EVE Search - Remove local for 0.0 !!

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Remove local for 0.0 !!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Elmicker The Phoenix Rising FreeFall Securities	Posted - 2007.09.20 14:58:00 - [301] Still-warm necro. Sexy.
Nicho Void Gallente Hyper-Nova	Posted - 2007.09.20 15:05:00 - [302] Originally by: SiJira exactly Just when I thought your forum posting couldn't sink any lower, you bump your month old thread with the reply, "exactly". You are a cancer. ---------------
SiJira	Posted - 2007.09.20 15:12:00 - [303] Originally by: Nicho Void Originally by: SiJira exactly Just when I thought your forum posting couldn't sink any lower, you bump your month old thread with the reply, "exactly". You are a cancer. its a relative issue with a thread full of informed posts people like you complain just because they can and i would rather have a large thread then 15 smaller ones thanks now dont post if you dont like and thank you for bumping ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Nicho Void Gallente Hyper-Nova	Posted - 2007.09.20 15:25:00 - [304] Originally by: SiJira its a relative issue with a thread full of informed posts Informed posts except for every one made by you and those who are sick of your antics. You spam this forum with half thought out, self serving ideas that do nothing but get you flamed. And yet you keep posting. Originally by: SiJira i would rather have a large thread then 15 smaller ones Wrong. You would rather have a large thread with YOUR NAME in the creator column. ---------------
SiJira	Posted - 2007.09.20 15:27:00 - [305] thanks for the bump anyways the constellation idea is looking real good as long as it doesnt automatically show who is who ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:32:00 - [306] with the new covert ops local needs to change read the OP to understand before you whine ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Cailais Amarr VITOC Fang Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:35:00 - [307] SiJira, From my thread on improving low sec (see link in sig): Introducing - The Fog of War. Without the capabilities of Empire maintained communication relays your ships awareness its inceasingly mutted in Low Sec. This works by degrading your local scan range - in 1.0 space you see in local everyone within 100AU (99% of a system), in 0.9 this drops to 90AU and so on until 0.1 systems are down to 10AU radius for Local Intell. Its a compramise Id admit, but a workable one imho. C. - sig designer - eve mail Low Sec Idea
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:41:00 - [308] Originally by: Cailais SiJira, From my thread on improving low sec (see link in sig): Introducing - The Fog of War. Without the capabilities of Empire maintained communication relays your ships awareness its inceasingly mutted in Low Sec. This works by degrading your local scan range - in 1.0 space you see in local everyone within 100AU (99% of a system), in 0.9 this drops to 90AU and so on until 0.1 systems are down to 10AU radius for Local Intell. Its a compramise Id admit, but a workable one imho. C. i agree that the changes need to come in small increments and something like that would be one of the first steps ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Ivor Gunn No One Expects The Spanish Inquisition	Posted - 2007.10.27 21:56:00 - [309] Necro'd twice. It's dead, jim.
Cailais Amarr VITOC Fang Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.27 22:17:00 - [310] Originally by: SiJira Originally by: Cailais SiJira, From my thread on improving low sec (see link in sig): Introducing - The Fog of War. Without the capabilities of Empire maintained communication relays your ships awareness its inceasingly mutted in Low Sec. This works by degrading your local scan range - in 1.0 space you see in local everyone within 100AU (99% of a system), in 0.9 this drops to 90AU and so on until 0.1 systems are down to 10AU radius for Local Intell. Its a compramise Id admit, but a workable one imho. C. i agree that the changes need to come in small increments and something like that would be one of the first steps And probably the last. Scaling local intel is logical when laid alongside the Sec Status of a system. Removing local in its entirety would ultimately have negative effects upon the 'social' aspect of EVE. Constellation Chat channels wouldn't cover it, as we are as a species more able to assimilate social contact through proximity. No local is a bad idea; limiting local in a scaled fashion makes sense instinctively - like moving from a light filled corridor into increasing darkness. C. *signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) - sig designer - eve mail Low Sec Idea
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.27 22:39:00 - [311] Originally by: Cailais Originally by: SiJira Originally by: Cailais SiJira, From my thread on improving low sec (see link in sig): Introducing - The Fog of War. Without the capabilities of Empire maintained communication relays your ships awareness its inceasingly mutted in Low Sec. This works by degrading your local scan range - in 1.0 space you see in local everyone within 100AU (99% of a system), in 0.9 this drops to 90AU and so on until 0.1 systems are down to 10AU radius for Local Intell. Its a compramise Id admit, but a workable one imho. C. i agree that the changes need to come in small increments and something like that would be one of the first steps And probably the last. Scaling local intel is logical when laid alongside the Sec Status of a system. Removing local in its entirety would ultimately have negative effects upon the 'social' aspect of EVE. Constellation Chat channels wouldn't cover it, as we are as a species more able to assimilate social contact through proximity. No local is a bad idea; limiting local in a scaled fashion makes sense instinctively - like moving from a light filled corridor into increasing darkness. C. come now read the op the local is still there it just doesnt do what the current local does, subsequent posts describe how an alliance would be able to fit something to their stations to allow for the local we have now hence giving a real backwater feel to all the uninhabited 0.0 ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
Cailais Amarr VITOC Fang Alliance	Posted - 2007.10.28 00:03:00 - [312] Edited by: Cailais on 28/10/2007 00:05:20 With that system noone would utter a word in local and then the points I mention would apply (social interaction, etc). Edit: having said that, Ive just realised that you are refering to 0.0 only in your OP. My system is exactly the same, it just spreads out across Eve in varying degrees of intensity. I would argue that cloaks would need to be scannable however under such a system: they would be to advantaged otherwise in many situations. C. *signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link) - Jacques([email protected]) - sig d
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.28 00:28:00 - [313] Originally by: Cailais Edited by: Cailais on 28/10/2007 00:05:20 With that system noone would utter a word in local and then the points I mention would apply (social interaction, etc). Edit: having said that, Ive just realised that you are refering to 0.0 only in your OP. My system is exactly the same, it just spreads out across Eve in varying degrees of intensity. I would argue that cloaks would need to be scannable however under such a system: they would be to advantaged otherwise in many situations. C. none of the cloaks need to be detected more than they can be right now - definitely not by just scanning i dont see your point against social interaction - theres no prevention of it with my system if someone wants to talk they can ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem
SiJira	Posted - 2007.10.31 01:46:00 - [314] when 0.0 is completely hostile to each player that is not in his own alliances sovereignty eve will be able to boast more about its greatness until then this part of the advertising is false and misleading ____ __ ________ _sig below_ devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried! _lies above_ CCP Morpheus was here Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn [yellow]Kaem

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] [11]:: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.