Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 42 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1259
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:47:00 -
[1021] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Admittedly, this is what makes it extremely difficult for me to empathize with these individuals. They actually enjoy taunting and provoking negative reactions from others. And they proudly post and display "tear collection" trophies publicly so that others like them can enjoy and stroke their ego. If they can get their victims to rage-quit or rage-banned, that's just the sweet cherry on top. It's very sadistic behavior.
And by no means am I suggesting "they deserve to be doxxed" or threatened in real life. No one does. But how much empathy could you have for someone like this? They enjoy making others angry, upset, and miserable for cheap laughs and giggles. One argument that comes often from "their" side is, thats just "a game" and "pixels shooting pixels", it is that hypocrisy that really angers me, an elaborate lie just to get more emotional responses. And often when the **** hits the fan, it its the innocent and the noninvolved. Its realy bad that those guys mother cried, i really really hate something like that. But playing with emotional resonses is playing with old duds. Some might blow right into your face.
So because you get emotional about me destroying your pixels with my pixels I should be banned... Great!
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
6050
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:47:00 -
[1022] - Quote
Andski wrote:i also find it hilarious that he believes he's important enough to be shown evidence
Now where have i heard that before?
Could it have been you and the other line deniers demanding evidence from CCP. Evidence that would inevitably reveal some of how they go after you lug nuts that are dying to have a rule to skirt? Evidence that would reveal some of how their security works so you could script around it?
You think you're important enough to be privy to that, do you?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Good Christ, you people are delusional.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11479
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:48:00 -
[1023] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Andski wrote:i also find it hilarious that he believes he's important enough to be shown evidence
Now where have i heard that before? Could it have been you and the other line deniers demanding evidence from CCP. Evidence that would inevitably reveal some of how they go after you lug nuts that are dying to have a rule to skirt? Evidence that would reveal some of how their security works so you could script around it? Nobody was asking for that. They were asking for reasons why these people were banned. That doesn't reveal anything about CCP's security. Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:51:00 -
[1024] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Remiel was playing EVE in a perfectly acceptable and legitimate way.
He did a lot of things. I dont know the details, but no wonder he is a posts a lot here. His way of playing and his account maybe in danger of a future ban.
James Amril-Kesh wrote: This does not ******* excuse doxing and real life threats to person and family. If you think so you are blaming the victim.
Thinking is not blaming. I explanned more than enough that in this case his mother was the victim of a criminal act.
But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions.
Forum Main |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
6050
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:52:00 -
[1025] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Andski wrote:i also find it hilarious that he believes he's important enough to be shown evidence
Now where have i heard that before? Could it have been you and the other line deniers demanding evidence from CCP. Evidence that would inevitably reveal some of how they go after you lug nuts that are dying to have a rule to skirt? Evidence that would reveal some of how their security works so you could script around it? Nobody was asking for that. They were asking for reasons why these people were banned. That doesn't reveal anything about CCP's security.
Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money.
Mr Epeen There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1259
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:52:00 -
[1026] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:La Rynx wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Admittedly, this is what makes it extremely difficult for me to empathize with these individuals. They actually enjoy taunting and provoking negative reactions from others. And they proudly post and display "tear collection" trophies publicly so that others like them can enjoy and stroke their ego. If they can get their victims to rage-quit or rage-banned, that's just the sweet cherry on top. It's very sadistic behavior.
And by no means am I suggesting "they deserve to be doxxed" or threatened in real life. No one does. But how much empathy could you have for someone like this? They enjoy making others angry, upset, and miserable for cheap laughs and giggles. One argument that come often from "their" side is, thats just "a game" and "pixels shooting pixels", it is that hypocrisy, an elobaret lie just to get more emotional responses. And often when the **** hits the fan, it its the innocent and the noninvolved. Its realy bad that those guys mother cried, i really really hate something like that. But playing with emotional resonses is playing with old bombs. Some might blow right into your face. No. Remiel was playing EVE in a perfectly acceptable and legitimate way. This does not ******* excuse doxing and real life threats to person and family. If you think so you are blaming the victim.
No you're wrong. The guy just got his pixels destroyed by some mean ganker. It wasn't his fault he had an emotional response and threatened to kill the ganker. . CCP obviously needs to ban the ganker for causing this emotional response. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11479
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:53:00 -
[1027] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote: Remiel was playing EVE in a perfectly acceptable and legitimate way.
He did a lot of things. I dont know the details, but no wonder he is a posts a lot here. His way of playing and his account maybe in danger of a future ban. Oh, so because someone took it too far and doxxed him, he must have done something wrong? That's blaming.
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:This does not ******* excuse doxing and real life threats to person and family. If you think so you are blaming the victim. Thinking is not blaming. I explanned more than enough that in this case his mother was the victim of a criminal act. But not him, right? No of course not. You're blaming.
La Rynx wrote:But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions. Driving a car puts you in constant danger of a sudden and early death. Does that mean I deserve it if I get into an accident? Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:57:00 -
[1028] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:La Rynx wrote:But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions. Driving a car puts you in constant danger of a sudden and early death. Does that mean I deserve it if I get into an accident?
I see why you are asking for exact rules, you have some problems with your cognition. I can not help you with that.
But Yes, why not.
Lets say you drive your car drunk and angry and drive full speed into a kindergarden group. A lot of those children die, lots are crippled for life. What do you say? Forum Main |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11480
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:58:00 -
[1029] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money. Mr Epeen I'm pretty sure that every step between "CCP says x person was banned because he specifically did this thing" and "we've cracked CCP's security scheme" is something along the lines of "Mr Epeen talks out of his ass and suggests some causal link between completely unrelated things for the sole purpose of being a contrarian." Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
5573
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:59:00 -
[1030] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:And by no means am I suggesting "they deserve to be doxxed" or threatened in real life. No one does. But how much empathy could you have for someone like this? They enjoy making others angry, upset, and miserable for cheap laughs and giggles.
The same empathy I have for someone who gets threatened or harassed for bragging about a Chess tournament win (bragging which sometimes makes the losers of the tournament angry, upset, and/or miserable).
They are the victim of a crime/EULA violation*.
And there you are blaming them for being such.
*I don't know if doxxing is a crime everywhere/anywhere, but making threats certainly is in many jurisdictions. "It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon |
|
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:59:00 -
[1031] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money. Mr Epeen I'm pretty sure that every step between "CCP says x person was banned because he specifically did this thing" and "we've cracked CCP's security scheme" is something along the lines of "Mr Epeen talks out of his ass and suggests some causal link between completely unrelated things for the sole purpose of being a contrarian."
I like your tears. But your arguments lack qualitiy and reasons. Forum Main |
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
67
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:00:00 -
[1032] - Quote
evepal wrote:There's a 3 hour recording on sound-cloud of a man and his wife taken past breaking point, when they already had possession of all his assets. Not only did they not stop when it when it was clear that the man was agitated well beyond necessary, but they further increased their efforts to humiliate him. To top this off, they then uploaded the audio of this as a trophy for what great job they had done to these individuals, and shared them publicly.
Now, I absolutely love scamming and making people sing for their pod (even if they still blow it up anyway). I however, do not appreciate when people find it necessary to break an individual down to point of physical distress for the sake of self enjoyment alone... And all the whining and demanding of specific directives is just players trying to gain an edge in the game they choose to play in the real world by exploiting CCP assets, tarring CCP's name by association.
Anyone demanding detailed, specific instructions on how not to get banned for harrassment, pony up! Post links to your audio captures. You want specifics? Provide your own, because that's how you find out what's behind the curtain. TOS and EULA make that much perfectly clear.
No? Worried that that audio might get you banned? Then reevaluate your behavior. What you are afraid to post is exactly what CCP wants you afraid to do.
There's your line. You draw it. Wherever you feel comfortable. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11480
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:01:00 -
[1033] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:La Rynx wrote:But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions. Driving a car puts you in constant danger of a sudden and early death. Does that mean I deserve it if I get into an accident? I see why you are asking for exact rules, you have some problems with your cognition. You must be having problems with yours, because I never asked for exact rules.
La Rynx wrote:Lets say you drive your car drunk and angry and drive full speed into a kindergarden group. What do you say? I say you should stop moving the goalposts. Driving drunk is not a legitimate (i.e. legal) way of driving.
Once again you're presuming that because the gank victim responded with threats and doxxing, Remiel must have done something proportionate in order to deserve such treatment. You have absolutely no evidence of such, but you still desire to blame the victim because it's the only thing that fits into your own neat little perspective. Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:02:00 -
[1034] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: And there you are blaming them for being such.
guys fishing for emotional reactions maybe victims, but are they innocent?
Forum Main |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
6053
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:03:00 -
[1035] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money. Mr Epeen I'm pretty sure that every step between "CCP says x person was banned because he specifically did this thing" and "we've cracked CCP's security scheme" is something along the lines of "Mr Epeen talks out of his ass and suggests some causal link between completely unrelated things for the sole purpose of being a contrarian."
I'm sure the next step after CCP saying here's why we banned them is you demanding they show proof of how they know that.
They know this and they are not falling for your entitled demands. They know full well not to give anything to you lot. Because you'll never be satisfied with the answers and keep demanding more.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Seven Koskanaiken
The Minutemen The Bastion
1348
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:03:00 -
[1036] - Quote
Do you really think there is an employee in CCP HQ who receives a file with hard incontrovertible evidence about a doxxer who sends threats in real life and decides "oh actually I will not ban this person, I really want him to stay in the game mwahaha"?
Or maybe for a more likely reason like, ykno, maybe just not enough evidence? |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11480
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:03:00 -
[1037] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money. Mr Epeen I'm pretty sure that every step between "CCP says x person was banned because he specifically did this thing" and "we've cracked CCP's security scheme" is something along the lines of "Mr Epeen talks out of his ass and suggests some causal link between completely unrelated things for the sole purpose of being a contrarian." I like your tears. But your arguments lack qualitiy and reasons. Just saying it doesn't make it true. What you said doesn't even make any sense, because I wasn't making an argument, I was calling out someone else who was making an argument that, amusingly enough, lacks "quality and reasons". Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
evepal
Scholar of Rationality
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:11:00 -
[1038] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:[...]
As a victim of harassment, do you believe CCP should ban players who harass others?
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11488
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:12:00 -
[1039] - Quote
Snupe Doggur wrote:evepal wrote:There's a 3 hour recording on sound-cloud of a man and his wife taken past breaking point, when they already had possession of all his assets. Not only did they not stop when it when it was clear that the man was agitated well beyond necessary, but they further increased their efforts to humiliate him. To top this off, they then uploaded the audio of this as a trophy for what great job they had done to these individuals, and shared them publicly.
Now, I absolutely love scamming and making people sing for their pod (even if they still blow it up anyway). I however, do not appreciate when people find it necessary to break an individual down to point of physical distress for the sake of self enjoyment alone... And all the whining and demanding of specific directives is just players trying to gain an edge in the game they choose to play in the real world by exploiting CCP assets, tarring CCP's name by association. Anyone demanding detailed, specific instructions on how not to get banned for harrassment, pony up! You go first. Post links to your audio captures. You want specifics? Provide your own, because that's how you find out what's behind the curtain. TOS and EULA make that much perfectly clear. No? Worried that that audio might get you banned? Then reevaluate your behavior. What you are afraid to post is exactly what CCP wants you afraid to do. There's your line. You draw it. Wherever you feel comfortable. This is where we are now
This is what you and CCP think we want, and have been using as a strawman
This is what we actually want Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9713
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:14:00 -
[1040] - Quote
evepal wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:[...] As a victim of harassment, do you believe CCP should ban players who harass others?
I think CCP should ban actual out of game harassment of a real person.
Not for hurt feelings. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11485
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:16:00 -
[1041] - Quote
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote: I say you should stop moving the goalposts. Driving drunk is not a legitimate (i.e. legal) way of driving.
You said nothing of legal... Ganking in highsec and lowsec is a crime, in highsec CONCORDE will get you. As i said, bad example. You're so full of ****. Ganking in highsec is still a legitimate way to play the game. I specifically said "Remiel was playing EVE in a perfectly acceptable and legitimate way."
La Rynx wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote: to blame the victim
I explained my thoughts about this, i am not blaming someone. You have explained your thoughts, and they show that you actually are, as much as you may think or pretend otherwise. What you've been saying specifically constitutes blaming.
La Rynx wrote:Nothing more than tears and anger from the people in danger of losing their accounts. I'm pretty sure I'm not in danger of losing my account, but with GMs nowadays you can never really be sure. Maybe they'll find that one evemail that Erotica 1 sent me that one time many months ago and ban me for that. Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
evepal
Scholar of Rationality
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:16:00 -
[1042] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:evepal wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:[...] As a victim of harassment, do you believe CCP should ban players who harass others? I think CCP should ban actual out of game harassment of a real person. Not for hurt feelings.
So how do you define the difference between harassment of a real person and hurt feelings? |
Helene Fidard
6
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:20:00 -
[1043] - Quote
This, so much.
The rules about real-life harassment right now are a grey area, because CCP won't define what they are. Keep your grey area, but define where the grey area stops.
Just because you are firm about what is absolutely not allowed doesn't mean you have to throw away discretion in all other cases. |
evepal
Scholar of Rationality
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:22:00 -
[1044] - Quote
Can you provide an example to back up this claim where this line has moved?
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9711
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:23:00 -
[1045] - Quote
evepal wrote: So how do you define the difference between harassment of a real person and hurt feelings?
"You'll figure it out".
Or, since I am not an inveterate jackass with something to hide...
Real life harassment is involved when you are making an attack on the person behind the keyboard. This explicitly requires knowledge of who that person actually is. Doxxing someone is real life harassment. Sending them a picture of their own house with "See Ya Soon" scrawled in red through the in game mail client is real life harassment. Calling their family and/or real life employer is real life harassment.
Laughing at someone who got ganked is not. Laughing at someone who got scammed is not. Blowing up someone's ship repeatedly is not. Those are all directed at and revolve around an exclusively in game action. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11485
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:25:00 -
[1046] - Quote
evepal wrote:Can you provide an example to back up this claim where this line has moved? This thread. Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9713
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:26:00 -
[1047] - Quote
Here, in case I was unclear.
"Kaarous Aldurald" is not a real person. He is a character in a videogame. Absolutely ANYTHING that happens to him or his possessions in the context of a permissible in game action is fair game.
"Blankety Blankblank, who lives in Blankville, Blankistan" is a real person. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2182
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:29:00 -
[1048] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:But this is all wildly off topic, and I would have thought that the ISDs wouldn't dive into a discussion solely to engage in an off-topic tangent. Even worse, deleting posts to make it seem as if they never happened. If you delete posts, you should certainly post that you are doing so and why to at least maintain some semblance of transparency. You know, just like every ISD does always (or at least, I hope). True on both accounts, my apologies.
Yes, I am in the process of cleaning this thread and forgot to post as such as we normally do.
Thread temporarily locked for some cleaning.
ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
11488
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 22:08:00 -
[1049] - Quote
Huh. Somehow we managed to stay on page 42. Enjoying the rain today? ;) |
evepal
Scholar of Rationality
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 22:10:00 -
[1050] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Real life harassment is involved when you are making an attack on the person behind the keyboard. This explicitly requires knowledge of who that person actually is. Doxxing someone is real life harassment. Sending them a picture of their own house with "See Ya Soon" scrawled in red through the in game mail client is real life harassment. Calling their family and/or real life employer is real life harassment.
See, this is where I disagree. I don't think you need to know the person, in order to attack them out of game. If you remove the question of whose identity it is, then I agree. The points following doxxing, are examples of harassment and in the one case "See Ya Soon" can be be extended as far as threats, and those are clearly a case for the judicial system, and not just a ban in a video game.
Such as: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2012/aug/29/police-officer-arrested-facebook-trolling
(Incidentally in this case, it's a person who didn't know the victim prior to the trolling, who was found guilty.)
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Laughing at someone who got ganked is not. Laughing at someone who got scammed is not. Blowing up someone's ship repeatedly is not. Those are all directed at and revolve around an exclusively in game action.
I too agree that laughing at another persons misfortune isn't grounds for harassment.
Though, suppose this completely hypothetical: I invited you onto a VOIP program, insulted you for 6 hours ranging from your nationality to implying the way you talked inferred your sexual orientation, and then uploaded that with the intent to share to others, for them to laugh.
In that hypothetical situation, would you deem them harassing the character, or the person behind it? Should CCP ban them for us having meant each other on the forums, and escalating it from there?
James Amril-Kesh wrote:This thread.
Whilst I appreciate the sentiment you have, could you post an example of where the line once was and then has moved? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 42 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |