Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
1030
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:15:00 -
[211] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:If by "ticking bomb" you actually mean "nobody cares, as is CLEARLY evidenced by this thread".
So far you've been made a laughing stock in every thread you have had a major appearance in... and been proven wrong in every assertion you have made.
Well it certainly stirred up an interest. And we'll see who's laughing in the end. Interest and support are two different things. If you look closely, you'll find nobody is agreeing with you. Which pretty clearly indicates that you are primarily motivated by a need for attention, since it is apparent you are accomplishing nothing but make yourself look foolish... and are hurting your "point" rather than making it. Which makes you a typical, pathetic forum troll... and ultimately insignificant and unworthy of attention. Things tend to backfire, don't they.... Listen. I have already concluded with the fact that I am the only one speaking for this change. I actually made that statement several pages ago. Do I care? No. You however are trying very hard to discredit me by attacking everything on a broad front without actually having made one single good point in this discussion. Very few have. You think because you lean on nostalgia and history that this are valid points. Too you maybee (however i suspect underlying causes) but to me they are dribbel. And often I find when unpopular topics are being discussed, people tend to be quiet, afraid of popular beliefs and the people behind them. But in the end, Right is right.
Quite correct, although that fact has nothing to do with this thread... or you. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |
Jonah Gravenstein
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:17:00 -
[212] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:
So if a nerf comes along or game-rule change all existing ships should be unaffected?
You drive a MC without a helmet?
BA is king (sign.)
Nerfs are generally a matter of game balance, they are for CCP to decide, if you really really feel that there is a good reason to kick out the hisec caps owned by the likes of Chribba then feel free to petition CCP directly, don't be surprised when they just laugh in your face and tell you to foxtrot oscar.
as for driving a motorcycle without a helmet, A: you don't drive a motorcycle you ride it, same as a bicycle and B: if you want to ride a motorcycle without a helmet be my guest, I have a Darwin award waiting for when you remove yourself from the genepool by way of the contents of your skull becoming a bonnet (hood for the Americans) ornament. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
734
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:17:00 -
[213] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:Why does not CCP enforce the gamechanges as the occur?
I'll tell you why.
It's their game and they can do what they want with it.
If you find that unacceptable, find another game to play.
Mr Epeen
Me too!-á I ate one sour, too! |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:21:00 -
[214] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:
So if a nerf comes along or game-rule change all existing ships should be unaffected?
You drive a MC without a helmet?
BA is king (sign.)
Nerfs are generally a matter of game balance, they are for CCP to decide, if you really really feel that there is a good reason to kick out the hisec caps owned by the likes of Chribba then feel free to petition CCP directly, don't be surprised when they just laugh in your face and tell you to foxtrot oscar. as for driving a motorcycle without a helmet, A: you don't drive a motorcycle you ride it, same as a bicycle and B: if you want to ride a motorcycle without a helmet be my guest, I have a Darwin award waiting for when you remove yourself from the genepool by way of the contents of your skull becoming a bonnet (hood for the Americans) ornament.
So you agree then, changes should be retroactive to affect all existing items, ships and players.
CCP is spineless because of icons as you mention and this change will never happen as things are today, I want to plant a seed though.
As for your witty remarks trying to circumvein the obvious flaws in your previous post, I am not an american and english is not my native language.
and to be bloddy honnest, I really don't give a rats arse what you think about my grammar, punctuation or spelling.
And YOU still don't ride a MC without a helmet even if it was allowed back in 1906 when you where a kid. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:23:00 -
[215] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:Why does not CCP enforce the gamechanges as the occur?
I'll tell you why. It's their game and they can do what they want with it. If you find that unacceptable, find another game to play. Mr Epeen
Anyone telling someone to play something else is an idiot. so (drumwhirl): You sir are an idiot. |
Jonah Gravenstein
46
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:29:00 -
[216] - Quote
I underlined and bolded the important part, hisec caps do not affect game balance, they cannot be used in combat, ergo they are useless relics of the past
And for your information I do ride a motorcycle complete with a helmet as required by the current law, which is there to stop the contents of my skull being painted all over the front end of a car, which is something I would very much like to avoid tyvm. War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1378
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:30:00 -
[217] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:So if a nerf comes along or game-rule change all existing ships should be unaffected?
Interesting.
That's actually something different.
Take a Drake-Nerf, as example.
If all the Drakes that got built already wouldn't be affected by that nerf, it means that these drakes would actually be worth more than newer ones.
People nowadays would probably pay tens (!) of billions for a nano-b/s pre speednerf, for example.
Now besides the problems that would arise out of this ...
These Drakes still have to be able to interact with the "newer" Drakes, else you'd lose point ... and there's a difference, because highsec capitals can't interact with anything or anybody legally, except asteroids.
Breaking the rules means BAN! and a free shipment to lowsec.
There are no rules to break for prenerf-Drakes. They are free to interact with anybody, else they'd make no sense except "show off" or "mining", and your argument has no ground as long as it's just about these two things. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5028
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 21:51:00 -
[218] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:You however are trying very hard to discredit me by attacking everything on a broad front without actually having made one single good point in this discussion. Very few have. GǪleast of all you, since you can't even explain what the actual problem is.
Quote:But in the end, Right is right. So what's GÇ£rightGÇ¥?
Quote:So you agree then, changes should be retroactive to affect all existing items, ships and players. Fun fact: they do. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
41
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 22:39:00 -
[219] - Quote
OP is full of it, OP HTFU !
leave the relic caps in high sec, it doesn't effect you, find a new orange box to stand on. |
Pyx Jasta
104th Ranger Mobile Combat Regiment Insane Asylum
39
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:01:00 -
[220] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:[
It shows that people get's excited when their STUFF is in jeapordy.
Some people can't handle something taken away from them but by gods if it is the last thing I do it will be this!
No it shows that the eve forums really really like train wrecks.
|
|
Ai Shun
302
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:58:00 -
[221] - Quote
FeralShadow wrote:I can't believe this topic has reached 10 pages. Are people extraordinarily bored today?
Probably. There is also a certain dislike of pathetic whining evident. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:43:00 -
[222] - Quote
This thread has been answered by a very narrow base of players.
This narrow base of players are the ones who gives a ****
It has gone from trolls, slightly interesting discussion, repetative dribel and finally roared out into personal attacks and WOW cards being thrown out.
To engage people this much shows that there is something really messed up here and I hope for the objective reader that this has become evident.
Is my logic flawless... Is my retorics perfect... no it isn't but I am definately not alone.
At any time CCP could have stepped in and said: "Only a slelected few are allowed to have caps in High. This is the rules, deal with it or foxtrot oscar". They didn't. They didn't say I was wrong, they didn't defend their standing flawed policies (because they know it is flawed). Hell they could even increase their immediate poularity by shutting an idiot such as me down. So why didn't they??? BECAUSE IT IS MESSED UP, that's why and because it would put CCP in a spot where they don't wish to be. So screw your history and screw your tourism. It's all a load of crap. Here is why:
Favourable groups and all that works fine in real life where certain groups needs protection and such. It has no place in a game what so ever and don't let the "why not" and "no you are wrong coz i gotz most likez" fool you.
In the end all people are working towards gaining advantages for themselves. Nothing wrong with that. It's just hillarious fun to watch how their fasade and houses build of card tumble away once someone breathes a breath of air in their direction.
I am done, CCP you may close the thread. |
Aldous Sancros
Carbon-16
3
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:47:00 -
[223] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:This thread has been answered by a very narrow base of players.
This narrow base of players are the ones who gives a ****
It has gone from trolls, slightly interesting discussion, repetative dribel and finally roared out into personal attacks and WOW cards being thrown out.
To engage people this much shows that there is something really messed up here and I hope for the objective reader that this has become evident.
Is my logic flawless... Is my retorics perfect... no it isn't but I am definately not alone.
At any time CCP could have stepped in and said: "Only a slelected few are allowed to have caps in High. This is the rules, deal with it or foxtrot oscar". They didn't. They didn't say I was wrong, they didn't defend their standing flawed policies (because they know it is flawed). Hell they could even increase their immediate poularity by shutting an idiot such as me down. So why didn't they??? BECAUSE IT IS MESSED UP, that's why and because it would put CCP in a spot where they don't wish to be. So screw your history and screw your tourism. It's all a load of crap. Here is why:
Favourable groups and all that works fine in real life where certain groups needs protection and such. It has no place in a game what so ever and don't let the "why not" and "no you are wrong coz i gotz most likez" fool you.
In the end all people are working towards gaining advantages for themselves. Nothing wrong with that. It's just hillarious fun to watch how their fasade and houses build of card tumble away once someone breathes a breath of air in their direction.
I am done, CCP you may close the thread.
There's just a cornucopia of fallacious reasoning in here. Where would you like me to start?
|
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
406
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 02:50:00 -
[224] - Quote
As if anyone from CCP bothered reading this thread beyond the first post.
Irrelevant thread is irrelevant. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
587
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 03:36:00 -
[225] - Quote
The part where you fail (the part I feel like bringing up) is that there is no preferential treatment. CCP is even letting those who use questionable methods to get their caps into HS keep them. So, you want a cap in HS, get it there. Then find out how useless it actually is.
Also I like the part where you expect CCP to have actually read the thread. We all know it takes a report for most threads to be noticed. |
Mallak Azaria
Dominus Nex Angelus
57
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 03:48:00 -
[226] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:CCP hasn't got the balls to make unpopular descicions and it's time somone puts this on the agenda.
As I recall, CCP did in fact have the balls to bring in the very unpopular NEX store.
Your argument is invalid.
|
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
420
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:03:00 -
[227] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:It has gone from trolls, slightly interesting discussion, repetative dribel and finally roared out into personal attacks and WOW cards being thrown out.
To engage people this much shows that there is something really messed up here and I hope for the objective reader that this has become evident.
Is my logic flawless... Is my retorics perfect... no it isn't but I am definately not alone. Hmmmmm...
*places tinfoil hat on the OP*
Ahhh... much better.
Schmacos tryne wrote:At any time CCP could have stepped in and said: "Only a slelected few are allowed to have caps in High. This is the rules, deal with it or foxtrot oscar". They didn't. They didn't say I was wrong, they didn't defend their standing flawed policies (because they know it is flawed). Hell they could even increase their immediate poularity by shutting an idiot such as me down. So why didn't they??? BECAUSE IT IS MESSED UP, that's why and because it would put CCP in a spot where they don't wish to be. So screw your history and screw your tourism. It's all a load of crap. Here is why: CCP rarely gets involved in threads like these. Probably because they are laughing so hard they are incapable of typing (or they are reading all this with their pants down and find it very difficult to type with one hand).
10/10 for originality, rage, and auto-destructing dogma. "Just because I seem like an idiot, doesn't mean I am one." ~Unknown |
Ai Shun
303
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 04:28:00 -
[228] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:At any time CCP could have stepped in and said: "Only a slelected few are allowed to have caps in High. This is the rules, deal with it or foxtrot oscar". They didn't. They didn't say I was wrong, they didn't defend their standing flawed policies (because they know it is flawed).
I will refer you to the EVElopedia article on high-sec capitals.
I'm guessing they were not in the mood to repeat themselves to you when the information is readily available.
You can see the GM rules linked to from that EVELopedia page as well.
Now ... Foxtrot Oscar. |
TheBlueMonkey
Natural Progression
66
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 09:46:00 -
[229] - Quote
Schmacos tryne wrote:TheBlueMonkey wrote:I give up and agree with your view point
I too hate history and think that everything in the past should be ignored and have current rules applied to it Your attempt on irony is lost. You're saying you paid 15% tax in 1986 so you will always pay 15% tax?
and you're saying I paid 15% tax in 1986 so should be able to redeem the difference in tax change today. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:54:00 -
[230] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:At any time CCP could have stepped in and said: "Only a slelected few are allowed to have caps in High. This is the rules, deal with it or foxtrot oscar". They didn't. They didn't say I was wrong, they didn't defend their standing flawed policies (because they know it is flawed). I will refer you to the EVElopedia article on high-sec capitals. I'm guessing they were not in the mood to repeat themselves to you when the information is readily available. You can see the GM rules linked to from that EVELopedia page as well. Now ... Foxtrot Oscar.
My post was for CCP to HTFU
GM Grimm said:
The general idea was that no capitals should be allowed in high sec and then we had some vague un-official guidelines on ships built before changes and whatnot. Those rules were never really actually set in stone and hence the situation we face now.
I think they should have told you all to GFYS. This is my opinion and there is nothing your pretentious cool-wannabie joke of a character can do to change that.
You are just a barbie pop queen who should be gathering likes in the "ooohhh look at my toon" thread which for some reason is found relevant to the game by CCP. You are a waste of space and a splatter on my windshield.
All I am is just a guy who want's CCP to HTFU and enforce their "INTENDED" rules better. |
|
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:56:00 -
[231] - Quote
TheBlueMonkey wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:TheBlueMonkey wrote:I give up and agree with your view point
I too hate history and think that everything in the past should be ignored and have current rules applied to it Your attempt on irony is lost. You're saying you paid 15% tax in 1986 so you will always pay 15% tax? and you're saying I paid 15% tax in 1986 so should be able to redeem the difference in tax change today.
I don't expect you ever paid tax, just having a big fat straw into the santaclaus bag so I coudn't say for sure.
Furthermore you pretend to not understand my metaphore. Or atleast I hope you pretend. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:57:00 -
[232] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:CCP hasn't got the balls to make unpopular descicions and it's time somone puts this on the agenda. As I recall, CCP did in fact have the balls to bring in the very unpopular NEX store. Your argument is invalid.
You are invalid. If CCP had balls they would sell SP in the nex store. This was what they intended. You got goggles instead due to again CCP being spineless. |
Zleon Leigh
89
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:57:00 -
[233] - Quote
OP has too much time on his hands..
But it does bring up a question that CCP could easily answer - how many caps, legally or otherwise, are in HiSec right now? Types? Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital.
CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 17:59:00 -
[234] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:The part where you fail (the part I feel like bringing up) is that there is no preferential treatment. CCP is even letting those who use questionable methods to get their caps into HS keep them. So, you want a cap in HS, get it there. Then find out how useless it actually is.
Also I like the part where you expect CCP to have actually read the thread. We all know it takes a report for most threads to be noticed.
GM Grimm said:
The general idea was that no capitals should be allowed in high sec and then we had some vague un-official guidelines on ships built before changes and whatnot. Those rules were never really actually set in stone and hence the situation we face now.
This is differential treatment allowing only a selecte few to keep their ships in HS.
I bet if I draw a ascii wiener CCP would react pretty fast..... |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:01:00 -
[235] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:As if anyone from CCP bothered reading this thread beyond the first post.
Irrelevant thread is irrelevant.
Only thing irrelevant here is you. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:02:00 -
[236] - Quote
Aldous Sancros wrote:There's just a cornucopia of fallacious reasoning in here. Where would you like me to start?
You can start by pulling your head out of your ass. |
Zag'mar Jurkar
QC Steel Industries
11
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:20:00 -
[237] - Quote
Why is this thread still alive ?! |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
418
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:20:00 -
[238] - Quote
I see the OP has finally been reduced to just anger and weaksauce personal attacks and has still failed to present to the community who exactly has been adversely affected by a few grandfathered high-sec caps that CCP has rendered impotent.
You should definitely file a petition and make CCP fully aware of your manufactured outrage since they aren't going to answer you here.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:30:00 -
[239] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:I see the OP has finally been reduced to just anger and weaksauce personal attacks and has still failed to present to the community who exactly has been adversely affected by a few grandfathered high-sec caps that CCP has rendered impotent.
You should definitely file a petition and make CCP fully aware of your manufactured outrage since they aren't going to answer you here.
You just don't get it do you.
CCP is unable to do things right and this is evidence for this. Read the title of the OP and try to get it into your head that I don't give a fokk about caps in hi. I give a fokk about how CCP handle (or don't handle) things.
The so called attacks you mention is just answer in kind. Don't worry your comprehension is not required. |
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 20:31:00 -
[240] - Quote
Zag'mar Jurkar wrote:Why is this thread still alive ?!
I could ask the same about you? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |