Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Becka Goldbeck
18
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:01:00 -
[91] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I can't wait for Bounties to be implementable on everyone......
Put a 50m bounty on an exhumer pilot, and it'll be plenty profitable enough to suicide gank them....
Oh, so we can just go around placing arbitrary bounties on everyone for free?
Neat. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
771
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:02:00 -
[92] - Quote
Becka Goldbeck wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I can't wait for Bounties to be implementable on everyone......
Put a 50m bounty on an exhumer pilot, and it'll be plenty profitable enough to suicide gank them....
Oh, so we can just go around placing arbitrary bounties on everyone for free? Neat. tbh most exhumer pilots deserve it. Nothing Found |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
1954
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:11:00 -
[93] - Quote
all building up to the CFC mass ice mining cta |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:baltec1 wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote: This.
After all the whinage and crying that suiciding miners is no longer profitable I find it hard to believe that miners are being suicided to increase... profits.
Whoever said anythng about making a profit? A profit might be possible. Consider this: gank every miner except your own, be the only one mining the resource. Profit? So it might have been lucrative to just gank the miners and have a stockpile of the targeted resource already at hand, and then sell it at a higher price. The cost of ganking now might offset that, but the hull buff may have now required that the gankers harvest the resources themselves. This is my theory or assumption. They might just be trying to see if it's possible. Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1628
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:32:00 -
[95] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote: Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you.
Not sure if you're trolling or not, just because you mine your own minerals doesn't make them free, they're worth as much as someone is willing to pay for them. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Selinate
1041
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:48:00 -
[96] - Quote
Whether you're correct or not, the price in Jita is moving up at a noticeable rate.
I'll take the bet on you, OP. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1447
|
Posted - 2012.10.15 23:53:00 -
[97] - Quote
Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist, but I thought this was just a game.
Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.
I love this!
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:40:00 -
[98] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you.
Not sure if you're trolling or not, just because you mine your own minerals doesn't make them free, they're worth as much as someone is willing to pay for them. I'll argue this till the cows come home. There is no REAL cost to aquisition in a VR environment except time. Only a-retents pouring over little squares in a maths app think there is.
If you intend to calculate time in the aquisition then there are far more profitable ways to make isk and I've hammered this home a million times.
Gankers need to gank for fun and stop using any economic argument to justify it. Period.
PS: Besides, you're talking about mineral value at sale. Nothing actually has value until it is for sale. File that one in your economics folder under R for reality.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1629
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost
The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them.
Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:44:00 -
[100] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist seven times, but I thought this was just a game.
Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.
I love this! Seriously, they called you a *&^%$# coward because you flew away in your MINING VESSEL as they came to hit you with 9, read NINE battlecruisers?
YOU'RE a coward?
ROFLMAO... I'm laughing so hard I'm crying.... I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
780
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:48:00 -
[101] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: Ofc, the simplest solution to make ganking exhumers profitable. Mine the resources and MAKE the gankmobile. Cost = 0
Pssst.....Don't forget to tank those exhumers tho', there's bad men out there who want to touch you.
Not sure if you're trolling or not, just because you mine your own minerals doesn't make them free, they're worth as much as someone is willing to pay for them. I'll argue this till the cows come home. There is no REAL cost to aquisition in a VR environment except time. Only a-retents pouring over little squares in a maths app think there is. If you intend to calculate time in the aquisition then there are far more profitable ways to make isk and I've hammered this home a million times. Gankers need to gank for fun and stop using any economic argument to justify it. Period. PS: Besides, you're talking about mineral value at sale. Nothing actually has value until it is for sale. File that one in your economics folder under R for reality.
Bolded part not true.
That is where theft and stealing come into play. You don't have it for sale, too bad, someone steals it since they know it still has value. Doesn't matter if its for sale or not. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:50:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them. Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I.
And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR.
Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all.
>>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them"
Exactly what I'm saying.
Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever.
I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1448
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:56:00 -
[103] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist seven times, but I thought this was just a game.
Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.
I love this! Seriously, they called you a *&^%$# coward because you flew away in your MINING VESSEL as they came to hit you with 9, read NINE battlecruisers? YOU'RE a coward? ROFLMAO... I'm laughing so hard I'm crying.... Well, it is no real surprise. Most of these null gankers are pimply faced preteens trying to be relevant on the internet. So when they don't get their way, acting like a big tough guy on the internet is all they have. Last time I checked tough guys don't cry, so these gankers need to do a bit more research on what it takes to be one.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Selinate
1041
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:57:00 -
[104] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them. Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I. And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR. Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all. >>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them" Exactly what I'm saying. Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever. Ganking shouldn't be done for the profit?
Oh, I think the last freighter the goons popped would beg to differ... |

captain foivos
State War Academy Caldari State
127
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 00:59:00 -
[105] - Quote
Man, Marlona is still really mad about being banned from kugu by Mittens. |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:11:00 -
[106] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I shall refer you to the phenomenon known as opportunity cost The value of the minerals you mine is not only determined by how much someone is willing to pay for them but by what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them. Tippia or Akita_T can explain it a lot better than I can If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I. And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR. Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all. >>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them" Exactly what I'm saying. Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever. Ganking shouldn't be done for the profit? Oh, I think the last freighter the goons popped would beg to differ... Didn't say it CAN'T be, I said it SHOULDN'T be.
Besides the argument was whether time mining to MAKE a gankmobile can be considered as a "cost" to improve the profitability of the gank.
If profit was the pure motivation then there are much better ways to make the time used in Eve more profitable.
Why bother ganking for profit? I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1629
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:11:00 -
[107] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote: If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I.
And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR.
Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all.
>>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them"
Exactly what I'm saying.
Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever.
A job you say? $45 an hour you say? There's these things called economies, with few exceptions they're not in a good state globally. Where I live there are 1500 people going for every job that comes up, and believe me none of them are paying $45 an hour.
In real money terms (to me) $45 an hour is -ú28 an hour, I know very few people who earn even close to that.
I'm a specialist auto electrician by trade, I specialised in fitting optional entertainment systems into cars high end vehicles such as Bentley & Rolls Royce, as well as aftermarket electronics into cars that the average consumer can't fit their own stuff into because of technologies such as CANBUS and MOST, that trade is dead, nobody has the money anymore to purchase the stuff let alone pay for it to be fitted, long gone are the days when people would spend -ú10k on vehicle enhancements. I'm looking for a permanent job, I have paid good money to train new skills, the jobs that are out there have more applicants than they know what to do with. I'm currently doing casual work on building sites to keep a roof over my head and food in my belly, and that work is drying up.
Now talk to me about real life economics. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1448
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:38:00 -
[108] - Quote
captain foivos wrote:Man, Marlona is still really mad about being banned from kugu by Mittens. I see you're having to resort to an alt and trying to change the subject. I suggest you start a new thread.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
372
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:45:00 -
[109] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Touval Lysander wrote: If they were to apply RL economics, ofc they can. So too could I.
And if I were to do so, I'd tell you to get a job, earn $45 in an hour, buy yourself 3 plex and make 1.8b IN ONE HOUR.
Any RL economic argument that wants to play "VR time as a cost" needs to include an RL equivalent which completely squashes ANY need to even play for isk at all.
>>>>> "what else you could have been doing in the time it takes to mine them"
Exactly what I'm saying.
Ganking should NOT be done nor can it be argued as requiring profit as the motivation. There is no need. Ever.
A job you say? $45 an hour you say? There's these things called economies, with few exceptions they're not in a good state globally. Where I live there are 1500 people going for every job that comes up, and believe me none of them are paying $45 an hour. In real money terms (to me) $45 an hour is -ú28 an hour, I know very few people who earn even close to that. I'm a specialist auto electrician by trade, I specialised in fitting optional entertainment systems into high end vehicles such as Bentley & Rolls Royce, as well as aftermarket electronics into cars that the average consumer can't fit their own stuff into because of technologies such as CANBUS and MOST, that trade is dead, nobody has the money anymore to purchase the stuff let alone pay for it to be fitted, long gone are the days when people would spend -ú10k on vehicle enhancements. I'm looking for a permanent job, I have paid good money to train new skills, the jobs that are out there have more applicants than they know what to do with. I'm currently doing casual work on building sites to keep a roof over my head and food in my belly, and that work is drying up. Now talk to me about real life economics. That's a sad situation, particualrly for a tradee. I'm on $80+/hr (AU) and I'm sem-retired so I s'pose I just picked the right profession.
But regardless, unless you're RMT, nothing in Eve will change what happens in RL in a meaningful way so it's a moot point.
The converse is true though - what you do in RL CAN effect what you do in Eve. Where we intend to cojoin RL and VR economic theories we need to be cognizant of that fact and adjust our arguments accordingly to include BOTH as a possible source of income.
The fact is, once done like that, NOTHING in Eve comes close to ISK conversion as does RL >> VR.
TLDR: People are happy to include RL theory behind many arguments (including me) but are happy to discard it just as readily when it suits too. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1629
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:48:00 -
[110] - Quote
You're lucky then, Australia is one of the few countries that isn't suffering in the current economic climate. If I could amass the points required to emigrate I would. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
361
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 01:52:00 -
[111] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:ICE procuror fits can AFK for about 30 minutes & have ~5X the eHP... will be interesting if they start popping up or if cheap retiervers replace the MACs in the ice fields
Why do you yell every time you say "ice?" Or has that word been backronym'ed in the EVE context whilst I was away? Stealth Bomber bombs and covert-bridging in hisec naow, please: It's the only way to make sure! |

baltec1
Bat Country
2482
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 04:09:00 -
[112] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote: Just pointing out. They still dont tank their ships.
What I heard, they don't need to. CCP did it for them. You heard or read Baltec Zim and Darth too? But seems they can still gank ships. It's good news for them, bad for idiots.
We are teaching bad miners the difference between not profitable to gank and ungankable. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1630
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 04:43:00 -
[113] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote: Just pointing out. They still dont tank their ships.
What I heard, they don't need to. CCP did it for them. You heard or read Baltec Zim and Darth too? But seems they can still gank ships. It's good news for them, bad for idiots. We are teaching bad miners the difference between not profitable to gank and ungankable.
You're a charity , teaching people how to mine responsibly without profiting from the lessons.
Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 04:57:00 -
[114] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Go to belt, launch drones, turn on ice harvester and go do something else. 116,662 EHP. For added fun toss in Tengu shield bonuses to bring that up to 157,352 EHP. Welcome to AFK PvP. Sure you won't be getting that amazing ice yield, but instead you will bask in the glory of ganker tears and after all, can you really put a price on those? 
PLEASE do this, and tell me what system you are in. Please oh please oh please.
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Thanks.
The gankers always say we are 'stupid' for not tanking 100%.
For me, it's RISK vs REWARD. Not stupidity.
And I will almost always fit for max yield.
...and not been blown up while mining in over 1yr, 8 months.
Those miners who do get exploded are AFK, period.
I keep seeing you login and off on krixtal and your alts. I've been too lazy to react. I guess I need to do something about that.
Marlona Sky wrote:Saw nine tornados on scan, aligned out. When they landed I warped off. Was immediately called a "f****** f**** coward!" in local. Please explain the amount of extreme rage these gankers have? Why are they so mad? Might be due to a couple of them smashing their face into my brick tanks fist seven times, but I thought this was just a game.
Saving the logs for now to milk them a bit longer before reporting the two highly upset gankers for their unkind words. Also having fun using a Kitsune with Gallente jammers to jam all these Catalysts the moment they go flashy.
I love this!
That wasn't my group, if you tell me who it was , i have a falcon on deck. |

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
374
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:02:00 -
[115] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:baltec1 wrote: Just pointing out. They still dont tank their ships.
What I heard, they don't need to. CCP did it for them. You heard or read Baltec Zim and Darth too? But seems they can still gank ships. It's good news for them, bad for idiots. We are teaching bad miners the difference between not profitable to gank and ungankable. You could, you know, just send 'em an email. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Touval Lysander
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
374
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:05:00 -
[116] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
If you want to fit for max yield, then you risk getting suicide ganked... The choice is yours... and CCP should not hold your hand and protect you anymore than they already have!!!
Thanks. The gankers always say we are 'stupid' for not tanking 100%. For me, it's RISK vs REWARD. Not stupidity. And I will almost always fit for max yield. ...and not been blown up while mining in over 1yr, 8 months. Those miners who do get exploded are AFK, period. Now where did I see you last?
Oh, around Orva and Thiarer, that's right, the Derelik region. Can't recall you mining in the lowsec territories around there though.
Might go take a look with my cynnie or.... tornado.
Wave won't you. I lost countless ships and millions of isk on gank attempts. I did not blame CCP, Concord or the miner. I blamed me for bothering. I made more money.......... mining.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1630
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:07:00 -
[117] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote: You could, you know, just send 'em an email.
LOL where's the fun in that? Nothing says hello like a tier 3 BC to the face 
Apologies for my little rant earlier BTW, I went off the rails a bit there. Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Herr Hammer Draken
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
136
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:36:00 -
[118] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:
If true here comes the Procuror multi boxers to GALL space that'll makethe 20 box retriever fleets look like sharks in a school of sardines
English translation, people will afk mine ice in multiboxed Procurors. The truth is that even if they did, they wouldn't fit tanks, they would fit for yield/cargo and would die to a suicide gank, not to mention that the ore hold is too small to make it really viable. 36 minutes for 12 blocks of ice is a sizeable amount of time invested for the return even in a cheap barge like a Procuror.
And in the end of it all, after all the whining by both sides gankers and miners alike, we have the truth come out. Ganks will always happen in high sec. Tank does not matter, profit does not matter, ganks will continue. This is the ultimate truth. So tank your miner or not, it realy makes no difference if they want you gone gone you will be. Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
780
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:38:00 -
[119] - Quote
^ You should play some dramatic music, the next time you post that. I will not be voting in the CSM election, so you need to go vote to make up for me. |

Taiwanistan
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
275
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 05:48:00 -
[120] - Quote
How do I mine ice without any mining skills trained? TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |