| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
lofty29
   |
Posted - 2006.04.11 16:03:00 -
[481]
<- has an idea! Why not make goonfleet one of the starting corps, so the nubs dont even have to join one of the npc corps before they go into goonfleet! 
---------------------------
 Originally by: Oveur
I see boobies! \o/
|
Christian Ethic
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 16:59:00 -
[482]
Originally by: lofty29
<- has an idea! Why not make goonfleet one of the starting corps, so the nubs dont even have to join one of the npc corps before they go into goonfleet!
Because we are invite only corp.
|
Xachar
|
Posted - 2006.04.11 21:16:00 -
[483]
It's hardly spamming when everyone in the two corps posts once is it?
A simple no from the dev's would work fine, we will give up, but a simple yes would be great and show that you do listen to your customers. Goonfleet expects no better than what CCP shows its other customers, but being that CCP has excellent customer support far ahead of other companies is such a request for a simple skill so outlandish?
We want a skill to allow more people in any corp to be seeded on the market, this is for any corp in the game, but being the first to reach the plateau we are the ones to request it.
|
Draquin
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 00:29:00 -
[484]
just an observation
Currently your caped at 1300 right?
thats just under 1% of the server
Assuming that the server size is stable I can understand why they want to keep the top corps close to 1% of the population, they dont want to see things suddenly go critical when sudenly the game is dominated by a handfull of ubercorps who can bascialy own a large part of the map, Even if you honestly cant see yourself getting over 2600 members due to constaly having to purge the Innactive newbie accounts, your still left with the posiblitiy that other corps out their will be able to take advantage of the situation
And honestly they cannot just come out and say No(Or yes for that matter), after all 6 months from now the server may very well have 300k players and at that point, raising the limmits on corp size may very well be a good idea, but they will be stuck because they "Promised" that they would not raise the limmit on size when they said no.
|
Cringeley
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 03:17:00 -
[485]
Originally by: Draquin
just an observation
Currently your caped at 1300 right?
thats just under 1% of the server
Assuming that the server size is stable I can understand why they want to keep the top corps close to 1% of the population, they dont want to see things suddenly go critical when sudenly the game is dominated by a handfull of ubercorps who can bascialy own a large part of the map, Even if you honestly cant see yourself getting over 2600 members due to constaly having to purge the Innactive newbie accounts, your still left with the posiblitiy that other corps out their will be able to take advantage of the situation
And honestly they cannot just come out and say No(Or yes for that matter), after all 6 months from now the server may very well have 300k players and at that point, raising the limmits on corp size may very well be a good idea, but they will be stuck because they "Promised" that they would not raise the limmit on size when they said no.
They could quite easily say "not in the next six months" or something (although I'm hoping they won't ;)
As far as the critical corp size thing is concerned, alliances are allowed, so there is nothing stopping people from forming large power blocs of the kind you are talking about. In fact goonfleet isn't nearly as big as the largest alliances. So really the sovereignty skill is just an administrative thing. It makes little difference to the game world but a huge difference to anyone trying to run two huge corps with split hangars, wardecs, etc.
--------------------------------------------
Thrice is he armed who has his quarrel just,
But four times he who gets his blow in fust. |
Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 03:22:00 -
[486]
Pwetty Pwease?
|
Thoreau
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 15:39:00 -
[487]
Just following up again after a couple of days showing my interest in a response. It's still pretty miserable having two corps logistically.
|
Chicken Supreme
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 15:55:00 -
[488]
Can we get a response on this please?
|
Jackie Carlan
|
Posted - 2006.04.12 19:46:00 -
[489]
I would be nice if we could get some official word on this skill.
|
Woody Barbarian
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 00:47:00 -
[490]
CCP, I dare you to release this skill.
|
Caldari Citizen656
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 01:11:00 -
[491]
This thread is getting old. I would imagine the Dev's feel the same way. I, for one, hope CCP knows giving into this nonsence will only encourage you to act the same way again next time you want something.
|
Sitek
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 04:12:00 -
[492]
hurr at ^
Please release this skill CCP. We shouldn't be punished for bringing in lots of new blood to Eve.
|
GusHobbleton
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 04:14:00 -
[493]
Thirty Helens agree:
Sovreignty must be released!
---------------
|
Aliksr
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 06:09:00 -
[494]
Yet another reason we need to be one corporation again:
offices in conquerable stations |
pshepherd
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 08:21:00 -
[495]
|
Virtuoso DeToure
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 21:01:00 -
[496]
Originally by: Aliksr
Yet another reason we need to be one corporation again:
offices in conquerable stations
If for only this reason alone, please CCP, I beg of you release this skill. It's practically game-breaking for the members and directors of our Corporation.
|
Stahlregen
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 23:06:00 -
[497]
I dont think alot of you realise how infuriating it is to have to use an alt to trade to you just so that you can transfer items to and from the corp hangars. This is ridiculous, CCP please release Sovereignty.
"Don't worry, My friend is just admiring the shape of your skull-throne." |
Keldjos Falzir
|
Posted - 2006.04.13 23:39:00 -
[498]
The logistical nightmares of having two split corps are becoming detrimental to our play experience. Any kind of response (Yes, No, Not yet, shut up) would be greatly appreciated.
|
Lanier Vasan
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 01:43:00 -
[499]
it sure would be nice if we didnt have to have the waffe and the fleet, that way we wouldnt run into all kinds of problems with shared canisters...
Sovreignity would be very helpful!
|
Viscount Prawn
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 03:25:00 -
[500]
I got Concorded in my Scorpion today because I stupidly forgot to check that the goon I was jokingly firing at was in GoonWaffe instead of GoonFleet.
This is ridiculous. Please, release Sovereignty!
|
Aliksr
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 09:06:00 -
[501]
Edited by: Aliksr on 14/04/2006 09:07:11
GoonFleet is operating in a major war theatre at the moment and half our directorship is unable to help with the logistics efforts because it's simply too complicated to duplicate everything over two corp hangars.
This is incredibly frustrating for the directors trying to help, and doubly so for those who want to fight but have nothing to fight in or arent sure how to get their hands on a ship and fittings.
At least we were lucky enough to get a second office for GoonWaffe in this conquerable station so people can remotely change their clones to this station but that doesnt help much when it's simply too complicated to maintain stockpiles in both corp hangars.
Please we beg of you just seed this on the market overnight. I know it's been done before with other skills. It's already programmed. Make it cost 6 billion isk and available only in Angel Cartel stations in deepest southern 0.0 we don't care we're in desperate need of this.
|
Thoreau
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 15:49:00 -
[502]
Patience is a virtue and we're still waiting on an official response on Sovereignty. Just a little reminder today. At least we're not making a fuss after not getting a response after only 2 hours or a day! That's usually how business works.
|
Mister Spanky
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 16:38:00 -
[503]
Edited by: Mister Spanky on 14/04/2006 16:39:34
I'm not a member of Goonfleet but can the none Goonfleet flamer's stop trolling this thread please?
The only reason this thread has gone on for so long is that nobody has bothered to give Goonfleet a response. They've already said a simple "no" would do. So if the skill (which already exists) is not going to be released, why not just say so..?
|
Kerry Rose
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 17:47:00 -
[504]
Originally by: Mister Spanky
Edited by: Mister Spanky on 14/04/2006 16:39:34
I'm not a member of Goonfleet but can the none Goonfleet flamer's stop trolling this thread please?
The only reason this thread has gone on for so long is that nobody has bothered to give Goonfleet a response. They've already said a simple "no" would do. So if the skill (which already exists) is not going to be released, why not just say so..?
no 
Originally by: Wrangler
If you use caps in the topic again I'll steal your shift and capslock keys.
|
biggfoo
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 20:30:00 -
[505]
You know what would make my Easter special?
A cadbury creme Sovereignty skill book.
|
Jackie Carlan
|
Posted - 2006.04.14 22:19:00 -
[506]
It would be really nice to hear some sort of official word on this skill. Thanks :D
|
hova sleestak
|
Posted - 2006.04.15 00:58:00 -
[507]
I wish we had a simple yes/no answer. It is very important to us.
|
Freeside
|
Posted - 2006.04.15 05:52:00 -
[508]
Edited by: Freeside on 15/04/2006 05:52:02
My son is dying of bone-itis and his dying wish is for you to release this skill. 
|
Jackie Carlan
|
Posted - 2006.04.15 06:27:00 -
[509]
Please, is there any new information on this skill yet?
|
Surtor
|
Posted - 2006.04.15 07:10:00 -
[510]
Is this skill slated to be released soon?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |