Limiting space needed for a living is better , as more people could live in current eve universe.

I' am still unhappy about what CCP did to Drone Space , and loot drops + refining in the rest of the space.

I know we have miners , but think if the eve could be not more interesting if typical battleship rat earn to a player :
- 200k isk of bounty.
- 800k isk in mineral alloys
- module drop

WHY?
Because this would really promote local industry.
Just by ratting you would get a lot of minerals for new ship hulls.
Minerals that are quite hard to move , but can easily fuel hulls for local PVP.

It hurts miners.

Just by ratting you would get a lot of minerals for new ship hulls.
Minerals that are quite hard to move , but can easily fuel hulls for local PVP.

It helps other people, additionally we are getting goods on place.
Goods that should be hard to move.

Isk is bad thing that you get for killing rats , why because it is constantly loosing value, so this leads to nonsense cycle.

I can buy 1 battleship after hour of ratting .
Because i rat ( also many more people) there is more isk in the system so isk loose its value.
[Week Later]
I need to rat 1h and 10 minutes to buy the same battleship.
I rat more , like more people. Again isk loose its value.
[Week later[
I need to rat 1h and 20min to buy the same battleship .
(...)

i think this is very bad to this game.
Ships should be cheep as hell. They should cost at most half of their current prices - why?
I have 200mil.
What will bring you and other people more fun.
Killing/loosing 1 ship that will cost 200mil , or 3 the same ships that will cost those 200mil?

Escalating costs - that's something bad.

The same goes to supers - they should be nerfed , but if CCP decide to keep them in game super carries should cost around 5bil, titans 20b.

Why?
CCP desires large capital battles that will fuel their adversing campaign - and those changes will eventually lead to this , as at cost of 1 mother ship you can loose 4 or 5.

That is exactly why CCP effectively removed it from the game.

We certainly have different opinions on Fun. I rather have the expensive ships stay expensive so that people are getting a bit more wary about using them. Less expensive ships in battles means more smaller ships and in turn means more fun. Unfortunately this isn't really working either because mineral prices have dropped significantly. Another thing is that EVE ought not to be considered a mere game, it should be considered a hobby, a life simulation in space. Short term, henceforth, should play a minor role and long term motivation should play a big role. Concentrating on this thick idea of providing quick fun and quick dumb PVP for the sake of it, is not what I think is good for the game. It should be possible, but concentrating the entire game's activities around it -- or quick and easy PVE for that matter -- is detrimental for the game.

Influence of T1 minerals on T2 hulls is small, the same goes for the Faction/Pirate ships.

What I'm suggesting?
Cheep T1 Hulls.
Influence of T1 minerals on T2 hulls is small, the same goes for the Faction/Pirate ships.

It hurts miners.

in compensation the changes to drone space massively reduced the supplies while increasing the generation of isk, causing a lot of the current inflation in eve ( yes lots of inflation, compare current prices to 2008 for simple example).

CCP must do more well tought solutions for economical issues, and they cannto be huge hammers like almost every of their actions. They need to act with more finesse.

in compensation the changes to drone space massively reduced the supplies while increasing the generation of isk, causing a lot of the current inflation in eve ( yes lots of inflation, compare current prices to 2008 for simple example).

CCP must do more well tought solutions for economical issues, and they cannto be huge hammers like almost every of their actions. They need to act with more finesse.

Its one of the reasons why we want outposts to get missions and have them as the primary income for line members in null. They inject far less isk.

The incompetence in this topic is soooo high.... at a discusting pukable level.... on both sides

The incompetence in this topic is soooo high.... at a discusting pukable level.... on both sides

No need to fix Null, in a few more patches WH's will pretty much be an annex of Null

What i am missing is the instant relocation by jump /titan bridges and jump drives that also have to be changed.

post 1567

Its not in there because it simply isn't needed. You deal with power projection by removing the need to send fleets half way across the galaxy to defend you assets.

Great summary of good ideas from whole thread. I like especially the part with L4's in null. This would be an opportuninty to pull PvEers from hisec, risk vs reward and potential recruits base.
But...

So you don't defend them then? If i have ability to move forces fast, i will use it, no matter the size. If i have ability i will bring as many as i can. If you attack with small group (because you don't need huge ball to destroy structure) you would face non-proportional response, because i can. Strenght in numbers.