Originally by: Chip2k3

---

if you dont ever post then why do you have a forum sig?

---

Originally by: Dalilia Emeraldfire

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

if you dont ever post then why do you have a forum sig?

---

Actually, he said he has never created a thread. He didn't say he never posted.

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone?

---

Originally by: SirMolle

---

Excuse me? BoB slave corp?

k, if thats what you wish, you just got your wish granted. Forever.

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone?

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone?

---

Originally by: Enochia Starr

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone?

---

your kidding right

---

Originally by: Enochia Starr

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

hmmmm, it's all IAC that cant login, BoB seem fine? dev h4x theories anyone?

---

your kidding right

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

There is no fight. No one can reload weapons. Epic Fail on CCP's part.

---

Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk

---

I don't think anyone doomsdayed

---

Originally by: xBlood

---

Sucks dudes.

Question: are capitals involved in any form?

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

God ya gotta lol at the morons who think you can get 600 people in 1 system and have no lag. Ya dont like it then briong 50 V 50 only asshats

---

Originally by: xBlood

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

God ya gotta lol at the morons who think you can get 600 people in 1 system and have no lag. Ya dont like it then briong 50 V 50 only asshats

---

Is this like...the 5th time you've trolled in one thread? gotta be a record

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Originally by: xBlood

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

God ya gotta lol at the morons who think you can get 600 people in 1 system and have no lag. Ya dont like it then briong 50 V 50 only asshats

---

Is this like...the 5th time you've trolled in one thread? gotta be a record

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Thats what I said and got called a troll! :'(

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Originally by: Isabel Sweet

---

we need more hamsters

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Yep, what a good ******* idea. Tell 98% of your alliance they're not allowed to ******* help defend their home. Good ******* idea! Why didn't anyone else ******* think of this!

Phear meh for #1 Dev.

---

i see a lot of stars bitter?

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Yep, what a good ******* idea. Tell 98% of your alliance they're not allowed to ******* help defend their home. Good ******* idea! Why didn't anyone else ******* think of this!

Phear meh for #1 Dev.

---

i see a lot of stars bitter?

---

Me? Bitter? Na. As some forum alt above just sayed, Mc and BoB only managed to kill one PoS out of the 11 that came out over the past two days. I'm just sad we didn't get to completely *****their capital fleet because no one could reload.

I guess you could say I am bitter?

---

Originally by: Evil Thug

---

...is barely possible due to imbalanced location agents. We managed to get bob only twice with login trap...

---

Originally by: jernej

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Yep, what a good ******* idea. Tell 98% of your alliance they're not allowed to ******* help defend their home. Good ******* idea! Why didn't anyone else ******* think of this!

Phear meh for #1 Dev.

---

i see a lot of stars bitter?

---

Me? Bitter? Na. As some forum alt above just sayed, Mc and BoB only managed to kill one PoS out of the 11 that came out over the past two days. I'm just sad we didn't get to completely *****their capital fleet because no one could reload.

I guess you could say I am bitter?

---

We didn't reload either. We only used amarr ships. Nerf amarr.

Oh and I think I pwned tempest at some point, but mail didn't load yet

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

here's an idea.. dont put almost 700 people and ships in a single system.
\
ccp doesnt have to and shouldnt do a dam thing to help you. its your fault ya jump into it. everyone knows jita lags..

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Originally by: Peroptris

---

for the idiot who stated that its the fleets involved fault for bringing blobs how exactly do u plan for this game to work?
We all agree blobbing isnt much fun and causes huge lag BUT simply saying dont bring blobs is ridiculous...ok lets all just sit here and twiddle our thumbs because u cant take down pos with small numbers and u cant expect the defenders to just go oh damn u guys were here first with ur gang we wont out blob u.
How is 100 people limit going to work? all the major alliances can now bring 100 pilots easily so all they need to do is keep their system full when pos come out of reinforced and they are 100% safe because hostiles cant get in due limit.
Blobs suck, blobs cause lag but rite now because ccp hasnt got a server that can handle them AND they havent come up with a way to make blobs less necessary IT IS 100% their problem and fault.
Blaming bob, iac, goons, whoever is idiocy. they are playing the cards ccp dealt them.

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!

---

Originally by: Peroptris

---

for the idiot who stated that its the fleets involved fault for bringing blobs how exactly do u plan for this game to work?
We all agree blobbing isnt much fun and causes huge lag BUT simply saying dont bring blobs is ridiculous...ok lets all just sit here and twiddle our thumbs because u cant take down pos with small numbers and u cant expect the defenders to just go oh damn u guys were here first with ur gang we wont out blob u.
How is 100 people limit going to work? all the major alliances can now bring 100 pilots easily so all they need to do is keep their system full when pos come out of reinforced and they are 100% safe because hostiles cant get in due limit.
Blobs suck, blobs cause lag but rite now because ccp hasnt got a server that can handle them AND they havent come up with a way to make blobs less necessary IT IS 100% their problem and fault.
Blaming bob, iac, goons, whoever is idiocy. they are playing the cards ccp dealt them.

---

Originally by: Gontard

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!

---

All your alliance is as ******** as you ?

---

Originally by: Silvestri

---

Originally by: Gontard

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!

---

All your alliance is as ******** as you ?

---

I'm guessing the word that is bleaped out is....... hungover?? Do I win?

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

Originally by: Validor

---

cap ships involved?

you tell me.

Linkage

and

Linkage

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Edited by: Nlewis on 03/10/2007 19:42:01

Originally by: Silvestri

---

Originally by: Gontard

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!

---

All your alliance is as ******** as you ?

---

I'm guessing the word that is bleaped out is....... hungover?? Do I win?

---

if you hit quote you can see what they said. but your answer is much more fitting

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

what

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

suddenly you think your special for wanting to kill a pos or fleet..and deserve a special favor?

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Edited by: Nlewis on 03/10/2007 19:42:01

Originally by: Silvestri

---

Originally by: Gontard

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!

---

All your alliance is as ******** as you ?

---

I'm guessing the word that is bleaped out is....... hungover?? Do I win?

---

if you hit quote you can see what they said. but your answer is much more fitting

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

umm
actually i have core quad 6600(o/c up to 3Mhz) and 10Mbit (both in and out) internet connection.
please dont tell me about my connectivity and hardware :)

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

Originally by: Maximus Maridius

---

MY GOD! ITS A MIRACLE!

NO GOON POSTS!

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

umm
actually i have core quad 6600(o/c up to 3Mhz) and 10Mbit (both in and out) internet connection.
please dont tell me about my connectivity and hardware :)

---

Originally by: Zyta Eke

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

suddenly you think your special for wanting to kill a pos or fleet..and deserve a special favor?

---

What do you expect BoB and IAC to do? Get together and agree to bring 50 people each for a POS killing?

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

what

---

Less pixels = less effort

---

Originally by: xBlood

---

I think some people want eve to be like:

'After you old chap.'
'Not at all dear sir, you first'
'What jolly good weather'
etc etc.

Fact is...blobs are needed to defend and to attack. The end.

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

umm
actually i have core quad 6600(o/c up to 3Mhz) and 10Mbit (both in and out) internet connection.
please dont tell me about my connectivity and hardware :)

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

"blah blah - pyramid quote style spam - more idiotic comments - more pyramid quote style spam. "

---

Originally by: Validor

---

Linkage

---

Originally by: Groox

---

Originally by: Validor

---

Linkage

---

Look at the local count # - can't be go(o)d

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

what

---

Less pixels = less effort

---

please cite some sources

---

Originally by: Optical Nerve

---

I can't describe the fustration about this game when involving alliance vs. alliance clashes. Why did they in CCP even bother to create such into the game when this clearly doesn't work in practice.

Can't you guys at CCP focus on performance now for a while. Buy some epic computing hardware just to house these kinds of 500+ clashes of players?

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Optical Nerve

---

I can't describe the fustration about this game when involving alliance vs. alliance clashes. Why did they in CCP even bother to create such into the game when this clearly doesn't work in practice.

Can't you guys at CCP focus on performance now for a while. Buy some epic computing hardware just to house these kinds of 500+ clashes of players?

---

I think that I have read that the new engine supposedly will be optimized when it comes to sending info back and forth to the server reducing server load. So if this is correct and it actually will do that, then all this **** may be over with shortly

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

2x AA will render at twice the size and scale it down, giving it smoother edges. 6x AA does the same at 6x etc.

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

how's the battle goin'?

post sum pics

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Boomershoot

---

how's the battle goin'?

post sum pics

---

It ended a half hour ago

---

Quote:

---

CCP should have designed a game in such a way that you didnt NEED a local of 700 to take or defend a system.
So yes its ALL CCP faults.

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

what

---

Less pixels = less effort

---

please cite some sources

---

Well logically, the fewer pixels there are being told to do things, the less strain it will put on hardware. Running at that resolution on your "core quad 6600(o/c up to 3Mhz)" is going to take more effort than running a resolution which is lower. This is also why Anti-Aliasing reduces FPS - 2x AA will render at twice the size and scale it down, giving it smoother edges. 6x AA does the same at 6x etc.

And if you do have a Core[b]2[b]Quad 6600, overclocked to 3mhz (lol, I'll overlook this and assume you meant Ghz Underclocking ftw), why not record at full size? Fraps will run at more or less the same speed at that size, due to load being shifted to a different core.
Just fyi, I run a core2quad and frapsed that entire 'fight' at full resolution with max effects on, 6x AA, 16x AF and zoomed in quite often, getting 10 - 20 fps.

Kay

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

Why on earth with BoB+allies tied up in FAT, goons haven't swarmed into Bob homespace and started attempting to drop cyno jammers or reinforce POS instead of putting even more ships into an already overloaded system.

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

I don't know any MMO thats capable of dealing with such a stupid number of players in one place.

Why on earth with BoB+allies tied up in FAT, goons haven't swarmed into Bob homespace and started attempting to drop cyno jammers or reinforce POS instead of putting even more ships into an already overloaded system.

Honestly is there a reason why it makes more sence to Lag FAT that potentially draw BoB back to their homespace?

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it

I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason

---

Originally by: Dhip C

---

There is a known issue with EVE client and newer cards, the GPU will heat up to about 75 degrees unless you change a setting in your prefs.ini.

See the Known issue forums.

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

Why on earth with BoB+allies tied up in FAT, goons haven't swarmed into Bob homespace and started attempting to drop cyno jammers or reinforce POS instead of putting even more ships into an already overloaded system.

---

Quote:

---

Honestly is there a reason why it makes more sence to Lag FAT that potentially draw BoB back to their homespace?

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

I don't know any MMO thats capable of dealing with such a stupid number of players in one place.

Why on earth with BoB+allies tied up in FAT, goons haven't swarmed into Bob homespace and started attempting to drop cyno jammers or reinforce POS instead of putting even more ships into an already overloaded system.

Honestly is there a reason why it makes more sence to Lag FAT that potentially draw BoB back to their homespace?

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

---

Originally by: Xrensa

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

...

---

We don't sell out our friends for personal gains. BoB has and always will. That's the difference.

---

Originally by: Caldari citizen40

---

Originally by: Xrensa

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

...

---

We don't sell out our friends for personal gains. BoB has and always will. That's the difference.

---

Of course not, you only use them for personal gains.. oh no that is the same!! :)

---

Originally by: bulabuba

---

If it came down to a contest of pure pvp skill, tactics, and strategy, I don't think even the Goons could delude themselves into thinking they'd have much of a chance against MC and BoB.

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it

I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason

---

/cuts the quote-pyramid

Anyway

"1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768."
Lawl wtf? It will run slower at a higher resolution, just not noticeably slower. Besides, 1280x800 isn't a widescreen resolution, just a wide aspect ratio. The original res of that video, by doubling the half-size res, is 1680x1048. That's 1.7 million pixels, as opposed to 1024x768 / 1280x800 running at under 1 million. 70% more pixels to render makes no difference?

---

Originally by: Carnmire

---

So the mighty BoB war machine is averaging 1 POS down every two weeks or so? I guess theyre aiming for early '08 sov in FAT.

---

Originally by: Darcuese

---

Edited by: Darcuese on 03/10/2007 20:54:32

Originally by: Carnmire

---

So the mighty BoB war machine is averaging 1 POS down every two weeks or so? I guess theyre aiming for early '08 sov in FAT.

---

this is about lag and particular fight, no?
Sry, i might be wrong. Im sure there are plenty of other threads regarding speed of taking poses down.

But, then again, i guess you just randomly enter a thread and paste something

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it

I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason

---

/cuts the quote-pyramid

Anyway

"1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768."
Lawl wtf? It will run slower at a higher resolution, just not noticeably slower. Besides, 1280x800 isn't a widescreen resolution, just a wide aspect ratio. The original res of that video, by doubling the half-size res, is 1680x1048. That's 1.7 million pixels, as opposed to 1024x768 / 1280x800 running at under 1 million. 70% more pixels to render makes no difference?

---

any other game and I agree with you but we are talking about eve

---

Originally by: Kara Ivanova

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768 in eve. sure you could use full graphics during that fight, eve currently does not use your graphics card and you have a good processor. this has nothing to do with widescreen over non-widescreen. Even with AA and AF running with(outside of) eve, it still shouldn't make much of a difference performance wise since your graphics card already has little to no load put onto it

I tried to edit this into my other post but it wouldn't work for some reason

---

/cuts the quote-pyramid

Anyway

"1280x1024 has more pixels than 1280x800 and doesn't run any different than 1024x768."
Lawl wtf? It will run slower at a higher resolution, just not noticeably slower. Besides, 1280x800 isn't a widescreen resolution, just a wide aspect ratio. The original res of that video, by doubling the half-size res, is 1680x1048. That's 1.7 million pixels, as opposed to 1024x768 / 1280x800 running at under 1 million. 70% more pixels to render makes no difference?

---

any other game and I agree with you but we are talking about eve

---

Any idea how badly you just failed?

---

Originally by: Ms Tolarri

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

You really shouldn't be running a Widescreen monitor with a single-core CPU. It will kill your performance.

---

Originally by: Validor

---

cap ships involved?

you tell me.

Linkage

and

Linkage

---

Originally by: Ztrain

---

More Dots more Dots!!! Lag does the killboard good.

Z

---

Originally by: CCP Atropos

---

Personally I think Amarr ships should consume slaves in a similar way that other ships consume ammunition.

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

why? I have switched between 1280x1024 and 1024x768 many times and I have noticed no difference whatsoever

---

Originally by: Wainak

---

SERVER IS WORKING FINE! NO LAG @ ALL!

---

Originally by: Gnulpie

---

Originally by: Ztrain

---

More Dots more Dots!!! Lag does the killboard good.

Z

---

Hehe

I wonder though if you will say the same when your next titan goes down

I can't really imagine that any mature player can enjoy that lag. Shooting ships that are lagged out or desynced?

How exciting *yawns*

---

Originally by: Darcuese

---

its my fault tbh

---

Originally by: Winters Chill

---

So...who won

/popcorn

*munch*munch*

---

Originally by: Pilk

---

Noob talking smack
--P

---

Originally by: Bluebear8

---

But, of course we have lag in FAT.

BoB told all its friends they have to appear today or face a rental increase.

IAC told all its members ... FREE DRINKS!




EPIC battles ... deserve EPIC posts ...

You all know, CCP planned it this way... While you wait to relog, you should enjoy this thread to find out who is winning today's FORUM battle!

---

Originally by: bulabuba

---

Originally by: Hummer H3

---

Why on earth with BoB+allies tied up in FAT, goons haven't swarmed into Bob homespace and started attempting to drop cyno jammers or reinforce POS instead of putting even more ships into an already overloaded system.

---

Because overloading a system to the point where it lags out and dies works for them. It's the tactic they've been using for at least a year now. Where have you been?

Quote:

---

Honestly is there a reason why it makes more sence to Lag FAT that potentially draw BoB back to their homespace?

---

Yep, there is a reason. Lagging a system out makes winning and losing more of a crapshoot, and tends to favor the force that had the most people in a system at the time the node died. You can expect to see Goons do this every time the Russians look like they might be in trouble. Why does it make sense? Because, again, it works for them, and has been working for over a year now. The unhappy state of the game is that either side will do what it takes to win, whether that means playing the game, or playing the game mechanics and server limitations.

If it came down to a contest of pure pvp skill, tactics, and strategy, I don't think even the Goons could delude themselves into thinking they'd have much of a chance against MC and BoB. Fortunately for them, it doesn't.

---

Originally by: Darcuese

---

Edited by: Darcuese on 03/10/2007 20:54:32

Originally by: Carnmire

---

So the mighty BoB war machine is averaging 1 POS down every two weeks or so? I guess theyre aiming for early '08 sov in FAT.

---

this is about lag and particular fight, no?
Sry, i might be wrong. Im sure there are plenty of other threads regarding speed of taking poses down.

But, then again, i guess you just randomly enter a thread and paste something

---

Originally by: Kara Ivanova

---

Did you go from 1 frame / minute to one frame / 50 seconds then?

Seriously, there is a difference. Like Mrs T said, sometimes it's barely noticeable, but you're trying to challenge cold hard fact

---

Originally by: Dawn Razor

---

Then I shut down the game and watched the movie "Sunshine" by Danny Boyle. A really good movie, I¦d recommend it to any scifi fans...it¦s in the same vein as Event Horizon, slightly less gory and a bit more intelligent maybe.

---

Originally by: Orangir

---

Originally by: Kara Ivanova

---

Did you go from 1 frame / minute to one frame / 50 seconds then?

Seriously, there is a difference. Like Mrs T said, sometimes it's barely noticeable, but you're trying to challenge cold hard fact

---

No, there isn't a difference. EVE offloads most graphics processing to the CPU rather than the GPU. Increasing the load on the GPU won't make a difference because your framerate is being limited by the CPU already. It'd be like running Bioshock with an 8800 and a Pentium 3, increasing AA and AF won't lower your framerates because your CPU will be choking and lowering your framerates on even the lowest settings.

---

Originally by: Phear meh

---

imo just allow 100 people tops in a system.. this old crap of blob warfare is just sickning. lrn2play

---

Originally by: Hellaciouss

---

You know, I keep seeing you smack all over the forums, so I asked myself, "Who are these AXE guys? They must be pretty big to be giving out advice like this". So I looked at the Sov map and tried to find Axiom Empire somewhere. For some reason they were not listed in the Sov tab and thought "that can't be possible for the amount of smack I read from this Pilk guy", so I went online and found this well known website and yet it shows them as having no space anywhere.

Talk about worthless. Obviously both the Sov map in-game and the sov statistics on that site are out of date, right guys? ..right? .....guys?

---

Originally by: Lucy Liusius

---

sad really to see them where they are to day

---

Originally by: Kara Ivanova

---

Do you not realise that a GPU is just a CPU in disguise, haxx0red to make it solely for graphics processing?

I wasn't saying anything about AA and AF increasing / decreasing framerate, so why did you even bring that into the equation? Increasing the number of pixels to change every frame makes the CPU (which, as Eve is pretty crappily programmed, and does all of its graphics rendering on the CPU (AA and AF don't count as theyre programmed externally with graphics drivers) work harder to do so, thus reducing framerate.

---

Originally by: Pilk

---

We'll win the battle because we know how to fit ships so that they're a boon to our effectiveness, not a liability.
--P

---

Originally by: Lucy Liusius

---

Hell my friend , calm down

AXE was once with the good guys , actually helped fight MC with IAC way back in the day ...

sad really to see them where they are to day

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

Originally by: Lucy Liusius

---

Hell my friend , calm down

AXE was once with the good guys , actually helped fight MC with IAC way back in the day ...

sad really to see them where they are to day

---

The good guys!??
what are the bad guys doing that is so bad? and vv


personally, i think a "minority" in goonswarm are the real badguys

---

Originally by: Anton Marx

---

Btw Pilk, for some reason, I have always wondered if you're a girl in RL?

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

i see. but you started the war!

AAA actually started the war against AXE when they were in Impass a while back.

So IAC/AAA are the badguys here

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

one group - full of happy drunks. who whine(get the pun?) and moan about lag when losing and brag and chest beat if they win

another group - full of people who have declared they have two purposes
1 take over all 0.0 and empire
2 exterminate a certain ethnic group from new eden.


you do the math - who is good and who is evil.

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

The good guys!??
what are the bad guys doing that is so bad? and vv

personally, i think a "minority" in goonswarm are the real badguys

---

Originally by: Galgarak

---

Edited by: Galgarak on 03/10/2007 23:05:16

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

one group - full of happy drunks. who whine(get the pun?) and moan about lag when losing and brag and chest beat if they win

another group - full of people who have declared they have two purposes
1 take over all 0.0 and empire
2 exterminate a certain ethnic group from new eden.


you do the math - who is good and who is evil.

---

changed for you, i did the math, i guess it depends who you are sided with, however evil is a strong word to use over a game

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

i see. but you started the war!

AAA actually started the war against AXE when they were in Impass a while back.

So IAC/AAA are the badguys here

---

one group - full of happy drunks.

another group - full of people who have declared they have two purposes
1 take over all 0.0 and empire
2 exterminate a certain ethnic group from new eden.


you do the math - who is good and who is evil.


ps - below is what ethnic means.

1. pertaining to or characteristic of a people, esp. a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.
2.belonging to or deriving from the cultural, racial, religious, or linguistic traditions of a people or country: ethnic dances.
3.Obsolete. pagan; heathen.

---

Originally by: Chip2k3

---

Edited by: Chip2k3 on 03/10/2007 19:15:00
God ya gotta lol at the morons who think you can get 600 people in 1 system and have no lag. Ya dont like it then only bring 50 V 50 asshats

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

i see. but you started the war!

AAA actually started the war against AXE when they were in Impass a while back.

So IAC/AAA are the badguys here

---

one group - full of happy drunks.

another group - full of people who have declared they have two purposes
1 take over all 0.0 and empire
2 exterminate a certain ethnic group from new eden.


you do the math - who is good and who is evil.


ps - below is what ethnic means.

1. pertaining to or characteristic of a people, esp. a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.
2.belonging to or deriving from the cultural, racial, religious, or linguistic traditions of a people or country: ethnic dances.
3.Obsolete. pagan; heathen.

---

pff. taking over all of 0.0 isent possible. neither is controling empire.

read my post again regarding my argument.


ps. - below is what reading means

the cognitive process of understanding a written linguistic message; "he enjoys reading books"

a datum about some physical state that is presented to a user by a meter or similar instrument; "he could not believe the meter reading"; "the barometer gave clear indications of an approaching storm"

a particular interpretation or performance; "on that reading it was an insult"; "he was famous for his reading of Mozart"

written material intended to be read; "the teacher assigned new readings"; "he bought some reading material at the airport"

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

stuff....

what's that four letter word i'm looking for here...


edited: i notice you commented on 0.0, but not on the ethnic cleansing. hence, my definition served it's purpose. while yours was a vain attempt at trolling? mocking? boogering?

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

1. the four letter word is "read"

2. i edited

read why IAC/AAA are the badguys

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

1. the four letter word is "read"

2. i edited

read why IAC/AAA are the badguys

---

um, no, that's not the four letter word, but it starts with f and has the ale sound in it.

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

read

---

Quote:

---

Posting with an unidentified alt in this forum is prohibited. If you wish to participate in the discussions here, please be sure to have the "Show Corporation" and "Show Alliance" checkboxes ticked in your forum settings.

The term alt for the purpose of these rules also includes anybody in an NPC corp.

---

Quote:

---

Timmehh
Republic Military School

---

Originally by: Del369

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

i see. but you started the war!

AAA actually started the war against AXE when they were in Impass a while back.

So IAC/AAA are the badguys here

---

Nope, McFix invaded us not once but twice, in good christian stylee we let them slap both our cheeks before going for the nuts, i would link you to Seleenes leaked convo that goes in depth on it, but i can't be arsed

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

What? im not in any alliance.
and what is "alt"?

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

What? im not in any alliance.
and what is "alt"?

---

what you are posting with. post with your main

---

Originally by: Ezoran DuBlaidd

---

Originally by: Nlewis

---

Originally by: Timmehh

---

What? im not in any alliance.
and what is "alt"?

---

what you are posting with. post with your main

---

his alien ant overlords said, "NO" to that.

---

Originally by: Jogyn

---

After reading the whole thread i have some questions.

How many posses was killed and how many was saved?
How many caps did MCBOBFIX + comrades field and how many did IAAAC + rest field?
How many caps were lost?
How big support fleets were there and who was there except MCFIXBOB/IAAAC?
Whats the pos count in FAT?

Kinda sad that there is 7 pages of smack about a battle and no info at all.

---

1. 1 PoS was killed


2. 5 of 5 were saved yesterday, 5 of 6 were saved today


3. I think 2 or 3 Coalition Carriers were killed. No McBoB & Pet Cap loses I believe. Got 1 Dread to 30% hull but no one could reload ammo at that point and it lived.


4. Both fleets were pretty large (probably 200+ each not including capitals), no idea exactly how many different alliances were there.


5. Probably classified, or at least I ain't telling. IAC still hold Sov though

Originally by: Gungankllr

---

I think it's hilarious to see people try to complain about the server not being able to handle 700 people fighting at the same time.

---

Originally by: Jogyn

---

After reading the whole thread i have some questions.

How many posses was killed and how many was saved?
How many caps did MCBOBFIX + comrades field and how many did IAAAC + rest field?
How many caps were lost?
How big support fleets were there and who was there except MCFIXBOB/IAAAC?
Whats the pos count in FAT?

Kinda sad that there is 7 pages of smack about a battle and no info at all.

---

Originally by: Yaay

---

The best news of the day is the IAC contribution to BoB's war effort today... full story later.

We do appreciate the free stuff

---

Originally by: CaptainMiller

---

Originally by: Yaay

---

The best news of the day is the IAC contribution to BoB's war effort today... full story later.

We do appreciate the free stuff

---

---

Originally by: Gungankllr

---

I think it's hilarious to see people try to complain about the server not being able to handle 700 people fighting at the same time.

---

Originally by: Lazuran

---

Originally by: Gungankllr

---

I think it's hilarious to see people try to complain about the server not being able to handle 700 people fighting at the same time.

---

I think it is more hilarious to see people from small, insignificant alliances claiming that the game works as intended when it's broken for normal alliance warfare.

When CCP openly admits that EVE does not work for fights with more than XXX people in a system, then feel free to ridicule people who attempt to do that, but until then, how about you stop trolling.

---

Originally by: Kraken Sra'vik

---

Hmm, didn't CCP put a system cap on a BoB system that was invaded...

---

Originally by: Wigglytuff

---

Originally by: Kraken Sra'vik

---

Hmm, didn't CCP put a system cap on a BoB system that was invaded...

---

They've done it a few times, the specific Bob incident you're thinking of is likely when the coalition was going after a 'titan' that turned out to be a mothership, iirc they put the 700 player cap in place, and had they not, the other 2000 or so players from both sides trying to get there would've likely crashed the node, if not the server as a whole in the process.

Cap was also used when LV's baby titan was killed iirc.

---

Originally by: Wigglytuff

---

Originally by: Kraken Sra'vik

---

Hmm, didn't CCP put a system cap on a BoB system that was invaded...

---

They've done it a few times, the specific Bob incident you're thinking of is likely when the coalition was going after a 'titan' that turned out to be a mothership, iirc they put the 700 player cap in place, and had they not, the other 2000 or so players from both sides trying to get there would've likely crashed the node, if not the server as a whole in the process.

Cap was also used when LV's baby titan was killed iirc.

---

Originally by: Kraken Sra'vik

---

Originally by: Wigglytuff

---

Originally by: Kraken Sra'vik

---

Hmm, didn't CCP put a system cap on a BoB system that was invaded...

---

They've done it a few times, the specific Bob incident you're thinking of is likely when the coalition was going after a 'titan' that turned out to be a mothership, iirc they put the 700 player cap in place, and had they not, the other 2000 or so players from both sides trying to get there would've likely crashed the node, if not the server as a whole in the process.

Cap was also used when LV's baby titan was killed iirc.

---

Then, tbh, why don't they put one on FAT temporarily. It's not like this is going to get smaller.

---

Originally by: larietta

---

i had abit ov lag but not much i play will all effects off and graphics off eve looks some thing like this
Linkage

---

Originally by: Mynas Atoch

---

One killed, five saved. Notably, the only one killed was the only one that came out after the Alliance Euros got home from work.

---

Originally by: Karim alRashid

---

Originally by: Mynas Atoch

---

One killed, five saved. Notably, the only one killed was the only one that came out after the Alliance Euros got home from work.

---

Of course, they get reinforced only after IAC/AAA go to sleep.

What is your point ?

---

Originally by: Jonathan Peterbilt

---

In EVE, you know you failed and you depend on others when you start timing your life to one of the Russian time zones

---

Originally by: Jonathan Peterbilt

---

Originally by: Karim alRashid

---

Originally by: Mynas Atoch

---

One killed, five saved. Notably, the only one killed was the only one that came out after the Alliance Euros got home from work.

---

Of course, they get reinforced only after IAC/AAA go to sleep.

What is your point ?

---

In EVE, you know you failed and you depend on others when you start timing your life to one of the Russian time zones

---