Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Aya Hekki
State War Academy Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:15:00 -
[331] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Dave stark wrote:the difference is, concord is the only defense that high sec miners have. high sec will never have intel on par with alliance intel channels in null, rarely will you have people ready to warp to you in combat ships if you really mess up and get tackled, etc.
there's a difference between "never being ganked" and "requires some effort/drawback to claim the free kill" balancing the game around the fact that hiseccers refuse to work together and refuse to fit their ships properly is dumb
I'm sick and tired of this bulshit, i hate mining and miners with all my heart, but the truth must be told.... "Fit a tank" ? what kind of bullshit is this? are you delusional? want me to point you out to the hulk killmails with huge tanks? yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough"
and my point of view on this suicide gank idiocy, why should it be profitable in the first place? I gank a guy that i hate, for the pleasure of killing him only, this can still be achieved easily. tell me again, why are you ganking random people with no skill alts with almost no cost and no risk? you would say "because it is fun hahaha", i will say exactly!! it is fun, so do it to have fun only.. but expect to lose some isk doing so like any other normal PvPer out there, am i right?
about your nonsense that goons made high sec mining even more profitable than the null sec .. are you listening to yourself? no thanks, i would rather the high sec minerals be less profitable Mr goony.
no tl;dr version for you lazy ones out there, read my wall of text  |

Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
1674
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:22:00 -
[332] - Quote
Aya Hekki wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Dave stark wrote:the difference is, concord is the only defense that high sec miners have. high sec will never have intel on par with alliance intel channels in null, rarely will you have people ready to warp to you in combat ships if you really mess up and get tackled, etc.
there's a difference between "never being ganked" and "requires some effort/drawback to claim the free kill" balancing the game around the fact that hiseccers refuse to work together and refuse to fit their ships properly is dumb I'm sick and tired of this bulshit, i hate mining and miners with all my heart, but the truth must be told.... "Fit a tank" ? what kind of bullshit is this? are you delusional? want me to point you out to the hulk killmails with huge tanks? yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough" and my point of view on this suicide gank idiocy, why should it be profitable in the first place? I gank a guy that i hate, for the pleasure of killing him only, this can still be achieved easily. tell me again, why are you ganking random people with no skill alts with almost no cost and no risk? you would say "because it is fun hahaha", i will say exactly!! it is fun, so do it to have fun only.. but expect to lose some isk doing so like any other normal PvPer out there, am i right? about your nonsense that goons made high sec mining even more profitable than the null sec .. are you listening to yourself? no thanks, i would rather the high sec minerals be less profitable Mr goony. no tl;dr version for you lazy ones out there, read my wall of text 
Show me a well tanked hulk that was ganked in high-sec with 3 catalyst.
|

Korsiri
Mousetrap Building Inc.
60
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 19:35:00 -
[333] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Might as well hand them golden tickets because the new barges are exactly the kind of ships miners will appreciate. My question is...
Why are you promoting harder ganks???
fixored for you ^_^
|

Pipa Porto
510
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 22:43:00 -
[334] - Quote
Aya Hekki wrote:I'm sick and tired of this bulshit, i hate mining and miners with all my heart, but the truth must be told.... "Fit a tank" ? what kind of bullshit is this? are you delusional? want me to point you out to the hulk killmails with huge tanks? yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough"
Stop lying. A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band. Put it in a highish sec band and it becomes prohibitively expensive to gank it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 23:31:00 -
[335] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:I run a mining corp on another account. Don't think I don't know about mining and what it takes to run a corp, or about mining in this game in general. I, as a player, am competing against players that do use bots and mine 23/7. I want to know what CCP is going to do to counter that problem now that they are just making easier for botters and AFK miners. This "oh we just banned a few miners for *two weeks* is not solving the problem.
People that cheat and use outside means(not built into the game) to play EVE hurts my game. I want to know what CCP is going to do about it sense they have now made it easier for people to do it. My Advice !!!
Relax...
|

Aya Hekki
State War Academy Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 23:40:00 -
[336] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Aya Hekki wrote: yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough" Stop lying. A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band. Put it in a highish sec band and it becomes prohibitively expensive to gank it.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13920646
one that i stumbled upon recently in the crime and punishment section, an original fit no doubt. but you cant deny that this guy sacrificed all the yield for the tank within the cpu and power capabilities of the hulk, and still got popped by 3xt1 **** fit cats.
So this is normal right? you said "A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band" .. so i went out of my way and tried to fit for the max absolutely crazy tank on eft, and all i could muster was 5k more effective HP than this guy in the link... add one more **** fit cat, and yo yo job is done, still profitable no matter what, so a couple more cats in the higher sec? big deal. it is a **** fit cat with no skill alts after all.
if you want to gank in high sec cool, but you should lose isk in the process, thats how it should be.. cant wait to try and gank one of those crazy new skiff barges :) |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
275
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 23:42:00 -
[337] - Quote
Aya Hekki wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Aya Hekki wrote: yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough" Stop lying. A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band. Put it in a highish sec band and it becomes prohibitively expensive to gank it. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13920646one that i stumbled upon recently in the crime and punishment section, an original fit no doubt. but you cant deny that this guy sacrificed all the yield for the tank within the cpu and power capabilities of the hulk, and still got popped by 3xt1 **** fit cats. So this is normal right? you said " A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band" .. so i went out of my way and tried to fit for the max absolutely crazy tank on eft, and all i could muster was 5k more effective HP than this guy in the link... add one more **** fit cat, and yo yo job is done, still profitable no matter what, so a couple more cats in the higher sec? big deal. it is a **** fit cat with no skill alts after all. if you want to gank in high sec cool, but you should lose isk in the process, thats how it should be.. cant wait to try and gank one of those crazy new skiff barges :)
he deserved that for mining omber. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Pipa Porto
510
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 23:48:00 -
[338] - Quote
Aya Hekki wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Aya Hekki wrote: yes that's right! 2-3 cats with t1 **** can still gank it. is that normal? you don't see anything wrong with this? and the comments on those mails were almos all alike "good tank but not enough" Stop lying. A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band. Put it in a highish sec band and it becomes prohibitively expensive to gank it. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13920646one that i stumbled upon recently in the crime and punishment section, an original fit no doubt. but you cant deny that this guy sacrificed all the yield for the tank within the cpu and power capabilities of the hulk, and still got popped by 3xt1 **** fit cats. So this is normal right? you said " A Hulk can easily be tanked to make it unprofitable to gank in any Sec band" .. so i went out of my way and tried to fit for the max absolutely crazy tank on eft, and all i could muster was 5k more effective HP than this guy in the link... add one more **** fit cat, and yo yo job is done, still profitable no matter what, so a couple more cats in the higher sec? big deal. it is a **** fit cat with no skill alts after all. if you want to gank in high sec cool, but you should lose isk in the process, thats how it should be.. cant wait to try and gank one of those crazy new skiff barges :)
That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Aya Hekki
State War Academy Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:00:00 -
[339] - Quote
I'm going to assume that there wasn't enough cpu or whatever to fit anything other that that survey, those fitting cpu and grid were too low when i tried it on eft, but then again iam no miner. i would like to see that 34k easily fitted hulk you are talking about, since as i said i tried and failed to get past 29k.
anyways, stupid max yield hulks will be everywhere as usual, and from my understanding, hulks didn't get a very large ehp buff, so why all the tears? the ones like that guy in the link is what i was talking about.. they try hard to fit a good tank, and here comes some alts with **** fits and kill him. that always seemed odd to me, and that what this update will be fixing hopefully. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
254
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:00:00 -
[340] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception? |
|

Pipa Porto
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:04:00 -
[341] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception?
Most combat ships are also flown actively.
If you want, you can be immune to ganks with a little bit of active flying instead of just tanking it.
Or you can fit a moderate tank and move to a higher sec band. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
198
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:22:00 -
[342] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Aya Hekki wrote:http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13920646 That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod. A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over. You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space. Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
It most certainly is not a terrible fit. Quit ******* lying. It sacrificed nearly all of it's yield for tank. It is exactly the fit and killmail that you've been claiming doesn't exist for days and even in the face of clear evidence of how wrong you are, you still ***** and cry and moan about the ebil bad men at CCP who made it unprofitable for you to gank exhumers in Highsec. You could double the number of Catalysts on that mail and STILL make a profit from the kill.
How many times do you need to be proven wrong before you stop crying about these necessary buffs that have been welcomed by the majority of the community? Even Soundwave has made it abundantly clear to you that the delusion you're living under of EVE being designed around profitable ganking is a myth and a lie. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1713
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:24:00 -
[343] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception? Most combat ships are also flown actively. If you want, you can be immune to ganks with a little bit of active flying instead of just tanking it. Or you can fit a moderate tank and move to a higher sec band.
Most combat ships are not made for a dumb profession that encourages looking at painting dry as an exciting alternative. Also, the guy asked you a precise question, don't derail.
"Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception?" Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
254
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 00:30:00 -
[344] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception? Most combat ships are also flown actively. If you want, you can be immune to ganks with a little bit of active flying instead of just tanking it. Or you can fit a moderate tank and move to a higher sec band. Their flown actively because they have an active role. Though, this doesn't change the fact that they are not simply expected to fill highs with guns and the rest with LSE's DCU's and plates. In order to have any chance of tanking there is only 1 viable fit and even then often needs the help of outside boosts from links to be able to sustain itself in an attack. In this fit everything is sacrificed that can be for tank. and this is for the best of the group of ships. |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
218
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 08:24:00 -
[345] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:You will need like three T2 talos to kill one of the new hulks in a 0.7 system. Skiffs mining ice in a 0.9 system are basically free money forever, unless someone assembles a 20 tornado team to kill them, which is hilarious unprofitable. the biggest question here is: why ganking should be profitable?  After all ganking is "somehow againts the law" because ganker gets killed by Concord. |

Pipa Porto
519
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 09:06:00 -
[346] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Werst Dendenahzees wrote:You will need like three T2 talos to kill one of the new hulks in a 0.7 system. Skiffs mining ice in a 0.9 system are basically free money forever, unless someone assembles a 20 tornado team to kill them, which is hilarious unprofitable. the biggest question here is: why ganking should be profitable?  After all ganking is "somehow againts the law" because ganker gets killed by Concord.
Ganking Hulks isn't profitably unless the victim fits their Hulk to allow it to be profitable to gank. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
202
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 09:20:00 -
[347] - Quote
It will definitely effect alot of areas of game play, like suicide ganking and ore theft.
They are ripping the game apart , very sad times indeed. It's just like seeing a friend with alzheimer fading away. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
278
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 09:23:00 -
[348] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:It will definitely effect alot of areas of game play, like suicide ganking and ore theft.
They are ripping the game apart , very sad times indeed. It's just like seeing a friend with alzheimer fading away.
i've seen 1 ganker since hulkageddon started, and i haven't seen a can flipper in like half a year. nobody bothers with those activities to begin with. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
202
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 09:28:00 -
[349] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:It will definitely effect alot of areas of game play, like suicide ganking and ore theft.
They are ripping the game apart , very sad times indeed. It's just like seeing a friend with alzheimer fading away. i've seen 1 ganker since hulkageddon started, and i haven't seen a can flipper in like half a year. nobody bothers with those activities to begin with.
Somebody give this guy the nobel prize. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Mallak Azaria
396
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:48:00 -
[350] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:And I am really not being sarcastic. It's almost impossible to gank with these changes, several players have said so and it sounds like they really know what they are talking about. I think it will be good if you can rub it in their face how wrong they are. I just hope they don't get discouraged for not being such good players.
Will probably just switch targets to be honest. Miners aren't the only ones that can be ganked for profit, or for a laugh. Mining Barge buff: CCP-áhas acknowledged that miners in general-áare too stupid to make the correct fitting choices to make ganking them unprofitable. |
|

Dun Bar
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
10
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:55:00 -
[351] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:why would you subscribe to a game just to mine imaginary minerals
Because we can. U mad bro? |

Pipa Porto
531
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 13:59:00 -
[352] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception?
Sure. But that's what you need to be safe while totally AFK. If you're paying attention at all, you can just warp off if a gank is incoming. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
218
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 14:03:00 -
[353] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Dave stark wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:It will definitely effect alot of areas of game play, like suicide ganking and ore theft.
They are ripping the game apart , very sad times indeed. It's just like seeing a friend with alzheimer fading away. i've seen 1 ganker since hulkageddon started, and i haven't seen a can flipper in like half a year. nobody bothers with those activities to begin with. Somebody give this guy the nobel prize. sometime it's better to keep silence when you have nothing to say......  |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:11:00 -
[354] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Pipa Porto wrote: That's a terrible fit. Also, he did not sacrifice all the yield for tank. See that Survey scanner? That's a yield mod, not a tank mod.
A Hulk can fit some 34k EHP vs Blasters while still having enough EM/EXP EHP to prevent Nados from taking over.
You cannot profitably kill a 34k EHP Hulk with Catalysts in .5 space.
Go to .8 space or higher and the loss to gank you becomes fairly significant.
Every fit that comes near that has no task dedicated mods. Most combat ships that don't fit some sort of utility or damage mod are considered fail fit. Apparently exhumers and barges are the exception? Sure. But that's what you need to be safe while totally AFK. If you're paying attention at all, you can just warp off if a gank is incoming. I've paid attention lots and I have never seen anyone advertise they are about to do a gank. Good gankers usually have a cloaked scout ship, gankers align to scout and warp to them -10km or -20km to land right next to their target. Target lock then open fire. Unless the target in question is near 3/4 max speed (required to warp), they may not have the quick reaction time to warp out before gankers open fire. Just being aligned to a target but not moving does not reduce the time to enter warp.
All of these people that gank (I cannot call them PvPs because they aren't really doing that) seem to think all of these measures are realistic and practical. Gotta stop thinking that way. Fact is, unless you have flagged a corp, or the person doing the ganking is flashy red, you cannot know which person in local may want to gank you. And even then, finding them in local if the numbers are high isn't always easy, especially if the system in question has traffic through it normally.
Having said all that, I am not saying it is unfair, this is the way it is and that's fine. Gives the gankers that are smart and organized the ability to get any target they want...if they really want to do it. If you don't think you can get the ship in question, simply switch targets to one you can gank. That's the way Eve is. If Hulks and other mining ships are no longer profitable to gank, go after Noctis. Chances are those have way better profits and those are easy kills. I got one no problem(with one of my other characters), without even a point on it, using long range missles. And this was in WH space where the pilots that are running ninja anomalies are paying attention. I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Pipa Porto
533
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:25:00 -
[355] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Sure. But that's what you need to be safe while totally AFK. If you're paying attention at all, you can just warp off if a gank is incoming. Unless the target in question is near 3/4 max speed (required to warp), they may not have the quick reaction time to warp out before gankers open fire. Just being aligned to a target but not moving does not reduce the time to enter warp.
Hey, yes, you can do that. That is one of the things you can do to stay 100% safe from gankers if you are ATK. There are even methods to reduce the absolute speed that 75% of your max speed represents.
By the way, Passive align is a myth. If you are at 0m/s, you are not aligned anywhere. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1228
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:25:00 -
[356] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote: If Hulks and other mining ships are no longer profitable to gank, go after Noctis. Chances are those have way better profits and those are easy kills. I got one no problem(with one of my other characters), without even a point on it, using long range missles. And this was in WH space where the pilots that are running ninja anomalies are paying attention. Even when paying attention, you say.
Perhaps Noctis needs some buff then ... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:27:00 -
[357] - Quote
Dun Bar wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:why would you subscribe to a game just to mine imaginary minerals Because we can. U mad bro? Why would anyone subscribe to a game to fly imaginary space ships in imaginary space? That's the real question. And my answer is this: I can't do it in real life and Eve makes space look good.
Whether I am popping rats or mining rocks or whatever, I actually take the time to look at the graphics and enjoy the game. And sometimes play some really nice space music in the background. It is really enjoyable. If anyone has a problem with me mining rocks in space...well obviously they have the problem, not me . I won't lose any sleep over them having problems. Sometimes its a nice break from all the noise and chaos of a house full of little kids - a nice way to mellow out a bit. Eve can give so much to so many players in so many ways. Those who limit themselves to only one portion of playing (whether it is mining or ganking or PvE or PvP) have only seen one portion of Eve and have not opened themselves to the full complexity that this game offers. I suggest staying off that pedestal that is used for preaching about what Eve is and admit that it can be lots of different things for different people...and let it go.
I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1475
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:29:00 -
[358] - Quote
Anvil44 wrote:finding them in local if the numbers are high isn't always easy
You're already making a mistake if you're mining in a system with a high local count. EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Cloned S0ul
Blood Fanatics
170
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:32:00 -
[359] - Quote
Because of Barges Teemo for president. |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
103
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 15:37:00 -
[360] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:By the way, Passive align is a myth. If you are at 0m/s, you are not aligned anywhere. Some people think passive align works. I wanted to point out that it doesn't. Thanks for the backup, maybe more people will take note.
Pipa Porto wrote: Hey, yes, you can do that. That is one of the things you can do to stay 100% safe from gankers if you are ATK. There are even methods to reduce the absolute speed that 75% of your max speed represents.
You are making an assumption or two here. 1) keeping at 3/4 speed, your target will stay in range for any length of time. Depending on targets, speed etc, it may not be simple to keep aligned in multiple directions while doing this. 2) player is in fleet of some sort. Yes people harp about this being a multi-player game and I am pretty sure most of those other ships I see are being run by other people (which therefore fulfills this being multi-player), this does not mean people are automatically in a fleet or even in a corp where others are online at the same time and able to work with them.
Otherwise, we should likewise assume that all gankers are going to be in fleets and have others working with them. In which case, a mining ship is going to get popped. Unless the gankers are not very competent.
Also competent gankers will bump a ship off course totally wrecking alignments. I've seen that happen. All it takes is the scout to uncloak and hit their microwarp drive while running straight at the mining ship. By the time the player realizes what is happening, they are bumped. See how easy it is to gank? This is why no one really needs to complain here. The good miners will be safe, the ones that want to just sit and afk mine will still get ganked. Everyone wins.
I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |