| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Pringlescan
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 02:27:00 -
[271]
Edited by: Pringlescan on 11/06/2008 02:27:45 This is a clear chance to prove that the majority of the playerbase that you are supposed to represent trust you via a vote of their elected representatives so you shouldn't be afraid of the vote as it will vindicate that you are the subject of a loud but very minor goon faction, unless of course you admit that the majority of the playerbase finds the way you have been acting harmful and detrimental to the health of this democracy experiment and would rather have a non-partisan chairman elected.
We don't need or want a goon as a chairman, we would be happy with whoever the council decides in an open vote with all members present.
|

SauI Tigh
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 02:30:00 -
[272]
Having an open vote for a new chairman would be the fastest, least deceive and most productive thing this council could do. You owe it to the playerbase to elect someone that a majority of the council can stand.
|

Gergragda
Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 02:49:00 -
[273]
Agree |

Theramin Dogon
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 02:53:00 -
[274]
Edited by: Theramin Dogon on 11/06/2008 02:56:11
Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto
Originally by: Theramin Dogon
Originally by: Jade Constantine Herschel Yamamoto on the other hand even though I disagree with him over the issue of muting inanna, I do care what he thinks because he's taken time to read and present issues here, take an interest in the CSM process and generally be a responsible respondent to issues threads.
You're hardly acting as if you care what anyone else thinks, as you've repeatedly said that you'll act the same way in the future.
I can't find the Jade bit you quoted. Where was that said?
Yeah, I'm having a hard time of finding it myself. It might have been in another thread or something, I'll look :\
EDIT: Found it. Thanks, eve-search! |

ceyriot
Induseng Enterprises R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 04:14:00 -
[275]
Originally by: Zeoliter Goons like to take the game seriously. C/D
quoting dis to give non-support |

The Speaker
The Clue Factory
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 04:14:00 -
[276]
It's nice to have one's suspicions confirmed. Yep, vote of no confidence in "Jade Constantine" since it's been very clear that he's not up to the task at hand. |

baalaagaa
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 05:49:00 -
[277]
All hail Fnhrer Constantine! |

Elecktra Blue
Battlestars GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 06:31:00 -
[278]
I support this issue.
|

Kwint Sommer
Lothian Quay Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 09:05:00 -
[279]
Originally by: hammyhamm Its a clause that should have been in the initial CSM document.
This isn't trying to be "Goons trying to take over CSM", it's making sure that if for some instance the councilmembers were to lose faith in the elected chairman, they could force a revote for a new one.
It's how commitees work.
It's also how committees don't work, they waste tons of time and effort bickering and voting over things that have nothing to do with why they were created in the first place.
|

lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 09:28:00 -
[280]
Originally by: Kwint Sommer
Originally by: hammyhamm Its a clause that should have been in the initial CSM document.
This isn't trying to be "Goons trying to take over CSM", it's making sure that if for some instance the councilmembers were to lose faith in the elected chairman, they could force a revote for a new one.
It's how commitees work.
It's also how committees don't work, they waste tons of time and effort bickering and voting over things that have nothing to do with why they were created in the first place.
Remember that all those who's guys did not get voted in now have a target for all that disappointment and bitterness and i defy you to claim that most eve players (especially those who want nerfs or changes to the game) are not that petty.
|

Narciss Sevar
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 09:52:00 -
[281]
This has my full support.
|

Endemoniado
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 09:54:00 -
[282]
Supported enthusiastically.
|

Sigmorhair
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 10:11:00 -
[283]
Jade is worthless - supporting this.
|

Sigmorhair
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 10:16:00 -
[284]
Originally by: lecrotta
Originally by: Kwint Sommer
Originally by: hammyhamm Its a clause that should have been in the initial CSM document.
This isn't trying to be "Goons trying to take over CSM", it's making sure that if for some instance the councilmembers were to lose faith in the elected chairman, they could force a revote for a new one.
It's how commitees work.
It's also how committees don't work, they waste tons of time and effort bickering and voting over things that have nothing to do with why they were created in the first place.
Remember that all those who's guys did not get voted in now have a target for all that disappointment and bitterness and i defy you to claim that most eve players (especially those who want nerfs or changes to the game) are not that petty.
Wow your corp has one member - thanks for letting us know how you really feel alt. |

Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 10:52:00 -
[285]
Every kind of council or government body (which we don't have here actually) needs a means to remove the head of that body to maintain functionality and to prevent grasps at autocratic powers.
The ability of the council to call for a vote of non-confidence against the chair is supported. |

Adam Schmidt
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:01:00 -
[286]
Supported. |

Teratoma Smith
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:05:00 -
[287]
This procedure is necessary. Supported. |

Gyro DuAquin1
Tri Optimum Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:12:00 -
[288]
Edited by: Gyro DuAquin1 on 11/06/2008 11:11:45 After ive seen the results and that Jade is becoming boss of the CSM i thought to myself "This will make a wonderul thread" and here we are.
I support this |

RiotGrrrl
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:21:00 -
[289]
Supported, as with the other thread.
The chairman needs to be a unilaterally chosen member by the delegates from the delegates. |

High Inquisitress
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:28:00 -
[290]
Originally by: RiotGrrrl Supported, as with the other thread.
The chairman needs to be a unilaterally chosen member by the delegates from the delegates.
You have to actually click the supported checkbox. Unless you voted earlier in the thread. |

Heng
Black Omega Security Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:30:00 -
[291]
I'm sort of torn on this, because leaving Jade as the chairman is bound to generate some delicious drama, but on the other hand I wouldn't want to see CSM completely fail. Supporting.
|

Raphael Scoria
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:32:00 -
[292]
Edited by: Raphael Scoria on 11/06/2008 11:32:56 Those of you who are going along with Jade out of a knee-jerk anti-Goon stance should consider how you'll feel if his power grab succeeds. What if we then don't decide to split our vote next time, and instead corner the God-Emperor chair for ourselves?
|

Sworn Absent
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 11:42:00 -
[293]
Originally by: Raphael Scoria Edited by: Raphael Scoria on 11/06/2008 11:32:56 Those of you who are going along with Jade out of a knee-jerk anti-Goon stance should consider how you'll feel if his power grab succeeds. What if we then don't decide to split our vote next time, and instead corner the God-Emperor chair for ourselves?
What. |

Goumindong
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 12:07:00 -
[294]
Originally by: Sworn Absent
Originally by: Raphael Scoria Edited by: Raphael Scoria on 11/06/2008 11:32:56 Those of you who are going along with Jade out of a knee-jerk anti-Goon stance should consider how you'll feel if his power grab succeeds. What if we then don't decide to split our vote next time, and instead corner the God-Emperor chair for ourselves?
What.
Had GS not decided to split its vote we would have likely taken the chair. Such the question is posed.
Since its unlikely that GS will go away in the next 5-6 months. And since there is also likely to be another CSM election: "How do you feel about giving the chairs these wide and ridiculous powers when the next person to have them at their disposal will likely be from Goonswarm?" |

Pnuka
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 12:12:00 -
[295]
Originally by: Goumindong
Originally by: Sworn Absent
Originally by: Raphael Scoria Edited by: Raphael Scoria on 11/06/2008 11:32:56 Those of you who are going along with Jade out of a knee-jerk anti-Goon stance should consider how you'll feel if his power grab succeeds. What if we then don't decide to split our vote next time, and instead corner the God-Emperor chair for ourselves?
What.
Had GS not decided to split its vote we would have likely taken the chair. Such the question is posed.
Since its unlikely that GS will go away in the next 5-6 months. And since there is also likely to be another CSM election: "How do you feel about giving the chairs these wide and ridiculous powers when the next person to have them at their disposal will likely be from Goonswarm?"
Chairman Arghy has a nice ring to it. |

Heartstone
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 12:14:00 -
[296]
Edited by: Heartstone on 11/06/2008 12:15:57
Originally by: Goumindong
Had GS not decided to split its vote we would have likely taken the chair. Such the question is posed.
Since its unlikely that GS will go away in the next 5-6 months. And since there is also likely to be another CSM election: "How do you feel about giving the chairs these wide and ridiculous powers when the next person to have them at their disposal will likely be from Goonswarm?"
I personally am all in favour of having a member of goonswarm as the next CSM Chairperson with these powers. As long as the CSM logs remain public. Gouimdong as CSM chair has a nice ring to it. You are going to be standing again I trust?
|

Kalinda Veldrin
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 12:20:00 -
[297]
Originally by: Tolis Irithel I wholeheartedly agree with the OP. Note however that;
1) The OP was suggesting this in the event of "attempts to violate the CSM processes", or "obvious mental illnesses." Extended to a more general concept of "procedural violation" or "physical/mental inability to carry out the job", this makes for a perfectly sensible way of ensuring CSM candidates remain effective. This is not, and should not be, however, a mechanism by which to remove CSM members due to differing views.
2) I disagree that this should be restricted solely to the chairman; in fact, I think ANY CSM representative found violating the processes, or losing their capability, should be subject to a confidence vote. Such votes not to occur more than once within a term, however, in order to prevent nuisance confidence spam.
I agree with this summary and therefore give support to this issue. |

Yorda
Battlestars GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 12:32:00 -
[298]
Originally by: Heartstone
Originally by: Goumindong
Had GS not decided to split its vote we would have likely taken the chair. Such the question is posed.
Since its unlikely that GS will go away in the next 5-6 months. And since there is also likely to be another CSM election: "How do you feel about giving the chairs these wide and ridiculous powers when the next person to have them at their disposal will likely be from Goonswarm?"
I personally am all in favour of having a member of goonswarm as the next CSM Chairperson with these powers. As long as the CSM logs remain public. Gouimdong as CSM chair has a nice ring to it. You are going to be standing again I trust?
I can imagine Darius sitting on a throne at the CSM meeting, completely ignoring everyone and just pushing his own agenda while laughing manically (and just muting everyone so they cant vote). |

lecrotta
lecrotta Corp
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 13:33:00 -
[299]
Edited by: lecrotta on 11/06/2008 13:34:58
Originally by: Sigmorhair
Wow your corp has one member - thanks for letting us know how you really feel alt.
WOW your corp has thousands but you guys did not get anybody on the council  i guess that shows how much regard ppl have and how ppl really feel about you tards.
PS: Scuttle back under your rock on caod goon you do not belong here. |

Venomire
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.11 13:36:00 -
[300]
Edited by: Venomire on 11/06/2008 13:36:35
Originally by: lecrotta
Originally by: Sigmorhair
Wow your corp has one member - thanks for letting us know how you really feel alt.
WOW your corp has thousands but you guys did not get anybody on the council i guess that shows how much regard and how ppl realy fel about you tards.
PS: Scuttle back under your rock on caod goon you do not belong here.
We have two.
edit: removed those smilies, one was quite sufficient. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |