Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Maeltstome
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
430
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
Without going into too much detail, it seems like it might be worth seriously considering. Becoming GOOD at eve takes time, but that is also relative. If you play every day for 10 hours you WILL get better... only to be hindered by the arbitrary number that is 'Skill points'.
I've been playing since 2006'ish and I want to see a new influx of players or a way for newer players to accelerate themselfs to keep interest in the game. I've spent years training skills and it doesn't feel like an accomplishment. All i had to do was auto renew a subscription. What i've DONE in Eve feels like an accomplishment.
Perhaps offering 1 months subscription cost for 1 months worth of skillpoints (based on char stats) into your unassigned pool would be a possible way to ensure that old players got the same number of SP for every penny/cent they spent as a new player does. None of this makes new players better at the game or more financially sound... just gives them access to more ships/bonuses/market-opportunities. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
556
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
hmmm Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3922
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
I stopped reading there, mainly because your friend is a moron.
A 1 week old character can fly a properly fitted ship for what is he wants to do.
Even if you could dump over 5k dollar into the game and buy a blinged out Navy Raven, you will still be ganked. Because you can not buy knowledge and actual skills (not skillpoints).
Also, your friend is a moron in terms of that he can already dump his money in game and buy a character with good skillpoints, if he does, let me know what the name is so I can await the big loss because your friend doesn't know HOW to use the skillpoints.
0/10
p.s. Next time, just say YOU want P2W and don't hide behind imaginary friends Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3922
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote: I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Wait...whut?
You have obviously no idea what you are talking about.
I've seen less then 2 month olds get kills (or made kills possible) as good as veterans do.
Hell, just last month I was dueling with a new player (as in under 1 month old) that knew what he was doing with his ship. He couldn't hit me (because of the tracks and high speed orbit) but his tank was too big for my ship to break, so in the end...we had to call it a draw as if it wasn't for downtimes and depletion of ammo (neither was using lasers) we would have still been there in the exact same situation. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Thomas Builder
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
455
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
While I'm not totally against the idea to pay to "catch up" with characters created at launch: You can kinda already do that by buying an old character on the bazaar.
And you do overestimate the amount of gain skill points bring. You can get enough skill points in 3 months of focussed training to decently pilot any specific sub-capital ship. While you might get a bit more performance with a couple more lvl 5 skills, that's usually not that important, unless you are fighting someone in the same ship. But in a fight between different ships, the ship strengths are more important than skill points. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17678
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 18:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
I can give you one good reason why a Pay 2 Win Eve will never work.
A newbie with a 30 million SP character and the ships to go with them is still a newbie.
@Ralph King-Griffin gief Indy gif.. MINE.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
560
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 19:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
what's particularly poignant about that story is the scam afterwards was much worse than the gank, and infinitely easier to avoid. tell you what john, ill trade you this, this and ill raise you this Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Chad Ramsbottom
University of Caille Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 19:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships..
If he doesn't understand why making that complaint makes him stupid, this game isn't for him. |

Klymer
Hedion University Amarr Empire
533
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 19:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
EVE is not for everyone, too bad OP still thinks it's for him and makes posts like this. |

Zanzbar
The Elysian Knights League of Infamy
200
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 20:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
anybody have a link to that evenews24 story about the guy who purchsed a moros pilot after only a month and tried to take on a nyx solo with it? its one of my favorite examples how money and skillpoints cant buy you what you gain from actual experiance. |
|

Praxis Ginimic
Dead Men Rising Ushra'Khan
784
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 20:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Maeltstome wrote:A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships. I stopped reading there, mainly because your friend is a moron. A 1 week old character can fly a properly fitted ship for what is he wants to do. Even if you could dump over 5k dollar into the game and buy a blinged out Navy Raven, you will still be ganked. Because you can not buy knowledge and actual skills (not skillpoints). Also, your friend is a moron in terms of that he can already dump his money in game and buy a character with good skillpoints, if he does, let me know what the name is so I can await the big loss because your friend doesn't know HOW to use the skillpoints. 0/10 p.s. Next time, just say YOU want P2W and don't hide behind imaginary friends
That |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
5091
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 20:36:00 -
[12] - Quote
Part of the idea behind the "wait" to use "better" and more expensive equipment is that a newbie must first learn how to properly use the "cheaper"/"crappier" equipment effectively. In other words... newbies are being forced (or "challenged") to use their noggins to compensate for their lacking skills and/or wealth.
This helps immensely later on when they gain access to their "powerful" ships and equipment... because by this point they should have learned that while they can stomp another newbie one on one... they will DIAF against 5+ of them... and that no amount of raw skillpoints or "sexy stats" are going to save them against superior numbers and/or "tactics." Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Gregor Parud
409
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 20:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
OP needs his assets removed by his CEO, awoxed, kicked from his corp, have all his alts outed, have his JC destroyed and camped into a station without a medical till he's down to 900k SP.
We as a community need to make this happen, for the betterment of the game. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3923
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 21:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
Thanks Jonah.
I was wondering how not to break forum rules regarding a killboard link about Mr. Raven, totally forgot about the mittani post. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3923
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 21:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
Gregor Parud wrote:OP needs his assets removed by his CEO, awoxed, kicked from his corp, have all his alts outed, have his JC destroyed and camped into a station without a medical till he's down to 900k SP.
We as a community need to make this happen, for the betterment of the game.
Although I usually like to give new players some slack and hope they improve...sometimes people need to learn the hard way. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17683
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 21:21:00 -
[16] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Thanks Jonah. I was wondering how not to break forum rules regarding a killboard link about Mr. Raven, totally forgot about the mittani post. So much purple on that ship, it was a loot pi+¦ata waiting to happen.
P2W won't work in Eve, because we won't let it.
|

Xylem Viliana
Protomonolithic
175
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 22:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w? |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3925
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 22:58:00 -
[18] - Quote
Xylem Viliana wrote:Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w?
Naah, it's Pay 2 Expensive loss with foolish fit. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Xylem Viliana
Protomonolithic
175
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 23:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Xylem Viliana wrote:Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w? Naah, it's Pay 2 Expensive loss with foolish fit.
Meh same difference really. Buy SP boosts or buy a premade char. Always gonna end in stupid losses. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2450
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 23:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
Paid cheating is a cancer in gaming.
EVE's pretty good on this - player knowledge is so much more important than character power or character resources that anyone that engages in RMT (either sanctioned RMT through massive purchases of PLEX or illicit RMT) ends up as a hilarious lossmail. But I've left other MMOs in the past over the levels of paid cheating in them and the way the game was shaped around pushing more and more microtransactions. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5158
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 00:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
Xylem Viliana wrote:Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w?
That provides exactly what the OP is after: SP for ISK.
The OP also needs to learn more about what it takes to get kills in EVE Online before suggesting that a few-days-old character can't get kills. There was a famous video about two pilots taking day-old characters in Rifters out to Providence and having a hell of a time. Sadly I don't have it bookmarked, nor can I find it :\
edit: an alternative to P2W by buying SP would be to remove SP altogether. You just buy the skill books and fly whatever ship you can afford. Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5158
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 00:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Here's a video of day-old pilots in a fleet heading out to have some fun: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs-D_TwtiJ
And here is a 8yo girl being a pirate (flying a punisher, nothing special): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guNrJ5hj0aQ
And here is another example of EVE being very Pay 2 Win unfriendly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GEp387tXp8
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Seraphi Nephalis
Seraphi Nephalis Corporation
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 00:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote: edit: an alternative to P2W by buying SP would be to remove SP altogether. You just buy the skill books and fly whatever ship you can afford.
I would much prefer a system that augmented the SP system by awarding you bonus SP based on what your pilot in the game is actually doing. Not sure how it could be implemented, since there are so many different things that can be done in EVE.
|

Iria Ahrens
Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
325
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 01:07:00 -
[24] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Xylem Viliana wrote:Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w? That provides exactly what the OP is after: SP for ISK. The OP also needs to learn more about what it takes to get kills in EVE Online before suggesting that a few-days-old character can't get kills. There was a famous video about two pilots taking day-old characters in Rifters out to Providence and having a hell of a time. Sadly I don't have it bookmarked, nor can I find it :\ edit: an alternative to P2W by buying SP would be to remove SP altogether. You just buy the skill books and fly whatever ship you can afford.
I keep some favorites in my in-game profile including that one.
Drat, for some reason the other links I had in my profile are missing from my profile in evegate, hopefully they show up in game, but I don't have time to update my client before my ship leaves. :( Because you disdained all my counsel, and my reproof you ignoredGÇö I, in my turn, will laugh at your doom; will mock when terror overtakes you; -- Ultimate Griefer's Handbook |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
5091
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 01:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
Seraphi Nephalis wrote:Mara Rinn wrote: edit: an alternative to P2W by buying SP would be to remove SP altogether. You just buy the skill books and fly whatever ship you can afford.
I would much prefer a system that augmented the SP system by awarding you bonus SP based on what your pilot in the game is actually doing. Not sure how it could be implemented, since there are so many different things that can be done in EVE. This was actually part of the game early in its life. What happened was...
- it discouraged activities that were not "activity based." Some examples; --- a logistics officer in a corporation would not be training their combat skills as fast as "rookies" would be because they can't shoot and haul stuff at the same time... even though their work is often more important. --- a diplomat who deals with different people all day usually doesn't have time to go out and do anything "active." And no one would want to replace him/her because it would require time that they can better spend grinding SP.
- it encouraged "power grinding" versus actually playing the game. Because which will bring you greater guaranteed benefits; Mindlessly farming NPCs for more SP and ISK? Experimenting with a new ship setup that may or may not work? Roaming around aimlessly for a PvP fight that may or may not happen?
- players abused it... badly. For example; if 2 players wanted high gunnery and active tank skills they would both set their ships up to perma-tank and not deal enough damage to break each others tank... then they would warp out to a safe-spot, aggress each other, and then go afk for a couple hours. Rinse an repeat for all skills. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
5158
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 01:33:00 -
[26] - Quote
That's why I can't find it on YouTube: it's not on YouTube  Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Lost Greybeard
Drunken Yordles
504
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 01:40:00 -
[27] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far.
If you can't do the math to know that this isn't even remotely true, maybe Eve isn't the game for you? I mean, it's barely even arithmetic... maybe try a shooter instead? Those don't really require the ability to add or multiply, and I hear Dust is pretty decent. |

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
431
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 11:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ooofft, lots of hate, personal attacks, extreme edge case scenarios etc. - I knew this would be a hot topic but I didn't expect it to take off quite so quickly.
I'm also pleasantly surprised that amidst the anger and bile most people where inherently agreeing with the base concept of why this idea isn't game breaking:
Buying SP doesn't make you a better pilot. It doesn't give you any experience in HOW to play eve or how to be successful. Players with years of experience can use trial accounts to get good kills in PVP. This is an excellent example of how experience trumps skill points in almost every situation - further developing the notion that buying SP would not give a player any real advantage due to a fundamental experience gap.
Even more accurately, having SP to spend doesn't mean they will even spend it on the 'right' things - but they will get what they want and if this brings them enjoyment then all power to them.
However - and here is the kicker: Having the SP to fly effective ships (especially during a meta switch e.g. when HML's where nerfed or when Marauders where buffed) can open up opportunities for players to GET experience. Being able to fly a fleet-doctrine ship can take weeks/months for players who start with a deficit. Equally someone who very quickly nails PVE and enjoys it (missions/incursions/explo-sites) and makes good money from it is stopped from moving into the next level because a larger ship requires an arbitrary amount of time to achieve the required 'break points' of DPS/Tank etc. that the more advances challenges require.
SP <> Skill. That applies to people who are 1 week old and people who are 10 years into the game. Just because you have 200M SP I wont think you're a good pilot. I'll just this you auto-renew a subscription.
Anyway - bring on the flames. It seems people get really but-hurt over the prospect of easily to kill newbies in shiny ships... |

Oshia Launay
Galactic Fringe Inc
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 13:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction? No thanks.
Generalizing the idea that rank 5 skills should merely provide those last few bonus points for people looking to fully maximize their stats in one area or another, as opposed to unlocking all sort of tier 2 goodness, whether tech 2 modules, ships or 'advanced' skills, would go a long way towards making the gap between long time veterans and new players smaller.
|

Balshem Rozenzweig
Akademia Milicyjna The North is Coming
37
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 13:46:00 -
[30] - Quote
Gap is huge and takes a lot to seal, but you might be looking at it in a wrong way.
1) every class of ships have limited SP you can allocate in it. You can be competitive frigate pilot in 2 months. You will be however limited to that ship 2) skills give only so much and you tend to loose by tens of percents not just few of them. Fights when that +5% armor matters are rare tbh. It's more of a rock - paper - scissors thing when it comes to eve 3) even really new players are good for fleets. Tracking disruptors, dampeners and ECM work almost exactly as well no matter who's using them. You don't even have to fly an ewar ship to use them (well - maybe with ECM it is needed). You join a fleet of cruisers with your pitiful frigate, and then destroy optimal/tracking of the target. It works. 4)I found that isk is more of a problem in FW zone than SP. You need cash to keep these navy frigs comming. Still - I used kestrel and condor for 5 months and lived with it. I even killed stuff solo.
P2W makes me angry cause there's no limit to that usually. I prefer subscriptions cause they are fair. Spending countless cash on gear/ammo would make me quit in literally 1 day. Singature Radius 48 m |
|

Leoric Firesword
Dark Fusion Industries Limitless Inc.
16
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 14:08:00 -
[31] - Quote
first
this is features and ideas, not new citizens.
second no
I've got less than a year under my belt, in that time I have switched training from my main twice to do PI alts. I'm more than happy with how I can fit ships and what ships I can fly.
Your friends need to HTFU |

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
431
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 14:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Balshem Rozenzweig wrote:Gap is huge and takes a lot to seal, but you might be looking at it in a wrong way.
1) every class of ships have limited SP you can allocate in it. You can be competitive frigate pilot in 2 months. You will be however limited to that ship 2) skills give only so much and you tend to loose by tens of percents not just few of them. Fights when that +5% armor matters are rare tbh. It's more of a rock - paper - scissors thing when it comes to eve 3) even really new players are good for fleets. Tracking disruptors, dampeners and ECM work almost exactly as well no matter who's using them. You don't even have to fly an ewar ship to use them (well - maybe with ECM it is needed). You join a fleet of cruisers with your pitiful frigate, and then destroy optimal/tracking of the target. It works. 4)I found that isk is more of a problem in FW zone than SP. You need cash to keep these navy frigs comming. Still - I used kestrel and condor for 5 months and lived with it. I even killed stuff solo.
P2W makes me angry cause there's no limit to that usually. I prefer subscriptions cause they are fair. Spending countless cash on gear/ammo would make me quit in literally 1 day.
Some really good points - I'll reply to them since you took a lot of time to make a solid contribution to the thread.
1) Total agree - however support skills that a non-ship-specific make a big difference. 2) Agree'd. but there isn't just 1 5% skill - there are a few dousen - especially in frigates. A small ammount of extra fitting, shield, hull etc. can all add up to a BIG advantage. 3) Real alliances run SRP's to replace expensive, high SP ships - it is frowned upon or outright not acceptable to bring something along the lines of what your talking about. Also: What if the pilot doesn't want to be a 'Space Healer'? What if they don't want to be the 'Support who wards'? 4) What you fly should be based on what you can afford - increasing your SP results in no ISK gain if you don't know HOW to earn money efficiently - that wouldn't change.
Also "Pay 2 Win" was an ironic statement: Because older players have paid for years and have a multitude of advantages that a new player doesn't have even if they had identical SP. It's actually closer to "Pay to catch up" |

Balshem Rozenzweig
Akademia Milicyjna The North is Coming
37
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 15:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Balshem Rozenzweig wrote:Gap is huge and takes a lot to seal, but you might be looking at it in a wrong way.
1) every class of ships have limited SP you can allocate in it. You can be competitive frigate pilot in 2 months. You will be however limited to that ship 2) skills give only so much and you tend to loose by tens of percents not just few of them. Fights when that +5% armor matters are rare tbh. It's more of a rock - paper - scissors thing when it comes to eve 3) even really new players are good for fleets. Tracking disruptors, dampeners and ECM work almost exactly as well no matter who's using them. You don't even have to fly an ewar ship to use them (well - maybe with ECM it is needed). You join a fleet of cruisers with your pitiful frigate, and then destroy optimal/tracking of the target. It works. 4)I found that isk is more of a problem in FW zone than SP. You need cash to keep these navy frigs comming. Still - I used kestrel and condor for 5 months and lived with it. I even killed stuff solo.
P2W makes me angry cause there's no limit to that usually. I prefer subscriptions cause they are fair. Spending countless cash on gear/ammo would make me quit in literally 1 day. Some really good points - I'll reply to them since you took a lot of time to make a solid contribution to the thread. 1) Total agree - however support skills that a non-ship-specific make a big difference. 2) Agree'd. but there isn't just 1 5% skill - there are a few dousen - especially in frigates. A small ammount of extra fitting, shield, hull etc. can all add up to a BIG advantage. 3) Real alliances run SRP's to replace expensive, high SP ships - it is frowned upon or outright not acceptable to bring something along the lines of what your talking about. Also: What if the pilot doesn't want to be a 'Space Healer'? What if they don't want to be the 'Support who wards'? 4) What you fly should be based on what you can afford - increasing your SP results in no ISK gain if you don't know HOW to earn money efficiently - that wouldn't change. Also "Pay 2 Win" was an ironic statement: Because older players have paid for years and have a multitude of advantages that a new player doesn't have even if they had identical SP. It's actually closer to "Pay to catch up"
1) yes - but it takes a lot longer to take them from IV to V that it did to bring them from 0-IV. Because of that you might expect the other dude will not have them maxed either, and if he does - that it's still just a couple of %. Don't get me wrong - he will be better and will have easier time, I just think that predicting correctly what the other guy has and attacking him with counter fit gives you better adventage than counting on him having inferior skills. 2) good point. Sadly you are right here. Still - you can sacrifice under a month to get some important skills maxed. Other than that - you could use meta. Expensive and inferior, but not by a margin of unplayable. 3) Well - hard core alliances will not accept a newbie anyway. Too much teaching, too much of an SP requirement (from what I've seen - they demend sth like 20M +). It's different recruitment target realy so I think this point is not realy valid. 4) ISK profit depends strongly on knowing the meta (or generally - game environment). CCP should do better job at making new players experience more educating. They should also update those shamelessly lying wiki pages (or give me the isk I lost because of them back, damm it!)
Any form of p2w boosting will be heavily abused by older players. As things are currently - it would prolly be available for isk (plex) so they would be winning without realy paying. People are just like that.
Even if you restrict SP (or anything else tbh) boosting to younger characters it will act as a detterant, because they will feel like they were sucked dry by a game that doesn't offer nothing but subscription fees and microtransactions.
Also - maybe it's just me but when I see gold ammo, and I know I will never use it, I loose my will to play because I suspect that I will keep meeting people who outpaced me. This is were the feeling that "there's a gap I will never close" is for me.
As for power balance - yeah. EVE is about older players feeding of newbies :D You sell to them, you buy from them, you kill/pod them, and then you manipulate the market. But you can look at EVE from other perspective - detoxication after too much time in wow-clones. Singature Radius 48 m |

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
431
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 16:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
Nothing particularly shocking to read - all good points. I think the balance issues are almost self-fixing in most of the instances you've pointed out.
As you've said most skills trained to level 4 are sufficient to perform well, so a new player who intelligently trained 5-10 skills using (e.g.) 1-million 'Bought' SP would gain a lot more than someone who its 5 years into the game and is buying 'Caldari Dreadnaught 5'. The amount of SP required to go from level 1-4 is tiny compared to 4-5, it's almost exponential actually. The SP system favours starting a skill rather than perfecting it.
RMT is rife in ALL online games - offering 'SP-4-Cash' is simply not a service third-party company can offer. It's also considerably more 'Micro' than buying a character with 10's of millions of SP that you don't want 90% of... you just want, for example, lvl4 for all your gunnery support skills. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3933
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 16:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Ooofft, lots of hate, personal attacks, extreme edge case scenarios etc. - I knew this would be a hot topic but I didn't expect it to take off quite so quickly.
I'm also pleasantly surprised that amidst the anger and bile most people where inherently agreeing with the base concept of why this idea isn't game breaking:
Buying SP doesn't make you a better pilot. It doesn't give you any experience in HOW to play eve or how to be successful. Players with years of experience can use trial accounts to get good kills in PVP. This is an excellent example of how experience trumps skill points in almost every situation - further developing the notion that buying SP would not give a player any real advantage due to a fundamental experience gap.
Even more accurately, having SP to spend doesn't mean they will even spend it on the 'right' things - but they will get what they want and if this brings them enjoyment then all power to them.
However - and here is the kicker: Having the SP to fly effective ships (especially during a meta switch e.g. when HML's where nerfed or when Marauders where buffed) can open up opportunities for players to GET experience. Being able to fly a fleet-doctrine ship can take weeks/months for players who start with a deficit. Equally someone who very quickly nails PVE and enjoys it (missions/incursions/explo-sites) and makes good money from it is stopped from moving into the next level because a larger ship requires an arbitrary amount of time to achieve the required 'break points' of DPS/Tank etc. that the more advances challenges require.
SP <> Skill. That applies to people who are 1 week old and people who are 10 years into the game. Just because you have 200M SP I wont think you're a good pilot. I'll just this you auto-renew a subscription.
Anyway - bring on the flames. It seems people get really but-hurt over the prospect of easily to kill newbies in shiny ships...
Too bad you fail to so that even when you are training for ship "x" with fit "y" you can be useful in other ways.
When I first started to PvP, I could by far fly the doctrine ships required, but unlike you, I didn't complain about it and asked for P2W.
I just asked, what can I do to assist. I flew similar style ships or just tackle ships till I was on par with the doctrine. Nothing stops you from being useful, even if you can't fly the exact doctrine fit. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3934
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 16:39:00 -
[36] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote: 1) Total agree - however support skills that a non-ship-specific make a big difference. 2) Agree'd. but there isn't just 1 5% skill - there are a few dousen - especially in frigates. A small ammount of extra fitting, shield, hull etc. can all add up to a BIG advantage. 3) Real alliances run SRP's to replace expensive, high SP ships - it is frowned upon or outright not acceptable to bring something along the lines of what your talking about. Also: What if the pilot doesn't want to be a 'Space Healer'? What if they don't want to be the 'Support who wards'? 4) What you fly should be based on what you can afford - increasing your SP results in no ISK gain if you don't know HOW to earn money efficiently - that wouldn't change.
Also "Pay 2 Win" was an ironic statement: Because older players have paid for years and have a multitude of advantages that a new player doesn't have even if they had identical SP. It's actually closer to "Pay to catch up"
1. Support skills to 4 only take about an extra month. 2. Nope. They do not match up in such a big difference they make a BIG difference. Someone with 2 weeks of experience and level 4 skills will kill someone who bought those SP to get level 5. 3. Uhm, then you are in a **** alliance. The ones I been in did SRP if you brought a ship that was useful in the doctrine, it didn't have to be the exact same fit as long as it was in line of what the doctrine was based upon. 4. So, why would you want to buy SP then. That's the beauty of the current system, with the time you get the SP to fly a ship, you also get the time to earn it, you just proven that your entire point of buying SP is useless... Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3934
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 16:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Balshem Rozenzweig wrote: Any form of p2w boosting will be heavily abused by older players.
This.
You also totally forgot about Malcanis' Law. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Noxisia Arkana
Deadspace Knights
292
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 16:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
I love all the lists! All we need now are graphs.
The character Bazaar + Plex give you all the 'pay to win' mechanics that you really need. You can buy a 100 million skillpoint character today and 'pimp' to taste any ship that pilot can fly.
This at least gives some level of balance that that 100 mil character is going to have a history and can't have a name change.
Realistically you could probably spend 100-200 bucks and get a pretty good pilot + whatever ship you wanted to fly (sub-cap).
Any new player that I've ever seen buy a toon off the character bazaar in their first month or two of playing usually quits the game. A different pay to win mechanic may bring more players in, but it won't keep more players. What would the challenge be? |

Ethikos
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 01:43:00 -
[39] - Quote
Besides, as has been mentioned above "Pay to Win" is a flawed concept for EvE in any case. EvE PvP is to complex and to intricate for any "Pay to Win" scenario. Newer players look at more expensive ships / modules and think they automatically better over the cheaper versions. A better way to look at EvE ships and fits is like classes in other MMOs. Each has their role and will succeed in a given circumstance. Beyond that, as was mentioned above the "player skill" in EvE simple can not be purchased. There is to much to learn. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=266074 - Sniggwaffe (Waffles)
|

Kronenbourg Strasbourg
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 04:17:00 -
[40] - Quote
I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through).
1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment
2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!"
3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards
I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser.
Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right  |
|

Yarda Black
Epidemic. Nulli Secunda
107
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 10:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
No
No
Some more; No
|

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3939
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 22:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through). 1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment 2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!" 3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser. Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right 
Just here to confirm that this new player is indeed right. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Tosawa Komarui
Useless Incorporated QUIET TIME.
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 07:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Thomas Builder wrote:While I'm not totally against the idea to pay to "catch up" with characters created at launch: You can kinda already do that by buying an old character on the bazaar.
And you do overestimate the amount of gain skill points bring. You can get enough skill points in 3 months of focussed training to decently pilot any specific sub-capital ship. While you might get a bit more performance with a couple more lvl 5 skills, that's usually not that important, unless you are fighting someone in the same ship. But in a fight between different ships, the ship strengths are more important than skill points.
this is a lie, there is no heavy assault cruiser you can fly in 3 months at any playable level
please dont feed crap like this into discussions about skill training taking ages (which it very much does for quite a lot of sub capital ships), your not the only one who has said this either. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17697
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 13:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through). 1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment 2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!" 3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser. Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right  Just here to confirm that this new player is indeed right. And rapidly proving that he not too stupid to play Eve, despite his initial impression 
|

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
431
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 14:57:00 -
[45] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:J'Poll wrote:Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through). 1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment 2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!" 3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser. Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right  Just here to confirm that this new player is indeed right. And rapidly proving that he not too stupid to play Eve, despite his initial impression 
Of course - Eve requires a particular Mind Set to attract people. the ability to accelerate skill training would not change this.
More to the point, people are getting a little derailed: I'm highlighting that right clicking an object, choosing "train skill" and then waiting and fixed amount of time is unrewarding game-play. Taking part in a variety of activities without fear of 'loosing time' however seems to make more sense.
Eve has a lot of flavour - it can take months to reach an SP break-point to be effective at a lot of these things (e.g. what if you DONT want to PVP in a frig?). In that time I wouldn't blame some people for becoming disenfranchised with the skill system despite the game play. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3942
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 16:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote: Of course - Eve requires a particular Mind Set to attract people. the ability to accelerate skill training would not change this.
More to the point, people are getting a little derailed: I'm highlighting that right clicking an object, choosing "train skill" and then waiting and fixed amount of time is unrewarding game-play. Taking part in a variety of activities without fear of 'loosing time' however seems to make more sense.
Eve has a lot of flavour - it can take months to reach an SP break-point to be effective at a lot of these things (e.g. what if you DONT want to PVP in a frig?). In that time I wouldn't blame some people for becoming disenfranchised with the skill system despite the game play.
Let me clarify:
A. YOU don't think it's a good system B. YOU think it's unrewarding, YOU want a XP grind game. C. YOU think and fail doing it, that it takes months to do something.
Ergo, it's YOUR opinions and YOUR flawed logic.
As for your last point
I want to drive a Formula 1 car...Can I do that now, I don't want to learn how to drive in a normal and other smaller class cars first. Same idea, same result...start small and work your way up. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Seraph Essael
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
516
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 16:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Maeltstome wrote: I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Wait...whut? You have obviously no idea what you are talking about. I've seen less then 2 month olds get kills (or made kills possible) as good as veterans do. This. So much this. A guy in my alliance who I take out on roams and flies with a few others is top of the Killboards this month. He's about 2 months in... Quoted from Doc Fury: "Concerned citizens: Doc seldom plays EVE on the weekends during spring and summer, so you will always be on your own for a couple days a week. Doc spends that time collecting kittens for the on-going sacrifices, engaging in reckless outdoor activities, and speaking in the 3rd person." |

Logan Dufrais
H.E.L.P.e.R Astraeaus
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 19:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
The other thing to consider here is how broken this would be for experienced players' alts. Someone who knows a lot about making isk in the game could level a sidekick account super efficiently to make a ton of isk for not a lot of work. It's the same concept that prevents players from training industrial ships on a trial account, for example. I also think that pay to win is a slippery slope that leads to player laziness, especially in a player driven economy like eve that is based on hard work. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3943
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 20:31:00 -
[49] - Quote
Logan Dufrais wrote:The other thing to consider here is how broken this would be for experienced players' alts. Someone who knows a lot about making isk in the game could level a sidekick account super efficiently to make a ton of isk for not a lot of work. It's the same concept that prevents players from training industrial ships on a trial account, for example. I also think that pay to win is a slippery slope that leads to player laziness, especially in a player driven economy like eve that is based on hard work.
Ergo...Malcanis' Law Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

ginger jon
University of Caille Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 20:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
no, i don't think they should make things easier for new players, it would be a kick in the teeth for veterans.
in most online games noobs get their bums handed to them on a plate, this is the nature of the beast when it comes to online gaming..
i used to play an old flight sim called air attack, i put 10 years or more into it and got to be really good at it, if some guy who had been playing for 6 months was suddenly given upgrades for his plane to be able to compete with me id have felt robbed.
the good thing about eve though is that noobs are catered for very well unlike most other games i can think of.
|
|
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1109

|
Posted - 2014.04.06 21:11:00 -
[51] - Quote
This thread has been moved to General Discussion, as it is not a discussion that is at place in EvE New Citizens Q&A. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20496
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 21:26:00 -
[52] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction? No. Largely because the problem you've invented there doesn't actually exist. There is no gulf that can't already trivially be closed by new players, nor is there any mechanic to do so that won't be abused to hell or back by old players. Your problem is that you're operating on a completely erroneous SP = XP assumption, as well as a GÇ¥more = betterGÇ¥ assumption that many obsolete class/level-based RPG systems employ. EVE does not use such a system and does not suffer from the problems that are inherent with them. What you're suggesting, however, creates many of those problems GÇö that's not a good thing.
Maeltstome wrote:I'm also pleasantly surprised that amidst the anger and bile most people where inherently agreeing with the base concept of why this idea isn't game breaking:
Buying SP doesn't make you a better pilot. It doesn't give you any experience in HOW to play eve or how to be successful. No, that's not why your idea isn't game-breaking (which it is); what they're describing is the reason why your idea is unnecessary and ill-informed. It doesn't solve anything and it only allows people who have the experience to bypass all the mechanics put into place to ensure that even they will be limited in what they can do at any given time.
Balshem Rozenzweig wrote:Gap is huge and takes a lot to seal, but you might be looking at it in a wrong way. The gap is actually pretty small and not only easy to seal, but unavoidable. The reasons you list are part of what makes it so. You're missing out the really important bit, though: the (massively) diminishing returns that make it hard to become better in any relevant way in any given area, but easy to become good enough in a large number of them at once.
Being able to speed up SP accumulation will remove all of those balancing mechanics and give older players such vast and immediate advantages over new ones that it borders on farcical. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
368
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 21:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
No.
Do you have any more questions? I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
552
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 21:42:00 -
[54] - Quote
why would you even ask this question? are you a noob? -á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
4460
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:01:00 -
[55] - Quote
Not only should your "friend" never, ever play this game, you should quit too.
Considering I'm pretty sure this is one of those "So, um, my "friend" got a girl pregnant...." questions. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Felicity Love
Whore and Peace
1658
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
Nope.
CCP has changed it's Character Generation system at least a half dozen times over the years, offered the ability to accelerate training with specific implants for new pilots and even streamlined the skills requirements through various iterations of "rebalancing".
All too often, however, the moans and groans from the unwashed masses are rooted in impatience.
Folks like that will always find a game that allows them INSTANT GRATIFICATION with all kinds of "golden bullets", cheat codes and "God Modes"... so they should start heading for the "EXIT" sign now instead of suggesting and, in some cases, INSISTING that EVE isn't fair and needs to change.
Which is to say, Bullshit.

... and I was just saying the other day, "Damn, I miss Soundwave"....
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5094
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:21:00 -
[57] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
What's the point, really?
No one would not do it. The separation between newb and vet would stay the same and people would continue crying anyway. Total waste of Dev resources, in my opinion.
While I'd still disagree with it, making an argument for accelerated training for new players would have some merit at least.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Boomtown Jones
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:22:00 -
[58] - Quote
Despite all the vitriol in this thread, as others have pointed out it is quite possible to buy SP right now via plex and the character bazaar. P2W by anyone's standards.
I'm not saying that SP boosting for cash should be a thing, but I am saying that unless the character bazaar is removed there is little justification for its continued exclusion. All SP really does is open up options for gameplay anyway. It only serves as a measure of a players skill because it tells you how long they have been playing, and there are other ways to find that out. |

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1548
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:41:00 -
[59] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote: Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
NO.
EVE is not "instant gratification". EVE is not a game where everyone's playing field is level. Life is not fair, EVE is not fair.
HTFU. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Chinwe Rhei
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
81
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:47:00 -
[60] - Quote
As much as some people like to stroke themselves about some kind of supposed EvE ideological purity the reality is that ofcourse you can buy PLEX for real money and you can buy anything ingame for PLEX, including multiple accounts, pre-trained characters, all the ships you could ever want, etc...
Few games offer as much possibility of influencing gameplay with your wallet as EvE does.
|
|

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
539
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:54:00 -
[61] - Quote
As aid above many times, tell your friends to go buy a skilled up character and plex some ships.
With enough real cash you can be logging a character that can fly caps and supers with a hanger full of blinged up ships in less than a week.
NOTE: Despite many people thinking EVE is actually a game called "my SP is bigger than yours" it is the real life players knowledge of the game as a whole and personal contacts they have built up with other players that actually lead to "win" not total SP accumulated. |

Invisusira
The Rising Stars The Initiative.
255
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 22:59:00 -
[62] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Becoming GOOD at eve takes time, but that is also relative. If you play every day for 10 hours you WILL get better... only to be hindered by the arbitrary number that is 'Skill points'. Being good at EVE, much like most any other thing, takes practice. Period.
No game should be "pay to win." It is lazy, unbalanced, terrible design. Core Skills | EVE Music |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17701
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:05:00 -
[63] - Quote
Chinwe Rhei wrote:As much as some people like to stroke themselves about some kind of supposed EvE ideological purity the reality is that ofcourse you can buy PLEX for real money and you can buy anything ingame for PLEX, including multiple accounts, pre-trained characters, all the ships you could ever want, etc...
Few games offer as much possibility of influencing gameplay with your wallet as EvE does.
Nobody is denying that you can pile money into Eve to purchase a pretrained character or ships, it's just that doing so normally ends up in hilarious and ignominious explosions, in short it rarely ends well for the purchaser.
|

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
1062
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:06:00 -
[64] - Quote
For a new player, in my view the idea of "pay to win" in EvE is a fantasy.
It doesn't exist and the opposite is more likely to be true.
"Pay to lose" is what most new players would face if they could access more bling faster.
It takes time to develop the skills to use larger ships, to fit them properly, to have a network of in game friends to fly with and to be able to generate the ISK in game to afford them.
Without the player knowledge and experience, as with many things, a "pay to win" approach would mostly benefit the veterans who would be looting more shitfit blinged ships and taking home the spoils.
New players in bigger ships would stand no better chance of survival (possibly worse) and would just lose more ISK at a faster rate. . -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5096
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:12:00 -
[65] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Chinwe Rhei wrote:As much as some people like to stroke themselves about some kind of supposed EvE ideological purity the reality is that ofcourse you can buy PLEX for real money and you can buy anything ingame for PLEX, including multiple accounts, pre-trained characters, all the ships you could ever want, etc...
Few games offer as much possibility of influencing gameplay with your wallet as EvE does.
Nobody is denying that you can pile money into Eve to purchase a pretrained character or ships, it's just that doing so normally ends up in hilarious and ignominious explosions, in short it rarely ends well for the purchaser. By the same token, you can pour money into it for characters and ships knowing full well how to play the game. That normally doesn't end up in any hilarity for anyone. It's not pay-to-win, but it's a good way to pay to jump the queue.
If you pay attention in the Character Bazaar, I think you'll find there is an equal or larger percentage of experienced players buying them than new players.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17701
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:15:00 -
[66] - Quote
Good point Mr Epeen, an experienced player can indeed go that route.
|

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1548
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:20:00 -
[67] - Quote
Chinwe Rhei wrote:As much as some people like to stroke themselves about some kind of supposed EvE ideological purity the reality is that ofcourse you can buy PLEX for real money and you can buy anything ingame for PLEX, including multiple accounts, pre-trained characters, all the ships you could ever want, etc...
Few games offer as much possibility of influencing gameplay with your wallet as EvE does.
That's not "pay to win", by any, means. We see it multiple times a day on Battleclinic. Blinged-out ship dies in highsec mission... billions of ISK lost because the pilot had more money than brains. Or how about the character-under-new-management? You can easily tell an '03 toon that was sold on EBay, just from their lossmails.
Arguing that there is anything "pay to win" about EVE is just nonsense. SP only gets you so far. When we start seeing microtransations that give you 24 hours of double hit points, boost your damage by 4x, increase all your resistances by 30%, etc, THEN you can call EVE "pay to win". Until then, you're just talking out your poophole. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
2140
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
@OP
Sadly your thoughts on the matter are mostly incorrect.
First, EVE is one of the few MMO's I've ever played where long time vets and new players can effectively play together. Sure not with the same choice of ships but they can effectively complement each other.
Second, EVE is the kind of game that teaches you to "enjoy the now" If you are the type that always looks at what you can't use yet you will be unhappy for your entire EVE career. This is the mentality to impart on your new friends.
Luckily with all of the recent rebalancing, there has been a HUGE resurgence of PVP occurring with the use of T1 frigates and cruisers. Both of which are easily accessible to new players both in terms of skills and isk.
In short no, there isn't a real problem with SP in EVE and the way that it works. A perception problem maybe but not a real one. |

Doireen Kaundur
548
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Should eve be more 'Pay to Win?'
NO  A great American humorist and author recently said: "The one unintentional flaw of the internet generation is its ability to give the stupidest segments of our population the loudest voices." I have a tendency to agree with his statement.-á |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
539
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:45:00 -
[70] - Quote
The other issue is if the pay to win scenario was setup like everything else most vets would just plex the accelerator immediately becasue a PLEX for an older character is pocket money.
The real issue is the obsession new players have for T3s, battleships, supers and caps. Battleships have very limited usefulness in game (I only ever fly one with my highsec mission alt, in other words rarely). Supers are even more limited, and no sane person aspires to fly a Titan with their main, you will be logging in to stare at empty space for weeks on end.
I suppose you can just sell levels for cash. Say $10 per level per rank. That would cost $10 for level 1 of a rank 1 skill and $250 for level 5 of a rank 5 skill. But seriously what is the point when you can achieve the same result buying a character on the bazaar. |
|

leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:52:00 -
[71] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
Without going into too much detail, it seems like it might be worth seriously considering. Becoming GOOD at eve takes time, but that is also relative. If you play every day for 10 hours you WILL get better... only to be hindered by the arbitrary number that is 'Skill points'.
I've been playing since 2006'ish and I want to see a new influx of players or a way for newer players to accelerate themselfs to keep interest in the game. I've spent years training skills and it doesn't feel like an accomplishment. All i had to do was auto renew a subscription. What i've DONE in Eve feels like an accomplishment.
Perhaps offering 1 months subscription cost for 1 months worth of skillpoints (based on char stats) into your unassigned pool would be a possible way to ensure that old players got the same number of SP for every penny/cent they spent as a new player does. None of this makes new players better at the game or more financially sound... just gives them access to more ships/bonuses/market-opportunities. terrible idea minus 1 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20497
|
Posted - 2014.04.06 23:57:00 -
[72] - Quote
Chinwe Rhei wrote:As much as some people like to stroke themselves about some kind of supposed EvE ideological purity the reality is that ofcourse you can buy PLEX for real money and you can buy anything ingame for PLEX, including multiple accounts, pre-trained characters, all the ships you could ever want, etc...
Few games offer as much possibility of influencing gameplay with your wallet as EvE does.
GǪand the beauty of how that is being handled in EVE is that it never actually veers into P2W territory: at no point are any mechanics skipped over, obsoleted, ignored, or set aside. What you're paying for isn't any kind of GÇ£winGÇ¥ GÇö it's assets already in the game generated through in-game means in the time it takes to go through that generation. It's as much GÇ£pay to winGÇ¥ as paying your subscription, because that's all it actually amounts to (albeit with a slightly desynchronised order of events).
If other players are not willing to give you what you want, you will not get it no matter how much you pay. If anything even remotely resembling a GÇ£winGÇ¥ was available in the game, you could bet your ass that people wouldn't be selling much of it.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Tavin Aikisen
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
251
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:06:00 -
[73] - Quote
NO GAME should EVER be pay to win!
You pay for additional content via a subscription, store or a combination of both.
But there should never be advantages. You're paying to extend and expand your game. Remember this. Trust your eyes, you will kill each other. Trust your veins, you can all go home. -Cold Wind |

Rykuss
In Praise Of Bacchus
88
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 00:55:00 -
[74] - Quote
Every time I pay my subscription, which allows me to play internet spaceships, I win. Can I have your vindicator? |

Maeltstome
Twisted Insanity. The Kadeshi
431
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 01:16:00 -
[75] - Quote
Rykuss wrote:Every time I pay my subscription, which allows me to play internet spaceships, I win.
I liek dis :) |

Kronenbourg Strasbourg
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 01:45:00 -
[76] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:J'Poll wrote:Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through). 1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment 2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!" 3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser. Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right  Just here to confirm that this new player is indeed right. And rapidly proving that he not too stupid to play Eve, despite his initial impression 
Lol, thanks... I think  |

Kronenbourg Strasbourg
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 01:54:00 -
[77] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:J'Poll wrote:Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:I'm a very new player (approx. 6 weeks) and cannot see the point of being able to just jump through all of the initial stuff (which I am of course, currently going through). 1) If you're serious about a game like EVE, you'll actually enjoy the learning and discovery phase, whilst flying the more basic ships / using basic equipment 2) Even if someone handed me infinite ISK / skills / ships, I wouldn't really have a clue what to do with them / it, and would most likely get bashed by anyone with more experience, which personally i believe would lead to even more frustration and confusion than a new player currently experiences, therefore leading to more quitting... "Hey I've paid my way to getting all this stuff, why am I not suddenly really epic at the game??!?! THIS SUCKS, I QUIT!!" 3) Like anything in life, you don't get full appreciation or enjoyment from it, unless you have put in the necessary effort to then reap the rewards I don't care what game it is - Tetris, Sonic, Goldeneye, Sims, WoW, or EVE, you CANNOT run before you can walk, and cannot buy/cheat your way to being good at it. As I've read A LOT since being a member, the most valuable asset in EVE is not skills, equipment, or even ISK... It is the commodity of time. Without a lot of that invested, you're going to be the loser. Just my two pennies worth, but I think I'm right  Just here to confirm that this new player is indeed right. And rapidly proving that he not too stupid to play Eve, despite his initial impression  More to the point, people are getting a little derailed: I'm highlighting that right clicking an object, choosing "train skill" and then waiting and fixed amount of time is unrewarding game-play. Taking part in a variety of activities without fear of 'loosing time' however seems to make more sense.
That insinuates that someone adds a skill to the training queue and then does nothing until the training is complete? Surely EVE is the classic multi-tasking and multi-learning game?? i.e. while you're waiting for one thing, you do / learn another?
It seems as though the arguments put forwards are summarising a desire to reach some kind of 'end goal' as quickly as possible? I'm sure that even the most senior of players here will tell you that this is a game where you never stop learning, training and finding out new things. Maybe stick to a game where you get through a level, then kill the boss, then complete the game. I'm not sure those 'wins' are possible here  |

Space Juden
Supermassive Potato Pancake
71
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 01:59:00 -
[78] - Quote
If they made EVE F2P they could technically do this as the P2W people would be countered by tons of F2P nooobiez for veterans to beat up on. So everyone would be happy... Except the people who haven't paid
|

Asia Leigh
Beyond New Frontier
104
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:08:00 -
[79] - Quote
meh.. New people trying to Pay to win is usually a very expensive and hilarious loss mail in the making. When it happens I can only hope I'm on the kill mail :p Erotica 1: Scams someone-á-á Ripard: Makes inflamatory blog post that incites eve community and the MMO community-á Sohkar: I wasn't harrased-á-á-á-áCCP: Banned-á-á-á Moral of this story? If you don't want to get banned, don't **** off CSM |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
539
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:14:00 -
[80] - Quote
I am tempted to interpret the OP as asking for "Pay to accelerate skill progression to the point I can PLEX instead of subbing and then never pay again". :D |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20498
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:29:00 -
[81] - Quote
Kronenbourg Strasbourg wrote:Maeltstome wrote:More to the point, people are getting a little derailed: I'm highlighting that right clicking an object, choosing "train skill" and then waiting and fixed amount of time is unrewarding game-play. Taking part in a variety of activities without fear of 'loosing time' however seems to make more sense. That insinuates that someone adds a skill to the training queue and then does nothing until the training is complete? Surely EVE is the classic multi-tasking and multi-learning game?? i.e. while you're waiting for one thing, you do / learn another? It seems as though the arguments put forwards are summarising a desire to reach some kind of 'end goal' as quickly as possible? That's the core problem here, I suspect. The OP assumes that EVE is one of those GÇ£progress through content consumptionGÇ¥ games, and wish to skip some of that consumption. The one that doesn't exist.
Training skills is not unrewarding gameplay. In fact, it is not gameplay at all. That's what makes it such a vastly superior system: because it completely detaches the drudgery of character progression from the game you play. As a result, you can concentrate on actually playing the game rather than bash your head repeatedly against the GÇ£make level go upGÇ¥ button.
His idea might very well have had a place in a game where that kind of grind exists; where you want to get the building stuff over with faster so you can get to the game part of the game. The problem is, of course, that there is no such obstacle in EVE. You get to the game part of the game immediately here, and the fact that progression character building is just a rclick menu is exactly what makes it all possible. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1044
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:31:00 -
[82] - Quote
Trying to make EvE into another generic P2W MMO?
GTFO.
Stop trying to ruin our game. |

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar E.A.R.T.H. Federation
381
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:32:00 -
[83] - Quote
I've always been of the opinion that the skill system shouldn't be a gate to content, but rather simply be a means to improve upon it.
Tiericide went a long way to doing that, and I'm not sure any more is really even necessary.
|

Webvan
State Protectorate Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:36:00 -
[84] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships. Wut? I have around 7m SP on this char (1 of 2 combat pilots), friggen blast to play. Properly fit frig T2 loadouts where applicable. Thinking about dropping in another month of training for a maticore, luv the ship with my other pilot. You're friend? should stick to WoW perhaps. That's it right? or some other clone of it. He want's quick level cap, be at the pinnacle of pwnrship. Doesn't exist here... so he is lost in trying to play this game as he would WoW. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3949
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:42:00 -
[85] - Quote
Webvan wrote:Maeltstome wrote:The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships. Wut? I have around 7m SP on this char (1 of 2 combat pilots), friggen blast to play. Properly fit frig T2 loadouts where applicable. Thinking about dropping in another month of training for a maticore, luv the ship with my other pilot. You're friend? should stick to WoW perhaps. That's it right? or some other clone of it. He want's quick level cap, be at the pinnacle of pwnrship. Doesn't exist here... so he is lost in trying to play this game as he would WoW.
The English would love their grammar back.
You're where it should be your Want's where it is clearly wants
Just to name 2 major errors. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Webvan
State Protectorate Caldari State
364
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 02:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Webvan wrote:Maeltstome wrote:The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships. Wut? I have around 7m SP on this char (1 of 2 combat pilots), friggen blast to play. Properly fit frig T2 loadouts where applicable. Thinking about dropping in another month of training for a maticore, luv the ship with my other pilot. You're friend? should stick to WoW perhaps. That's it right? or some other clone of it. He want's quick level cap, be at the pinnacle of pwnrship. Doesn't exist here... so he is lost in trying to play this game as he would WoW. The English would love their grammar back. You're where it should be your Want's where it is clearly wants Just to name 2 major errors. Yes I was speeding, officer. Just give me the ticket. 
|

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
562
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 03:44:00 -
[87] - Quote
One of the reasons I stay with this game is because its not pay to win or grind to win.
I do not agree with it but if you want pay to win go buy a pilot or use ISboxxer and run 10 accounts and call it solo pvp.
I like this game because you HAVE to put in the time. It keeps the instant gratification kids out. You cant grind 23/7 and get ahead of the other guy just get more isk.
So no. Once this game becomes any more pay to win than it already is I will be moving on.
Yes...... when that day comes you can have my stuff. |

Divine Entervention
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
260
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 04:06:00 -
[88] - Quote
Life is pay to win.
EvE might as well be too. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 11:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
As bafoon as that last paragraph in the OP sounds, I have a worried feeling CCP will not be shooting such proposal down. Reminds me of how Planetside 2 handles its access to competitive gear. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3950
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 11:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
Jallukola wrote:As bafoon as that last paragraph in the OP sounds, I have a worried feeling CCP will not be shooting such proposal down. Reminds me of how Planetside 2 handles its access to competitive gear.
I think they learned their lesson with the last time they thought about microtransactions of non-vanity items...
Greed is good, right??? Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |
|

Dragon Outlaw
Rogue Fleet
184
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 11:48:00 -
[91] - Quote
Pay to win...or sacrifice your RL to win? That is the question. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15016
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 11:49:00 -
[92] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
Without going into too much detail, it seems like it might be worth seriously considering. Becoming GOOD at eve takes time, but that is also relative. If you play every day for 10 hours you WILL get better... only to be hindered by the arbitrary number that is 'Skill points'.
I've been playing since 2006'ish and I want to see a new influx of players or a way for newer players to accelerate themselfs to keep interest in the game. I've spent years training skills and it doesn't feel like an accomplishment. All i had to do was auto renew a subscription. What i've DONE in Eve feels like an accomplishment.
Perhaps offering 1 months subscription cost for 1 months worth of skillpoints (based on char stats) into your unassigned pool would be a possible way to ensure that old players got the same number of SP for every penny/cent they spent as a new player does. None of this makes new players better at the game or more financially sound... just gives them access to more ships/bonuses/market-opportunities.
Buy PLEX, sell for ISK, Buy character, equip with fancy ships. All legit and completely supported. And cheaper than ever!
Now He's paid, surely he will win.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3155
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 11:55:00 -
[93] - Quote
What is this "win" that people keep referencing? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

King Rothgar
Aegis Interplanetary .Inc Sanguis Ignis Prosperitum
396
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:00:00 -
[94] - Quote
I've thought about this issue too some. This toon has over 110M SP and I'm the guy who made it. I'm in a young alliance full of <1 year old toons however. Things I take for granted like t2 EANM's are actually kind of a big deal to many of them. It's 8-10d of training. Sure, it's a drop in the bucket overall. But when you consider that's for a single module and there are literally dozens of such mandatory items to be at all competitive regardless of what you use, it adds up fast.
I do not believe it should be possible to accelerate training times via plex or subscription, this would be very bad for the game as a whole. However I do think new players should get some sort of initial boost to allow smart new players to reach a basic level more or less instantly instead of spending 2 months just training up basic fitting skills.
There are a few possible non-p2w solutions. One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. That would largely eliminate the issue. I consider this the ideal option as it allows a new player to instantly have a decent frigate or destroyer of their choice. This isn't particularly drastic either. When I started playing back in 2007, my toon was created with around 800k SP if memory serves. I think I had all the prerequisites for t2 small projectiles straight off the character creation screen. And the average SP back then was a lot lower than it is today.
Another option that has also been tried is accelerated skill training for your first 1.5M-2M SP. This was done a couple years back as well. I honestly don't know why CCP decided to brutalize new players by starting them at effectively 0 SP in the current incarnation. Fireworks and snowballs are great, but what I really want is a corpse launcher. |

Sarah McKnobbo
McKnobbo Universal Traders
146
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:02:00 -
[95] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
1) Buy PLEX 2) Convert to ISK 3) Buy character 4)???? 5) Profit! (Wel, die in a ball of expensive fire due to lack of experience but, you get the idea) |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15017
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:02:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:What is this "win" that people keep referencing?
It never seems to be clearly defined. Apparently paying $3500 for a ship that spends 99% of its logged in time providing bridges for other people to actually go and have fun is "winning" v0v
1 Kings 12:11
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15017
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:03:00 -
[97] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:I've thought about this issue too some. This toon has over 110M SP and I'm the guy who made it. I'm in a young alliance full of <1 year old toons however. Things I take for granted like t2 EANM's are actually kind of a big deal to many of them. It's 8-10d of training. Sure, it's a drop in the bucket overall. But when you consider that's for a single module and there are literally dozens of such mandatory items to be at all competitive regardless of what you use, it adds up fast.
I do not believe it should be possible to accelerate training times via plex or subscription, this would be very bad for the game as a whole. However I do think new players should get some sort of initial boost to allow smart new players to reach a basic level more or less instantly instead of spending 2 months just training up basic fitting skills.
There are a few possible non-p2w solutions. One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. That would largely eliminate the issue. I consider this the ideal option as it allows a new player to instantly have a decent frigate or destroyer of their choice. This isn't particularly drastic either. When I started playing back in 2007, my toon was created with around 800k SP if memory serves. I think I had all the prerequisites for t2 small projectiles straight off the character creation screen. And the average SP back then was a lot lower than it is today.
Another option that has also been tried is accelerated skill training for your first 1.5M-2M SP. This was done a couple years back as well. I honestly don't know why CCP decided to brutalize new players by starting them at effectively 0 SP in the current incarnation.
The ganking community thanks you for your support.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Seven Koskanaiken
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
1153
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:07:00 -
[98] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Xylem Viliana wrote:Errr pay to win in eve...
Buy plex Sell plex for isk buy character on bazaar
Is this not basically p2w? Naah, it's Pay 2 Expensive loss with foolish fit.
Trickle Down Economics in action. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3160
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:10:00 -
[99] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit.
Good idea
Make sure they use it to train Tactical Shield Manipulation 5
I hear thats really cool *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Sarah McKnobbo
McKnobbo Universal Traders
147
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:12:00 -
[100] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:King Rothgar wrote:One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. Good idea Make sure they use it to train Tactical Shield Manipulation 5 I hear thats really cool
This, most people will just dump it into useless skills without knowing what's what and be in the same situation as they are now.
That and the ganking alt dream of insta-gank alts as Malcanis said. |
|

King Rothgar
Aegis Interplanetary .Inc Sanguis Ignis Prosperitum
396
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:12:00 -
[101] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:King Rothgar wrote:I've thought about this issue too some. This toon has over 110M SP and I'm the guy who made it. I'm in a young alliance full of <1 year old toons however. Things I take for granted like t2 EANM's are actually kind of a big deal to many of them. It's 8-10d of training. Sure, it's a drop in the bucket overall. But when you consider that's for a single module and there are literally dozens of such mandatory items to be at all competitive regardless of what you use, it adds up fast.
I do not believe it should be possible to accelerate training times via plex or subscription, this would be very bad for the game as a whole. However I do think new players should get some sort of initial boost to allow smart new players to reach a basic level more or less instantly instead of spending 2 months just training up basic fitting skills.
There are a few possible non-p2w solutions. One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. That would largely eliminate the issue. I consider this the ideal option as it allows a new player to instantly have a decent frigate or destroyer of their choice. This isn't particularly drastic either. When I started playing back in 2007, my toon was created with around 800k SP if memory serves. I think I had all the prerequisites for t2 small projectiles straight off the character creation screen. And the average SP back then was a lot lower than it is today.
Another option that has also been tried is accelerated skill training for your first 1.5M-2M SP. This was done a couple years back as well. I honestly don't know why CCP decided to brutalize new players by starting them at effectively 0 SP in the current incarnation. The ganking community thanks you for your support.
Rolling new toons constantly to avoid sec penalties is a bannable offense. So no, they really don't assuming CCP bothers to keep track of such things. It could also be applied to only the first toon on a new account. For further security, it could even be attached to the first payment on the account rather than being given out with the trial. Besides, who goes to the trouble of rolling a new toon just to gank some freighter? Do that **** as an outlaw with a kill rights list a km long. Neutral POS/orca stuffed full of catalysts ftw. Fireworks and snowballs are great, but what I really want is a corpse launcher. |

Tyramern
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:14:00 -
[102] - Quote
Attracting lots of people that are looking for instant gratification... great idea. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:17:00 -
[103] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:Malcanis wrote:King Rothgar wrote:I've thought about this issue too some. This toon has over 110M SP and I'm the guy who made it. I'm in a young alliance full of <1 year old toons however. Things I take for granted like t2 EANM's are actually kind of a big deal to many of them. It's 8-10d of training. Sure, it's a drop in the bucket overall. But when you consider that's for a single module and there are literally dozens of such mandatory items to be at all competitive regardless of what you use, it adds up fast.
I do not believe it should be possible to accelerate training times via plex or subscription, this would be very bad for the game as a whole. However I do think new players should get some sort of initial boost to allow smart new players to reach a basic level more or less instantly instead of spending 2 months just training up basic fitting skills.
There are a few possible non-p2w solutions. One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. That would largely eliminate the issue. I consider this the ideal option as it allows a new player to instantly have a decent frigate or destroyer of their choice. This isn't particularly drastic either. When I started playing back in 2007, my toon was created with around 800k SP if memory serves. I think I had all the prerequisites for t2 small projectiles straight off the character creation screen. And the average SP back then was a lot lower than it is today.
Another option that has also been tried is accelerated skill training for your first 1.5M-2M SP. This was done a couple years back as well. I honestly don't know why CCP decided to brutalize new players by starting them at effectively 0 SP in the current incarnation. The ganking community thanks you for your support. Rolling new toons constantly to avoid sec penalties is a bannable offense. So no, they really don't assuming CCP bothers to keep track of such things. It could also be applied to only the first toon on a new account. For further security, it could even be attached to the first payment on the account rather than being given out with the trial. Besides, who goes to the trouble of rolling a new toon just to gank some freighter? Do that **** as an outlaw with a kill rights list a km long. Neutral POS/orca stuffed full of catalysts ftw.
Sec penalties hehehe
1 Kings 12:11
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3160
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:19:00 -
[104] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote: who goes to the trouble of rolling a new toon just to gank some freighter? Do that **** as an outlaw with a kill rights list a km long.
http://c2.plzcdn.com/ZillaIMG/613079f00906e99e10f55354f25658a2.jpg *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Seven Koskanaiken
The Shadow Plague Fidelas Constans
1153
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 12:48:00 -
[105] - Quote
King Rothgar wrote:I've thought about this issue too some. This toon has over 110M SP and I'm the guy who made it. I'm in a young alliance full of <1 year old toons however. Things I take for granted like t2 EANM's are actually kind of a big deal to many of them. It's 8-10d of training. Sure, it's a drop in the bucket overall. But when you consider that's for a single module and there are literally dozens of such mandatory items to be at all competitive regardless of what you use, it adds up fast.
I do not believe it should be possible to accelerate training times via plex or subscription, this would be very bad for the game as a whole. However I do think new players should get some sort of initial boost to allow smart new players to reach a basic level more or less instantly instead of spending 2 months just training up basic fitting skills.
There are a few possible non-p2w solutions. One of the most obvious is to simply give new characters 2-3M free SP to spend as they see fit. That would largely eliminate the issue. I consider this the ideal option as it allows a new player to instantly have a decent frigate or destroyer of their choice. This isn't particularly drastic either. When I started playing back in 2007, my toon was created with around 800k SP if memory serves. I think I had all the prerequisites for t2 small projectiles straight off the character creation screen. And the average SP back then was a lot lower than it is today.
Another option that has also been tried is accelerated skill training for your first 1.5M-2M SP. This was done a couple years back as well. I honestly don't know why CCP decided to brutalize new players by starting them at effectively 0 SP in the current incarnation.
Well another solution is for leaders and FCs of newb alliances to make fits suitable for newbs and not change those fits up every 2-3 weeks.
The worst was that lowslot per module that needs Energy Grid Upgrades V, that for some reason FCs like fitting on their doctrine. Took me about 3 years to get around to training that ****.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5732
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 13:19:00 -
[106] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
The problem is your 'friend' and his lack of patience/determination, not anything wrong with the game.
What you should be doing is saying to your 'friend' "hey buddy, instead of subbing for a month or 2, leaving, coming back and then complaining about how things take to long, maybe you should either understand that EVE isn't for you because you're too impatient, or sub long enough to accomplish your goals".
Your post amounts to "instant gratification kiddies will give CCP money if you gratify them...instantly". It's the wrong way to go, EVE does and should demand patience and perseverance otherwise it's just another crappy mmo.
|

Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
203
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 13:34:00 -
[107] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
They already can.
Step #1: Create Account.
Step #2: Invest $XXXX in PLEX, however many you need for the following steps.
Step #3: Sell PLEX, currently running at ~$690 mil isk per PLEX.
Step #4: Use newfound billions in isk to purchase a pre-skilled character off the Character Bazzar.
And there you have it.
Direct injection of cash -> isk, then isk -> highly skilled/advanced character.
$10 Billion in isk will buy you a decent character, and will cost (from nothing) a meager $246.00 or so in PLEX investment.
Problem solved. |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 13:49:00 -
[108] - Quote
I see no issues with this... I mean we do already have the character bazaar so why not allow people to pay to boost their own created characters?
I would add the following terms though -They are done as sp boosts and not flat amounts of sp. Something along the lines of 2x or 3x sp for 30 days -They are cash only purchases to prevent plex prices from going through the roof |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20507
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 13:59:00 -
[109] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:I see no issues with this... I mean we do already have the character bazaar so why not allow people to pay to boost their own created characters? Because unlike the character bazaar, it bypasses the mechanics that ensure that you can't get skills faster by paying for it compared to not paying for it. Also, unlike the character bazaar, it completely wrecks the character ecology. Also, unlike the character bazaar, it benefits existing characters (i.e. old players) far more than it does new characters.
If you want to train faster, then just ask CCP to make training faster. Don't invent this idiotic pay-to-skip-mechanics scheme that does horrible things to the game and mechanics balance.
Because that's really what these ideas boil down to: the notion that GÇ£I don't want to be subject to the same mechanics everyone else is subject to GÇö please let me pay to not play the same game as everyone else.GÇ¥ The very notion that drives the idea is also the very reason why it's an obviously hideously stupid idea. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3953
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:02:00 -
[110] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:I see no issues with this... I mean we do already have the character bazaar so why not allow people to pay to boost their own created characters?
I would add the following terms though -They are done as sp boosts and not flat amounts of sp. Something along the lines of 2x or 3x sp for 30 days -They are cash only purchases to prevent plex prices from going through the roof
Edit: better yet allow 2x or 3x boosts to be purchased as sellable licenses for $5 more the same as plex.
Read up about Cerebral Accelerators. Find out that its already there. Find out that your post is thus redundant and stupid.
Your edit is as stupid as the OP. It's the same thing minus the money to PLEX conersion and thus is Pay2Win. If you want that go play any dime in a dozen MMOs out there. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |
|

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
27
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:23:00 -
[111] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:I see no issues with this... I mean we do already have the character bazaar so why not allow people to pay to boost their own created characters? Because unlike the character bazaar, it bypasses the mechanics that ensure that you can't get skills faster by paying for it compared to not paying for it. Also, unlike the character bazaar, it completely wrecks the character ecology. Also, unlike the character bazaar, it benefits existing characters (i.e. old players) far more than it does new characters. If you want to train faster, then just ask CCP to make training faster. Don't invent this idiotic pay-to-skip-mechanics scheme that does horrible things to the game and mechanics balance. Because that's really what these ideas boil down to: the notion that GÇ£I don't want to be subject to the same mechanics everyone else is subject to GÇö please let me pay to not play the same game as everyone else.GÇ¥ The very notion that drives the idea is also the very reason why it's an obviously hideously stupid idea.
Who cares if you can pay to earn skills faster? The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve i can't see this being an issue over character or plex sales for usd.
30 day 2x boost $15 30 day 3x boost $30
So if you want a 3x boost that's $45 a month to sub 1 account but essentially condenses 3 months worth of sp into 1 month. I hardly think having someone generate 4.5m sp instead of 1.5m in a month is going to be earth shattering for your precious ecology.
Who says it shouldn't benefit everyone new and old?
... Between plexs and character bazaar you can pretty much pay to skip any game mechanic you wish.
The big win is it's another revenue stream for ccp which allows them to keep the doors open and the updates coming. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3166
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:26:00 -
[112] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote: The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve
Again, please explain what you consider "winning" in EvE *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3954
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:28:00 -
[113] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Organic Lager wrote: The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve Again, please explain what you consider "winning" in EvE
Dont bother. Themepark players will always insist on pay to win or the ability to catch up.
They are too brainwashed to see that EVE doesn work like that no re that it needs to work like that. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20508
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:36:00 -
[114] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:Who cares if you can pay to earn skills faster? Yes who cares if mechanics don't apply to you? I mean, training time is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Warp scrambling is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Spawning ISK is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Taking damage is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else?
Quote:The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve GǪaside from the tiny problematic detail that there is no pay-to-win in EVE.
Quote:Who says it shouldn't benefit everyone new and old? It's not that it should or shouldn't GÇö it's that it can't and won't.
Quote:The big win is it's another revenue stream for ccp which allows them to GǪnot nearly make up for the lost income from people leaving in droves as the game is fundamentally ruined. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:37:00 -
[115] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Organic Lager wrote: The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve Again, please explain what you consider "winning" in EvE Dont bother. Themepark players will always insist on pay to win or the ability to catch up. They are too brainwashed to see that EVE doesn work like that no re that it needs to work like that.
Winning is what ever you make it to be in eve. Finally flying that new shiny ship, getting those sweet sweet killmails, owning your own piece of space, collecting billions of isk in day trading among thousands more.
This is proposed as a tool to help those who want it. If you are already winning eve your way then don't use it but i don't see why it matters if other choose to use and pay for it. It's not like it's a proposal for over night cap pilots.
If sp is so insignificant why do you all care so much about the thought of someone catching up to your 5+ year old character? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20508
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:42:00 -
[116] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:This is proposed as a tool to help those who want it. Ah, GÇ£you don't have to use it if you don't want toGÇ¥ GÇö the most feeble of excuses for game-breaking mechanics.
Tell me, who would not want to skip over mechanics that hold them back?
Quote:if sp is so insignificant why do you all care so much about the thought of someone catching up to your 5+ year old character? Mainly because it exposes the thorough ignorance in thinking that GÇ£catching upGÇ¥ is an applicable concept to EVE, and that it is this ignorance that drives the will to unbalance the game and break game mechanics for no useful reason whatsoever.
Again, if you want to train faster, ask CCP to make training faster. Don't ask them to let you play a different game than everyone else. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:45:00 -
[117] - Quote
I'd be ok with SP acceleration for money or even PLEX.
I wouldn't buy it, but doesn't bother me one bit if someone else would. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3170
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:45:00 -
[118] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:
Winning is what ever you make it to be in eve. Finally flying that new shiny ship, getting those sweet sweet killmails, owning your own piece of space, collecting billions of isk in day trading among thousands more.
This is proposed as a tool to help those who want it. If you are already winning eve your way then don't use it but i don't see why it matters if other choose to use and pay for it. It's not like it's a proposal for over night cap pilots.
If sp is so insignificant why do you all care so much about the thought of someone catching up to your 5+ year old character?
Because the game is as it is for a reason, without knowing what that reason is you may effect parts of the game you havent foreseen your suggestions changing.
But in a more direct answer, it will lead to more people making even more uncorrectable mistakes by buying even more useless skills without taking the time to figure out what they want and what they need.
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3956
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:46:00 -
[119] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:J'Poll wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Organic Lager wrote: The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve Again, please explain what you consider "winning" in EvE Dont bother. Themepark players will always insist on pay to win or the ability to catch up. They are too brainwashed to see that EVE doesn work like that no re that it needs to work like that. Winning is what ever you make it to be in eve. Finally flying that new shiny ship, getting those sweet sweet killmails, owning your own piece of space, collecting billions of isk in day trading among thousands more. This is proposed as a tool to help those who want it. If you are already winning eve your way then don't use it but i don't see why it matters if other choose to use and pay for it. It's not like it's a proposal for over night cap pilots. If sp is so insignificant why do you all care so much about the thought of someone catching up to your 5+ year old character?
So.
You want to turn EVE into an instant gratification thing like WoW and its clones.
Got it.
You arw forgetting that the vast majority of EVE players will leave if CCP does this. And its the players who made and make the game.
By your posts it shows just how little you know about the underlying mechanics etc and that your idea in any formnis game breaking bad that CCP might aswel pull the plug out of the servers. Thus any point made is just white noise on the forums... Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:47:00 -
[120] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:Who cares if you can pay to earn skills faster? Yes who cares if mechanics don't apply to you? I mean, training time is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Warp scrambling is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Spawning ISK is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Taking damage is just a mechanic GÇö you should be able to skip it, because why should it apply the same to you as everyone else? Quote:The pay to win is already very prevalent in eve GǪaside from the tiny problematic detail that there is no pay-to-win in EVE. Quote:Who says it shouldn't benefit everyone new and old? It's not that it should or shouldn't GÇö it's that it can't and won't. Quote:The big win is it's another revenue stream for ccp which allows them to GǪnot nearly make up for the lost income from people leaving in droves as the game is fundamentally ruined.
Do you argue for the sake of arguing or am i really missing something here?
You can skip training time via character bazaar? You can spawn isk via plex The other 2 don't apply to this debate about benefits from external cash.
You can already buy characters (sp) with the bazaar and isk via plex... That is as much pay-to-win as an sp boost to your character
What do you mean can't and wont? No more so then someone buying plex can't or won't
Anyone that butt hurt over the game being fundamentally ruined by pay-to-win would have already left when plex and character bazaar became a thing. |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:50:00 -
[121] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:Do you argue for the sake of arguing or am i really missing something here?
Yes, she does. And unintelligibly so, repeatedly. There is never any heads or tails to it.
No honesty or integrity either.
You are better off just flat out ignoring her posts. I do. ------------ |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
596
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:53:00 -
[122] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote: Do you argue for the sake of arguing or am i really missing something here?
You are in fact missing something here.
Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4872
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:55:00 -
[123] - Quote
Winning at EVE is when you successfully quit & never return, so sure, pay CCP a bunch of money to stop playing I guess. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2569
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 14:58:00 -
[124] - Quote
I think the OP has the wording a little wrong. The term is "It pays to win" when it comes to Eve. Ask the null sec cartel directors. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4872
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:00:00 -
[125] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ask the null sec cartel directors.
Still riding on that pony? This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
596
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:00:00 -
[126] - Quote
Are you stalking goons?! Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20510
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:00:00 -
[127] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:Do you argue for the sake of arguing or am i really missing something here? You're really missing something: you're asking for a method to skip game mechanics you don't like. That is exactly why what you're asking for is a very bad idea.
Quote:You can skip training time via character bazaar? You can spawn isk via plex Nope. The bazaar does not skip training time; PLEX does not spawn ISK. That is why they work. The problem here is that you don't understand how the game works and you think of GÇ£solutionsGÇ¥ to problems that don't exist, and in doing so create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined.
Quote:The other 2 don't apply to this debate about benefits from external cash. They all apply: they are all examples of why it's a very bad idea to let players arbitrarily skip game mechanics just because they pay for it.
Quote:What do you mean can't and wont? I mean can't and won't. New players will not have the cash, the investment, the familiarity with mechanics, the long-term vision, the attributes, or the experience to make good use of the faster training. All that will happen is that they make more mistakes faster. Meanwhile, older players who do have all that will use this to further the SP gap between them and new players; to spam new special-purpose alts; and to generally assure that they get every edge there is to get. You are creating the exact problem the solution is meant to solve because you're trying to fix a problem that the game has already solved for you.
New players are not in a position to benefit from this change; old players are. Even new players somehow were[/-¦] able to do so, all that would happen is that they maintain the status quo. So they can't and they won't benefit everyone GÇö only the old.
Again: if you want to train faster, ask CCP to make training faster. At least then, you know it [i]will benefit everyone and it won't skip any game mechanics in the process, which is a huge plus. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:04:00 -
[128] - Quote
Tippia wrote:create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined.
Such as? ------------ |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4872
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:05:00 -
[129] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Are you stalking goons?!
He's angry about a bunch of changes to highsec that have happened in the past 6 months & believes it's some nullsec-CCP conspiracy directly targetting him, so he's come up with a second conspiracy to make his first conspiracy kind of make sense to him & anyone stupid enough to take his word for it. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4876
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:06:00 -
[130] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined. Such as?
Perhaps you should begin with the learning of how things actually work first. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:15:00 -
[131] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined. Such as? Perhaps you should begin with the learning of how things actually work first.
Its a simple question for elaboration. What's wrong? Can't answer it?
I know how things work. I don't know what "vastly bigger problems" she is imagining. I'm not a mind-reader. Its normal to ask people to elaborate when they make such claims. ------------ |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
596
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:15:00 -
[132] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined. Such as? The ones she listed I'm the post you quoted Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:16:00 -
[133] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined. Such as? The ones she listed I'm the post you quoted
She didn't list any "vastly bigger problems" in the post I quoted.
Nor are you Tippia. Or are you? My question was addressed to her, specifically. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20510
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:16:00 -
[134] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Such as? Perhaps you should begin with the learning of how things actually work first. GǪalso how to read, since the problems are described in the post he quoted. 
Mallak Azaria wrote:He's angry about a bunch of changes to highsec that have happened in the past 6 months & believes it's some nullsec-CCP conspiracy directly targetting him, so he's come up with a second conspiracy to make his first conspiracy kind of make sense to him & anyone stupid enough to take his word for it. Oh, it's not just the past 6 months. It's everything that has happened since he started playing pretty much. If it benefits highsec, it's nullsec plot to destroy it; if it doesn't affect highsec, it's a nullsec plot to destroy it; on the exceedingly rare occasions that a minute part of highsec is negatively affected in some marginal way, it's proof positive that nullsec is definitely plotting to destroy highsec. Somehow.  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:17:00 -
[135] - Quote
So, what are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20513
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:17:00 -
[136] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:So, what are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? Learn to read. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3172
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:18:00 -
[137] - Quote
Now, trolling me, that I can understand. Im quick to anger and I take bait easily.
But to troll Tippia? That would be a hiding to nothing Id imagine. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:20:00 -
[138] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:So, what are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? Learn to read.
I can read that. It says "Learn to read".
It would seem its you who needs to learn to read, since you did not answer the question.
What are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to?
List them here. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20513
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:20:00 -
[139] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:What are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? Learn to read. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
596
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:24:00 -
[140] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:So, what are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? Learn to read. I can read that. It says "Learn to read". It would seem its you who needs to learn to read, since you did not answer the question. What are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? List them here. Why would anyone do this for you, it's a redundant question that doesn't need answering. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:26:00 -
[141] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:What are these "vastly bigger problems" you refer to? Learn to read.
Those are fail reasons, and not "problems" whatsoever.
You can still skill at the normal rate. Nothing stops you from doing so.
If someone uses RL money or a PLEX to skill faster, then they are expending an additional resource to do so.
No problem there.
Doesn't affect Bazaar prices either, because someone who wants to fast train a character will end up paying more for that, than someone who does so at a vanilla rate.
"Ecology"... lol.
I pity you, Tippia. Really, I do. Perhaps you are considered witty or smart in your small circles, but you wouldn't stand a second in the ones I frequent. Frankly, its embarrassing reading your dilettante attempts at constructing arguments, and then repeatedly falling back on Schopenhauer discursive tricks, not because its convenient, but because you genuinely don't know any better or are capable of an actual debate. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20513
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:28:00 -
[142] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Those are fail reasons, and not "problems" whatsoever. How so?
Quote:You can still skill at the normal rate. Nothing stops you from doing so. Again: GÇ£you don't have to use itGÇ¥ is the most feeble of excuses that always seep out whenever people try to justify wanting to break the mechanics. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:30:00 -
[143] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:Do you argue for the sake of arguing or am i really missing something here? You're really missing something: you're asking for a method to skip game mechanics you don't like. That is exactly why what you're asking for is a very bad idea. Quote:You can skip training time via character bazaar? You can spawn isk via plex Nope. The bazaar does not skip training time; PLEX does not spawn ISK. That is why they work. The problem here is that you don't understand how the game works and you think of GÇ£solutionsGÇ¥ to problems that don't exist, and in doing so create vastly bigger problems than the ones you imagined. Quote:The other 2 don't apply to this debate about benefits from external cash. They all apply: they are all examples of why it's a very bad idea to let players arbitrarily skip game mechanics just because they pay for it. Quote:What do you mean can't and wont? I mean can't and won't. New players will not have the cash, the investment, the familiarity with mechanics, the long-term vision, the attributes, or the experience to make good use of the faster training. All that will happen is that they make more mistakes faster. Meanwhile, older players who do have all that will use this to further the SP gap between them and new players; to spam new special-purpose alts; and to generally assure that they get every edge there is to get. You are creating the exact problem the solution is meant to solve because you're trying to fix a problem that the game has already solved for you. New players are not in a position to benefit from this change; old players are. Even new players somehow were able to do so, all that would happen is that they maintain the status quo. So they can't and they won't benefit everyone GÇö only the old. Again: if you want to train faster, ask CCP to make training faster. At least then, you know it will benefit everyone and it won't skip any game mechanics in the process, which is a huge plus.
Sorry i can't crop the post better due to being on an iphone.
If i don't want to earn isk and buy a plex to sell, have i not skipped the isk generation mechanic? If i spend isk to buy a character already loaded with sp, have i not skipped the sp generation mechanic? I get someone had to earn the sp and isk but i can still pay to skip it. If you are worried about devaluation of characters don't be because the cost of 1 month at 3x sp is the cost (or more) of 3 months at 1x sp, balance.
The other 2 don't apply because i'm not asking for a new mechanic. A 15 minute 80% damage reduction for $10 would fubar the game. Allowing a player to get to l5 skills that thousands already have changes nothing.
Once again with new and old players it's relative. I don't see how offering a way to speed up sp gives an advantage to one over the other? If a vet wants to pay and support a specialty alt why punish them with a 3 month training queue? If a new player will make a mistake 3 months down the road why not let them make it 1 month down the road instead?
I don't want faster sp, i am very happy with the pace and have no interest in paying with usd for what i'm proposing. I'm just saying if someone would like to pay to speed up sp let them and profit. The profits will benefit me. |

Bunnie Hop
529
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:32:00 -
[144] - Quote
I have quit every game I tried that had a pay to win mechanic. It is for lazy developers and even lazier players and completely takes away any sense of achievement from a game. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:33:00 -
[145] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Those are fail reasons, and not "problems" whatsoever. How so?
Please, are you joking?
You genuinely can't grasp that if someone expends RL money or PLEX for accelerated SP, then he is spending MORE than someone who is skilling conventionally?
It doesn't "break" any mechanic. Do you not even know what "mechanic" means, in terms of game design? Apparently you don't.
Makes no difference to you, or me, whatsoever, if some third guy spends an additional PLEX or dollars per month for some % of accelerated training. No difference AT ALL.
It makes no difference to anyone else in the game, what rate someone who spends money or PLEX on an accelerated rate, does.
If you don't want to buy it, then don't. You can continue skilling at the same rate you always have. If some people expend an additional PLEX per month for an accelerated rate, or additional currency in addition to gametime, so what?
Doesn't cause a problem in Bazaar either, because any character that is "grown" for sale through an accelerated SP rate, also incurs more costs in its production. So it will never be cheaper than a vanilla grown toon that takes longer.
This is really elementary stuff that anyone with a modicum of objective perspective and capacity to fathom a simple abstract model and its repercussions, can easily comprehend. ------------ |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5733
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:35:00 -
[146] - Quote
To answer the main question, no, EVE should not ever be pay to win nor is it like that now. PLEX and the character bazaar aren't pay to win, both are "pay for someone else to grind for you" but offer no advantage that anyone who isn't paying can't get.
Other than game time, the only things you should be able to get for real life money form EVE are monocles and ships skins and the like. The people telling y'all that this is a bad idea aren't anti-progress, they are anti "lets kill what makes EVE great".
Say no to pay to win. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
598
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:36:00 -
[147] - Quote
Salvos, why are you arguing this one?
Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5734
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:39:00 -
[148] - Quote
Bunnie Hop wrote:I have quit every game I tried that had a pay to win mechanic. It is for lazy developers and even lazier players and completely takes away any sense of achievement from a game.
Exactly, it destroys the value of the time you spend acquiring something.
The day i finished my 1st BS skill to 5 (which unlocked a lot of different game play possibilities like marauders and Black ops ect) was very memorable, yet some people want to diminish that in some weird bid to get people who aren't suited to playing EVE online in the 1st place to subscribe to the game. Or so they say, because honestly it smacks of "I'm tired of training and want it now' thinking for themselves.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3174
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:39:00 -
[149] - Quote
Because like PLEXing your account, the thing you are wanting to pay for does not appear out of nowhere
What I mean by this;
No one "plays for free" as the PLEX is payed for by someone
No one learns skills faster (with the exception of the extremely limited item) as the character on the bizairre (intentional) was trained at the same speed as everyone else.
If you are a lazyball and buy a character instead of training and learning, well thats your lookout, but SOMEONE trained that character, and went to the effort of doing it. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20514
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:42:00 -
[150] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:If i don't want to earn isk and buy a plex to sell, have i not skipped the isk generation mechanic? No. The ISK you're getting is generated in the normal way, by spending time collecting it through the regular in-game activities that accrue ISK. You are simply trading your (future) time against time they've spent in the past. PLEX don't create any ISK whatsoever.
Quote:If i spend isk to buy a character already loaded with sp, have i not skipped the sp generation mechanic? No. The SP you're getting has been generated in the normal way, by spending time and ISK putting skills into a queue and waiting for them to complete. If you want 6 years worth of SP, it took 6 years to create them. You are also only ever getting old decisions GÇö not new ones. You are trading ISK to be spent in the future against ISK and time that has been spent in the past. The bazaar does not create any SP whatsoever.
Quote:The other 2 don't apply because i'm not asking for a new mechanic. Yes you are. You're asking for a mechanic that skips other mechanics GÇö specifically the skill training and attribute mechanics GÇö and to be able to pay for the privilege of not having those mechanics apply to you the way they do to everyone else. The other two apply for the same reason: because they are examples of paying to not have mechanics apply to you the way they do to everyone else.
The reason you don't feel that they apply is because the game breaking nature is so readily apparent in them, but fundamentally, it's the exact same kind of game breakage that you're asking for, and what you're asking for is very bad for the exact same reasons why those ideas are bad.
Quote:Once again with new and old players it's relative. I don't see how offering a way to speed up sp gives an advantage to one over the other? Because one can take advantage of it and the other cannot. Be it because of lack of knowledge or funding or support structure, new players will only ever be able to GÇ£benefitGÇ¥ in the sense that they maintain the status quo, whereas old players GÇö who don't lack any of those GÇö will be able to push ahead in many new and interesting ways (that break the game).
Quote:I don't want faster sp, i am very happy with the pace and have no interest in paying with usd for what i'm proposing. I'm just saying if someone would like to pay to speed up sp let them and profit. The profits will benefit me. Ok, fine. Not you specifically then. The answer is still the same: if (generic) you want to train faster, ask CCP to make training faster; don't ask them to allow people to skip game mechanics for cash because that inherently breaks the game GÇö it is, after all, the whole point of the suggestion. And no, the GÇ£profitsGÇ¥ will not benefit you (unless you wish to explain how draining the game of players and forcing CCP to downsize and/or become an EA subsidiary benefits anyone). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5734
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:43:00 -
[151] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Because like PLEXing your account, the thing you are wanting to pay for does not appear out of nowhere
What I mean by this;
No one "plays for free" as the PLEX is payed for by someone
No one learns skills faster (with the exception of the extremely limited item) as the character on the bizairre (intentional) was trained at the same speed as everyone else.
If you are a lazyball and buy a character instead of training and learning, well thats your lookout, but SOMEONE trained that character, and went to the effort of doing it.
And that's the part that these guys are missing. They want to pay CCP for a direct result, which goes against everything the game is about.
PLEX and the char bazaar lets players pay OTHER PLAYERS for something they spent time to acquire, with CCP simply taking a cut of the action. What they want is a true short cut: to give ccp money to give them an in game advantage out of thin air. It's BS.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3174
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:45:00 -
[152] - Quote
Exactly, why even mine or buy ore from the market.
CCP, can I pay $5 for 80,000,000 tons of veldspar please. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:47:00 -
[153] - Quote
Consider the following example:
You can buy 1 month SP boost for 1 PLEX or some amount of currency between cost of PLEX and Gametime. Lets say the boost causes a 50% increase in stats.
This person is then paying 2 PLEX or 2 Gametimes per month, for that one character, to skill it 50% faster.
SO WHAT
How is that a problem for anyone else? We can continue skilling at the same rate, and at the same nominal cost, as we always have.
That some people would be doing this makes not one iota of difference to our game experience.
Furthermore, as to Bazaar, this guys toons will NEVER be more profitable than someone who grows their Bazaar toons conventionally. Why? Because he is expending 1 additional PLEX per month, to skill them, whereas someone who is not expending the PLEX, simply trains for longer, and sells the toon for a much greater profit, a month later.
It seriously makes no difference to anyone elses game experience, nor to the Bazaar. Anyone who wants to boost their toons, will have to expend double the amount in PLEX/currency that a conventional player does. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20514
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:48:00 -
[154] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:You genuinely can't grasp that if someone expends RL money or PLEX for accelerated SP, then he is spending MORE than someone who is skilling conventionally?
It doesn't "break" any mechanic. GǪaside from the skill training mechanics put into place to ensure a certain progression speed. After all, the whole point of the idea is to bypass exactly that mechanic. Also, you didn't answer the question: how are my reasons GǣfailGǥ or Gǣnot problemsGǥ? You have yet to actually address any of the problems I've described (quite possibly because you failed to read).
Also, you genuinely can't grasp that spending more cash is not a valid reason to not have mechanics apply to you? Are you also for being able to pay to skip ISK generation? To skip warp scrambling? To skip damage?
Quote:It makes no difference to anyone else in the game, what rate someone who spends money or PLEX on an accelerated rate, does. This is incorrect. There's this interesting concept that you need to read up on (once you learn how to) called GÇ£devaluationGÇ¥. There's another interesting concept that is often being used in relation to skipping universal game mechanics. It's called an GÇ£exploitGÇ¥ or a GÇ£cheatGÇ¥ GÇö when you eventually read up on those, you'll notice that they have very negative connotations, and you'll notice that the reason for this is very closely linked to how mechanics apply equally to all playersGǪ
Quote:This is really elementary stuff that anyone with a modicum of objective perspective and capacity to fathom a simple abstract model and its repercussions, can easily comprehend. Indeed it is, and that's why you're struggling to comprehend the significant problems it will create. That, and your inability to read. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
293
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:50:00 -
[155] - Quote
I really don't understand the gripe about new players not being able to catch old ones. It is a dumb argument.
I currently have 124m sp's, been here 10 years, prolly missed maybe 6 months of training, never used any implants, and for a while my attibutes were a bit.. mm, skewed.
In my 10 years I have made maybe 10 different accounts, currently I have three, at different times, and each time I could pretty much do what I wanted that account for in a about a week. Same with alts, I needed a holding corp alt, took me 2 days to get him where I wanted.
You don't need to play catch up, that's a logical fallacy and a poor mans excuse. I may have 124m sp's, a bucket load of skills, but if I go up again a 1 week old char, odds are I will lose. Why? I don't pvp. I have skills to pvp, but most of the time I dunnp what the heck I am doing, and 90% of the time I go pop.
Pretty much, this is like going into a trade as an apprentice, looking at the master craftsmen/women, and going "i'll never catch up with them, f this" Its just plain dumb to think this way.
Expeence, both in time spent, and amount played, should be a factor. Its not my fault you never found our little game till now. Nor is it my fault I have been addicted to this world for 10 years.
People who focus on the number of skill points they have, and that's all they focus on, have come to eve with the wrong mindset. One of the reason I have played this game as long as I have is the skill system. Its the most IRL based I have ever seen. You gain knowladges both by playing, and by "going to school". You can't just sit in the seat of a car and know exactly how to drive it. And just because you can drive a pinto doesn't mean you can drive for nascar. The point is, just because yu have a few skill points, doesn't make you worthless. If all you are focused on is your SP numbers, then maybe eve is not the game for you. Just like to guy who takes a job and worries about how little money they are making, instead of learning the job so they can do and make more later, is prolly not in the right job. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:50:00 -
[156] - Quote
It wouldn't make a bit of difference to anyone else.
It doesn't "break" any game mechanic.
It just means that players who have PLEX or currency at hand, can achieve their skill goals sooner. So what.
In order to do so, they have to use PLEX or purchase the boost with currency, both of which are good for the game overall. ------------ |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:51:00 -
[157] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:To answer the main question, no, EVE should not ever be pay to win nor is it like that now. PLEX and the character bazaar aren't pay to win, both are "pay for someone else to grind for you" but offer no advantage that anyone who isn't paying can't get.
Other than game time, the only things you should be able to get for real life money form EVE are monocles and ships skins and the like. The people telling y'all that this is a bad idea aren't anti-progress, they are anti "lets kill what makes EVE great".
Say no to pay to win.
I still don't get it... As a monthly paying customer where do i sign up for my free 700m from a plex sale? Oh wait no i have to PAY extra for that, how is that not the definition of pay-to-win?
Through the character bazaar isk = sp, therefore we already have a mechanism for paying to win with sp. Is it such a stretch to allow this on someones personal account instead of having to buy someone elses?
To the second paragraph true and very fair, if plex and character bazaar weren't a thing i can't see sp boosts being a thing either. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3177
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:54:00 -
[158] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:
I still don't get it... As a monthly paying customer where do i sign up for my free 700m from a plex sale? Oh wait no i have to PAY extra for that, how is that not the definition of pay-to-win?
Through the character bazaar isk = sp, therefore we already have a mechanism for paying to win with sp. Is it such a stretch to allow this on someones personal account instead of having to buy someone elses?
To the second paragraph true and very fair, if plex and character bazaar weren't a thing i can't see sp boosts being a thing either.
1) Isk does NOT = win
2) Because, as stated by myself and others, those SPs have not come from nowhere, they are generated at the same rate as all other SPs by players. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5736
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:54:00 -
[159] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Consider the following example:
You can buy 1 month SP boost for 1 PLEX or some amount of currency between cost of PLEX and Gametime. Lets say the boost causes a 50% increase in stats.
This person is then paying 2 PLEX or 2 Gametimes per month, for that one character, to skill it 50% faster.
SO WHAT
How is that a problem for anyone else? We can continue skilling at the same rate, and at the same nominal cost, as we always have.
That some people would be doing this makes not one iota of difference to our game experience.
Even if true, it's not the point. It doesn't matter if it doesn't affect us personally, it means that the nature of the game has changed and this is a bad thing. Many of us play it because it's player driven and has a consistent set of rules.
Quote: Furthermore, as to Bazaar, this guys toons will NEVER be more profitable than someone who grows their Bazaar toons conventionally. Why? Because he is expending 1 additional PLEX per month, to skill them, whereas someone who is not expending the PLEX, simply trains for longer, and sells the toon for a much greater profit, a month later.
It seriously makes no difference to anyone elses game experience, nor to the Bazaar. Anyone who wants to boost their toons, will have to expend double the amount in PLEX/currency that a conventional player does.
The mistake you are making is applying your own set of needs to the situation. in other words, "if it cost you money" or affected your gameplay in some kind of way, it would be 'bad' and if it doesn't it's 'good'.
That's a very narrow minded way to look at things. It's not about whether or not it negatively affects us (it wouldn't affect me at al), it's about the nature of the game we're playing. Dividing EVE into different 'shards' wouldn't affect me either as I'm a PVE player and any eve shard would have guristas/bloods/serps to kill, but it would still be a horrible and un-EVE-like thing to do.
If we wanted to play games that weren't EVE, we'd be playing them already.
|

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
295
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:57:00 -
[160] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:It wouldn't make a bit of difference to anyone else.
It doesn't "break" any game mechanic.
It just means that players who have PLEX or currency at hand, can achieve their skill goals sooner. So what. They are doing it by expending more resources in that time period, to do so. Overall, they will have spent atleast as much PLEX/money, and probably much more, than any conventional player. The only difference, is time.
In order to do so, they have to use PLEX or purchase the boost with currency, both of which are good for the game overall.
You already can, there are these nice things called implants. You can take the isk you would of used for a plex and buy a set of +5's. Then you will train WAY faster then i will, even though i have been here for 10 years, i die WAY too much for implants. So you already have a 'sp boost'
Why should you be rewarded for coming to a 10 year game now, when I have been here since the nearly the beginning? This would break game mechanics and you would see a ton of vets quit over this.
And if they open it up to everyone, then you would STILL never catch up. Because again, as a 10 year vet, i know pretty much this game backwards and farwards, and i can easily make more money then you, so i could always just keep getting plex and keep boosting. So you would STILL get no advantage, thus making this idea pointless. |
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3180
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:57:00 -
[161] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: If we wanted to play games that weren't EVE, we'd be playing them already.
The "CHANGE ALL THE THINGS" crowd need this branded onto their foreheads as a warning to others *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20514
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:58:00 -
[162] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:It wouldn't make a bit of difference to anyone else. It doesn't "break" any game mechanic. GǪaside from the skilling and attribute mechanics put into place to regulate how quickly you can accumulate SP GÇö mechanics that apply to everyone.
Quote:It just means that players who have PLEX or currency at hand, can achieve their skill goals sooner. So what. So paying to not have mechanics apply to you is inherently a bad idea.
Organic Lager wrote:I still don't get it... As a monthly paying customer where do i sign up for my free 700m from a plex sale? Oh wait no i have to PAY extra for that, how is that not the definition of pay-to-win? Because you're not buying any win. You're trading future game time for past game time (at a thoroughly atrocious rate). You are not skipping time GÇö nothing is created any faster just because we add a PLEX to the mix.
Quote:Through the character bazaar isk = sp, therefore we already have a mechanism for paying to win with sp Same here: all you're doing is trading time. No time is being skipped or accelerated.
SP boosts are bad because they skip time. They skip game mechanics. They break the balance of the game and impose a different rule set on people who pay cash than on those who do not. There's a reason why the rules strictly forbid anything that allows for GÇ£accumulation at an accelerated rateGÇ¥: because it is in every way bad for the game. It's so bad that they're willing to throw out paying customers and brand them as exploiters and cheaters and other nasty names, just to ensure that everyone else play by the same rules. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland Test Alliance Please Ignore
619
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:59:00 -
[163] - Quote
In response to OP: No.
Free Ripley Weaver! |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5737
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 15:59:00 -
[164] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:
I still don't get it... As a monthly paying customer where do i sign up for my free 700m from a plex sale? Oh wait no i have to PAY extra for that, how is that not the definition of pay-to-win?
Because that isk doesn't fly out of your wallet and explode people for you. PLEX is a trade (your cash for someone elses time). What you are asking for isn't a trade, its a direct CCP product, and even asking for that goes against what EVE is.
Quote: Through the character bazaar isk = sp, therefore we already have a mechanism for paying to win with sp.
No it is not. A noob in a Titan is still a noob. Pay to win would be a noob in a Titan that could actually win a fight with other players because he paid 50 bucks for 100 'no cool down" area affect DDs.
Quote: Is it such a stretch to allow this on someones personal account instead of having to buy someone elses?
YES. EVE is a player driven game.
Quote: To the second paragraph true and very fair, if plex and character bazaar weren't a thing i can't see sp boosts being a thing either.
Exactly bro.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2569
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:05:00 -
[165] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Are you stalking goons?! He's angry about a bunch of changes to highsec that have happened in the past 6 months & believes it's some nullsec-CCP conspiracy directly targetting him, so he's come up with a second conspiracy to make his first conspiracy kind of make sense to him & anyone stupid enough to take his word for it.
Man, is that the best you can come up with? I am surprised your propaganda team has not pulled your posting privileges.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
295
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:05:00 -
[166] - Quote
I really do not know why you are aguring this. Its very simple:
1) There is already a thing in place that you can go buy a GTC, convert to plex, sell the plex for isk and use the isk to get a skill boost. Its called... IMPLANTS! Learn them, use them, they will shave off a TON of training time.
2) If this goes to just noobs, then whats your definition of a noob? 1 week player? 1 month? 1 year? 5 year? And how long is that boost? as long as you pay for it? If you restrict it to a certin age you would see vets like me quit in droves, and then eve will die. But then it also defeats the point is you limit time. i.e. your new account can pay extra for thos boost feature till you are 1 year old.
3) if you open it to everyone, then you just made a pointless feature. You want this to catch up with the vets.. but if EVERYONE can do this, you will NEVER catch up. EVER. Because all the vets would just use this too, so you would ocne again be traning evenly.
This idea, is pointless, unneeded, and unwanted. Learn the game, use implants, and quit whining. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:06:00 -
[167] - Quote
Wouldn't make any difference.
Nor is it exclusive to new players, old players could conceivably use it too either on furthering their mains or for diversifying alts.
It amounts to just one more PLEX sink, and one more currency faucet for CCP.
It really makes no difference to any of us, if some random guy who is paying 2xPLEX per month, per character, gets for example, a 50-75% training boost.
I can understand people morally being upset that they spent 10 years to train a character, but anyone using boosts would still be expending the same amount of PLEX/cash in order to achieve that same SP total, infact much more. Only difference is it wouldn't take him 10 years to do so. But so what.
You took 10 years with 1xPLEX/money per month to get your total SP.
That guy will instead take 5yrs with 2xPLEX/money per month to get the same total SP.
(And thats assuming a 100% boost, which it would certainly not be).
If some guy is prepared to spend 2x Plex or 2xMoney per month, to get a 50-75% boost in training, I'm all for it. Makes ZERO difference to me. They are expending the same amount (infact a greater amount) of resources to get what only takes time for the conventional player. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3186
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:06:00 -
[168] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Man, is that the best you can come up with? I am surprised your propaganda team has not pulled your posting privileges.
Babes, is that the best you can come up with? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

DaReaper
Net 7 The Last Brigade
301
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:09:00 -
[169] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Wouldn't make any difference.
Nor is it exclusive to new players, old players could conceivably use it too either on furthering their mains or for diversifying alts.
It amounts to just one more PLEX sink, and one more currency faucet for CCP.
It really makes no difference to any of us, if some random guy who is paying 2xPLEX per month, per character, gets for example, a 50-75% training boost.
I can understand people morally being upset that they spent 10 years to train a character, but anyone using boosts would still be expending the same amount of PLEX/cash in order to achieve that same SP total, infact much more. Only difference is it wouldn't take him 10 years to do so. But so what.
You took 10 years with 1xPLEX/money per month to get your total SP.
That guy will instead take 5yrs with 2xPLEX/money per month to get the same total SP.
(And thats assuming a 100% boost, which it would certainly not be).
Yes but once again, as i just said, i could outspend him, easily, and then in the time it takes him to catch up, 5 years, during that 5 years i would of accelerated my own training and now i'm another 10 years ahead. So he NEVER catches up. EVER. So its basicly exactly what we have now. which makes this idea... drum roll please... and say it with me... P O I N T L E S S |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:11:00 -
[170] - Quote
DaReaper wrote:Yes but once again, as i just said, i could outspend him, easily, and then in the time it takes him to catch up, 5 years, during that 5 years i would of accelerated my own training and now i'm another 10 years ahead. So he NEVER catches up. EVER. So its basicly exactly what we have now. which makes this idea... drum roll please... and say it with me... P O I N T L E S S
You are assuming that I am saying anything about catching up.
Where the **** did you get that into your head?
Ofc old players could expend twice the PLEX/cash per month as well. I have no issue with that either.
If some guy is prepared to expend twice the cost, for a 50-75% boost to save time, then I have no problem with that. Go ahead and knock your socks off for as long as your PLEX/money lasts. ------------ |
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3186
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:12:00 -
[171] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: It amounts to just one more PLEX sink, and one more currency faucet for CCP.
Wait
So you are saying you dont mind then if, to stay "competitive" you had to spend, $20, $50 or $100 per month because you need to pour isk into skills?
Really? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20514
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:14:00 -
[172] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Wouldn't make any difference. GǪaside from breaking the skilling and attribute mechanics and unbalancing the game in a way that is expressly forbidden in the EULA.
Quote:It amounts to just one more PLEX sink, and one more currency faucet for CCP. Why is the former needed and what makes you think the second will happen in enough amounts to counter the loss of customers? Doesn't it strike you as odd to suggest a way of (supposedly) earning money for CCP that CCP so thoroughly abhors that they're currently willing to lose money by enforcing the exact opposite?
Quote:I can understand people morally being upset that they spent 10 years to train a character, but anyone using boosts would still be expending the same amount of PLEX/cash in order to achieve that same SP total, infact much more. Only difference is it wouldn't take him 10 years to do so. But so what. So paying to not have mechanics apply to you is inherently a bad idea. So it doesn't solve anything and is thoroughly unnecessary on top of being a bad idea. So it actually creates the problems it is intended to solve, making it a self-defeating idea on top of a bad and unnecessary one. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:17:00 -
[173] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:So you are saying you dont mind then if, to stay "competitive" you had to spend, $20, $50 or $100 per month because you need to pour PLEX into skills?
To "stay competitive"?
Wat?
If some guy is pouring twice the amount of PLEX/cash into his accounts as you are, then who deserves the competitive edge? Its an arbitrary difference that it would be used for skilling an existing character, rather than instead gradually growing a stable of alts, as has been the traditional format to expend excess PLEX/cash.
In both cases, a player who is dumping twice the PLEX/cash into the game, no matter in what form, is going to be "more competitive" than you are. We can agree on that, yes?
That the other guy is expending twice as much as you, for only 50-75% boost, does not make you uncompetitive. You are getting there much cheaper than he is, albeit, it is taking you a bit longer. You are therefore "competitive" in terms of having to expend less resources, to achieve the same end. ------------ |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
598
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:24:00 -
[174] - Quote
I think salvos fancys tippa. I can't see anything els this could actually be about. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:24:00 -
[175] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪaside from breaking the skilling and attribute mechanics and unbalancing the game in a way that is expressly forbidden in the EULA.
LOLWAT?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I knew you where bad, but I had no idea you where this terrible.
Source me where it is forbidden in the EULA.
Tippia wrote:Why is the former needed and what makes you think the second will happen in enough amounts to counter the loss of customers? Doesn't it strike you as odd to suggest a way for CCP to (supposedly) earn money that CCP abhors so thoroughly that they're currently willing to lose money by enforcing the exact opposite?
Dafuq does this even mean in English? Is your brain a knotted bowl of spaghetti?
Tippia wrote:So paying to not have mechanics apply to you is inherently a bad idea. So it doesn't solve anything and is thoroughly unnecessary on top of being a bad idea. So it actually creates the problems it is intended to solve, making it a self-defeating idea on top of a bad and unnecessary one. Yes, typical Tippia circular logic. Gets caught in a loop of her own false implications.
There is no "problem" with the current system. I do not support the suggestion of purchaseable boost as a "problem solution". I support it as an additional PLEX sink, money faucet, and to offer an alternative to players to skill faster, at additional cost, rather than having to wait 10 years of their life. It is an equitable and fair exchange. They pay MORE, and get a slight boost, in order to have to expend less time. There is no "problem" with that, unless you have one in your own attitudes and subjective bias.
That someone who expends twice the PLEX/cash, would train at 50-75% faster rate, does not cause any problems. It makes no difference to the rest of players who dont/wont/cant do it. They can continue training at the same rate, at the same expense, as they have throughout EVE. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20514
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:24:00 -
[176] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:If some guy is pouring twice the amount of PLEX/cash into his accounts as you are, then who deserves the competitive edge? The one who can play the game better.
Quote:Its an arbitrary difference that it would be used for skilling an existing character, rather than instead gradually growing a stable of alts, as has been the traditional format to expend excess PLEX/cash. No, it's not an arbitrary difference. In one case, everyone plays under the same rules and use the same mechanics; in the other, one is using completely different rules and bypasses a core mechanic. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:26:00 -
[177] - Quote
Tippia wrote: In one case, everyone plays under the same rules and use the same mechanics; in the other, one is using completely different rules and bypasses a core mechanic.
Everyone will still play under the same rules and the same mechanics. Everyone can make use of the boost. It doesn't matter whether the option has always been there, because everyone who has always been here hasn't used it anyways, because, it wasnt there.
Afterwards, everyone is still on the same level playing field. Old and new players, both, can use it from that point onwards. Its still "fair", for everyone.
Its your choice whether you put your PLEX into another month, another toon, or into a boost for one toon.
Everyone can do that. And everyone can choose not to do it. ------------ |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2834
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:27:00 -
[178] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:If some guy is pouring twice the amount of PLEX/cash into his accounts as you are, then who deserves the competitive edge? bugger off |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:29:00 -
[179] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:If some guy is pouring twice the amount of PLEX/cash into his accounts as you are, then who deserves the competitive edge? bugger off
You are being naive and narrow minded.
The PLEX could just as well be poured into hiring mercs or acquisition of advanced armaments. If someone is pouring more resources into a conflict, that is categorically a competitive edge. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3188
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:30:00 -
[180] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:I think salvos fancys tippa. I can't see anything els this could actually be about.
Im well jels naow
Just cos I had that thing with Anslo *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20515
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:31:00 -
[181] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Source me where it is forbidden in the EULA. EULA. Notice the part where they say you're not allowed to use game-external methods to acquire anything at an accelerated rate compared to normal gameplay?
Quote:Dafuq does this even mean in English? Read the edit. Again: they currently ban people (i.e. ensure that they make less money) who try to accelerate their accumulation ofGǪ wellGǪ anything, really. Doesn't it strike as odd to suggest that it's a good idea for them to make money on letting people accelerate the accumulation of something?
Quote:Yes, typical Tippia circular logic. How so?
Quote:There is no "problem" with the current system. Good. Then there's no need to break it in order to GÇ£solveGÇ¥ a problem that doesn't even exist.
Quote:I support it as an additional PLEX sink, money faucet, and to offer an alternative to players to skill faster, at additional cost, rather than having to wait 10 years of their life. Why? What problem does it solve? Is that solution worth breaking core game mechanics over? Is that solution worth losing players over? Is that solution worth reversing part of the EULA? Is that solution necessary considering what's already available? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3188
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:32:00 -
[182] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: To "stay competitive"?
You are the one who is fighting the corner of the concept of "winning the game"
Im playing by your rules.
I dont believe that competition is measured in Isk or SPs, but you seem to.
So, how much SHOULD a new player be expected to spend per month in order to, say for example, fly Battleships within two days? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20515
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:33:00 -
[183] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Everyone will still play under the same rules and the same mechanics. No. The ones who pay will use different rules and mechanics from those who do not. After all, that's the whole point of the suggestion: GÇ£I don't want to use the same mechanics as everyone else GÇö please let me pay to play the game using different rulesGÇ¥.
Quote:Everyone can do that. And everyone can choose not to do it. GǪand GÇ£don't use it if you don't like itGÇ¥ remains the most feeble excuse in favour of broken mechanics. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:44:00 -
[184] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Notice the part where they say you're not allowed to use game-external methods to acquire anything at an accelerated rate compared to normal gameplay?
You managed to drop even further on the intelligence scale.
So uou think a service provided by CCP would be game-external? You must be trolling. Nobody is this stupid. Furthermore, though you fail to understand that clause eefers to third party programs, the issue is alrrady quashed by the precedent of existing SP accelerators in various starter packs.
]Tippia wrote: NWhy? What problem does it solve? Is that solution worth breaking core game mechanics over? Is that solution worth losing players over? Is that solution worth reversing part of the EULA? Is that solution necessary considering what's already available?
There is "no problem" nor does it "solve any problem". Nor does it go against the EULA, of which even the suggestion you have made, has genuinely made me question what is wrong with you.
It merely provides a means for players to expend their PLEX/cash in an additional optional way. Everyone can use it, new and old. There is no unfair advantage to it, beacuse it is open to everyone.
Its just one other way to expend PLEX/cash. You dont "lose" anything as compared to another guy who spends an extra PLEX for a 50-75% boost. You will still get the same net SP, it will just take you a bit longer, but you dont have to PLEX for your net SP either.
Those with money, can buy it. Those with PLEX, can do it that way. Those who dont want to, can just use time instead to reach the same net SP total.
It doesnt create any problems, just another alternative, especially for people who have less time to spare.
Anyone who wants to reach a 10yr account SP total, would have to expend around 150%more PLEX/cash to do so, than someonw who sis it the conventional way. And it would still take them about 7 years to do so.
Nobody "loses".
And please, stop using the word "mechanic" wrong. ------------ |

PrettyMuch Always Right
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:49:00 -
[185] - Quote
Tippia wrote:EULA. Notice the part where they say you're not allowed to use game-external methods to acquire anything at an accelerated rate compared to normal gameplay?[/url] Now you're just being absurd. CCP adjusting their game into a new set of mechanics is not an EULA infraction. Tippia wrote:Read the edit. Again: they currently ban people (i.e. ensure that they make less money) who try to accelerate their accumulation ofGǪ wellGǪ anything, really. Doesn't it strike as odd to suggest that it's a good idea for them to make money on letting people accelerate the accumulation of something?[/quote ]They are banning people for breaking the EULA. If you are purchasing PLEX-for-SP through CCP, you are not breaking the EULA. You are confusing yourself by combining two entirely seperate things. Tippia wrote:Good. Then there's no need to break it in order to GǣsolveGǥ a problem that doesn't even exist. This idea is not a fix, this is new content. [quote=Tippia]I support it as an additional PLEX sink, money faucet, and to offer an alternative to players to skill faster, at additional cost, rather than having to wait 10 years of their life. Why? What problem does it solve? Is that solution worth breaking core game mechanics over? Is that solution worth losing players over? Is that solution worth reversing part of the EULA? Is that solution necessary considering what's already available? It's supposed to be something extra (hence ISK sink) to spend your ISK on. I don't think it's needed either, but I also don't think it's trying to fix a problem.
I actually agree with you Tippia. I don't like this idea much either. What I don't agree with is arguing against common logic to make my point, which you kind of have. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20519
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:51:00 -
[186] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:So uou think a service provided by CCP would be game-external? I sure as hell don't have any Gé¼ or $ in-gameGǪ
So: doesn't it strike you as odd to suggest they earn money on something they're currently willing to ban people over?
Quote:There is "no problem" nor does it "solve any problem". Then it is a worthless idea that has no benefit whatsoever (on top of being fundamentally bad for the game and self-defeating). If it doesn't solve any kind of problem, it is not needed.
Quote:It merely provides a means for players to expend their PLEX/cash in an additional optional way. GǪwhich isn't needed.
Quote:Its just one other way to expend PLEX/cash. GǪwhich isn't needed.
[quote]You dont "lose" anything as compared to another guy who spends an extra PLEX for a 50-75% boost.[/quote}This is just as incorrect as the first time you were wrong about it, and for the same reason. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:54:00 -
[187] - Quote
You dont need a cupholder in your car either, but it is an option, and lack of a cup holder is not a reason not to build a car.
A 50-75% boost for PLEX or cash somewhere between the cost of GTC and PLEX just offers an alternative way to invest it.
This is not a "problem", its a usedul option to those who wish to make use of it. Those who dont, can continue life in their car without a cupholder. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3188
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:57:00 -
[188] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Y Those who dont, can continue life in their car without a cupholder.
By cupholder, you appear to mean a turbocharged engine adding 250 extra BHP that, if misused will flip the car upside down and explode the occupants
But yeah totally  *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20522
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:58:00 -
[189] - Quote
PrettyMuch Always Right wrote:Now you're just being absurd. CCP adjusting their game into a new set of mechanics is not an EULA infraction. That wasn't the point either. The point is that accelerated acquisition compared to normal gameplay is such a bad thing GÇö in this game as in many others GÇö that they've explicitly put it in the rules that they'd rather not take your money than have it in the game.
Quote:This idea is not a fix, this is new content. It provides zero content. Also, read the OP: it is meant to fix the GÇ£problemGÇ¥ that there is a gulf between old and new players. Of course, it does nothing of the kind GÇö in fact, it does the exact opposite.
Quote:It's supposed to be something extra (hence ISK sink) to spend your ISK on. I don't think it's needed either, but I also don't think it's trying to fix a problem. It doesn't sink any ISK. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 16:59:00 -
[190] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:If i don't want to earn isk and buy a plex to sell, have i not skipped the isk generation mechanic? No. The ISK you're getting is generated in the normal way, by spending time collecting it through the regular in-game activities that accrue ISK. You are simply trading your (future) time against time they've spent in the past. PLEX don't create any ISK whatsoever. Quote:If i spend isk to buy a character already loaded with sp, have i not skipped the sp generation mechanic? No. The SP you're getting has been generated in the normal way, by spending time and ISK putting skills into a queue and waiting for them to complete. If you want 6 years worth of SP, it took 6 years to create them. You are also only ever getting old decisions GÇö not new ones. You are trading ISK to be spent in the future against ISK and time that has been spent in the past. The bazaar does not create any SP whatsoever. Quote:The other 2 don't apply because i'm not asking for a new mechanic. Yes you are. You're asking for a mechanic that skips other mechanics GÇö specifically the skill training and attribute mechanics GÇö and to be able to pay for the privilege of not having those mechanics apply to you the way they do to everyone else. The other two apply for the same reason: because they are examples of paying to not have mechanics apply to you the way they do to everyone else. The reason you don't feel that they apply is because the game breaking nature is so readily apparent in them, but fundamentally, it's the exact same kind of game breakage that you're asking for, and what you're asking for is very bad for the exact same reasons why those ideas are bad. Quote:Once again with new and old players it's relative. I don't see how offering a way to speed up sp gives an advantage to one over the other? Because one can take advantage of it and the other cannot. Be it because of lack of knowledge or funding or support structure, new players will only ever be able to GÇ£benefitGÇ¥ in the sense that they maintain the status quo, whereas old players GÇö who don't lack any of those GÇö will be able to push ahead in many new and interesting ways (that break the game).
The second you introduce paying usd for anything non cosmetic in game, you are allowing pay-to-win. In this case the exchange of paying someone else's game time (usd) for in game isk is pay-to-win and if you don't accept that you're clearly being ignorant.
The reason i don't see anything game breaking is because there isn't anything game breaking. No one will be an over night cap pilot, no one gets to fly a battleship on day 2, no characters will devalue, no new skills or items players don't already have are being added. There is nothing here except a pay to accelerate to what players already have, not to mention even at 2x or 3x the skill queues will be months to properly fly anything worthwhile.
I see your point of creating sp for usd but does that really matter? Does it really change anything in game if someone pays for bonus sp rates? I mean they can already trade perviously created sp for isk (usd), why not allow them to pay usd for future created sp? Time is the only factor and really serves no purpose when you are talking about speeding something up from 3 weeks to 1 week.
Still don't see how it benefits old over new players, both would receive the same rate gains. Just because a vet might be able to allocate better in no way prevents a newer player from doing the same. We don't cry about nerfing fittings just because is experience is a bonus. As far as personal finance goes everything in eve is purchasable with enough isk and isk is purchasable through plex, i would say that argument is moot until plex is removed.
|
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20522
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:00:00 -
[191] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:You dont need a cupholder in your car either, but it is an option, and lack of a cup holder is not a reason not to build a car. Cupholders don't let you drive at 120 MPH through a built-up area.
Quote:This is not a "problem", its a usedul option to those who wish to make use of it. GǪwhich isn't needed.
Quote:Old and new players can make equal use of it. GǪwhich defeats to the point of creating and then inverting the problem it was intended to fix.
Quote:Its not any different in that sense from the existing status quo. GǪexcept for the ability to pay cash to not have game mechanics apply to you. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:04:00 -
[192] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Y Those who dont, can continue life in their car without a cupholder. By cupholder, you appear to mean a turbocharged engine adding 250 extra BHP that, if misused will flip the car upside down and explode the occupants But yeah totally 
Its not that kind of P2W though. This isnt WoW. It doesnt supercharge your toons performance.
It just means for an additional expense, your toon trains faster. Other players who dont buy it will get there too, it just takes them a bit longer, and also costs them nothing additional.
Think about this contretely.
Lets say you and I both have 2 PLEXs. You choose to spend those to maintain one toon, and train it 50-75% faster. Whereas I choose to spend mine on maintaining two accounts, with 6 toons total. A third guy instead chooses to spend his by maintaining one account, and parallel training his 2nd toon on that account. A fourth guy decides to sell his for ISK to fund his terrible PvP endevours. Fifth guy uses one to convert to AUR, and maintain his main account with painted ships.
I have no problem with any of the above. Why do you? ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20523
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:14:00 -
[193] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:The second you introduce paying usd for anything non cosmetic in game, you are allowing pay-to-win. And that's the beauty of the PLEX system: it circumvents that problem by only making it an exchange of time. At no point do you get anything n-game that can't be had without cash GÇö no accelerated gameplay, no skipping of mechanics, no special rules, no GÇ£winGÇ¥ being obtained, nothing.
Quote:The reason i don't see anything game breaking is because there isn't anything game breaking. So you don't consider the fact that normal game mechanics no longer apply to you as something game-breaking? If I suddenly could spawn ISK out of thin air rather than have to interact with NPCs in long-winded ways, that would not break the game? If I suddenly could always warp at will no matter what, that would not break the game? If I suddenly no longer took damage from anything, that would not break the game?
Oh, and suddenly making the rules that regulate how characters progress over time different for those who pay for it would indeed instantly devalue the time spent on building every character in the game.
Quote:I see your point of creating sp for usd but does that really matter? Yes. It matters because all forms of skipping game mechanics are inherently bad for the game GÇö there's a reason why it is normally strictly prohibited in games to the point of having companies bar you from all their games forever.
Quote:Still don't see how it benefits old over new players, both would receive the same rate gains. Because of the reasons I listed: the new players will GÇö with perfect knowledge and equal access to support mechanics such as ISK and attributes and overall investment in the game (none of which they will have, due to being new) GÇö only at best maintain a status quo. For every little detail in which a new players deviates from that perfect scenario, old players will gain an advantage because they can leverage their knowledge, wallets, support structures, etc.
So at best, the GÇ£benefitGÇ¥ a new player gets is that they're exactly where they would be without this idea, making it pointless; at worst, the only people who'd benefit are old players, which would reverse the intended purpose of the idea. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:16:00 -
[194] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Jallukola wrote:As bafoon as that last paragraph in the OP sounds, I have a worried feeling CCP will not be shooting such proposal down. Reminds me of how Planetside 2 handles its access to competitive gear. I think they learned their lesson with the last time they thought about microtransactions of non-vanity items... Greed is good, right???
Atleast SOE has over the course of the game addressed the issue with very limited amount of Certification Points, and considerably increased the acquired amount, still leaning heavy towards Station Cash. On the upside, so has the starting gear recieved buffs easing the game introduction to new players.
But holy crap this thread. What exactly makes it so difficult to grasp for defenders why this is such a bad call? Oh hey I have an idea! How about, something along lines of GOLD AMMO from WoT, "get DPS boosts for the small price full month's playtime", hmm yes, yes? |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3189
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:17:00 -
[195] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Think about this contretely.
Lets say you and I both have 2 PLEXs. You choose to spend those to maintain one toon, and train it 50-75% faster. Whereas I choose to spend mine on maintaining two accounts, with 6 toons total. A third guy instead chooses to spend his by maintaining one account, and parallel training his 2nd toon on that account. A fourth guy decides to sell his for ISK to fund his terrible PvP endevours. Fifth guy uses one to convert to AUR, and maintain his main account with painted ships.
I have no problem with any of the above. Why do you?
I tend to agree I would prefer the option was PLEX specific, rather than purchaseable by cash. But it really makes very little objective difference. However that might reduce the kneejerk reaction some superficial people have ro any mention of cash transactions.
Because in order to do that a central and defining feature of the game (How quickly one trains skills) has to be modified without me knowing or trying to work out the possible outcomes such a change has on the nature of the game.
I dont make changes to a programme without working out the possible outcomes first
I dont change up a recipe without the same
I dont remove a Jenga block without at least making an educated guess as to why removing that block is a good idea.
Further, Ive already said that giving a new player the ability to train a BS in two weeks is a bad idea. Why? Well because that player will be in that ship with no idea how to operate it and will most likely have a bad time.
There are enough people out there with Tactical Shield Manipulation 5 as it is.
Oh, and it would pretty much make the Character Bizairre and Implants worthless over night. Which in the case of implants means rewriting all the loot tables involving implants.
And why stop at SPs?
Why not have ore available for 80m tons per $5 spent? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:22:00 -
[196] - Quote
For Tippia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanics
The game mechanic of SP is not changed.
There are already SP accelerators in starter packs. There are already implants in-game. There are already neural re-maps.
Did you complain like this when the "game mechanic" of only being able to train one character per account, was changed? For that you basically get 200% SP per month, as a sum total, across two characters, instead of only 150% on one toon, as would be the case in this. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3189
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:23:00 -
[197] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:For Tippia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_mechanicsThe game mechanic of SP is not changed. There are already SP accelerators in starter packs. There are already implants in-game. There are already neural re-maps. Did you complain like this when the "game mechanic" of only being able to train one character per account, was changed? For that you basically get 200% SP per month, as a sum total, across two characters, instead of only 150% on one toon, as would be the case in this.
Ill not answer as you said its for Tippia, but I can see around half a dozen mistakes in this post. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:26:00 -
[198] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Ill not answer as you said its for Tippia, but I can see around half a dozen mistakes in this post.
There are none.
Want to discuss it on voice? ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20523
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:27:00 -
[199] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:The game mechanic of SP is not changed. Incorrect.
Quote:There are already SP accelerators in starter packs. There are already implants in-game. There are already neural re-maps. GǪnone of which make the mechanics work differently if you pay extra compared to if you don't.
Quote:Did you complain like this when the "game mechanic" of only being able to train one character per account, was changed? Since the mechanics for acquiring SP on your character didn't change, no. All characters are still subject to the same rules and the same mechanics that determine the acquisition speed.
Quote:For that you basically get 200% SP per month, as a sum total, across two characters, instead of only 150% on one toon, as would be the case in this. GǪand that difference is why the latter breaks the game mechanics and the former does not. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3191
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:27:00 -
[200] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Ill not answer as you said its for Tippia, but I can see around half a dozen mistakes in this post. There are none. Want to discuss it on voice?
There are , and no, I have no wish to see your Boners Room ta :) *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:28:00 -
[201] - Quote
Quote:Old and new players can make equal use of it. GǪwhich defeats to the point of creating and then inverting the problem it was intended to fix.
Quote:Its not any different in that sense from the existing status quo. GǪexcept for the ability to pay cash to not have game mechanics apply to you.[/quote]
That is the beauty of eve sp, L5 skills mean very little unless they unlock something. Becoming proficient in something only takes a few months. For the most part new players will be able to catch up rather quickly in 1 specific area while vets would only be able to advance more rapidly in other areas.
You can already pay cash to not have sp or isk generation mechanics apply to you through plex. Sure those mechanics applied to someone else but they don't apply to you with the use of external usd. Ccp is still the middle man for such transactions and not to mention we all buy sp each month with our subscriptions already. |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:29:00 -
[202] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: If some guy is pouring twice the amount of PLEX/cash into his accounts as you are, then who deserves the competitive edge?
Congratulations! You have by your own words, described what P2W is all about.
I know my thread about active input was silly, feedback much appreciated, but I don't disregard or dismiss other players in my lines in that thread. It's quite easy thing to ask, as someone with excessive FPS ground, but do you even comprehend what are 3 cornerstones of any multiplayer game?
I'll let you on a secret; They are the netcode, game stability and game balance. The last one, balance is especially important, it is what keeps players in servers and lobbies, it is what makes people feel like they stand a chance.
You need to understand, that for players who Live The Game, the first 2, netcode and stability, are issue that even when badly escalated can be overlooked. Players put up a lot of garbage for the sake of having great matches. But in the end, it's the balance, the sense of being capable of actions, what is everything in the game. |

Cambarus
The Baros Syndicate
358
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:29:00 -
[203] - Quote
I really CBA to go through this entire thread to see if this has been posted, but a fair while back a bunch of people from FHC played around on the Chinese server because why not?
It was a brand new corp, full of new characters, most of whom were pvping less than 24 hours after being created.
This is their killboard
Probably the funniest kill of all
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:30:00 -
[204] - Quote
ITT: Kneejerk reactionists who haven't thought it through.
Shame really. EVE was supposed to have an intelligent community. ------------ |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2836
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:31:00 -
[205] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:There is "no problem" nor does it "solve any problem". ... It merely provides a means for players to expend their PLEX/cash in an additional optional way. ... Its just one other way to expend PLEX/cash.
suggestion: ccp sends thugs to your house to mug you. you pay a subcription premium for this service |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3191
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:33:00 -
[206] - Quote
Guys guys
When will we learn
We are only arguing with Salvos BECAUSE he is so right.
The proof is that he couldnt be wrong if THIS many people wnat to argue with him! *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:33:00 -
[207] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:suggestion: ccp sends thugs to your house to mug you. you pay a subcription premium for this service
What? ------------ |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5746
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:34:00 -
[208] - Quote
Aren't we lucky that these "brilliant idea" people aren't in charge of game design?
What they never understand it that they can hold the not so smart opinion of a thing (like adding pay to win features to a game that damn near died after some riots and unsubbing when the developers tried to add 'pay to get space blue jeans more expensive than real world ones') precisely because they aren't in charge and lose nothing for having such a dumb idea.
The above is why the features and ideas forum is such a cesspit of insanity. "Brilliant ideas" people aren't the kind of folk who can be honestly critical of their own thoughts. If they could, they'd have never posted their ridicules idea in the 1st place. |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2836
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:35:00 -
[209] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:suggestion: ccp sends thugs to your house to mug you. you pay a subcription premium for this service What? it's just a new plex sink, for ccp to make more money
i think we should support ccp |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20523
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:36:00 -
[210] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:That is the beauty of eve sp, L5 skills mean very little unless they unlock something. Becoming proficient in something only takes a few months. For the most part new players will be able to catch up rather quickly in 1 specific area while vets would only be able to advance more rapidly in other areas. GǪwhich is exactly why the core notion behind this whole idea is wrong-headed: it assumes a problem that doesn't actually exists and suggests a solution that, if anything, creates the supposed problem it tries to solve.
Quote:You can already pay cash to not have sp or isk generation mechanics apply to you through plex. No. PLEX does bypass GÇö or even interact with GÇö either of those mechanics. The SP and ISK generation mechanics work the same and have been applied as normal. Otherwise, you wouldn't have anything to buy. All PLEX does is let you trade your future time for time others have already put in (and at a very bad exchange rate for you). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:38:00 -
[211] - Quote
Ok lets try this a different way;
Im chasing Salvos through NPC null
I know there is a gatecamp that he has just passed through and I cant follow in my current ship
There's an inty on sale in this system but gasp its minmatar and I cant fly those because I havent trained Min Frig 5
Oh wait *BAM* drops $120 in PLEX into PLEX4SP
In 30 secs I learn it and after him again *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:38:00 -
[212] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:The proof is that he couldnt be wrong if THIS many people wnat to argue with him!
Argumentum ad publicum, and false implication as if I had ever stated the above.
Shame you won't voice comm. You could have recorded it and had me banned :D It is though, sincerely, my experience that talking helps resolve many written and literal misunderstandings. I know, for a FACT, that you are misreading what I have said. Possibly, I am yours as well. But as long as either of us insists in our misreading, there can be no way forward. ------------ |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:40:00 -
[213] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Benny Ohu wrote:suggestion: ccp sends thugs to your house to mug you. you pay a subcription premium for this service What? it's just a new plex sink, for ccp to make more money i think we should support ccp
Well, go ahead and pay CCP to send thugs to your own or your mom's house then, if that's what you believe and think.
I think you are taking your trolling a little too far here. ------------ |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2840
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:40:00 -
[214] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: Kneejerk reactionists who haven't thought it through.
Shame really. EVE was supposed to have an intelligent community. kneejerk reactions with reasoning explained in full  |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:41:00 -
[215] - Quote
Did you rage when alt-training on the same account was made possible? ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20524
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:42:00 -
[216] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Did you rage when alt-training on the same account was made possible? Learn to read.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:43:00 -
[217] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: Kneejerk reactionists who haven't thought it through.
Shame really. EVE was supposed to have an intelligent community. kneejerk reactions with reasoning explained in full 
Nope. No rational reasoning there.
Frankly this discussion reminds me of trying to convince a religious person that dinosaur bones weren't magically put there by some supernatural power. ------------ |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5747
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:44:00 -
[218] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: Kneejerk reactionists who haven't thought it through.
Shame really. EVE was supposed to have an intelligent community.
This is just projection.
What you are suggesting and defending here is basically the end of EVe as we know it and the beginning of an EVE that starts down the path that most unsuccessful/dead MMOs followed: pay to win. EVE has survived this long because (among other things) it doesn't give players those comfy "we as a game company care about you" short cuts that other games do.
I will never understand this drive you and folks like you have to turn EVE away from it's proven and successful path towards a way of doing things that has proven only that it fails. It doesn't make sense, it's almost as if you want to see EVE and CCP go under.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:45:00 -
[219] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Did you rage when alt-training on the same account was made possible? Learn to read.
*looks at text* *reads it* It says "Learn to read".
Is that an answer to my question? Nope.
Everytime you do this Tippia, this categorical inability or refusal to answer simple and direct questions, I laugh, hard. And the funniest thing about it? Is you actually have the audacity to expect others to answer your questions, when you categorically are incapable or unwilling to do the same in reciprocation. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:45:00 -
[220] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:The proof is that he couldnt be wrong if THIS many people wnat to argue with him! Argumentum ad publicum, and false implication as if I had ever stated the above. Its a joke, son Eye Ball Keep your "Eye" on the "Ball"? Geddit? I say, do you geddit?
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Shame you won't voice comm. You could have recorded it and had me banned :D. Why? Would you have done something to try to make me wreck my stuff and call you a ******? Apparently thats how you get banned these days
Salvos Rhoska wrote:It is though, sincerely, my experience that talking helps resolve many written and literal misunderstandings.I know, for a FACT, that you are misreading what I have said. Possibly, I am yours as well. But as long as either of us insists in our misreading, there can be no way forward.
Written and literal mean the same thing *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2841
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:45:00 -
[221] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Frankly this discussion reminds me of trying to convince a religious person that dinosaur bones weren't magically put there by some supernatural power. go on |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:46:00 -
[222] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:False slippery slope argument
If CCP had thought like you did, they would have stopped development the very day EVE went live. Afterall, everything since has just been a slippery slope away from that original product. ------------ |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5747
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:48:00 -
[223] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Ok lets try this a different way;
Im chasing Salvos through NPC null
I know there is a gatecamp that he has just passed through and I cant follow in my current ship
There's an inty on sale in this system but gasp its minmatar and I cant fly those because I havent trained Min Frig 5
Oh wait *BAM* drops $120 in PLEX into PLEX4SP
In 30 secs I learn it and after him again
lol, I'd almost pay a plex to see that.
Basically what you're dealing with is someone who is so dishonest that they believe their own lies lol. No amount of reason is going to break through that wall.
So much so that these types won't understand that what they think is such a great idea for new players (notice the OP stating the the "new player-veteran gap" is a motivation for this idea) is actually only a great idea for older players who (unlike new players) can throw in game isk generated PLEXes at their problems. Malcanis' law strikes again. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:48:00 -
[224] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Did you rage when alt-training on the same account was made possible? Learn to read. *looks at text* *reads it* It says "Learn to read". Is that an answer to my question? Nope. Everytime you do this Tippia, this categorical inability or refusal to answer simple and direct questions, I laugh, hard. And the funniest thing about it? Is you actually have the audacity to expect others to answer your questions, when you categorically are incapable or unwilling to do the same in reciprocation.
she did answer your question. You really didnt bother reading her answer, hence her asking you agian to L2R
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Did you complain like this when the "game mechanic" of only being able to train one character per account, was changed?
Tippia wrote: Since the mechanics for acquiring SP on your character didn't change, no. All characters are still subject to the same rules and the same mechanics that determine the acquisition speed. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:48:00 -
[225] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Written and literal mean the same thing I know.
I made the distinction for your benefit, to include that you are not only misunderstanding what I have written, but you are also misunderstanding its "literal" meaning. ------------ |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:50:00 -
[226] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:she did answer your question. You really didnt bother reading her answer, hence her asking you agian to L2R
Where. I must have overlooked it.
She has an annoying and terrible tendency to bury her answers in a context or under a quotation to which they do not apply.
If I ask a direct and simple question, I expect a direct and simple answer. I provide the same myself, in reciprocation. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20525
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:53:00 -
[227] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Nope. No rational reasoning there.
Frankly this discussion reminds me of trying to convince a religious person that dinosaur bones weren't magically put there by some supernatural power. You mean in the sense that you just make baseless assertions without being able to offer more in the way of support than GÇ£because I believe soGÇ¥, and without being able to account for the inherent contradictions between your claims and reality, and without being able to account for the repercussions of your claims, and even a pretty silly appeal to GÇ£well, you can believe what you wantGÇ¥ reconciliation even though your part is still purely faith-based and unproven?
Yes, your argumentative style is very religion-like.
Quote:Is that an answer to my question? Nope. Yes it is. It tells you to go back and actually read the answer rather than skip over it like you always do. Just because you don't want to acknowledge an answer that was given long ago doesn't mean I refuse to answer it. I just refuse to repeat it to indulge your dishonesty.
So: learn to read. Once you've read my answer, please respond to it. The answer will not change just because you keep ignoring it, like you're hoping it will.
Quote:If CCP had thought like you did, they would have stopped development the very day EVE went live. No. If they did what he suggested, it would have arrived to where they are today, perhaps with a bit fewer mistakes along the road. What they certainly wouldn't do is follow your suggestion of implementing things that are unnecessary, self-defeating, and with no reasoning behind it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5747
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:54:00 -
[228] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:False slippery slope argument If CCP had thought like you did, they would have stopped development the very day EVE went live. Afterall, everything since has just been a slippery slope away from that original product.
See what I mean by dishonesty? This guy is so tied to this bad idea that he needs to find a way to dismiss all dissent?
I'm not making a slippery slope argument. A slippery slope argument would be : 'what Salvos wants would lead to pay to win'. That's not slippery slope, what I'm saying is '[b]you done fell off the cliff already/b] so screw a slope lol.
No one has said EVE should not progress, we're saying that what you believe would be a good thing would actually be bad and only good progress should be pursued.
'Stupid' (such as adding pay to win to a game that doesn't need it and that would die from it) is not progress. |

Salvos Rhoska
1019
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:54:00 -
[229] - Quote
Tippia, want to discuss it in voice?
Do you have the balls? ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3192
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:55:00 -
[230] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:she did answer your question. You really didnt bother reading her answer, hence her asking you agian to L2R Where. I must have overlooked it.
I quoted it for you. In the post that you replied to.
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Written and literal mean the same thing I know. I made the distinction for your benefit, to include that you are not only misunderstanding what I have written, but you are also misunderstanding its "literal" meaning.
That is the single WORST, most appalling attempt to backpedal I have ever seen.
Congratulations. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20525
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:55:00 -
[231] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Where. I must have overlooked it. Wow. Twice in the same post. Learn to read, ffs! 
Quote:She has an annoying and terrible tendency to bury her answers in a context or under a quotation to which they do not apply. You mean GÇ£in the context of directly replying to a section where you question is being quoted in fullGÇ¥? Yes, I do that a lot, because that's where the answer applies.
Quote:If I ask a direct and simple question, I expect a direct and simple answer. I provide the same myself, in reciprocation. GǪaside from your tendency to try to avoid answering simple questions as much as you can, in or out of context, and instead just stonewalling the discussion because you know that if you did provide an answer, it would completely sink the rhetoric point you were trying to make.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:57:00 -
[232] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:That is the single WORST, most appalling attempt to backpedal I have ever seen.
Congratulations.
Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? I even paused at that point when I was writing the post, and decided DELIBERATELY to include the "literal" part so that my statement would also carry the definitions of that word, additionally to "written".
You DO know that they are not the same word, right? And that their definitions carry nuances and specifics unique to each? ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20527
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:58:00 -
[233] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? Yes. Why would you be any more aware of that than you are of anything else? Consistency of this kind is very appealing to the mind. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 17:59:00 -
[234] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? Yes. Why would you be any more aware of that than you are of anything else?
What? Thats like saying "I saw an apple fall from that tree, therefore there must be no more apples left in that tree". I don't even.
Tippia circular logic again.
Will you take me up on my invitation to voice? You can freely record it and distribute it as you wish. ------------ |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:00:00 -
[235] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:The second you introduce paying usd for anything non cosmetic in game, you are allowing pay-to-win. And that's the beauty of the PLEX system: it circumvents that problem by only making it an exchange of time. At no point do you get anything in-game that can't be had without cash GÇö no accelerated gameplay, no skipping of mechanics, no special rules, no GÇ£winGÇ¥ being obtained, nothing. Quote:The reason i don't see anything game breaking is because there isn't anything game breaking. So you don't consider the fact that normal game mechanics no longer apply to you as something game-breaking? If I suddenly could spawn ISK out of thin air rather than have to interact with NPCs in long-winded ways, that would not break the game? If I suddenly could always warp at will no matter what, that would not break the game? If I suddenly no longer took damage from anything, that would not break the game? Oh, and suddenly making the rules that regulate how characters progress over time different for those who pay for it would indeed instantly devalue the time spent on building every character in the game. Quote:I see your point of creating sp for usd but does that really matter? Yes. It matters because all forms of skipping game mechanics are inherently bad for the game GÇö there's a reason why it is normally strictly prohibited in games to the point of having companies bar you from all their games forever. Quote:Still don't see how it benefits old over new players, both would receive the same rate gains. Because of the reasons I listed: the new players will GÇö with perfect knowledge and equal access to support mechanics such as ISK and attributes and overall investment in the game (none of which they will have, due to being new) GÇö only at best maintain a status quo. For every little detail in which a new players deviates from that perfect scenario, old players will gain an advantage because they can leverage their knowledge, wallets, support structures, etc. So at best, the GÇ£benefitGÇ¥ a new player gets is that they're exactly where they would be without this idea, making it pointless; at worst, the only people who'd benefit are old players, which would reverse the intended purpose of the idea.
I see we are at an impasse
1) if i trade real life dollars for in game items i wouldn't otherwise have, how is this not paying to win regardless of where the item came from. If i buy diablo 2 items off a third party web site is this not paying to win? The only way plex would make any difference is if game time it granted wasn't paid for with usd. Just because you add an extra step does not change the fact it's an exchange of usd for an in game item.
2) Sp is generated by 2 things time + usd all we are asking for is to have the time reduced and the usd increased, the ratio still stays the same. 4 + 1 = 5 the same way 2 + 3 = 5. We aren't adding or taking anything away just asking for a different distribution
3) Wrong sp are static meaning a vet can only go so far in one field. This would allow a new player to close the gap in a particular field much quicker. While still allowing the vet to branch out into a new field quicker, offering different benefits to both without hindering either . As far as personal bank balances go this is no more "cheating" then buying plex to sell for isk and 100% optional like the aforementioned plex for isk.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3195
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:00:00 -
[236] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:That is the single WORST, most appalling attempt to backpedal I have ever seen.
Congratulations. Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? I even paused at that point when I was writing the post, and decided DELIBERATELY to include the "literal" part so that my statement would also carry the definitions of that word, additionally to "written". You DO know that they are not the same word, right? And that their definitions carry nuances and specifics unique to each?
You are now officially considered both Troll and KOS target by myself, my corp and soon my Alliance
This is not a threat
This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not
This is a fact
Be seeing you *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2842
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:01:00 -
[237] - Quote
can we talk about the definition of 'circular logic' next, please |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
564
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:02:00 -
[238] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Those are fail reasons, and not "problems" whatsoever. How so? Please, are you joking? You genuinely can't grasp that if someone expends RL money or PLEX for accelerated SP, then he is spending MORE than someone who is skilling conventionally? It doesn't "break" any mechanic. Do you not even know what "mechanic" means, in terms of game design? Apparently you don't. Makes no difference to you, or me, whatsoever, if some third guy spends an additional PLEX or dollars per month for some % of accelerated training. No difference AT ALL. It makes no difference to anyone else in the game, what rate someone who spends money or PLEX on an accelerated rate, does. If you don't want to buy it, then don't. You can continue skilling at the same rate you always have. If some people expend an additional PLEX per month for an accelerated rate, or additional currency in addition to gametime, so what? Doesn't cause a problem in Bazaar either, because any character that is "grown" for sale through an accelerated SP rate, also incurs more costs in its production. So it will never be cheaper than a vanilla grown toon that takes longer. This is really elementary stuff that anyone with a modicum of objective perspective and capacity to fathom a simple abstract model and its repercussions, can easily comprehend.
LOL..the reason Tip cannot agree is because that would remove his reason to argue.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20527
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:02:00 -
[239] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:What? You have a long history of having a hard time understanding the differences (or lack thereof) between things. Why would your knowledge of the words GÇ£literalGÇ¥ and GÇ£writtenGÇ¥ be any different.
Quote:Tippia circular logic again. How so? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
564
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:03:00 -
[240] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:That is the single WORST, most appalling attempt to backpedal I have ever seen.
Congratulations. Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? I even paused at that point when I was writing the post, and decided DELIBERATELY to include the "literal" part so that my statement would also carry the definitions of that word, additionally to "written". You DO know that they are not the same word, right? And that their definitions carry nuances and specifics unique to each? You are now officially considered both Troll and KOS target by myself, my corp and soon my Alliance This is not a threat This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not This is a fact Be seeing you Ohhh noooos.....someone is getting beat up after school in the Piggly Wiggly parking lot.  |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:04:00 -
[241] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:You are now officially considered both Troll and KOS target by myself, my corp and soon my Alliance
This is not a threat
This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not
This is a fact
Be seeing you
Knickers in a twist there, lady?
After reading my posts, as I know you have, do you REALLY believe that I do not know the difference between "literal" and "written"? Do you REALLY believe that your attempt to jab at me with that false implication, would stick? Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D
Furthermore, "written" and "literal" are not the same word. They do not mean the same thing, as you claim they do. So in your fatty attempt to jab, you actually face-planted quite hard on that. ------------ |

BoBoZoBo
Paragon Fury Tactical Narcotics Team
412
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:05:00 -
[242] - Quote
It already is. - I pay every month, and I get to win.
Buying better equipment never made anyone inherently better at the task. You can already buy a skilled character with all the trimmings or PLEX to buy all the toys. What you can't to is buy the skill and experience not to have it taken from you.
The same **** happens in life, people with more experience will all ways have an edge. Your friends bigger problem is not understanding that difference. Primary Test Subject GÇó SmackTalker Elite |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:06:00 -
[243] - Quote
So, Tippia.
Voice?
Record and distribute it as you wish. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3196
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:07:00 -
[244] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:[ Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D
This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:08:00 -
[245] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll
Please, tell me again, how you claim that "written" and "literal" are the same word, and mean exactly the same thing?
Care to repeat that?
Also. Love all the "does not bother me, but I now randomly announce that KOS for my entire alliance whom are all under my influence lolz". Clearly not bothered, no. ------------ |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3964
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:10:00 -
[246] - Quote
DaReaper wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:It wouldn't make a bit of difference to anyone else.
It doesn't "break" any game mechanic.
It just means that players who have PLEX or currency at hand, can achieve their skill goals sooner. So what. They are doing it by expending more resources in that time period, to do so. Overall, they will have spent atleast as much PLEX/money, and probably much more, than any conventional player. The only difference, is time.
In order to do so, they have to use PLEX or purchase the boost with currency, both of which are good for the game overall. You already can, there are these nice things called implants. You can take the isk you would of used for a plex and buy a set of +5's. Then you will train WAY faster then i will, even though i have been here for 10 years, i die WAY too much for implants. So you already have a 'sp boost' Why should you be rewarded for coming to a 10 year game now, when I have been here since the nearly the beginning? This would break game mechanics and you would see a ton of vets quit over this. And if they open it up to everyone, then you would STILL never catch up. Because again, as a 10 year vet, i know pretty much this game backwards and farwards, and i can easily make more money then you, so i could always just keep getting plex and keep boosting. So you would STILL get no advantage, thus making this idea pointless.
This. A 10 year old vet is WAY MORE entitled to goodies and special offers then a new player.
After all, he has been funding CCP for a much longer time. 10 x 12 x 15 (not taking into account special offers etc) = 1800 dollar.
And that is also without any PLEX for ISK injection or what so ever.
So why should a 3 week old guy been given an advantage over the vets (yes, it is an advantage as the vet did NOT have the same bonus when he started. He even got nerfs compared to the newbies now by ways of no skillqueue (yeah, alarmclock skill updating) and learning skills).
OP...2 things for you.
A. Learn how the game works B. Learn how new players are already having a much easier time now a days.
Do that, untill then...stop posting as all you do is making the vets laugh at your stupid ideas about turning EVE into wow. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3196
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:11:00 -
[247] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll Please, tell me again, how you claim that "written" and "literal" are the same word, and mean exactly the same thing? Care to repeat that? Also. Love all the "does not bother me, but I now randomly announce that KOS for my entire alliance whom are all under my influence lolz". Clearly not bothered, no.
Troll on. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5750
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:12:00 -
[248] - Quote
BoBoZoBo wrote:
The same **** happens in life, people with more experience will all ways have an edge. Your friends bigger problem is not understanding that difference.
As an aside, this is why most games are the way they are (ie "you are the hero!!") and why people actually desire pay to win.
Lots of gamers are folks trying to get away from a sucky real life and modern games let them 'win' at something (unlike games from when i was younger, that kicked your ass and made you like it so much that you kept feeding the game the quarters you extorted from your mom lol). But even in games they have to face some uncomfortable realities (like 'not being able to catch up' with older players) so game companies bend to them again and again so they can win at something and feel good about themselves and pay for the privilege.
EVE is damn near the last bastion of "you suck, we know you suck, now PROVE you don't suck using only your wits" gaming and some people can't stand it and want it , too, to be 'pay to win' so they can feel good about what they are doing.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:13:00 -
[249] - Quote
Makes no difference between vets and noobs.
Both could use it.
You seem to be under the impression I am concerned with new players catching up to Vets. I am not. That was the other guy.
At 50-75% boost, it would still take 7years and cost MUCH more for the new player to match a 10yr Vet. And at the same time, the Vet can be using the same boost option to get even further in his training.
The change wouldn't make any difference, for an advanced player could use the boost just as effectively as a new player can. Ergo: no problems. ------------ |

Cpt Swagg
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:14:00 -
[250] - Quote
I'm new to the game but I can tell that it's already 100% pay to win.
Which is quite disappointing tbh, since I hate pay to win games, or even feel that I'm playing one.
You can buy PLEX and with it you can buy anything in this game. Even people.
100% pay to win :/ |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:14:00 -
[251] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Troll on. Just because you get upset about something, does not mean you are being trolled. ------------ |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
599
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:15:00 -
[252] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia, want to discuss it in voice?
Do you have the balls?
told you he fancys her Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:15:00 -
[253] - Quote
Here, go get some Riverdance.
If you understand the message behind this, you will understand why the thread is so upset about training time boosts. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3200
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:16:00 -
[254] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Troll on. Just because you get upset about something, does not mean you are being trolled.
It does when it comes from a Troll. In fact its the very definition. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3200
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:17:00 -
[255] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Tippia, want to discuss it in voice?
Do you have the balls?
told you he fancys her
Only cos I wouldnt cyber with him in his boners room
Though "boners" is such an exaggeration in his case *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Benny Ohu
Beneath the Ashes Margin of Silence
2843
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:18:00 -
[256] - Quote
mario games do the levels for you if you fail too many times :(
it's time to welcome the new style of quarter-feeding: free phone app lets the player win for five minutes, then demands credit card details for the next five minutes of failing to provide a challenge |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:19:00 -
[257] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Troll on. Just because you get upset about something, does not mean you are being trolled. It does when it comes from a Troll. In fact its the very definition.
Who was the one who tried to make a jab at "written" and "literal", (wrongly) claiming they mean the same thing? Was that me? Nope. ------------ |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3966
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:19:00 -
[258] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Ill not answer as you said its for Tippia, but I can see around half a dozen mistakes in this post. There are none. Want to discuss it on voice?
Only if you join me in my bonus room on TS. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:20:00 -
[259] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Ill not answer as you said its for Tippia, but I can see around half a dozen mistakes in this post. There are none. Want to discuss it on voice? Only if you join me in my bonus room on TS.
Sure! Send me details and I'll be there promptly after a smoke. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3200
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:21:00 -
[260] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Who was the one who tried to make a jab at "written" and "literal", (wrongly) claiming they mean the same thing? Was that me? Nope.
Shrug who cares? Keep trolling, you may get a partial ban from CCP if we are all lucky *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3972
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:21:00 -
[261] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:ITT: Kneejerk reactionists who haven't thought it through.
Shame really. EVE was supposed to have an intelligent community.
Yeah. Until you joined the community. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20528
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:26:00 -
[262] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:1) if i trade real life dollars for in game items i wouldn't otherwise have GǪyou would be banned for RMT.
Quote:how is this not paying to win regardless of where the item came from. Because by using PLEX, you're not buying any GÇ£winGÇ¥ GÇö you're recompensing people for time they've spent acquiring the items and ISK by giving them more time to keep doing so in the future. You're getting a pretty bad deal out of it, too, since if you just applied that time to yourself, you could earn a whole lot more with it than what you traded it for. It may just be me, but I don't really equate GÇ£pay to get a whole lot less for your time you paid for than what the time is actually worthGÇ¥ with GÇ£pay to winGÇ¥.
More importantly, it's not pay to win because what you get is stuff that is already in the game GÇö already acquired through normal means limited by all the existing mechanics put into place to limit that exact thing. The supposed advantage is already in the game and in practice offers no actual advantage since people already have them in abundance; they're so common and so not-advantageous that they're willing to give them up to you after all.
Nothing you buy can't be had without paying for it, as demonstrated by the fact that those who are selling it to you got it without paying for it. If all of that can be had anyway, what GÇ£advantageGÇ¥ do you believe that you're buying with your PLEX?
A PLEX is just a call option for game time (or AUR) without maturity. Even though it can be traded back and forth like any other instrument, nothing you can exercise it against offers any in-game advantage. Without such an advantage, and with everything you can trade it against already being in-game and acquired though other means, how can it ever be P2W?
Quote:Sp is generated by 2 things time + usd Actually, that's just one thing: cash, since time is created by cash and cash alone. What you're asking for is that you'll be allowed to spend more cash to make your first cash be worth more than someone else's cash. You're asking for the rules that determine how much time they get out of the deal to be different from the ones that decide how much you get out of yours. Letting people bypass or imbalance rules like that is a very bad thing GÇö so bad that it's often a bannable offence to do so GÇö and adding cash to the mix doesn't make it any better.
Quote:Wrong sp are static meaning a vet can only go so far in one field. You're assuming that when I say GÇ£old playersGÇ¥ I mean that they will apply this to their old characters. I don't. They will do that too, off course, and keep that SP gap people keep complaining about constant. But they will also do a much more potent thing, and that is to create special-purpose alts that will quickly top anything the new player can do with his one multi-role character. This means that the new players will not be able to close the gap to old characters, but they will also increasingly lag behind new characters owned by those old players. Again, at best, the new players can maintain a status quo (which makes the idea pointless); at worst, it will give old players more benefits (making the idea work for the exact opposite of its intended purpose).
Also, punctuation, please!  GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3972
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:27:00 -
[263] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Ok lets try this a different way;
Im chasing Salvos through NPC null
I know there is a gatecamp that he has just passed through and I cant follow in my current ship
There's an inty on sale in this system but gasp its minmatar and I cant fly those because I havent trained Min Frig 5
Oh wait *BAM* drops $120 in PLEX into PLEX4SP
In 30 secs I learn it and after him again lol, I'd almost pay a plex to see that. Basically what you're dealing with is someone who is so dishonest that they believe their own lies lol. No amount of reason is going to break through that wall. So much so that these types won't understand that what they think is such a great idea for new players (notice the OP stating the the "new player-veteran gap" is a motivation for this idea) is actually only a great idea for older players who (unlike new players) can throw in game isk generated PLEXes at their problems. Malcanis' law strikes again.
I just love how Salvos rages at everybody but this post. As this example is solid proof how terribad his idea is.
But he wont touch that, as the only option after reading it was to conceed defeat and unsub. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3972
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:31:00 -
[264] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Makes no difference between vets and noobs. Both could use it. You seem to be under the impression I am concerned with new players catching up to Vets. I am not. That was the other guy. At 50-75% boost, it would still take 7years and cost MUCH more for the new player to match a 10yr Vet. And at the same time, the Vet can be using the same boost option to get even further in his training. The change wouldn't make any difference, for an advanced player could use the boost just as effectively as a new player can. Ergo: no problems.
Uhm. If both could use it....whats the point of having it...
Troll on for the time you have till thread padlocked. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:32:00 -
[265] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:I just love how Salvos rages at everybody but this post. As this example is solid proof how terribad his idea is.
But he wont touch that, as the only option after reading it was to conceed defeat and unsub.
And I love how you still haven't delivered your TS details. Did you ignore that post?
Also, you are confusing me with OP. I'm not the same guy, and his views are not mine. ------------ |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2178
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:37:00 -
[266] - Quote
No, not now, not tomorrow, not ever.
Pointless bling, that is all that is acceptable. This is not a signature. |

BrundleMeth
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
96
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:49:00 -
[267] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:You arw forgetting that the vast majority of EVE players will leave if CCP does this... Good riddance...to them and you. Geez you're a snivelling whiner....in every post...
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:No, not now, not tomorrow, not ever.
Pointless bling, that is all that is acceptable. Yes, I'm just so wantng a Gold Tooth with a little diamond embedded in it... |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
1152
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 18:52:00 -
[268] - Quote
EvE is as PTW as it can get already, hard to go much farther.
You can buy any character, any ship, any implant, any officer mod, with cash, thru the plex system. That is PTW. What you can't buy is the skill to understand how to use it, and no amount of gold ammo is going to change that....
CCP: "We know what's best for the game, so you can't have any options....." |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:16:00 -
[269] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:1) if i trade real life dollars for in game items i wouldn't otherwise have GǪyou would be banned for RMT. Quote:how is this not paying to win regardless of where the item came from. Because by using PLEX, you're not buying any GÇ£winGÇ¥ GÇö you're recompensing people for time they've spent acquiring the items and ISK by giving them more time to keep doing so in the future. You're getting a pretty bad deal out of it, too, since if you just applied that time to yourself, you could earn a whole lot more with it than what you traded it for. It may just be me, but I don't really equate GÇ£pay to get a whole lot less for your time you paid for than what the time is actually worthGÇ¥ with GÇ£pay to winGÇ¥. More importantly, it's not pay to win because what you get is stuff that is already in the game GÇö already acquired through normal means limited by all the existing mechanics put into place to limit that exact thing. The supposed advantage is already in the game and in practice offers no actual advantage since people already have them in abundance; they're so common and so not-advantageous that they're willing to give them up to you after all. Nothing you buy can't be had without paying for it, as demonstrated by the fact that those who are selling it to you got it without paying for it. If all of that can be had anyway, what GÇ£advantageGÇ¥ do you believe that you're buying with your PLEX? A PLEX is just a call option for game time (or AUR) without maturity. Even though it can be traded back and forth like any other instrument, nothing you can exercise it against offers any in-game advantage. Without such an advantage, and with everything you can trade it against already being in-game and acquired though other means, how can it ever be P2W? Quote:Sp is generated by 2 things time + usd Actually, that's just one thing: cash, since time is created by cash and cash alone. What you're asking for is that you'll be allowed to spend more cash to make your first cash be worth more than someone else's cash. You're asking for the rules that determine how much time they get out of the deal to be different from the ones that decide how much you get out of yours. Letting people bypass or imbalance rules like that is a very bad thing GÇö so bad that it's often a bannable offence to do so GÇö and adding cash to the mix doesn't make it any better. Quote:Wrong sp are static meaning a vet can only go so far in one field. You're assuming that when I say GÇ£old playersGÇ¥ I mean that they will apply this to their old characters. I don't. They will do that too, off course, and keep that SP gap people keep complaining about constant. But they will also do a much more potent thing, and that is to create special-purpose alts that will quickly top anything the new player can do with his one multi-role character. This means that the new players will not be able to close the gap to old characters, but they will also increasingly lag behind new characters owned by those old players. Again, at best, the new players can maintain a status quo (which makes the idea pointless); at worst, it will give old players more benefits (making the idea work for the exact opposite of its intended purpose). Also, punctuation, please! 
Sorry on my iphone makes punctuation and proof reading pretty bad.
How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item.
Regardless of this reimbursing someone for time played or who gets the better deal or it was already there nonsense logic says it's usd for in game items.
Here is an example of pay to win. My win is to be able to plex my account each month by running level 4s; With pay to win Spend $200 on plex and sell them for 7bil. Go to character bazaar, buy tengu pilot, log in, buy a tengu, win game
Alternative w/o paying Spend the next 8 months properly skilling to fly and fit a tengu while grinding l3s to earn enough isk to pay for it once skills are completed. Win game
Option A takes months less time due to external money. That is the very definition of pay to win and very possible and accepted in eve.
So pay to win is not a concern since it's already in the game.
Purchasing an item that doesn't exist in game with real money is the issue here. As i stated sp = time + usd if it was just cash we would not be having this debate. On top of paying cash for your sub you need to wait time to earn the sp so it is a combo of the two. Ccp has made several changes in skills and training times of skills so it's not like we are setting new ground here to ask for a way to pay to lower the time and offset it with more cash.
Let me explain where something like this would be useful to a new player When i first started i signed up via the buddy program and was given 500m as a thank you. I spent the first 2 months afk waiting to be able to fly something capable of doing an l4 since the profits from l1, 2, 3 were just so laughable compared to what i already had in the bank. I would have gladly paid $30 at that point to be able to play weeks sooner. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3212
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:20:00 -
[270] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:
How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item. .
How does it convert back into $$$ though?
This has to happen before its RMT
Otherwise you are just paying for the right to access a server and use virtual tools on that server *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
29
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:23:00 -
[271] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Organic Lager wrote:
How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item. .
How does it convert back into $$$ though? This has to happen before its RMT Otherwise you are just paying for the right to access a server and use virtual tools on that server
Isk -> Plex -> game time -> usd not paid |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:24:00 -
[272] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
How does it convert back into $$$ though?
Because a PLEX can be converted to an ETC, retaining most of its value. Which is also why EVE's ISK is the only virtual currency that can be tied to a real currency, the spent sheckels don't really disappear anywhere until the PLEX is activated to whatever purpose.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3213
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:26:00 -
[273] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Organic Lager wrote:
How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item. .
How does it convert back into $$$ though? This has to happen before its RMT Otherwise you are just paying for the right to access a server and use virtual tools on that server Isk -> Plex -> game time -> usd not paid
1) that PLEX didnt materialise out of thin air
2) how does your game time convert into real world currency? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3213
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:27:00 -
[274] - Quote
Jallukola wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
How does it convert back into $$$ though?
Because a PLEX can be converted to an ETC, retaining most of its value. Which is also why EVE's ISK is the only virtual currency that can be tied to a real currency, the spent sheckels don't really disappear anywhere until the PLEX is activated to whatever purpose.
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/30_Day_Pilot's_License_Extension#Convert_ETC_Into_PLEX
Where does it go the other way? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2571
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:29:00 -
[275] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:That is the single WORST, most appalling attempt to backpedal I have ever seen.
Congratulations. Do you REALLY, seriously, believe I don't know the definitions of the words "written" and "literal"? I even paused at that point when I was writing the post, and decided DELIBERATELY to include the "literal" part so that my statement would also carry the definitions of that word, additionally to "written". You DO know that they are not the same word, right? And that their definitions carry nuances and specifics unique to each? You are now officially considered both Troll and KOS target by myself, my corp and soon my Alliance This is not a threat This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not This is a fact Be seeing you
Well..let's do some research. According to Chribba's Eve Who site, Ramona's corp consists of 4 chars all with the same last name, so safe to say they are all alts of her's. Her 91 pilot alliance is an industrial based alliance, based on their own description.
According to zKillboard, the alliance has 30 kills, and 120 losses. Most of the losses are around Dodixie and in the FW zone of Kourmonen. Last kill was Fed Navy Comet 2 days ago in a FW zone, but I can't tell if it was an FW based fight, or just something that happened.
Looks like the alliance was war-decced twice in 2014, and I believe both times by griefer corps.
So bottom line, don't think that Salvos has a lot to worry about, given that the alliance is industry based, with corps like "Roid Killers" and "United Research and Development". Now, maybe they have ties to a PvP outfit, but from what I am seeing, plus given that Council of Peace and Prosperity is NBSI, I would say that Ramona's threat rings a little hollow. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Desivo Delta Visseroff
Cataclysmic Paradox
200
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:34:00 -
[276] - Quote
Pay-to-Win is on the way out. The new model is Data-Mine-to-Win. The last time you installed a free game on your mobile/tablet, did you check the permissions???
In closing: Screw all Free-to-Play and Pay-to-Win gaming models. |

J'Poll
CDG Playgrounds Affirmative.
3976
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:34:00 -
[277] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:
Sorry on my iphone makes punctuation and proof reading pretty bad.
How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item.
Regardless of this reimbursing someone for time played or who gets the better deal or it was already there nonsense logic says it's usd for in game items.
Here is an example of pay to win. My win is to be able to plex my account each month by running level 4s; With pay to win Spend $200 on plex and sell them for 7bil. Go to character bazaar, buy tengu pilot, log in, buy a tengu, win game
Alternative w/o paying Spend the next 8 months properly skilling to fly and fit a tengu while grinding l3s to earn enough isk to pay for it once skills are completed. Win game
Option A takes months less time due to external money. That is the very definition of pay to win and very possible and accepted in eve.
So pay to win is not a concern since it's already in the game.
Purchasing an item that doesn't exist in game with real money is the issue here. As i stated sp = time + usd if it was just cash we would not be having this debate. On top of paying cash for your sub you need to wait time to earn the sp so it is a combo of the two. Ccp has made several changes in skills and training times of skills so it's not like we are setting new ground here to ask for a way to pay to lower the time and offset it with more cash.
Let me explain where something like this would be useful to a new player When i first started i signed up via the buddy program and was given 500m as a thank you. I spent the first 2 months afk waiting to be able to fly something capable of doing an l4 since the profits from l1, 2, 3 were just so laughable compared to what i already had in the bank. I would have gladly paid $30 at that point to be able to play weeks sooner.
God, I love your example.
Option A is clearly pay to win, you are throwing money so that you can accelerate getting to point "X" quicker then option B.
Textbook example of Pay 2 Win. Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy
Ever wanted to PvP but can't find people to fly with. Look no further and this chat: Redemption Road |

Faenir Antollare
University of Caille Gallente Federation
225
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:37:00 -
[278] - Quote
"...top anything the new player can do with his one multi-role character." (Tippia)
As a relatively new player, who has bought plex just to sell for isk so as to buy that char, that is absolutely spot-on!
It's far to easy as it is and would like to say to the OP that that does not make for a healthy future in New Eden.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:41:00 -
[279] - Quote
J'Poll wrote:Textbook example of Pay 2 Win, you paid money to get an advantage on someone who isn't paying money.
Which you can already do in Character Bazaar.
Also, still waiting for that TS invite. ------------ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3213
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:42:00 -
[280] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat
What threat?
The one where I said I would kill him on sight?
Why do I need backup to do that?
Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |
|

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:44:00 -
[281] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat What threat? The one where I said I would kill him on sight? Why do I need backup to do that? Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise.
I wish you where cute when you are angry. But you're an ugly mad :(
And all this, because "literal" and "written" are infact two distinct and separate words. So much hate... ------------ |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:47:00 -
[282] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jallukola wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
How does it convert back into $$$ though?
Because a PLEX can be converted to an ETC, retaining most of its value. Which is also why EVE's ISK is the only virtual currency that can be tied to a real currency, the spent sheckels don't really disappear anywhere until the PLEX is activated to whatever purpose. https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/30_Day_Pilot's_License_Extension#Convert_ETC_Into_PLEXWhere does it go the other way? My bad, forgot to mention it's an indirect method.
Like you know a single ETC corresponds 2xPLEX, but instead of trading the code directly, you trade the ETC for the correspoding price after the variables and currency conversion rates throught the secure trading.
PLEX retains value while ETC is always considered worth real money. I believe this is the only way RMT->ISK is allowed, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. |

Desivo Delta Visseroff
Cataclysmic Paradox
201
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:47:00 -
[283] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat What threat? The one where I said I would kill him on sight? Why do I need backup to do that? Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise. I wish you where cute when you are angry. But you're an ugly mad :( And all this, because "literal" and "written" are infact two distinct and separate words. So much hate...
Best thing to happen to this thread is the current derailment.
Please continue..... |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3214
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:49:00 -
[284] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: I wish you where cute when you are angry. But you're an ugly mad :(
And all this, because "literal" and "written" are infact two distinct and separate words. So much hate...
Please keep up the trolling.
I insist *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2572
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:52:00 -
[285] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat What threat? The one where I said I would kill him on sight? Why do I need backup to do that? Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise.
OK, so you promised to kill him on sight. No threat, a promise. And you need no backup. Fair enough.
According to zkilllboard, again, you have exactly ONE kill in your career, against 9 losses, and that was when you were in RvB. Once again, not exactly something that keeps people awake at night, unless you plan on going after him with an alt that has far more PvP experience. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20535
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:53:00 -
[286] - Quote
Organic Lager wrote:How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item. Because you're not paying cash for in-game items. You're paying cash for game time. You then compensate people for the time they've spend creating whatever it is you're after by giving them more time to keep doing so. You are never giving people any real money in exchange for their services.
Sure, you could quibble that by giving them time, they don't have to spend their own money but contrary to the folksy saying, a penny saved is not actually a penny earned. You are still not giving them any money.
Quote:Regardless of this reimbursing someone for time played or who gets the better deal or it was already there nonsense logic says it's usd for in game items. GǪaside from the troubling detail that your USD isn't buying you any game items.
Quote:Here is an example of pay to win. My win is to be able to plex my account each month by running level 4s;
[GǪ]
Option A takes months less time due to external money. That is the very definition of pay to win and very possible and accepted in eve. No, that is not GÇ£the very definition of pay to winGÇ¥. That is just something you've invented to let you call regular gameplay P2W by hiding the actual gameplay that goes into the process. More commonly, P2W refers to the ability to get an advantage by paying that you can't have without paying for it. No such advantage exists in EVE GÇö everything you pay for has to be available without paying for it because otherwise it wouldn't be available for you to buy.
What you're describing is trading time, not getting an advantage over other players. And the GÇ£tradingGÇ¥ part is crucial here: it is not time skipped or sped up or created out of nowhere GÇö it is time saved up over time, as it were, at a 1:1 rate. As with the items and cash you trade for you PLEX, it has to be available without paying for it because otherwise it would not be available for purchase.
And again, if all you ever can get can be had GÇö and first has to be had GÇö without paying for it, what advantage is it you think you get by paying? And what advantage do you get only if you're paying?
Quote:Purchasing an item that doesn't exist in game with real money is the issue here. GǪand aside from the NeX stuff (which has no effect on the game, which is why the community kind of allowed it) nothing of the kind exists in EVE. If something doesn't exist in-game, you can't buy it no matter how much real cash you're willing to throw at the problem.
Quote:As i stated sp = time + usd if it was just cash we would not be having this debate. On top of paying cash for your sub you need to wait time to earn the sp so it is a combo of the two. But time is cash. That's what the cash buys you, nothing more, nothing less. Alternatively, you could just look at it as all time GÇö at no point does cash make your SP tick up. So again, what you're trading is time, often at unfavourable rates.
And yes, asking CCP to lower the training time and offset it with cash is new ground GÇö they have never offered anything like it before. At most, the removal of learning skills lowered training times on average, but that was a universal and completely free change, so suddenly adding cash to the picture out of nowhere is drastically different.
By the way (since I've run out of quotes), your newbie experience was not due to a lack of fast training GÇö it was due to your lack of knowledge of the game and your mistaken decision to sit around for two months. It is exactly that lack of knowledge that makes this idea bad for new players: because they don't know what's good and bad to do early on. Your unfamiliarity would not be solved by speeding up your training; it would just increase the odds that you make more bad decisions faster. That problem is better solved by stuff like my sig than by breaking game mechanics and introducing imbalances that offer old players vast benefits compared to new players. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
5754
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:54:00 -
[287] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat What threat? The one where I said I would kill him on sight? Why do I need backup to do that? Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise. OK, so you promised to kill him on sight. No threat, a promise. And you need no backup. Fair enough. According to zkilllboard, again, you have exactly ONE kill in your career, against 9 losses, and that was when you were in RvB. Once again, not exactly something that keeps people awake at night, unless you plan on going after him with an alt that has far more PvP experience.
This just in, people in EVE only have one character!!!! News at 11. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:55:00 -
[288] - Quote
You would be able to buy the boost with PLEX though, so the cash argument fails. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 19:58:00 -
[289] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:You would be able to buy the boost with PLEX though, so the cash argument fails. Which argument? If you're going to respond to something, please note what it is you're actually responding to GÇö fill those quote tags with something other than dashes. That's what they're for. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:01:00 -
[290] - Quote
All your irrelevant and circular nonsense in your previous post.
The boost would be available to all players, equally, through PLEX.
There is no "unfairness" in it. Everyone can use them, new players and old. ------------ |
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2572
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:02:00 -
[291] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ramona's threat What threat? The one where I said I would kill him on sight? Why do I need backup to do that? Also, you may note I said it was not a threat, it was a promise. OK, so you promised to kill him on sight. No threat, a promise. And you need no backup. Fair enough. According to zkilllboard, again, you have exactly ONE kill in your career, against 9 losses, and that was when you were in RvB. Once again, not exactly something that keeps people awake at night, unless you plan on going after him with an alt that has far more PvP experience. This just in, people in EVE only have one character!!!! News at 11.
It kind of loses its cachet if an alt nails him, unless the alt then trash talks saying "I am Ramona", but why give up one of your alts.
Oh, BTW. of the 4 chars in Ramona's corp, 2 have no combat history at all, and one other has zero kills, one loss. Looks like Ramona is a low sec FW plexer, at a cursory glance.
So I guess it will have to be ANOTHER alt of Ramona's that does the deed.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3216
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:03:00 -
[292] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
According to zkilllboard, again, you have exactly ONE kill in your career, against 9 losses, and that was when you were in RvB. Once again, not exactly something that keeps people awake at night, unless you plan on going after him with an alt that has far more PvP experience.
Again, you think Im trying to scare him or worry him.
Im not.
I dont have to log anything to the KB to gank, or shoot a bomb, or do anything (provided he is a toon that undocks).
I dont have to look for him for the opportunity to present itself.
If you can think of a stronger way to say
"You are trolling, I dont like it, and I dont like you" within the game
Then please do tell me and I will do that
Otherwise, its my business how I deal with what has transpired here *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3216
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:04:00 -
[293] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
It kind of loses its cachet if an alt nails him, unless the alt then trash talks saying "I am Ramona", but why give up one of your alts.
Oh, BTW. of the 4 chars in Ramona's corp, 2 have no combat history at all, and one other has zero kills, one loss. Looks like Ramona is a low sec FW plexer, at a cursory glance.
So I guess it will have to be ANOTHER alt of Ramona's that does the deed.
Im a cyno alt and so's my corp, so what?
Doesnt mean I cant fire a bomb ffs *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:06:00 -
[294] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Panties in a Gordian Knot
Thanks for your announcement. I don't care. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:06:00 -
[295] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:All your irrelevant and circular nonsense in your previous post. What are you referring to? And how is it irrelevant and nonsensical? If you're going to respond to something, please note what it is you're actually responding to, preferably through the use of quote tags.
Quote:The boost would be available to all players, equally, through PLEX. There is no "unfairness" in it. Everyone can use them, new players and old. GǪand this is in response to, what, exactly? If you're going to respond to something, please note what it is you're actually responding to.
Without context, this just sounds like an inverted version of GÇ£if you don't like it, don't use itGÇ¥ GÇö you know, that most feeble of arguments in favour of broken gameplay (or in this case, in favour of breaking parts of the game that already work perfectly). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Organic Lager
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
30
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:07:00 -
[296] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Organic Lager wrote:How is usd -> plex -> isk not rmt? Real money to in game item. Because you're not paying cash for in-game items. You're paying cash for game time. You then compensate people for the time they've spend creating whatever it is you're after by giving them more time to keep doing so. You are never giving people any real money in exchange for their services. Sure, you could quibble that by giving them time, they don't have to spend their own money but contrary to the folksy saying, a penny saved is not actually a penny earned. You are still not giving them any money. It is impossible to turn PLEX into anything worth real money that you could then sell, and even if it was possible, selling it would not be allowed anyway. Quote:Regardless of this reimbursing someone for time played or who gets the better deal or it was already there nonsense logic says it's usd for in game items. GǪaside from the troubling detail that your USD isn't buying you any game items. Quote:Here is an example of pay to win. My win is to be able to plex my account each month by running level 4s;
[GǪ]
Option A takes months less time due to external money. That is the very definition of pay to win and very possible and accepted in eve. No, that is not GÇ£the very definition of pay to winGÇ¥. That is just something you've invented to let you call regular gameplay P2W by hiding the actual gameplay that goes into the process. More commonly, P2W refers to the ability to get an advantage by paying that you can't have without paying for it. No such advantage exists in EVE GÇö everything you pay for has to be available without paying for it because otherwise it wouldn't be available for you to buy. What you're describing is trading time, not getting an advantage over other players. And the GÇ£tradingGÇ¥ part is crucial here: it is not time skipped or sped up or created out of nowhere GÇö it is time saved up over time, as it were, at a 1:1 rate. As with the items and cash you trade for you PLEX, it has to be available without paying for it because otherwise it would not be available for purchase. And again, if all you ever can get can be had GÇö and first has to be had GÇö without paying for it, what advantage is it you think you get by paying? And what advantage do you get only if you're paying? Quote:Purchasing an item that doesn't exist in game with real money is the issue here. GǪand aside from the NeX stuff (which has no effect on the game, which is why the community kind of allowed it) nothing of the kind exists in EVE. If something doesn't exist in-game, you can't buy it no matter how much real cash you're willing to throw at the problem. .
If you're not a lawyer you should consider looking into it. Damn fine debate.
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2573
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:10:00 -
[297] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
It kind of loses its cachet if an alt nails him, unless the alt then trash talks saying "I am Ramona", but why give up one of your alts.
Oh, BTW. of the 4 chars in Ramona's corp, 2 have no combat history at all, and one other has zero kills, one loss. Looks like Ramona is a low sec FW plexer, at a cursory glance.
So I guess it will have to be ANOTHER alt of Ramona's that does the deed.
Im a cyno alt and so's my corp, so what? Doesnt mean I cant fire a bomb ffs
I look forward to the KM. Since you can't post KM's here, please email it to me.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3216
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:10:00 -
[298] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Panties in a Gordian Knot Thanks for your announcement. I don't care.
I told you I dont care if you dont care
You are a troll and that is all *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3216
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:12:00 -
[299] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I look forward to the KM. Since you can't post KM's here, please email it to me.
???
You may be waiting a while
Theres no guarantee Ill even encounter him
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:13:00 -
[300] - Quote
A 50-75% boost for a PLEX doesn't "break" anything.
It's just an alternative use for PLEX for players who choose to expend twice the amount per month on one character.
Everyone could do it. There is no unfairness inherent or implied in it.
Just means that player is using resources to replace the time element traditionally necessary for skilling.
At any boost rate below 100%, it won't break Bazaar, as training 2 toons simultaneously on one or more accounts will yield a greater net SP total in the same amount of time.
It provides an option for players, among others, who do not wish to have a wide stable of alts, to focus on development of a single character, at double the cost.
It is equitable to everyone. Nobody with older accounts is "cheated" by this, because none of the older accounts they have competed with all these years ever had this option either. Post-change, there is a new status quo, and everyone can benefit from it, equally. ------------ |
|

Divine Entervention
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
260
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:14:00 -
[301] - Quote
No
You're suppose to be irate. That's the whole point.
You're suppose to put a bounty on him and spend hours in local asking people to find him for you and bring you his corpse.
This is the EvE way.
To fit in lines with the thread topic:
Hey bro, I'll buy you a pizza if you kill that guy and give me his corpse. Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2573
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:15:00 -
[302] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
I look forward to the KM. Since you can't post KM's here, please email it to me.
??? You may be waiting a while Theres no guarantee Ill even encounter him
So I guess your comment about "see you soon" to him holds no water. As I said, don't think he, or anyone, worries to much about your KOS promises.
Just keep posting. That is what you think you are good at. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3216
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:17:00 -
[303] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
So I guess your comment about "see you soon" to him holds no water. As I said, don't think he, or anyone, worries to much about your KOS promises.
Just keep posting. That is what you think you are good at.
I said "Be seeing you"
its a reference to The Prisoner
Because this place is very very reminiscent of The Village.
Can you honestly say you cant see why anyone would lose their temper with his trolling? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:19:00 -
[304] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:A 50-75% boost for a PLEX doesn't "break" anything. GǪaside from the skilling and attribute mechanics that determine how fast everyone acquire their SP.
Quote:It's just an alternative use for PLEX for players who choose to expend twice the amount per month on one character. Why should they be allowed to ignore game mechanics just because they pay for it?
Quote:There is no unfairness inherent or implied in it. It's inherently and explicitly unfair to those who don't pay, and for no good reason.
Quote:It provides an option for players, among others, who do not wish to have a wide stable of alts, to focus on development of a single character, at double the cost. It also provides a way to make a wide stable of alts massively more efficient over a single character, more so than it already is. This is not a good thing. Also, why is such an offer needed? What problem does it solve?
Quote:Nobody with older accounts is "cheated" by this No, but it completely screws over new players for no good reason, completely contrary to the initial stated intent.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:21:00 -
[305] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Can you honestly say you cant see why anyone would lose their temper with his trolling?
I used "literal" and "writing" in the same sentence. Then you tried to claim they mean the same thing (which they don't, and are infact two distinct words).
Hardly trolling.
Come after me ingame all you want. I'm fine with that. But no need to make such a scene of it please! My wife might get jealous :( ------------ |

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:21:00 -
[306] - Quote
Holy **** guys! There's a whole plethora of other, REAL, problems and issues in this game that actually are on the To Do -list of devs. PLEX boosting won't happen, ever.
But if you really wish to play games that do indeed rely on such practices to keep servers running thanks to population disbandment, feel free to make an asking thread about it and I will list you few potential games. Gonna even throw a basic tutorial there. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17709
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:23:00 -
[307] - Quote
After reading the explosion of posts in this thread since its move to GD I'm getting the feeling that some posters feel that it's totally alright to devalue the coming on 5 years worth of SP I have spread over 2 characters by purchasing a boost to training times via PLEX.
GTFO.
Malcanis wrote:Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. The secondary corollary is that when new players propose a change, they invariably lack the experience and insight to see how the change would again be exploited by older players far more efficiently than themselves.
Older player currently roll new alts and train them more efficiently than new players do, because we have knowledge of what skills are actually needed to accomplish a task. For a newbie it's pay to lose, they gain nothing, for a vet it's pay to do something that they're already doing, albeit at a faster speed.
SP does not equal success, game knowledge and experience will urinate over SP 99% of the time, doesn't matter if its industry, trade, mining, missioning or PvP.
|

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
564
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:26:00 -
[308] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:[ Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll Seemed to bother you enough to place him on your offical troll KOS list. For what its worth. |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:26:00 -
[309] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪaside from the skilling and attribute mechanics that determine how fast everyone acquire their SP.
Precedent already exists as implants, neural re-maps and SP accelerators. All of which modify SP accumalation. Furthermore, it is already possible to leverage PLEX to the Bazaar, and obtain characters from others, thereby completely bypassing your own need to "aquire SP".
Tippia wrote:Why should they be allowed to ignore game mechanics just because they pay for it?
Why don't you go ask Character Bazaar buyers and salesmen that?
Tippia wrote:t's inherently and explicitly unfair to those who don't pay, and for no good reason.
False. Its no more unfair to "those who don't pay" than are people who buy PLEX from CCP. Or those who buy characters on Bazaar.
Tippia wrote:]It also provides a way to make a wide stable of alts massively more efficient over a single character, more so than it already is. This is not a good thing. Also, why is such an offer needed? What problem does it solve?
Yes it does. But at enormous cost. The service could conceivably also be limited to 1 active boost per account. Why is such an offer needed? I've already answered that earlier. What problem does it solve? I've already answered that earlier as well.
Tippia wrote:]No, but it completely screws over new players for no good reason, completely contrary to the initial stated intent.
Doesn't screw new players at all. Its equally fair to all players. ------------ |

Salvos Rhoska
1020
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:29:00 -
[310] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:some posters feel that it's totally alright to devalue the coming on 5 years worth of SP I have spread over 2 characters by purchasing a boost to training times via PLEX.
Doesn't devalue them at all. You still have that full SP total. You still paid the same price for that, as you would have after the change.
Anyone attempting to reach the same total SP as you have through boosting would have to spend an enormous amount of PLEX to do so. Far more than you ever did. ------------ |
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2574
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:32:00 -
[311] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
So I guess your comment about "see you soon" to him holds no water. As I said, don't think he, or anyone, worries to much about your KOS promises.
Just keep posting. That is what you think you are good at.
I said "Be seeing you" its a reference to The Prisoner Because this place is very very reminiscent of The Village. Can you honestly say you cant see why anyone would lose their temper with his trolling?
I lose my temper all the time with trolls. But I have learned to avoid getting wrapped up in their screwy mind games. Why do you see me so seldom rise to Tippia's bait trolls?
I post a ton, trying to defend the high sec and casual player's (most time, the same thing) playstyle against the null sec cartels' control of game design. I get furious with them, because it is a losing battle.
But I don't promise to "get" anyone in-game, because it is so unlikely to happen, and I can't be bothered to blow up a ship trying to suicide gank someone, because I hate that playstyle, and also hate wasting ISK.
So your best bet is to ignore someone you consider a troll, or battle with them on the forums. But don't make "promises" about someone being KOS, when you have pretty much zero chance of following through. Especially against an NPC corp player, since you have zero clue if it is a main that undocks, ever.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17710
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:33:00 -
[312] - Quote
I see someone linked the Serenity KB of Much Crying Old Experts, the forums borked the links as per usual, I've relisted them, copy and paste if you want a look.
http://killboard.nl/en/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=3 << The main KB http://killboard.nl/en/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=29803 << The Thanny that died to 18 frigates because the frig pilots knew exactly what they were doing.
ISD Folks ~ If Serenity KB links are forbidden please remove this post.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3218
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:33:00 -
[313] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:[ Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll Seemed to bother you enough to place him on your offical troll KOS list. For what its worth.
Your right
I cant argue with that, and I shouldnt have said it in all honesty
I cant apologise to Salvos, because he keeps jabbing me for a reaction. I dont feel I should.
But I DO owe everyone else in this thread an apology for derailing and going off the deep end.
Yes, even Dino. I dont understand where he gets his ideas most of the time, but goshdarnit, he sticks to his guns and props to him for it.
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17710
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:34:00 -
[314] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:some posters feel that it's totally alright to devalue the coming on 5 years worth of SP I have spread over 2 characters by purchasing a boost to training times via PLEX. Doesn't devalue them at all. You still have that full SP total. You still paid the same price for that, as you would have after the change. Anyone attempting to reach the same total SP as you have through boosting would have to spend an enormous amount of PLEX to do so. Far more than you ever did. Yes it does, it devalues the 4+ years of time I've piled into those SP, my time is infinitely more valuable than the cost.
|

Jallukola
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:36:00 -
[315] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: False. Its no more unfair to "those who don't pay" than are people who buy PLEX from CCP.
Even if there would be your petty PLEX boosting in place, not everyone even play that actively to work the ISK for a PLEX, hence why a large portion does indeed pay with subscription.
And then what? You gonna say "too bad"? No, it doesen't go like that. Despite the game gets a bit streamlined and opens itself for new players seeking for new games, the game has to remain equal to everyone within its boundaries, see my page 11 post.
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Doesn't screw new players at all. Its equally fair to all players.
Maybe not, but it does help to screw the economy, which Everyone are a part of.
|

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
567
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:39:00 -
[316] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
So I guess your comment about "see you soon" to him holds no water. As I said, don't think he, or anyone, worries to much about your KOS promises.
Just keep posting. That is what you think you are good at.
I said "Be seeing you" its a reference to The Prisoner Because this place is very very reminiscent of The Village. Can you honestly say you cant see why anyone would lose their temper with his trolling? I find it funny when the troll thinks they are being trolled. |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
567
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:42:00 -
[317] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:[ Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll Seemed to bother you enough to place him on your offical troll KOS list. For what its worth. Your right I cant argue with that, and I shouldnt have said it in all honesty I cant apologise to Salvos, because he keeps jabbing me for a reaction. I dont feel I should. But I DO owe everyone else in this thread an apology for derailing and going off the deep end. Yes, even Dino. I dont understand where he gets his ideas most of the time, but goshdarnit, he sticks to his guns and props to him for it. If you feel you should appologize then do so. You would gain much respect from your piers. |

E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
567
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:44:00 -
[318] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:[ Its up to you whether you choose to believe me or not, when I say I included them BOTH, deliberately. And as above, its up to you to get extremely panty-mad about it too and make empty EVE threats all you like :D This is not something that bothers me if you care about it or not, Troll Seemed to bother you enough to place him on your offical troll KOS list. For what its worth. Your right I cant argue with that, and I shouldnt have said it in all honesty I cant apologise to Salvos, because he keeps jabbing me for a reaction. I dont feel I should. But I DO owe everyone else in this thread an apology for derailing and going off the deep end. Yes, even Dino. I dont understand where he gets his ideas most of the time, but goshdarnit, he sticks to his guns and props to him for it. Apology accepted...... o7 |

Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
7429
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:45:00 -
[319] - Quote
................
I like Soup. Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:45:00 -
[320] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Precedent already exists as implants, neural re-maps and SP accelerators. All of which modify SP accumalation. Furthermore, it is already possible to leverage PLEX to the Bazaar GǪand none of the break the mechanics that determine how fast the acquisition of SP happens and the overall balance created.
Quote:Why don't you go ask Character Bazaar buyers and salesmen that? Why would I ask them when they're not ignoring any game mechanics, and when, in fact, their entire business relies on the mechanics being impossible to ignore?
Tippia wrote:False. Its no more unfair to "those who don't pay" than are people who buy PLEX from CCP. Or those who buy characters on Bazaar. You mean aside from the fact that neither of those provide any benefit that can't be had without paying for it? So no, it's not false. The entire notion relies on it being inherently and explicitly unfair in favour of those who pay GÇö otherwise there would be no point in adding it.
Quote:Yes it does. But at enormous cost. The service could conceivably also be limited to 1 active boost per account. Why is such an offer needed? I've already answered that earlier. What problem does it solve? I've already answered that earlier as well. Cost has repeatedly proven to not be a restricting or balancing factor. And yes, you've answered the questions by saying that it isn't necessary and that it doesn't solve any kind of problem. Therefore, there is no reason to add it to the game to begin with, even before we take into account the nasty downsides of doing so. But here's the thing: you keep suggesting that it should be added, and that just (re)raises the question: why? If it is unnecessary and pointless, why should it be added?
Quote:Doesn't screw new players at all. GǪaside from making them significantly fall behind older players, which is the exact opposite of the original intent. Again, if you want training to be faster, why not ask CCP to make training faster? Is that not the best way to make it equal and equitable for all? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|

Yarda Black
Epidemic. Nulli Secunda
111
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:46:00 -
[321] - Quote
If this is about buying skillpoints with PLEX:
Buying/starting, upgrading and selling characters for ISK is a mini-profession for some EVE players.
They train, you guessed it, properly.
You can buy any kind of character with ISK or real cash you want.
It works way better because not only CCP benefits with cash.
Nobody really minds because skillpoints only provide options, not outcomes.
We PLAY for the outcome.
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Council of Peace and Prosperity
3219
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:46:00 -
[322] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Apology accepted...... o7
And so as there is no illusion, the apology holds for everyone in this thread who had to listen to my and Salvos bickering.
It demeans us all to fall to this level, and for that I am truly sorry.
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Despite others being missing, at least Ramona is back." - Scipio Artelius |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:47:00 -
[323] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Yes it does, it devalues the 4+ years of time I've piled into those SP, my time is infinitely more valuable than the cost.
Thats an imaginary distinction. The "time" you put in, is worth, and I hate to tell you this, but absolutely ZERO, as far as SP is concerned.
You didn't "pile" any time into them. Time continues at the same rate, for everyone, everywhere on this planet, constantly.
You could just as well have never even once undocked in them, and only logged into to queue skills, for that entire 4 years, and the result would have been exactly the same in terms of SP.
Conside these example numbers, if the boost was 50% and a year of training was 1mil SP:
A: 1yr 12 PLEX 1,000,000 SP
B: 1yr 24 PLEX 1,500,000 SP
So for double the PLEX cost, that was 6months advantage.
For your 2 accounts over 4 years: A: 4yrs 2 accounts 96 PLEX 4,000,000 SP
B: 4yrs 2 accounts 192 PLEX 6,000,000 SP
A costs: 1920e B costs: 3840e
So 50% advantage in SP, but at DOUBLE the cost.
If someone is prepared to invest double what someone else is into their training, I don't think a 50% advantage is unreasonable. It just becomes one among many other options for what to do with PLEX in terms of training.
As is already explained at length in this thread, it is already possible to buy characters such as yours on the Bazaar for substantially less PLEX than it would take to train it up in the first place. And that people can and do buy those all the time with RL money bought PLEX, that is then sold ingame to aquire the ISK to purchase a 4yr toon such as yours.
The above is therefore already happening, but in an indirect format. ------------ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:51:00 -
[324] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Time continues at the same rate, for everyone, everywhere on this planet, constantly. GǪand that is exactly why it's a horribly bad idea to allow it to be worth different amounts depending on whether you pay for it or not.
Quote:The "time" you put in, is worth, and I hate to tell you this, but absolutely ZERO, as far as SP is concerned. That would mean that a 50% boost should be worth zero extra SP. Under those conditions, I could agree with people paying more for the GÇ£benefitGÇ¥. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
1797
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:54:00 -
[325] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:A strange topic title and I've rapidly changed my opinions on these things over the past few years, but i'll explain where i'm coming from.
I have a good friend who loves the idea of Eve, has played it and is intelligent enough to grasp the concepts of it and work within the structures it has in place. He see's Fleet fights on Youtube and reports of massive scams and schemes and he loves it. He's not alone, I have multiple friends who are like this. The one i am talking about in particular has Subbed a few times and every time after a month or 2 has come back with the same feedback: It takes too long to get into properly fitted ships.
I used to ignore this, but it's becoming unavoidable - The new player-> veteran gulf is big and boosts for new players only goes so far. So my question is this:
Should people be able to accelerate skill training as a micro transaction?
Without going into too much detail, it seems like it might be worth seriously considering. Becoming GOOD at eve takes time, but that is also relative. If you play every day for 10 hours you WILL get better... only to be hindered by the arbitrary number that is 'Skill points'.
I've been playing since 2006'ish and I want to see a new influx of players or a way for newer players to accelerate themselfs to keep interest in the game. I've spent years training skills and it doesn't feel like an accomplishment. All i had to do was auto renew a subscription. What i've DONE in Eve feels like an accomplishment.
Perhaps offering 1 months subscription cost for 1 months worth of skillpoints (based on char stats) into your unassigned pool would be a possible way to ensure that old players got the same number of SP for every penny/cent they spent as a new player does. None of this makes new players better at the game or more financially sound... just gives them access to more ships/bonuses/market-opportunities.
wow you are a bad friend for not showing your friends the character bazzar. that and plex is all the pay to win you need. There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:55:00 -
[326] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Time continues at the same rate, for everyone, everywhere on this planet, constantly. GǪand that is exactly why it's a horribly bad idea to allow it to be worth different amounts depending on whether you pay for it or not. [/quote]
I seem to remember you yourself saying that time is money?
Tippia wrote:That would mean that a 50% boost should be worth zero extra SP. Under those conditions, I could agree with people paying more for the GÇ£benefitGÇ¥. Wat?
The person would be paying double what you are, to get the same SP 50% faster. Whereas you can yourself simply train normally, get there 50% slower, but not have to pay even one cent additional.
Its equitable to those who have the means to do so. But everyone has the equal option to do so. Instead of investing the PLEX into a parallel alt, or a second account, simply use it to improve your main toon. Its a choice, just like any other, and doesn't "break" anything. ------------ |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:57:00 -
[327] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Yes it does, it devalues the 4+ years of time I've piled into those SP, my time is infinitely more valuable than the cost. Thats an imaginary distinction. The "time" you put in, is worth, and I hate to tell you this, but absolutely ZERO, as far as SP is concerned. Since when is time worthless, if I hadn't spent 4+ years training my two characters then I wouldn't have any SP. Zero time spent = zero SP.
Quote:You didn't "pile" any time into them. Time continues at the same rate, for everyone, everywhere on this planet, constantly. Agreed and you're proposing to effectively speed up that time with what is effectively SP4PLEX, thus rendering what you said in this particular part of your post invalid.
Quote:You could just as well have never even once undocked in them, and only logged into to queue skills, for that entire 4 years, and the result would have been exactly the same in terms of SP. Yes I could have, and that SP would be worthless without the knowledge to use it effectively, I would have wasted 4+ years in the pursuit of some arbitrary number, but that's not the point.
SP4PLEX or training speed boosts devalues my, and everybody elses, time. My time has value as far as I'm concerned, both in Eve and in the real world.
Whether or not you consider time to be of any value is not my problem. Please feel free to go and work a 40 hour week for nothing if you feel that your time has no value.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 20:59:00 -
[328] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Whether or not you consider time to be of any value is not my problem. Please feel free to go and work a 40 hour week for nothing if you feel that your time has no value.
If time has value, then so be it.
For double the cost, you can spend 50% less of it.
Thanks for confirming my position on this. ------------ |

Desivo Delta Visseroff
Cataclysmic Paradox
201
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:03:00 -
[329] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Conside these example numbers, if the boost was 50% and a year of training was 1mil SP:
A: 1yr 12 PLEX 1,000,000 SP
B: 1yr 24 PLEX 1,500,000 SP
..........................................
A costs: 1920e B costs: 3840e
So 50% advantage in SP, but at DOUBLE the cost.
If I'm following your example, you are proposing that someone is given the option to spend $1,900 USD for the benefit of 1 million SP............. This is a troll right? I mean, if someone is soooo desperate to spend closing to two grand for @ half a month's worth of training!?!?!?!?!....... Well....Let's have at it.
Sometimes the best way to educate a rich person is to take all their money. So CCP, go ahead and implement this policy. Call it the 1Mill2K Platinum Package.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:05:00 -
[330] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:I seem to remember you yourself saying that time is money? No, I said that subscription time is created by money. And that fact doesn't particularly have any bearing on what a bad idea it is to let one person's time be worth more or less than someone else's.
If time put into a character is worth absolutely zero, as far as SP is concerned, then boosting how much your time is worth by 50% through the application of a PLEX would be worth zero. 0+ù1.5=0, don't'cha'know. If that's the kind of boost you're suggesting, then I'm all for it. Seems like a bit of a waste of developer time thoughGǪ
Quote:Its equitable to those who have the means to do so. But everyone has the equal option to do so. No, they don't. That's why it's not an equal or equitable solution compared to, say, just increasing the training speed and subscription costs for everyone. So, again, if you want training to be faster, just ask CCP to make training faster. Don't invent this idiotic payment scheme that breaks and unbalances a core component of the game.
Quote:Instead of investing the PLEX into a parallel alt, or a second account, simply use it to improve your main toon. Its a choice, just like any other, and doesn't "break" anything. GǪaside from the mechanics that determine how fast you can progress your character, and the balance and character ecology this creates. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:08:00 -
[331] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Whether or not you consider time to be of any value is not my problem. Please feel free to go and work a 40 hour week for nothing if you feel that your time has no value.
If time has value, then so be it. For double the cost, you can spend 50% less of it. Thanks for confirming my position on this. I wasn't denying your position, I'm just saying that it's wrong. Paying for a training time boost is a crappy and lazy way of doing things, and as I said earlier, devalues everybody elses time that they've already put into the game.
I'll put it this way, assume that you, Salvos Rhoska, had spent 20 years working your way up a corporate ladder from the bottom, gathering skills and experience along the way, you get yourself a nice cushy well paid little number because of it. Then some 18 year old upstart works his way up the same ladder in a vastly reduced time and ends up in a equally or better paid position, not because he's any better qualified or brighter than than you, but because his daddy bought him his way in, how pissed would you be?
|

Desivo Delta Visseroff
Cataclysmic Paradox
202
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:10:00 -
[332] - Quote
RL Human being live one life over the course of a finite amount of time, which moves in one constant direction... Ergo, Time has Value. |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:15:00 -
[333] - Quote
Desivo Delta Visseroff wrote:If I'm following your example, you are proposing that someone is given the option to spend $1,900 USD for the benefit of 1 million SP............. This is a troll right? I mean, if someone is soooo desperate to spend closing to two grand for @ half a month's worth of training!?!?!?!?!....... Well....Let's have at it.
Sometimes the best way to educate a rich person is to take all their money. So CCP, go ahead and implement this policy. Call it the 1Mill2K Platinum Package.
No, you got your numbers wrong. 50% faster, for double the cost. So: 24 PLEX per year, for 18 months worth training. vs 12 PLEX per year, 12 months worth training.
But I think the reality of it is its something only very few people will choose as an option for extended periods of time. I mean its already kind of funny when you look at the massive PLEX packages boldly onsale on CCPs site.
Mostly Id think its people who really really want that one skill that brings their build together, and are prepared to spend an additional PLEX for one or a few months so that they can get to where they feel they are "enjoying" the game again.
The change wouldn't really affect anyone elses game. I mean it makes next to zero difference to me if a couple of guys in my constellation are skilling 50% faster than me, and pumping in twice the PLEX to do so. SP are important, but they arent THAT important. 50% boost for them over a short period isn't going to somehow make me redundant or chopped liver in comparison.
Its just one more option for PLEX use, especially for players who would prefer a game strategy of developing one character, rather than a wide stable of alts. Furthermore its a good PLEX sink, and a CCP cash faucet.
Its really not a big deal, though I do understand the sentimental notions of some Vets regarding how many years they have played. But anyone boosting would actually be funding the game at twice the rate those Vets ever did. Its equitable for everyone. ------------ |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:23:00 -
[334] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I'll put it this way, assume that you, Salvos Rhoska, had spent 20 years working your way up a corporate ladder from the bottom, gathering skills and experience along the way, you get yourself a nice cushy well paid little number because of it. Then some 18 year old upstart works his way up the same ladder in a vastly reduced time and ends up in a equally or better paid position, not because he's any better qualified or brighter than than you, but because his daddy bought him his way in, how pissed would you be?
Are you saying you are pissed your daddy doesn't pay your gametime? :D *cough*
But let's be serious here.
Nobody had the option before, after the change, everyone has the option. You can then throw all the money you didn't spend back then, into it afterwards, if you wish.
Its still an equal sandbox. Just with an additional option. You can still continue to play at the same rate as before, without daddy having to pay. ------------ |

Nalelmir Ahashion
Omen Industries -Entropy-
263
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:33:00 -
[335] - Quote
you are not looking for pay to win you are looking for simple guides to show ppl how to fit ships in different ranks of skills.
There is some sick sense of accomplishment improving your fit and skills and see your stats growing as days passes. "What's worse than a foul-mouthed eight-year-old constantly claiming he's had relations with your mother? A foul-mouthed eight-year-old constantly claiming he's had relations with your mother who thinks he's a gangser, that's what." --áAaron Birch |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:37:00 -
[336] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Nobody had the option before, after the change, everyone has the option. You can then throw all the money you didn't spend back then, into it afterwards, if you wish.
Its still an equal sandbox. Just with an additional option.
You can still continue to play at the same rate as before, without daddy having to pay, or, if you wish, use your existing pool of PLEX in a different fashion than before. Instead of training your alt on that account for a month, instead put it into boosting your main for a month, for example.
There is nothing "lazy" about it, because it commensurately doubles your costs.
Anyways, all of this is academic. This is just a random thread thrown up for discussion. Not like CCP have announced any even cursory intent to do anything as outlined here. (Though personally, I think its inevitable)
How does paying CCP for an advantage create an equal sandbox?
Plex for Aur to buy vanity items is fine, it has no effect on the sandbox other than cosmetics, plex for multiple character training likewise; as both characters train at the same rate as one belonging to a player who doesn't use it, it is merely an alternative to having 2 accounts. No advantage is gained at the expense of another player.
Any attempts by CCP to offer advantages for cash will not go down well with the community at large, even theoretical discussion of it as with the Greed is Good leak of 2011 causes great discomfort amongst Eve players in general.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20536
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:39:00 -
[337] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Its still an equal sandbox. Just with an additional option. No. The mere fact that some characters are subject to different rules than others inherently makes it unequal. The fact that this inequality is tied to cash-based assets only serves to extend the inequality to a meta-gaming level as well.
Quote:There is nothing "lazy" about it, because it commensurately doubles your costs. It's incredibly lazy because it fails to take into account numerous details about proper game balancing, player behaviour, and real-world constraints, and just screams of a GÇ£wohoo, let's extract the cash and runGÇ¥ mentality. All that wile being unnecessary, solving nothing, and creating a swath of problems. It's also lazy because it lets you skip over mechanics you don't like.
It invents a problem just to monetise its thoroughly flawed solution. Design doesn't get any lazier than that, and exploiting broken mechanics is about as lazy as playing a game gets. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
608
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:44:00 -
[338] - Quote
Salvos, I get that you enjoy the forum pvp, that's fine, but this is a stupid one dude.
Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1336
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:49:00 -
[339] - Quote
Logic flaw: If buying a character is the same as buying SP, why do some of you so desperately wish to buy SP?
Seeing as the chief argument for such a change is "it's literally the same thing as buying a character," why don't you lot quit your whining and buy a character?
Also, this thread is terrible. |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:53:00 -
[340] - Quote
As I said, kneejerk reactions.
And yet activity which amounts to the same relative result (with lack of control over character name and history) is happening in Bazaar everyday.
It will happen, sooner or later. And though I understand, really I do, why you resist it, you are actually making all the wrong arguments. I understand WHY you make them, but I also understand why they arent actually relevant.
Ill return to the topic when CCP eventually and invariably, suggests something similar, and can discuss it with you then. Its just a matter of time (no pun intended to topic). ------------ |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:56:00 -
[341] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:As I said, kneejerk reactions.
And yet activity which amounts to the same relative result (with lack of control over character name and history) is happening in Bazaar everyday.
It will happen, sooner or later. And though I understand, really I do, why you resist it, you are actually making all the wrong arguments. I understand WHY you make them, but I also understand why they arent actually relevant.
Ill return to the topic when CCP eventually and invariably, suggests something similar, and can discuss it with you then. Its just a matter of time (no pun intended to topic). Nope, it won't, because CCP have already seen what happens when they try to do things similar to what you suggest. They're not dumb enough to crap all over their players in that manner again.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20537
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 21:58:00 -
[342] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:As I said, kneejerk reactions. If by GÇ£kneejerkGÇ¥ you mean GÇ£extensively discussed and hashed-through reactions with all the angles coveredGÇ¥, then yes.
That is unless you're referring to the uninspired and poorly though-through idea that introducing training booster would somehow help new players GÇ£catch upGÇ¥ with older ones GÇö a kneejerk reaction to a perceived problem that, on closer inspection, doesn't actually exist in the game.
Quote:And yet activity which amounts to the same relative result (with lack of control over character name and history) is happening in Bazaar everyday. Not really, no. The bazaar does not make time run faster for some than for others, and definitely does not make payments in any way affect the progression of characters.
Quote:It will happen, sooner or later. Why would it? CCP already accidentally suggested something slightly similar, but much more limited, and were slapped in the face hard until they got the point that it would break the game and make them lose more money than they ever could hope to gain from it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:00:00 -
[343] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:]Nope, it won't, because CCP have already seen what happens when they try to do things similar to what you suggest. They're not dumb enough to crap all over their players in that manner again.
Then explain the starter pack accelerators.
Jonah, its inevitable. Sooner or later, SP accumalation will be ramped up to increase player retention. Or do you really think new players will enter the game against 20yr vets?
@Tippia: Ill see you when it happens :) Thread saved in my archive for that day. ------------ |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1336
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:03:00 -
[344] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Then explain the starter pack accelerators. It's much easier to reel in a fish once it's hooked. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:11:00 -
[345] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nope, it won't, because CCP have already seen what happens when they try to do things similar to what you suggest. They're not dumb enough to crap all over their players in that manner again. Then explain the starter pack accelerators. An incentive for new accounts, they are only usable on new accounts, completely cease to function after 35 days, offer a very limited boost, and don't cost a plex.
Quote:Jonah, its inevitable. Sooner or later, SP accumalation will be ramped up to increase player retention. Or do you really think new players will enter the game against 20yr vets? They're still entering the game when there are 10+ year vets, so yes I think that they will.
Player retention is important, luckily most of it happens because people get Eve, not because CCP fundamentally changes the game to encourage it.
|

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
608
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:15:00 -
[346] - Quote
In case ccp are actually reading this:, it's a **** idea. I'd leave in a heartbeat if something like this is introduced. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼ -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-áIf In Doubt....Do....Excessively. Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼a«£¦¬¦P¦¬a«£Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼Gû¼
|

Ms Kat
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
65
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:16:00 -
[347] - Quote
There will be a day when CCP will milk this game for all the money it can make, they will sell sp, they will do many of the things people rage about. Wether the game will still be relevant or not is in question. Every game has a life cycle, and eve although doing well relies a lot on alts, and alts of alts, which really is not a good foundation to base all your marketing on (power of 2) (buddy invites) (return a friend) all aimed at alts |

Ms Kat
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
65
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:17:00 -
[348] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:In case ccp are actually reading this:, it's a **** idea. I'd leave in a heartbeat if something like this is introduced.
Stuff can I have?
You wont last a month without eve you will be back  |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:17:00 -
[349] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:In case ccp are actually reading this:, it's a **** idea. I'd leave in a heartbeat if something like this is introduced. Ditto, if I wanted to play a P2W game I would. I still haven't resubbed 2 accounts that I unsubbed over the Incarna mess, and probably never will.
|

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:18:00 -
[350] - Quote
When I said explain the accelerators, I didnt mean what they are. Sorry, I was unclear. I meant as a SP multiplying purchaseable element that does everything you are so against it doing.
As to P2W, its not really valid to say that a guy who spent two months away from EVE while his toons trained at conventional rate is somehow losing out to a guy who alterrnsatively spent those same two months away from EVE getting more SP cos he invested more resources. Its the same amount of time, but one guy invested more PLEX than the other. Its not really anymore P2W than that.
Anyways, you say they wont. I say they will. Only time can tell who is right on this one. ------------ |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20538
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:18:00 -
[351] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Then explain the starter pack accelerators. You mean the ones that don't arbitrarily alter the game mechanics just because you pay for it; which are of very limited use; which are better used by new players as a trade item than as a training item (to let old players benefit from them); and which provide a very minute boost?
They are quite easily explained by the fact that they do almost nothing of what this silly proposal does.
Quote:Or do you really think new players will enter the game against 20yr vets? Why not? They're not at any particular disadvantage compared to if they went up against 2GÇô3 year vets. If it was to happen for that reason, it would have happened in 2006. It didn't happen then or in 2010.
Quote:Ill see you when it happens You're four years late to the party. It has already happened. It already didn't play out the way you think it would. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17711
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:24:00 -
[352] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:When I said explain the accelerators, I didnt mean what they are. Sorry, I was unclear. I meant as a SP multiplying purchaseable element that does everything you are so against it doing.
Anyways, you say they wont. I say they will. Only time can tell who is right on this one. Which bit about them being only applicable to new characters and extremely time limited did you miss? Those 2 things make them very very different from what you propose. They aren't directly purchasable outside of the game, you can't arbitrarily give CCP cash and receive one, you have to purchase them as part of a starter pack, or in game via the market.
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5113
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:24:00 -
[353] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Sooner or later, SP accumalation will be ramped up to increase player retention. Or do you really think new players will enter the game against 20yr vets?
I'll say this. There has been a ton of ideas over the years that people have stuck their fingers in their ears or buried their heads in the sand because 'that'll never happen, you doofus'. Know what, though? They happened.
I believe SP for ISK or PLEX or your first born is not outside the realm of possibility at all. Why not have an open discussion now as opposed a bunch of butt hurt mega-threads later? I understand that name calling and clever put downs is the standard response in this type of thread, but how has that worked out historically?
Think-tank it.
Assume it will happen and come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached. Better than having no input after it's already implemented, right?
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Salvos Rhoska
1021
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:25:00 -
[354] - Quote
Still misusing the term "game mechanics" and recycling the same retired, irrelevant rhetoric which has already been rebutted.
Whatever Tippia. You know already what I think of you and your opinions.
Time will tell, and I will laugh when you are invariably shown to be wrong, as you always are. ------------ |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1337
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:28:00 -
[355] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote: Assume it will happen and come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached.
That is the single worst argument I've seen on these boards in a looooong while.
On the other hand: Assuming hisec will be removed, let's come to some consensus on how that should best be approached.  |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20539
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:32:00 -
[356] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Still misusing the term "game mechanics" and recycling the same retired, irrelevant rhetoric which has already been rebutted. Not really, no. Just because you couldn't come up with and articulate a counter-argument doesn't mean any of what I've said is irrelevant, rhetorics, or rebutted. Nor does it mean I'm misusing any of the terms involved. All it means is that all you have to offer is baseless claims and fallacies.
Quote:You know already what I think of you and your opinions. Impeccable, presumably, since you have to adopt all these evasion strategies to try to at least give the appearance of actually presenting something that could be confused with a proper argument.
Quote:Time will tell, and I will laugh when you are invariably shown to be wrong, as you always are. Again, you're four years late to the party. I was right as I always am before you even failed to present an argument, courtesy of CCP's decision on the matter. History has already proven you wrong. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5114
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:33:00 -
[357] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Mr Epeen wrote: Assume it will happen and come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached.
That is the single worst argument I've seen on these boards in a looooong while. On the other hand: Assuming hisec will be removed, let's come to com some consensus on how that should be best approached. 
Assuming the world will end in a blaze of asteroidal fire is stupid as well. But think tanks are working out the logistics for it. That's what they are for. Solutions to unlikely possibilities. Next time don't misquote. Just makes you look dumb.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Divine Entervention
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
262
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:38:00 -
[358] - Quote
How can getting skill points faster be considered "pay to win"?
Veterans tell new players that skill points don't really matter. They'll claim that since people have their skill points spread out in different areas, they'll be deficient in some. Meaning that a new player can potentially beat a veteran if they have their skill points in the right spots.
So which is it? Do skill points equal winning or not? If skill points isn't "winning", then getting skill points faster isn't "pay to win". If skill points is "winning", then how is a new player expected to want to partake in an environment where he's not allowed to "win" for years? Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
20539
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:41:00 -
[359] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:How can getting skill points faster be considered "pay to win"? Because you're paying to not be affected by the same game-mechanical limits everyone else has to abide by.
The skill point part is purely incidental; it's getting them faster than through regular gameplay that is the problem. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1337
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:45:00 -
[360] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Mr Epeen wrote: Assume it will happen and come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached.
That is the single worst argument I've seen on these boards in a looooong while. On the other hand: Assuming hisec will be removed, let's come to com some consensus on how that should be best approached.  Assuming the world will end in a blaze of asteroidal fire is stupid as well. But think tanks are working out the logistics for it. That's what they are for. Poor analogy. Asteroids are a natural phenomenon outside of human control. The topic at hand isn't. A better anaology would be:
Assume a flat tax will happen, lets come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached.
The difference between the asteroid example and the flat tax example is that one is a natural phenomenon that is inherently uncontrollable and the other is a policy change (like "Pay to win") that is very much in someone's control.
Further, that frame of discussion encourages that particular policy in the public mind. You change the tone of the discussion from "Should we do X" to "How should we do X" implying that X will be done regardless. It is a manipulative tactic used by shills and demagogues on all sides of the media, and people should always be called out for it.
Mr Epeen wrote: Solutions to unlikely possibilities. Next time don't misquote. Just makes you look dumb. Mr Epeen  I quoted you verbatim using the "quote" function. By definition, that isn't a misquote. Nice try though. |
|

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5114
|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:49:00 -
[361] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Mr Epeen wrote: Assume it will happen and come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached.
That is the single worst argument I've seen on these boards in a looooong while. On the other hand: Assuming hisec will be removed, let's come to com some consensus on how that should be best approached.  Assuming the world will end in a blaze of asteroidal fire is stupid as well. But think tanks are working out the logistics for it. That's what they are for. Poor analogy. Asteroids are a natural phenomenon outside of human control. The topic at hand isn't. A better anaology would be: Assume a flat tax will happen, lets come to some consensus as to how it should best be approached. The difference between the asteroid example and the flat tax example is that one is a natural phenomenon that is inherently uncontrollable and the other is a policy change (like "Pay to win") that is very much in someone's control. Further, that frame of discussion encourages that particular policy in the public mind. You change the tone of the discussion from "Should we do X" to "How should we do X" implying that X will be done regardless. It is a manipulative tactic used by shills and demagogues on all sides of the media, and people should always be called out for it.
Mr Epeen wrote: Solutions to unlikely possibilities. Next time don't misquote. Just makes you look dumb. Mr Epeen  I quoted you verbatim using the "quote" function. By definition, that isn't a misquote. Nice try though.
LOL!
In one of your moods again, I see. Good luck with that.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1115

|
Posted - 2014.04.07 22:50:00 -
[362] - Quote
topic temp locked for some cleaning. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: [one page] |