| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

MrZYD
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 12:31:00 -
[151]
|

Dionisius
The Circle STYX.
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 13:23:00 -
[152]
Actually no support to this ideia in the way it is presented. You have actually 9 members, so make it this way,
Extend the vote to ANY member of the council. Majority wins the vote and the next member to take the place should be elected in the following way.
The next candidates that were left out of the council have 3 days to present their ideias again ( in case they still wish to run for a spot ) and on the 4th day a voting is made by people, winner takes the place.
As to the person that got kicked, inability to run for CSM for the next 2 years.
_____________________________________ I am the destroyer of worlds and the also the cokie thief. |

RedLion
Polaris Project Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 14:50:00 -
[153]
Edited by: RedLion on 07/06/2008 14:50:54 Every board who are to be taken seriously should have this option.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |

Svenjabi Xiang
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.07 15:22:00 -
[154]
I'm not voting positive for the referendum.
In all relevant cases of representative democracy cited (U.S. and Parliament), it is not the right, nor is it the privilege, for the populace to initiate either a vote of no confidence, nor a bill of impeachment. That right, and privilege, is reserved for members of the respective bodies.
The populace, in both case, is restricted to editorializing to convince said members to begin that process.
Therefore, I believe it is fair and proper to have this referendum actually stricken from the forum as entirely out-of-order, though, in actuality, it won't be. Individuals interested in due process and proper order will simply ignore this though as another meaningless entry from the peanut gallery.
|

Bane Glorious
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 04:59:00 -
[155]
Considering yesterday's past events, I now support this. |

Erik Amirault
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:16:00 -
[156]
Edited by: Erik Amirault on 09/06/2008 05:22:02 Supporting this.
|

Daveydweeb
Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:18:00 -
[157]
This seems necessary, now.

Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal |

LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:43:00 -
[158]
Fiasco. It's quite sad that he couldn't even hide his bias while acting as a chairman. I understand during the discussions. But it's totally not cool to be so biased while acting as chairman.
|

Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:47:00 -
[159]
After his actions in the most recent meeting, I'm signing this. ------------------ Fix the forums! |

Viktor Amand
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:56:00 -
[160]
Originally by: LaVista Vista Fiasco. It's quite sad that he couldn't even hide his bias while acting as a chairman. I understand during the discussions. But it's totally not cool to be so biased while acting as chairman.
Jade's off the reservation and needs to be reigned in.
|

Joe Starbreaker
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:58:00 -
[161]
I abstain. That counts as a vote of support.
---------------- [insert signature here] |

Anton Marvik
AnTi. Atrocitas
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 05:59:00 -
[162]
I don't think I even need to say anything after the unprofessional BS that Jade showed in the last meeting. 
Something needs to change.
(WOW, this thread has more supports than Jade's "big thread" about blowing up stations, hmm...)
|

LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 06:05:00 -
[163]
Originally by: Anton Marvik I don't think I even need to say anything after the unprofessional BS that Jade showed in the last meeting. 
Something needs to change.
(WOW, this thread has more supports than Jade's "big thread" about blowing up stations, hmm...)
I'm fairly suprised that one even HIT the meeting. While I would LIKE to discuss the options or things which could have the same effect, I think that the amount of support shown is waaay too low to even justify it reaching the agenda.
While I did vote aye, since it reached the agenda, I still think it was incorrect for it to even reach the agenda. Some issues were much more important and would be of MUCH more interest to the average player.
|

Anton Marvik
AnTi. Atrocitas
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 06:08:00 -
[164]
Originally by: LaVista Vista
I'm fairly suprised that one even HIT the meeting. While I would LIKE to discuss the options or things which could have the same effect, I think that the amount of support shown is waaay too low to even justify it reaching the agenda.
While I did vote aye, since it reached the agenda, I still think it was incorrect for it to even reach the agenda. Some issues were much more important and would be of MUCH more interest to the average player.
I was surprised, myself. Perhaps there needs to be clarification on the minimum required support for an issue to make it to a formal vote?
|

Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 06:18:00 -
[165]
Originally by: Anton Marvik
Originally by: LaVista Vista
I'm fairly suprised that one even HIT the meeting. While I would LIKE to discuss the options or things which could have the same effect, I think that the amount of support shown is waaay too low to even justify it reaching the agenda.
While I did vote aye, since it reached the agenda, I still think it was incorrect for it to even reach the agenda. Some issues were much more important and would be of MUCH more interest to the average player.
I was surprised, myself. Perhaps there needs to be clarification on the minimum required support for an issue to make it to a formal vote?
It's pretty clear as-is - unless one of these threads hits ~11000 thumbs, it's a straw poll, and no more. It's CSM member support that dictates agenda appearances, not public support. Now, they'd have to be idiots to ignore public support generally, but I'll even accept it in the case of platform commitments, which is what that issue was. I can't tell you offhand what the other 8 successful platforms were, but if other reps want to ram through their main election issues onto the agenda, even with low levels of support, I see nothing wrong with that. Frankly, they'd be disenfranchising their voters if they didn't. ------------------ Fix the forums! |

Tiger Delivery
THE INTERNET.
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:01:00 -
[166]
As much as I think Darius was also out of line, Jade is just plain crazy.
Kick them both and restore balance and peace to the council!
|

Ceros X
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:37:00 -
[167]
jade is a useless moron with delusions of grandeur get him off my council
|

Jasharin
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:40:00 -
[168]
i have nothing but the utmost faith in jade constantine
|

EdFromHumanResources
BobFromMarketing's Alt
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:48:00 -
[169]
Welp, he was just as delusional as I feared he would be. ------------------------------------------------- Everyone hates goonswarm for one reason or another. ... And they promote****gotism -Zurrar
|

Rashonna
2H Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:48:00 -
[170]
he's off his rocker
|

Gorfob
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:48:00 -
[171]
Edited by: Gorfob on 09/06/2008 08:48:30 Jade you are a total rear end in a top hat. I support your removal.
|

Laerise
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:51:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Ceros X jade is a useless moron with delusions of grandeur get him off my council
I agree with a GS member, uh oh
|

Theramin Dogon
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:52:00 -
[173]
Thumbs up for Hamlet
|

Anthony Pants
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:53:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Laerise
Originally by: Ceros X jade is a useless moron with delusions of grandeur get him off my council
I agree with a GS member, uh oh
I don't know how this is supposed to be surprising but vOv
|

Jasharin
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 08:56:00 -
[175]
Originally by: Anthony Pants
Originally by: Laerise
Originally by: Ceros X jade is a useless moron with delusions of grandeur get him off my council
I agree with a GS member, uh oh
I don't know how this is supposed to be surprising but vOv
ugh, the goons are ruining this game with their skilless blob warfare and constant undermining of the csm.
i mean come on guys, ccp try to do something new and unique and the red goon federation has to go **** all over them for it???
|

Abel Tasman
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:00:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Ceros X jade is a useless moron with delusions of grandeur get him off my council
yeah
|

Lithyia Theia
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:12:00 -
[177]
why is it 99% goonswarm members doing thumbs up in this thread and barely no others?
|

EdFromHumanResources
BobFromMarketing's Alt
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:18:00 -
[178]
Originally by: Lithyia Theia why is it 99% goonswarm members doing thumbs up in this thread and barely no others?
Because while most alliances have a small segment that browse forums avidely, goons coming from somethingawful.com FORUMS all tend to do this. So there's more of us than your average alliance :) ------------------------------------------------- Everyone hates goonswarm for one reason or another. ... And they promote****gotism -Zurrar
|

Waterfowl Democracy
The Ministry of Indigenous Affairs GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:19:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Lithyia Theia why is it 99% goonswarm members doing thumbs up in this thread and barely no others?
Maybe the other people posting in the thread are incapable of reading a chatlog.
|

Windjammer
|
Posted - 2008.06.09 09:25:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Lithyia Theia why is it 99% goonswarm members doing thumbs up in this thread and barely no others?
Because goons don't like having anyone other than one of their own as chair of the CSM and resent any attempt for the chair to act like one. i.e. moderate the freakin meeting.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |