You know the entire manufacturing structure of EVE is in Jita due to the proximity to all the technetium...

Yes, the reason that Jita is the game's main trade hub is because of technetium and goons. That's the only possible reason.

Which is probably stems from their everyday life where they are very rarely acknowledged and usually overlooked and ignored. Which in turn is likely justified because they have no redeeming qualities in their personality , have no ability to take any kind of responsibility for their failures and refuse to approach any issues with an objective view.

Get a room, you two.

Get a room, you two.

I've been monitoring the killboards and nothings shown up recently with "just trit". Is it even possible to have a value of a freighter that provides a chance of a reward when it contains only trit?

To some degree but EVE is an old game and has a very bad reputation for being full of antisocial misfits. Like you.

You damage EVE when EVE needs new blood. You are selfish. You could be in any 0.0 sec doing roams, not to take Sov, just for PvP. No, you chose to sit in one system and exploit human flaw and ruin a game for others. You won't be missed. You won't be welcome in any other MMO either. They would put you out on your ear in the blink of an eye.

You twist EVE in to something it wasn't supposed to be. A place with a complete lack of common sense or dignity.

Keep your stuff. Donate it to one of the people you griefed.

Hmm, what's been the lowest cargo freigther gank done in the last 2 months?
If it's >= 1B then the game is not broken.

We do gank red freighters and JFs for much less.

You'd be stupid to have a freighter full of only trit instead of compressing it in to T1 large guns. which is done to transport trit.

"Which is probably stems from their everyday life where they are very rarely acknowledged and usually overlooked and ignored."

You don't know anything about their everyday life.

"Which in turn is likely justified because they have no redeeming qualities in their personality"

You don't know enough about their personality to make this either a justification or a conclusion.

"have no ability to take any kind of responsibility for their failures and refuse to approach any issues with an objective view"

Now, I can see why this would be relevant if you were talking specifically about using the forums to complain instead of doing something about their problems in-game, but when you start your post with "probably stems from their everyday life" it becomes antagonistic and presumptuous, and not just a little arrogant.

Those kinds of posts are disgusting, and they don't reflect well on your argument at all.

We do gank red freighters and JFs for much less.

You've raised those points already and I believe I've provided suitable rebuttals to counter your arguments. There is really nothing left to say to you but I shall provide you with some light viewing that you might find informative and skills that provide you with the tools to argue properly, both on the internet and in real life.

The "straw man" fallacy.


Also i'm down to get rid of this sexual tension. Bring some lotion unless you want me to go in dry.

So, in other words, the only way to "fix this exploit" is to completely remove any and all bumping in the game?

I've lost a freighter to this exploit, and yes, using the bumping mechanic to get the kill IS an exploit.

Bumping should be allowed, it should just make more sense. A frigate going 5km/s should explode into scrap when it flies directly into a freighter. Contrast this with what actually occurs in game right now.

Now picture the undock at Jita 4-4 as small ships come flying out and bumping into larger ones... or as ships are warping in to bookmarked points at the undock. Just picture the chaos... the death and destruction ;) that is, if you are suggesting collision damage, there are a wide range of physics issues that would have to be tended to to implement these ships "exploding into scrap" and it's just not cost effective when there are already means available to players to avoid being bumped. Such as not being AFK, or on AP.

And I still make more sense than you, clinging to this half baked idea that EVE can work when people don't use self control to restrict the damage they do. I'm out numbered here, being ganked in to the ground and while I do care, not enough to fight battles CCP have chosen not to fight.

If it's OK with them, it's OK with me. You still missed the point in me debating you. Maybe EVE is healthy as a horse. If so, carry on. Maybe this is what they want.

I am imagining Cribba putting the Veldnaught in siege mode with Reppers in front of the Amarr dock. People coming online and undocking into the side of it like throwing eggs on a barn.

Now picture the undock at Jita 4-4 as small ships come flying out and bumping into larger ones... or as ships are warping in to bookmarked points at the undock. Just picture the chaos... the death and destruction ;) that is, if you are suggesting collision damage, there are a wide range of physics issues that would have to be tended to to implement these ships "exploding into scrap" and it's just not cost effective when there are already means available to players to avoid being bumped. Such as not being AFK, or on AP.

Now picture the undock at Jita 4-4 as small ships come flying out and bumping into larger ones... or as ships are warping in to bookmarked points at the undock. Just picture the chaos... the death and destruction ;) that is, if you are suggesting collision damage, there are a wide range of physics issues that would have to be tended to to implement these ships "exploding into scrap" and it's just not cost effective when there are already means available to players to avoid being bumped. Such as not being AFK, or on AP.

Ah yes, the jita undock strawman argument, brought out every single time someone suggests collision damage. If someone actually says "just implement collision damage, it's just 3 lines of code", then yes, that's a reasonably reply. If the person you're responding to doesn't say something like that, then assuming that the implementation of collision damage won't in some fashion address the jita 4-4 undock, when just that has been mentioned over 656 quintillion times on the forums, is so naive as to definitively fall into the strawman fallacy category.

Ah yes, the jita undock strawman argument, brought out every single time someone suggests collision damage. If someone actually says "just implement collision damage, it's just 3 lines of code", then yes, that's a reasonable reply. If the person you're responding to doesn't say something like that, then assuming that the implementation of collision damage won't in some fashion address the jita 4-4 undock, when just that has been mentioned over 656 quintillion times on the forums, is so naive as to definitively fall into the strawman fallacy category.

ridiculous that crap like this is allowed to continue. Part of why the "pvp" in this game is considered to be such a joke.

ridiculous that crap like this is allowed to continue. Part of why the "pvp" in this game is considered to be such a joke.