| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:22:00 -
[211] - Quote
MisterNick wrote:Pre-patch: "Waaaaa my barge is made of paper and dies if you look at it the wrong way"Post-patch: "Waaaa those mean Mackinaws hurt my hauler's feelings"In other news, -ú50 notes don't fit in my wallet very well  Think you might as well scrap the haulers in belts? Feel free. If you're really so bothered about min-maxing though you'll notice that if you just haul with your Mack then you lose out on mining time while shuttling between station and belt.
Exept macks are not to be warships. Yet they can stand up to 2 Tornado Alpha's. Face facts CCP ALWAYS over react to miners scremaing, they did it in Jihad an they did it this week again.
Miners/afk/botters because to be honest afk'ers are one step removed from filthy bots... Refuse point blank to EVER take any responsibility for their game play. They demanded an were given full immunity an freedom to bot in peace which is what they want. Anywhere.
Try telling a miner that he can be utterly an completely safe in HS drop can mining an he just flat out ignores you. Because he Doesn't want to use D scan Doesn't want to mission belt mine Doesn't want to pay attention to local Doesn't want to ask others who the local gankers are Doesn't want to Move away from hub systems where it's safe.
They just flat out dont want to play, they want the game to be played for them.
It is impossible to get killed if you pay an ounce of attention an as much as the miners will try to tell you it isn't fair that they should follow the rule set rest of us have to facts are they are lazy, arrogant an know that to get anything they want, they just demand it off CCP/blizzard. |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:24:00 -
[212] - Quote
Suddenly Boom wrote:Terraferma K10 wrote:Why aren't there Hulks in the sea of Macks? Would you park your lambo in a ghetto surrounded by hondas?
Just look at how most of you guys are reacting: "Must find hulk must find hulk must find hulk." Most of my ganker friends are feverishly jumping from system to system looking for hulks. Knowing this, would you be driving one of the most sought after targets or would you just bite the X% yield loss to have T-Rexs gloss over you in their "wtf another mack" rage?
Given my island bordering losec, I'll eat a little less yield to not have the insta-kill "hulk" label while PvPers are going crazy looking for blood during this time of change.
I recognize most mack-ers aren't using this mentality, but I posit that there are many hulk-ers (those with 2-3 accounts, orca/hauler support) abiding by this idea. Hell, I've never used a mack before and I bought 10-12 as soon as CCP wrote about their intended changes. There's no reason for hulks to be sought after over macs, since the patch their market prices have switched places, mackinkaws are now the expensive ship that is going to cause the most loss to a miner when ganked.
except hulks can be killed (if your really lucky). I attacked a hulk other night with blasters, an he just ignored me, I did scratch damage top him. |

Suddenly Boom
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:56:00 -
[213] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:Suddenly Boom wrote:Terraferma K10 wrote:Why aren't there Hulks in the sea of Macks? Would you park your lambo in a ghetto surrounded by hondas?
Just look at how most of you guys are reacting: "Must find hulk must find hulk must find hulk." Most of my ganker friends are feverishly jumping from system to system looking for hulks. Knowing this, would you be driving one of the most sought after targets or would you just bite the X% yield loss to have T-Rexs gloss over you in their "wtf another mack" rage?
Given my island bordering losec, I'll eat a little less yield to not have the insta-kill "hulk" label while PvPers are going crazy looking for blood during this time of change.
I recognize most mack-ers aren't using this mentality, but I posit that there are many hulk-ers (those with 2-3 accounts, orca/hauler support) abiding by this idea. Hell, I've never used a mack before and I bought 10-12 as soon as CCP wrote about their intended changes. There's no reason for hulks to be sought after over macs, since the patch their market prices have switched places, mackinkaws are now the expensive ship that is going to cause the most loss to a miner when ganked. except hulks can be killed (if your really lucky). I attacked a hulk other night with blasters, an he just ignored me, I did scratch damage top him.
Yes hulks can be killed but there's no longer a reason to target them specifically, hulks are now the cheaper ship because everyone is switching to asteroid solo pwnmobile macs. |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp.
448
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 00:58:00 -
[214] - Quote
oh look, every one is switching to mackinaws.
like i didn't predict this one coming a month ago... Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 01:09:00 -
[215] - Quote
For real no idear, why people like OP have so much hate against miner :(.
You can PvP with one ACC. I don't talk about solo PvP! Just one account. (Two+ acc provide much more risk as it's likely to lose one if you don't pay attantion). You can PvE with one ACC. Two are helpy but realy no need for Missions/Plexing/Ratting. But you could NOT solo mine till this patch!
One of the most simple actions couldn't be done solo? That was just WRONG! Either you used jet-cans but more often then not some wannabe Rambo tryed to steal your ore or flip the can. Many times when I docked to switch from Bark to Hauler I found empty cans :(. Or you hauled every 5 mins which was a pain (most missions requier more time if you don't blitz them).
Now I don't have to dock to get my bounty (ore) to the station :). Finaly I can mine with ONE account like I can PvE with just one and PvP with just one.
So the only one who cry like pink babys about this change are can flippers and ore thiefs.
And to be honest ... WHO CARES! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 01:13:00 -
[216] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:For real no idear, why people like OP have so much hate against miner :(.
You can PvP with one ACC. I don't talk about solo PvP! Just one account. (Two+ acc provide much more risk as it's likely to lose one if you don't pay attantion). You can PvE with one ACC. Two are helpy but realy no need for Missions/Plexing/Ratting. But you could NOT solo mine till this patch!
One of the most simple actions couldn't be done solo? That was just WRONG! Either you used jet-cans but more often then not some wannabe Rambo tryed to steal your ore or flip the can. Many times when I docked to switch from Bark to Hauler I found empty cans :(. Or you hauled every 5 mins which was a pain (most missions requier more time if you don't blitz them).
Now I don't have to dock to get my bounty (ore) to the station :). Finaly I can mine with ONE account like I can PvE with just one and PvP with just one.
So the only one who cry like pink babys about this change are can flippers and ore thiefs.
And to be honest ... WHO CARES!
LOL see what I mean, this guy is the prime example. Totally ignored the facts an the few simple rules you can follow to be safe. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9089
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 01:37:00 -
[217] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:Exept macks are not to be warships. Yet they can stand up to 2 Tornado Alpha's. So could the Hulks of yore. Luckily, as with those Hulk, the miners have this interesting tendency of not fitting tanks to their ships, making the Macks as vulnerable to Tornados as those old Hulks.
GǪnot that you need a Tornado to kill such a ship.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:01:00 -
[218] - Quote
Melodee619 wrote:LOL see what I mean, this guy is the prime example. Totally ignored the facts an the few simple rules you can follow to be safe. YouMad?
But I see what you mean :)
"BUHAHAH, I was a can flipper and now I can't do my wannabe Rambo stuff anymore, MAAAAAMMMMMIIII, they took my lollypop!!!!!1111" Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Melodee619
The Scope Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:27:00 -
[219] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Melodee619 wrote:LOL see what I mean, this guy is the prime example. Totally ignored the facts an the few simple rules you can follow to be safe. YouMad? But I see what you mean :) "BUHAHAH, I was a can flipper and now I can't do my wannabe Rambo stuff anymore, MAAAAAMMMMMIIII, they took my lollypop!!!!!1111" PS: want to gank multi million ISK ships? BRING MULTI MILLION ISK SHIPS! 300m isk should die? invest 300m!
No idea what you were trying to say bnut i get the gist of it. A. I dont cry I state facts B. who made you miners so special that you dont rate following the rule set like rest of us. C I am not a flipper. I dont need isk I kill for fun, period. D.I dont get angry this is a computer game nothing more. it ceases to exist once I log off. E. You botters/afkers are ones who did all the crying because you want to have CCP play eve for you, hence these idiotic changes. As I said before, before these changes following 5 simple rules means you NEVER die.. but that was too much for you lol.
You miners are giggle worthy I'll give you that, you demand to be protected by CCP yet for years you have been told how to remove any risk to your gaming/botting an you just ignore it.you lot are actually worse than mission runners who are now demanding CCP remove any risk to their gaming too.
Amusing.
edit as for spending isk. You choose to mine, you take on the cost, your fault when you die, none els. I personally spend up to 200 million per kill |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9089
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:31:00 -
[220] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:PS: want to gank multi million ISK ships? BRING MULTI MILLION ISK SHIPS! 300m isk should die? invest 300m! Fortunately, the game doesn't operate on that kind of class/level-game logic.
Cost is not a balancing factor.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:38:00 -
[221] - Quote
Tippia wrote: Cost is not a balancing factor.
hmmmm.... |

James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2386
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:42:00 -
[222] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:PS: want to gank multi million ISK ships? BRING MULTI MILLION ISK SHIPS! 300m isk should die? invest 300m! Why should we bring 300 million isk ships if miners won't fit <1 million isk tank mods? 
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½The daily saga of one man's quest to bring civilization to highsec by bumping miners out of range. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4358
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:43:00 -
[223] - Quote
itt: people think that hisec ganking is supposed to be balanced across all sec bands by the cost of the ships involved "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 02:57:00 -
[224] - Quote
Realy no idear why some of you rage so much.
Isn't this game called a SANDBOX game? Doesn't the one who like to mine pay the same real money as you do equal what you do?
If they want to afk-mine and have fun doing it .. what the hell is your damn problem????? They found their little corner in this SANDBOX like you found your corner.
If I check the forums I allways find semi-arguments like: "I do nothing wrong, it's legit game mechanic" or "I do it for fun". You must be realy short mindet, if you belive, your way is the only true way people can have fun (and should be allowed to have fun)!
Yes, I do semi-afk mining too and I LOVE it! I pay ~12,-Gé¼ each month just to be able to do it (and no, not plex, I use real money!!). While I do it, I watch TV or read a book or do my normal hause work (the stuff you have to do if you have no mom anymore). In addition I invest several hundret million ISK to make my miner a good miner (tank or yield or mix what ever I like).
So where is your damn legitimation which says: you just need 20m to destroy this?? Right, there is no such legitimation!! And your:" buhaha but I want to" is by far not enough! It's not even worth the hot air comming out of your mouth. Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4358
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:01:00 -
[225] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Realy no idear why some of you rage so much.
Isn't this game called a SANDBOX game? Doesn't the one who like to mine pay the same real money as you do equal what you do?
If they want to afk-mine and have fun doing it .. what the hell is your damn problem????? They found their little corner in this SANDBOX like you found your corner.
If I check the forums I allways find semi-arguments like: "I do nothing wrong, it's legit game mechanic" or "I do it for fun". You must be realy short mindet, if you belive, your way is the only true way people can have fun (and should be allowed to have fun)!
Yes, I do semi-afk mining too and I LOVE it! I pay ~12,-Gé¼ each month just to be able to do it (and no, not plex, I use real money!!). While I do it, I watch TV or read a book or do my normal hause work (the stuff you have to do if you have no mom anymore). In addition I invest several hundret million ISK to make my miner a good miner (tank or yield or mix what ever I like).
So where is your damn legitimation which says: you just need 20m to destroy this?? Right, there is no such legitimation!! And your:" buhaha but I want to" is by far not enough! It's not even worth the hot air comming out of your mouth.
sorry, sandbox doesn't mean "you can do whatever your lil heart desires with zero chance of any interference from other players" "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

ashley Eoner
43
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:05:00 -
[226] - Quote
Andski wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:Realy no idear why some of you rage so much.
Isn't this game called a SANDBOX game? Doesn't the one who like to mine pay the same real money as you do equal what you do?
If they want to afk-mine and have fun doing it .. what the hell is your damn problem????? They found their little corner in this SANDBOX like you found your corner.
If I check the forums I allways find semi-arguments like: "I do nothing wrong, it's legit game mechanic" or "I do it for fun". You must be realy short mindet, if you belive, your way is the only true way people can have fun (and should be allowed to have fun)!
Yes, I do semi-afk mining too and I LOVE it! I pay ~12,-Gé¼ each month just to be able to do it (and no, not plex, I use real money!!). While I do it, I watch TV or read a book or do my normal hause work (the stuff you have to do if you have no mom anymore). In addition I invest several hundret million ISK to make my miner a good miner (tank or yield or mix what ever I like).
So where is your damn legitimation which says: you just need 20m to destroy this?? Right, there is no such legitimation!! And your:" buhaha but I want to" is by far not enough! It's not even worth the hot air comming out of your mouth. sorry, sandbox doesn't mean "you can do whatever your lil heart desires with zero chance of any interference from other players" You are completely correct sir. That's why I'm glad I can still gank people that need to die.. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9089
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:15:00 -
[227] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Isn't this game called a SANDBOX game? Doesn't the one who like to mine pay the same real money as you do equal what you do?
If they want to afk-mine and have fun doing it .. what the hell is your damn problem????? They found their little corner in this SANDBOX like you found your corner. The problem is that they have this tendency to demand that their little corner be made exclusive to them and not let the rest of the sandbox players in (but they must still be allowed access to the rest of the sandbox)GǪ
GǪwhich ironically means that they haven't quite understood what this whole sandbox thing means. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 03:56:00 -
[228] - Quote
Andski wrote: sorry, sandbox doesn't mean "you can do whatever your lil heart desires with zero chance of any interference from other players"
They do over the market ... which by the defenition of many gankers is PvP too ... as everywhere is PvP. This is one of the standart answares of GANKERS! Market = PvP! So it comes from guys like YOU!
So again, what is your problem?
PS: oh and YOU can do what you want and should be allowed to do it .... but other are NOT allowed and should NOT be allowed to do what they want? Can imagin just one word for this: AROGANT Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 04:25:00 -
[229] - Quote
Andski wrote:itt: people think that hisec ganking is supposed to be balanced across all sec bands by the cost of the ships involved
When devs post stuff like "The money you paid for a ship to gank with compared to the money lost by your target was completely off", it sounds like cost IS being used to balance the game. And to a certain degree, they should continue to do so. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
151
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 05:34:00 -
[230] - Quote
James 315 wrote:Why should we bring 300 million isk ships if miners won't fit <1 million isk tank mods? 
8,4M > 1M
Andski wrote:sorry, sandbox doesn't mean "you can do whatever your lil heart desires with zero chance of any interference from other players"
But only thing you care about is your stupid profit. If only thing you want is to interfere, why do you care about your little iskies?
You can still gank my Rokh in 1.0 system if you so want. But no, you don't do it because you will lose money! |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1689
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 09:04:00 -
[231] - Quote
Quote:PS: oh and YOU can do what you want and should be allowed to do it .... but other are NOT allowed and should NOT be allowed to do what they want? That's the carebears-attitude, you genius.
The carebears believe they have a right to be safe, while the gankers try to show them they have not.
The carebears are wrong ! Are you people that dumb ? Really ? The game mechanics *clearly show* that everybody can do what they want ! The carebears can do what they want too, but they DIE BECAUSE OF IT AND IT'S THEIR OWN FAULT !
That's the game ! Is it that hard to grasp ? o_O
It's not about "a way to play" ! It's about "what do game mechanics allow me to do" !
Just kill 'em all ! Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:21:00 -
[232] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Quote:PS: oh and YOU can do what you want and should be allowed to do it .... but other are NOT allowed and should NOT be allowed to do what they want? That's the carebears-attitude, you genius. The carebears believe they have a right to be safe, while the gankers try to show them they have not. Sorry but this is what wannabe mini Rambos belive.
They belive, they are heroic, when they kill helpless targets. They allways cry "this is sandbox". They belive, they can DICTATE, what everyone should do.
And as soon as someone does not worship this mini Rambos they start to flame and flood the forum like pink babys.
Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9094
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:38:00 -
[233] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Sorry but this is what wannabe mini Rambos belive. No, it's what the carebears believe. The mini-rambos don't think you shouldn't be allowed to do what you want. They think you should learn how the game works and the consequences of your choices rather than come screaming for changes when those choices blow up in your face.
Quote:They belive, they are heroic, when they kill helpless targets. They allways cry "this is sandbox". They belive, they can DICTATE, what everyone should do. Can you provide an example of this?
Quote:Oh and btw ... which ships do you want to fly without miner? No miner => no production => NO SHIPS FOR YOU! If there were no miners left, the actual industrialists would step in and the production would just keep going. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4360
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:47:00 -
[234] - Quote
Smohq Anmirorz wrote:Andski wrote:itt: people think that hisec ganking is supposed to be balanced across all sec bands by the cost of the ships involved When devs post stuff like "The money you paid for a ship to gank with compared to the money lost by your target was completely off", it sounds like cost IS being used to balance the game. And to a certain degree, they should continue to do so.
tell me exactly how you can require x amount of isk to gank, say, a hulk "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1689
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 10:54:00 -
[235] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Sorry but this is what wannabe mini Rambos belive.
They belive, they are heroic, when they kill helpless targets. They allways cry "this is sandbox". They belive, they can DICTATE, what everyone should do.
And as soon as someone does not worship this mini Rambos they start to flame and flood the forum like pink babys "mumi, they don't want to play like I play *whine whine whine*".
Oh and btw ... which ships do you want to fly without miner? No miner => no production => NO SHIPS FOR YOU!
Ah, I see, you just want to run your own mining bots :D. That's why no other player should be allowed to do it. NOW I understand *enlight*.
What Tippia said. Nothing more needs to be added.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:02:00 -
[236] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:Sorry but this is what wannabe mini Rambos belive. No, it's what the carebears believe. The mini-rambos don't think you shouldn't be allowed to do what you want. They think you should learn how the game works and the consequences of your choices rather than come screaming for changes when those choices blow up in your face. You are the best excample that I am right. You cry "I can't do anymore what I want to do". You expect, you can do what you want and noone is allowed to stop your doing ... not even CCP.
[/quote]Quote:They belive, they are heroic, when they kill helpless targets. They allways cry "this is sandbox". They belive, they can DICTATE, what everyone should do. Can you provide an example of this?[/quote] Again your posts are the best excample. "I show them how they have to play this game". WHO are you? Who gave YOU the right to do it? So YOU try to dictate the Miners how they should play! Oh, it's sandbox so YOU can do whatever you want (gank) ... but not the miners god forbid!! And the only reason you post here is, that you now can't do it with just 20m but need to invest 300m.
Someone told you: what you do has not enough risk ... and that's why you are so angry now
Quote:Quote:Oh and btw ... which ships do you want to fly without miner? No miner => no production => NO SHIPS FOR YOU! If there were no miners left, the actual industrialists would step in and the production would just keep going. ROFL what?? This is just stupid! Most if not all Miners ARE allready Producer. And nealy every Producer is Miner at the same time. Except the Producer is a ISK-maker Alt for something else.
And even if there would be anything corect about your false statement ... you would never care if you gank a bot, a semi-afk, an active or an producer ... you just want to gank! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Zishy
Demon-War-Lords Fatal Ascension
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:06:00 -
[237] - Quote
Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:
For belt hauling, the mackinkaw beats primary haulers at their own role. Forget the rest, i'm talking about belt hauling. There's no need to use a hauler anymore, infact even if you're mining in a team, you're better of mining with all mackinkaws, a hauler is not going to increase your yield, infact it will decrease, you're better off with all mackinkaws and no hauler. It's far easier, and you get more ore.
The imbalance here is plain as day, no mining ship should be able to haul ore as well as or better than an actual dedicated hauler does. If you really want a dedicated hauler anyway, just use another Mackinkaw, it can mine between hauling sessions. If you're going to do that though you may aswell just use each miner as its own hauler anyway. God, this is so dumb.
You are dead wrong. When mining in a team you are mining in hulks. They dump their load to the orca, and the orca either takes the ore to the station, or you are using another orca to transfer the ore to the station. There is absolutely no reason to use mackinaws in a team ops. Even when not tanked they will not do as much m3/hour as a tanked hulk with a booster orca. No need to go and dump your load means lots more cycles dedicated to mining than flying to station, which makes the ops a hell of alot more efficient. Using macks in a team is very in-efficient. For a solo miner, its retriever->mackinaw. For a group miner its retriever->hulk. For a null miner its mainly a skiff.
what kind of bullshit are you writing here.
solo miner = mackinaw group miner = mackinaw>hulk null miner = mackinaw>hulk
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
157
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:12:00 -
[238] - Quote
Zishy wrote:Tikera Tissant wrote:Tigress Tionese wrote:
For belt hauling, the mackinkaw beats primary haulers at their own role. Forget the rest, i'm talking about belt hauling. There's no need to use a hauler anymore, infact even if you're mining in a team, you're better of mining with all mackinkaws, a hauler is not going to increase your yield, infact it will decrease, you're better off with all mackinkaws and no hauler. It's far easier, and you get more ore.
The imbalance here is plain as day, no mining ship should be able to haul ore as well as or better than an actual dedicated hauler does. If you really want a dedicated hauler anyway, just use another Mackinkaw, it can mine between hauling sessions. If you're going to do that though you may aswell just use each miner as its own hauler anyway. God, this is so dumb.
You are dead wrong. When mining in a team you are mining in hulks. They dump their load to the orca, and the orca either takes the ore to the station, or you are using another orca to transfer the ore to the station. There is absolutely no reason to use mackinaws in a team ops. Even when not tanked they will not do as much m3/hour as a tanked hulk with a booster orca. No need to go and dump your load means lots more cycles dedicated to mining than flying to station, which makes the ops a hell of alot more efficient. Using macks in a team is very in-efficient. For a solo miner, its retriever->mackinaw. For a group miner its retriever->hulk. For a null miner its mainly a skiff. what kind of bullshit are you writing here. solo miner = mackinaw group miner = mackinaw>hulk null miner = mackinaw>hulk LOL??? Did you read the DEV-Blog?
In a group where you have Haulers Hulk>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mackinaw. If you mine in dangures areas Skif >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mackinaw. If you are to lazy anything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> YOU 
The numbers don't lie. You do! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1689
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:15:00 -
[239] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:... bla ...
You simply don't get the game ... that's all ... and in the same moment you keep blaming us for forcing "our way of playing" onto you, while you just keep ignoring that we don't ... and keep ignoring how the game works.
We just play the game how we can. You do that too, but your ignorance hinders you of the realization that if you play the way you want to ... you will get blown up.
You try to keep this at a personal level ("YOU FORCE US"), while it's not.
The only group trying to force things onto others is the carebears, because they believe they have a right to be left alone ... ... while the game mechanics clearly show that they don't.
As you have no other defense and can't get past your ignorance, you will just keep blaming us for your own wrongdoings.
TL;DR:
You deserve to die, by your own decision. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9096
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 11:17:00 -
[240] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:You are the best excample that I am right. You cry "I can't do anymore what I want to do". GǪand you can point to an example of this, I presume?
Quote:Again your posts are the best excample "I show them how they have to play this game". WHO are you? Who gave YOU the right to do it? So YOU try to dictate the Miners how they should play! How am I dictating anything? I'm telling them how the game works and how they can make use of the tools available to solve the issues they're having, removing the need to cry endlessly over something that was never a problem to begin with. By the way. I don't gank. So nice ad hominem. Since your entire post rests on this basic fallacy, it's pretty much all wrong. Would you like to try again?
Quote:Someone told you: what you do has not enough risk ... and that's why you are so angry now I know that what I do doesn't have enough risk. That's why I want to see ganking made easier and more common: so my risks increase. I don't know why you're so angry about me wanting to see more risk for meGǪ
You seem to assume that only carebears can mine. If there were no more miners, then the industrialists GÇö the people who do the same thing without the carebear entitlement issues and their incomplete understanding of game fundamentals GÇö will step in and keep the line going. They will not stop producing just because they get ganked GÇö they'll find a way around it (in fact, they probably already have) or include it as a general business expense and keep going. So tell me, why would they not want to mine any more?
Zishy wrote:solo miner = mackinaw group miner = mackinaw>hulk null miner = mackinaw>hulk Lol no. For group mining, Hulk >>>>>>> Mack, because the group lets the Hulk do what the Hulk does best GÇö extract massive amounts of base materials GÇö without being held back by what it doesn't do well. You're also skipping the fourth category: paranoid miner = Skiff > all. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |