I don''t like you either, you best watch yourself

Or, what, you'll get him removed like you're failing to do with Empire capitals?

Still asking you to show me where it says as you say.

Hi Murrfa. I hate to rain on your parade. Sadly we will have to move this ship to a low sec. system. What has been said previously is correct, players have never been been able to build Rorquals in high sec systems. How the ship ended up there remains to be determined, but it will have to be moved.

I am getting scared.

Then the question I ask is this: Why are there any carriesr in Hi-Sec at all? WHY? History?? Tourism???

No it's because CCP "forgot" to move the existing fleet out (usual mockup).

The rest of you can showel it. You are only protecting your interests because you are afraid what will come next.

The rest of you can showel it. You are only protecting your interests because you are afraid what will come next.

CCP doesn't allow any carrier in hisec except for the ones who where there before the new 0.7 rules happened. This is a fact and I am sure a GM could support this (But I guess they won't since this is a ticking bomb). If you don't believe me, check the linky in the "jita carrier" thread.


Then the question I ask is this: Why are there any carriesr in Hi-Sec at all? WHY? History?? Tourism???


No it's because CCP "forgot" to move the existing fleet out (usual mockup). But clearly they don't want them there that stating anything else would be just plain stupid.

Now they lach the ability/will to deal with it so they do DC (as usual) and hope noone sais anything about it.

Well I say somthing about it and I demand to know why CCP allows this trovesty to continue.



The share interest and slaughter by concerned people of this thread should tell you something CCP so how about a statement???

Aleast tell me I'm wrong....



The rest of you can showel it. You are only protecting your interests because you are afraid what will come next.

CCP doesn't allow any carrier in hisec except for the ones who where there before the new 0.7 rules happened. This is a fact and I am sure a GM could support this (But I guess they won't since this is a ticking bomb). If you don't believe me, check the linky in the "jita carrier" thread.


Then the question I ask is this: Why are there any carriesr in Hi-Sec at all? WHY? History?? Tourism???


No it's because CCP "forgot" to move the existing fleet out (usual mockup). But clearly they don't want them there that stating anything else would be just plain stupid.

Now they lach the ability/will to deal with it so they do DC (as usual) and hope noone sais anything about it.

Well I say somthing about it and I demand to know why CCP allows this trovesty to continue.



The share interest and slaughter by concerned people of this thread should tell you something CCP so how about a statement???

Aleast tell me I'm wrong....



The rest of you can showel it. You are only protecting your interests because you are afraid what will come next.

What interests would those be exactly?

Let's deal with one thing at a time shall we. But Chribba was touching some of it.

If by "ticking bomb" you actually mean "nobody cares, as is CLEARLY evidenced by this thread".

So far you've been made a laughing stock in every thread you have had a major appearance in... and been proven wrong in every assertion you have made.

No no if it makes up a part of your argument then you are going to have to back it up.

Having just read the OP's drivel on hisec caps, I have a question for the OP, why is it so so hard for you to understand that hisec caps have no valid purpose and are therefore no threat to anybody?

They are a relic of bygone days when cap production was possible in hisec, as such they have "grandfather" rights as long as the owners do not break the rules as set down by CCP.

Real world example of grandfather rights coming up btw.

In the UK our driving licence rules have changed somewhat since I passed my driving test, under current legislation to tow a trailer/caravan, ride a moped, drive a commercial vehicle all require separate driving tests for separate licence categories. All drivers who have passed their driving test after an arbitrary date have to abide by this legislation in order to be legally able to drive vehicles covered by this.

I however passed my driving test way before this legislation was brought in, I do not need to take these separate tests because at the time I passed my test a full driving licence covered all of these catergories, this is called grandfather rights, it is a relic of bygone days when legislation was different.

It is no different in game, the caps were produced in hisec according to the rules at the the time of construction, they are severely restricted in use by the current rules, stop your bleating and HTFU as you so eloquently titled the thread.

Well it certainly stirred up an interest.

And we'll see who's laughing in the end.

I can't believe this topic has reached 10 pages. Are people extraordinarily bored today?

I can't believe this topic has reached 10 pages. Are people extraordinarily bored today?

Interest and support are two different things.

If you look closely, you'll find nobody is agreeing with you.

Which pretty clearly indicates that you are primarily motivated by a need for attention, since it is apparent you are accomplishing nothing but make yourself look foolish... and are hurting your "point" rather than making it.

Which makes you a typical, pathetic forum troll... and ultimately insignificant and unworthy of attention.

Things tend to backfire, don't they....

yes, this is certainly a very pressing matter that warrants 10 pages of discussion.



wtf

Listen. I have already concluded with the fact that I am the only one speaking for this change. I actually made that statement several pages ago.

Do I care? No.

You however are trying very hard to discredit me by attacking everything on a broad front without actually having made one single good point in this discussion. Very few have. You think because you lean on nostalgia and history that this are valid points. Too you maybee (however i suspect underlying causes) but to me they are dribbel.

And often I find when unpopular topics are being discussed, people tend to be quiet, afraid of popular beliefs and the people behind them.

But in the end, Opinion is Opinion.

yes, this is certainly a very pressing matter that warrants 10 pages of discussion.



wtf

Yep.

But in the end, Opinion is Opinion.

Fixed that for you, champ.

I am getting scared.

It shows that people get's excited when their STUFF is in jeapordy.


Some people can't handle something taken away from them but by gods if it is the last thing I do it will be this!

You think because you lean on nostalgia and history that this are valid points. Too you maybee (however i suspect underlying causes) but to me they are dribbel.