Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11479
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 08:45:00 -
[61] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:baltec1 wrote: That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar.
Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr
High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions.
Run anoms with the bling ships used in high sec, profit. You try to back this argument up every time by comparing apples & oranges. 'We use a cheap T2 Cruiser that doesn't make as much as a 10 billion isk battleship, so something is wrong'. Also incursions support no more than 80 people with 100 mil/hr (Assuming 23/day like one can rat, and we all know ratting bots do exist, heck, Bots were capable of handling the old probe interface, let alone the new one, they certainly can rat). if you want to take a higher benchmark citing perfect TCRC walls & perfect pirate fleets all with officer bling that number of people supported drops to about 40. Across ALL OF EVE! Including those Null sec incursions that get run to clear cyno jam effects. So, lets stop pretending Incursions are actually significant when talking about income.
90 mil/hr is the most you will get out of anoms with a bling boat. High sec missions beats that, hence why when we tell GSF pilots how to make isk for cap ships most of the advice is to take advantage of high sec. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10751
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 08:58:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jaun Pacht-Feng wrote:Combatting Nullsec Ratting bots would go against Alliance leaderships RMT quotas each month.
I'd suggest getting into a Nullsec Bloc, and moving up the ranks to leadership level...as Alliance leaders/lackys are the only ones allowed to Bot in their space under a alt botting corp so their main Alliance get's left alone by a new Dev.
Then you collect as much evidence as you possibly can, then you go public about it, posting it anywhere in the EVE-O forums would get a swift lock...then deleted thread, with a account wide ban for you.
i don't think i want whatever you're smoking
tell us more about these things that you are apparently so well-informed of Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |
Jered Hakaaros
GeoCorp. Curatores Veritatis Alliance
25
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 11:51:00 -
[63] - Quote
I agree with most comments here. Im doing a lot of frequent trips through Fountain, Querious, Delve, Period Basis and the rest of the west. What you see are
- afk ratters - multiboxing bling ships and - ratting caps
All of which are perfectly fine game mechanics, for the last two you even have to invest a shitload of ISK beforehand. Mostly they are there only at odd hours, which is a perfectly good place and time to make ISK in quiet null systems. Never have I seen anything that looks remotely like bot ratting.
Sure, you can argue if you write them in local, they dont answer. But that doesnt make them bots. Answering someone in local, no matter what you write, means giving the other person precious intel. And lets not forget, there are also many solo players who just dont talk, like, ever. |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
620
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:13:00 -
[64] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:General Nusense wrote:This "proof" is a load of ****. If you are only making 69 mil isk per hour ratting anoms in nullsec, you either 1) suck or 2) dont know how to rat. Please have someone with "skills" and knows how to "iskperhour" do it. Then go to Highsec and run LVL 4 missions and compare the two. Your "proof" will be a joke, like everyone knows it is. That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar. Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions.
Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODEL
BONJOUR |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11484
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:16:00 -
[65] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:baltec1 wrote:General Nusense wrote:This "proof" is a load of ****. If you are only making 69 mil isk per hour ratting anoms in nullsec, you either 1) suck or 2) dont know how to rat. Please have someone with "skills" and knows how to "iskperhour" do it. Then go to Highsec and run LVL 4 missions and compare the two. Your "proof" will be a joke, like everyone knows it is. That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar. Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions. Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODELBONJOUR
Bonjour Medam! Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1214
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:17:00 -
[66] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODEL
BONJOUR
Previously, on your numbers are fabricated:
La Nariz: here's a spreadsheet showing stuff I actually went out and did. Kimmi: ooh, that's a neat idea - here's some stuff I did, too, and the numbers seem to agree. Guy who thinks he's an AWACS plane: OMG U MADE T3H NUMBERZ UP!!!!oneone
And now, the next thrilling installment. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
620
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:19:00 -
[67] - Quote
admiral root wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODEL
BONJOUR Previously, on your numbers are fabricated: La Nariz: here's a spreadsheet showing stuff I actually went out and did. Kimmi: ooh, that's a neat idea - here's some stuff I did, too, and the numbers seem to agree. Guy who thinks he's an AWACS plane: OMG U MADE T3H NUMBERZ UP!!!!oneone And now, the next thrilling installment. BONJOUR |
Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
981
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:32:00 -
[68] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:baltec1 wrote:General Nusense wrote:This "proof" is a load of ****. If you are only making 69 mil isk per hour ratting anoms in nullsec, you either 1) suck or 2) dont know how to rat. Please have someone with "skills" and knows how to "iskperhour" do it. Then go to Highsec and run LVL 4 missions and compare the two. Your "proof" will be a joke, like everyone knows it is. That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar. Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions. Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODELBONJOUR
I have a system you can borrow if you'd like to prove them wrong.
|
Mythrandier
Corporate Scum Cult of War
372
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:40:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:baltec1 wrote:General Nusense wrote:This "proof" is a load of ****. If you are only making 69 mil isk per hour ratting anoms in nullsec, you either 1) suck or 2) dont know how to rat. Please have someone with "skills" and knows how to "iskperhour" do it. Then go to Highsec and run LVL 4 missions and compare the two. Your "proof" will be a joke, like everyone knows it is. That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar. Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions. Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODELBONJOUR I have a system you can borrow if you'd like to prove them wrong.
Touch+¬, mon cheri. "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." --á D. Adams. |
Cebraio
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
409
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:45:00 -
[70] - Quote
Snakebyte Jack wrote:IDGAD wrote:Nullsec bots are actually very rare. I've done highsec ganking in the SAME three systems for a long time, and have caught over two dozen botting raven navy issues and marauders. Mostly it's raven navies on under skilled toons that are botting, most likely Chinese bots that farm and skill up their characters only to sell them when they are maxed for PvE.
The real botting problem is in highsec, not nullsec. Tell that to all the AFK Ishtars in Deklein. I think what your ganking in highsec is new players who are too scared to even speak in local when you start shooting their underskilled ravens. AFK Ishtars are an abomination of game play (I have two), but they are legitimate game play until CCP fixes them. They are in no way related to botting, quite the opposite. They just work because the drone mechanics allow them to work afk. Botting requires external tools that give commands to the client/server. Two totally different and unrelated concepts.
With these Ishtars I make 60m per hour, per character while watching local and intel all the time to avoid being ganked. So it's not even afk really, it just doesn't require a lot of interaction with the keyboard.
As others have mentioned. Ratting bots in nullsec are a rare sight. The reason is simple: You can run the bot in level 4 missions and be protected by concord and npc corps. In addition level 4s will have a similar (or better) isk revenue than what most people make in anomalies. |
|
Marc Durant
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:55:00 -
[71] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:baltec1 wrote: That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar.
Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr
High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions.
Run anoms with the bling ships used in high sec, profit. You try to back this argument up every time by comparing apples & oranges. 'We use a cheap T2 Cruiser that doesn't make as much as a 10 billion isk battleship, so something is wrong'. Also incursions support no more than 80 people with 100 mil/hr (Assuming 23/day like one can rat, and we all know ratting bots do exist, heck, Bots were capable of handling the old probe interface, let alone the new one, they certainly can rat). if you want to take a higher benchmark citing perfect TCRC walls & perfect pirate fleets all with officer bling that number of people supported drops to about 40. Across ALL OF EVE! Including those Null sec incursions that get run to clear cyno jam effects. So, lets stop pretending Incursions are actually significant when talking about income. 90 mil/hr is the most you will get out of anoms with a bling boat. High sec missions beats that, hence why when we tell GSF pilots how to make isk for cap ships most of the advice is to take advantage of high sec.
I like how people keep inflating numbers to support their cause.
Also, the Fan fest graph showed how Ratters are the most prolific botters and ratting is pretty much a 0.0 only thing, then add to that the 0.0 mining botters (total mining bots, spread over null and high sec) and the clearcut result is obvious; most botting happens in 0.0
|
Elmonky
Titans of The Short Bus
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 13:56:00 -
[72] - Quote
My mobile phone signal can barely penetrate all the tin foil.
Hands up everyone who has genuinely uncovered a bot - I'm guessing that unless you work for CCP it's very few. I imagine that if i flew into a belt in my Dominix I would drop *insert drone preference here*, wait for bots and let the drones deal with them. Rinse and Repeat whilst I trim the hedges. Although that would be dumb.
It doesn't sound diffcult to emulate bot behaviour either seeing how most times it's a case of running away from anyone in local.
The BEST thing you can do.. is either petition the ''bot'', put the tin foil back in the drawer as you are stopping me from wrapping my kids sandwiches in it, or shoot the ship.
|
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11486
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:10:00 -
[73] - Quote
Marc Durant wrote:
I like how people keep inflating numbers to support their cause.
Also, the Fan fest graph showed how Ratters are the most prolific botters and ratting is pretty much a 0.0 only thing, then add to that the 0.0 mining botters (total mining bots, spread over null and high sec) and the clearcut result is obvious; most botting happens in 0.0
Going need some evidence to go with that. Because right now we have pie charts from team security that shows the vast bulk of bots reside in highsec, caldari space, mostly in the Forge, Lonetrek and the Citadel (they hold over 50% of bots in just those three regions) Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11486
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:14:00 -
[74] - Quote
Elmonky wrote:My mobile phone signal can barely penetrate all the tin foil.
Hands up everyone who has genuinely uncovered a bot - I'm guessing that unless you work for CCP it's very few. I imagine that if i flew into a belt in my Dominix I would drop *insert drone preference here*, wait for bots and let the drones deal with them. Rinse and Repeat whilst I trim the hedges. Although that would be dumb.
It doesn't sound diffcult to emulate bot behaviour either seeing how most times it's a case of running away from anyone in local.
The BEST thing you can do.. is either petition the ''bot'', put the tin foil back in the drawer as you are stopping me from wrapping my kids sandwiches in it, or shoot the ship.
Its easy to find mining bots.
Blow up their ship and watch to see if the pod continues to try to mine. We got hundreds of them reported in the first 2 ice interdictions. Most enjoyable. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
152
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:16:00 -
[75] - Quote
How do you see if the pod tries to mine? I |
De'Veldrin
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
2070
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:18:00 -
[76] - Quote
Ka'Narlist wrote:How do you see if the pod tries to mine? I The bot is too stupid to realize it has no mining ship, so you watch the pod warp to station, warp back, spend three minutes "mining", warp to station to "unload", wash, rinse, repeat.
It's pretty obvious. GÇ£SandboxGÇ¥ does not mean that you will succeed at anything you attempt; it means you can attempt anything you want to succeed at. One of the largest obstacles in the way of your success is other players. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3224
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ka'Narlist wrote:How do you see if the pod tries to mine? I the pod warps to station, docks, and flies back to the asteroid belt eery 15-20 minutes, as if it was unloading ore.
efb |
Marc Durant
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:29:00 -
[78] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Marc Durant wrote:
I like how people keep inflating numbers to support their cause.
Also, the Fan fest graph showed how Ratters are the most prolific botters and ratting is pretty much a 0.0 only thing, then add to that the 0.0 mining botters (total mining bots, spread over null and high sec) and the clearcut result is obvious; most botting happens in 0.0
Going need some evidence to go with that. Because right now we have pie charts from team security that shows the vast bulk of bots reside in highsec, caldari space, mostly in the Forge, Lonetrek and the Citadel (they hold over 50% of bots in just those three regions)
Most CONCENTRATED in high sec, yes... for obvious (caldari/jita) reasons. But OVERALL, in the whole of null sec, there's more. Hence the other graph showing how the majority of botters are ratters. And while I'll happily agree to how in high sec there'll probably be more mining bots than in 0.0, even if 0.0 had no mining bots then STILL ratting bots would make it #1. But as there'll be mining bots in 0.0 as well it's clear that 0.0 is the biggest issue in this regard. |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11487
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:32:00 -
[79] - Quote
Marc Durant wrote:baltec1 wrote:Marc Durant wrote:
I like how people keep inflating numbers to support their cause.
Also, the Fan fest graph showed how Ratters are the most prolific botters and ratting is pretty much a 0.0 only thing, then add to that the 0.0 mining botters (total mining bots, spread over null and high sec) and the clearcut result is obvious; most botting happens in 0.0
Going need some evidence to go with that. Because right now we have pie charts from team security that shows the vast bulk of bots reside in highsec, caldari space, mostly in the Forge, Lonetrek and the Citadel (they hold over 50% of bots in just those three regions) Most CONCENTRATED in high sec, yes... for obvious (cadlari/jita) reasons. But OVERALL, in the whole of null sec, there's more. Hence the other graph showing how the majority of botters are ratters. And while I'll happily agree to how in high sec there'll probably be more mining bots than in 0.0, even if 0.0 had no mining bots then STILL ratting bots would make it #1. But as there'll be mining bots in 0.0 as well it's clear that 0.0 is the biggest issue in this regard.
What graph would that be?
Because the one I am looking at shows that if you add up all of nullsec you get fewer bots than live in the Forge region in caldari high sec. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
1218
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:34:00 -
[80] - Quote
Marc Durant wrote:Hence the other graph showing how the majority of botters are ratters.
Do you have a link to said graph by any chance? No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
|
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3225
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:38:00 -
[81] - Quote
i did hear something about lots of bots being battleship bots? but are battleships common for ratting anoms?
it's second-hand, anyway, so i'm going to watch the security presentation for myself now |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11487
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:43:00 -
[82] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:i did hear something about lots of bots being battleship bots? but are battleships common for ratting anoms?
it's second-hand, anyway, so i'm going to watch the security presentation for myself now
Battleships are somewhat rare in CFC space due to the warp times, we mostly use the ishtar. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Marc Durant
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 14:56:00 -
[83] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:What graph would that be?
Because the one I am looking at shows that if you add up all of nullsec you get fewer bots than live in the Forge region in caldari high sec.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CZR9w3ftjY#t=1148
- edit -
And those are the ones caught, I bet there's a lot more bot petitioning happening in high sec than in 0.0. |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
3226
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 15:06:00 -
[84] - Quote
yeh i doubt anyone's running highsec ratting bots
Marc Durant wrote:I bet there's a lot more bot petitioning happening in high sec than in 0.0. there is zero information available on this so don't speculate |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11487
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 15:11:00 -
[85] - Quote
According to this years presentation the Forge and Lonetrek once again dwarf everywhere else for combat bots and mining bots. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
621
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 15:35:00 -
[86] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:E-2C Hawkeye wrote:baltec1 wrote:General Nusense wrote:This "proof" is a load of ****. If you are only making 69 mil isk per hour ratting anoms in nullsec, you either 1) suck or 2) dont know how to rat. Please have someone with "skills" and knows how to "iskperhour" do it. Then go to Highsec and run LVL 4 missions and compare the two. Your "proof" will be a joke, like everyone knows it is. That's what isk you make using the most popular ratting ship the ishtar. Max you will ever make from anoms is 90 mil/hr High sec level 4 missions not only matches that but 100+ mil/hr isnt too hard to do. That's before we get into incursions. Ugggh here we go again with the fabricated numbers which we know have to be true because this is in fact the internet and I AM A FRENCH MODELBONJOUR I have a system you can borrow if you'd like to prove them wrong. Thanks, but why worry with it? I will continue to do the things that make the most isk for me, not what someone else would like for me to believe. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
6242
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 15:51:00 -
[87] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote: Thanks, but why worry with it? I will continue to do the things that make the most isk for me, not what someone else would like for me to believe.
Here's a translation for those who don't speak French.
"I refuse to do anything that might challenge the falsehoods behind my preconceptions. Because Grr Goons." "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Psychotic Monk for CSM9. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
5323
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 16:24:00 -
[88] - Quote
It's a good thing that the CCP security people aren't like the forum warriors that only care about blaming the players they don't like for the botting.
Botting happens in the game. Period.
How does the righteous indignation of various factions that contribute to the fracturing of what should be something that all of us should be united against solve anything? It doesn't, of course. Just more petty bickering by the forum morons that will use anything and everything to further their agenda.
I'm glad that CCP seems to understand that it's a systemic problem and not just a high sec/ low sec/ whatever thing. Get off your partisan horses for 5 minutes every once in as while. Take a step back. Look at how stupid you are being and laugh at yourselves.
Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Ahost Gceo
Probe Patrol Ixtab.
97
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 16:30:00 -
[89] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:It's a good thing that the CCP security people aren't like the forum warriors that only care about blaming the players they don't like for the botting. Botting happens in the game. Period. How does the righteous indignation of various factions that contribute to the fracturing of what should be something that all of us should be united against solve anything? It doesn't, of course. Just more petty bickering by the forum morons that will use anything and everything to further their agenda. I'm glad that CCP seems to understand that it's a systemic problem and not just a high sec/ low sec/ whatever thing. Get off your partisan horses for 5 minutes every once in as while. Take a step back. Look at how stupid you are being and laugh at yourselves. Mr Epeen To add onto what he is saying, I've popped out of a wormhole and roamed in just about every single null region in EVE at some point. I have seen bottish behavior in all of these places and don't even really care to remember who it was that I suspected of botting. There is a botbear living in every backyard. ??? |
Veld San
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 19:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:If you see someone you suspect is botting, petition it. Don't come to the forums with (a) new stupid idea.
If petitioning worked and was effective then there would not be anywhere near as many CFC bots as there are. 90%+ of them would disappear. Obviously petitioning and reporting is completely ineffective in this situation and no longer worth the bother.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |