| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
41. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Nerfing the Proteus in that case mean you have to make a choice instead of selecting the obvious best answer in your proposed list. Cade Windstalker wrote: That's ridiculous and an absolutely blind way of approach...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.18 20:44:46
|
42. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Need a fleet combat ship with lots of EHP? Screw a battleship (those just get bombed, even if you have defender missile dessies with you), get a Proteus or a Tengu. This is the thing though - we looked at it a lot becaus...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.18 14:54:15
|
43. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Those players will either go off looking for something else to abuse or they'll quit because they were looking for a reason and this is the one they picked. They'll probably go off to some other game with worse balance ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 21:10:33
|
44. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I suspect he is including fleet boosts in that EHP calculation.
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 20:46:12
|
45. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Yeah, getting something nerfed sucks, but it's not generally what makes people quit a game. People swap games, quit and come back, and generally change their play patterns all the time. Games grow until the influx of n...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 17:52:07
|
46. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: How many people do you think do that, as opposed to how many people fly those ships because they are overpowered? You're going to have to get used to losing things in this game that you think are cool because others abuse th...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 17:08:25
|
47. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: THIs proves the point. A standard response by someone who doesn't want to see their unbalanced thing go away is "it's balanced by the fact that you can have one too, so you should just get one and leave mine alone". They alw...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 16:01:25
|
48. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: even when they should clearly be able to see how that advantage is unfair to other people". I find it cute how many people in Eve call for things to be pulled down to their level because they got killed a few times brin...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 15:34:03
|
49. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Rroff wrote: T3Cs have a huge following that goes beyond the one dimensional fact they are powerful or overpowered. No they don't. That's the point of the incursion story. They are telling themselves that what they are ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 15:25:04
|
50. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: You can't see it , but I'm laughing right now. That's because what you said was similar to something I heard incursion people say. Incursions used to be way more unbalanced than even they are now, so CCP announced a nerf wa...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 15:05:16
|
51. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: T3 cruisers are the "high sec lvl 5 missions" of spaceships in EVE. Meaning that CCP know about the bug that allowed people to force generate high sec lvl 5 missions for YEARS, and they knew that this was a bad/unbaslanced t...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 13:52:37
|
52. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mina Sebiestar wrote: C Close to BC/BS dmg One aspect here - I think it would be silly to make T3 variants of every class of ship - makes much more sense to have small, medium and large T3s that overlap the classes either side of them. If ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 11:20:30
|
53. Why is CCP spending so much time on rehashing content? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: If you feel like "the goal posts" keep moving then that's probably because you keep chasing the latest kinda OP flavor of the month ship or fit or whatever, rather than finding some over-arching goal within the game wor...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.17 11:08:35
|
54. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Rroff wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: Rroff wrote: You can pretty much bet there will be sizeable nerfs in the consolidation pass. Good. How the things remained as OP as they are for so long is beyond me. ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 21:56:43
|
55. Why is CCP spending so much time on rehashing content? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Do Little wrote: The average Eve player is now in their 30's with career and family responsibilities. Setting aside several hours for a fleet or cooperative industrial activity is difficult. As CCP Ghost pointed out at Fanfest - 90% of the peop...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 17:04:02
|
56. Why is CCP spending so much time on rehashing content? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranzabar wrote: When I'm in local, say in Balle. There are about 20 or so players in the system. Not a peep on local. I've dropped a line or two to sal hello and I get crickets. Same in other high-sec systems. That's Ok, I get it's a sandbox f...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 15:54:34
|
57. Why is CCP spending so much time on rehashing content? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ranzabar wrote: All you have to do is refer to the release of Incarna in 2011 to realize how quickly what seems to be innovation can bring the walls crashing down. Captains Quarters was to be the lead-in to WIS. I think lessons were learned. ...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 15:14:53
|
58. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Keno Skir wrote: I bolded and underlined the relevant part for you there. Also, as i mentioned my Prot is 700Mil all included so it's not mega blingy though yes it has faction magstabs. Sorry for triggering the BS defence in you there, but w...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 15:04:45
|
59. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: I've been told they do equal damage compared to battleships. That needs to go too. For the most part only if you compare a fully blinged T3 against a T2 fit battleship - even then the battleships have higher range...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 14:34:13
|
60. Why is CCP spending so much time on rehashing content? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sir BloodArgon Aulmais wrote: Eve has been dying for 10 years. What makes you so qualified to predict its end? Not really true though through to 2011 there was an upwards trend in just about every metric - through to 2014 it was mostly stab...
- by Rroff - at 2017.04.16 14:17:42
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |