EVE Search - Predictions on "Incursion Iteration" coming in Pre-Inferno Patch

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Predictions on "Incursion Iteration" coming in Pre-Inferno Patch

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 17:50:00 - [1] - Quote John Lander just announced "Iteration on Incursions" coming in the pre-patch (April) SOOO what are your predictions? I will start: Scout sites get a boost Vanguards will not be blitzed in 3min. Assault/HQ changes (no idea)
Ana'Gia Pink Bunny Club 1	Posted - 2012.03.24 17:57:00 - [2] - Quote VG nerf. The intresting thing will be the new modules coming oout on the next expansion. John Lander promised big chances in fleet composations.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2075	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:13:00 - [3] - Quote Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:17:00 - [4] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. So you think CCP is going to mandate players shoot each other to gain the incursion rewards?? Would be interesting
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2075	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:22:00 - [5] - Quote Zircon Dasher wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. So you think CCP is going to mandate players shoot each other to gain the incursion rewards?? Would be interesting I don't really care about the mechanics but people shouldn't be able to make that much isk in a risk-free environment. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:26:00 - [6] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Zircon Dasher wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. So you think CCP is going to mandate players shoot each other to gain the incursion rewards?? Would be interesting I don't really care about the mechanics but people shouldn't be able to make that much isk in a risk-free environment. CCP should be forced to provide risk in EVE. Since highsec is risk free we obviously cannot leave it up to the players themselves. Sandboxes are dumb amirite?
DarthNefarius Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen 91	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:27:00 - [7] - Quote Zircon Dasher wrote: John Lander just announced "Iteration on Incursions" coming in the pre-patch (April) SOOO what are your predictions? I will start: Scout sites get a boost Vanguards will not be blitzed in 3min. Assault/HQ changes (no idea) I missed hearing ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING being said about Incursions! What time was this mentioned ???? Maybe Iteration means that there will be a new pirate faction or Sleeper Incursion? Maybe a Jovian Incursion will replace Sansha after a Sansha Titan gets taken down I hopes :) it-+er-+a-+tionGÇé GÇé/-î+¬t+Ö-êre+¬-â+Ön/ Show Spelled[it-uh-rey-shuhn] Show IPA noun 1. the act of repeating; a repetition. 2. Mathematics . a. Also called successive approximation. a problem-solving or computational method in which a succession of approximations, each building on the one preceding, is used to achieve a desired degree of accuracy. b. an instance of the use of this method. 3. Computers . a repetition of a statement or statements in a program.
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:31:00 - [8] - Quote DarthNefarius wrote: I missed hearing ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING being said about Incursions! What time was this mentioned ???? Did not get a time stamp, but (iirc) it was the only time Lander talked today. And don't worry about missing "content". There was none.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2076	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:33:00 - [9] - Quote Zircon Dasher wrote: CCP should be forced to provide risk in EVE. Since highsec is risk free we obviously cannot leave it up to the players themselves. That's not what I said at all. If players want to play in a risk-free environment I don't care but they shouldn't be able to easily make billions of isk doing it. High risk - high reward Low risk - low reward It's simple. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Endeavour Starfleet 723	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:34:00 - [10] - Quote My guess? Tagging shortcut and more HQ sites. Vanguards wont be "nerfed" as so many have lied to try to get done. Perhaps HQ payout boost.
Cipher Jones 379	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:37:00 - [11] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. I thought you said tech moons for a minute. cipher jones, alone and unloved after his campaign against the evil goonies, resorts to stealing their techniques to become loved
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2078	Posted - 2012.03.24 18:43:00 - [12] - Quote Cipher Jones wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully high sec incursions will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. I thought you said tech moons for a minute. Yeah nobody fights over tech moons... The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
DarthNefarius Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen 92	Posted - 2012.03.24 19:01:00 - [13] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Cipher Jones wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully TECH MOONS will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet they are today. Lucky we got a decent CSM to deal with the issue. I thought you said incursions for a minute. Yeah nobody fights over tech moons... And no players ships go poof in Incursions because there is no risk
Mimiru Minahiro Republic University Minmatar Republic 5	Posted - 2012.03.24 20:59:00 - [14] - Quote It would be sweet if they weighted the spawning mechanic to favor low or null.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2098	Posted - 2012.03.24 21:01:00 - [15] - Quote DarthNefarius wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Cipher Jones wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully TECH MOONS will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet , ATM machines they are today. Lucky we got a CSM to deal with the issue. I thought you said incursions for a minute. Yeah nobody fights over tech moons... And no players ships go poof in Incursions because there is no risk Correct. Assuming you're talking about high sec incursions. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Xorv Questionable Acquisitions 196	Posted - 2012.03.24 21:08:00 - [16] - Quote Vanguards nerfed certainly, but if CCP has any sense of balance they will inject PvP into High Sec Incursions or remove them altogether.
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 21:17:00 - [17] - Quote Mimiru Minahiro wrote: It would be sweet if they weighted the spawning mechanic to favor low or null. Why? That would just decrease participation in one of the few PVE content lines that works.
Selinate 695	Posted - 2012.03.24 21:18:00 - [18] - Quote Ana'Gia wrote: VG nerf. The intresting thing will be the new modules coming oout on the next expansion. John Lander promised big chances in fleet composations. The fleet UI itself need help. Badly. The interface for the fleet window is so impenetrable for new users that it's a HUGE turnoff.
gfldex 394	Posted - 2012.03.24 21:29:00 - [19] - Quote Vans will get nerfed to a point where they are pointless. Assaults will be boosted without trying to min/max them before release. As a result the whining will be ENDLESS, as usual and folk will make even more ISK in a risk free environment that doesn't work well with wars and kill rights. When wardecs get boosted the whining will be ENDLESS and pretty much any Incursioneed will drop back into NPC corps after they all went into the same corp to make wardecs insanely expensive. The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson
DarthNefarius 94	Posted - 2012.03.24 22:16:00 - [20] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: And no players ships ever go poof in Incursions because there is no risk Correct. Assuming you're talking about high sec incursions. Ha now I can call you a bald face liar. is your wallet blinking from my membership deposit yet Goonie? To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally"
Aethlyn 102	Posted - 2012.03.24 22:26:00 - [21] - Quote Guess they'll lower vanguards a bit while increasing scouts a bit - i.e. bringing them closer together. But other than that, I wouldn't expect huge changes. Could as well think of them trying to seed in random encounters to incursions to drop some of the new modules (that are said to be possibly dropped in incursions). Looking for more thoughts? Read my blog or follow me on Twitter.
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3387	Posted - 2012.03.24 22:28:00 - [22] - Quote DarthNefarius wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Cipher Jones wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Hopefully TECH MOONS will no longer be the risk-free isk faucet , ATM machines they are today. Lucky we got a CSM to deal with the issue. I thought you said incursions for a minute. Yeah nobody fights over tech moons... And no players ships go poof in Incursions because there is no risk dying to rats of any kind isn't "risk" it's stupidity learn the difference "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Andski GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3387	Posted - 2012.03.24 22:33:00 - [23] - Quote "Guys there is SO MUCH RISK high-sec incursion running i'm not even kidding, sometimes logi pilots are drunk/afk and we lose ships. Oh what officer mods should i get for the Nightmare I fly in this high-risk PvE?" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012
Vimsy Vortis Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation 398	Posted - 2012.03.24 22:40:00 - [24] - Quote The only legitimate risk in EVE is provided by players. PVE isn't risky unless players able to kill you while you are doing it.
DarthNefarius 94	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:26:00 - [25] - Quote Vimsy Vortis wrote: The only legitimate risk in EVE is provided by players. PVE isn't risky unless players able to kill you while you are doing it. lol legitmate risk lol illegimate risk is whatever u call it lol... lets all start defining risk as whatever the next troll calls it or the 2 preivous troll posts To the whiners : CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally"
Vimsy Vortis Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation 400	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:29:00 - [26] - Quote You sound like a smart guy with a well reasoned opinion.
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2109	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:31:00 - [27] - Quote DarthNefarius wrote: Vimsy Vortis wrote: The only legitimate risk in EVE is provided by players. PVE isn't risky unless players able to kill you while you are doing it. lol legitmate risk lol illegimate risk is whatever u call it lol... lets all start defining risk as whatever the next troll calls it or the 2 preivous troll posts Tell us how risky high sec is. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Zircon Dasher 87	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:38:00 - [28] - Quote Ladie Harlot wrote: Tell us how risky high sec is. Jita is where the largest amount of BOOM happens according to Econ Presentation. Just sayin'
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 2110	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:41:00 - [29] - Quote Zircon Dasher wrote: Ladie Harlot wrote: Tell us how risky high sec is. Jita is where the largest amount of BOOM happens according to Econ Presentation. Just sayin' How many incursions have spawned in Jita? The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Kendra Wilkinson State War Academy Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.03.24 23:42:00 - [30] - Quote cauz really your 0.0 are risky when you farming like pigz? with cyno jam, the 20 large bbl T2 n each gate, the afk cloak? you are just mad to not be able to gank ppl without risk like you do with miners. so shut up and return in your cave

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.