| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

BLACK D0G
Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 02:16:00 -
[241]
id like to be amongst the first to say
hahahahahahaahahahahaahahahahaha
and also
pwned
|

Empyre
Domestic Reform
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 03:24:00 -
[242]
so is it still legal to join iMune in this manner if your corp stays to fight out its war?
I <3 empire.. usually. |

Kha0s
Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 03:24:00 -
[243]
Bah...someone beat me to it.
I guess I'll just have to repeat them in that case.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! OWNED!!!
  
|

Galsia Yovinda
Gallente Dec Me Please
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 03:27:00 -
[244]
Originally by: Empyre so is it still legal to join iMune in this manner if your corp stays to fight out its war?
They haven't said what the time you must stay is.
After all corporations do leave alliances during wars (usually the research corporations and such)
|

Ashley Sky
Mesopotamia iMune Empire
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 03:29:00 -
[245]
Edited by: Ashley Sky on 02/01/2008 03:31:50 After this was petitioned, it was apparently handed off to a bug hunter as a joke. Well apparently it's not such a little problem now is it? Please clarify Mr GM, or we will have no choice but to continue.
See my post on this thread for our official report.
We didn't break any rules. We simply did just as we were told.
|

Sofia Roseburn
Caldari Taurus Inc
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 03:31:00 -
[246]
Feel free to continue. It's an exploit now, and your accounts are potentially on the line for such actions.
Also, oh hi. -----
|

Ashley Sky
Mesopotamia iMune Empire
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 04:23:00 -
[247]
As of this time there is no official statement on precisely which of our methods is considered cheating or exploiting. I'd like better clarification so I know what to avoid. Until then I'll happily use any methods that are allowed by current game mechanics.
If you're a GM, please let us know. Thanks.
Originally by: Sofia Roseburn Feel free to continue. It's an exploit now, and your accounts are potentially on the line for such actions.
Also, oh hi.
|

Dianeces
Minmatar Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 04:26:00 -
[248]
Originally by: Sofia Roseburn Also, oh hi.
ohai Sofia o/
|

IMinYOURforums
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 04:46:00 -
[249]
Originally by: Ashley Sky As of this time there is no official statement on precisely which of our methods is considered cheating or exploiting. I'd like better clarification so I know what to avoid. Until then I'll happily use any methods that are allowed by current game mechanics.
If you're a GM, please let us know. Thanks.
If I were a GM you'd be banned already for saying you're going to contine, or for just being a douchebag.
|

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 05:36:00 -
[250]
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Empyre
Originally by: Ki An Wtf are you talking about? You didn't refute ANY of my points, and I am way older than 2 months and 17 days. If you can't even use the game interface to find out my character age, you shouldn't take part in a discussion about game mechanics.
my bad, 2 month and 18 days. hm, interesting.. tell us more..
You are really stupid, did you know that? Try checking my employment history, ya nub 
pwnd
/me rants about motherships
SKUNK
|

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 05:37:00 -
[251]
Originally by: Ashley Sky As of this time there is no official statement on precisely which of our methods is considered cheating or exploiting. I'd like better clarification so I know what to avoid. Until then I'll happily use any methods that are allowed by current game mechanics.
If you're a GM, please let us know. Thanks.
Originally by: Sofia Roseburn Feel free to continue. It's an exploit now, and your accounts are potentially on the line for such actions.
Also, oh hi.
They dont let you know, you get a hastily thought up two line "roleplay stlye" wittering about concord in the patch notes, then youve had it
SKUNK
|

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 05:44:00 -
[252]
Originally by: Empyre
Originally by: Speed Addict and privateers was not an exploit, they just had alot of wars going on
that's not the aspect that was an exploit. the part where they had corps coming and going in the alliance at their leisure when they wanted to fight and when they did not want to. that part i considered the exploit.
if you are in an alliance and they declare war then i think you should not be able to leave the alliance until at least certain conditions are met. they were trapping much more inferior victims sometimes in wars and then coming and going as they pleased.
just my 2 isk.
we were happy to accept locking of corps into the alliance as part of an intellignet review of the war dec system by ccp. The lack of intelligent review leads them to more problems now, and more of their paying customers ****ed off.
SKUNK
|

Jimer Lins
Gallente Pod Six Research
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 05:50:00 -
[253]
Originally by: IMinYOURforums
Originally by: Ashley Sky As of this time there is no official statement on precisely which of our methods is considered cheating or exploiting. I'd like better clarification so I know what to avoid. Until then I'll happily use any methods that are allowed by current game mechanics.
If you're a GM, please let us know. Thanks.
If I were a GM you'd be banned already for saying you're going to contine, or for just being a douchebag.
And that's why you're not a GM.
Need a covops or scout? Recruit me! |

David Khan
War Crimes
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:32:00 -
[254]
ITC: Carebears whine that they can't avoid PvP 100% of the time in eve, amirite?
|

Dianeces
Minmatar Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:40:00 -
[255]
Originally by: David Khan ITT: Carebears whine that they can't avoid PvP 100% of the time in eve, amirite?
FYP
|

Derek69
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:44:00 -
[256]
Edited by: Derek69 on 02/01/2008 07:44:04
Wtf Dianeces
|

Dianeces
Minmatar Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:45:00 -
[257]
Originally by: Derek69 Edited by: Derek69 on 02/01/2008 07:44:04
Wtf Dianeces
wut?
|

Derek69
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:46:00 -
[258]
Check it out, we're like... Brothers from another mother.
|

Dianeces
Minmatar Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:47:00 -
[259]
Originally by: Derek69 Check it out, we're like... Brothers from another mother.
Representin' ITT
|

Keyano
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:57:00 -
[260]
Edited by: Keyano on 02/01/2008 07:57:19
This entire thread and alliance is a joke.
|

Mitchman
Omniscient Order
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 07:58:00 -
[261]
I heard CCP has made this an exploit now. Good.
New video: Pride, Honor & Retribution
|

Jimer Lins
Gallente Pod Six Research
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 08:12:00 -
[262]
Originally by: David Khan ITC: Carebears whine that they can't avoid PvP 100% of the time in eve, amirite?
ITT: Griefers whine that they can't gank defenseless carebears 100% of the time in eev, amirite?
(see, trolling is both fun and easy!)
Now stop generalizing. There's been valid points made on both sides of the issue.
Need a covops or scout? Recruit me! |

David Khan
War Crimes
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 08:43:00 -
[263]
Originally by: Jimer Lins
Originally by: David Khan ITC: Carebears whine that they can't avoid PvP 100% of the time in eve, amirite?
ITT: Griefers whine that they can't gank defenseless carebears 100% of the time in eev, amirite?
They can't. Also, if you're so ignorant to think that the only empire wardecs are those "griefer" corps looking to "gank defenseless carebears" then please cancel your subscription and uninstall the game. Using this exploit gives any corporation, pvp inclined or not, easy access to removing any form of PvP from the PvP game they subscribe to, should they wish to.
|

Mirasta
Taurus Inc
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 08:47:00 -
[264]
Originally by: Ashley Sky Edited by: Ashley Sky on 02/01/2008 03:31:50 After this was petitioned, it was apparently handed off to a bug hunter as a joke. Well apparently it's not such a little problem now is it? Please clarify Mr GM, or we will have no choice but to continue.
See my post on this thread for our official report.
We didn't break any rules. We simply did just as we were told.
Fortunatly it seems the GMs like to take the comon sense route with issuse like this. I'm sure you will contine to use this exploit As its not you guys that will get the warning, It's the CEOs of the corparations avoiding wars.
It's Probbaly the niceist thing you can to to remind the people that your war deccing that they could loose there accounts over this exploit just incase they're tempted to use it... ya know?
To me It's pretty obvious that Avoiding the wars is an exploit Hopefully this is what GM Nova was refering to, I hope. I suppose if you want to test that out its upto you.
|

Dianeces
Minmatar Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 08:48:00 -
[265]
Originally by: Jimer Lins
Originally by: David Khan ITC: Carebears whine that they can't avoid PvP 100% of the time in eve, amirite?
ITT: Griefers whine that they can't gank defenseless carebears 100% of the time in eev, amirite?
(see, trolling is both fun and easy!)
Now stop generalizing. There's been valid points made on both sides of the issue.
ITT: Trolling
|

Byggare B0b
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 09:00:00 -
[266]
Quote: As I said before...its a clever idea, but not exactly in the spirit of the game
Noone in the community cares for what is in the spirit of the game any longer. They just wannabe the cool kid on the block. What ccp wants now adays is impossible to know, seeing all the changes and plans. Maybe we arent supposed to kill eachother without a pvp flag in the end after all, and by then we all be sitting in something bigger and slower than a planet. 
|

Snot U
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 11:32:00 -
[267]
as a mission running carebear for a year who has just joined an alliance thats been wardecced (b4 i joined i might add), i read this thread with interest.... it seems to me that the majority of whining posts have come from pathetic griefers who like to target noobs/unprotected haulers , not take up the challenge of fighting someone at their own skill lvl /age .. i accept that the world of EVE can NEVER be 100% safe but to wardec a bunch of harmless, defensless miners is pretty weak , so Imune serves a needed purpose imho.. i have lost a cpl of ships to the war as well as few to pilot error during missions and im not *****ing about that .... just at the gutless thugs that think its cool to wipe out innocents just for fun ... the same type who think their tough in RL cos they and ten of their mates can hospitalise old ladies .... war is a part of EVE life , accept it or leave ... but come on greifers ... have some balls and tackle corps that will actualy give you a challenge
|

Snot U
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 11:34:00 -
[268]
and YES ... this IS my alt
|

Ki An
Gallente Filiolus Of Bellum
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 11:39:00 -
[269]
Originally by: Snot U as a mission running carebear for a year who has just joined an alliance thats been wardecced (b4 i joined i might add), i read this thread with interest.... it seems to me that the majority of whining posts have come from pathetic griefers who like to target noobs/unprotected haulers , not take up the challenge of fighting someone at their own skill lvl /age .. i accept that the world of EVE can NEVER be 100% safe but to wardec a bunch of harmless, defensless miners is pretty weak , so Imune serves a needed purpose imho.. i have lost a cpl of ships to the war as well as few to pilot error during missions and im not *****ing about that .... just at the gutless thugs that think its cool to wipe out innocents just for fun ... the same type who think their tough in RL cos they and ten of their mates can hospitalise old ladies .... war is a part of EVE life , accept it or leave ... but come on greifers ... have some balls and tackle corps that will actualy give you a challenge
You need to stop watching Opera.
|

Snot U
|
Posted - 2008.01.02 11:53:00 -
[270]
Opera ???? hahahaha ... opera doesnt have half the drama queens ya find in here .... roflmao
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |