| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
141. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Exlegion The possibilities to create obsolete T3 cruisers that are more often then not worse then Tech I cruisers are almost endless. fixed
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 15:20:00
|
142. Feedback on T3 slot layout... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
why would you ever want to fly a ship without low slots? It will be slow, having low damage and no usefull mods like damage control or energy/grid management. Also no way to boost ecm. So whats left? 8 slot shield tank without cpu to fill the slot...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 15:10:00
|
143. Stealh bomber love in new datadisk (?) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
why dont you give up? ccp did
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 14:46:00
|
144. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Dont worry, everything will get fixed. Remember how Blackops and Stealthbombers got there much needed balancing!
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 08:01:00
|
145. Feedback on T3 slot layout... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
They had that design in the first build, every Hull had stats and slots. I dont know why they changed that, because it worked great. Sure, i had still some ships with only 1 Med slot, but that was amarr damage config, no problem there. The slot mo...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 07:57:00
|
146. zomg I cant kill the sleepers in my lolwtfuberfaction deadspace BS - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This Topic fails. 1) Navy Ravens are used by Missionrunners 2) Missionrunners want maximum safety with maximum profit possible 3) So they run Missions in Highsec 4) W-Space has zero protection, zero local intel tools and the attacker has a huge ...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.24 07:47:00
|
147. New Dev Blog: How the AI pew pews the player - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
awesome. cant wait to see all the cnr killmails
- by Perry - at 2009.02.23 12:41:00
|
148. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Since ccp has managed to create Tech II Battleships which are actually worse then their Tech I hulls, i have little hope in Tech III living up to expectations...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.22 21:15:00
|
149. Best Caldari T3, Permaboost, 70-87 resists all around, 205 m/s 110km - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
funny, the next build will render this topic moot
- by Perry - at 2009.02.22 19:41:00
|
150. Nerf Tengu - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Okay today i was on my dayly roaming through fd-mlj and encountered a tengu. I thought: nom nom nice T3 ship, ill kill it! WRONG! It was so strong i went down so fast! And i was in my gank Thorax! That shouldnt happen, EVER! It had like the best ...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.22 17:44:00
|
151. I'm done with the Hyena, I'm not flying it again until it's fixed. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
what did ya expect from a ship with a target painter bonus?
- by Perry - at 2009.02.22 10:26:00
|
152. T3 now inofficially garbage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: korrey The role of T3 is this: a. Billy has a gank fitted T3 ship. b. Uh oh, more enemies just arrived. c. Billy docks, changes a few things, and undocks with a falcon. fixed
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 23:04:00
|
153. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After playing around with all races T3 Cruisers i think that the Bonus are too weak in some areas and the slots too extreme in most cases. For example, the Afterburner Bonus is on a relativ slow subsystem for Caldari, canceling it out. Dont do th...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 22:37:00
|
154. Current Wormhole Location - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I got a Wormhole in MY-4PP13
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 21:17:00
|
155. T3 now inofficially garbage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I tried to build a Tengu thats better then a Moa/Eagle, but with only + 5% Optimal Range avaiable its fail from the beginning. I really hope they change that to +10%. And no, adding an offensive Subsystem with +10% optimal would not be better, cau...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 21:04:00
|
156. T3 is for the elite. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Perry on 21/02/2009 13:24:54 Originally by: Nova Fox gotta remember Tech 3 ships have 6 bonuses like warp time reduction, repair cap reduction and agility...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 13:24:00
|
157. T3 is for the elite. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
From what ive seen on the testserver ill stick to my Zealot and Curse, thank you.
- by Perry - at 2009.02.21 13:18:00
|
158. T3 now inofficially garbage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
im trying to swap but it seems bugged, for example i try to combine amarr offensive 1 with engineering 1 (which should result in 7 Turrets), but i only get 5, no matter what other subsystems are present. Hidden malus somewhere or bug... ill report...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.20 16:28:00
|
159. T3 now inofficially garbage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Disclaimer: This Topic is a response to the recent changes to T3 stats with the latest build: Yesterday i had a Legion (11111) with 6 Turrets, 1 Med Slot (yeah...) and 7 Low Slots, with a nice 25mn Bandwith with 50mb bay. In combination with its ...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.20 16:11:00
|
160. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon just don't fit it unless your using an active tank set up. that's the POINT. If i fit for active tank i use the one with the repair amount bonus to actually survive the damage done to my ship. Thank you very ...
- by Perry - at 2009.02.20 15:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |