| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 71 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Fistme
   |
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:12:00 -
[841]
Another solution could be to introduce fall off scripts to tracking comps. Mega or hype could choose to drop a portion of it's tackle (soloability) in favor of longer falloff allowing it to be more effective in gang warfare.
|
Koloch
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:25:00 -
[842]
 Originally by: The Djego
Originally by: Koloch
Originally by: The Djego
B: When did you used a Blaster ship the last time and stated I won because I have flown a Blaster Ship?
A: Nobody flyes Blaster ships this days, so how knows? I heard they are good Gang Damagedealers.
Man I'm getting tired of people saying this. I spend a lot of spare time looking at other corporation's killboards. Players still use blasterships and if anything there are usually in higher use. This over exageration is really getting tiresome.
It is more like a joke about so many people that donŠt actualy fly Blaster Ships tell you they are superior gang Damage dealers or superior solo Ships.
Heimatar(the area where I normaly stick around) was actualy quite Blaster heavy, many people flown them. You see many of this guyes now in other ships. You see Blaster Ships mostly in small Gangs now, not because they are extrem good there, but because it at least negates the tracking/range Problems, while having more tackle avaidalbe.
How about you tell us how successfull you are with your Blasterships since QR, o wait just another Alt in a Blaster Thread nvm. 
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
|
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:38:00 -
[843]
Edited by: Electric Universe on 18/03/2009 22:44:20
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
Exactly, this is one of the things i have been saying many times here to.
Blaster Megathrons are quite popular now, no matter what the cyrbabies here says.
And when they are used quite alot, i don't think Blasters have any problems or any problems that makes the ship with Blaster any poorer than an Abaddon.
And Mags, do you think i'm more NightmareX only because one whiner like you says so ?.
When you can't explan all of the things i have been saying here in this topic, then it's not hard to understand why you just want to ignore me. Maybe you can just start to explain things instead of just ignoring the facts?.
And yeh, do you really know why peoples like me argue so much with you about this?, simply because you don't understand how Blasters work. It's not hard to see it the last 6-7 pages .
When you can give some good and nice explanations on how small / med scale PVP works and how both a Megathron with Blaster and an Abaddon with Pulses works, then i'm gonna accept you more.
But before that happens, whine all you want.
|
The Djego
Minmatar
merovinger inc
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:38:00 -
[844]
Originally by: Fistme
Another solution could be to introduce fall off scripts to tracking comps. Mega or hype could choose to drop a portion of it's tackle (soloability) in favor of longer falloff allowing it to be more effective in gang warfare.
Thats would be actual quite nice for Minmatar and Aks. But fixing Falloff(or better Damage scaling in Falloff) at itself would be the fare better solution in the end.
The Megas and Hyperions gang role stand and fall on how serius you outdamage other ships at optimal range(and it scales preaty badly for a reason). It is actualy not about making Blaster ships better gang ships, this role is allready given to Amarr/Caldari and im fine with it.
The penalty is short range, what is ok as long as it results in advantages once you force the other ship to your range. A Blaster ship should not be superior in gangs(beside very very small ones) to a Amarr or Caldari ship(what is the case atm), diffrent to now it should outdo this ships solo and in this very very small gangs by a amount that compensates for lower EHP, range disadvantages and nuking your Cap with Neuts, MWD, Turrets or even a active tank.
----
Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus
Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
The Djego
Minmatar
merovinger inc
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:40:00 -
[845]
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
So no own experience with Blasterships, no own kills, just trolling Blaster Threads?
----
Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus
Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Childstar
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 22:47:00 -
[846]
Edited by: Childstar on 18/03/2009 22:55:33
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
While i think the comment was either poorly chosen or poorly phrased it does not change the fact that the reason that those blaster Battle ships are being flown is because the pilots using them cannot fly anything else.....yet.
And it is also undenyable that blaster BS have not moved with the times and been left in limbo as far as effectivness is concerned for the only real pvp available for BS now...gang combat. And as such blaster BS are being flown less as more people migrate to other classes of ships or even train other races.
|
Koloch
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:13:00 -
[847]
Originally by: The Djego
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
So no own experience with Blasterships, no own kills, just trolling Blaster Threads?
Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm trolling.
First find the meaning of troll, then look up debate.
|
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:15:00 -
[848]
Edited by: Electric Universe on 18/03/2009 23:16:16
Originally by: Childstar
Edited by: Childstar on 18/03/2009 22:55:33
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
While i think the comment was either poorly chosen or poorly phrased it does not change the fact that the reason that those blaster Battle ships are being flown is because the pilots using them cannot fly anything else.....yet.
And it is also undenyable that blaster BS have not moved with the times and been left in limbo as far as effectivness is concerned for the only real pvp available for BS now...gang combat. And as such blaster BS are being flown less as more people migrate to other classes of ships or even train other races.
To you first thing. That's a lie.
To you 2nd thing. You talk about guns that haven't moved with the times and have been left in limbo. I think we should look at Autocannons here then.
|
Koloch
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:24:00 -
[849]
Originally by: Childstar
Edited by: Childstar on 18/03/2009 22:55:33
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
While i think the comment was either poorly chosen or poorly phrased it does not change the fact that the reason that those blaster Battle ships are being flown is because the pilots using them cannot fly anything else.....yet.
Maybe in some cases, but how can you say *ALL of them can't fly anything else? I think that's a pretty big assumption.
Why don't they fly something below Battleship level. We can certainly assume that if they have the skills to fly a Battleship they can fly a cruiser and more than likely for that matter the t2 variations. Many blaster pilots in this thread have stated blasters below BS are well balanced. Why don't these blaster pilots then fly these ships that apparently perform a lot better instead of bs blasters?
|
Childstar
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:30:00 -
[850]
Originally by: Electric Universe
To you first thing. That's a lie.
Its not a lie as i know a hell of a lot of gallente pilots who are now either flying a differant class of ship in other kinds of pvp and only fly blaster BS in gangs reluctantly.
I also know that a lot of those pilots are cross training to fly amarr, but i know nobody who flies amarr that is cross training to fly gallente or any other race for that matter apart from maybe a falcon.
Originally by: Electric Universe
To you 2nd thing. You talk about guns that haven't moved with the times and have been left in limbo. I think we should look at Autocannons here then.
Thats easy, you just stop trolling this thread and select "new topic" from the ships and modules page.
|
|
|
The Djego
Minmatar
merovinger inc
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:34:00 -
[851]
Edited by: The Djego on 18/03/2009 23:34:46
Originally by: Koloch
Originally by: The Djego
Originally by: Koloch
Nope I'm not going to fall for that troll. No matter how you spin it your comment that no one is flying blaster ships is bull****. I don't need to post my killmails and beat my chest. Look at any solid pvp corporations killboards and you will see a lot of blaster boats being used. You will see a lot of gallente ships period.
So no own experience with Blasterships, no own kills, just trolling Blaster Threads?
Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm trolling.
First find the meaning of troll, then look up debate.
1. Adding nothing to the discussion.
2. Disagreeing other people without beeing able to correcting them.
4. Relaying fully on other people things because you are unable of bringing own points.
5. Posting with a Alt.
ItŠt not the fact of disagreeing, it is the fact you lacking any own points, lacking any proveable background what makes your opinion considerable and still you try other people to respond on your post specific by asking qestions, or more like tasks to disaprove/searching for facts that disaprove something that isnŠt actualy a fact.
That isnŠt a discussion that is trolling. I realy lack any kind of idea why people constantly have to troll ballancing threads, I mean we got C&P or COAD for a reason, didnŠt we?
----
Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus
Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Childstar
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:35:00 -
[852]
Originally by: Koloch
Maybe in some cases, but how can you say *ALL of them can't fly anything else? I think that's a pretty big assumption.
Why don't they fly something below Battleship level. We can certainly assume that if they have the skills to fly a Battleship they can fly a cruiser and more than likely for that matter the t2 variations. Many blaster pilots in this thread have stated blasters below BS are well balanced. Why don't these blaster pilots then fly these ships that apparently perform a lot better instead of bs blasters?
Some do, i know i flew the ishtar amoung other ships while i was finishing my amarr training, but the smaller classes of gallente ships are not any use in BS gangs.
|
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:41:00 -
[853]
Edited by: Electric Universe on 18/03/2009 23:44:17
Originally by: Childstar
Originally by: Electric Universe
To you first thing. That's a lie.
Its not a lie as i know a hell of a lot of gallente pilots who are now either flying a differant class of ship in other kinds of pvp and only fly blaster BS in gangs reluctantly.
I also know that a lot of those pilots are cross training to fly amarr, but i know nobody who flies amarr that is cross training to fly gallente or any other race for that matter apart from maybe a falcon.
Originally by: Electric Universe
To you 2nd thing. You talk about guns that haven't moved with the times and have been left in limbo. I think we should look at Autocannons here then.
Thats easy, you just stop trolling this thread and select "new topic" from the ships and modules page.
Do you know why they are training other races?, maybe because they need something new to train when they have maxed the skills on one race.
And no, i don't need to make a new topic only because i sad that Autocannons is in a need of a boost way way way before Blasters.
This topic is about every races and every ships. The OP asked for recommendation on other ships or races to fly.
And yeah, just because of the epic whines here. I will never train for anything that have with Amarr to do. I don't want ANYTHING to do with something that have with FOTM to do. Even if i had maxed the 3 other races up to Marauders.
After that, i will start on Carriers, Dreads and maybe Motherships to for the 3 races i have been training.
|
Childstar
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:52:00 -
[854]
Originally by: Electric Universe
Do you know why they are training other races?, maybe because they need something new to train when they have maxed the skills on one race.
Some have high SP and maybe a very few have completed training gallente but a lot more do not have maxed skills and are switching as training gallente BS is just not worth it.
Originally by: Electric Universe
I will never train for anything that have with Amarr to do. I don't want ANYTHING to do with something that have with FOTM to do. Even when i have maxed the 3 other races up to Marauders.
If you had any idea about any of the marauders you would not bother training for them.
|
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 23:57:00 -
[855]
Originally by: Childstar
Originally by: Electric Universe
Do you know why they are training other races?, maybe because they need something new to train when they have maxed the skills on one race.
Some have high SP and maybe a very few have completed training gallente but a lot more do not have maxed skills and are switching as training gallente BS is just not worth it.
Originally by: Electric Universe
I will never train for anything that have with Amarr to do. I don't want ANYTHING to do with something that have with FOTM to do. Even when i have maxed the 3 other races up to Marauders.
If you had any idea about any of the marauders you would not bother training for them.
I train whatever i might find usefull now or later.
|
Koloch
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 00:00:00 -
[856]
Originally by: Koloch
Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm trolling.
First find the meaning of troll, then look up debate.
Originally by: The Djego
1. Adding nothing to the discussion.
2. Disagreeing other people without beeing able to correcting them.
4. Relaying fully on other people things because you are unable of bringing own points.
5. Posting with a Alt.
ItŠt not the fact of disagreeing, it is the fact you lacking any own points, lacking any proveable background what makes your opinion considerable and still you try other people to respond on your post specific by asking qestions, or more like tasks to disaprove/searching for facts that disaprove something that isnŠt actualy a fact.
That isnŠt a discussion that is trolling. I realy lack any kind of idea why people constantly have to troll ballancing threads, I mean we got C&P or CAOD for a reason, didnŠt we?
Because you obviously don't know the meaning of troll;
Troll;
Act of appearing on internet forums and boards with malicious intent. Trolling includes...
-batting people to flame at you
-putting the forum down and encouraging people to leave.
-flaming
-spamming
-using several identities on a board to support your own arguments / stage pretend arguments
I have done none of this. If you make a statement that isn't correct I have every right to correct it. That isn't trolling. I am also allowed to post my opinion from the other side. a)I have fought blaster ships b) I fly with people that fly blaster ships and c) I actually do fly blaster ships.
What's up with this elitist attitude that only people that fly blaster boats are allowed to post in blaster balancing threads - what an utter load of crap. If I'm proven wrong on a statement I'II admit it, but telling me I'm not allowed to post in this thread or that I have no experience to post is bull.
Actually if we step back your reply to my valid post is more of a troll than mine.
|
The Djego
Minmatar
merovinger inc
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 01:00:00 -
[857]
Edited by: The Djego on 19/03/2009 01:02:07
Originally by: Koloch
Because you obviously don't know the meaning of troll;
Troll;
Act of appearing on internet forums and boards with malicious intent. Trolling includes...
-batting people to flame at you
-putting the forum down and encouraging people to leave.
-flaming
-spamming
-using several identities on a board to support your own arguments / stage pretend arguments
I have done none of this. If you make a statement that isn't correct I have every right to correct it. That isn't trolling. I am also allowed to post my opinion from the other side. a)I have fought blaster ships b) I fly with people that fly blaster ships and c) I actually do fly blaster ships.
There are zero comment that proves A, B or C in this thread, I might actualy not care about how your main is, because it dosnŠt matter. If people have some point they post them instead of diskussing why the post with alts about points that arnŠt there own.
Originally by: Koloch
What's up with this elitist attitude that only people that fly blaster boats are allowed to post in blaster balancing threads - what an utter load of crap. If I'm proven wrong on a statement I'II admit it, but telling me I'm not allowed to post in this thread or that I have no experience to post is bull.
Fly a Blaster Ship and you know. 
Since Blaster ships are this ****ing common on general PVP atm everybody must be on the dooing or reciving end, or do you admit you are wrong and the Blaster ship is actualy a vents toy that is heaviely outdated and actualy not very common in todays PVP? 
Originally by: Koloch
Actually if we step back your reply to my valid post is more of a troll than mine.
Meta-discussion anyone?
Originally by: Koloch
If someone makes a statement that I think is a bit bogus and I ask a question. Answering it back with "**** off alt" is trolling. There are some here that actually answer back...and in some cases with some valid arguments. Which is awesome. It's all about having a discussion.
I still stand your point that nobody flies blaster boats anymore is a giant stretch.
Getting flamed for altposting -> post with your main(at least a solution for anybody that isnŠt trolling).
The simple reason 95% of the people posting here point on EFT numbers/repeeting statements of other people instead of real ingame PVP engagements should show anybody a preaty clear picture how many people here actualy fly the Ships atm and how many posting here without flying them.
I personaly couldnŠt care less about you and all the other people spaming this treads. What I realy care are discussions about Blaster ships and how EFT data and fancy graphs donŠt meet ingame experience(like this one 1 page ago with Marn about how and why some numbers donŠt work out on TQ this well) or discussions with other Blaster Vents that could look me straight in the eye and say Blasters are ok.
----
Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus
Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Koloch
Amarr
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 01:24:00 -
[858]
Originally by: The Djego
stuff...
well if you care so much about not trolling then how about we get back to the discussion that you derailed.
...and lets try to keep to reality. If you're going to make a bold statement that nobody flies blaster boats anymore lets see the proof. As I stated it takes 10 minutes to find a killboard and step through the most recent kills/losses. Like my previous statement this data proves you wrong. Now maybe it's for other reasons, but the fact remains people still use them.
|
Goumindong
Amarr
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 02:56:00 -
[859]
Originally by: Hepren D'narr
I find that sentence quite funny. Even Bellum Eternus thinks blasters require big boost at their DPS.
I find this sentence to be quite funny. Bellum Eternus has been arguing for blaster buffs for as long as he has been playing the game. He has never not supported buffing blasters. He is the quintessential self interested whiner.
|
Valadeya uthanaras
Corp 1 Allstars
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 03:04:00 -
[860]
Originally by: Hepren D'narr
Hey, you could atleast try to explain us WHY it would make eve pvp so unbalanced you make it sound. It's not like everybody surprisingly and immediality would start to use Gallente BS's in gangs, instead of, say, Amarr ones? They would still lack the range, like they should, but atleast some of those changes Valadeya suggested, would make them more the way they are supposed to be.
Still, personally I suggest big boost for DPS. Keep the range and tracking as same, but blasters are lacking DPS right now.
Thanks for the positive comment 
but comming back on what I said , I didnt ask for all of them to be put at the same time , but I am more asking for them to be tested then evaluated , because each of them , I my opinion , goes toward the blaster style of combat.
I Didnt forget that , in most ship class , gallente also have a huge drone bay to back these blaster up and any "massive boost" to them would indeed make them quite umbalance, but atm they are defenatly not good enought
Val
|
|
|
JadeMako
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 09:48:00 -
[861]
Originally by: Goumindong
He is the quintessential self interested whiner.
WARNING!! Irony overload!!! |
maralt
Minmatar
The seers of truth
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 10:22:00 -
[862]
Originally by: JadeMako
Originally by: Goumindong
He is the quintessential self interested whiner.
WARNING!! Irony overload!!!
/Signed
The forums really should have some sort of filter against such high levels..
|
Childstar
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 12:02:00 -
[863]
Edited by: Childstar on 19/03/2009 12:30:04
Originally by: Valadeya uthanaras
I my opinion , goes toward the blaster style of combat.
Considering they are the ships that need to spend all their time either getting well inside and or being well inside point and web range to even get close to their optimal ranges, blaster BS are severely lacking in one way or another as far as speed, dmg/range ratio and tank is concerned.
Here is how i see how it was and now is..
(Insert swirly memory thingy)
Before the web and other changes battle ships had their short comings somewhat mitigated by the fact that they could web ships of the same class easily enough but also stand a chance against smaller ships to such a extent that they could hit and drive them off or maybe even kill them if the BS pilots flew/used their ships correctly and well.
Now this applied to most BS and especially blaster BS as their optimal operational range is well inside web range and as such they relied on making ships like BC and other BS stay in their tiny optimal, and even smaller ships inside that range slow enough to hit now and again and even standing a small chance of holding those long enough to kill them.
Blaster BS were still considered poor by comparision to lasers ect in gang combat due to a distinct lack of range amoung other things but at the very least a role could be found for them as reasonably effective solo and 2-3 ship gangs as they had a adequatly sized target selection and a reasonable chance to tackle those targets long enough to kill them if they flew well and worked as a team.
Then eve changed.
(more swirly stuffs)
Now this is not a assignment of blame or a point of a finger just a statment of the facts.
Eve changed and it was decided that each class/size of ship/system should only be fully effective against a simular class/size and less effective but have the possability of hitting the class/size immediatly below. Many ways were discussed on how to achieve this goal including tracking reduction to drones and gunnery systems along with a reduction in the effect of webs and a adjustment to ship speed and inertia/accelleration all to coincide with the removal of nano.
Eventually the idea and the adjustments it needed to work were implemented and the next era in eve combat was born as ppl tested various setups and adjusted their ship choices, styles and fittings to suit the new mechanics.
Now for battleships that were already highly effective in gang combat like laser BS the game changed for the better because with the removal of nano (that came along just after they recieved a rather nice tracking increase) close range gang combat in BS was on the rise as a regular and very available form of pvp and they were head and shoulders above the other races at it.
For blaster BS however it was a differant story as they were still as poor at gang combat as before due to lacking range, needing to mwd a lot to do any real damage against multiple targets and having poor EHP considering they work almost exclusivly within the web, point and optimal range of any hostile gang they face.
The web reduction along with other things reduced their available solo target selection to a tiny fraction, consisting of ships that are slower after module/effects on both sides are taken into account, so pretty much only slower BS or those without webs or mwd's. Also in the small 2-3 man teams they also lost the ability to stand a chance of defending themselves against a squad of small ships even slightly effectivly.
When all things considered like how the game is today, how the availability and ability of combat for battleships in general was deliberatly changed/reduced and how much those changes have effected blaster BS i do not think that modernizing blaster BS (and other BS/systems that may need it) so they are a bit more effective in the only type of combat that is now available for them is wrong.
|
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 13:17:00 -
[864]
Edited by: Electric Universe on 19/03/2009 13:20:12
Child, even if you gave a somewhat of an explanation, it still doesn't make your reasons that a Blaster BS any poorer than any other BS'es in a gang combat.
You forget soooooo many things that have to do with gang combat.
You forget the resists to EM and Thermal for example, you forget the one RR a Mega can have, to rep each others, that actually can make up for the extra EHP the Abaddon have. You forgot to tell how much more agile a Mega is than any of the Amarr BS'es is. You also forgot that MWDing 25-30 km in a Mega doesn't take many seconds. You forget that the web nerf was hitting every ships that use a webber.
You forgot that Laser BS'es use waaaaaaaaaaaay more cap than a Blaster Mega does. You also forget to say that when a Mega is in your web range, or around 3-5 km and orbiting you, you will have hard time to hit him any good, because of the tracking on Lasers (not that this have so much with gang combat to do, but still, if that happens then.....). And you also forgot to take the advantages each weapons have over the other weapons etc etc.
You just looks at the EFT stats and says wow, the Abaddon have some better stats than the Mega, so the Mega must sucks.
When you realize that those points over as i have said now, is some VERY valid points in gang combats, then we can start to accept each others more.
But before that happens. I'm not gonna get bitten by the players who only looks at the EFT stats and goes crazy over it.
|
Cohkka
Celestial Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 13:48:00 -
[865]
I don't know how many Blasterships are flown these days as there aren't any numbers to prove it. All I know is that for any resonable sized gang (6-8 BS and up) a Railfitted Mega does the job way better than a Blaster one. Now considering Rails do 30% less damage than Scorch MPs with less range and tracking you can set things in perspective.
Oh, but I know, it's all up to playstyle and... It certainly is, if you're flying along ganksquads that don't intend engaging larger/even numbers (and there are many that will inflate the number of Blasterships flown... and they end up on the killboard of the enemy most of the time) or that hardcore diehard PvPer with gangs that don't exceed the number of 3, or suicide gangs for that matter. Nice niche role...
Don't speak english, just F5, F5, F5... |
Zubakis
Bambooule
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 13:56:00 -
[866]
Originally by: Electric Universe
You also forgot that MWDing 25-30 km in a Mega doesn't take many seconds.
R u sure? Try it out how long does it take to move 30km from a full stop. It will be like 30sec.
-- Zuba |
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 14:02:00 -
[867]
Originally by: Zubakis
Originally by: Electric Universe
You also forgot that MWDing 25-30 km in a Mega doesn't take many seconds.
R u sure? Try it out how long does it take to move 30km from a full stop. It will be like 30sec.
Yeah, and 30 secs is long time?.
|
Cohkka
Celestial Apocalypse
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 14:02:00 -
[868]
Originally by: Electric Universe
Those things over, like with the RR you can use on the Megathron and because they have such good DPS at 5 km range is just 2 examples on why a Blaster Megathron is so popular in gang combats today.
Prove or STFU. Your own ally mate invited you to join their gangs from time to time, why is it they don't fly Blasterships?
And as for RR on a Blastermega... lol, you're certainly THE instance to talk to when it comes to gang combat dynamics.
Don't speak english, just F5, F5, F5... |
Zubakis
Bambooule
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 14:04:00 -
[869]
Originally by: Electric Universe
Originally by: Zubakis
Originally by: Electric Universe
You also forgot that MWDing 25-30 km in a Mega doesn't take many seconds.
R u sure? Try it out how long does it take to move 30km from a full stop. It will be like 30sec.
Yeah, and 30 secs is long time?.
If it's not long, then u probably dont have a clue what are you talking about.
-- Zuba |
Electric Universe
Minmatar
The Choir
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 14:05:00 -
[870]
Originally by: Cohkka
Originally by: Electric Universe
Those things over, like with the RR you can use on the Megathron and because they have such good DPS at 5 km range is just 2 examples on why a Blaster Megathron is so popular in gang combats today.
Prove or STFU. Your own ally mate invited you to join their gangs from time to time, why is it they don't fly Blasterships?
And as for RR on a Blastermega... lol, you're certainly THE instance to talk to when it comes to gang combat dynamics.
My own ally mate?, i'm not even in an alliance dude.
I have nothing to do with that alliance in any ways.
And after i did take a look at their killboard, it's no suprise that they don't use a Blaster Mega much. It's because of their play style. What i did see was that they use frigs, HAC's Racon's and sniper ships alot.
You know, not every alliances have the same play style, right?.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 71 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |