| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tikera Tissant
39
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote: Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold.
Maybe you mean 55% extra yield with orca pilot skills and gank modules? And that is for every ship in the fleet. And you are for some reason keep forgetting the cycle losses from having to go back to the station.
2 hulks+orca = 4 machinaws give or take. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
507
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote: Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold.
Maybe you mean 55% extra yield with orca pilot skills and gank modules? And that is for every ship in the fleet. And you are for some reason keep forgetting the cycle losses from having to go back to the station. 2 hulks+orca = 4 machinaws give or take. You forgot the shield reps you have on the Orca as well. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Tigress Tionese
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:34:00 -
[33] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote: Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold.
Maybe you mean 55% extra yield with orca pilot skills and gank modules? And that is for every ship in the fleet. And you are for some reason keep forgetting the cycle losses from having to go back to the station. 2 hulks+orca = 4 machinaws give or take.
It's assumed that if you're using an orca to boost the hulks then you would be using an orca to boost the macks. 2 max yield hulks + orca is only 9% more yield than 2 max yield macks + orca.
The biggest difference is macks hold more than 4 times the ore, far less effort is needed and in paticular when mining ice this far outweighs any benefit you gain from the 9% more yield the hulk setup would give. You can literally leave your computer alone for half an hour while you fill up on ore, allowing you put out far longer mining sessions than you could in a hulk.
CCP wanted to do away with there being one best barge, before that was the hulk. All they've achieved is making the mackinkaw the new king barge and entirely crashed the ice market at the same time. The market prices of the hulk and mackinkaw reflect this, their prices have been completely reversed. The new mackinkaw costs the same amount as the old hulk, the new hulk costs the same amount as the old mackinkaw. The market doesn't lie. The majority are mining in Mackinkaws. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
507
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:39:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote:Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote: Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold.
Maybe you mean 55% extra yield with orca pilot skills and gank modules? And that is for every ship in the fleet. And you are for some reason keep forgetting the cycle losses from having to go back to the station. 2 hulks+orca = 4 machinaws give or take. It's assumed that if you're using an orca to boost the hulks then you would be using an orca to boost the macks. 2 max yield hulks + orca is only 9% more yield than 2 max yield macks + orca. The biggest difference is macks hold more than 4 times the ore, far less effort is needed and in paticular when mining ice this far outweighs any benefit you gain from the 9% more yield the hulk setup would give. You can literally leave your computer alone for half an hour while you fill up on ore, allowing you put out far longer mining sessions than you could in a hulk. CCP wanted to do away with there being one best barge, before that was the hulk. All they've achieved is making the mackinkaw the new king barge and entirely crashed the ice market at the same time. The market prices of the hulk and mackinkaw reflect this, their prices have been completely reversed. The new mackinkaw costs the same amount as the old hulk, the new hulk costs the same amount as the old mackinkaw. The market doesn't lie. The majority are mining in Mackinkaws. Why talk about Ice mining the prices are starting to flat line. You make a lot more money mining rocks because its not an afk activity. As to the market, have you considered that as it's a supply an demand market that atm a lot of solo miners are changing ships so the market cost has gone up because of demand? Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9001
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:48:00 -
[35] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote:Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold. You need to check your bonuses, unless you run the Mack with three MLU/IHUs, in which case it's not noticeably stronger than the Hulk. The size of the Hulk's ore hold is utterly irrelevant since you're not going to use it other than as a transition buffer. For all intents and purposes, it can be considered infinite.
Quote:The only reason to bring an Orca is for the gang mining boosts, and since it's already there, it may aswell do the job of hauling anyway, not that it's really needed though. GǪexcept that doing so means you lose the boosts for long periods of time, which reduces your yield. So instead you use the Orca as a huge cargo can GÇö another transfer buffer from which the actual haulers pull ore and take back to base.
So no, using the Orca as a belt shuttle is hideously inefficient unless you actually run with two of themGǪ and that's just slow and cumbersome compared to using an actual industrial hauler.
The Mack is not a good fleet hauler. It sacrifices yield for something you don't need GÇö space. It is also not a particularly good transport since it's slower, costlier, completely lacking in versatility (not to mention longer to train for). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Tigress Tionese
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote: Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold.
Maybe you mean 55% extra yield with orca pilot skills and gank modules? And that is for every ship in the fleet. And you are for some reason keep forgetting the cycle losses from having to go back to the station. 2 hulks+orca = 4 machinaws give or take. It's assumed that if you're using an orca to boost the hulks then you would be using an orca to boost the macks. 2 max yield hulks + orca is only 9% more yield than 2 max yield macks + orca. The biggest difference is macks hold more than 4 times the ore, far less effort is needed and in paticular when mining ice this far outweighs any benefit you gain from the 9% more yield the hulk setup would give. You can literally leave your computer alone for half an hour while you fill up on ore, allowing you put out far longer mining sessions than you could in a hulk. CCP wanted to do away with there being one best barge, before that was the hulk. All they've achieved is making the mackinkaw the new king barge and entirely crashed the ice market at the same time. The market prices of the hulk and mackinkaw reflect this, their prices have been completely reversed. The new mackinkaw costs the same amount as the old hulk, the new hulk costs the same amount as the old mackinkaw. The market doesn't lie. The majority are mining in Mackinkaws. Why talk about Ice mining the prices are starting to flat line. You make a lot more money mining rocks because its not an afk activity. As to the market, have you considered that as it's a supply an demand market that atm a lot of solo miners are changing ships so the market cost has gone up because of demand?
Yes, when the top barge loses its spot as the best mining barge as is replaced by another, it is expected that everyone will dump their hulks and switch to macks instead. Macks are in high demand and hulks are being dumped like an annoying girlfriend. Supply and demand, most people are switching to the new best barge. |

Tikera Tissant
39
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote:
It's assumed that if you're using an orca to boost the hulks then you would be using an orca to boost the macks. 2 max yield hulks + orca is only 9% more yield than 2 max yield macks + orca.
The biggest difference is macks hold more than 4 times the ore, far less effort is needed and in paticular when mining ice this far outweighs any benefit you gain from the 9% more yield the hulk setup would give. You can literally leave your computer alone for half an hour while you fill up on ore, allowing you put out far longer mining sessions than you could in a hulk.
CCP wanted to do away with there being one best barge, before that was the hulk. All they've achieved is making the mackinkaw the new king barge and entirely crashed the ice market at the same time. The market prices of the hulk and mackinkaw reflect this, their prices have been completely reversed. The new mackinkaw costs the same amount as the old hulk, the new hulk costs the same amount as the old mackinkaw. The market doesn't lie. The majority are mining in Mackinkaws.
The market also doesn't tell the truth either. The prices has also been changed because of manufacturing cost has also changed, plus its semi artificially being manipulated, as the demand of mackinaws has increased slightly, but not majorly. And as some solo miners switch to mackinaws, the manipulators are getting the hulks for cheaper. Same as the people who stole the retrievers from the market and are now selling them for a huge profit.
Also you said earlier "all mackinaws", not macks + orca. And people who mined ice already had mackinaws before for ice mining. That also didn't change at all. And afk mining ore? Seriously? go afk for 30 minutes and you come back after your ship sat for 15 minutes doing nothing because the ore you mined went empty. Mining ore afk is a complete waste of time.
And no, I don't agree with you that the majority moved to mackinaws. The majority will still be using what they used before the change, the hulk. New people might move to mackinaws, but most team miners will still go for hulks. |

Tigress Tionese
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:54:00 -
[38] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold. You need to check your bonuses, unless you run the Mack with three MLU/IHUs, in which case it's not noticeably stronger than the Hulk. The size of the Hulk's ore hold is utterly irrelevant since you're not going to use it other than as a transition buffer. For all intents and purposes, it can be considered infinite. Quote:The only reason to bring an Orca is for the gang mining boosts, and since it's already there, it may aswell do the job of hauling anyway, not that it's really needed though. GǪexcept that doing so means you lose the boosts for long periods of time, which reduces your yield. So instead you use the Orca as a huge cargo can GÇö another transfer buffer from which the actual haulers pull ore and take back to base. So no, using the Orca as a belt shuttle is hideously inefficient unless you actually run with two of themGǪ and that's just slow and cumbersome compared to using an actual industrial hauler.
I don't need to check anything, a mack can have near 20k EHP with 3 upgrades, which is enough.
The ore hold size is very relevant, with the hulk you need to do a lot more work, it's far more intensive, with the mack you can have a very laid back, semi afk or even totally afk mining session, you could even go make dinner and eat it, come back and you're still not fully on ore, that is an undeniably huge bonus. |

Tigress Tionese
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 13:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:
It's assumed that if you're using an orca to boost the hulks then you would be using an orca to boost the macks. 2 max yield hulks + orca is only 9% more yield than 2 max yield macks + orca.
The biggest difference is macks hold more than 4 times the ore, far less effort is needed and in paticular when mining ice this far outweighs any benefit you gain from the 9% more yield the hulk setup would give. You can literally leave your computer alone for half an hour while you fill up on ore, allowing you put out far longer mining sessions than you could in a hulk.
CCP wanted to do away with there being one best barge, before that was the hulk. All they've achieved is making the mackinkaw the new king barge and entirely crashed the ice market at the same time. The market prices of the hulk and mackinkaw reflect this, their prices have been completely reversed. The new mackinkaw costs the same amount as the old hulk, the new hulk costs the same amount as the old mackinkaw. The market doesn't lie. The majority are mining in Mackinkaws.
The market also doesn't tell the truth either. The prices has also been changed because of manufacturing cost has also changed, plus its semi artificially being manipulated, as the demand of mackinaws has increased slightly, but not majorly. And as some solo miners switch to mackinaws, the manipulators are getting the hulks for cheaper. Same as the people who stole the retrievers from the market and are now selling them for a huge profit. Also you said earlier "all mackinaws", not macks + orca. And people who mined ice already had mackinaws before for ice mining. That also didn't change at all. And afk mining ore? Seriously? go afk for 30 minutes and you come back after your ship sat for 15 minutes doing nothing because the ore you mined went empty. Mining ore afk is a complete waste of time. And no, I don't agree with you that the majority moved to mackinaws. The majority will still be using what they used before the change, the hulk. New people might move to mackinaws, but most team miners will still go for hulks.
The belt numbers don't lie, most people are using mackinkaws and it's T1 equivalent, retrievers. |

Hiyora Akachi
Bling Ring Tax Evaders
97
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:12:00 -
[40] - Quote
Yes, because they're the solo AFK miners. The corp miners who have access to an Orca are still using the hulks because with the bonuses from the Orca they have a better yield than a Macki.
Oh, also. Posting in a stealth "Why hulk not Miner god" thread. |

Tikera Tissant
39
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote: The belt numbers don't lie, most people are using mackinkaws and it's T1 equivalent, retrievers.
May I see those statistical numbers which shows exactly those numbers in full and through out the whole eve space?
Until than, the majority of the people where I live for example, are still flying hulks in ore belts with orca supports. None of them have moved to mackinaws.
And as said, solo players will of course use mackinaws instead of hulks. That doesn't mean the macks are the new gods.
And people who were flying retrievers, are still flying retrievers. They are cheap and still good. That didn't change one bit. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
492
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:24:00 -
[42] - Quote
LilRemmy wrote:Mining too easy now? I don't get this whine. ~pr0 mining~ Nothing Found |

Piugattuk
CLOROFLORFILAPLANKTONPLATES
14
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:24:00 -
[43] - Quote
Do you really want eve economy to become the Zimbabwe economy? prices for everything is out of wack, if miners can get back to work maybe this price madness will become sane again, besides if they are truly not bots this just made the hulk a true mining machine for corps dedicated to mining and those same bots will have to move over to the Mack or retriever making them easily identified as such because its all about cargo space where as the skiff is a great solo simi AFK ship with enough tank to make its a obvious choice for solo miner. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
443
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
OP the mack is hardly the best barge out there. It has been listed several times in several different threads. Which barge you use is highly conditional.
You might want to do a little more research next time.
EVERYBODY KNOWS |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9002
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 14:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote:I don't need to check anything GǪaside from your numbers, if you're going to make those claims. So no, the Hulk is a good upgrade and provides a significant boost when flown in fleets. It isn't significantly weaker and/or it has a good yield increase over the Mack.
Quote:The ore hold size is very relevant, with the hulk you need to do a lot more work, it's far more intensive GǪwhich doesn't matter since nothing stays in the ore hold and since you can always get it out of there before the next cycle hits. It's just there so the game doesn't spaz out when a cycle ends. Since it'll have fleet support (and, most notably, hauler support), the hold is effectively infinite and entirely irrelevant.
Either way, no, the Mack does not in any way obsolete industrials. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Toroup
Prometheus Deep Core Mining
25
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:22:00 -
[46] - Quote
The ice market has been crashed for a long time - White Glaze is consistently 260-270k per unit and nothing has changed. Anyone who thinks that the ice market is any different either had never mined ice or just doesn't pay attention.
End of the day, ore mining is much more profitable (to the tune of 22M/hour vs about 10M for ice). Like anything, you can't maximize output AFK. So those who want to bot/AFK will mine ice - but they are already the majority of those doing it. Those who want more isk will mine ore and will have to be ATK unless you want to mine a large rock of Veld (with Massive Scordite being the best hi-sec ore right now).
As far as the Hulk vs Mack - Hulk is a higher yield. Period. So if you jetcan or have a hauler it is more isk per hour. If you worry about can flippers or ore thieves then use a Mack. They all have their purpose. For me, I use a Covie and jetcan - better yield than a Mack and not much replacement cost if it gets spaced. Since I mine out a station that has a 0 take for refining, I refine the ore and haul it in with an industrial (since I don't have a 0 take in Jita). |

Tyrton
Imbecile MIiss Managment and Disasters Intergalactic Interstellar Interns
3
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:For belt hauling, the mackinkaw beats primary haulers at their own role. Forget the rest, i'm talking about belt hauling. GǪfor which a top-end industrial is still a better choice since it does it faster and in larger volume. In teams in particular, it allows you to switch from Macks to Hulk+Orca combos and leave everyone else in the belt, nicely boosted up. And even if this rather secondary use for industrials was ever so slightly intruded on by the Mack, then so what? It just means the Mack is doing its job as a solo miner and it doesn't make any difference for the value of industrials at large. Quote:The imbalance here is plain as day, no mining ship should be able to haul ore as well as or better than an actual dedicated hauler does. Good news: they don't. There is no imbalance.
Tippia I know you love this, taking apart someones one sided argument, how do you have the patience to hear the same argument over and over in different words ... It is quite apparent that he/she/it just plain refuses to even acknowledge that there is another side to this debate ..
Keep up the good fight the very least makes an "I hate change thread" entertaining. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
512
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:44:00 -
[48] - Quote
I think what needs to be done now is to get rid of NPC corps... now that you cant just insta gank these things anymore you should be able to war dec these people... just force them into thier respective faction warfare corp and there you have it... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2338
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Tigress Tionese wrote:Tippia wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:Hulks + Orca? There's a joke, 9% yield is not worth the extra hastle you get from being in a weaker ship with a much smaller ore hold. You need to check your bonuses, unless you run the Mack with three MLU/IHUs, in which case it's not noticeably stronger than the Hulk. The size of the Hulk's ore hold is utterly irrelevant since you're not going to use it other than as a transition buffer. For all intents and purposes, it can be considered infinite. Quote:The only reason to bring an Orca is for the gang mining boosts, and since it's already there, it may aswell do the job of hauling anyway, not that it's really needed though. GǪexcept that doing so means you lose the boosts for long periods of time, which reduces your yield. So instead you use the Orca as a huge cargo can GÇö another transfer buffer from which the actual haulers pull ore and take back to base. So no, using the Orca as a belt shuttle is hideously inefficient unless you actually run with two of themGǪ and that's just slow and cumbersome compared to using an actual industrial hauler. I don't need to check anything, a mack can have near 20k EHP with 3 upgrades, which is enough. The ore hold size is very relevant, with the hulk you need to do a lot more work, it's far more intensive, with the mack you can have a very laid back, semi afk or even totally afk mining session, you could even go make dinner and eat it, come back and you're still not full on ore, that is an undeniably huge bonus. This applies to ice mining obviously.
In the race between greedy and lazy, lazy (for the moment) is winning.
Whodathunkit?  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4300
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:49:00 -
[50] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:I think what needs to be done now is to get rid of NPC corps... now that you cant just insta gank these things anymore you should be able to war dec these people... just force them into thier respective faction warfare corp and there you have it...
Heh they can most definitely be ganked, easily "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
253
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
I would love to have been a fly on the wall when the discussions of mining barge spec changes were taking place.
Given Soundwave's antipathy towards high sec, especially when it comes to afk income, there must have been real wars inside CCP to get these changes through.
Thank goodness some sanity prevailed within CCP and these changes were made.
And yes, I have read Soundwave's comments defending these changes. He is toeing the company line, which is what he should do. |

Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
132
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:52:00 -
[52] - Quote
The rebalance is nice, but they pretty much screwed the hulk over completely.
The yield on the skiff and mack is way too close to the hulk. The mack gets a good tank. The skiff has a very good ore hold. The hulk has a small margin in yield, no tank, and no storage capacity.
Remove the extra yield role bonus from the mack and retriever, and give the skiff and proc a bonus to make it equivalent to the mack. There is no reason why they should have comparable yield to the hulk, when the hulk has nowhere near the tank or storage the other 2 both get. I wouldn't even fly a hulk in perfectly supported and protected null ops, which is what it is now designed for. I'd take a mack so I wouldn't have to pay as much attention, with the hold and the tank for the rat spawns. |

Lilianna Star
State War Academy Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 15:58:00 -
[53] - Quote
Hulk still has better yield so it's still better for ops. |

Fearless M0F0
Incursion PWNAGE Asc
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:01:00 -
[54] - Quote
I don't see the point of this thread. I'm pretty sure the only industrial with capacity for a full jetcan is the rigged Iteron V. So you are whining because you don't need rigged Itty 5 in ur mining ops anymore? 
Also, the patch is like... 5 days old, kinda premature to complain about exhumer prices, isn't it?  |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
148
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:02:00 -
[55] - Quote
Dorian Wylde wrote:The hulk has a small margin in yield
Only ship that gets close is Covetor.
Dorian Wylde wrote:no tank
[Hulk, 31,3k EHP]
Damage Control II Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
Medium F-S9 Regolith Shield Induction Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II
Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Dorian Wylde wrote:and no storage capacity.
101k + 50k + 40k m3.
[Orca]
Expanded Cargohold II Expanded Cargohold II
Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Mining Foreman Link - Laser Optimization II Mining Foreman Link - Mining Laser Field Enhancement II Siege Warfare Link - Shield Harmonizing II
Large Cargohold Optimization II Large Cargohold Optimization II Large Cargohold Optimization I
|

Skeln Thargensen
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:09:00 -
[56] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:I think what needs to be done now is to get rid of NPC corps... now that you cant just insta gank these things anymore you should be able to war dec these people... just force them into thier respective faction warfare corp and there you have it...
you can still pop retrievers and mackinaws. it's just more expensive or more difficult, depending whether you intend on bringing a buddy. (or seven)
Anyway, people with sense just retreated into mining missions instead of bleating about the gankers before. they are now awash with targets if they have the ISK to blow. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
512
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:11:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote:MeBiatch wrote:I think what needs to be done now is to get rid of NPC corps... now that you cant just insta gank these things anymore you should be able to war dec these people... just force them into thier respective faction warfare corp and there you have it... Heh they can most definitely be ganked, easily
i was runing the number got around a 30k ehp tank on the mack... not bad... not safe either...
how many catalysts do you need now to kill one?
with heat on you get what 650 dps out of each one? so 4 do 2600 dps so in 11 seconds its dead... not bad at all i guess... just takes more coordination... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

Julien Brellier
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:14:00 -
[58] - Quote
Hulk just got more hitpoints, more cpu and more powergird. It has a stronger tank than before the patch and it still by far the king of pure yield. Before the patch your Hulk would fill up in perhaps 3 cycles and now it's gone down to one. Hulk pilots now have to pay a little bit more attention during mining ops. Boo hoooooooooo |

Tigress Tionese
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
Julien Brellier wrote:Hulk just got more hitpoints, more cpu and more powergird. It has a stronger tank than before the patch and it still by far the king of pure yield. Before the patch your Hulk would fill up in perhaps 3 cycles and now it's gone down to one. Hulk pilots now have to pay a little bit more attention during mining ops. Boo hoooooooooo
More yield by far? You call 9% a lot? Infact all of the barges yields are very close to each. The mackinkaws tank is also stronger , even when running a max yield fit than the max yield Hulk.
Hulk, 9% more yield than Mack Mack, over 400% more ore holding space than Hulk
Cargo space is a godsend, i don't know why they decided to make it so stupidly high. |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
61
|
Posted - 2012.08.12 16:29:00 -
[60] - Quote
Greetings
Eve pilots. Never a more finicky crew of panty waists and complainers. The reason the barges were buffed was because of a successful never ending b*tching campaign by the "bears" of EVE. The intend of which was to increase mining by introducing roll based ships as opposed to linear progression based ships , making minerals more available, driving manufacturing costs down, and stabilizing the market. Add the addition of Alchemy in an attempt to stabilize Tech and T2 prices, we might also see a decrease in ship prices as well.
2 cents IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |