Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Incantare
Caldari Kernel of War Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 06:26:00 -
[271]
Originally by: Undeadenemy
I don't care where you're from in real life. We don't get into that here.
You seemed to have the misconception I was french, as for "we don't get into that here" it's my choice to make entirely. Not that live there anyway.
Quote:
I was referring to your alliance. If you read the history of the Gallente, they are Tau Ceti Frenchmen.
Quote:
As for the comment about the south, you're the second one who has tried to bash Southerners. I in fact am a Southerner, but I don't know if you researched that fact or if you just assumed I was.
An educated guess.
Quote:
Either way, you're the one with a judgement problem
No. I only stoop as low as the person I'm talking to.
Quote: as I base my observations on what I see of TCF in-game, and how you behave. (ie: no nuts, run, run, run, except when its 10v1, but hey, thats pretty typical.)
That's funny because I haven't observed anything like that. In fact tonight a gang from my corp consisting of two recons and inty and a CS engaged five battleships. Not what I'd call cowardice.
Quote:
If you assumed I was a Southerner then I guess you have this idea of some kind of redneck bigot. You don't know me either pal. (or anything about the South for that matter, or anything outside you're comfort zone.) You wouldn't know a redneck if he was standing directly in front of you. Rednecks know no region, and if one were standing directly in front of you, I bet you wouldn't say ****.
Looks like I hit home to generate this kind of response from you. Of course I don't know you, that doesn't prevent me from seeing your ****ty unprovoked attitude over a disagreement on balance in a video game, of all things. Anyway you keep making (wrong) assumptions. I've lived in the south and I know a redneck when I see one. Do I think you're a typical redneck? No. Do I think you're a douche? Yes.
Quote:
I'm not one of those that expects people to fight fair or anything, but I'm also not one of those that backs down from a fight, and I won't run with my tail between my legs when the opportunity for a 1v1 or a 1v2-3 comes along. I'll stand my ground and fight. It's not asking too much to expect the same from others. I might lose the engagement, but at least I didn't run and grab a 10 man gang.
Apart from the fact I think you're full of ****, why should they give you kills when they can gank you instead. And make you post about it as a cherry on top.
Quote: Anyway, back to the story (...)
No. Too late for that. We could've had an interesting debate instead you chose to go down the "insults in an attempt to give my arguments authority" route.
Although I will say that this:
Quote:
What I'm talking about is 1v1, which if we were trying to balance two ships, would be the testing grounds.
Is flawed. The vast majority of combat in eve isn't 1v1, hence balancing ships based on it is stupid. Otherwise Caldari would need an extreme boost, especially the recons.
Anyway I'm done here.
|
Azirapheal
Amarr The Bastards
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 07:14:00 -
[272]
Originally by: Katrina Coreli
Originally by: Zyssa
Gallente HAD the best Fleet Command (now its equal to other races)
I cant see how the Eos is inline with the other races cmd ships. Post nerf its going to be pretty unflyable. The Eos needed turret slots taken off to halt the uber damage but the reduction to med drones is far too far.
Unlike the myrmi the Eos has no drone damage bonus and if its turret slots were reduced it would be inline with other cmd ships, a solid tank and decent dps. However post nerf it is frankly a lousy ship. I wouldnt fly it over the Brutix
and thats the point, the eos isnt supposed to be an uber damage pwn ship, its a fleet command ship, for helping your friends with boosts.... not a solo pwn mobile.
you want to keep using heavy drones on ships that are cruiser/bc sized?
let my harbinger use a full rack of t2 tachs then.
|
Praxis1452
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 07:33:00 -
[273]
Originally by: Azirapheal
Originally by: Katrina Coreli
Originally by: Zyssa
Gallente HAD the best Fleet Command (now its equal to other races)
I cant see how the Eos is inline with the other races cmd ships. Post nerf its going to be pretty unflyable. The Eos needed turret slots taken off to halt the uber damage but the reduction to med drones is far too far.
Unlike the myrmi the Eos has no drone damage bonus and if its turret slots were reduced it would be inline with other cmd ships, a solid tank and decent dps. However post nerf it is frankly a lousy ship. I wouldnt fly it over the Brutix
and thats the point, the eos isnt supposed to be an uber damage pwn ship, its a fleet command ship, for helping your friends with boosts.... not a solo pwn mobile.
you want to keep using heavy drones on ships that are cruiser/bc sized?
let my harbinger use a full rack of t2 tachs then.
The Eos can use mediums. The isthar can use heavies. Both are creodron manufactured. Yea the EOS should be able to use heavies. Why not complain about the ishtar then? I don't see nerfs about that every day. In fact the ishtar has been left alone.
|
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr Uninvited Guests
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 09:43:00 -
[274]
Originally by: Praxis1452
Originally by: Azirapheal
Originally by: Katrina Coreli
Originally by: Zyssa
Gallente HAD the best Fleet Command (now its equal to other races)
I cant see how the Eos is inline with the other races cmd ships. Post nerf its going to be pretty unflyable. The Eos needed turret slots taken off to halt the uber damage but the reduction to med drones is far too far.
Unlike the myrmi the Eos has no drone damage bonus and if its turret slots were reduced it would be inline with other cmd ships, a solid tank and decent dps. However post nerf it is frankly a lousy ship. I wouldnt fly it over the Brutix
and thats the point, the eos isnt supposed to be an uber damage pwn ship, its a fleet command ship, for helping your friends with boosts.... not a solo pwn mobile.
you want to keep using heavy drones on ships that are cruiser/bc sized?
let my harbinger use a full rack of t2 tachs then.
The Eos can use mediums. The isthar can use heavies. Both are creodron manufactured. Yea the EOS should be able to use heavies. Why not complain about the ishtar then? I don't see nerfs about that every day. In fact the ishtar has been left alone.
Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
|
Dzajic
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 12:43:00 -
[275]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
Yes, please CCP nerf Ishtar. Its ridiculous that a HAC has a DPS and tank of a BS. Its way out of line. And Domi still has too much grid and CPU for a drone boat, it should be looked at. But anyway Ishtar must be nerfed!
|
Hastur DragonTooth
Amarr Call of Cthulhu
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 13:40:00 -
[276]
Edited by: Hastur DragonTooth on 28/10/2007 13:40:42
Originally by: Undeadenemy [Anyway, back to the story - Gallente don't need nerfing, most of the ships are fine and balanced the way they are, maybe something could use a slight buff here or there, but theres nothing too badly overpowered that I can think of.
I disagree. The gallente need to be improved so that they end up with only 3 ships out of the entire fleet worth flying. As well, make those have impossible fitting issues. At that point we can consider the race to be "in balance."
So keep up the hard work, CCP. Improve the frenchies in the same way you keep giving "oomph" to the Amarr. We're counting on you to help them out.
Scientific test CCP ran to prove that EVE is heavily weighted in favor of Amarr, thus needing another nerf... |
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr Uninvited Guests
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 13:59:00 -
[277]
Originally by: Hastur DragonTooth Edited by: Hastur DragonTooth on 28/10/2007 13:40:42
Originally by: Undeadenemy [Anyway, back to the story - Gallente don't need nerfing, most of the ships are fine and balanced the way they are, maybe something could use a slight buff here or there, but theres nothing too badly overpowered that I can think of.
I disagree. The gallente need to be improved so that they end up with only 3 ships out of the entire fleet worth flying. As well, make those have impossible fitting issues. At that point we can consider the race to be "in balance."
So keep up the hard work, CCP. Improve the frenchies in the same way you keep giving "oomph" to the Amarr. We're counting on you to help them out.
QFT lol
|
Neena Valdi
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 14:04:00 -
[278]
Originally by: Dzajic
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
Yes, please CCP nerf Ishtar. Its ridiculous that a HAC has a DPS and tank of a BS. Its way out of line. And Domi still has too much grid and CPU for a drone boat, it should be looked at. But anyway Ishtar must be nerfed!
How about to get a clue?
Dps-wise: 1. Ogre II's do 470ish dps with all maxed skills, BUT Ogre 2's are extremely slow, so the vagabond in a gang WILL outdps Ishtar and more versatile as able to hit effectively both small, medium and large ships without much problems. Relaunching drones is rarely an option, as (as I already mentioned) it takes them time to travel. 2. Blaster dominix at same time do more dps AND easily outtanks Ishtar in most cases. Same for blastertron. Same for AC Maelstrom and Tempest. Same for Abaddon.
Tank-wise: Vagabond have by far more survivability unless you comparing it to nano-ishtar and even then nano-ishtar with same skills will not do more than 4km/s (unless you have billions of isk to spend em on snakes and faction mwd). Without implants and rigs will do only about 3.2km/s, with 2x polycarbons (+90mil in total ship price) it will do about 3.6-3.7km/s.
Nerfing Eos is another ridiculous idea. Because already: 1. Eos have worse tank than Nighthawk and Damnation. 2. Eos does less dps than Sleipnir (same reasons as above mentioned) and Absolution.
|
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr Uninvited Guests
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 14:11:00 -
[279]
Originally by: Neena Valdi
Originally by: Dzajic
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
Yes, please CCP nerf Ishtar. Its ridiculous that a HAC has a DPS and tank of a BS. Its way out of line. And Domi still has too much grid and CPU for a drone boat, it should be looked at. But anyway Ishtar must be nerfed!
How about to get a clue?
Dps-wise: 1. Ogre II's do 470ish dps with all maxed skills, BUT Ogre 2's are extremely slow, so the vagabond in a gang WILL outdps Ishtar and more versatile as able to hit effectively both small, medium and large ships without much problems. Relaunching drones is rarely an option, as (as I already mentioned) it takes them time to travel. 2. Blaster dominix at same time do more dps AND easily outtanks Ishtar in most cases. Same for blastertron. Same for AC Maelstrom and Tempest. Same for Abaddon.
Tank-wise: Vagabond have by far more survivability unless you comparing it to nano-ishtar and even then nano-ishtar with same skills will not do more than 4km/s (unless you have billions of isk to spend em on snakes and faction mwd). Without implants and rigs will do only about 3.2km/s, with 2x polycarbons (+90mil in total ship price) it will do about 3.6-3.7km/s.
Nerfing Eos is another ridiculous idea. Because already: 1. Eos have worse tank than Nighthawk and Damnation. 2. Eos does less dps than Sleipnir (same reasons as above mentioned) and Absolution.
So first youve proven how vastly overpowered a vagabond is. This is no news. We know that. Compare it to a zealot...
Then you complain about how eos doesnt have the best tank and/or best gank.
Welcome to the world of "I cant have all the good ships in all classes and the best damage type and the best ew racial and the best warfare link racial, so Im gonna whine" Welcome down to earth.
|
Susan Acid
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 14:57:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Dzajic
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
Yes, please CCP nerf Ishtar. Its ridiculous that a HAC has a DPS and tank of a BS. Its way out of line. And Domi still has too much grid and CPU for a drone boat, it should be looked at. But anyway Ishtar must be nerfed!
Don't feed the whiney Troll who wants to compare EVERY ship to Amarr.
|
|
Neena Valdi
Art of War Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 15:31:00 -
[281]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
So first youve proven how vastly overpowered a vagabond is. This is no news. We know that. Compare it to a zealot...
Then you complain about how eos doesnt have the best tank and/or best gank.
Welcome to the world of "I cant have all the good ships in all classes and the best damage type and the best ew racial and the best warfare link racial, so Im gonna whine" Welcome down to earth.
It's exactly my point. Didn't you get it? Ishtar and Eos are absolutely fine as they are now. They are NOT the best HAC and CS and they never were.
|
TOPSTER
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 16:33:00 -
[282]
Post by the OP has to be the biggest whine thread ever. I fly every single race, and can definitely say that even with the torp changes, my blasterthron char will still pwn the crap out of my raven char with the exact equal skills in spaceship command tanking etc. nerfing gallente... what are you smoking?
_______________ MK2 |
Dzajic
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 16:57:00 -
[283]
WTS Irony Detector II, Dread Guristas Sarcasm Sensor Array.
Like, is it that difficult to see that if anything happened to Ishtar or Domi drones as a primary weapon choice would be dead. As in dead, staked trough the heart and buried in a sealed metal casket?
Cut Mirms turret number, or grid and cpu. If this has to go trough ad high slot modules and rigs to increase bandwidth. Rework Eos all together. And rework and buff all assault frigs.
Heck, all needed to balance Myrm a bit would be to change the bonus to be only for light and medium drones.
|
Scaramunga Scaramai
Amarr Filthy Scum
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 17:18:00 -
[284]
This thread fails in every way.
I read somewhere in this thread that someone was comparing the Eos to the Absolution o_O. Amazingly they are two different classes of ship. It sucks having to acctually CHOOSE what ships to fly and how to fit them to get the most out of them. The Eos should never have been released with the slot layout / drone capacity that it had. This rebalancing is long overdue.
Welcome to the same decisions as the rest of Eve.
|
Mirinna
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 17:52:00 -
[285]
If CCP feels that the Eos is far to good DPS-wise for a fleet ship, adjustments could be made to make it usable as a fleet ship. As mentioned less guns and perhaps somewhat weaker drones. BUT instead of leaving it far to useless, why not boost the command modules bonuses? The information warfare bonus it gives at present is far too weak. Nerf DPS but then at least boost command modules making it a weak field ship but a good fleet ship. |
Melor Rend
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 21:22:00 -
[286]
Originally by: Stefan F For the raven being better then the mega: Fit 6x siege launcher Fit Web, Scram, MWD, injector, 2x painter. Fit 1/2 pg rigs to make it fit.
Now you have about the same dps (mega still wins, due to its 7th turret hardpoint and bigger dronebay) so lets see what the differences are now: - Raven is still sluggish and slow, Mega is much more agile - Raven has 5 low slots for some kind of armor tank and dps mods, thats 7 for mega
Rubish. Me and a mate just tested it on sisi. Both of us fit a gank setup my mega with plates and his raven also with a buffer tank. I used to be able to kill him with 80% armor and now he kills me with 40% armor.
So CCP has totally overboosted caldari and now my mega is pretty useless compared to a raven since the raven can hit from 30km and has a better tank as long as the raven has a tackler (which he usually will have when in gang).
So caldari buff was way to extreme. It used to be unbalanced in favor of gallente and now it's unbalanced in favor of caldari.
great job... |
Tar Manis
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 21:42:00 -
[287]
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
Originally by: Praxis1452
Originally by: Azirapheal
Originally by: Katrina Coreli
Originally by: Zyssa
Gallente HAD the best Fleet Command (now its equal to other races)
I cant see how the Eos is inline with the other races cmd ships. Post nerf its going to be pretty unflyable. The Eos needed turret slots taken off to halt the uber damage but the reduction to med drones is far too far.
Unlike the myrmi the Eos has no drone damage bonus and if its turret slots were reduced it would be inline with other cmd ships, a solid tank and decent dps. However post nerf it is frankly a lousy ship. I wouldnt fly it over the Brutix
and thats the point, the eos isnt supposed to be an uber damage pwn ship, its a fleet command ship, for helping your friends with boosts.... not a solo pwn mobile.
you want to keep using heavy drones on ships that are cruiser/bc sized?
let my harbinger use a full rack of t2 tachs then.
The Eos can use mediums. The isthar can use heavies. Both are creodron manufactured. Yea the EOS should be able to use heavies. Why not complain about the ishtar then? I don't see nerfs about that every day. In fact the ishtar has been left alone.
Lets keep our fingers crossed for nerfed ishtar too then.
well you'll have to wait longer because CCP disagrees with you. Ishtar will always have heavies and drone bonus. oh well... you lose.
|
DannyMoe
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 22:36:00 -
[288]
so the new torps will be a little like blasters? short range but faster rof?
so maybe you will need an ab/mwd on your raven for this setup?
getting 6 t2 torp launchers an ab/mwd and a good tank on a raven will be a very hard (maybe impossible) fit
the raven will do lots of dmg but have a very poor tank
i may be wrong guess ppl will have to test it
|
Tanox
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:19:00 -
[289]
Originally by: DannyMoe so the new torps will be a little like blasters? short range but faster rof?
so maybe you will need an ab/mwd on your raven for this setup?
getting 6 t2 torp launchers an ab/mwd and a good tank on a raven will be a very hard (maybe impossible) fit
the raven will do lots of dmg but have a very poor tank
i may be wrong guess ppl will have to test it
Yes, torpedoes are going to be the new 30k range, 1300 DPS, no-cap weapon system. Don't you just love it, when changes make sense.
|
Transcendant One
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:22:00 -
[290]
Originally by: Tanox
Yes, torpedoes are going to be the new 30k range, 1300 DPS, no-cap weapon system. Don't you just love it, when changes make sense.
There's this thing called signature radius. For the new torps it's at 450. A mega has 400. A typhoon 320.
|
|
Tanox
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:24:00 -
[291]
Originally by: Transcendant One
Originally by: Tanox
Yes, torpedoes are going to be the new 30k range, 1300 DPS, no-cap weapon system. Don't you just love it, when changes make sense.
There's this thing called signature radius. For the new torps it's at 450. A mega has 400. A typhoon 320.
It's called a target painter, there even so many of them in the game that they are sold on the market!
|
Transcendant One
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:28:00 -
[292]
And the target painter fits where? Dun dun dun. The Raven's primary tanking slots. To reach that gank at that range the raven must sacrifice tank for the painter or have a mate do it. Balanced.
|
Tanox
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:33:00 -
[293]
Originally by: Transcendant One And the target painter fits where? Dun dun dun. The Raven's primary tanking slots. To reach that gank at that range the raven must sacrifice tank for the painter or have a mate do it. Balanced.
And blaster ships don't need a web and a microwarp drive to work? If you can't fit a single target painter and still tank. WOW is that way --->
|
Transcendant One
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:35:00 -
[294]
Edited by: Transcendant One on 28/10/2007 23:35:32 And the Raven won't need a mwd to get in range and a web?
Take your own advice, go back to WoW instead of crying over an imbalance that doesn't exist.
|
Tanox
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:40:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Transcendant One Edited by: Transcendant One on 28/10/2007 23:35:32 And the Raven won't need a mwd to get in range and a web?
Take your own advice, go back to WoW instead of crying over an imbalance that doesn't exist.
How close due you need to get when you have a 30k range? Blaster boats need to get within about 5k, but wait that's ok, because they do most damage, right....hey!!!. Why do torpedoes now do at least as much damage with 6 times the range and don't need any cap to fire?
|
Tanox
|
Posted - 2007.10.28 23:53:00 -
[296]
Originally by: Transcendant One Edited by: Transcendant One on 28/10/2007 23:50:13
Originally by: Tanox
How close due you need to get when you have a 30k range? Blaster boats need to get within about 5k, but wait that's ok, because they do most damage, right....hey!!!. Why do torpedoes now do at least as much damage with 6 times the range and don't need any cap to fire?
Because you can automagically ensure you'll always be in range of your targets after warping in with your amazing 100 something m/s speed. There's no maneuvering going on in battle and targets don't change. Oh wait.
Plus an mwd is essential in 0.0.
And I just told you why their damage is justified, they need painters (and a web) to achieve it. What that means is that realistically the Raven with the new torps will be a better gang boat, and still worse solo (less tank). OMFG the Mega won't pwn the Raven at everything, run for the hills!!!
Who said that it should, but a cap passive weapon system that can do 1300 DPS up to 30k is plain moronic!
|
Transcendant One
|
Posted - 2007.10.29 00:00:00 -
[297]
I feel like we're going in circles... to do that it requires one or several painters depending on the target, plus having the target tackled (as does the mega, of course).
Those mid slots for painters could've been used for tank (Raven) or tds/damps (Raven and gangmates) so there is a sacrifice either way.
|
Rhamnousia
Caldari Pelennor Swarm R i s e
|
Posted - 2007.10.29 00:40:00 -
[298]
Amarr constantly cry about they stuck with the dmg type that suck vs. armor tanker. new flash: check what dmg type hybrid does. and check the resist of every t2 ships in existence in the game as of this moment. with the exception of minmatar having a kinetic hole, and guess what, no gallente ships can catch up to a minmatar ship. period.
deimos get 1500m/s after the mass reduction and speed buff. vagabond get more than that with an afterburner.
ishtar cant fit anything else BUT 5 heavies as weaponry system. they can be killed. unlike any other weaponry system that cant be permanent disable. TD on gun boats, sure, there's a counter for that. ECM on non-gunboat, sure. there's also a counter for that. Nano ishtar cant rescoop/relaunch drones, that's like flying a vagabond to 500m of the target --> nobody does it. coz it's moronic.
instead of nerfing the ever-loving crap outta the Eos, why not buff the other fleet command ship to be more inline with the existing wtfsolopwnmobile Eos? that make more sense than taking the one good thing of gallente away from us.
dominix is not the 2nd best dps BS out there, a raven (pre torp boost) would do more dmg than domi with 5 heavy drones.
comparing and trying to make gallente as broken as amarr is moronic. instead take a look and think. us gallente have it as bad as amarr. MWD, dual LAR on almost ANY ships, with the exception of a few, taranis, enyo, deimos, isthar, ishkur, arazu, lachesis.
amarr thinks they have cap problem. gallente does too. a neut would do the same dmg to any gallente ship as it does to an amarr ship.
myrm with 5 heavy drones t2 and 6 ion blaster IIs do at most 550dps. harb can touch 900dps. if both buffer tank, harb would come out on top coz of having more resist.
amarr says they're in more of a do-or-die situation than gallente, well, new flash, for gallente it's more like die-trying.
To Devs: play EVE, hire FOUR different ppl and give them unlimited SP to four of the races. and they will tell you exactly what is wrong with each. listen to the whine and whine and whine and whine and whine and whine and whine and whine and, well, you get the point, wont do the game OR you any good.
EVE is on the high way to hell and we're speeding. (tm) ---------------------- What happens in Pelennor stays in Pelennor.
Forever Pelennor |
Lyria Skydancer
Amarr Uninvited Guests
|
Posted - 2007.10.29 08:28:00 -
[299]
Originally by: Rhamnousia Biased crap
-You want deimos to be as fast as a vaga and still be able to do the damage it does? I think not.
-Complaining about Ishtar? LoL. Seriosly you shouldnt complain about it.
"comparing and trying to make gallente as broken as amarr is moronic. instead take a look and think. us gallente have it as bad as amarr. MWD, dual LAR on almost ANY ships, with the exception of a few, taranis, enyo, deimos, isthar, ishkur, arazu, lachesis."
-What are you saying? This sentence makes no sense
"amarr thinks they have cap problem. gallente does too. a neut would do the same dmg to any gallente ship as it does to an amarr ship."
-No gallente doesnt have a problem with cap compared to amarr. Gallente burns it cap slower then amarr and ontop of that they have more mids so fitting cap booster isnt a problem at all.
"myrm with 5 heavy drones t2 and 6 ion blaster IIs do at most 550dps. harb can touch 900dps. if both buffer tank, harb would come out on top coz of having more resist."
No the harbinger doesn get anywhere near 900dps. Dont lie. And the harbinger tanks like a paper boat while the myrm can field a battleship+ tank. Get a clue please.
|
Alex Harumichi
Gallente Gradient Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2007.10.29 08:38:00 -
[300]
Edited by: Alex Harumichi on 29/10/2007 08:40:07
Originally by: Lyria Skydancer
-No gallente doesnt have a problem with cap compared to amarr. Gallente burns it cap slower then amarr
That one almost had be splurting coffee all over the screen.
Thank god for clueless forum trolls, they do brighten up that Monday morning...
If this idiot actually flew Gallente, she'd maybe sound less like a raving loon. I guess that's too much to ask, though. Whining without information is so much more fun.
(and yes, I fly both, thanks for asking)
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |