Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
292
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 21:41:00 -
[31] - Quote
As a casual gamer myself, I say no to safe havens. CCP made it clear that only the few newbie starter systems can be safe in some sense but those systems are quickly abandoned even by the newbies because there it's no profit, at least not the sort they are looking for. Once the newbies leave those worthless systems, they are fair game and must learn to survive on their own like I did when I left the starter systems for the first time. I fell for the old can baits, I lost a bunch of ships, some due to neutral reps, and I was even ganked multiple times while mining. Did I quit? **** no. I pushed along and adapted. I never went back to any other mmo because those didn't offer the kind of player-driven interaction that EVE online offers. Not only that, this game truly does live up to it's reputation as a hard game. And besides, to each their own because there will never be an mmo that will satisfy everybody. Welcome to Eve Online. Don't expect people to be nice to you. |

Gunrunner1775
EVENT HORIZON'S The First Blood
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 21:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
as far as SoE, was refering to everquest game to the planes of power/gates of discord expansions that were tailored to the raider group only, witnessed a serious decline in population in that game, and yea, SWG went wacked when they changed it up in fall of 04, i even quit then |

baltec1
1050
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 21:42:00 -
[33] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:[ They haven't grown for a year and are launching very agressive offers to drive new players.
Dispite the events of last year EVE did grow, just not as rappidly as other years. |

Ty Fox
Risk Breakers C0NVICTED
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 21:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:Ty Fox wrote:First off, I think this thread is entirely a troll, but against my better judgment I'm posting my 0.02 isk.
Let's say you have a store in your town that offers sandwiches, you can have ANY kind of sandwich under the sun, and people enjoy the shop because they can get whatever the hell they want between two pieces of bread. What happens when the shop decides to forbid wacky sandwich combinations? Their reputation changes and they become just another shop, much like EVE would become just another MMO. EVE is a specialty MMO in that there is no real right or wrong way to play it, and preventing people from making the decision to gank someone in hisec just because the victim of the gank might have their feelings hurt is just absurd. It's not the notion of taking out hisec ganking that would disturb EVE players, it's telling the players they can't do something.
Personally, I think carebears need to HTFU, but that's been repeated ad nauseum in threads like this. Let's say you have a store in town, but a block away from getting there, a handful of hoodlums jump you and steal your money! Then, let's say you report that to the appropriate authorities. The cops set up an ambush, they net the anti-socials. The sandwich guy gets to sell his sandwiches. You get to buy them. They go to jail to think to themselves how smart they are...for a few years. Yeah. Good analogy.
The variety in sandwiches was more or less my representation of EVE being a "have it your way" type of game, not a representation of carebears and their relation to suicide gankers. There ARE counters to gankers, you know. Fitting a better tank, having appropriate intel, even monitoring D scan every now and then would help. |

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra Gallente Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 21:56:00 -
[35] - Quote
The thing is I'm an industrialist. I build guns for anybody that wants to buy them. I don't have a problem with gankers, but Vyl Vit, seems to be crying up a storm about them. Why such vitriol? Did one of your alts get ganked? That which does not kill you, makes you stronger.-á Friedrich Nietzsche
That which does not kill you, hurts like hell.-á UNKNOWN |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
444
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:09:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ty Fox wrote:Vyl Vit wrote:Ty Fox wrote:First off, I think this thread is entirely a troll, but against my better judgment I'm posting my 0.02 isk.
Let's say you have a store in your town that offers sandwiches, you can have ANY kind of sandwich under the sun, and people enjoy the shop because they can get whatever the hell they want between two pieces of bread. What happens when the shop decides to forbid wacky sandwich combinations? Their reputation changes and they become just another shop, much like EVE would become just another MMO. EVE is a specialty MMO in that there is no real right or wrong way to play it, and preventing people from making the decision to gank someone in hisec just because the victim of the gank might have their feelings hurt is just absurd. It's not the notion of taking out hisec ganking that would disturb EVE players, it's telling the players they can't do something.
Personally, I think carebears need to HTFU, but that's been repeated ad nauseum in threads like this. Let's say you have a store in town, but a block away from getting there, a handful of hoodlums jump you and steal your money! Then, let's say you report that to the appropriate authorities. The cops set up an ambush, they net the anti-socials. The sandwich guy gets to sell his sandwiches. You get to buy them. They go to jail to think to themselves how smart they are...for a few years. Yeah. Good analogy. The variety in sandwiches was more or less my representation of EVE being a "have it your way" type of game, not a representation of carebears and their relation to suicide gankers. There ARE counters to gankers, you know. Fitting a better tank, having appropriate intel, even monitoring D scan every now and then would help.
Let's say that every time you go to the sandwich shop a gang steals some of your money and sandwiches.
Now let's say that the law says that you are entitled to steal their money and sandwiches if you can, but you can't put them in jail, you can't beat them, you can't scare the sh*t of them and you can't kill them. You must take that they will steal you forever as the powers that be want a city were crime is fun and has no consequences.
I don't know you, but I would leave the city...
...and then would bring back an army and would burn in a stake every last SOB until they learned to fear Civilization.  EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 15% Nullsec; 72% Highsec. CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
540
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:22:00 -
[37] - Quote
How about a town with this sandwhich shop where everyone can carry a gun. In this town some of the less savory folks have a big yellow sign on their head "Bad Person". You can shoot them before they mug you and before the police have to get involved.
That sounds better than safe zones, and a whole lot more fun. |

Pop Bear
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:27:00 -
[38] - Quote
nice troll 0/10
Yeah lets ruin the game and make Eve easy because some people are stupid and can't fugure out how to protect themselves in the safest part of space!!! |

Gunrunner1775
EVENT HORIZON'S The First Blood
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote: How about a town with this sandwhich shop where everyone can carry a gun. In this town some of the less savory folks have a big yellow sign on their head "Bad Person". You can shoot them before they mug you and before the police have to get involved.
That sounds better than safe zones, and a whole lot more fun.
now that i could not agree with more |

baltec1
1051
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Personally If Iwas getting a sammich in that city I would pull up in the drivethrough in one of these. |
|

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
207
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Then do it. Civilize highsec.
It's not hard to know who the most high-profile griefers are, and getting rid of them would give less inspiration to the moderates.
It wouldn't eradicate ganking, but it would severly curtail it.
... come at me, bro? |

Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpayed Tactical Team
429
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 22:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
blackbugsblood wrote:maybe you should make your own super safe space game. im sure it would be a great success
WHAT IN THE HELL. FACE? YOUR!
|

Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
87
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 23:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:There's no reason in the world why the five major types of play in EVE can't continue unabated. The place is big enough with room to spare. Calling yourself a "ganker" probably makes you feel pretty cool. But, people who "gank" have been with us since we came out of the trees. There's no special talent to it. Find someone who can't defend themselves and torture them to feel some internal gratification that resonates like the Beevis and Butthead snigger. We dealt with them then...just yank a knot in the top of their heads, and keep an eye on them. If they continue...well, it's not a pretty sight, but for the greater good, and nobody was cryin' at the "loss". So, these morons found a place on the internet where they can "virtually" do it, get their snigger, and nobody can smack 'em upside the head. Whoopteedoo. Let me know when you think of something new.
The crime/punishment dynamic of EVE does much to if not prevent this sort of perennial turd in the punchbowl, make them pay for doing it. But, it can do much more. If CCP likes its money, when it errs, it best err on the side of the credit card. When we "play" we're supposed to be having "FUN." Gankers may be having their poor excuse for fun, but it's obviously one-sided. If they're ten percent of the population, it's a ten percent CCP can indeed do without. (Gankers have a hard time with math. They can't comprehend one person driving ten people to finding something else to do. Those ten telling a friend who has it all their way here, making 20 who don't pay, while the ganker pays in PLEX.) This isn't difficult to understand...unless you're a ganker, and those people don't understand much anyway. You'll be able to tell by their eloquent responses on this thread...hint, hint.
The main question is: Why aren't gankers out in low and null sec attacking people that can ably fight back? That's obvious enough, too. They're CHICKEN. They suck at the game, and they'd have their @$$3$ handed to them by people who actually KNOW how to fight, and win. They'd rather pad a killboard for their adolescently-minded buddies to gurgle over. Considering they can't get dates, and have nothing to brag about in that arena, you can see why this is a big deal to them, of course. If you want to GANK somebody, please...man up and gank somebody in Bosena, or Amamake. Those who know don't have to say, those who don't say "Huh? Wha?"
Hi / Lo / Null There's plenty of people doing what you like to do. Go do it with them and put some real challenge in your life. OR, pick on defenseless n00bs and be seen as the Beavis and Buttheads you are. We all make choices in life.
CCP needs to choose either money, or sophomoric behavior. So far, they've proven to be pretty sophmoric themselves. It's nice to see an intelligent post from someone who "gets it".
With CCP teaming up with Sony, we're about to see massive growth in Eve from the DUST born rather than childish idiots from anti-social niche communities. Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |

Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
87
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 23:06:00 -
[44] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing.
There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided.
Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
541
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 23:48:00 -
[45] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided.
Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. Guess what will happen, the gankers will cry and bleat and scream about how concord doesn't protect them enough. |

Htrag
The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 01:46:00 -
[46] - Quote
Speaking for the -10 contingent.... we simply pop whatever is presented to us... hauler... fraction battleship its all good.
If u cant hack getting your uninsured crap ganked because you jumped unscouted into lowsec, we didn't want you any way. Whatever "dev" it was that removed the pod squish sound probably never even logged into the game. |

Htrag
The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 01:51:00 -
[47] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:
The main question is: Why aren't gankers out in low and null sec attacking people that can ably fight back? That's obvious enough, too. They're CHICKEN. They suck at the game, and they'd have their @$$3$ handed to them by people who actually KNOW how to fight, and win.
Well because we simply blow you up regardless because we're better. Whatever "dev" it was that removed the pod squish sound probably never even logged into the game. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
156
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 01:56:00 -
[48] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vyl Vit wrote:
And Other Urban Myths...let me know when your book comes out.
SOE made SWG safe for all. It died a month later.
Really? So all that time is wasnt dead from when the NGE etc came out till what last November were imaginary? Drastically reduced population, yes, dead, not from what I saw
Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
165
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 01:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Gunrunner1775 wrote:present a logical counter argument then, im more then willing to listen to all sides EVE Online has seen continued subscription growth since launch.
There, I just defeated your arguments in one stroke. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
156
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 01:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided. Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. .
hell yes
Lapine Davion wrote:Gunrunner1775 wrote:present a logical counter argument then, im more then willing to listen to all sides EVE Online has seen continued subscription growth since launch. There, I just defeated your arguments in one stroke.
So that flat spot ppl were bitching about during the summer of rage and all the graphs and such they showed that had a plateau where there used to be growth here were wrong then? Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you. |
|

Htrag
The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:00:00 -
[51] - Quote
Richard Hammond II wrote:Adunh Slavy wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided. Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. . hell yes
You're just talking about a game machanic change that wont make you any better. All things being equal you still get blowed up. Whatever "dev" it was that removed the pod squish sound probably never even logged into the game. |

Htrag
The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:04:00 -
[52] - Quote
Gunrunner1775 wrote:im not saying get rid of PVP, but i am saying that the implimentation of the security measures to protect players from ganking/greifing or what ever you want to call it have been poorly implimented. its hard to stop a suicide bomber
Well you could use basic situational awareness which applies to every second you're in space anywhere. Whatever "dev" it was that removed the pod squish sound probably never even logged into the game. |

Jita Alt666
998
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:10:00 -
[53] - Quote
OP:
The typical MMO market is not the Eve market: 1. Eve is the only product that relies on a player driven economy 2. Eve is the only single shard game with over 5000 people online simultaneously 3. Eve is the only game where you are not safe anywhere Comparing Eve Online to other MMO's leads one to make false connections. CCP learned this almost 10 months ago.
CCP is a thriving company (when they do not over invest in other products). A thriving niche company does not need to nor should it aspire to become the biggest thing out. Eve fills a niche market. It does so well enough to almost have a complete monopoly on that market. By attempting to become the biggest MMO out (you compared the game to WOW by stating Blizzard is successful and then stating CCP need to survive) CCP will lose their roots. Eve will not be Eve any more just another lame wow clone.
|

Jita Alt666
998
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:12:00 -
[54] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided. Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. Guess what will happen, the gankers will cry and bleat and scream about how concord doesn't protect them enough.
+2 - -2 is to close.
+5 - -5 works much better. You want to kill baddies grind your way up, just like the baddies have to do if they want to lose their -10. |

Panacani
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:14:00 -
[55] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided. Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. Guess what will happen, the gankers will cry and bleat and scream about how concord doesn't protect them enough.
Creates a whole new career in Eve and puts the onus on the carebear to protect his own. Best idea I've read on these forums in ever. |

Kessiaan
Greater Order Of Destruction Happy Endings
153
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
Gunrunner1775 wrote:It is a well-known that casual gamers (and for the most part, the care bears are casual gamers) are the DOMINANT population in the MMO community.
This is a myth. All of WoW's contemporaries save EvE killed themselves trying to court casual gamers who weren't interested in playing anything other than WoW. EvE is still standing (thriving even, for the most part) because of what it is, not in spite of it.
My killboard - http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Kessiaan |

Rory Orlenard
University of Caille Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
I've been waiting for this post..thank you ! Eve being a universe where all players are on one server means that there is an upper limit on how many accounts can be active at one time, even with the progress CCP has made. Eve is also a different game then the popular mmo's and that is not an accident. My opinion on this matter is that CCP doesn't want to be a WoW mmo, they keep track of how many subscribers they have and the current trend in subscriptions. CCP probably knows it's maximum users and really doesn't want more. ( A good reason for another game - such as Dust to expand and increase revenue.) CCP watches comers and goers and balances that with thier "optimum" Eve accounts. When Eve was in trouble after Incarnagate Hilmar reacted. I don't think Eve is in danger of turning into WoW or in danger of dieing - because there will always be a certain number of people who find thier way past the usual WoW clone. Pretty much what you have with Eve is a niche game for a limited number of sick bastards like us that balances itself. |

Thomas Orca
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:21:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:
+5 - -5 works much better. You want to kill baddies grind your way up, just like the baddies have to do if they want to lose their -10.
Oh wait it's already like that but without the grinding! |

Htrag
The Carebear Stare Hydroponic Zone
35
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:22:00 -
[59] - Quote
Panacani wrote:Adunh Slavy wrote:Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:Then do it. Civilize highsec. Impossible. The game mechanics allow for ganking, they don't allow for civilizing. There is no lasting consequence to someone who ganks. But being ganked has consequences that cannot be avoided. Sure there is, He's a simple one, allow anyone that is +2 or above shoot anyone that is -2 or below. Have this not be considered a criminal act. Guess what will happen, the gankers will cry and bleat and scream about how concord doesn't protect them enough. Creates a whole new career in Eve and puts the onus on the carebear to protect his own. Best idea I've read on these forums in ever. This idea should have it's own thread.
You know what I love about Eve?.
Theres so many carebears and moral justice advocates that try to apply some type of different logic how the game actually works, particularly in regards to their own shortcomings.
"If I can't survive, lets change the rules"
No dude, harden yourself up or find a new game. That's how we roll. Whatever "dev" it was that removed the pod squish sound probably never even logged into the game. |

Jita Alt666
998
|
Posted - 2012.04.08 02:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
Thomas Orca wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:
+5 - -5 works much better. You want to kill baddies grind your way up, just like the baddies have to do if they want to lose their -10.
Oh wait it's already like that but without the grinding!
Oh it works fine with a neutral orca alt in system. Just when you wanna cruise around mindlessly it gets harder. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |