Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
981. Post-NOS nerf Curse setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 05/08/2007 13:15:03 AB -> you'll die vs the first average gatecamp t2 neuts -> unstable kill as much cap, have a far better energyefficiency and an easier fitting arbalest launchers -> t2 have ~10% more dps eve...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 13:12:00
|
982. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: LvxOccvlta Originally by: Aramendel Originally by: LvxOccvlta But there is no reason to sacrifice two of Amarr's good ships. They could give Amarr recons a Neut bonus that reduces cap usage 99% or something s...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 12:15:00
|
983. Remote Sensor Dampener Change Proposal - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 05/08/2007 11:11:43 Originally by: achoura My arazu currently requires 3 damps + 2 rigs to bring a sensor boosting bs below 20km. Only if it fits 3 sensorboosters. Or 2 sensorboosters for 2 ships: scorpion a...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 11:05:00
|
984. The new mass increasing module - WTF happens to minmatar? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: roadrage639 Why does the module say Mass Reduction 100%.. Doesn't that make the target..... smaller ? The attribute description is wrong, should be "mass modifier". If you look at the polycarbon rigs you'll see that ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 10:28:00
|
985. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: LvxOccvlta But there is no reason to sacrifice two of Amarr's good ships. They could give Amarr recons a Neut bonus that reduces cap usage 99% or something similar. By using such rediculous numbers the only thing you a...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 10:16:00
|
986. Remote Sensor Dampener Change Proposal - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 05/08/2007 09:59:59 Originally by: n0thing Damps dont need nerf, its ECM that needs boost for their native boats. Tbh, if drakes and scorps fit damps, they fit em for a reason ECM doesnt cut it for them. And th...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 09:57:00
|
987. Apoc and Zealot suggestions for SISI - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 05/08/2007 02:24:03 A 5th turret would make it too strong for snipersetups with beams. It is fine there really. Its problems are shortrange with a pulse setup.
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 02:24:00
|
988. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Fager Well if you want to compare ECM to CAPwarfare there are som more points to consider. ... Mostly correct, a few points are wrong or unneeded here however. Doesnt stop F.O.F or to some extent drones. - applies for...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.05 02:08:00
|
989. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 21:01:45 Originally by: Maya Rkell Makes perfect sense. A jammed target loses no ability to use modules. A cap-drained target does. Utterly, completely wrong. A jammed target cannot use all module...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 20:58:00
|
990. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell Did I say Hugin? No, I did not. I was talking about a hypothetical ship. Try again. Exept we are not talking about "hypothetical ships" we are talking about existing ships. Quote: But the rook won't mak...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 20:20:00
|
991. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Fager A Curse using a 800 can waste more then 800 from his enemie using 800. Gives advantage in Cap war witch it fights and also not all enemies uses 800 and when they dont you got even more advantage. And with the general u...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 20:07:00
|
992. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Fager Originally by: Aramendel It has a disadvantage vs the other recons vs med+ gangs. It is not useless there, but it is less effective than its alternatives. What previously made up for this disadvantage was its ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 18:31:00
|
993. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 17:33:17 Originally by: Maya Rkell You're arguing that a ship can destroy any frigate in 1 second but cannot harm cruisers and battleships is balanced? Again, that's specalisation and not balance. ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 17:30:00
|
994. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 16:31:32 Originally by: Maya Rkell That's not balance, it's a specalisation. Big difference. And it pays for this specialisation by being worse in other areas. How is that not balanced? Quot...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 16:28:00
|
995. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 16:03:26 Originally by: Maya Rkell Ding! Correct, the curse is now balanced with the other recons. Change ++ Server rollback. Try reading the whole post. Right now it is better solo, about equal...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 15:57:00
|
996. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 15:53:15 Originally by: Shadowsword But I think you're underestimating it in a fleet support role: First, a fleet isn't only interceptors and sniping battleships, there's also a lot of HAS, command sh...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 15:48:00
|
997. Solution for Curse and Pilgrim: - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 15:26:44 1800 alpha. Talisman decrease ROF, do not increase power. This means you need for an average BS 3-4 activations, aka 24-36 seconds. Talisman will speed it up, but I do not really think that faction i...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 15:26:00
|
998. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Aramendel on 04/08/2007 13:59:15 Originally by: Shadowsword The Nano-Curse won't be a solopwn machine anymore, but a standard Curse will remain a superb EW/general support platform, to have around in small gangs or fleets ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 13:56:00
|
999. Solution for Curse and Pilgrim: - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Not quite. See. The curse can use the timing of its modules to drain cap. Activate your nos right after the MWD hits and pop you can drain them from 33% to 20% while boosting yourself back up to 33%. Then neut aga...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 13:05:00
|
1000. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Grytok When will this Amarr-Recon-Whining stop? When people who have no experience with those ships stop posting that they are "not hurt in the slightest". Quote: This patch will hurt the Curse not the slightest. ...
- by Aramendel - at 2007.08.04 12:31:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |