EVE Search - Mobile Depot - Game Breaking Feature

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Mobile Depot - Game Breaking Feature

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
March rabbit True Horde 888	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:30:00 - [121] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: March rabbit wrote: Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Jythier Smith wrote: I'm just curious what the problem is with bringing enough scrams to do the job. You know they can refit... "But I don't WANT to have to do that!" is not the same thing as 'The game is broken now'. The game is DIFFERENT now. You realise that most tacklers only have max 4 mids if that, they usually need a prop mod, web, scram and some form of tank - .... And your 'don't attack ships if they have a mobile depot out' - speechless... EvE's New Carebearism doctrine at its finest. Maybe you should bring a ship that is up to the task? I.e. choose a ship with more mid slots and/or a armor tanking ship. With 2 RF warp scramblers, the target needs to have 6 stabs fitted to warp away, why is that not an option? i like it how you advice to use 2x RF scramblers of tackler looks like goons these days have no ideas about market prices.... and about pvp in general.... Is it real sign of Eve finally dumbed down? You know you can run missions and get those scramblers for a lot cheaper than on market. standard "MIMAF"? Have Tippia bought this character too? The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
RubyPorto SniggWaffe WAFFLES. 4358	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:31:00 - [122] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: You're fantastic as saying nothing while sounding like the authoritive voice of CCP. That's pretty much what you did there say nothing and pretend you provided an answer. All of those arguments fail. 1. You cannot fit more scrams than you have mid slots. Sure you can. Bring a friend in an interceptor or two with you. Quote: 3. Bring friends... as I said above, every gang needs 8 interceptors now to tackle one ship? To tackle a ship that's entirely given up its ability to relocate quickly in order to minimize his chances of being tackled. Quote: 4. To put an 18k depot into reinforced in a tackling ship is impossible before the owner can click it and refit, it takes several seconds to refit. Yes, a perfectly prepared and ready target sitting next to their previously onlined depot will probably get away. Where's the problem? A less prepared target gives you a full minute to put the depot into RF, which is plenty of time. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon d-£-ó¦¦¦º-ó-ê¦ª¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-ó¦¦¦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Å¦+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ç¦¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ê¦½¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ
Jythier Smith WATERSHIP HOLDINGS Harmonic Convergence 172	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:31:00 - [123] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Do you even play EvE? Sorry, I thought we were talking about Hello Kitty online.
The Spod Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 113	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:32:00 - [124] - Quote Some came here expecting resonance to their claims to nerf PVP escape tools. No resonance. Some came here expecting resonance for their demands to lower the difficulty level of solo ganking, which as a career is a visible emblem of "hard mode". No resonance. I came here trumpeting the same circlejerk this tread rapidly degenerated into. No resonance.
March rabbit True Horde 888	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:32:00 - [125] - Quote Jythier Smith wrote: Okay, wait, I thought he was running away? Now your enemy is staying and fighting! Isn't that what you wanted? Why didn't you put together a fit that would kill someone who stays and fights? welcome to pvp mate o/ (there is big secret no one ever speaks of: there are different fits for different purposes) Have fun and get some kills! The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Jythier Smith WATERSHIP HOLDINGS Harmonic Convergence 172	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:34:00 - [126] - Quote March rabbit wrote: Jythier Smith wrote: Okay, wait, I thought he was running away? Now your enemy is staying and fighting! Isn't that what you wanted? Why didn't you put together a fit that would kill someone who stays and fights? welcome to pvp mate o/ (there is big secret no one ever speaks of: there are different fits for different purposes) Have fun and get some kills! Dude, I know. But the problem is, they're complaining about people being able to put on different fits for different purposes as if they cannot do the same thing.
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops 17543	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:34:00 - [127] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: You cannot fit more scrams than you have mid slots. This module removes any functionality that a interceptor has regarding CCP's supposed "they're supposed to intercept". Please Tippia, explain to me how any interceptor can intercept a ship that can fit more WCS than an inty can fit disruptors? By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points. Quote: Tell me how we're supposed to jump into a renter system with a 10 large bubbles on a gate, tackle a ratter and stay alive long enough to keep him there with our 3 scrams, no prop mod, tank, cap injector? Same as above. Quote: Yes, lets ask the target to sit around while our bubbles anchor Just like you should just sit around and waut while his depot anchors. And there are more than one type of bubbleGÇª Quote: Bring friends... as I said above, every gang needs 8 interceptors now to tackle one ship? Your unwillingness or inability to employ a strategy does not make it a GÇ£fail" strategy. Quote: To put an 18k depot into reinforced in a tackling ship is impossible before the owner can click it and refit, it takes several seconds to refit. See above. Do it right and you'll need an impossible 200dps. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0.
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3494	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:35:00 - [128] - Quote Jythier Smith wrote: Okay, wait, I thought he was running away? Now your enemy is staying and fighting! Isn't that what you wanted? Why didn't you put together a fit that would kill someone who stays and fights? You my have thought you had a point there Jy, but you're arguing with someone who can't see past their own self-interest, so what looks to you and me and the rest of the world like a glaring contradiction is seen as constant thinking by him lol. Infinity doesn't want a fight, he wants a kill. All of his posting history point to that fact, from "local needs to go away because i can't sneak up on null bears" (see the "local" collection thread in the Features and ideas forum) to "Sov space needs some place for me to dock and refit because I had to fly 72 jumps" to the current whine about mobile depots.
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:35:00 - [129] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: 1. You cannot fit more scrams than you have mid slots. This module removes any functionality that a interceptor has regarding CCP's supposed "they're supposed to intercept". Please Tippia, explain to me how any interceptor can intercept a ship that can fit more WCS than an inty can fit disruptors? Or do you think inties should fit scrams now and orbit at 10k? Even if they did, still not enough scrams. Tell me how we're supposed to jump into a renter system with a 10 large bubbles on a gate, tackle a ratter and stay alive long enough to keep him there with our 3 scrams, no prop mod, tank, cap injector? Do we now use 8 interceptors to tackle one battleship? Don't be foolish. How about when we have to tackle a carrier? Oh and what about that battleship that has 8 heavy neuts in his depot, or a bunch of ECM, or sensor damps, or RLML. Those are challenges to be over come, not broken thens for CCP to legislate away. The purpose of a game is to find new and neat ways to do things. But you don't want that, you simply seem to want guaranteed success. You mean to tell me that you can bring an alt to do plexes in someone elses space (your scout that you have mentioned numberous times) but you can't train that all for a light dictor? How long does it take a light dictor to burn out of bubbles and warp to your inty that has the tackle? Lol. They're not challenges. They're impossibilities. So by your logic to tackle one ratting ship we now need: 1 interceptor - jumps through gate, intitial tackle. 1 dictor - jumps through gate after initial tackle, burns 30-45k to get out of bubble and warps to inti, which is nueted, webbed, scrammed and being slaughtered by warrior II's. 1 Hictor - jumps through gate after initial tackle, burns 30 - 45k to get out of bubble and warps to dead inti, and probably dead dictor. Finds nothing cause it was a T3 which switched to nullifier and WCS and warped out of dictor bubble... Yay.
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3496	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:40:00 - [130] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Lol. They're not challenges. They're impossibilities. So by your logic to tackle one ratting ship we now need: 1 interceptor - jumps through gate, intitial tackle. 1 dictor - jumps through gate after initial tackle, burns 30-45k to get out of bubble and warps to inti, which is nueted, webbed, scrammed and being slaughtered by warrior II's. 1 Hictor - jumps through gate after initial tackle, burns 30 - 45k to get out of bubble and warps to dead inti, and probably dead dictor. Finds nothing cause it was a T3 which switched to nullifier and WCS and warped out of dictor bubble... Yay. Nope. 1 inty....with a mobile depot of it's own (omg he has neuts, I better slap on this CAP BATTERY). And then a dictor. You use an alt for PVE but the idea of using an alt for PVP is bad? The point is you have given up before even trying. You just demonstrated it by saying "impossible".
Jythier Smith WATERSHIP HOLDINGS Harmonic Convergence 172	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:43:00 - [131] - Quote How much ship should you have to bring against a ship that is carrying around a mobile depot and 3 ship fits (rat, PVP, run away)? That's a lot of value should you succeed.
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3540	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:44:00 - [132] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: LMAO. So many bears in one thread. I'm predicting they'll get a nerf, either that or people will just leave a PvP game where you cannot actually PvP because of one fail module by whatever fail dev thought it was a great idea... Why don't we just give all the ships in game, the same number of inbuilt warp strength points as they have low slots... easier, will attract a lot of people that normally wouldn't play EVE due to its 'harshness'. :) Try shooting ** that shoots back if you don't like being outsmarted by PVE folk. Baaaaw don't give PVEers more tools baaaaw i wanna make them cwy baaaaw. *** nerd. -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-**
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:47:00 - [133] - Quote Tippia wrote: By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points.[\quote] Lets play a little scenario. I'm in a Apocalypse, shooting Bloods in a Sanctum. You're in an interceptor, lets say its a Crow and you're with a friend also in a Crow. You have 2 friends who are in Cynabals. You're going to jump into a renter system, the in system side has 10 large T1 bubbles on the gate (as they usually do) and warp to the only Sanctum and tackle whatever is there. I have a depot deployed. I have 8 heavy neuts. Cap booster. Warrior 2's. 3 webs. 8 WCS. Some sensor damps and the depot filled with Cap Boost 400's. How do you propose you're going to kill me?
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3540	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:55:00 - [134] - Quote 4people with scrams. Cynabals on drone duty with their autocannons not needing cap. Warriors die as that is their only source of dps. Focus fire on apoc as it is not tanked. If cap doesnt hold because of neuting, have intys bump with cynabals to prevent the apoc from aligning. -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:55:00 - [135] - Quote Anslo wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: LMAO. So many bears in one thread. I'm predicting they'll get a nerf, either that or people will just leave a PvP game where you cannot actually PvP because of one fail module by whatever fail dev thought it was a great idea... Why don't we just give all the ships in game, the same number of inbuilt warp strength points as they have low slots... easier, will attract a lot of people that normally wouldn't play EVE due to its 'harshness'. :) Try shooting ** that shoots back if you don't like being outsmarted by PVE folk. Baaaaw don't give PVEers more tools baaaaw i wanna make them cwy baaaaw. *** nerd. I mostly PvE actually. I can still make you cry. I suspected this nerf was coming and have trained up 7 SB's and got myself an ISBoxer account for when I want to make you cry. Don't come whining to forums when I uncloak my Proteus and 7 SB and blow you the hell up ;) Anslo wrote:** 4people with scrams. Cynabals on drone duty with their autocannons not needing cap. Warriors die as that is their only source of dps. Focus fire on apoc as it is not tanked. If cap doesnt hold because of neuting, have intys bump with cynabals to prevent the apoc from aligning. LMAO. Simple math. Inties = 1 disruptor. Cynabals = 1 scram each. 6 vs 8 WCS. Fail Double edit: Wait Inties are bumping??? I'm learning PEE VEE EEE Triple Edit: Wow, just needed to say WoW. Where are these ships getting their cap to scram btw?
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3496	Posted - 2013.11.26 16:57:00 - [136] - Quote Anslo wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: LMAO. So many bears in one thread. I'm predicting they'll get a nerf, either that or people will just leave a PvP game where you cannot actually PvP because of one fail module by whatever fail dev thought it was a great idea... Why don't we just give all the ships in game, the same number of inbuilt warp strength points as they have low slots... easier, will attract a lot of people that normally wouldn't play EVE due to its 'harshness'. :) Try shooting ** that shoots back if you don't like being outsmarted by PVE folk. Baaaaw don't give PVEers more tools baaaaw i wanna make them cwy baaaaw. ***** nerd. %^&* this now I know i'm losing ym freaking mind, 1st Herzog now Anslo. W.....T....F? That warmth you feel under your feet is the nuclear reaction going on in hell after freezing over.
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3541	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:01:00 - [137] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Anslo wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: LMAO. So many bears in one thread. I'm predicting they'll get a nerf, either that or people will just leave a PvP game where you cannot actually PvP because of one fail module by whatever fail dev thought it was a great idea... Why don't we just give all the ships in game, the same number of inbuilt warp strength points as they have low slots... easier, will attract a lot of people that normally wouldn't play EVE due to its 'harshness'. :) Try shooting ** that shoots back if you don't like being outsmarted by PVE folk. Baaaaw don't give PVEers more tools baaaaw i wanna make them cwy baaaaw. *** nerd. I mostly PvE actually. I can still make you cry. I suspected this nerf was coming and have trained up 7 SB's and got myself an ISBoxer account for when I want to make you cry. Don't come whining to forums when I uncloak my Proteus and 7 SB and blow you the hell up ;) Anslo wrote: 4people with scrams. Cynabals on drone duty with their autocannons not needing cap. Warriors die as that is their only source of dps. Focus fire on apoc as it is not tanked. If cap doesnt hold because of neuting, have intys bump with cynabals to prevent the apoc from aligning. LMAO. Simple math. Inties = 1 disruptor. Cynabals = 1 scram each. 6 vs 8 WCS. Fail Bring your proteus to Huola then. We need moar kills. Also you failed to plan then. If you were going after plexers like a coward you should anticipate warp core stabs and have everyone fit scrams, not disruptor. Suck it up, nerd. -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-**
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:03:00 - [138] - Quote Anslo wrote: Suck it up, nerd. :) I'm not the one calling namies on a internet gaming forums
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3496	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:04:00 - [139] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Tippia wrote: By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points.[\quote] Lets play a little scenario. I'm in a Apocalypse, shooting Bloods in a Sanctum. You're in an interceptor, lets say its a Crow and you're with a friend also in a Crow. You have 2 friends who are in Cynabals. You're going to jump into a renter system, the in system side has 10 large T1 bubbles on the gate (as they usually do) and warp to the only Sanctum and tackle whatever is there. I have a depot deployed. I have 8 heavy neuts. Cap booster. Warrior 2's. 3 webs. 8 WCS. Some sensor damps and the depot filled with Cap Boost 400's. How do you propose you're going to kill me? Erm, why do you think you're automatically supposed to win in a fight like that, where the targeted pilot has done enough (by thinking ahead about what stuff to carry around in his cargo hold) to survive? This is proof of what I say, you don't want a fight you want a kill. A good PVPr is thinking "good show Apoc guy, in the future I'll have to rethink my strategy, maybe trading a cynabal for a dictor that can get out of the bubbles faster, and warp faster to save my crows and bubble the target". That's a good PVPr, a bad PVPr runs to the forums and lobbies CCP for victory.
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3542	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:07:00 - [140] - Quote I'm not the one bitching about PvE'ers being smart and PvPers not getting easy kills. Also ironic. You PvE more but dislike PvEers having more tools to help them survive in lowsec, etc. Lolwat m8. -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:07:00 - [141] - Quote Jenn aSide wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Tippia wrote: By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points.[\quote] Lets play a little scenario. I'm in a Apocalypse, shooting Bloods in a Sanctum. You're in an interceptor, lets say its a Crow and you're with a friend also in a Crow. You have 2 friends who are in Cynabals. You're going to jump into a renter system, the in system side has 10 large T1 bubbles on the gate (as they usually do) and warp to the only Sanctum and tackle whatever is there. I have a depot deployed. I have 8 heavy neuts. Cap booster. Warrior 2's. 3 webs. 8 WCS. Some sensor damps and the depot filled with Cap Boost 400's. How do you propose you're going to kill me? Erm, why do you think you're automatically supposed to win in a fight like that, where the targeted pilot has done enough (by thinking ahead about what stuff to carry around in his cargo hold) to survive? snip BS . Yeah um, 4 pvp fit ships which had to think ahead and plan their fits vs 1 pve ratter. Fugging absolutely 100% they're supposed to win if he can't warp out. What planning did he do but throw a bunch of just in case mods in a depot. You have zero credibility Jenn. You're simply happy you can now carebear in null in 200% safety instead of the old 100% right?
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3542	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:11:00 - [142] - Quote >says he didnt plan cause herpaderp mod >planned to bring mods in case. Wat. Also, i don't like Jenn much, but he's got more credibility than a whining tart contradicting herself at every turn. Where are you l33t killz, where's your combat record? Where are your credentials? -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3497	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:13:00 - [143] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Infinity Ziona wrote: Tippia wrote: By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points.[\quote] Lets play a little scenario. I'm in a Apocalypse, shooting Bloods in a Sanctum. You're in an interceptor, lets say its a Crow and you're with a friend also in a Crow. You have 2 friends who are in Cynabals. You're going to jump into a renter system, the in system side has 10 large T1 bubbles on the gate (as they usually do) and warp to the only Sanctum and tackle whatever is there. I have a depot deployed. I have 8 heavy neuts. Cap booster. Warrior 2's. 3 webs. 8 WCS. Some sensor damps and the depot filled with Cap Boost 400's. How do you propose you're going to kill me? Erm, why do you think you're automatically supposed to win in a fight like that, where the targeted pilot has done enough (by thinking ahead about what stuff to carry around in his cargo hold) to survive? snip BS . Yeah um, 4 pvp fit ships which had to think ahead and plan their fits vs 1 pve ratter. Fugging absolutely 100% they're supposed to win if he can't warp out. What planning did he do but throw a bunch of just in case mods in a depot. You have zero credibility Jenn. You're simply happy you can now carebear in null in 200% safety instead of the old 100% right? Yea, because I'm so scared of losing Domiixes lol. I prepared to defend myself long before mobile depots and my fits haven't changed. You don't get it, and the reason why you don't is you (as usual). You think you are entitled to a kill against a prepared target. You are not. The Apoc pilot thought away and put a mobile depot + mods in his cargo hold, which is more than most people would do. If he gives you the slip because you failed to use the tools the game gives you (A DICTOR) then the loss is your fault.
Infinity Ziona Cloakers 835	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:14:00 - [144] - Quote Anslo wrote: I'm not the bitching about PvE'ers being smart and PvPers not getting easy kills. Also ironic. You PvE more but dislike PvEers having more tools to help them survive in lowsec, etc. Lolwat m8. EvE is supposed to be difficult. What fun is it for me if I can sit in an anom next to an I Win Button with zero risk. I might as well go play World of Warcraft. EvE is fun because its risky, today I was flying around Pure Blind with a weeks worth of anom loot (billions in mods and bpcs) in a billion isk Ishtar ninja'ing anoms. I had to sneak it through a couple of wormholes, jump in low sec and red rover to high. That's fun for me. I sometimes spend hours sitting in a covert ops watching people in a hub system, visually checking their ships for weapons, figuring out their patterns and then I kill them based on that intel. Now its going to be warp to target, target refits and nuets, jams, damps, trackign disrupts or fits wcs and laughs in local as they're leaving. Perfectly boring shite gameplay.
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3497	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:16:00 - [145] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Anslo wrote: I'm not the bitching about PvE'ers being smart and PvPers not getting easy kills. Also ironic. You PvE more but dislike PvEers having more tools to help them survive in lowsec, etc. Lolwat m8. EvE is supposed to be difficult. What fun is it for me if I can sit in an anom next to an I Win Button with zero risk. I might as well go play World of Warcraft. EvE is fun because its risky, today I was flying around Pure Blind with a weeks worth of anom loot (billions in mods and bpcs) in a billion isk Ishtar ninja'ing anoms. I had to sneak it through a couple of wormholes, jump in low sec and red rover to high. That's fun for me. I sometimes spend hours sitting in a covert ops watching people in a hub system, visually checking their ships for weapons, figuring out their patterns and then I kill them based on that intel. Now its going to be warp to target, target refits and nuets, jams, damps, trackign disrupts or fits wcs and laughs in local as they're leaving. Perfectly boring shite gameplay. So when they were sheep to the slaughter, that was exciting game play, but now that they can fight back, it's boring. See what I mean, totally self centered way of thinking. You discredit yourself with every post.
Anslo The Scope Gallente Federation 3542	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:17:00 - [146] - Quote Where's the fun in having an iWin button to gank people without much planning? -\_For the Proveldtariat_/-
The Spod Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 114	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:19:00 - [147] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Tippia wrote: By ensuring he doesn't get the chance to fit nothing but WCSes or by bringing more misdlots or by using methods that don't care about warp stability points.[\quote] Lets play a little scenario. I'm in a Apocalypse, shooting Bloods in a Sanctum. You're in an interceptor, lets say its a Crow and you're with a friend also in a Crow. You have 2 friends who are in Cynabals. You're going to jump into a renter system, the in system side has 10 large T1 bubbles on the gate (as they usually do) and warp to the only Sanctum and tackle whatever is there. I have a depot deployed. I have 8 heavy neuts. Cap booster. Warrior 2's. 3 webs. 8 WCS. Some sensor damps and the depot filled with Cap Boost 400's. How do you propose you're going to kill me? Get in another site and login trap it, or bingo the next site he goes to while he is midwarp. Before Rubicon you were not going to catch a ratter on the ready in the first place if you go through a bubbled gate, and your example showcases a ratter on the ready. Just like ratters were not ready before Rubicon and you caught them, you will catch unready ones after Rubicon. To play your scenario, land on the site fast (Rubicon) with the ceptor and bump him out of depot range before he has a lock on you. During the same reaction time you had earlier to escape, you will now have to refit the stabs. Getting out of the bubbles was a time sink comparable to the apoc's align time earlier. However, the ones without the escape depot will be out of luck versus the now overpowered ceptor tackle.
RubyPorto SniggWaffe WAFFLES. 4361	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:19:00 - [148] - Quote Infinity Ziona wrote: Yeah um, 4 pvp fit ships which had to think ahead and plan their fits vs 1 pve ratter. Fugging absolutely 100% they're supposed to win if he can't warp out. What planning did he do but throw a bunch of just in case mods in a depot. You have zero credibility Jenn. You're simply happy you can now carebear in null in 200% safety instead of the old 100% right? No, that's 4 PvP ships that haven't put any thought into how to fit their ships in something like a year (Hint, the Apoc could also MJD away from the Intys pretty effectively) losing out on a kill because their target has decided to render himself immobile and take several extra minutes at each and every anom to deploy and scoop a Mobile depot to provide himself with extra safety. Before the patch, all he had to do to get the same level of safety was "be aligned." "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon d-£-ó¦¦¦º-ó-ê¦ª¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-ó¦¦¦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Å¦+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ç¦¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ê¦½¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ
Jythier Smith WATERSHIP HOLDINGS Harmonic Convergence 175	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:21:00 - [149] - Quote Stawp. Only ideas for avoiding getting killed, make them think of their own way to kill us.
Jenn aSide STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries 3497	Posted - 2013.11.26 17:23:00 - [150] - Quote The Spod wrote: Get in another site and login trap it, or bingo the next site he goes to while he is midwarp. Before Rubicon you were not going to catch a ratter on the ready in the first place if you go through a bubbled gate, and your example showcases a ratter on the ready. Just like ratters were not ready before Rubicon and you caught them, you will catch unready ones after Rubicon. To play your scenario, land on the site fast (Rubicon) with the ceptor and bump him out of depot range before he has a lock on you. During the same reaction time you had earlier to escape, you will now have to refit the stabs. Getting out of the bubbles was a time sink comparable to the apoc's align time earlier. However, the ones without the escape depot will be out of luck versus the now overpowered ceptor tackle. So much this. I know i pick on Infinity, but I know people like this in real life, for which all thinking shuts down when they see something they want or see something as unfair even when it really isn't. Those feeling cloud judgment and Infinity demonstrates this all the times in posts.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.