46:00 -
[1186] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Just relax and let's wait to hear back from CCP on it.
Words of Wisdom. I appreciate the suggestions above, but I honestly don't think that any laws have been broken (or if there have been, that any rl organisation would care enough to enforce them on a lottery with pretend-money for pretend-prizes). I just think that SOMER Blink and CCP should do the honourable thing and refund my ISK. I participated for the Gold Magnate, said as much before the prizes were changed, protested immediately after the change, in two places, and messaged Somerset Mahm ingame well before the draw took place. She claimed "we had no control / direction over the prizes", which is weird for a lottery run by them, but anyway, in that case CCP should facilitate a refund. Petitions take an awful long time to get answered though.. Meanwhile, as I said, not a single word from SOMER Blink, Somerset Mahm or CCP. "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|
Frying Doom
2764
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 00:14:00 -
[1187] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
Posted on the 16th of October...6 days ago.. Any idea of how long before you release the survey for the CSM side, or does it need to be checked by CCP first?
But in all honesty we should probably relax a little and give them some time..Not that I am saying we should completely quieten down, so they come to believe that these problems all revolving around Somer blink have gone away. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
496
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 00:58:00 -
[1188] - Quote
According to Trebor Daehdoow, the chair of this CSM, in EvE Online "bullshit talks".
I agree with you, Trebor. This is probably one of the few things I agree with you on. After all, had you been any type of competent alongside the members of your little group you [imight[/i] be doing things other than talking and telling us how CCP, the progenitors of being slimy and double-talking MMO developers, will be doing their own survey and we should be able to trust them completely.
T20 showed us exactly how CCP operates wen they think they can't be caught.
Monoclegate showed us that CCP will ignore the playerbase and CSM if it makes them money in the short-term, and then after that money is made and subscriptions are leaving by the thousands they will say, "Oh, we were wrong! Please come back!"
CCP defending Mittens during the "go **** with this guy" debacle until the negative publicity mounted with larger websites showed the favoritism.
CCP's defending of SOMER while kicking people who are doing the same thing to the curb shows favoritism once again.
CCP's inabiltiy to adequately explain to us in a month how violations of the EULA are happening, and their inability to explain to us--let alone succinctly clarify specific portions--really leads me to believe they have no clue what they are doing at this point.
Tell you what: EvE Search maintains the original postings of all forum posts, including blues. We'll keep that going. I'm also going to be screenshotting the EULA as of right now and keeping that with me. Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong.
Favoritism is a *****. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1955
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 01:31:00 -
[1189] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong.
At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you.
The difference with the DNSBlack thing is:
CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer.
Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have.
Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
497
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 01:55:00 -
[1190] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA.
However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud. |
|
Maliandra
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:29:00 -
[1191] - Quote
It only partially has to do with rarity, CCP.
Our main issue is that you're handing out free ISK to people. Every person who plays this game has to earn their ISK. If they get rewards they almost always earned it too (winning a tournament for instance).
What you are doing by handing out ISK-valued items to third-parties is giving them ISK simply for existing and being a contributor. You know how many people simply exist that help add to the EVE community? HUNDREDS!!!
You recognize that and then talk about "where we draw the line". You draw the line right at the start. You draw the line by not giving away any free ISK, ever, unless it's earned through in-game actions. If you want to have some sort of lottery where you give away things, make it done offically through CCP.
Third party entities use their profits in-game and as such, giving them anything for free created imbalance and unfair gameplay. |
Maliandra
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:32:00 -
[1192] - Quote
Also CCP you should understand why people still support your game financially:
We have two choices: 1) Spend our money on a game made by suits who want to milk every cent off us at all costs 2) Spend our money on a game made by nerds who play favorites but still give a crap about the game none the less.
You still shouldn't be proud to be #2 :P. It's not #1 I guess, but whatever.. |
raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
272
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 03:20:00 -
[1193] - Quote
As someone in DNSBlack's thread of awezome wrote,
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241
The Greenmachine Greenmachine wrote:RIOT COUNT ME IN
REFUSE/RESIST - F*ck Sh*t Up
Chaos A.D. Tanks on the streets Confronting police Bleeding the plebs Raging crowd Burning cars Bloodshed stars Who'll be alive?!
Chaos A.D. Army in siege Total alarm I'm sick of this Inside the state War is created No man's land What's this sh*t?!
Refuse/Resist Refuse
Chaos A.D. Disorder unleashed Starting to burn Starting to lynch Silence means death Stand on your feet Inner fear Your worst enemy
Refuse/Resist Refuse/Resist |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1955
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:16:00 -
[1194] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud.
And what, exactly, do you think the courts will do about it? Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
500
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:21:00 -
[1195] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud. And what, exactly, do you think the courts will do about it?
Assuming thousands of dollars are involved per transaction, small claims courts have jurisdiction. |
Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 06:54:00 -
[1196] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
Disagree.
In the infamous "Greed Is Good" memo CCP straight up said that as long as subscription numbers aren't affected, they don't care.
Which makes a certain kind of sense. Of course, once a policy like that becomes public, it might tend to push people to unsub instead of wait-and-see, since they know wait-and-see may not get a reaction. |
Sugar Von MurdererTits
D'reg The Methodical Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 07:54:00 -
[1197] - Quote
So I have about two days left on my account before time runs out. Has CCP actually announced what they plan to do about this or are they still employing the 'ignore it until the problem goes away' tactic? I stopped reading around page 30 or so and glancing through I really can't see anything except some mention of surveys.
I someone could post a quick tl;dr I'd be most appreciative.
P.S. No you can't have my stuff; I already gave it away. |
Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 08:07:00 -
[1198] - Quote
They were going to to a blog at the end of the first week, then wait until after vegas, now waiting for an unspecified length of time.
They waiting for the dust to settle and a few players to unsub, they will then brush it under the carpet giving a hint that it has : all changed and it won't happen again/ were shocked over the reaction/ most people liked it but it was just a few load mouths which had a problem/' will set up a a council elected by players to make people feel more involved in the proccess and act as a sounding board so stupid idea's by CCP won't happen again/ admit that Navigator was really Somer's ***** all along/ won't roll back this but in the future it will be diferent apart from at times when it will be the same.
But we still expected to just wait and see and trust they will do the right thing, yet the longer these things go on the more time they have to just cover it up and carry on as they like. |
Frying Doom
2773
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 08:41:00 -
[1199] - Quote
Sugar Von MurdererTits wrote:So I have about two days left on my account before time runs out. Has CCP actually announced what they plan to do about this or are they still employing the 'ignore it until the problem goes away' tactic? I stopped reading around page 30 or so and glancing through I really can't see anything except some mention of surveys.
I someone could post a quick tl;dr I'd be most appreciative.
P.S. No you can't have my stuff; I already gave it away. They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
The Legendary Soldier
A New Beginning
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 09:35:00 -
[1200] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.
There, fixed that for you :p
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 .. 61 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |