Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Thevani Khashour
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:54:00 -
[1501]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: LordElfa
Originally by: Zverofaust
Quote:
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
I was told there was a big obvious yellow message waiting for me later on.
I honestly cannot answer that right now nor should you hear any such answer from me as many have said. As Pann opened this thread, she stated, "I wonÆt be able to answer all of your questions tonight, but I promise weÆll start getting some info out tomorrow."
The reason why I am going through every post and not just skipping to the end unless someone tells me to, is so that I can make sure the nuances of the player responses are condensed, fully represented and then transmitted within CCP to the appropriate people. (Jade Constantine's post is one obvious verbatim one amongst)
Player feedback has diligently been sent from our community and PR team since time immemorial and it is my most solemn and serious duty.
It is more important right now than trying to "solve" things or crusading to answer every single post. That was pretty clear after a short second of introspection following my second or third reply at around page 5.
With all due respect, should we really trust what you're going to tell them? Frankly, if they're not reading this thread, then as far as I'm concerned they don't give a **** and the writing is on the wall, anyway. But, seriously, earlier in this thread you yourself said that as far you could see the main issue was the prices for items on the NeX. And, you're WAY OFF. That's not the main issue at all.
So, my question is, have you seen the fact that the issue weighs about 11 thousand pounds and has to do with selling game advantages to people with real life CASH. If you can't admit that THIS is the main issue, along with several other very valid issues, then what does it matter what you tell them? They'll just blow some more smoke up our butts and call it a day.
We're just concerned consumers.....that's all.
|
JShepard
Caldari The Illuminatii Dirt Nap Squad.
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:54:00 -
[1502]
Dearest CCP, You are reducing the amount of "Shut up and take my money" you shall be receiving from your community. Please remedy this. Non-Vanity microtransactions WILL kill EVE, EVE already possesses a Pay2Win option, it works, we've used it for a long time, we've perhaps even grown to love it. Don't make us break your balls.
|
Catrisane
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:54:00 -
[1503]
Originally by: Kallynda Nai Mother****ing unbelievable
"this is donkey ****" good sumary of Incarna and the ongoing failcascade.
Oh and they need to make CQ something you deliberately choose to enter when you dock, automatically increasing my computers power consumption by 150 watts when I dock can't be eco-friendly
|
Bloodpetal
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:55:00 -
[1504]
Edited by: Bloodpetal on 24/06/2011 04:06:37
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Soundwave will NOT be fired nor should he. I personally would not like to see one of the driving forces behind the Alliance Tournament and the spiritual leader of Team BFF take a fall for agreeing to present one opposing side of the microtransaction debate in an internal newsletter.
You mean the Alliance Tournament we have heard absolutely nothing about on official channels since the finals? The Tournament that had no fan-fare, no pride in the EVE TV Crew? You mean the Alliance Tournament that was embarassed due to the outcome, and has a negative viewpoint from the majority of the viewers who cared? 30,000+ people watching in negative shock.
Also, when I feel I've been personally targeted by his comments because I am in charge and constantly work a thread on the limited fittings nerf - and now he wants to take and make me pay an inconvenience charge after I already give CCP almost $50 a month?
Hmmm... No. I take that personally.
And I'm clearly not the only one that takes offense to KNOWLEDGEABLE and WILLING opposition to what we want in a person we held as an icon for EVE - as you said. So, yes, this is a fall from grace.
Do I want him fired? No, but I'm sure he's not happy about the situation or his reputation. I'm sure that won't positively affect him as an individual. I wonder if he'll hold a grudge against the community for this outcry, and if we'll finally get UNLIMITED fittings again, instead of this disgusting attempt to fleece more money for a basic feature from the "spiritual leader of Team BFF".
____________________________________________________ Cost of the week of June 21st |
Deimos Barret
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:55:00 -
[1505]
I know this has been addressed in one or two posts already, but this thread is already a bit of a TL:DR. SO- This LEAK that hints to CCP making AUR usable to buy items that will give an IN-GAME, MECHANICAL advanage over players: Is it true? I have been playing for 4 years, and have multiple accounts. Many here i know have more and have been here longer, but just the same, if CCP goes this cheap rout, enabling IRL rich kids to gain any MORE of an advantage than PLEX has already given, i will quit this game. This is the ONLY MMO i play and i would hate to see this happen. CCP, YOU NEED TO RETAIN YOUR INTEGRITY. That is one of the CORE reasons you have the fanbase you do here when compared to other MMO makers.
|
Harelip Jenkins
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:55:00 -
[1506]
Originally by: Jade Constantine Hello there Pann, nice to hear from you again. And first off IÆd like to say thank you for being the first one to step in front of the barricades in attempt to speak to the rioting masses of players.
I do think itÆs vitally important that CCP is prepared to listen, because this scandal over microtransactions is probably the most potentially-damaging scandal CCP have ever faced in a fiasco that easily eclipses T20, "Kieron" and ô18 monthsö without breaking sweat. The credibility of the game is at risk here unless we put the doubt and distrust to bed.
To my perspective here are the main issues:
1. CQ being mandatory in its current poorly-optimized state is a terrible development/business decision. It looks like its been pushed onto the user base purely as a microtransaction vanity display case at the cost of usability and function. This is particularly annoying to those players who already support CCP with multiple accounts and is infuriating given the repeated attempts to bug-report and alter CCPÆs decision in this regard during the SISI beta test.
Put simply, itÆs very disappointing that you have removed a functional and much beloved hanger view and replaced it with a resource-intensive CQ mode that does not work efficiency for multiple clients or for lower-spec computers.
Even providing the option not to load the CQ environment with this ugly wallpaper stripped of previous hanger-view functionality is extremely disrespectful to the Eve player base û IÆd like to hear Eve developers admit this was a mistake and commit to restoring the previous hanger view and adding ôdisembark from capsuleö as an optional trigger to launch CQ as soon as possible.
CQ view should not be mandatory and it is simply poor business decision-making to punish sections of the existing user base in the way you have done with this Incarna release. "Expansions" should never mess with existing game-play mechanics whatever the marketing department tell you they want to see.
2. I personally do not like the Aurum concept. I donÆt like the Noble store. I donÆt like Microtransactions in a pay to play subscription-based game. I donÆt like the way that the Eve player base is being robbed of the ability to manufacture avatar clothing for Incarna, I donÆt like the way the sandbox is being messed with, I donÆt like the pricing or corporate message coming out of CCP on the issue, and worse yet, I think it risks turning Incarna into a pointless vanity store writ large. I hear CCP Manifest telling us that ôAurum is here to stayö and I donÆt like the arrogance implied by that statement. It speaks of dogmatic adherence to a pet policy, it speaks of devotion to a business model that doesnÆt belong in Eve, it represents something that works in Free to Play games but isnÆt at all appropriate in a fairly expensive subscription model where a significant number of your players run multiple accounts in long term loyalty to the game world and company.
I honestly think at this stage ditching the Noble store as a bad idea and putting the vanity clothing goods into bpos on the market for players to build and sell would be your best possible way out of this mess at maximum PR gain and goodwill from the community.
3. I am deeply concerned that we are paying CCP employees with our subscription money to develop game content that is not going to be provided to us in reciprocal exchange and will instead be ôdouble-chargedö through microtransactions. This strikes me as simple greed and fleecing your customer base and while it certainly works for ôGorden Geckoö it is not a sustainable model for Eve Online.
You need to impress upon the CCP management that the players of this game are not stupid û we see a Monocle and we know that our subscription money has paid for its development, trying to sell that thing back to us for $70 while failing to deliver engine trails and improved cyno-effect is a slap in the face by any measure.
-cont.
|
Tea Ester Elliot
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:56:00 -
[1507]
Originally by: Deimos Barret I know this has been addressed in one or two posts already, but this thread is already a bit of a TL:DR. SO- This LEAK that hints to CCP making AUR usable to buy items that will give an IN-GAME, MECHANICAL advanage over players: Is it true? I have been playing for 4 years, and have multiple accounts. Many here i know have more and have been here longer, but just the same, if CCP goes this cheap rout, enabling IRL rich kids to gain any MORE of an advantage than PLEX has already given, i will quit this game. This is the ONLY MMO i play and i would hate to see this happen. CCP, YOU NEED TO RETAIN YOUR INTEGRITY. That is one of the CORE reasons you have the fanbase you do here when compared to other MMO makers.
Yes, it is true.
|
Maziy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:56:00 -
[1508]
Edited by: Maziy on 24/06/2011 03:59:03
Originally by: CCP Manifest
I was told there was a big obvious yellow message waiting for me later on.
I honestly cannot answer that right now nor should you hear any such answer from me as many have said. As Pann opened this thread, she stated, "I wonÆt be able to answer all of your questions tonight, but I promise weÆll start getting some info out tomorrow."
The reason why I am going through every post and not just skipping to the end unless someone tells me to, is so that I can make sure the nuances of the player responses are condensed, fully represented and then transmitted within CCP to the appropriate people. (Jade Constantine's post is one obvious verbatim one amongst)
Player feedback has diligently been sent from our community and PR team since time immemorial and it is my most solemn and serious duty.
It is more important right now than trying to "solve" things or crusading to answer every single post. That was pretty clear after a short second of introspection following my second or third reply at around page 5.
Then you cannot help us. Stop reading.
Stop reading, and listen.
Are you moving beyond vanity aur items?
You are of no help at this point if you cannot answer. The entirety of your posts and work done in this thread has been wasted.
Get someone who CAN answer the question, to answer the question.
|
Amitious Turkey
Gallente TarNec
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:56:00 -
[1509]
I am utterly astonished by the responses in this thread...
I for one vote in confidence of CCP, in the hopes that we just misunderstood something. Haunting the forums since '03
Originally by: CCP Navigator We love you all as well <3
Originally by: CCP Navigator We have just updated Dodixie. We care a lot for Gallente.
NAVIGATOR <3 |
Bloodpetal
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:57:00 -
[1510]
Originally by: Myra2007
I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!
I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore! ____________________________________________________ Cost of the week of June 21st |
|
Jonen Case
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:57:00 -
[1511]
Don't have any questions that haven't already been asked, but seriously if you've read this far take 5 minutes and get something stiff to drink.. This thread is HUGE.
|
Indy Rider
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:57:00 -
[1512]
Originally by: Tea Ester Elliot
Yes, it is true.
More on the side of - they refuse / are incapable of denying it, at least Manifest is.
|
Tarago
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:57:00 -
[1513]
I guess there are some things you can tinkle with and some you can't without ruining a good game for me personally if CCP decides to sell skill points I will be finding another game to play
Thanks Tarago
|
Jaroslav Unwanted
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:57:00 -
[1514]
Originally by: Deimos Barret I know this has been addressed in one or two posts already, but this thread is already a bit of a TL:DR. SO- This LEAK that hints to CCP making AUR usable to buy items that will give an IN-GAME, MECHANICAL advanage over players: Is it true? I have been playing for 4 years, and have multiple accounts. Many here i know have more and have been here longer, but just the same, if CCP goes this cheap rout, enabling IRL rich kids to gain any MORE of an advantage than PLEX has already given, i will quit this game. This is the ONLY MMO i play and i would hate to see this happen. CCP, YOU NEED TO RETAIN YOUR INTEGRITY. That is one of the CORE reasons you have the fanbase you do here when compared to other MMO makers.
Document is not fake.. If thats your question.
Yet the meaning and purpose of that document is unknown, except creating forum-wide rage and gathering information about what is what.
|
Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:58:00 -
[1515]
My only regret in all of this is that 2 of my accts are paid up until next February. Can't walk away from the accts I've already paid cash on so I'm stuck for the next 8 months.
I seriously doubt CCP will give me a refund. I wont be happy or satisfied until MT is removed from the game and is NEVER brought back...
I won't bother to ask CCP to promise though because we ALL know now that they are unwilling to keep promises made.
Thats all I need to say about the situation
|
Bob the'Cyno
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:58:00 -
[1516]
Why did they even bother to have CCP folks talking if they don't have to say anything
|
sartorii
Genco
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:58:00 -
[1517]
This toon turned 7 yesterday. I once had 7 active accounts. Down to 2 now, and I barely log into those because CCP doesnt address core gameplay issues anymore, they slap gilt on meaningless trivia... with this turn of events I will soon have 0. This is not the Eve I signed up for and there are better uses for my time and money.
CCP, you are going down and spinning fast. Pull out or die.
Originally by: Jade Constantine Sure when you have been playing Eve as long as we have you learn to take the rough with the smooth but you do so with the general feeling that CCP developers understand and ôgetö what makes Eve great û and thatÆs the problem now. This internal newsletter (if real) shows that one of the leading developers does not ôget eveö does not care about eve, and simply sees eve as a cash cow to be milked ferociously to fund other projects. This is about keeping the golden goose of eve subscriptions (on a drip feed if necessary) while chasing and grubbing every little loose cent he can from the player base.
Let me give you a couple of examples of how this can and does (and has already) impacted our enjoyment of this game:
1. The Captains Quarters û itÆs not gameplay its a display cabinet for vanity items. And the price of this display cabinet for you and I is that multi-client performance in stations is now terrible û if you have a bad graphic card itÆs a jerk fest û if you have a decent graphics card itÆs heat-fest. I can run 3-4 clients with CQÆs turned on û I can run it smoothly û but do I want to? Hell no because my Gtx 580 sounds like its melting my motherboard now! So I need to turn off the CQÆs on multiple accounts and as a result have more limited functionality on those accounts and an ugly wallpaper. No more station environment, no more clicking on my ship to open cargo hold, no more dragging ship to the hanger to board it. The delivery of the CQ vanity item display case has impacted my gameplay.
CCP could have made it optional and given us the option of keeping the old hanger view and added a ôdisembark shipö option to the UI but ôoh noö to do that would have meant we werenÆt being forced to look the vanity display case that marketing insisted must be front and centre if weÆre to even think about buying these ridiculously overpriced items from the Noble store.
2. If you read the newsletter youÆll see reference to saved fitting slots û and I donÆt know about you Verone but in JF weÆve run out of saved corp ship fittings. We want CCP to up the limit but is that really going to happen while the ôbiz-devsö talk honeyed words about how to squeeze extra income from players for such ôminor upgrades.ö? How long till we pay aurum for extra corp standing slots? For wardec options? For a usable corp management screen?
3. And who develops these vanity items? Yes thats right its Eve artists and developers whose salary we pay with our subscriptions. Given the choice wouldnÆt you rather have engine trails and flashy cyno effect for all players rather than a bunch of overpriced tat in the Aur store for a fleeced few?
Because that is precisely the compromise being made here -> CCP using our subs money to pay for vanity item production they want to sell back to us for greedy prices and it is something you SHOULD get mad about.
"disconnect and self destruct one mullet at at time" [sic] |
Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:58:00 -
[1518]
Originally by: Iamien Let us talk with John Turbefield (CCP Diagoras). He is the only CCP Employee that most of us have any respect for at the moment.
What if CCP Diagoras is the guy most in favour of "Ammo Now", CCP Soundwave is the most opposed to PLEX or any form of MT, and they took opposing stances in order to ensure a balanced debate?
Where would you lot be when it turns out the guy you thought was Robert Paulson was actually Tyler Durden? [ Australian players join channel ANZAC ] |
Bloodpetal
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:59:00 -
[1519]
Originally by: Amitious Turkey I am utterly astonished by the responses in this thread...
I for one vote in confidence of CCP, in the hopes that we just misunderstood something.
Lol, denial.
Quote: Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence.
The subject may use: simple denial - deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether minimisation - admit the fact but deny its seriousness (a combination of denial and rationalization) projection - admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility.
____________________________________________________ Cost of the week of June 21st |
Valek Noor
Amarr Eternal Phoenix Rises The Jagged Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:59:00 -
[1520]
posting in an epic thread cause ccp needs to know how wrong this is.
doubt my voice will count for much but i have to add it.
i am not a golfer.
I am an eve player,i have two accounts with eve and have since 2005.
My beloved eve is on the verge of failing because this is by far the biggest mistake you have made as a company.
you have to re think this. MT is not for eve, you broke the moulds with gameplay and ideas why the hell you following other people?
eve is no farmville or wow, make dust this way if you must but not eve, not our beloved eve that we have all worked so hard to make great together
the sandbox must live dont kill it
There is no right or wrong, only consequences |
|
Diomedes Calypso
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:00:00 -
[1521]
Originally by: Che Jin Right about now some CCP accountant is crunching numbers and seeing if subs are crashing from rage quit. I'd be willing to bet there is someone up there saying "This is merely a minor dip in the greater pattern of profits. We're going to have to break a few eggs to make a great cake. Let's wait them out and eventually Pavlovian theory will bring them back crawling... and then we can charge them an additional re-subscription fee on top of the normal subscription."
Then another egghead steps up and says "True. In addition, we can ensure robust profits and recovered dividends by charging an additional inactive character storage and maintenance fee for allowing non-subscribed players to retain their accounts intact".
Silence from these kinds of guys is never good. It means they got caught doing something wrong and they've learned how to be a little bit more sneaky about their next round of buttsehks.
Core "mavens" that attract dozens for each one of them will have paid months in advance and have piles of isk to keep their accounts active forever.
When the "mavens" stop logging in though, even with a current account, retention and attraction will wane months later.
Of course if new mavens are attracted and existing ones come back from sebaticals at other games.. nothing will happen.
Tldr.. even if it were a catastrophe you wouldn't see an immediate drop.. the general solider type doesn't really read teh forums and wouldnt get the allusions the ceo made.
|
Zleon Leigh
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:00:00 -
[1522]
Holding off paying next installment until this shakes out.
Points of anger: 1) Poor quality releases. Clearly untested code/Player found problems ignored (completely waste your customer's donated time, good call) 2) Ridiculous CQ release - with amazing flaws and drawbacks - with features specifically declined by the customer base long before release 3) MT poorly implemented and released at the crayon level 4) Astounding mistreatment and disrespect of customer base 5) Internal corporate culture that holds abusing the customer an achievement (is there any possible way that this couldn't have been seen as an oncoming train wreck? Sales staff has to be flinging themselves into oblivion) 6) No commitment to properly finishing anything 7) Hands off upper management - apparently doesn't understand the word "customer", but has "Greed" down pat 8) Deliberate changes to drive EVE economy into the dirt 9) Actively promoting and abetting in game harrassment
|
Rocinantae
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:00:00 -
[1523]
Im not going to go into why im upset. Jade Constantines post sums up my feelings. What I want to do is let you know youve not just ****ed off the usual suspects.
Im one of those players that had some faith in CCP. I would always tell the new guys that Eve is just as much a sandbox to the devs as it is to us since there is no other game like it. Eve is a long term game I would say. If you get bored go take a break, your characters will be training. Im in one of those breaks now. I un-subbed for the summer and was going to be back in a few months. If the CQ is not an option and something is not done to satisfy me about the fearless letter I wont.
So basically you have not only stirred up those that would be ****ed anyway. You have a lot of us that were just happy to be along for the ride ready to jump ship.
|
Salpun
Gallente Paramount Commerce
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:01:00 -
[1524]
All these issues come down to effert. In Eve effert equals time. You are trying to take the time part out of the CQ side of the experince(at least you have not shown how you are going to include it.) CQ could be a huge isk source how are you going to create sinks for those that only play WIS buying pants and shoes cannot be be primary sink.
Mixing Dust/WS/Ships is a good goal but the conversion of $/time needs to be maintained. With pay to play a real part of the game how do you keep balance.
If you had a full game it would not be a problem but you do not. We are working on it will not cut it. The issue is here and now.
While there are many people not reading the forums and just playing alot of people are doing both and they are watching.
Good luck CCP
|
Jhagiti Tyran
Muppet Ninja's Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:02:00 -
[1525]
Originally by: Jade Constantine Sure when you have been playing Eve as long as we have you learn to take the rough with the smooth but you do so with the general feeling that CCP developers understand and ôgetö what makes Eve great û and thatÆs the problem now. This internal newsletter (if real) shows that one of the leading developers does not ôget eveö does not care about eve, and simply sees eve as a cash cow to be milked ferociously to fund other projects. This is about keeping the golden goose of eve subscriptions (on a drip feed if necessary) while chasing and grubbing every little loose cent he can from the player base.
Let me give you a couple of examples of how this can and does (and has already) impacted our enjoyment of this game:
1. The Captains Quarters û itÆs not gameplay its a display cabinet for vanity items. And the price of this display cabinet for you and I is that multi-client performance in stations is now terrible û if you have a bad graphic card itÆs a jerk fest û if you have a decent graphics card itÆs heat-fest. I can run 3-4 clients with CQÆs turned on û I can run it smoothly û but do I want to? Hell no because my Gtx 580 sounds like its melting my motherboard now! So I need to turn off the CQÆs on multiple accounts and as a result have more limited functionality on those accounts and an ugly wallpaper. No more station environment, no more clicking on my ship to open cargo hold, no more dragging ship to the hanger to board it. The delivery of the CQ vanity item display case has impacted my gameplay.
CCP could have made it optional and given us the option of keeping the old hanger view and added a ôdisembark shipö option to the UI but ôoh noö to do that would have meant we werenÆt being forced to look the vanity display case that marketing insisted must be front and centre if weÆre to even think about buying these ridiculously overpriced items from the Noble store.
2. If you read the newsletter youÆll see reference to saved fitting slots û and I donÆt know about you Verone but in JF weÆve run out of saved corp ship fittings. We want CCP to up the limit but is that really going to happen while the ôbiz-devsö talk honeyed words about how to squeeze extra income from players for such ôminor upgrades.ö? How long till we pay aurum for extra corp standing slots? For wardec options? For a usable corp management screen?
3. And who develops these vanity items? Yes thats right its Eve artists and developers whose salary we pay with our subscriptions. Given the choice wouldnÆt you rather have engine trails and flashy cyno effect for all players rather than a bunch of overpriced tat in the Aur store for a fleeced few?
Because that is precisely the compromise being made here -> CCP using our subs money to pay for vanity item production they want to sell back to us for greedy prices and it is something you SHOULD get mad about.
So hereÆs the thing.
The time to fight for the game we love is not in six months time when these concepts have bedded down and CCP is feeling bold enough to start selling Noble Faction ammo and +9 implants. The time to fight is now. Because this newsletter embodies everything that many of us feared but didnÆt want to believe CCP were becoming capable of. It is a massive betrayal of the compact we shared as players and developers of this game and indicates that CCP is preparing to leap down a very dark and deep path of self-immolation in the months to come.
I donÆt want to see Eve Online die Verone. That sounds dramatic I know, but gameworlds die when the dreams and visions are extinguished and that can happen through a succession of bad ideas foisted on a community by people who really donÆt have much of a clue in business.
This.
Personally I just unsubbed two accounts that have been active constantly since 2007. I do not pay 30 Euros a month to look at a low res brown door.
|
Bloodpetal
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:02:00 -
[1526]
Originally by: Mara Rinn
Originally by: Iamien Let us talk with John Turbefield (CCP Diagoras). He is the only CCP Employee that most of us have any respect for at the moment.
What if CCP Diagoras is the guy most in favour of "Ammo Now", CCP Soundwave is the most opposed to PLEX or any form of MT, and they took opposing stances in order to ensure a balanced debate?
Where would you lot be when it turns out the guy you thought was Robert Paulson was actually Tyler Durden?
League of Legends, Manga.
Nuff said.
____________________________________________________ Cost of the week of June 21st |
Che Jin
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:02:00 -
[1527]
Edited by: Che Jin on 24/06/2011 04:03:06
Originally by: Amitious Turkey I am utterly astonished by the responses in this thread...
I for one vote in confidence of CCP, in the hopes that we just misunderstood something.
|
Starlight Twilight
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:03:00 -
[1528]
what the **** is going on? is CCP even owned by CCP anymore? did EA secretly take over? are we going to get mounts and pets we have to pay for to parade around in our room the size of a cubicle? what next? people becoming death knights and go take on the lich king? O o /»________________________ | LAAZZZAAARRRRRRZZZZ!!!!!!!!! \_»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» |
IVeige
Caldari IVever.
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:03:00 -
[1529]
Originally by: Catrisane
Originally by: Kallynda Nai Mother****ing unbelievable
"this is donkey ****" good sumary of Incarna and the ongoing failcascade.
Oh and they need to make CQ something you deliberately choose to enter when you dock, automatically increasing my computers power consumption by 150 watts when I dock can't be eco-friendly
Awesome video
|
Col Howitzer
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 04:03:00 -
[1530]
I speak for myself here but I would PAY $20 /month for a sub fee if MT goes bye bye forever and changes happen in communication with playerbase and fix some issues Only CCP can prevent forum fires |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |