EVE Search - Yih's Anti-Goon Business Plan

I know it's hard to bother and read what people posts, so let me rehash it for you:

He asked auditors for one, simple, single thing: that we confirm that he's a GS director.

Edit: unless he also sends an API key he could also be just someone who somehow controls a GS director to send mails.

Nothing more, nothing less, no support nor anything.

Where's the support in saying:

"I have been contacted by Yih in order to be sent his main's name and thus to confirm he's at least a director in the organization called "GoonFleet"."

or

"Once people know he's "real" (assuming he'll succesfully do that) then they can make an *informed* decision, knowing well about the kind of risks involved"

Firstly, please remove the big letters, it makes the thread unreadable.

Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha
The MD audits are financial audits.

Who said MD Audits are finantial audits only? I think searching for scammers is one of the most relevant parts on an MD Audit, I see no finantial check there. Audit was the word used, without prefixes. From the Wikipedia definition:

Originally by: Wikipedia
The general definition of an audit is an evaluation of a person, organization, system, process, enterprise, project or product. Audits are performed to ascertain the validity and reliability of information; also to provide an assessment of a system's internal control.

[...]In the case of financial audits, a set of financial statements are said to be true and fair when they are free of material misstatements - a concept influenced by both quantitative and qualitative factors.

Audits here are more than 'a set of financial statements'. Just in case any doubt remained.

Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha
If you can bother go back and re-read the threads, it was not encouragement (I even state that) but just debunking a bunch of gratuitous flames.
I don't consider "arguments against investing" statements like "this guy looks legit lol".

I was refering to this post and followings. It is possible that you did not 'encourage' investing on purpose, but you go farther than exposing obvious flames and your statements were pro-investment even if you didn't made it with that purpose. Tell me where's the flame in here:

Quote:
murkiness I referred to was more of a reference to the political distinction between this proposition and other offerings. In most MD offerings the only end goal is profit which is, relatively, easy to predict

Althought you state a thousand times that you are not endorsing, nor encouraging investment, that means nothing if you actually do it. You even recognise that you were talking favourably when you said "ATM I have no interest at embellishing his face". That implied you were doing so and justifying yourself at doing it without vested interests.

I am not saying that you gave those favourable comments with a second intention and it is possible that you were just impressed by the plan or the talk with him, but the thing I'm trying to say is that you gave those favourable comments.

You said that the only thing that matters is the "financial offer", comparable to any other business when other concerns are raised and saying that "he's not just after money" when financial concerns are raised.