With all the isk you make from afk mining, you could easily fund a mercenary corp that will wardec and hunt the bumpers. James 514 and his minions are silly, but I think you people deserve what they do. Use your brain.

If I find out where OP is hiding, I'll bump his ass good.

So how do you do this bumping 23/7? Get a mining macro and set it up to approach barges instead of asteroids? Anything else and is this legit since your not mining or rmting?

Along the lines of what they will call a "LE"

http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73443


3rd para from bottom

collide-able ships.

/thread

That's what I thought the bounty system was going to use.

Which should mean that I could put a bounty on a miner, and my friends could blow the miner up in high sec by accepting the bounty; which would engage a LE flag between them and the miner.

I was assuming you would initiate all this when you actually saw the person in high sec space. Low and null you would just shoot them anyways.


Anywyas, I won't be happy unless miners can put bounties on bumpers to get them blown up in high sec and I can do the same to miners.

Will someone at CCP please just do all my mining for me so i can sit in station and spin my ship.........erm......etc!

Agreed. Considering that your average mining ship has something like 20x the mass of the bumper, it would be hilarious to watch miners complain about having to pick the debris of those annoying bumpers out of their grill all the time. Freighters even moreso. It would be like trying to ram a supertanker with a canoe. Pretty obvious who would win that encounter.

Well considering most decent bump ships go too fast to allow the use of the approach function, that would be a rather useless bot.

Will someone at CCP please allow miners defend (destroy) the bumpers ship without Concord intervention. As it is now all miners hands are tied and MUST submit to their extorsion tactics with no means of defense.


P.S. If this should be posted elsewhere please let me know...thanks

It's called orbiting.

Keep spreading that misinformation. Orbiting merely makes it more of a challenge for the bumpers, it does not make you immune to a bump from someone who knows what they're doing.

Some are under the impression that orbiting makes them completely immune to bumping, just clearing up a misconception

As far as I'm concerned an orbiting miner is more of a challenge and therefore more fun to try and bump.

Would you remember what I said about barrier of entry? I don't care about your NAP alliances. I care about the new people coming in and trying to build up. You build whatever the hell you want, I just don't want to see Jonny Newbie play three weeks, find it impossible to afford a damn cruiser, and then quit.

crap

You accuse me of somthing I did not do ... AFK mining.

You accuse me of something I did not do ... accusing only you of afk mining. "You" can also be plural.

If you want to fight them, then why have you not wardec-ed them? Why must CCP treat you different/better? We're all paying this game (in one way or another).

HTFU or STFU.

You can defend against anyone in roughly 80% of the universe. It is your fault for staying in the part that does not allow you to do so.

You clearly have no idea how this game works. Also not everyone wants to be in small ships. Not everyone is you.

Also also James is not a "savior" of highsec. He is an undesirable, much like you.

James is playing the game the way it was meant to be played, unlike afk miners and botters. In fact, emergent gameplay pioneers are the epitome of desirable, as they help demonstrate the possibilities in EVE online. Things like hulkageddon and burn jita are what make EVE famous, not undesirables such as yourself, who do nothing but f1 space rocks 23/7