Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 .. 37 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bdd/77bdd88a9dc9803a73f144e5456aa8bd32c49e74" alt="Mike Azariah Mike Azariah"
Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1694
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:41:00 -
[511] - Quote
Capqu wrote: 3) i appreciate that you did that, but after the devblog has come out is often too late, which i pretty much am resigned into believing this time around too. i am aware that is not your fault and not in your control. as for speaking from a position of inexperience, maybe you don't, but you are not the only csm and its not unheard of for people to push their own agendas at a detriment to the greater good.
basically im depressed and disappointed as heck because this isn't the first time ccp has ignored minority player base when they destroy some niche of the game. first they came for the rat ai changes, mission flipping etc. etc.
Well, the NDA kind of forbids me from asking folks ahead of dev blogs. Sometimes I try to find a way around it but most times I try to be fast on the response and see how well I can shift the position from the original. That is why you see me asking for input and top two things you would like chenged.
Sorry to hear about the depression but weren't you normal bomber folk depressed if all the bombing in your corp was being handed to the isbox guy? or did I misread that?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b96ac/b96ac81e5c071b65b84991b42c6b9278ffe97157" alt="PotatoOverdose PotatoOverdose"
PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders DARKNESS.
2367
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:49:00 -
[512] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Capqu wrote:the csm may indeed be doing its job, but noone on the csm has any actual experience with bombing fleets / isbombing. in fact i looked up all the csm members and the only one with any appreciable background using bombs is Ali Aras, and he isn't the most active of pilots with no activity since june and sub a hundred bombing kills before that.
couple of corrections 1) do you assume that all csm fly only on their mains? 2) Ali is female 3) When time and duties allow, I fly and keep in touch with the Bombers Bar. When this dev blog went out the first thing I did was go in channel with them and talk about the changes . . . with people it directly effected. I do NOT talk from a position of inexperience, I talk to the people who ARE experienced and try to represent them. m How many fleets has bombers bar wiped with their bombing runs over the past month? And how many fleets have ammzi, space, oodell, or any of the numerous other well-known isboxing bombers killed?
The problem with these changes is that they don't have a pronounced effect on the most prolific source of bomb related issues. It's a question of throughput.
It just looks like your ignoring the salient issue (isboxer, and how it applies to bombers in particular) because it also touches on an issue (isboxer as a whole) that probably represents 2%-3% of CCP's revenue. Or maybe that is the salient issue... |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fd83/0fd83959b95a3b0946f6f1537d01f20e5fb54377" alt="Capqu Capqu"
Capqu
Love Squad Pasta Syndicate
823
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:49:00 -
[513] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Capqu wrote: 3) i appreciate that you did that, but after the devblog has come out is often too late, which i pretty much am resigned into believing this time around too. i am aware that is not your fault and not in your control. as for speaking from a position of inexperience, maybe you don't, but you are not the only csm and its not unheard of for people to push their own agendas at a detriment to the greater good.
basically im depressed and disappointed as heck because this isn't the first time ccp has ignored minority player base when they destroy some niche of the game. first they came for the rat ai changes, mission flipping etc. etc.
Well, the NDA kind of forbids me from asking folks ahead of dev blogs. Sometimes I try to find a way around it but most times I try to be fast on the response and see how well I can shift the position from the original. That is why you see me asking for input and top two things you would like chenged. Sorry to hear about the depression but weren't you normal bomber folk depressed if all the bombing in your corp was being handed to the isbox guy? or did I misread that? m
nah i understand about the nda, i'm not blaming you. main priority for change would be ANYTHING that makes bombs apply damage equally to shield/armor doctrines instead of a soley a power-level nerf, and secondary priority would be something to discourage isboxer
yea we hate it, that's life it's like knowing you're on a team with 7 of your bestest pals, but if you ditch all of them and just play by yourself instead you'll amount to more than you could ever achieve together. a couple of those pals i used to bomb with / fc bombers with decided to go down that route, and i can't blame them for it. the power of friendship doesn't work in video games, only anime. when you have 3/4 squads of isboxed bombers, there really isnt any point in adding more human bombers - the combination of diminishing returns and massively increased effort takes away any illusion of enjoyment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNpMiT5qpyI |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48c37/48c3743c9165e9042c9f47537c1ca063d8809a8a" alt="Lord Xyon Lord Xyon"
Lord Xyon
Team Hemi
22
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:51:00 -
[514] - Quote
My issue with this is the decloaking part. This is just plain stupid. I am ok with the rest of it. However, your already nerfed wormholes to where people are moving out. Now you take away pretty much most of our life and quite frankly I am getting pretty fed up with some of the stupid decisions. People in wormholes fly mainly cloaked.
Since Fozzie so so clueless as to how cloaking is used elsewhere.
PVP gang fleets in wormholes. Since you still won't put in temp bookmarks or fleet bookmarks or linkable bookmarks and bookmarks also take forever to go out to all toons in a corp. We hunt, we scout we find a targets. We have to fleet warp to 10 on a wormhole. Can't do that anymore we all decloak. You pretty much screw most Wspace travel. Using a covert ops ship as a scout, Warp to scout? Can't do that anymore decloak the covert ops.
Hunting and seeing traffic on a wormhole everyone cloaks up orbiting at 5k from the hole so we can jump in as soon as they do. Nope not anymore we will all decloak each other.
How about rolling holes. Well we already know you hate rolling holes after what you did to us in the last patch. We cloak waiting our timers, we don't warp off. Cloak and orbit the hole. We now will run into each other.
The cloak thing does nothing to an isboxer fleet it only harms everyone else. It harms PVP elsewhere and this stupid idea just generally pisses people off.
So by changing cloaking to somehow try to fix stealth bombers you affect the entire gameplay of: Recon Ships Strategic Cruisers Covert Ops Frigates Expedition Frigates Transport Ships Some Faction Cruisers Some Faction Frigates And then Stealth bombers
Then you also affect every single other ship that has a fit where they can put a cloaking device on. I have put them on dictors and even Battlecruisers before. Heck I have one fit on a Noctis for farming wormholes it floats in space safely cloaked until needed. Admittedly as safe spots which should still keep him safe but still. This is pretty stupid change.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ae35/9ae359897bc7efa59a74b7061adc3911cdd9cec8" alt="Adrie Atticus Adrie Atticus"
Adrie Atticus
Shadows of Rebellion The Bastion
439
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:52:00 -
[515] - Quote
El Space Mariachi wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:wheniaminspoce wrote: *Accidentally dropping some RAM into a tractor unit
I'm here just to point out that the velocity which the hamburger left my mouth at when reading this caused permanent damage to the drywall. it could happen to anyone don't act like you've never dropped anything only to see a tractor unit instantly grab it and pull it away from your grasp leaving you no recourse but to shoot it
Yes, but not multiple times in a row in the same system and same spot. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e60e/2e60eed7639b2d9c0faff828e089040272eaa7dd" alt="Obil Que Obil Que"
Obil Que
Star Explorers Reckoning Star Alliance
176
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 17:56:00 -
[516] - Quote
Komi Toran wrote:Obil Que wrote:I call BS. How many ISboxers do you think are paying for their subscriptions in cash vs how many PLEX via ISK? Makes absolutely no difference. People who pay via ISK make the PLEX->ISK exchange more attractive, and so increase real-world sales. Either way, CCP gets their money. If you didn't have ISBoxers buying PLEX off the in-game market, the price would crash (drastically, as PLEX would no longer be seen as a safe investment) and fewer people would want to plunk down $20 for 400 million ISK.
People bought PLEX at 400 People buy PLEX at 800
So ISBoxer is single handedly responsible for the PLEX market price now? |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09a15/09a1525dc2fa9b3da7457183d8fdeacd52015d9e" alt="Sbrodor Sbrodor"
Sbrodor
Oscura Simmetria Yulai Federation
31
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 18:17:00 -
[517] - Quote
Aram Kachaturian wrote:I checked all your killboards one by one, killmail by killmail and as I thought a large part of you has no ******* idea how bombing worked prior to 2012 and didnt bomb intensively at all before and after.
You are just complaining to ruin CCP Fozzie weekend and that's not cool.
http://oscurasimmetria.eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=186748
http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=7476
http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_ext_id=98091868&view=ships_weapons over 16000 kills in purifier , over 5700 kills in manticore.
before 2012 u don't had the each-other damage of bombs so u can have clacking problem but u had only to manage a single volley.
ccp will introduce a tons of nerf much more than "before 2012". and i think they buffed the bomber to allow people to use them so was a problem and a solution. if they now want to lower use of bombers they have to put the bomber difficult level between "prior 2012" and "now".
with this feature we go in a new level of difficult much more than 2012.
in prior 2012 u dont had:
12 sec flight smart bomb defense higher signature antibomber bubbles lower agility. damage each other bombs.
this is the death. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d5e3/7d5e308784e46fdc3ff84d832f371f4c860c9027" alt="Heinrich Rotwang Heinrich Rotwang"
Heinrich Rotwang
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 18:20:00 -
[518] - Quote
When I was watching that announcement at fanfest, where Mr. Fozzi was talking all that crap about how he wanted to make SBs more fun to fly and improve them and whatnot, I already said thats code for rendering them useless due to nulltears. I stopped putting bomber and blackops related skills in, unsubbed covops/blackops alts, awaiting the nerfbat.. So, it's not like I didn't see the nerf coming.
I gotta say, the extent to which this happens now, still surprises me. The effiency of nerfing every single aspect that made them work is almost German. This isnt a rebalance. This is making sure bombers are utterly useless and ineffective in pvp, especially fleet operations. This is eleminating one of the last remaining ways of asymmetrical warfare and at the same time dealing a maximum of collateral on the game experience of totally unrelated players (eg me - never isboxing, to start with). Good job in once again rigging the dice in favor of the winning party. It's one thing to HTFU and adapt to changing rules. It's a completely different thing to adapt to rules that are changed on demand of the other team. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8af5/d8af5007739060a934897c3aea5171eeb0df3753" alt="baltec1 baltec1"
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13656
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 18:22:00 -
[519] - Quote
Sbrodor wrote:Aram Kachaturian wrote:I checked all your killboards one by one, killmail by killmail and as I thought a large part of you has no ******* idea how bombing worked prior to 2012 and didnt bomb intensively at all before and after.
You are just complaining to ruin CCP Fozzie weekend and that's not cool. http://oscurasimmetria.eve-kill.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=186748http://kb.yulaifederation.net/?a=corp_detail&crp_id=7476before 2012 u don't had the each-other damage of bombs so u can have clacking problem but u had only to manage a single volley. ccp will introduce a tons of nerf much more than "before 2012". and i think they buffed the bomber to allow people to use them so was a problem and a solution. if they now want to lower use of bombers they have to put the bomber difficult level between "prior 2012" and "now". with this feature we go in a new level of difficult much more than 2012. in prior 2012 u dont had: 12 sec flight smart bomb defense higher signature antibomber bubbles lower agility. damage each other bombs. this is the death.
I'm from a time when bombers were paper thin, bombs were utterly useless and they launched cruise missiles. They are far from useless after these changes. The only problem here is the same problem that every ship has after it gets changed, people cant think for themselves. In less than a month people will swap to using new bomber fits and tactics that others who can and do adapt to change will come up with and all will be well again. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b021/9b021329c5ae3fff1915172292225116e5349e8f" alt="ISD Ezwal ISD Ezwal"
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2492
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75894/75894e022d10054b0f81936c2341ab777bef6e6e" alt=""
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 18:24:00 -
[520] - Quote
Thread temporarily locked for some cleaning. ISD Ezwal Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7b8/5c7b83bbf2614c629d0b68f685a6c3571177af03" alt="Almethea Almethea"
Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
170
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 18:58:00 -
[521] - Quote
at this rate of nerf incoming, we should finish 2015 (yes next year) with all ship like 1HP and only civilian modules? WTS BPO : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=307169 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70555/70555a11aa1e055755c4290be7bcea8ac79d4278" alt="Lugh Crow-Slave Lugh Crow-Slave"
Lugh Crow-Slave
Guardians of the Morrigan
161
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 19:06:00 -
[522] - Quote
Almethea wrote:at this rate of nerf incoming, we should finish 2015 (yes next year) with all ship like 1HP and only civilian modules?
well that's a bit harsh what this nurf looks like is they got together talked about it and some people had a few good ideas so they implemented them however they forgot that each idea was independent so when implemented together it went over kill |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae18b/ae18bab3ec50fa89011dbdaac54abfbd023c8287" alt="Komi Toran Komi Toran"
Komi Toran
Paragon Trust The Bastion
316
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 19:23:00 -
[523] - Quote
Obil Que wrote:People bought PLEX at 400 People buy PLEX at 800 So it's established that you are clueless about basic economics. Unfortunately, this isn't the place for the course, and I don't see you offering to pay for a tutor. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e60e/2e60eed7639b2d9c0faff828e089040272eaa7dd" alt="Obil Que Obil Que"
Obil Que
Star Explorers Reckoning Star Alliance
177
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 20:06:00 -
[524] - Quote
Komi Toran wrote:Obil Que wrote:People bought PLEX at 400 People buy PLEX at 800 So it's established that you are clueless about basic economics. Unfortunately, this isn't the place for the course, and I don't see you offering to pay for a tutor.
You're the one claiming that touching ISB will crash the PLEX market
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0df4c/0df4c1c96e853fd85ab29d64d24419ff854e039c" alt="Alexis Nightwish Alexis Nightwish"
Alexis Nightwish
47
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 20:13:00 -
[525] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I'm from a time when bombers were paper thin, bombs were utterly useless and they launched cruise missiles. They are far from useless after these changes. The only problem here is the same problem that every ship has after it gets changed, people cant think for themselves. In less than a month people will swap to using new bomber fits and tactics that others who can and do adapt to change will come up with and all will be well again. Way less than a month. I already know what tactics will be used.
Also, this. Power Projection: A Brighter Future: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5115336 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e3f8/8e3f8ce89fb370bc728ccf5d8808d8282242c2f8" alt="Arsine Mayhem Arsine Mayhem"
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
330
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 20:32:00 -
[526] - Quote
Lord Xyon wrote:
The cloak thing does nothing to an isboxer fleet it only harms everyone else. It harms PVP elsewhere and this stupid idea just generally pisses people off.
So by changing cloaking to somehow try to fix stealth bombers you affect the entire gameplay of: Recon Ships Strategic Cruisers Covert Ops Frigates Expedition Frigates Transport Ships Some Faction Cruisers Some Faction Frigates And then Stealth bombers
Someone in NULL tears up about losing a few ships. Fozzie to the rescue. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d39d7/d39d76b8ba0381dd5cfe1365b92b1b62d27f067b" alt="afkalt afkalt"
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
390
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 20:53:00 -
[527] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: New 10km Dictor Bubbles:
Are these half the size (m3) of the others? |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d0c8/3d0c82bfca81d01c8b6dd196c75e70918076ff77" alt="Ghaustyl Kathix Ghaustyl Kathix"
Ghaustyl Kathix
Rising Thunder
30
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 21:35:00 -
[528] - Quote
Arsine Mayhem wrote:Fozzie to the rescue. Actually, one of the CSM members said that most of these changes were proposed by the CSM members themselves. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cb7/61cb7017c2ca2d0f7be17aaf9990461b1aa024a8" alt="P"
While you guys are changing stealth bombers, can you switch the Purifier to use the Tormentor hull instead of the Inquisitor? It makes no sense as-is, since the others are based off of combat frigates (Kestrel>Manticore, Tristan>Nemesis, Breacher>Hound) while the Amarr bomber's based off of the logi frigate. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc560/dc560c518c651fae151a31bd26b3c679180b1d96" alt="FunGu Arsten FunGu Arsten"
FunGu Arsten
Fungu .Inc
22
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:02:00 -
[529] - Quote
lol at cloak changes...
good job removing all competition, in favor of multiboxers.. less real people doing bomber runs - less standard anti-bomberfittings - more tears when i warp
box 1 warp to 0 - box 2 warp to 10 - box 3 warp to 20 - etc... does anyone play this game when changes are beeing proposed... or is it still listening to the biggest whiners first?
** CCP you are making multiboxer fleets stronger! Thank you ** |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e3f8/8e3f8ce89fb370bc728ccf5d8808d8282242c2f8" alt="Arsine Mayhem Arsine Mayhem"
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
331
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:03:00 -
[530] - Quote
Ghaustyl Kathix wrote:Arsine Mayhem wrote:Fozzie to the rescue. Actually, one of the CSM members said that most of these changes were proposed by the CSM members themselves. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61cb7/61cb7017c2ca2d0f7be17aaf9990461b1aa024a8" alt="P"
Oh yea, DEV's taking the advise of a few self serving CSM's.
That will make the game better. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de015/de015025eea1bf219a1f1cdf622baa46b2b59fb9" alt="Momiji Sakora Momiji Sakora"
Momiji Sakora
Omni Galactic
32
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:15:00 -
[531] - Quote
progodlegend wrote:Mike Azariah wrote: Those who argue that bombers are the counter to n+1 . . . really? The big groups are precluded from flying them and I wasn't told? Bombers are a way to make a fleet nervous and allows the little guy to punch above his weight, agreed. But do not try to tell me that the blobs cannot just as easily field the bombers
I've been bombed by a 100 man bomber fleet before. It sucks, we were low sig and armor tanked :(. I would pay to see the video of 100 bombs going off on a fleet, 10-20 bombs already looks amazing :D |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bdd/77bdd88a9dc9803a73f144e5456aa8bd32c49e74" alt="Mike Azariah Mike Azariah"
Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1697
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:28:00 -
[532] - Quote
as said before, 100 bombs will self annihilate
but wing after wing. . . we will darken the skies with our bombers---and you will DIE in the shade
That aside, may I ask if there are any more things I should add to my summary?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5022/c5022b71c9edf899caa598a80662803165974bbd" alt="elitatwo elitatwo"
elitatwo
Congregatio
366
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:34:00 -
[533] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I'm from a time when bombers were paper thin, bombs were utterly useless and they launched cruise missiles. They are far from useless after these changes. The only problem here is the same problem that every ship has after it gets changed, people cant think for themselves. In less than a month people will swap to using new bomber fits and tactics that others who can and do adapt to change will come up with and all will be well again.
Sorry but me too.
Back in the day the Manticore was the only stealth bomber worth flying. The rest of them were not even considered. And none of them could fit a 100 million (that is no joke!) covert ops cloak.
I'll let you in on a secret, the only reason why the Manticore was the best stealth bomber in 2006 was that the Manticore had cruise missiles without missile launcher tracking nonsense.
Another big revelation of the past and the end of daze coming from the missiles without tracking nonsense from the past.
(Guess what I was telling the truth all along, even without exile and smoothsayer and a drop of mindflood in my quafe..)
The other bombers used turrets - battleship turrets like the Talos, Nage, tornado and Oracle do.
They did get a speed buff from using the improved tech II cloak and were fit with....
surprise!!!! Sensor dampeners!!
The covert ops cloak came years later and even in 2006 somehow people were able to not decloak themselves. It only seems impossible to do again after two years data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe8d0/fe8d058d1cf8593a43ff6ea1126642dc6b1cd1e3" alt="Roll" signature |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e3f8/8e3f8ce89fb370bc728ccf5d8808d8282242c2f8" alt="Arsine Mayhem Arsine Mayhem"
Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
331
|
Posted - 2014.10.17 22:41:00 -
[534] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:as said before, 100 bombs will self annihilate
but wing after wing. . . we will darken the skies with our bombers---and you will DIE in the shade
That aside, may I ask if there are any more things I should add to my summary?
m
Remove bombers from the game, leave cloaking alone.
Make tear bears ships immune to damage so we don't have to hear the crying of little girls anymore.
Because that is all this is about. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2991/e29913f2c75a65bd3e7e776b18fcffb2374b8fbb" alt="Byson1 Byson1"
Byson1
Zan Industries ZADA ALLIANCE
9
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 00:45:00 -
[535] - Quote
is there any communication between the guys deciding to screw with mechanics? Is there really a good reason this should even happen. or is it just to screw with people? I think people working for ccp who play the game should not be allowed to make such decisions. I don't believe they are impartial. There needs to be an audit to see who these changes will help the most. Who in CCP? then fire that person.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70555/70555a11aa1e055755c4290be7bcea8ac79d4278" alt="Lugh Crow-Slave Lugh Crow-Slave"
Lugh Crow-Slave
Guardians of the Morrigan
162
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 00:48:00 -
[536] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:as said before, 100 bombs will self annihilate
but wing after wing. . . we will darken the skies with our bombers---and you will DIE in the shade
That aside, may I ask if there are any more things I should add to my summary?
m i would like it if the new bomb was looked at in regards to carriers and dreads either by making triage/siege immune(or resistance) to the cap void (thus they can be used to force carriers into triage) or see if anything can be done to batteries to up their nuet resistance to a point that this module is worth using over recharges.
but asit stands a small WH group will be to strongly affected by this bomb |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e484/1e484feeb8823e5c0782190803a3ce30265a9182" alt="Gantz Vendetta Gantz Vendetta"
Gantz Vendetta
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 00:48:00 -
[537] - Quote
Im sure its been said before but TLDR.
I am a fairly poor PvPer trying to get into the role of the solo bomber, and as it stands I have enough troubles just surviving, let along landing a bomb, let alone that bomb doing pathetic damage, let alone warping out after a bomb, let alone etc etc.
Why make something that is so hard to be fully succesful at even harder? Surely there is a way to target mid to large bomber fleets without completely ruining the ship in its entirety.
Nerfing bomb damage, then giving more bombs and faster fire rate is hardly fair. Not to mention the fact that bombs do such pathetic damage already.
I dont know what more to say than if this does go ahead i would like a refund on all bomber related skills, including covert ops and torps.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2449a/2449a1fcaa93e64892bdfee6bea802aad375f3ef" alt="Hal Lubbert Hal Lubbert"
Hal Lubbert
Body Snatchers
1
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 00:56:00 -
[538] - Quote
Gantz Vendetta wrote:Im sure its been said before but TLDR.
I am a fairly poor PvPer trying to get into the role of the solo bomber, and as it stands I have enough troubles just surviving, let along landing a bomb, let alone that bomb doing pathetic damage, let alone warping out after a bomb, let alone etc etc.
Why make something that is so hard to be fully succesful at even harder? Surely there is a way to target mid to large bomber fleets without completely ruining the ship in its entirety.
Nerfing bomb damage, then giving more bombs and faster fire rate is hardly fair. Not to mention the fact that bombs do such pathetic damage already.
I dont know what more to say than if this does go ahead i would like a refund on all bomber related skills, including covert ops and torps.
I agree with what he said !!! |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57839/578393be1a4f6e4d275cc4ba81922103a466e2c7" alt="Seraph IX Basarab Seraph IX Basarab"
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
446
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 01:22:00 -
[539] - Quote
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1410/IBombers.png
This. Hades Effect /-áConflict Resolution /-áPirate Protection |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bdd/77bdd88a9dc9803a73f144e5456aa8bd32c49e74" alt="Mike Azariah Mike Azariah"
Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
1698
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 01:33:00 -
[540] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/1410/IBombers.png
This.
Nice graphic, the only issue I have with it is when do they cloak? If (btw has this little gem been confirmed?) they can be decloaked in warp if they are in the same warp bubble would they all have to space out ahead of time or would they cycle in?
m
Mike Azariah-á CSM8 and now CSM9 |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 30 .. 37 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |