Why does not CCP enforce the gamechanges as the occur?

When something is removed from the game or some criteria is changed for where items etc. are allowed, why is this not retroactive making the game-mech the same for everyone?

One example is carriers in high-sec which used to be allowed but now it ain't. Technicly it is extreemly simple for CCP to move these to an area which they in fact are allowed.


So CCP, mind explaining to me using very simple language (I'm a bit dense as you might have noticed) why you don't clean up your mess?

OCD much?

Remove all T2 BPO's now! No compensation. Remove all moon goo now. GIve everyone 100B.

/c

Why does not CCP enforce the gamechanges as the occur?

When something is removed from the game or some criteria is changed for where items etc. are allowed, why is this not retroactive making the game-mech the same for everyone?

One example is carriers in high-sec which used to be allowed but now it ain't. Technicly it is extreemly simple for CCP to move these to an area which they in fact are allowed.


So CCP, mind explaining to me using very simple language (I'm a bit dense as you might have noticed) why you don't clean up your mess?

Troll much?

Seems your Norsk Testosteron or whatever is doing serious stuff to your brains my friend, I'm not sure you're the only one understanding what you just stated there, but be it, I'll give my answer and doesn't matter if my opinion is different from what you expect.

You fail to understand how high sec is rather a high risk place already with sub cap ships for the regular player, the only ones for who high sec is really safe is for gankers scamers grieffers yellow self proclaimed "pirates" (read pussies) of all sort.

Now go ahead and give those pussies more tools to make high sec even worst. By the way CCP should change starting systems from high sec 1.0 to big alliances homelands in null and the tutorial agents give missions related to said alliance, those noobs would be a lot safer and have a better game start than in that crap that is "high sec".

You keep arguing a point you haven't made. Why is this a problem for you or anybody else, and why does it need to be fixed?

I mean other than tidying things up?

You keep arguing a point you haven't made. Why is this a problem for you or anybody else, and why does it need to be fixed?

I mean other than tidying things up?

there are thing in EVE that he will never have, no matter how hard he tries!!!!!


(sales of high-sec capitals are forbidden)

Why even care ?
What's your point ?
Where do you see a mess ?

There's no need to remove them. Carriers in highsec are bound to strict rules
and any violation of these rules will put them to lowsec.

There is no point in doing it. There is no need to
and they actually add bonus value to where they are.

Besides, no dev/gm would ever dare to take away Chribbas VeldNaught from Amarr on purpose.

CCP never added a rule that disallowed carriers in high sec. What they did was add these rules:

Carriers may not enter high sec after a specific date,
Carriers may not be built in high sec after a specific date.

But they never made a rule that prohibits them from being in high sec. As there is no rule that prohibits them from existing in high sec, there is no mess to clean up.

It's quite simple. You are not allowed to build carriers in hi-sec. You are not allowed to jump a carrier into hi-sec. Ergo, you are not allowed to have a carrier in hi-sec.

It's not about what's it to me and what's it to you or whatever. It's about CCP following their own god dam gameplay rules.

Move them to low-sec, they have no business in hi (not arguing but stating a point). What does that mean to you?

Remove all T2 BPO's now! No compensation. Remove all moon goo now. GIve everyone 100B.

/c

Yup, sounds just like a jealousy rage thread to me.

Learn the subtle but important difference between the phrases "not allowed" and "no longer allowed".

CCP rules state clearly that those caps are grandfathered in unless they misbehave, so they ARE following their own rules... you simply don't like those rules.

I like how quickly you get angry\offensive with people.

Firstly,
Your logic fails.
You're not allowed to build caps in high sec + you're not allowed to jump caps into high sec doesn't = you're not allowed caps in high sec.

Secondly,
They're not doing anything, you can't fit them for aggression and you can't sell them so they're effecively just a bragging right. So where's the hard.

Lets here your rational well constructed argument for wht T2 BPOs must be removed from the game.
Taking into account that they're not respionsible for there "being no profit in T2 invention" as things like Damage Control II's used to run around 20-30mil before invention and the low profit margins have been proven time and again to be a mix of inventards not working things out, the "I R MINE IT SO R IS FREE" crew and the "right click sell, whatever" brigade.

There is always a way for you to get this though, get the isk, buy the bpos, destroy them yourself.

TO MAKE MY SELF CLEAR: I do not want carriers in Hi. I want them moved and never to be let in again.

Why are you talking about T2 BPOs? This is off topic no?

I agree!

edit: minus the 100B

But why? They are not allowed to do anything other than fly around or mine really. If they break the rules, then they get banned for a few weeks and the capital is moved in to lowsec. Other than the fact that you can not have your own one in Hi-sec, why should a piece of EVE history be removed from the game?

And on the 'special rules for some', well, hi-sec has its own special rules that seperate it from null-sec. Should we blend the two together, either making the entire game Hi-sec or the entire game null-sec, just because players in each may not like the way things work in the other?