| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Jythier Smith
WATERSHIP HOLDINGS Harmonic Convergence
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:30:00 -
[31] - Quote
But, but, in their version of EVE, hi-sec operations are stupid and pointless and they're only trying to make everything better for the hi-sec guys. And get tears.
So anybody in hi-sec should be harassed, right? |

Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
396
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:48:00 -
[32] - Quote
Dudley Schwartz wrote:rabblerabblerabblehorribadgarbage
No, it's officially A Bad Post, and you are a Bad Poster.
Also, I don't know why carebears cry so much , I see so many in the freaking NPC starter corp that are over 5 years old.
So if you don't like getting wardecced children, stay in an NPC corp, there's a good lad, now scram, punk.
Or just move to null and bear it up there. Lotta money to be made in null I hear.
 |

Violet Crumble
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
36
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
Dudley Schwartz wrote:Random idea: would it be a good idea to change the war mechanics, so that PVP corps/alliances can only war dec each other? When you create a corp you choose to register your corp either as a combat corp ( actively looking for PVP ) or industrial corp.
Worst idea in like, ever.
No way and on your bit about choosing how to play, all players and Corps can already choose how they want to play, which includes all of the risks that exposes them too. But on this, no player owned Corp is immune from a Wardec and every player owned Corp can Wardec. Absolutely level and balanced playing field for everyone. |

Felicity Love
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
960
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:02:00 -
[34] - Quote
Wars are great for business... and as everyone knows, the best way to line your pockets before retirement as an elected official is to start a war somewhere and own most of the contractors involved with any of the "support" and/or "security" issues.
EVE is no different.
|

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
35507
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:
USA? Actually, our last declared war was Korea.
Came to say this.
Also, I think wardecs DO drive some new players away, which is a pity. But it's not a problem of wardecs in general, the problem is that many new players are not prepared for something like this through the tutorials and quickly give up when they are confronted with a far superior enemy. It's been quite a while since I last played the tutorials, so maybe this problem has been addressed already when CCP revised them last year....
|

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
167
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Jarod Garamonde wrote:
USA? Actually, our last declared war was Korea.
Came to say this. Also, I think wardecs DO drive some new players away, which is a pity. But it's not a problem of wardecs in general, the problem is that many new players are not prepared for something like this through the tutorials and quickly give up when they are confronted with a far superior enemy. It's been quite a while since I last played the tutorials, so maybe this problem has been addressed already when CCP revised them last year....
Ok so how many left because of WAR has brought new players in because of it. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
2429
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Wars are fine. The problem is the people who believe (wrongly) that they should be allowed to mine (or whatever) in complete peace and without any outside interaction (ganking, wars, whatever).
They'd rather be giving 26 million dollars to someone else instead of CCP. |

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
35508
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:22:00 -
[38] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:
Ok so how many left because of WAR has brought new players in because of it.
No matter how hard I try, apparently I am too dumb to make any sense out of those words.
Now I have a headache. |

Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations CODE.
2115
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:25:00 -
[39] - Quote
Orion Hellscream Chanlin wrote: Does WAR make players leave Eve?.
Let's find out. |

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
168
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:27:00 -
[40] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Baaldor wrote:
Ok so how many left because of WAR has brought new players in because of it.
No matter how hard I try, apparently I am too dumb to make any sense out of those words. Now I have a headache.
My bad, I was distracted, office girl was doing her filing, and did not proof what I wrote.
How many left due to the War dec Mechanic.
How many Joined due to the War dec mechanic. |

Zimmy Zeta
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
35512
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Baaldor wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Baaldor wrote:
Ok so how many left because of WAR has brought new players in because of it.
No matter how hard I try, apparently I am too dumb to make any sense out of those words. Now I have a headache. My bad, I was distracted, office girl was doing her filing, and did not proof what I wrote. How many left due to the War dec Mechanic. How many Joined due to the War dec mechanic.
Ah..thank you very much....for a moment you really had me doubting my own literacy, thanks for clearing this up. 
So, yeah, very valid question and I don't know the answer, I am not sure if even CCP has the answer. Let's just hope that more people join than leave....
|

Baaldor
In Igne Morim Easily Excited
168
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:39:00 -
[42] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Baaldor wrote:Zimmy Zeta wrote:Baaldor wrote:
Ok so how many left because of WAR has brought new players in because of it.
No matter how hard I try, apparently I am too dumb to make any sense out of those words. Now I have a headache. My bad, I was distracted, office girl was doing her filing, and did not proof what I wrote. How many left due to the War dec Mechanic. How many Joined due to the War dec mechanic. Ah..thank you very much....for a moment you really had me doubting my own literacy, thanks for clearing this up.  So, yeah, very valid question and I don't know the answer, I am not sure if even CCP has the answer. Let's just hope that more people join than leave....
Well, lets look at it simply, WAR decs has been around for a long time, yet the subscriptions grow. Granted you do have attrition to burn out, sandy va jay jay's and just because EvE is just to hard. But, it is does indeed continue to grow. v0v |

Renegade Heart
The MIneral Munchers
16
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
I used to play a pretty hardcore war game where you could get ganked and lose everything you built up over and over. You only had a few days after starting before you were a fair target for everyone (no NPC corp protection there). When you left the computer to get some sleep you could still be attacked. Months of work could be lost in one night while you were sleeping! And it would take months to get it all back.
Well over time I got bored of that game, and tired of setting alarms to counter things in the small hours. So I quit. Then some dude told me about EvE, and how it was better for a casual player, since you could just dock up and all your ships would be safe, etc...
I don't understand why anyone would want to sign up to play EvE and mine all day long. I can understand mining if it's to pay for ships to fight with. But mining in itself offers very little challenge apart from avoiding getting blown up.
So, maybe these players who are leaving just don't like the challenge? Why play a game if there is no challenge? Don't give me that crap about mining with friends and chatting over teamspeak because you can do much better stuff IRL with friends if you want, than mining on EvE!
Just my thoughts I know many will disagree 
[edit]
tl;dr I joined EvE because I wanted to gank people. It's why I subbed. |

Cannibal Kane
My Little Ponies of the Apocalypse Cannibal Empire
2671
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:54:00 -
[44] - Quote
All I am going to do is this....  |

KnowUsByTheDead
Volition.
508
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 21:00:00 -
[45] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:All I am going to do is this.... 
That's all you need to do...you have those glorious locks on your side.  
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1367
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 21:42:00 -
[46] - Quote
Quote:I used to play a pretty hardcore war game where you could get ganked and lose everything you built up over and over. You only had a few days after starting before you were a fair target for everyone (no NPC corp protection there). When you left the computer to get some sleep you could still be attacked. Months of work could be lost in one night while you were sleeping! And it would take months to get it all back.
What... what game is this? Details, please, you got my hopes up and everything. |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
627
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 22:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
If they quit because they were wardeced, we didn't need them anyway.
WoW ---> |

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
498
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 22:09:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:Solstice Project wrote:If they leave because of a basic game mechanic, then it's no loss.
Edit: War is declared rarely in real life? Ever heard of the USA?
Edit2: Have you considered the incoming wardecs because of this thread? USA? Actually, our last declared war was Korea. Granted, the ONLY reason we haven't declared war since then is because there was never an armistice signed. We are actually STILL officially at war with North Korea, and NATO won't let us officially declare any other wars until we officially end that one..... which will likely never happen. (so, yes.... that DOES mean North Korea is the victim of the worst perma-dec, in history... and we are the highsec griefers)
NATO has no power over the united states and is an organisation set up to combat the former Soviet union hence tbe USA can be at war and declare war with any nation it wants. North Korea doesn't even come into it as it has always been outside the primary area of operations of NATO that being Europe.
Returning to the topic any corporation should be free to fight any number of enemies on as many fronts as they can manage, because thats what we Europeans had to do in the second world war. So ive got no problem with a corp or alliance having 100 or more ongoing wars. |

Solstice Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
4338
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:22:00 -
[49] - Quote
Somebody believes that not officially declaring war means that there is no war and that "bringing democracy", which means bringing weapons and killing people is not actually war ... at all ...
Yeah, right ...
Hell, there's a whole wikipedia page about all the wars that weren't declared ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_military_operations |

Garandras
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 00:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
Bascially it comes down to the discussion that use to happen all the time on the WoW PvP servers...
"PvP happens on a PvP server"
If you dont like being wardec'd pay the ransom or stay in a NPC corp
|

Orion Hellscream Chanlin
Reverberation Inc
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 00:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
Dudley Schwartz wrote:Random idea: would it be a good idea to change the war mechanics, so that PVP corps/alliances can only war dec each other? When you create a corp you choose to register your corp either as a combat corp ( actively looking for PVP ) or industrial corp.
I don't think industrialists should be immune to being attacked ( at least they can still be ganked etc ). It is unfair for genuine industrial corps who choose not to PVP and are not interested in the PVP side if eve to be subject to prolonged grief, by PVP'ers who are searching for that easy kill.
Every player should have the option to choose how they want to play the game. Some players log in and want to PVP/PVE; some choose to mine ( each to their own is a good philosophy ).
A more direct answer to your question "does war make players leave eve?" In the case of high sec industrial corps being subject to prolonged grief by PVP'ers, then yes.
What is your opinion?
A great idea IMO and a far more worthwhile post than some of the replies I've read on here.
OK, so the "hard-core" want Eve to stay the way it is, REGARDLESS of whether it drives people away. Meanwhile CCP make a pittance for such a high quality MMO as say World Of Warcraft makers Blizzard, who DO pander to all their customers.
In a few years to come, will this marketing strategy leave Eve with a handful of dedicated followers, wardeccing as many corps as they please, or will a "re-balancing" occur which will greatly allow EVERYONE to enjoy this sci-fi simulator?
I think saying, "If you wanna leave then you aren't cut out for Eve" is a narrow perspective - there IS room for improvement which will not affect the many who enjoy the risks and danger of Eve, while allowing more players to avoid that part within reason, and within the general concept of privateers always being at large. |

Knights Armament
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
89
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Orion Hellscream Chanlin wrote:War is a necessary part of Eve - without wars and general pvp the market will become saturated and would threaten the financial infrastructure that is finely balanced.
But now I see some corps wardec 8 or 10 others at a time - they can afford to pay this as they will catch miners in T2 ore ships and the loot will pay for a prolonged campaign. However many of the wardecced corps will merely suffer the inconvenience of war, having to switch to alts, or temporarily leave their corp to continue playing their game normally.
That is when they are out-matched and unlikely to combat this wardec from a hostile corp.
I have heard of many people leaving Eve, rather than do any of the alternatives mentioned. After several wardecs they have grown tired of the losses, inconvenience, and the ease at which a hostile corp can wardec so many others with a relatively minimal initial outlay.
In truth, wardeccing should be expensive. It should be a final resort, not a casual affair done by pvp-corps to pass the time. There should be a limit to the number of corps they can 'dec at any time. I would put that at 3.
The price should escalate over weeks, doubling every week.
As we see in real life, war is not declared cheaply and is done rarely.
I am concerned that the wardeccers will drive away the others who wish to enjoy the rest of the elements Eve has to offer. While they serve a purpose they may harm the enjoyment of the majority of capsuleers.
I think the problem is its too profitable to war dec noob corps and such, so perhaps what we need is an affordable way to hire people to defend war decced corporations, I would love to have kill rights on some pirates in high sec. |

Renegade Heart
The MIneral Munchers
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:50:00 -
[53] - Quote
Knights Armament wrote:I think the problem is its too profitable to war dec noob corps and such, so perhaps what we need is an affordable way to hire people to defend war decced corporations, I would love to have kill rights on some pirates in high sec.
These noob corps you speak of have the option of allowing any other corp to join in their defense, for free. If you really want to do it, then make a new corp, and offer free help to war dec'd noobs!
Without much effort you can get free wars against many of the larger high sec merc corps out there. GL! |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1370
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
Noob corps lose nothing but a few million when they drop corp and reform.
At this point, wardecs need buffed more than anything. They aren't "wars", they're more like half assed dojo challenges. I take the time and spend the money, and at most I get the sign on your door, assuming you and the rest of the rats aren't fast enough to take the sign with you when you scamper away.
Yeah, buff wardecs. |

Tabra Penken
Nexus Incorporated
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:Solstice Project wrote:If they leave because of a basic game mechanic, then it's no loss.
Edit: War is declared rarely in real life? Ever heard of the USA?
Edit2: Have you considered the incoming wardecs because of this thread? USA? Actually, our last declared war was Korea. Granted, the ONLY reason we haven't declared war since then is because there was never an armistice signed. We are actually STILL officially at war with North Korea, and NATO won't let us officially declare any other wars until we officially end that one..... which will likely never happen. (so, yes.... that DOES mean North Korea is the victim of the worst perma-dec, in history... and we are the highsec griefers)
Wrong on point #1. No declaration of war was given by Congress for Korea
Wrong on point #2 NATO has no say in the USA declaring war, that's a power given only to congress.
The U.S.'s last declared war was WW2 all other have been "police actions" the legality of which from a constitutional stand point is highly questionable. |

Sheldor Amouh
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:18:00 -
[56] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Velicitia wrote:
It's the same bogus argument that the *IAA uses -- "anyone who downloads [movie|song] represents a lost sale of that [movie|song]".
This is actually a patently true statement. Such a process involves absolutely no sale or further monetary compensation towards the artist, and, sorry, that point cannot even be argued. Great de-railer though, and most indeed. There is no guarantee that a person downloading a song would have ever bought it in the first place, thus they cannot (by definition) be considered a "lost sale" (unless you're counting every single time someone walks past your item on the shelf as a "lost sale" ... in which case, everyone is guilty of causing serious economic harm to the *IAA and the artists they represent).
Is every dowinload a lost sale? No but some pecentage. And item on the shelf is a false analogy because the person walking by the item doesnt take it home and keep it. A closer analogy along those lines is shop lifting, the difference being in shop lifting there is tangible loss to the marketer other than the loss of sale. Because there is no direct analogy in conventional direct sales is where the grey area term comes into play. |

Good Posting
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
11
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:21:00 -
[57] - Quote
The problem aren't the hi sec war decs, in my not humble opinion. The thing is, what are the benefits of being in a player run corp in hi sec? nothing that you can't do with your alt, or alone.
In null sec, being part of an alliance pays well. You can use jump bridges, have access to intel channels, JF service, more friends to pvp/pve with... etc. Of course, you have to contribute with a little effort to make the corp you are in to grow up. Nothing is free and that is understandable.
But, what about hi sec? You contribute to the group and you get nothing back. Hi sec non-pvp player corps are just player milkers. Why build diplomatic releations with a few pvp corps to protect our player and assets? I'm sure that an indy corp can offer good stuff in exchange for that. Nah, let's keep being bad and if we get war decced then it's time to play another game. The milking will continue the next week. No problem bros, just dock up or log off. |

Lazy Eagle
FUITA
18
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:28:00 -
[58] - Quote
The War Dec systems use; for high sec ganking without concord.
The label of "declared war" has really no point beyond this.
The example of the USA is a good analog, declared or not, war will happen.
Also ~Merica~ |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1116
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:If you're in a newbie corp and get wardecced, you just have to be patient. The wardec will go away someday. Sure, being almost powerless against more experienced, shinier-shipped wardeccers is kind of frustrating and humiliating. But on the other hand, the challenge is really interesting. I can remember some excellent war room strategy discussions among my newb corp members. Much more interesting than discussing ship fits, L4 missions tactics, etc. In the end dealing with the wardec made the corp leadership smarter and made us tighter overall as a team. And the guys who were just in it for themselves left the corp. That was an added bonus.
This is the misconception, you aren't powerless at all and a few simple tactics will make them go away. Train electronic warfare and get into griffins then back those up with some cheap destroyers. Its enough damage to kill them and support to make it really hard for them to do much to your destroyers. Neither is high skill either, it just takes a little bit of thinking and the motivation to do something about your situation. The miners could never figure out how to tank their ship to the point CCP buffed them all so those two might be in short supply for your average highsec person. |

Canthan Rogue
The Graduates RAZOR Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
Attacking WT's should give you a suspect flag and sec status hit without Concord intervention in high sec. Right now, war decs are the only mechanic where you can kill soft targets without aggression penalties and without exposing yourself to external threats (bubbles, hot drops, fleets from other corps, etc). |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |