| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Random Majere
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:23:00 -
[121] - Quote
I wish I could drive my car like James flyes is Eve ships. This would make the drive to work more interesting.  |

HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
236
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:25:00 -
[122] - Quote
James 315 is the best thing to happen to hisec in a long time Follow me on twitter |

Ix Aideron
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:26:00 -
[123] - Quote
I propose we make a new Mining only security zone, where it is illegal to take any ship but a barge. Once open, all miners will be welcomed with open arms. Then shut the gate. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1692
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:28:00 -
[124] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote: Not gameplay when paying customers are interrupted.
What do you not understand about the term gameplay? if you are playing a game, you are partaking in gameplay
Quote:And that's wonderful for you. Some of us have lives and can't stare at a screen 24/7. We mine, then use it to build the ships you so eagerly use against us...wonder what would happen if we just stopped 
If you're mining 23/7 you're obviously a bot or aspiring to be one GTFO. If you stopped mining? guess what? others will take your place and provide the same service, you are not unique, there are many more players that can fly an barge/exhumer than players that actually do.
Quote:And what happens when you get bumped or popped by GSF hm? Not so good when the shoes on the other foot? Or what happens when someone else simply undercuts you to continue to ensure cheap goods to the rest of New Eden? 
Getting ganked or being bumped is a cost of doing business, you deal with it and move on. Alternatively you can cry about it, which we actually prefer because your tears? they fuel the gank & bump campaigns. Somebody undercuts me on the market? meh so what, prices fluctuate daily and I & many other traders have enough liquid isk to push prices back up within a day or so by buying out the competition, or ignoring the undercutter until all their stuff is sold.
Quote:And that is exactly how you'll be pushed out. CCP will protect it's earnings and income as opposed to allowing belligerent undesirable behavior 
Good luck with that, I'll leave you with this
CCP Wrangler wrote: "EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for. " Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
862
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:29:00 -
[125] - Quote
Zkaor wrote:Will someone at CCP please allow miners defend (destroy) the bumpers ship without Concord intervention. As it is now all miners hands are tied and MUST submit to their extorsion tactics with no means of defense.
P.S. If this should be posted elsewhere please let me know...thanks
1st and last possible answer to this thread: don't mine= don't get bump=don't post crap
Translation for dumb: stop mining.
Translation for even dumber: stop mining and logging
Translation for dudes being bigger dumb as dumb are to normal people: stop mining and logging, unsub and don't get back before a couple months.
Problem solved (because subs) brb |

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1692
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:31:00 -
[126] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:You just want CCP to ensure that high sec continues to maintain it's communist grip on industry in New Eden. First it was ganking, now it's bumping. You guys wont be happy untill all of New Eden has to succumb to your playstyle. Once you stop threatening ours and demanding CCP nerfs highsec, then we'll stop  Jonah Gravenstein wrote:How is that extortion, that's paramount to calling any real world business extortionists when they publish their shareholders reports. You're very bad at analogies. How is; 1) Point gun at persons head 2) Hey I'll not hurt you if you pay me money 3) Money paid a "business" and not extortion? Typical logic of the undesirables.
Nope, shareholders voluntarily give money to The New Order, mining licences holders names do not appear on minerbumping.com, James goes out of his way to ensure their anonymity and protect them from retribution from the naysayers
Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:34:00 -
[127] - Quote
[quote=Jonah GravensteinWhat do you not understand about the term gameplay? if you are playing a game, you are partaking in gameplay.[/quote] Not when I don't get what I paid for.
Quote: If you're mining 23/7 you're obviously a bot or aspiring to be one GTFO. If you stopped mining? guess what? others will take your place and provide the same service, you are not unique, there are many more players that can fly an barge/exhumer than players that actually do.. Of course I alone would do nothing. Learn to read. I said all miners.
Quote:Getting ganked or being bumped is a cost of doing business, you deal with it and move on. Alternatively you can cry about it, which we actually prefer because your tears? they fuel the gank & bump campaigns. Somebody undercuts me on the market? meh so what, prices fluctuate daily and I & many other traders have enough liquid isk to push prices back up within a day or so by buying out the competition, or ignoring the undercutter until all their stuff is sold.. OK, that's your take on it. Not everyone elses.
As for your little outdated quote, times change. Businesses change. You want the money? Adapt. Niche markets can't survive long without diversity. And the diversity wants safety. Deal with it  |

Shalua Rui
FEROX AQUILA
6887
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:35:00 -
[128] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Shalua Rui wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Entitled, there's your problem right there, you are entitled to nothing in this game. yea, well... and I say that with the utmost neutrality... that no longer applyies to ANY game with monthly fees... these times are long gone. Not according to the EULA and Terms of Service you agreed to when you signed up to pay and play. The only thing you are entitled to is access to the server, with the understanding that even that can and will be interrupted from time to time.
Ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire! |

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:35:00 -
[129] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nope, shareholders voluntarily give money to The New Order, mining licences holders names do not appear on minerbumping.com, James goes out of his way to ensure their anonymity and protect them from retribution from the naysayers
You lie more than Mitt Romney
1) He doesn't go out of his way to protect anyone, look at his latest post on his blog.
2) They "voluntarily" pay because they are coerced with endless bumps. There is no voluntary donation you simple undesirable |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:39:00 -
[130] - Quote
Someone is confusing shareholders with miners.
Shareholders support James 315 and the New Order, but don't mine. Miners of course also support the New Order, but they buy a 10M indulgence. They're not shareholders. It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:42:00 -
[131] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Someone is confusing shareholders with miners.
Shareholders support James 315 and the New Order, but don't mine. Miners of course also support the New Order, but they buy a 10M indulgence. They're not shareholders.
Caught in your own lie, hm?
As I said, undesirable belligerents ruining customer experience. She was coerced, paid your RANSOM, and also purchased stock, making her a shareholder. Why she did that is anyone's guess, maybe to try to get on your good side so she can mine in peace. Either way, criminal scum is all you are  |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:47:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:She was coerced, paid your RANSOM, and also purchased stock, making her a shareholder. No one forced her to buy the shares though. And as I said, in general the shareholders aren't even miners. You don't seem to grasp the distinction between the New Order asking miners to buy an indulgence for mining and investors buying shares out of their own free will.
It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Zhade Lezte
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:49:00 -
[133] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote: Not in high sec, they're entitled, they're not bothering anyone. It's ok though, high sec will be made safer soon, and the undesirables will be pushed out :)
And this is about when I realized our lovely Tali is an idiot or a troll (leaning troll).
Good thread, would read again, gotta consider becoming a New Order shareholder now. |

Tali Ambraelle
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:49:00 -
[134] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:No one forced her to buy the shares though. Fear of your "crusade" most likely did. She probably wanted to, as I said, "get on your good side..." What good side you have, I'll never know.
Quote:And as I said, in general the shareholders aren't even miners. Except they are, as state previously in this thread, a miner is a shareholder for he hopes the higher prices will help him.
Quote:You don't seem to grasp the distinction between the New Order asking miners to buy an indulgence for mining and investors buying shares out of their own free will.
I believe I do. You use fear and coercion like scumbag criminal mobsters. Belligerent undesirables have the oddest logic 
|

Twoso
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:57:00 -
[135] - Quote
To all the "miners suck" type trolls: People have been bitching about neutral repping for years. The primary argument was and is that its consequence-free game play that ruins high sec pvp. So CCP is fixing it. I don't hear anyone bitching about the fix to repping. Pretty much everyone seems to agree that it wasn't "fair" that someone could have such an outsized effect with absolutely no way to get at them. Here you have a clearly aggressive act that is being used not just for destroying the income-generation ability of miners but also bumping ships to prevent warping and other griefing objectives.
Why is it that this is okay to totally **** things up with no ability for the person being bumped to fight back? Please explain, in excruciating detail, how repping was bad, but bumping isn't. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1694
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:57:00 -
[136] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Nanatoa wrote:Someone is confusing shareholders with miners.
Shareholders support James 315 and the New Order, but don't mine. Miners of course also support the New Order, but they buy a 10M indulgence. They're not shareholders. Caught in your own lie, hm?As I said, undesirable belligerents ruining customer experience. She was coerced, paid your RANSOM, and also purchased stock, making her a shareholder. Why she did that is anyone's guess, maybe to try to get on your good side so she can mine in peace. Either way, criminal scum is all you are  EDIT: BTW, how does your "righteous" crusade stand against "afk" miners...when they aren't afk, and are indeed talking to you? 
Shareholders do not get a free mining permit, as a shareholder if I want to mine in a system controlled by The New Order I have to purchase a mining permit. One of the shareholders is a mining corp, their miners still have to purchase individual permits, although they may get a bulk discount if they ask nicely.
Heavy-met4l-queen did not have to purchase shares after purchasing a permit, that is her own choice.
as for AFK miners, James clearly states that they are not allowed, this does not absolve active miners from the offence of mining without a permit. AFK means exactly that, if you need to visit the bathroom, grab a bite to eat etc, dock up, if you don't you are in breach of the Code.
Tali Ambraelle wrote: Of course I alone would do nothing. Learn to read. I said all miners.
In the context of the original post by yourself I think that you'll find that my reply covers all miners. Miners are not unique, I would say that a large majority of people who don't currently mine can fly the ships that miners do. You can be replaced, deal with it.
I'm one of the minority of James's shareholders that are miners, I am a shareholder because
- it's economically viable for me to be so
- it hurts my competition thus making my mining time more valuable
- I'm also a trader and I consider the cost of my shares as a worthwhile investment in economic warfare
- it amuses me to sponsor a campaign to rid Eve of mining bots and AFK players, by mining
Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
596
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:57:00 -
[137] - Quote
Tali Ambraelle wrote:Nanatoa wrote:No one forced her to buy the shares though. Fear of your "crusade" most likely did. She probably wanted to, as I said, "get on your good side..." What good side you have, I'll never know. Quote:And as I said, in general the shareholders aren't even miners. Except they are, as state previously in this thread, a miner is a shareholder for he hopes the higher prices will help him. Quote:You don't seem to grasp the distinction between the New Order asking miners to buy an indulgence for mining and investors buying shares out of their own free will. I believe I do. You use fear and coercion like scumbag criminal mobsters. Belligerent undesirables have the oddest logic 
Nonnono. Shareholders are shareholders.
Miners are customers. :) |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1090
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 19:58:00 -
[138] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:A few points: 1: The bumping mechanic in EVE was modified in the past to be less pronounced, but ships still bob around like corks when in close proximity. For immersion reasons alone it should be modified again to at least LOOK somewhat believable. 2: Goons, or anyone else for that matter, have every right to try and extort money from miners (or anyone else that lets them get away with it). 3: Yes, you will be able to put a bounty on a bumper soon... but that's really not a solution unless the bumpers are flying ships that are worth the security hit to pop and collect the bounty on. 4: Hmmm, looks like there is a need for a smaller, faster mining vessel that will be more difficult to bump for people that insist on mining in systems that have a bump operation in progress. Sort of a ninja mining vessel, perhaps frigate sized.  And can mine ice. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Elvis Fett
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
96
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 20:02:00 -
[139] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:CCP, Buff bumping. I want dedicated bumping ship with 1 high slot for Tear Harvester II, and low slot for Tear Harvester Upgrade II.
Bumping has many uses in EVE, many beyond just harassing miners (which I must admit is quite a good use of the mechanic). I am surprised we haven't seen a battering ram ship. Battleship mass, frigate speed, 1 high slot (no turret/missile slots, utility only). |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
871
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 20:04:00 -
[140] - Quote
"Allowing miners to defend themselves" has proven to be a gigantic slippery slope in the past. Giving them an inch in any direction is inevitably going to result in highsec having even less player to player interaction in it. |

Vanyr Andrard
Foo Holdings Free 2 Play
15
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 20:09:00 -
[141] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:"Allowing miners to defend themselves" has proven to be a gigantic slippery slope in the past. Giving them an inch in any direction is inevitably going to result in highsec having even less player to player interaction in it.
It's rare that someone using the "slippery slope fallacy" will actually stop to destroy their argument by referring to it as such. Perhaps it's a result of being surrounded by so much ice...badabing! |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
862
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 20:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Twoso wrote:To all the "miners suck" type trolls: People have been bitching about neutral repping for years. The primary argument was and is that its consequence-free game play that ruins high sec pvp.
Thing is that grieffing and bulling is the major part of this game and rules/mechanics are set to over reward those.
You may call it as you want, you might as well find as many arguments as you want but facts are there, just open your eyes, read and figure out even if you have less tha 100IQ wich seems to be at least 100% already higher than average eve player.
There's absolutely nothing, really nothing to make this game evolve to something "acceptable" with actual player numbers, there's even less acceptable if you even figure out CCP is a company and as so should be on the road of success instead of a simple "special nerds" thing.
It's their stuff after all, I got bored a couple times and kept accounts because "hope" something interesting happens, thing is that actually interesting things are happening. Then it's not of my business or yours whatever happens if something else gets interesting above this cold (grieffing) harsh (ganking) universe (you simply can't explore anyway)
It's gaming life, things go up and things go down. brb |

Tubrug1
The League of Distinguished Gentlemen
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 20:18:00 -
[143] - Quote
As the bumper in question here, I would like to point one thing out. Wars.
P.S. See www.minerbumping.com Don't listen to what i say |

Devon Krah'tor
Magis.Erudire.Ratus.Knoen
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 21:34:00 -
[144] - Quote
Hire Mercenaries with the funds you earn afk mining.
Greater.Insight.Skill.Knowledge |

Arduemont
Lords 0f Justice Fidelas Constans
507
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 21:40:00 -
[145] - Quote
Start a crusade to add massive bounties to their corporations.
Post in local, send mails to other Industrial corps. Every little helps.
In Eve you are significantly more powerful than you think you are. Wait a couple of weeks, infiltrate their corp with a couple of friends and then gank them the next time one undocks in their most expensive PvE ship. Don't whine about it, do something. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 21:52:00 -
[146] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:Tali Ambraelle wrote:No More Heroes wrote:Zkaor wrote:Will someone at CCP please allow miners defend (destroy) the bumpers ship without Concord intervention. As it is now all miners hands are tied and MUST submit to their extorsion tactics with no means of defense.
P.S. If this should be posted elsewhere please let me know...thanks Pay the fee, it's 10m isk to afk to your little hearts content. Why should he have to pay a fee for a resource center that does not belong to this group? Because that group has the ability and desire to disrupt that resource center. I don't make a thread on EVE-O whenever a roaming gang comes through my ratting system and disrupts my resource center, I adapt and DEAL WITH IT. Or you can just pay 10m isk and be done with it!
For me its a matter of principal and self respect and dignity. I refuse to allow someone to exploit a game mechanic to force me into something I dont want to do. |

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 21:57:00 -
[147] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote: For me its a matter of principal and self respect and dignity. I refuse to allow someone to exploit a game mechanic to force me into something I dont want to do.
But you will allow someone to force you out of something you do want to do? Where's the self respect and dignity in that? It is not an exploit btw. It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Jonah Gravenstein
Mahatma Cote Temporal Research
1696
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 22:19:00 -
[148] - Quote
Elvis Fett wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:CCP, Buff bumping. I want dedicated bumping ship with 1 high slot for Tear Harvester II, and low slot for Tear Harvester Upgrade II. Bumping has many uses in EVE, many beyond just harassing miners (which I must admit is quite a good use of the mechanic). I am surprised we haven't seen a battering ram ship. Battleship mass, frigate speed, 1 high slot (no turret/missile slots, utility only).
If CCP would let us adapt more current hulls via an expansion of subsystems then I'm pretty sure we would come up with one, preferably with a pointy bit at the front like the new Minmatar Killdozer, as it is MWD Machariels are pretty boss at removing stubborn and heavy ships like Orcas.
HollyShocker 2inthestink, talks about self respect, names himself after a sexual deviation  Homo sapiens non urinat in ventum -á-á-á ---CCP can't patch stupid--- |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1519
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 23:10:00 -
[149] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:For me its a matter of principal and self respect and dignity. I refuse to allow someone to exploit a game mechanic to force me into something I dont want to do.
Except that its not an 'exploit' and is a valid game mechanic no matter how much the bad men are abusing you and disrupting your gameplay. Collision and the ability to bump and be bumped has existed for years.
All because someone has figured out something new and innovative to do with it doesn't warrant a call to remove the mechanic entirely, or in this case- a demand by spoiled players to be able to ~defend~ themselves against it.
(you can) primary target is broadcasted, put all drones on the warp disruption battery. If you are in a frigate you should be at the gate, who blew up? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1611
|
Posted - 2012.10.24 23:17:00 -
[150] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:For me its a matter of principal and self respect and dignity. I refuse to allow someone to exploit a game mechanic to force me into something I dont want to do. Except that its not an 'exploit' and is a valid game mechanic no matter how much the bad men are abusing you and disrupting your gameplay. Collision and the ability to bump and be bumped has existed for years. All because someone has figured out something new and innovative to do with it doesn't warrant a call to remove the mechanic entirely, or in this case- a demand by spoiled players to be able to ~defend~ themselves against it. (you can) Miners were clearly intended to happily afk in the belt.... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |