| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sentamon
193
|
Posted - 2012.10.25 23:54:00 -
[331] - Quote
AzAkiR NaLDa wrote:It is and always will remain a sandbox game. And in the sandbox there are always people who can't take it when someone throws sand at them. Bumping is part of the game. It is the exact same with can flipping and stuff like that. Don't want to get bumped in highsec? Don't afk mine or go to nullsec where afk miners are slaughtered for being afk. Or you could try to live with it. 
Couple of things here.
* Can flipping flags you. Bumping does not. * Nullsec miners dock as soon as an unfriendly enters their system, and if they are AFK "magic" does it for them. The only slaughter in nullsec is the slaughter of your braincells from the lack of risk. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

bufnitza calatoare
Snap Crackle Pop. Relativity Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 00:10:00 -
[332] - Quote
hmmm only just noticed this thread.
I have been told off by gm's for bumping orca's and hulks in my nano mach.
it is considered to be harassment if you bump anyone for absolutely not reason.
yet gms also say its fine to bump someone if faction popo is onto them.
double standards if you ask me..
I know tell gm's where to go on bumping issues. |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 00:33:00 -
[333] - Quote
bufnitza calatoare wrote:it is considered to be harassment if you bump anyone for absolutely not reason.
It is. But spreading the New Order and selling mining permits is a reason (and a very good one, if you ask me), so if you do that, bumping is not harassment
It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Heimdallofasgard
Apex Overplayed Coalition Fatal Ascension
273
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 00:47:00 -
[334] - Quote
Bump Kick Heim... MATE |

Smohq Anmirorz
State War Academy Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 01:01:00 -
[335] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Tali Ambraelle wrote:Orbit with an MWD Yes please do this. It turns bumping in to a zero effort activity.
Yeah, I've done this with a skiff. The bumper has a lot more trouble keeping you out of range. They move on to easier targets, like an Orca and a bunch of barges/exhumers all sitting in one place.
Additionally, the effort of the bumpers is not that organized, anyway. In most systems if you see bumpers, they usually get bored and leave rather quickly. If they're not doing that in your system, find another system. They're not everywhere. |

crab nicholson extreme
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 01:51:00 -
[336] - Quote
ok if they were to do that then i would either fit a skiff for pvp with drones in high sec by parking outside a station so people would bump me or a pirate would bump me so my drones freak out on him giving him kill rights on me then him ganking me GREAT PLAN |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:12:00 -
[337] - Quote
WOW, I can't belive this thread took off like this.
Was just looking for some CCP input that they would consider looking into letting the bumpee fight back without getting his/her arms chopped off by Concord similar to the effects of can flipping. I am NOT suggesting any nerfs, buffs, bans, etc., just the ability to hit back.
Obviously the bumpers do not want this because they will lose their protection.
As a miner found out the hard way, Concord protects all bumpers.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14763810
This is what I am against. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:19:00 -
[338] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:WOW, I can't belive this thread took off like this. Was just looking for some CCP input that they would consider looking into letting the bumpee fight back without getting his/her arms chopped off by Concord similar to the effects of can flipping. I am NOT suggesting any nerfs, buffs, bans, etc., just the ability to hit back. Obviously the bumpers do not want this because they will lose their protection. As a miner found out the hard way, Concord protects all bumpers. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14763810This is what I am against. They listened.
On december 4th you'll be able to put a bounty on the bumpers. Problem solved.
Just don't cry about me putting a bounty on you so that james can blow you up instead of bumping you.
You guys should have been careful what you wished for.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1615
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:20:00 -
[339] - Quote
Phoenix Bibbs wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Tesal wrote:Bumpers live for threads like this. Tears, tears and more tears. Haha. Well they have been well nourished, then. Please stop!! You're ruining my diet. I would also like to take this opportunity to reaffirm my commitment to the New Order of High Sec and James 315. This thread alone has paid back the investment I made into the Order and as a shareholder I couldn't be happier. Good return on the investment, eh.
That's great. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:25:00 -
[340] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Zkaor wrote:WOW, I can't belive this thread took off like this. Was just looking for some CCP input that they would consider looking into letting the bumpee fight back without getting his/her arms chopped off by Concord similar to the effects of can flipping. I am NOT suggesting any nerfs, buffs, bans, etc., just the ability to hit back. Obviously the bumpers do not want this because they will lose their protection. As a miner found out the hard way, Concord protects all bumpers. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14763810This is what I am against. They listened. On december 4th you'll be able to put a bounty on the bumpers. Problem solved. Just don't cry about me putting a bounty on you so that james can blow you up instead of bumping you. You guys should have been careful what you wished for.
Bounties do not allow bumpees to respond
quoted from a dev blog "Bounties have no effect on who can be attacked legally where"
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73446
unless i understand it correctly. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:26:00 -
[341] - Quote
which is quite possible |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
385
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:32:00 -
[342] - Quote
You undrestand incorrectly.
"attacked legally where" should only mean that I can't put a bounty on you and then be able to legally attack you. The person that places the bounty doesn't get a free pass to attack someone anywhere legally.
I put bounty on you, you're still not legal to me, but you're legal to everyone else.
They chose a vague way to say you can't use it to generate legal kills for yourself. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:43:00 -
[343] - Quote
Possibly, but we'll see soon enough.
I would figure you for sure would want to allow bumpees being able to fight back. I would assume that alot, like myself, would probably lose their ill fitted ship to more experienced pvp players. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:44:00 -
[344] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:You undrestand incorrectly. "attacked legally where" should only mean that I can't put a bounty on you and then be able to legally attack you. The person that places the bounty doesn't get a free pass to attack someone anywhere legally. I put bounty on you, you're still not legal to me, but you're legal to everyone else. They chose a vague way to say you can't use it to generate legal kills for yourself. PS: But maybe I'm wrong. They don't say anywhere that bounties can't be collected anywhere, and they made it so that blowing up the ship counts towards bounties. I'm assuming that they aren't restricting it to low and null or just null; that would be pointless and wouldn't actually make this bounty system anymore useful than the current one.
agreed |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
386
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:48:00 -
[345] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:Possibly, but we'll see soon enough.
I would figure you for sure would want to allow bumpees being able to fight back. I would assume that alot, like myself, would probably lose their ill fitted ship to more experienced pvp players.
I do indeed.
Retribution is all about high sec fighting back, kind of the theme of the entire xpac. If you can't place a bounty on someone in high sec and other people shoot them in high sec to collect the bounty, than it's not really allowing people in high sec to fight back. It's just making an already useless and unused feature, a changed but still useless feature.
People aren't going to fly into null sec to shoot someone for a small portion of a 500m bounty. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:53:00 -
[346] - Quote
So why not (not tech savy here) let something be set up similar to can flippers ? The agressor, bumper, gets flagged and the bumpee has the choice to do nothing or fight back without being Concorded. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 02:56:00 -
[347] - Quote
Along the lines of what they will call a "LE"
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73443
3rd para from bottom |

Willy Bryan
Spanked and Straddled
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:05:00 -
[348] - Quote
Ever notice that even for such a large MMORPG, most people assume that they are the only one who matters in the game? I always get a laugh reading the blogs and local after a good bump fleet. "you're breaking my rights as a high-sec miner" stories tend to be my favorite. I remember back when can-flipping really got popular. Mission runners around major hubs used to cry over that. Granted, some things about flipping have been changed and tweeked, but it is still possible, and with the new changes, is going to invite all the pvp we wished we got before. The same thing applies about miners crying about bumping now. The only reason you guys are upset is because you haven't figured out a solution that you're actually willing to do to avoid being bumped. Now I also saw earlier somebody mentioning that AFK mining is their right. I'll agree, it is your right, but it is also MY right to move you away from that ice that you thought you were going to be shooting at for the next hour without checking. Remember the story from a few months back about the guy who was parking gila's in a static plex site's rooms and letting his drones kill npc's all day? He ended up making a killing doing that over a prolonged period of time, but it was considered an exploit due to him not having to have any interation with the game for hours at a time. If he wasn't allowed to make his isk AFK, what gives miners any more right? Bumping is fine as is, it affords the opportunity for individuals like James315 and myself to even the odds and make you, the afk miner, actually play the game for once.
The New Order of Highsec supporter, enforcer, and shareholder. |

Willy Bryan
Spanked and Straddled
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:12:00 -
[349] - Quote
Oh, and since I forgot to address it in my other post, the idea of giving an aggro flag for bumping another player is just excess baggage on the server. Have any of you that are suggesting this ever undocked from a station, fleet-warped anywhere, or had to form a 'ball' for logi support? Obviously not, or you'd know the nightmare this would cause. I.E: I'm running incurions in high sec with an incursion fleet in a HQ. There are 40 people in this fleet of all differect corporations. Each ship is around 4 bil. After heading to a few sites, we've all bumped into each other multiple times, and by your proposal we should all be allowed to shoot at each other by this point. See the issue?
If you really want to know the secrets to anti-bumping, I'll tell you; make an alt and join in on the fun, or pay up and enjoy your bump free mining. It is really that simple.
If neither one of these things are your style, convo me, and I'll teach you the ancient arts passed down from the bittervets themselves for one-time fee of 100mil. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:13:00 -
[350] - Quote
Willy Bryan wrote:Ever notice that even for such a large MMORPG, most people assume that they are the only one who matters in the game? I always get a laugh reading the blogs and local after a good bump fleet. "you're breaking my rights as a high-sec miner" stories tend to be my favorite. I remember back when can-flipping really got popular. Mission runners around major hubs used to cry over that. Granted, some things about flipping have been changed and tweeked, but it is still possible, and with the new changes, is going to invite all the pvp we wished we got before. The same thing applies about miners crying about bumping now. The only reason you guys are upset is because you haven't figured out a solution that you're actually willing to do to avoid being bumped. Now I also saw earlier somebody mentioning that AFK mining is their right. I'll agree, it is your right, but it is also MY right to move you away from that ice that you thought you were going to be shooting at for the next hour without checking. Remember the story from a few months back about the guy who was parking gila's in a static plex site's rooms and letting his drones kill npc's all day? He ended up making a killing doing that over a prolonged period of time, but it was considered an exploit due to him not having to have any interation with the game for hours at a time. If he wasn't allowed to make his isk AFK, what gives miners any more right? Bumping is fine as is, it affords the opportunity for individuals like James315 and myself to even the odds and make you, the afk miner, actually play the game for once.
The New Order of Highsec supporter, enforcer, and shareholder.
Have u actually read any of my posts ?
How can I fight back if I am AFK ? Bump away, just allow me to fight u without Concord cutting me down. |

Luc Chastot
Moira. Villore Accords
43
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:16:00 -
[351] - Quote
With all the isk you make from afk mining, you could easily fund a mercenary corp that will wardec and hunt the bumpers. James 514 and his minions are silly, but I think you people deserve what they do. Use your brain. Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:18:00 -
[352] - Quote
Luc Chastot wrote:With all the isk you make from afk mining, you could easily fund a mercenary corp that will wardec and hunt the bumpers. James 514 and his minions are silly, but I think you people deserve what they do. Use your brain.
You accuse me of somthing I did not do ... AFK mining. |

Skydell
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
322
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:21:00 -
[353] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:
Have u actually read any of my posts ?
How can I fight back if I am AFK ? Bump away, just allow me to fight u without Concord cutting me down.
That makes me wonder why there was never a mechanic put in to place that allowed people to duel in HS. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:22:00 -
[354] - Quote
Besides, why should I pay someone to do the fighting I WANT to do when someone bumps me? |

Willy Bryan
Spanked and Straddled
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:25:00 -
[355] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:Willy Bryan wrote:Ever notice that even for such ........ the afk miner, actually play the game for once.
The New Order of Highsec supporter, enforcer, and shareholder. Have u actually read any of my posts ? How can I fight back if I am AFK ? Bump away, just allow me to fight u without Concord cutting me down.
There are plenty of ways to fight back, if you haven't figured them out yet, then that's your own fault. It's really easy to protect yourself from bumpers, or to get back at us if you really wanted to. |

Lone Hitman
The Praxis Initiative Gentlemen's Agreement
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:25:00 -
[356] - Quote
Allow mining barges and capital ships to anchor themselves, with the caveat that the ship and pilot remain in space until it is unanchored. Do not allow capital ships to jump while anchored; this would prevent accidental titan jumps and bumping of titans. |

Zkaor
HATRON 4
2
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:26:00 -
[357] - Quote
Skydell wrote:Zkaor wrote:
Have u actually read any of my posts ?
How can I fight back if I am AFK ? Bump away, just allow me to fight u without Concord cutting me down.
That makes me wonder why there was never a mechanic put in to place that allowed people to duel in HS.
I think you are onto something. A fight club for grudge matches or whatever. Advertise all over and charge others for the location as a spectator.
Probably wouldn't work. |

Willy Bryan
Spanked and Straddled
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:26:00 -
[358] - Quote
Oh, and James, I appoligize for botching your in-game name earlier, was looking at another guy in local when I was typing. |

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
1510
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:26:00 -
[359] - Quote
If I find out where OP is hiding, I'll bump his ass good. I'd kill kittens and puppies and bunnies I'd maim toddlers and teens and then more |

Willy Bryan
Spanked and Straddled
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.26 03:27:00 -
[360] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:Skydell wrote:Zkaor wrote:
Have u actually read any of my posts ?
How can I fight back if I am AFK ? Bump away, just allow me to fight u without Concord cutting me down.
That makes me wonder why there was never a mechanic put in to place that allowed people to duel in HS. I think you are onto something. A fight club for grudge matches or whatever. Advertise all over and charge others for the location as a spectator. Probably wouldn't work.
This is supposed to be coming; it's part of the new canflipping changes. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |