Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 34 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
97
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 03:03:00 -
[901] - Quote
While I am not a member of the illustrious Faction Five, I can attest that he's not even trying to scam, lie or deceive you in any way. The math doesn't lie, and outgaming CCP is way more hilarious than trolling some blokes on Eve-o. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 03:55:00 -
[902] - Quote
While I understand that Cobalt is, and will for the foreseeable future sell at less than cost, you have to assume the people running the moon want some profit from it. Add to that the cost of the fuel blocks and you have a nice wide margin for tech moon owners to make, because for every isk the Cobalt moon miners want, the tech moon miners make 10x that amount.
Remember, reaction towers are not safe nor are they easy to maintain, so the profits won't be driven to zero by the idiots who think the minerals they mine are free. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
98
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 04:00:00 -
[903] - Quote
Sigras wrote:
Remember, reaction towers are not safe nor are they easy to maintain, so the profits won't be driven to zero by the idiots who think the minerals they mine are free.
While normally I agree, the five smartest men in EVE agree that for technetium alchemy, it is essentially free. Look for the spreadsheet last page for a complete calculation of costs. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 05:40:00 -
[904] - Quote
ok, ive looked over the numbers in the spreadsheet, and it appears theyre manipulating the numbers for a worst case scenario.
#1 theyre assuming a 15 fuel block per hour price cost for the tower - this means a medium tower in 0.0 space with sov. This is perfectly understandable, but what theyre saying is that there are so many cobalt moons in 0.0 that they can and will hold down the market. This i seriously doubt, simply because any sov holding alliance large enough to control a significant portion of moons isnt going to screw with it without a significant profit which brings me to my second point
#2 theyre assuming 100 million a month profit - again i suppose this is understandable, but when I was in the north, i saw moons that could make 300 million a month go towerless because "its not worth our time in logistics" Even my alliance wont even look at me if i dont come up with a setup that makes at least 500 million a month. You also have to remember, whatever the alchemy producers are making, each tech moon makes 10x that much in clear profit.
TL;DR I understand that alchemy could push the Tech price to essentially cost, but that would require a lot of people doing a lot of work for almost no return, just like mining could push the mineral price to zero, but who would do all that work for nothing? |

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
305
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 05:55:00 -
[905] - Quote
Sigras wrote: TL;DR I understand that alchemy could push the Tech price to essentially cost, but that would require a lot of people doing a lot of work for almost no return, just like mining could push the mineral price to zero, but who would do all that work for nothing?
The fact cobalt is currently mined below cost, as are many other low end moon minerals, as a way to recoup fuel costs on a tower used for other purposes?
Edit: I can't explain this from a behavioral standpoint, I simply point to the fact it's being done right now as proof. |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
272
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 05:56:00 -
[906] - Quote
Sigras wrote: #2 theyre assuming 100 million a month profit - again i suppose this is understandable, but when I was in the north, i saw moons that could make 300 million a month go towerless because "its not worth our time in logistics" ?
This is because you can hit the alchemy limit with just mining systems with 4+ cobalt moons and a station. Nobody will tower the lone cobalt moon in Venal. This circles back to the "you can only alchemize so many moons" point. |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
272
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:03:00 -
[907] - Quote
Sigras wrote: #1 theyre assuming a 15 fuel block per hour price cost for the tower - this means a medium tower in 0.0 space with sov. This is perfectly understandable, but what theyre saying is that there are so many cobalt moons in 0.0 that they can and will hold down the market. This i seriously doubt, simply because any sov holding alliance large enough to control a significant portion of moons isnt going to screw with it without a significant profit which brings me to my second point
Moons worth only 100m (or 200m, or 300m) per month are never run on an alliance level, they're delegated to members to run if they want. But there will be plenty of people in alliances in cobalt space willing to run these. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:07:00 -
[908] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Sigras wrote: TL;DR I understand that alchemy could push the Tech price to essentially cost, but that would require a lot of people doing a lot of work for almost no return, just like mining could push the mineral price to zero, but who would do all that work for nothing?
The fact cobalt is currently mined below cost, as are many other low end moon minerals, as a way to recoup fuel costs on a tower used for other purposes? Edit: I can't explain this from a behavioral standpoint, I simply point to the fact it's being done right now as proof.
true, but to extend this claim to our current conversation and continue using the numbers we put forth earlier, you'd have to also agree that these people are selling the cobalt from 0.0 to get the fuel discount that was mentioned, and that these people wouldnt mind losing another 2000 CPU from their tower for the reactor and the extra silo needed for this chain. Both of these I would doubt
|

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
272
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:08:00 -
[909] - Quote
Sigras wrote: true, but to extend this claim to our current conversation and continue using the numbers we put forth earlier, you'd have to also agree that these people are selling the cobalt from 0.0 to get the fuel discount that was mentioned, and that these people wouldnt mind losing another 2000 CPU from their tower for the reactor and the extra silo needed for this chain. Both of these I would doubt
mining cobalt instead of buying it adds zero CPU to a tower and requires one less silo (the one the harvester replaces) |

Heathkit
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
84
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:20:00 -
[910] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote: When making an alchemy pos, it is better in every single situation to mine the cobalt instead of buying and importing it. As you may know, the fitting requirements for a silo and a moon miner are exactly the same. This means that any reaction that uses base minerals fits on a pos and uses the same fuel regardless of if one, both, or none of its components are mined on that moon. In other words, you incur absolutely no extra costs to mine a mineral rather than import it (while saving the cost of purchasing it and importing it).
Doesn't this seem broken to people? I don't understand why moon harvesters and silos should have the same fitting requirements. Maybe it's late in the game to make such a drastic change, though. |
|

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
581
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:31:00 -
[911] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:While I am not a member of the illustrious Faction Five, I can attest that he's not even trying to scam, lie or deceive you in any way. The math doesn't lie, and outgaming CCP is way more hilarious than trolling some blokes on Eve-o.
Then why even bring this up? Just let it go live and enjoy the good old out gaming of CCP? I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:43:00 -
[912] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Sigras wrote: true, but to extend this claim to our current conversation and continue using the numbers we put forth earlier, you'd have to also agree that these people are selling the cobalt from 0.0 to get the fuel discount that was mentioned, and that these people wouldnt mind losing another 2000 CPU from their tower for the reactor and the extra silo needed for this chain. Both of these I would doubt
mining cobalt instead of buying it adds zero CPU to a tower and requires one less silo (the one the harvester replaces) I was responding to the claim that cobalt is currently sold under cost. He was saying (I think) what if the people currently selling cobalt under cost simply change to selling PT under cost. My response to that is it costs 2000 more CPU to turn cobalt and platinum into PT and that the idiots selling cobalt under price are not (mainly) in 0.0 and are therefore not getting the fuel bonus which we discussed earlier. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 06:52:00 -
[913] - Quote
Heathkit wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote: When making an alchemy pos, it is better in every single situation to mine the cobalt instead of buying and importing it. As you may know, the fitting requirements for a silo and a moon miner are exactly the same. This means that any reaction that uses base minerals fits on a pos and uses the same fuel regardless of if one, both, or none of its components are mined on that moon. In other words, you incur absolutely no extra costs to mine a mineral rather than import it (while saving the cost of purchasing it and importing it).
Doesn't this seem broken to people? I don't understand why moon harvesters and silos should have the same fitting requirements. Maybe it's late in the game to make such a drastic change, though. Theyre not exactly the same, silos cost 40,000 more PG than moon miners but reaction towers are always restricted by CPU not PG so theyre the same in all the ways that matter.
That being said, did you think the moon miners should be more expensive CPU wise or less?
Right now theyre very specifically balanced so that you can both mine and react a 3 input complex reaction (Phenolic Composites, Nanotransistors, and Hypersynaptic Fibers) on three towers if you have the materials. This takes 100% of the CPU 7500/7500 of a large caldari tower, if you increased the cost of moon miners from 500 to 501 CPU it would not be possible to mine and react at the same time the 3 input reactions.
Im not saying this is necessarily a bad thing im just saying those are the ramifications of changing the CPU cost of silos/ moon harvesters. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
555
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 12:15:00 -
[914] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Wocka Wocka!
Remember that if you like this change you should hit the "like" button on this post. I need to know if this is the kind of work the community is looking for. ;)
:Update 24/7:
After evaluating the market reactions and the estimates from experienced players we now feel comfortable accelerating our planned implementation these reactions. We're going to have them start at 10/1 ratios and re-evaluate from there.
New versions of the reactions are:
- 100 Titanium + 100 Vanadium -> 1 Unrefined Vanadium Hafnite -> 20 Vanadium Hafnite +-á 90 Vanadium - 100 Cobalt + 100 Platinum -> 1 Unrefined Platinum Technite -> 20 Platinum Technite + 90 Platinum - 100 Scandium + 100 Chromium -> 1 Unrefined Solerium -> 20 Solerium + 90 Chromium - 100 Scandium + 100 Cadmium -> 1 Unrefined Caesarium Cadmide -> 20 Caesarium Cadmide + 90 Cadmium
- 100 Evaporite Deposits + 100 Atmospheric Gases -> 1 Unrefined Hexite -> 20 Hexite
- 100 Atmospheric Gases + 100 Tungsten -> 1 Unrefined Rolled Tungsten Alloy -> 20 Rolled Tungsten Alloy + 90 Tungsten-á - 100 Evaporite Deposits + 100 Titanium -> 1 Unrefined Titanium Chromide -> 20 Titanium Chromide + 90 Titanium - 100 Hydrocarbons + 100 Scandium -> 1 Unrefined Fernite Alloy-> 20 Fernite Alloy + 90 Scandium - 100 Silicates + 100 Cobalt -> 1 Unrefined Crystallite Alloy -> 20 Crystallite Alloy + 90 Cobalt
That's good waka waka stuff ! brb |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
632
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:09:00 -
[915] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:While I am not a member of the illustrious Faction Five, I can attest that he's not even trying to scam, lie or deceive you in any way. The math doesn't lie, and outgaming CCP is way more hilarious than trolling some blokes on Eve-o. Then why even bring this up? Just let it go live and enjoy the good old out gaming of CCP?
Saying "I knew that thing that just happened was going to happen" is only credible if you also say it before it happens. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1728
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 16:37:00 -
[916] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Hammer Legion Member wrote:sorry if thats off-topic, but doesnt give that kind of information CSM Members (and their friends, eventually) an advantage over other players in order of speculation etc? You need a TLA: NDA.
People don't even honor those agreements for much more serious RL matters, figures in a game. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1728
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 16:40:00 -
[917] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Nerf intelligence.
Oh, and it is true that T1 and T2 production are about to go full dumb for a few months. Dump anything that contains minerals, technetium or isotopes. It will all hilariously crash.
Finished selling my last Hulk 2 days ago, for close to 290M :D Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1728
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 16:47:00 -
[918] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:2. Exhumers are tied to the price of tech (over 50% of their value currently) 3. If exhumers are buffed with a huge cargohold and a 30k+ EHP, they can AFK ice all day with 10 accounts, thus ice drops to historic lows (300-600 isk/piece)
As someone who setup an Orca and macks when ice got up to above 1100 I can easily tell you that the amount of AFK ice mining done in there was already absolute and total.
After the hottest spike of Hulkageddon, the second part (the "perma" phase) has failed considerably so it's back to 100 people in local, ALL AFK mining in peace except me who I took statistics all the time.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1728
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 16:57:00 -
[919] - Quote
Sigras wrote:While I understand that Cobalt is, and will for the foreseeable future sell at less than cost, you have to assume the people running the moon want some profit from it. Add to that the cost of the fuel blocks and you have a nice wide margin for tech moon owners to make, because for every isk the Cobalt moon miners want, the tech moon miners make 10x that amount.
Remember, reaction towers are not safe nor are they easy to maintain, so the profits won't be driven to zero by the idiots who think the minerals they mine are free.
Are you willing to bet something important about that? Half Jita economy relies on idiots who think the minerals they mine are free, on all levels. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:28:00 -
[920] - Quote
really? ive been in Jita a long time, and Ive never found anything selling below cost (except for the stupid POS module/PI debacle but thats not due to market factors)
Its my opinion that the people who are running POSs are generally more intelligent than that. |
|

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
277
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:36:00 -
[921] - Quote
Sigras wrote:really? ive been in Jita a long time, and Ive never found anything selling below cost (except for the stupid POS module/PI debacle but thats not due to market factors)
Its my opinion that the people who are running POSs are generally more intelligent than that. I have explained, in detail, why the correct way to value cobalt being mined is zero. Why don't you point to the part you're having trouble with or disagree with and we'll go from there. |

Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
125
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:45:00 -
[922] - Quote
im not having trouble with that, my rebuttal was to the people who said that alchemy would be done with 0 profit. Im saying that nobody would do the alchemy on a tower for 0 profit, especially since that now means the tower cant be used for much else. which is not the case with just mining cobalt and dumping it into a silo.
My contention is that the idiots who sell their products assuming the minerals they mine are not free are not (for the most part) running POSs |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
277
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 17:53:00 -
[923] - Quote
Sigras wrote:im not having trouble with that, my rebuttal was to the people who said that alchemy would be done with 0 profit. Im saying that nobody would do the alchemy on a tower for 0 profit, especially since that now means the tower cant be used for much else. which is not the case with just mining cobalt and dumping it into a silo.
My contention is that the idiots who sell their products assuming the minerals they mine are not free are not (for the most part) running POSs Oh, you're correct that's wrong. Alchemy will definitely have profit unless there are just that many people who need a medium ratting tower they're just going to throw an alchemy lab on to cover costs. I can't imagine there are many of those people, though that's going to quickly become the standard way to throw up a ratting tower in cobalt regions. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
582
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 18:42:00 -
[924] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:rodyas wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:While I am not a member of the illustrious Faction Five, I can attest that he's not even trying to scam, lie or deceive you in any way. The math doesn't lie, and outgaming CCP is way more hilarious than trolling some blokes on Eve-o. Then why even bring this up? Just let it go live and enjoy the good old out gaming of CCP? Saying "I knew that thing that just happened was going to happen" is only credible if you also say it before it happens.
Well not really true in a way. The main problem I see with you guys not being able to do it after it goes live. Is that you depend on tech money foremost. Which this has a chance to majorly nerf. Lossing all that ISK, would be worse then out gaming CCP. So here you guys are trying to warn us. Even though most of us won't be affected. Only you and your alliance. As well as other big allaince, not alot of us are a part of.
I wish I had more to say, but you goons F'ed up the economy so much, its really hard to predict what will happen, tbh. Guess we shall just wait to see what CCP makes go live, then move on from that or so. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
101
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 19:46:00 -
[925] - Quote
rodyas wrote:
I wish I had more to say, but you goons F'ed up the economy so much, its really hard to predict what will happen, tbh. Guess we shall just wait to see what CCP makes go live, then move on from that or so.
We didn't screw the economy. Whatever we do simply can't be on the same scale as CCP's meddling (except that one time with faction warfare)
|

Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
306
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 01:57:00 -
[926] - Quote
Sigras wrote:im not having trouble with that, my rebuttal was to the people who said that alchemy would be done with 0 profit. Im saying that nobody would do the alchemy on a tower for 0 profit, especially since that now means the tower cant be used for much else. which is not the case with just mining cobalt and dumping it into a silo.
My contention is that the idiots who sell their products assuming the minerals they mine are not free are not (for the most part) running POSs
Again, the current margins on a lot of types of alchemy, and the presence of towers running these reactions in rented space and low sec suggests you're wrong. I've scanned plenty of towers that mine evaporites and nothing else. I can understand your personal view that the amount of effort that goes into maintaining a POS isn't worthwhile without a good return on effort invested, but other people would rather undercut, sell their stuff, and just be able to have fuel costs met for their safe sport and can of ammo/CHA/SMA/whatever. |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
582
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 03:42:00 -
[927] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:rodyas wrote:
I wish I had more to say, but you goons F'ed up the economy so much, its really hard to predict what will happen, tbh. Guess we shall just wait to see what CCP makes go live, then move on from that or so.
We didn't screw the economy. Whatever we do simply can't be on the same scale as CCP's meddling (except that one time with faction warfare)
I didn't say you ruined the game, Well besideds maybe that one time with faction warfare. I said you ruined the economy (or perhaps just part of it). The pos fuel price is real high and so is tech. Which the goons helped make sure of. Those are key parts in figuring out alchemy. The ratio is also part of it. But its hard to find a good ratio, with pos fuel and tech being played with.
The other goon here, evilweasel, was trying to warn us of the drastic change CCP would make to the game. But with you guys screwing up those price indexes, it almost guarantees, CCP will not be able to do a good job, or that the 10:1 ratio would stay. He also makes other points besides those ones. Those could happen, but are harder to see, we shall see what comes up. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
599
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:23:00 -
[928] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:rodyas wrote:
I wish I had more to say, but you goons F'ed up the economy so much, its really hard to predict what will happen, tbh. Guess we shall just wait to see what CCP makes go live, then move on from that or so.
We didn't screw the economy. Whatever we do simply can't be on the same scale as CCP's meddling (except that one time with faction warfare) I didn't say you ruined the game, Well besideds maybe that one time with faction warfare. I said you ruined the economy (or perhaps just part of it). The pos fuel price is real high and so is tech. Which the goons helped make sure of. Those are key parts in figuring out alchemy. The ratio is also part of it. But its hard to find a good ratio, with pos fuel and tech being played with. The other goon here, evilweasel, was trying to warn us of the drastic change CCP would make to the game. But with you guys screwing up those price indexes, it almost guarantees, CCP will not be able to do a good job, or that the 10:1 ratio would stay. He also makes other points besides those ones. Those could happen, but are harder to see, we shall see what comes up.
The overwhelming majority of credit for the current state of the economy goes to CCP, because they're the ones that removed the overwhelming majority of the supply of minerals. Hulkageddon didn't help but, had the drone regions remained intact, it would have been a blip as it had been in previous years...a bigger blip, perhaps, due to the bounties keeping people more involved, but a blip nonetheless. Burn Jita was really just a temporary blip in sales with no long term effect. Tech would be a price increase on the T2 front, to be sure, but that price increase is accentuated by the increase in minerals as well.
Really, its flattering that you give us so much credit, but our antics are accentuating effects, not primary drivers. This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
fofofo |

Killian McLoud
Space Clown Gang
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 21:20:00 -
[929] - Quote
GRIEV3R wrote:Oh man, OTEC is probably going to QQ pretty hard at this. But I'm pretty sure they've already extracted their trillions out of it already.
on a semi-related note, wouldn't it be spiffy if, in the real world, if we don't like OPEC having a monopoly on virtually all the oil on Earth, we could just "tweak" the laws of chemistry and physics so anyone can make a replacement for oil in their basement?
ah, if only reality had benevolent Devs.
you mean something like this http://journeytoforever.org/biodiesel_make.html |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
584
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 03:59:00 -
[930] - Quote
corestwo wrote:rodyas wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:rodyas wrote:
I wish I had more to say, but you goons F'ed up the economy so much, its really hard to predict what will happen, tbh. Guess we shall just wait to see what CCP makes go live, then move on from that or so.
We didn't screw the economy. Whatever we do simply can't be on the same scale as CCP's meddling (except that one time with faction warfare) I didn't say you ruined the game, Well besideds maybe that one time with faction warfare. I said you ruined the economy (or perhaps just part of it). The pos fuel price is real high and so is tech. Which the goons helped make sure of. Those are key parts in figuring out alchemy. The ratio is also part of it. But its hard to find a good ratio, with pos fuel and tech being played with. The other goon here, evilweasel, was trying to warn us of the drastic change CCP would make to the game. But with you guys screwing up those price indexes, it almost guarantees, CCP will not be able to do a good job, or that the 10:1 ratio would stay. He also makes other points besides those ones. Those could happen, but are harder to see, we shall see what comes up. The overwhelming majority of credit for the current state of the economy goes to CCP, because they're the ones that removed the overwhelming majority of the supply of minerals. Hulkageddon didn't help but, had the drone regions remained intact, it would have been a blip as it had been in previous years...a bigger blip, perhaps, due to the bounties keeping people more involved, but a blip nonetheless. Burn Jita was really just a temporary blip in sales with no long term effect. Tech would be a price increase on the T2 front, to be sure, but that price increase is accentuated by the increase in minerals as well. Really, its flattering that you give us so much credit, but our antics are accentuating effects, not primary drivers.
Alright, might have been giveing you more credit it seems. But curious on the amount of ISK given out for support for the permahulkageedon. Or if you will release those numbers someday.
It seems I fell for the mass hysteria. Been re-reading posts and it seems it comes from barges being to safe, as well as an overwhelming fear of bots. Not too sure about the bots.
It does seem this mining barge buff, would restore the economy after the drone nerf, but people do have a fear of bots, as well as wanting to gank miners alot. The tech pricing is strange, especially with CCP having a number they are shooting for or are trying to reach. Means this alchemy is mostly due to OTEC then. And almost siding with goons that it is all price fixing and not too much game applied.
It almost isn't price fixing, but what they expect of us sucks. Like CCP comes up with a way for us to help defeat OTEC, since we can't defeat it in game normally. But it doesn't bring pride to you that alchemy is the way to beat it I suppose. Like its more like price fixing, with the way CCP wants us to beat you goons and your allies.
Plus it kind of keeps old models in tact as well. As moons will still be the driving force for conflict in 0.0, as well as the main supply of tech. Of course that is if CCP price fixing plan works or not. Seem like their could be some things in its path though. Seems like bots will ruin this game more then goons will though. Kind of a suprise really.
Kind of wondering, what chances you are giving CCP to price fix well. And what chances you are given the other variables to mess up CCP's price fixing of tech? I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 34 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |