| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:Major Bibi wrote:look at it on the brightside , Gankers will need to work in teams and so promoting teamwork , it is a MMO rafterall Remember what happened to the last thing that promoted team work in high sec? Nerf bat to Incursions face!
yeah 140m/hr in risk-free isk was totally balanced a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:why would you subscribe to a game just to mine imaginary minerals Probably for the same reason people join a 50k man blob to fight imaginary enemies ... and to suicide on people mining imaginary minerals.
while I'm sure you've never shot anything but an NPC, those "50k man blobs" don't fight "imaginary" enemies because there are actually other people behind them a rogue goon |

dexington
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Major Bibi wrote:look at it on the brightside , Gankers will need to work in teams and so promoting teamwork , it is a MMO rafterall Remember what happened to the last thing that promoted team work in high sec? Nerf bat to Incursions face! yeah 140m/hr in risk-free isk was totally balanced
Are we talking about incursions or technetium? ;) GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:34:00 -
[34] - Quote
dexington wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Marconus Orion wrote:Major Bibi wrote:look at it on the brightside , Gankers will need to work in teams and so promoting teamwork , it is a MMO rafterall Remember what happened to the last thing that promoted team work in high sec? Nerf bat to Incursions face! yeah 140m/hr in risk-free isk was totally balanced Are we talking about incursions or technetium? ;)
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12204197 http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_related&kll_id=12842852
yeah tech is totally risk free, nobody ever fought over it ever
unlike incursions, of course a rogue goon |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
283
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:44:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ginseng Jita wrote:Might as well hand them golden tickets because the new barges are exactly the kind of ships AFK miners and botters will appreciate. My question is...
Why are you promoting AFK mining and botting CCP?
Not true at all... so your question is sadly irrelevant. Botting is against the EULA and they have never supported it. Being afk however is not.against the EULA There are many reason to be away from your keyboard....most of the time for a short period only - but no matter what the reason it produces nothing to be afk. Unlike botting multi boxing is not only not against the EULA; it is promoted by CCP (look at the difference if you are confused....) I know you like to mischaracterize all miners as botters to sell your whiney point. Still, I'm not hearing you whine about botting mission runners with "ungankable" ships...I guess cuz you like those ships. The truth again is differnt than you present.. the new ships are not "ungankable"... they are just sturdier.. as they should be.
Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always? [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:47:00 -
[36] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always?
generally ships need attention when they are underused
hulks, mackinaws, covetors and retrievers are anything but underused a rogue goon |

Covert0ne
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
4
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
I have the solution.
Add a new module that allows the player to launch a mining bomb. Said bomb instantly destroys all asteroids and transports the minerals to the nearest station.
Mining is now fixed. /thread. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
283
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:51:00 -
[38] - Quote
Quote:I'm bothered by the random tank buff the Mack is getting. It dilutes the Skiff's role, and it means that you really won't need to keep an eye out for gankers as you do now..
really?! random huh? The Mack had a real problem fitting a tank up il not with not enough resourse to fit a proper tank something did need to be done. are you pretending it didn't? miners will always have to watch for gankers. cry baby. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
283
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:53:00 -
[39] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always? generally ships need attention when they are underused hulks, mackinaws, covetors and retrievers are anything but underused
that's one reason anyway.... [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:55:00 -
[40] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:Quote:I'm bothered by the random tank buff the Mack is getting. It dilutes the Skiff's role, and it means that you really won't need to keep an eye out for gankers as you do now.. really?! random huh? The Mack had a real problem fitting a tank up til now. with not enough resourse to fit a proper tank, something did need to be done. are you pretending it didn't? miners will always have to watch for gankers. cry baby.
yeah because the appropriate response was to give it the EHP of a well-tanked HAC without the need for any hardeners
"miners can't figure out how to fit their ships, let's just do it for them" a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 12:56:00 -
[41] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always? generally ships need attention when they are underused that's one reason anyway....
ships either need attention when they're so worthless that they're underused, or terribly overpowered and overused
nobody was flying mining barges or exhumers, especially not hulks a rogue goon |

Danny Diamonds
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:01:00 -
[42] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always? generally ships need attention when they are underused that's one reason anyway.... ships either need attention when they're so worthless that they're underused, or terribly overpowered and overused nobody was flying mining barges or exhumers, especially not hulks
If there were only 5 combat ships to choose from, I bet we would see a lot of use in one ship there as well. Miners do not have the options available to them that PVE/PVP pilots do. To somehow claim that Hulks are broke because they are used by many miners is terribly short-sighted. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
283
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:01:00 -
[43] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Quote:I'm bothered by the random tank buff the Mack is getting. It dilutes the Skiff's role, and it means that you really won't need to keep an eye out for gankers as you do now.. really?! random huh? The Mack had a real problem fitting a tank up til now. with not enough resourse to fit a proper tank, something did need to be done. are you pretending it didn't? miners will always have to watch for gankers. cry baby. yeah because the appropriate response was to give it the EHP of a well-tanked HAC without the need for any hardeners "miners can't figure out how to fit their ships, let's just do it for them"
no, the appropriate response as to nerf barges to paper thin so the tiniest cheap combat ship only would have to breath on them hard to for a kill.  [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:01:00 -
[44] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:no, the appropriate response as to nerf barges to paper thin so the tiniest cheap combat ship only would have to breath on them hard to for a kill. 
the appropriate response was to leave them alone because they're working as intended
"oh, you got blown up by a catalyst? welcome to EVE, fit a tank" a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
Danny Diamonds wrote:To somehow claim that Hulks are broke because they are used by many miners is terribly short-sighted.
to claim that hulks need a boost in any sense in spite of the fact that they are so heavily used is terribly short-sighted a rogue goon |

Danny Diamonds
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:09:00 -
[46] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Danny Diamonds wrote:To somehow claim that Hulks are broke because they are used by many miners is terribly short-sighted. to claim that hulks need a boost in any sense in spite of the fact that they are so heavily used is terribly short-sighted
I never claimed that. Stop making **** up. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:11:00 -
[47] - Quote
Danny Diamonds wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Danny Diamonds wrote:To somehow claim that Hulks are broke because they are used by many miners is terribly short-sighted. to claim that hulks need a boost in any sense in spite of the fact that they are so heavily used is terribly short-sighted I never claimed that. Stop making **** up.
and I never said that hulks should be nerfed, but left alone a rogue goon |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition VORTEX RISING
91
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:14:00 -
[48] - Quote
Delicious goontears, awaits upcoming Drake nerf with glee. |

dexington
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Are you claiming that somehow barges did not need the attention?.. or are you just whining as always? generally ships need attention when they are underused that's one reason anyway.... ships either need attention when they're so worthless that they're underused, or terribly overpowered and overused nobody was flying mining barges or exhumers, especially not hulks
The Procurer was just useless, do to the small difference in skill required to fly the Retriever, the same was true when you compare Covetor with Hulk. You used the retriever when training for hulk, and the covetor when it was not safe to use the hulk. The mack and Skiff has the specialized bonus for ice and mercoxit, which makes them usefull, but only if you decide to mine that kind of material.
Saying that because people used the ships everything was fine, is just wrong. The ships was not useless, you just did not have any choice in what you wanted to fly. GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
dexington wrote:The Procurer was just useless, do to the small difference in skill required to fly the Retriever, the same was true when you compare Covetor with Hulk. You used the retriever when training for hulk, and the covetor when it was not safe to use the hulk. The mack and Skiff has the specialized bonus for ice and mercoxit, which makes them usefull, but only if you decide to mine that kind of material.
Saying that because people used the ships everything was fine, is just wrong. The ships was not useless, you just did not have any choice in what you wanted to fly.
Yeah tell me more about hisec miners mining mercoxit
You have plenty of choices, it's just that you feel entitled to fly the highest yield ships at all times. a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:Delicious goontears, awaits upcoming Drake nerf with glee.
pubbies, this is why we hit you a rogue goon |

dexington
66
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:You have plenty of choices, it's just that you feel entitled to fly the highest yield ships at all times.
Except for price and yield the T1 ships are all the same, and the T2 ships are specialized for mining one type of material.
Please explain what you mean with "plenty of choices", mining in cruisers and battleships? GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:36:00 -
[53] - Quote
dexington wrote:Please explain what you mean with "plenty of choices", mining in cruisers and battleships?
yes, actually a rogue goon |

Danny Diamonds
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:38:00 -
[54] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:dexington wrote:The Procurer was just useless, do to the small difference in skill required to fly the Retriever, the same was true when you compare Covetor with Hulk. You used the retriever when training for hulk, and the covetor when it was not safe to use the hulk. The mack and Skiff has the specialized bonus for ice and mercoxit, which makes them usefull, but only if you decide to mine that kind of material.
Saying that because people used the ships everything was fine, is just wrong. The ships was not useless, you just did not have any choice in what you wanted to fly. Yeah tell me more about hisec miners mining mercoxit You have plenty of choices, it's just that you feel entitled to fly the highest yield ships at all times.
So you are saying everyone should fly sub-optimal ships for every task? I do seem to recall fleets of Rifters for new players, and not many sitting in Condors. Same is true for every tier of ship. There are those worth flying, those that are clearly in the top 3, and there are those not worth flying. What kind of logic says someone should fly sub-optimal? |

dexington
67
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:41:00 -
[55] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:dexington wrote:Please explain what you mean with "plenty of choices", mining in cruisers and battleships? yes, actually
So "plenty of choices" means T2 when you can, if not covetor and rokh when you have not other choice.... up that's plenty of choices. GÇ£The best way to keep something bad from happening is to see it ahead of time, and you can't see it if you refuse to face the possibility.GÇ¥-á |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
Danny Diamonds wrote:So you are saying everyone should fly sub-optimal ships for every task? I do seem to recall fleets of Rifters for new players, and not many sitting in Condors. Same is true for every tier of ship. There are those worth flying, those that are clearly in the top 3, and there are those not worth flying. What kind of logic says someone should fly sub-optimal?
believe it or not there was once a time when battleship mining reigned a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1410
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:42:00 -
[57] - Quote
dexington wrote:So "plenty of choices" means T2 when you can, if not covetor and rokh when you have not other choice.... up that's plenty of choices.
You can still fly the best yield ships, just don't whine when you get blown up. a rogue goon |

highonpop
Void.Tech Fatal Ascension
157
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:42:00 -
[58] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:why would you subscribe to a game just to mine imaginary minerals
I ask myself this every time I activate my strips SEE YOU IN 319 STATION!!! WOOO HOOOO!!!!! |

Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
192
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:44:00 -
[59] - Quote
Botters don't care about how the mining ships are setup. They can work their programming to compensate regardless. That said, CCP has been very good about catching and banning botters so the question of "Is this benefiting botters" is a non-question. Can't mine when you're banned, no matter how favorable the new mining ships are.
That leaves afk miners.
Let me ask you.. do you expect traders to be staring at the market screen 24/7? Do you expect PI colony builders to watch their planets slowly extract the materials? No! The fact that you can earn income in EVE is already supported in other fields. Mining is a bit further down the afk/isk scale. It requires more active attention than PI, but also provides more Isk/hour. It requires less attention than, say, mission running or exploring, but also has less isk potential. (And risk)
Besides, with many asteroids containing only a few cycles of ore, mining cannot truely be afk playing. Heck, the buffs to extraction rates will only make those asteroids pop faster, requireing more attention from the player if they want to maintain efficency. In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse. |

Danny Diamonds
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 13:45:00 -
[60] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Danny Diamonds wrote:So you are saying everyone should fly sub-optimal ships for every task? I do seem to recall fleets of Rifters for new players, and not many sitting in Condors. Same is true for every tier of ship. There are those worth flying, those that are clearly in the top 3, and there are those not worth flying. What kind of logic says someone should fly sub-optimal? believe it or not there was once a time when battleship mining reigned
It is crap to have an industrialist have to train in battleship skills. That is like telling a fighting pilot he has to train an industrial ship (Like a Hulk) if he wants to tank a fleet battle or Incursion.
Makes zero sense. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |