Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 67 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
268
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:30:00 -
[121] - Quote
Well, in a positive note, those UI changes look pretty slick. Not to mention the changes to batch numbers are a welcome sight.
Not really sure what the big fuss is all about, but look on the bright side; they are nerfing something that accounts for a very small percentage of mission runner income at the most. It's not like they doing something crazy like nerfing bounties. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9194
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:38:00 -
[122] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Nerfs like this are a direct attack by the null sec cartels against high sec. No, nerfs like this are a change in the game by made by CCP. It's not an attack against high-sec, any more than a nerf to moon goo was an attack against us (it wasn't).
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So from the perspective of the cartel leadership, who stand to profit quite nicely from this, yeah, it is an improvement. Why shouldn't we (all of us in the "cartels", not just the leadership) profit from infrastructure that thousands of us had to fight for, and that our alliance had to spend significant resources developing?
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:For everyone in high sec, it is yet another indication of the contempt and hatred null sec dev's have for the largest part of their subscription base. That's pretty funny considering null sec players probably contribute more to your subscriber base, considering that these nerfs don't actually hurt you much if at all, considering some high sec players will probably stand to profit from this, and considering that game balance is important regardless of who benefits from changes intended to restore that balance. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9194
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:41:00 -
[123] - Quote
And they're not nullsec devs. They're devs. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1228
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:50:00 -
[124] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:And they're not nullsec devs. They're devs.
Never really got the whole "Goonspiracy" thing, on how goons somehow "control" CCP.
It's weird cognitive dissonance. On one hand, our local conspiracy buffs will tell us that goons have so much powers over CCP, because with a snap of the finger, Mittens can force all goons to quit Eve, which would cost CCP all their revenue....
Yet, on the other side, CCP should never ever make changes to highsec, because the vast majority of players live in highsec and changes that benefit null are worthless to most players etc.
I mean, which is it? The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3255
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:53:00 -
[125] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:And they're not nullsec devs. They're devs. Never really got the whole "Goonspiracy" thing, on how goons somehow "control" CCP. It's weird cognitive dissonance. On one hand, our local conspiracy buffs will tell us that goons have so much powers over CCP, because with a snap of the finger, Mittens can force all goons to quit Eve, which would cost CCP all their revenue.... Yet, on the other side, CCP should never ever make changes to highsec, because the vast majority of players live in highsec and changes that benefit null are worthless to most players etc. I mean, which is it?
It's whichever one is most convenient for them to use.
It's called intellectual dishonesty. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2726
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:57:00 -
[126] - Quote
the terrible screeching of highsec apologists is just as gratifying as the change itself |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9194
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 00:58:00 -
[127] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:On one hand, our local conspiracy buffs will tell us that goons have so much powers over CCP, because with a snap of the finger, Mittens can force all goons to quit Eve, which would cost CCP all their revenue.... Of course the conspiracy buffs don't realize that if The Mittani actually told us to stop playing EVE, the majority of us would tell him to go **** himself and he'd probably be ousted.
Fortunately he's not going to. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1228
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:06:00 -
[128] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:On one hand, our local conspiracy buffs will tell us that goons have so much powers over CCP, because with a snap of the finger, Mittens can force all goons to quit Eve, which would cost CCP all their revenue.... Of course the conspiracy buffs don't realize that if The Mittani actually told us to stop playing EVE, the majority of us would tell him to go **** himself. Fortunately he's not going to.
Wait, so you're telling me Mittens DOESN'T command every movement made in the CFC?
My, my illusions are shattered now. I thought you guys all marched in lockstep to his RMT overlord demands.
Back on topic though, Devblog full of delicious changes. it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out. I will say, though, I'm loving the idea of leveling all the batches at 100. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2401
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:29:00 -
[129] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Nerfs like this are a direct attack by the null sec cartels against high sec. No, nerfs like this are a change in the game by made by CCP. It's not an attack against high-sec, any more than a nerf to moon goo was an attack against us (it wasn't). Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:So from the perspective of the cartel leadership, who stand to profit quite nicely from this, yeah, it is an improvement. Why shouldn't we (all of us in the "cartels", not just the leadership) profit from infrastructure that thousands of us had to fight for, and that our alliance had to spend significant resources developing? Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:For everyone in high sec, it is yet another indication of the contempt and hatred null sec dev's have for the largest part of their subscription base. That's pretty funny considering null sec players probably contribute more to your subscriber base, considering that these nerfs don't actually hurt you much if at all, considering some high sec players will probably stand to profit from this, and considering that game balance is important regardless of who benefits from changes intended to restore that balance.
1. The moon goo changes were not a nerf for null sec per se. The amount of ISK gained by null sec did not change. It was transferred to a different moon goo. Now, the dev's, in order to give their associates in null sec something to do, DID directly attack goons with the distribution, and force them to attack Test for a moon grab. But it turns out the cartels' overall moon goo income was not nerfed at all, even after alchemy.
2. I always laugh at the sense of entitlement so many cartel members have about what they "deserve". And how it is never enough. Sounds like a typical koch brother attitude. Taking more from all other sectors of space is somehow their birthright, no matter how much CCP has already gifted them. What is really funny is how many have joined up long after goons actually did any fighting for territory, and act like they have are some battlescarred vet of years of sov warfare.
3. And cloaking another attack against high sec as some kind of inevitable balance is ridiculous. This nerf to mission runners was not warranted in any sense, given how much has been taken from them already. Oh, and it is going to be really funny for all the causal miners when they see how much more training and implants will be needed to maintain their current income levels. Wrecking the status quo in high sec for the benefit of null sec is NOT some redress against some long term flaw. There was no flaw. Only the null sec propagandists drummed up a campaign suggesting there was a flaw.
And of course, the dev's happily obliged. And yes, their actions prove precisely where their allegiances lie. Actions speak far louder than words, and what they think of high sec and null sec. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
716
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:34:00 -
[130] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:The moon goo changes were not a nerf for null sec per se. And these changes aren't a nerf to highsec mission runners per se. eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2401
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:36:00 -
[131] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:And they're not nullsec devs. They're devs. Never really got the whole "Goonspiracy" thing, on how goons somehow "control" CCP. It's weird cognitive dissonance. On one hand, our local conspiracy buffs will tell us that goons have so much powers over CCP, because with a snap of the finger, Mittens can force all goons to quit Eve, which would cost CCP all their revenue.... Yet, on the other side, CCP should never ever make changes to highsec, because the vast majority of players live in highsec and changes that benefit null are worthless to most players etc. I mean, which is it?
Tell you what. How about we play a game.
You name dev's that were hired that played a high sec casual gamestyle, and I will name dev's that were handpicked from null sec cartels.
Let's see who makes a longer list.
And yes, when the CSM riddled with null sec cartel lobbyists gets together with the dev's that just came over from the same null sec cartels, they simply are deciding how quickly to crank up the heat on the frog. Now THAT is a delicate balance: how much they can screw high sec without causing a significant dip in sub's. Bottom line, high sec is in far far worse shape today than it was 3 or 4 years ago.
I can't believe I am actually trying to converse with a griefer from the new order. This is lunacy. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2728
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:38:00 -
[132] - Quote
dinsdale you realise that when module tiericide comes around mission runners'll be laughing when meta 1-3 stuff suddenly isn't total garbage |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3256
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:43:00 -
[133] - Quote
If you play a "highsec casual playstyle", you quite simply don't know or care enough about the game to be even remotely suited to be a dev.
It's like claiming a business is prejudiced because they don't have any gingers on their staff. Either the gingers just didn't apply, or they weren't up to snuff. Occam's Razor, yeesh. Stop trying to grab smoke to justify your hatred of the real players. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Twenty Five Percent
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:44:00 -
[134] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Tell you what. How about we play a game.
You name dev's that were hired that played a high sec casual gamestyle, and I will name dev's that were handpicked from null sec cartels.
Let's see who makes a longer list.
And yes, when the CSM riddled with null sec cartel lobbyists gets together with the dev's that just came over from the same null sec cartels, they simply are deciding how quickly to crank up the heat on the frog. Now THAT is a delicate balance: how much they can screw high sec without causing a significant dip in sub's. Bottom line, high sec is in far far worse shape today than it was 3 or 4 years ago.
I can't believe I am actually trying to converse with a griefer from the new order. This is lunacy.
I believe this is a violation of the rumour-mongering clause and a good reason to ban this idiot so we dont have to see his drivel anymore. ISD you know what to do 
|

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
717
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:45:00 -
[135] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It's like claiming a business is prejudiced because they don't have any gingers on their staff. Either the gingers just didn't apply, or they weren't up to snuff. Occam's Razor, yeesh. Stop trying to grab smoke to justify your hatred of the real players.
Don't be prejudiced
eve-bazaar - Discount prices on ships and PLEX. Real savings to drive your ISK further. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9195
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:52:00 -
[136] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Tell you what. How about we play a game.
You name dev's that were hired that played a high sec casual gamestyle Maybe you should name someone who plays exclusively in highsec who's qualified to be a dev.
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:And yes, when the CSM riddled with null sec cartel lobbyists Who are there because the players wanted them there.
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:gets together with the dev's that just came over from the same null sec cartels Who are there because they're more passionate and knowledgeable about the game than any of your highsec casuals.
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:they simply are deciding how quickly to crank up the heat on the frog. Now THAT is a delicate balance: how much they can screw high sec without causing a significant dip in sub's. There's absolutely no motivation for them to do so.
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Bottom line, high sec is in far far worse shape today than it was 3 or 4 years ago. Absolutely and blatantly false. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5282
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:54:00 -
[137] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:I like how nerf is called "significant improvements" in the article.
CCP is practically a government. At least they use the same methods of crowd control.
You do know that the two "CC" of "CCP" are truly an acronym for "Crowd Control (Productions)" right? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
61
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:56:00 -
[138] - Quote
More proof that CCP devs only play eve on their 500m SP supertoons and haven't tried starting a new toon from scratch. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9195
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:59:00 -
[139] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:More proof that CCP devs only play eve on their 500m SP supertoons and haven't tried starting a new toon from scratch. The vast majority of players, especially new players, will not even notice this change. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5282
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:59:00 -
[140] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:March rabbit wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP need to make null worth fighting for first. null-sec exists since 2003? You say players were fighting in it just for fun? And there was NEVER any reasons to fight for it at all?  Can you think of any reason to invade goon space other than because its goons?
I can't even find a reason to move out of Jita tbh. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1230
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 01:59:00 -
[141] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Tell you what. How about we play a game.
You name dev's that were hired that played a high sec casual gamestyle, and I will name dev's that were handpicked from null sec cartels.
Let's see who makes a longer list.
And yes, when the CSM riddled with null sec cartel lobbyists gets together with the dev's that just came over from the same null sec cartels, they simply are deciding how quickly to crank up the heat on the frog. Now THAT is a delicate balance: how much they can screw high sec without causing a significant dip in sub's. Bottom line, high sec is in far far worse shape today than it was 3 or 4 years ago.
I can't believe I am actually trying to converse with a griefer from the new order. This is lunacy.
I accept your game! However, in order to make a reasonable decision, I'm going to need CCPs hiring decisions and rejected candidates. I've never applied to CCP, so I'm not sure if the "nullsec cartel or casual highsec player" is part of the application. SInce you are able to make these statements on CCPs hiring policies, I'm going to assume you have this information, so share.
Until then, I counter your assertion with this: your "nullsec cartel devs" come from a pool of people who are insanely devoted to EVE, hence apply for a position when one opens. The "casual highsec player", being casual, and highsec, has no devotion, so doesn't apply.
IN fact, I can go even better, I can name a dev who NEVER EVEN PLAYED EVE, till the day she was hired. Punkturis. You don't get much more non "nullsec cartel" than that.
You're doing the equivalent of saying "OMG, why does Microsoft only hire people familiar with Microsoft programming? They need to hire some Linux devs. IT'S A CONSPIRACY!"
You didn't answer my original question though...which is it, "nullsec cartels" have such a stranglehold on CCP due to ability to influence CCPs income, or CCP needs to quit working on nullsec because the majority of EVE players are highsec? The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5282
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:00:00 -
[142] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Best solution.
Blitz and ignore loot.
Churn more missions and trade LP for all those lovely Sisters Probes and Virtual Implants and let the loot rot.
You actually make more ISK.
Sheeps all flocking to do exactly this thing will make LP drop and crash.
When it's too obvious(tm) it's a loser game. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
848
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:03:00 -
[143] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Back on topic though, Devblog full of delicious changes. it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out. I will say, though, I'm loving the idea of leveling all the batches at 100.
The pos module changes are the biggies for me. That is a huge buff to stationless dead end mining in highsec (and stationless mining in any sec). Above all else it means ore can be mined, warped to a pos, reprocced and compressed and shipped with a blockade runner. With 425mm's the BR used to shift about 450m, but it was never practical to mine the basket for 425s in any one place.
The pos modules remain blockade runner scope for yanking too - so you can deadstick a pos between sessions so it doesn't chew fuel. |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
848
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:08:00 -
[144] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And yes, when the CSM riddled with null sec cartel lobbyists gets together with the dev's that just came over from the same null sec cartels, they simply are deciding how quickly to crank up the heat on the frog. Now THAT is a delicate balance: how much they can screw high sec without causing a significant dip in sub's. Bottom line, high sec is in far far worse shape today than it was 3 or 4 years ago.
These are the most reasoned, least exploitable, least screwed up changes I have ever seen CCP contemplate. The single biggest recipient of benefit is the miner in a player corp - in any sec - which is the lowest paid profession.
Also its is now possible to efficiently mine and salvage in my system, so I can literally contemplate recruiting a miner or a low sp salvager. It is no longer ridiculously logistically infeasible for them to do so, and I can support their activities with very occasional use of the one hauler I am happy to use in null - the viator. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5282
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:12:00 -
[145] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: Until then, I counter your assertion with this: your "nullsec cartel devs" come from a pool of people who are insanely devoted to EVE, hence apply for a position when one opens. The "casual highsec player", being casual, and highsec, has no devotion, so doesn't apply.
It's lovely how you can square the playerbase in such precise brackets:
- Hi sec player for you (and not just you) = a poor moron who should possibly die in a fire ASAP. No knowledge of the game, no passion he's just playing EvE by random chance, in between of WoW PvE sessions. He's also a nerd, 15 old and he'll become a red neck.
- Null sec: divinity incarnated with passion and vast knowledge of thegame. Tall, blonde, and blue eyed, bound to become an Hollywood personality, girls fall on their knees as he passes by.
Did I picture it well enough?
It never occurs to you that maybe the "random hi seccer noob-should-defintely-die-young" maybe is a 3 children father who actually got a life so he has to put those as top priority instead of showing "heroic devotion"?
Now, please return to your "CODE" and spew some more verdicts on macro-categories. It fits with the organization.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3259
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:16:00 -
[146] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote: Until then, I counter your assertion with this: your "nullsec cartel devs" come from a pool of people who are insanely devoted to EVE, hence apply for a position when one opens. The "casual highsec player", being casual, and highsec, has no devotion, so doesn't apply.
It's lovely how you can square the playerbase in such precise brackets: - Hi sec player for you (and not just you) = a poor moron who should possibly die in a fire ASAP. No knowledge of the game, no passion he's just playing EvE by random chance, in between of WoW PvE sessions. He's also a nerd, 15 old and he'll become a red neck. - Null sec: divinity incarnated with passion and vast knowledge of thegame. Tall, blonde, and blue eyed, bound to become an Hollywood personality, girls fall on their knees as he passes by. Did I picture it well enough? It never occurs to you that maybe the "random hi seccer noob-should-defintely-die-young" maybe is a 3 children father who actually got a life so he has to put those as top priority instead of showing "heroic devotion"? Now, please return to your "CODE" and spew some more verdicts on macro-categories. It fits with the organization.
Talk about your strawman. She didn't say "go die", or anything of the sort. In fact, she's easily one of the most polite people I've ever encountered in EVE.
You're just wildly grasping for something to prop up your bullshit arguments.
So I'll spell it out for you. If you're a "highsec player" you do not know or care enough about the game to be remotely qualifed to be a dev.
It's the same reason why nullsec has more CSM chairs. Because you halfwits can't figure out how to vote, or you can't be asked.
The end. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1232
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:19:00 -
[147] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Back on topic though, Devblog full of delicious changes. it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out. I will say, though, I'm loving the idea of leveling all the batches at 100.
The pos module changes are the biggies for me. That is a huge buff to stationless dead end mining in highsec (and stationless mining in any sec). Above all else it means ore can be mined, warped to a pos, reprocced and compressed and shipped with a blockade runner. With 425mm's the BR used to shift about 450m, but it was never practical to mine the basket for 425s in any one place. The pos modules remain blockade runner scope for yanking too - so you can deadstick a pos between sessions so it doesn't chew fuel.
I'm interested in seeing just how much more industry this change kicks up, across all secs. Minerals are almost like a psuedo currency in EVE, so anything that makes moving minerals around is going to encourage more use.
It'd be funny if the mineral market got even stronger, due to ease of moving mins to null for supercap construction. Grrr, those evil nullsec cartels, making things better for people. Grr I say! The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3259
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:23:00 -
[148] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Tauranon wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Back on topic though, Devblog full of delicious changes. it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out. I will say, though, I'm loving the idea of leveling all the batches at 100.
The pos module changes are the biggies for me. That is a huge buff to stationless dead end mining in highsec (and stationless mining in any sec). Above all else it means ore can be mined, warped to a pos, reprocced and compressed and shipped with a blockade runner. With 425mm's the BR used to shift about 450m, but it was never practical to mine the basket for 425s in any one place. The pos modules remain blockade runner scope for yanking too - so you can deadstick a pos between sessions so it doesn't chew fuel. I'm interested in seeing just how much more industry this change kicks up, across all secs. Minerals are almost like a psuedo currency in EVE, so anything that makes moving minerals around is going to encourage more use. It'd be funny if the mineral market got even stronger, due to ease of moving mins to null for supercap construction. Grrr, those evil nullsec cartels, making things better for people. Grr I say!
I personally know several people who are slavering over this change, if only because compression blueprints were the stupidest thing ever. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5282
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:27:00 -
[149] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Talk about your strawman. She didn't say "go die", or anything of the sort. In fact, she's easily one of the most polite people I've ever encountered in EVE.
You're just wildly grasping for something to prop up your bullshit arguments.
So I'll spell it out for you. If you're a "highsec player" you do not know or care enough about the game to be remotely qualifed to be a dev.
It's the same reason why nullsec has more CSM chairs. Because you halfwits can't figure out how to vote, or you can't be asked.
The end.
I have no arguments to prop up.
In ANY CASE I shall make massive money, either on the likes of her, on miners and on you.
Also, I have always voted people who are estimated, famous EvE software creators and they know EvE well enough to have reverse engineered the formulas so STFU with your own BS propaganda.
It's not because "nullsec" are more qualified or anything, it's just demographics that CCP runs and found out which playerbase to push. It's not grand player qualities like you delude yourself a category got, but large number law of paying subscribers fidelization and other marketing department material.
CCP means Crowd Control Production and you are exactly their ideal target. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
3259
|
Posted - 2014.03.21 02:30:00 -
[150] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Talk about your strawman. She didn't say "go die", or anything of the sort. In fact, she's easily one of the most polite people I've ever encountered in EVE.
You're just wildly grasping for something to prop up your bullshit arguments.
So I'll spell it out for you. If you're a "highsec player" you do not know or care enough about the game to be remotely qualifed to be a dev.
It's the same reason why nullsec has more CSM chairs. Because you halfwits can't figure out how to vote, or you can't be asked.
The end.
I have no arguments to prop up. In ANY CASE I shall make massive money, either on the likes of her, on miners and on you. Also, I have always voted people who are estimated, famous EvE software creators and they know EvE well enough to have reverse engineered the formulas so STFU with your own BS propaganda. It's not because "nullsec" are more qualified or anything, it's just demographics that CCP runs and found out which playerbase to push. It's not grand player qualities like you delude yourself a category got, but large number law of paying subscribers fidelization and other marketing department material. CCP means Crowd Control Production and you are exactly their ideal target.
I don't speak street corner derelict, can anyone translate this for me? Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á
Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 67 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |