Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
28
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
|

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
1190
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
Get out. www.minerbumping.com - because your tears are delicious |

ACE McFACE
The Forsworn Protectorate Imperial Protectorate
900
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
No "No one drove in New York, there was too much traffic." |

Zeko Rena
ENCOM Industries
33
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
|

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
357
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's a good idea. Don't let the dedicate griefer entitlement gang tell you otherwise. |

Red Teufel
Blackened Skies
114
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
it's called lowsec and 0.0. try it sometime. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2298
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
It's time CCP......ban Lord Wiggin from the forums.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
357
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Red Teufel wrote:it's called lowsec and 0.0. try it sometime.
I think he wants PvP where he isn't being jumped by the gank-alot bear every time. |

Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
729
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'm in favor only if I can make isk doing this. CCP nerfed me because my body was too boobylicious. |

RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
63
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
Red Teufel wrote:it's called lowsec and 0.0. try it sometime.
0.0 is **** these days i guess you didnt get the memo? |

baltec1
Bat Country
3318
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies. |

Usagi Toshiro
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Red Teufel wrote:it's called lowsec and 0.0. try it sometime. I think he wants PvP where he isn't being jumped by the gank-alot bear every time.
To play devils advocate; maybe a system like this would encourage some carebears to try their hand in low/null sec after a few victories? |

Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
981
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
G e t
O u t |

Ammzi
Infinite Covenant Tribal Band
1080
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:32:00 -
[14] - Quote
Get out as quick as possible. Also biomass.
And no one wants your stuff. quote CCP Spitfire
"Hello Im Blue,"
|

Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
It's already there, I'd consider RvB to be EVEs arena. Atleast in most ways. I"m not really the Evil One, I'm just his answering service. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
82
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
No, no and no.
|

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
357
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies.
You do realize it's dead in EVE too?
An Arena wouldn't stop the T1 Industrial farming at low sec bottlenecks or PvE fit kill mails in anoms. Outside of those and random roaming kills, there is no PvP in EVE. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
511
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies.
So this is why people don't want an arena ?
All the other replies might as well not be there as they say nothing.
EVERYBODY KNOWS |

Landrae
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
393
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Welcome to Eve Online |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
216
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Arenas... and i thought i'd seen It all in this forums... If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

baltec1
Bat Country
3319
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
You do realize it's dead in EVE too?
Its so dead that the CFC has a dosen fleets up at any one time all getting fights. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1420
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Only if the Grand Champion gets an immortal adoring fan that follows you everywhere & annoys the crap out of you, making you wish that you had never suggested this terrible idea. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
287
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
Like if CCP wasn't busy with Dust release. Forget about new content for at least 18+ months (Dust release + PC version). |

Etherealclam
Imperial Combat Engineers Empire of Arcadia
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
I fully support this. Global ganking is and always has been a bad thing. |

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
393
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:48:00 -
[25] - Quote
It already exists, it is called the test sever. Go there.
The whole point of EVE pvp is that there is no huge amount of rules telling me how I can pvp like arenas do. Take away all the uncertainty and risk in pvp and you turn it into a boring activity. |

Phil Da Agony
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:51:00 -
[26] - Quote
YEAH! Put arenas and let us bet ISK there, but please, the fights will involve only npc ships.
Ty CCP. |

Toshiroma McDiesel
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 00:53:00 -
[27] - Quote
Phil Da Agony wrote:YEAH! Put arenas and let us bet ISK there, but please, the fights will involve only npc ships.
Ty CCP.
Again, this is something that can be set up and run completely by players. (and the chances for meta gaming would be interesting)  I"m not really the Evil One, I'm just his answering service. |

Ginger Barbarella
Estel Arador Corp Services
336
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
Why in the freakin' hell would CCP go to the time and expense to put in a mechanic that's COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY USELESS given that the mechanics already exist today?!? Why?
Do some of you even think before posting this crap? IF you want an intarwebs spaceships game with the whole "wanna duel?" BS in it, make your own. Fly Minmatar Air --- "Trust in the Rust!" |

YuuKnow
Inner 5phere
487
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:12:00 -
[29] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
You want arenas, then go to the test server.
yk |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
357
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Ocih wrote:
You do realize it's dead in EVE too?
Its so dead that the CFC has a dosen fleets up at any one time all getting fights.
No, you are getting kills. The kind I mentioned before you hacked up my reply in your misquote. Industrial and PvE kills. You would continue to get those with an Arena because I can't haul trit through an Arena or grind ISK in an arena. Give it up, PvP is dead in this game. |

Aralieus
Shadowbane Syndicate
30
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Test Server...nuff said Oderint Dum Metuant |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
117
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

baltec1
Bat Country
3321
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ocih wrote:
No, you are getting kills. The kind I mentioned before you hacked up my reply in your misquote. Industrial and PvE kills. You would continue to get those with an Arena because I can't haul trit through an Arena or grind ISK in an arena. Give it up, PvP is dead in this game.
PVP
is
dead
Nevermind the thousands of ships that get blown up doing it every single day... |

Oberine Noriepa
1058
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
Vaal Erit wrote:It already exists, it is called the test sever. Go there. Pretty much. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1422
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:40:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ocih wrote:
You do realize it's dead in EVE too?
Its so dead that the CFC has a dosen fleets up at any one time all getting fights. No, you are getting kills. The kind I mentioned before you hacked up my reply in your misquote. Industrial and PvE kills. You would continue to get those with an Arena because I can't haul trit through an Arena or grind ISK in an arena. Give it up, PvP is dead in this game.
Tell us more about PvP being dead in a PvP-centric game. A short, 500-word essay should cover it. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
349
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 01:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
How the **** do you remove a signature? |

James Amril-Kesh
RAZOR Alliance
1475
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:04:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies. You do realize it's dead in EVE too? An Arena wouldn't stop the T1 Industrial farming at low sec bottlenecks or PvE fit kill mails in anoms. Outside of those and random roaming kills, there is no PvP in EVE. L O L -áObjects in mirror aren't as red as they appear. |

ACE McFACE
The Forsworn Protectorate Imperial Protectorate
904
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:06:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ocih wrote:It's a good idea. Don't let the dedicate griefer entitlement gang tell you otherwise. There's a difference between going "NO NO NO CHANGE IS BAD" and saying "no" to a terrible idea. "No one drove in New York, there was too much traffic." |
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
2697

|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
725
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:06:00 -
[40] - Quote
Arenas could be done in such a way as to not adversely affect risk pvp.
First, don't televise the action. Instead make a mechanism to televise real pvp.
Second, zero rewards mechanisms.
Third, allow cheating.
Fourth, make it cost.
Fifth, make it P2W where pants and monocles reign supreme.
Sixth, only allow 1v1 or 10v1 since that's more of the routine in Eve. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Romvex
206
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:23:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. God has spoken. Thread closed. Post with your main |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
358
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Ocih wrote:
No, you are getting kills. The kind I mentioned before you hacked up my reply in your misquote. Industrial and PvE kills. You would continue to get those with an Arena because I can't haul trit through an Arena or grind ISK in an arena. Give it up, PvP is dead in this game.
PVPisdeadNevermind the thousands of ships that get blown up doing it every single day...
And those few and far between training ops.. I mean battles can still happen with an arena. Keep the spin cycle going though Baltec. CCP chimed in and they see Arena additions as just that too. Additions. Things you can't control. I know, the atrocity of it all. |

MadMuppet
A Better Corp Name
659
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:38:00 -
[43] - Quote
The idea of a block of space that players can use that is immune from other players interacting with for their own benefit just doesn't seem very 'EVE' to me. In addition, there should be zero content available from doing it (no shield items, no BPs, no isk, no ships, etc) that is not player supplied or created. Such a system, with a leaderboard and official standings, will be exploited, pointless, and not worth the DEV's time to code. November 6th, 2012 "With this in mind, it becomes quite obvious to focus on training the Destroyers and Battlecruisers skills before the change to get the maximum return effect. We highly recommend you start doing so now." --á CCP Ytterbium from:-áhttp://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73530 |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
358
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:47:00 -
[44] - Quote
MadMuppet wrote:The idea of a block of space that players can use that is immune from other players interacting with for their own benefit just doesn't seem very 'EVE' to me. In addition, there should be zero content available from doing it (no shield items, no BPs, no isk, no ships, etc) that is not player supplied or created. Such a system, with a leaderboard and official standings, will be exploited, pointless, and not worth the DEV's time to code.
"Not very EVE".
You mean that Sand box game that has a variety of things to do?
Or the Blob and grind, blow stuff uppy game where you spin ships 90% of the time?
|

fukier
RISE of LEGION
287
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
The only way this would work is scrap the arena and replace with enhanced pvp contract system... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2138
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 02:55:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ocih wrote:"Not very EVE".
You mean that Sand box game that has a variety of things to do?
Or the Blob and grind, blow stuff uppy game where you spin ships 90% of the time?
That sandbox game that doesn't have player conflict, market trends, or rigid tactics or mechanics rigidly controlled by the game developers. The sandbox game that, instead of having a Horde and an Alliance, allows players to form their own factions, express their own ideas, and follow their own goals. The sandbox game that, instead of giving you solutions to being bored, gives you tools to make your own solutions to being bored.
That sandbox game that does not need a central organized "arena" or dry, limited, and sharded PvP, but may need tools to help players better implement systems in which they can run tournaments/betting.
Now that "limited engagement" is a concept present in Eve, allowing for "gentleman's duel" contracts with public verified details of outcome is only one step away, and would be a massive step towards enabling players to organize their own tournaments. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Kenpachi Viktor
Gradient Electus Matari
228
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:07:00 -
[47] - Quote
Arenas could be done as a separate game - FtP, no sandbox, with matchmaking. skills/ships/fittings acquired/lost as per Dust 514. What is the point if every race has an Jam/Damp/Disruptor/ ship etc? Not every race has to be a fluffy little mirror of each other, it's seriously not needed. Things like Gallente having the only drone BS and Caldari having the only ECM BS are incredibly cool distinctions that only add to EVE in both game play value and flavour. |

Kanta Kansene
Agentes in rebus Relativity Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Two ships enter, one will leave! We'll sell you the whole seat, but you'll only need the edge! Sunday, Sunday, Sunday! I think an environment that promotes 1vs1 pvp without interference would be pretty nifty. Make the interior of the arena a separate "system" from the exterior to remove OGB and have some sort of interface to choose the format (1v1, 2vs2, etc...asteroid field, station wreckage, drone hive...)
Not promoting any rewards beyond bragging rights, mind you, this is solely for the spirit I believe was intended by the OP...entertainment for the people doing the PVP, no outside interference, and some way to televise the events to those screens out in space and to the CQ |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2248
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1.
If you and your duelling partner are the only two people in local, you can guarantee 1v1.
If you and your partner are in the same corporation, you can guarantee 1v1.
Thus your principle claim is easily falsified. Your argument has no merit.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Bluetippedflyer
Mafia Redux
29
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:21:00 -
[50] - Quote
no |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
763
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:31:00 -
[51] - Quote
People forget, arenas in other games aren't part of the actual game world.
There would be nothing wrong with it in EVE, done EVE style.
A couple designated systems, NPC's tied to directing the mechanids.
You would sign up, and be required to be there.
People would be losing ships.
Don't think WoW arenas.
Think Jita, but everyone is watching people blow each other up, in the EVE equivilant of a boxing match. Everything in the system would be there to support structured matches between capsuleers.
Lineage 2 had stuff like this. It was actually nice, because it was taking place in the world; you could see it happening. It was nothing like arenas in WoW, Rift, or EQ2.
And they said they've talked about this internally at the last CSM thingy, if I recall. |

Orzo Torasson
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
83
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 03:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
EVE already has an arena like this and it's quite hard for people to find. The easy way to tell if you have stumbled across it is to look at the top left corner of your screen, there will be a number there. If it's 0.4 or lower, congratulations! You've found it.
|

Mars Theran
Pod Kings
510
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 04:02:00 -
[53] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
I find it ironic that you suggest the ones that don't sit at their desks playing in space constantly are couch potatoes. 
..but regardless, I'm not sure I like this. There's a middlesec thread around here where I posted something similar though. No 1.0 or 0.9, or whatever arenas though; just a limited engagement flagging system for lower security level highsec.
edit: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2333031#post2333031 zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Mars Theran
Pod Kings
510
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 04:11:00 -
[54] - Quote
Orzo Torasson wrote:EVE already has an arena like this and it's quite hard for people to find. The easy way to tell if you have stumbled across it is to look at the top left corner of your screen, there will be a number there. If it's 0.4 or lower, congratulations! You've found it.
No, it's not, and you're mistaken.
0.4 and lower is for cap blobbing and fleets, not for 1 v 1, though if you can find a quiet spot you might have the opportunity for it.. but then, if you're getting someone to go have a scrap with and flying out to the nearest lowsec, it kind of ruins the flavor I imagine.
Highsec had station games yes, but since Crimewatch 2.0 those are obsolete with suspect flags for opening cans and no way to otherwise create a limited engagement that is truly limited. That's a pretty big chunk of player interest, (whatever its value), chucked out the window with that change.
Dodixie, Rens, Aunia, and other places all had some degree of 1v1 until that happened. Even Jita did, though more often it was cheating and finding ways to avoid risk on the part of a number of those interested. Still, it was something thy did. zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Erika Bronz
Nidaros Fritidsforening
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 04:58:00 -
[55] - Quote
Arena: http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/Arena
Closest medic (1 jump, h-sec): http://evemaps.dotlan.net/system/Serad |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1966
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 05:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
I think it would be grand, though draw much ire of the purists, if there was a simulation mode in the stations. That is, "a simulator within a simulator" if you look at the game as a simulator.
This would certainly get accused of being "no loss PVP", and there is a test server for this purpose, but it would be a nice feature to be able to enter a combat simulation mode with other players to test out a fit without having to port to the test server.
I don't imagine the overhead would be easy. Just one of those "gee, wouldn't it be nice" sort of things. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2307
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 05:24:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. You do realize if the griefers in this game can't interfere with these thing if players are running them they will need rage so hard.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1428
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 05:27:00 -
[58] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. You do realize if the griefers in this game can't interfere with these thing if players are running them they will need rage so hard.
Griefing is a bannable offence. If it won't get you banned then it's not griefing. Also, what is 'need rage'? It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1966
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 05:34:00 -
[59] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. You do realize if the griefers in this game can't interfere with these thing if players are running them they will need rage so hard. Griefing is a bannable offence. If it won't get you banned then it's not griefing. Also, what is 'need rage'?
Probably meant "nerd rage".
|

Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille Gallente Federation
32
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 05:42:00 -
[60] - Quote
Nobody cares about arenas or watching meaningless spaceship combat sports.
Focus on increasing and improving gameplay objectives for small and medium sized organisations, things to have real fights over. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1966
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 06:16:00 -
[61] - Quote
Something just occurred to me.
In the state I live in, Washington USA, there is a law regarding "Mutual combat". That is, if I and someone else decide to beat the crap out of each other, it's totally legal. There was a case recently with a local "superhero" called Phoenix Jones, who battled it out with a thug while the cops watched. (the news people wrung their hands over it, saying that the law should be changed, - real world carbearism at it's finest).
Of course, this would suck to most people but perhaps it's time to have a "duel" option like in (don't get sick now) WoW? Basically a person on person combat agreement that leaves Concorde response out of it. It would be a good way to get some combat for testing fits without having to be in the same corp, can flip and get suspect flagged, etc.
Just an idea. I now go and don the asbestos panties (with lace - hubba hubba).
|

Luis Graca
152
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 06:29:00 -
[62] - Quote
If people actually want that they just need to create a chat channel to arrange fights, and i'm only say because i have no idea on how the RvB thing ended
But then again it maybe be difficult to think a little when they can just cry for stuff |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2309
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 06:37:00 -
[63] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. You do realize if the griefers in this game can't interfere with these thing if players are running them they will need rage so hard. Griefing is a bannable offence. If it won't get you banned then it's not griefing. Also, what is 'need rage'? Probably meant "nerd rage". the beer is good
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Kanta Kansene
Agentes in rebus Relativity Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 06:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
Maelle LuzArdiden wrote:Nobody cares about arenas or watching meaningless spaceship combat sports.
Focus on increasing and improving gameplay objectives for small and medium sized organisations, things to have real fights over.
It seems that some people do |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
61
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 07:24:00 -
[65] - Quote
OP wants an arena without 2xPLEX entry fee. Something tells me that it's not gonna happen anytime soon  |

Sentamon
374
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 07:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies.
^ this ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
818
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:00:00 -
[67] - Quote
Go away |
|

CCP Falcon
1413

|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
While I understand this is a topic that generates a lot of very extreme feelings from members of the Community, keep it civil and don't spam.
If you're going to contribute, do so in a coherent and civil manner. Posting one liners will be regarded as spam and treated as such.
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á-á@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents
-- Disciple Of The Delicious Tea -- |
|

Matthew97
Pro Synergy ARK.
90
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:28:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote: While I understand this is a topic that generates a lot of very extreme feelings from members of the Community, keep it civil and don't spam.
If you're going to contribute, do so in a coherent and civil manner. Posting one liners will be regarded as spam and treated as such.
@CCP Falcon
With regards to arenas, it kinda ruins the PVP idea of EvE and isn't needed.
Go to null / low sec or organize one with a corpy |

pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
784
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:43:00 -
[70] - Quote
can somebody points out to the OP the fastest route to low sec or nullsec , also heared that FW has alot of pewpew
losing doesn't hurt you know , maybe it s time you took some real risk I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2313
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ok so lets say 'Arenas' is something that is going to happen if we like it or not. Perhaps we can discuss what it should and should not be and maybe, just maybe we could help define what would be acceptable... dare I say... wanted?
I will go first.
Any player should be able to place bets on all matches without having to use some 3rd party, i.e. Chribba, to handle it. It should be a slick UI mechanic too.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Bitten.
694
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 10:18:00 -
[72] - Quote
Biomass your characters and unsub, wiggin. You're playing the wrong game. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
84
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:04:00 -
[73] - Quote
One of the main reason why EvE is real (and fun) is just because fights are a serious business and losses are "real" (even if in a game setting). And there's no derogation to this, never. Is a conflict simulator not a sport simulator. In EvE setting New Eden people compete over resource, struggle for life, profit, power, politic. There's no "let's frag just for fun".
Same as in real world there's aircraft or navy combat done "just for sport".
Any premade arena type area or mechanic is not only disruptive for the game logic, canons and "culture" but also for the game immersion feeling. |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
117
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:22:00 -
[74] - Quote
just get a corporation and go to low / null. you won't need arenas.
And fair pvp happens only in RTS / FPS games.
And if someone is getting ganked 24/7 he is doing something wrong. I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

AKilla Sunday
Lunar Mining
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:27:00 -
[75] - Quote
Seed markets with POS like shielded modules. Kinda like the warp bubbles but with more diameter. Allow anchoring only in high and make it so that the fuel costs allot, or that the ''arena'' despawns after a given time. Make it so that all pilots wishing to participate on the duel must be in some kind of range of the ''arena'' click some window to agree to duel and with the terms(say - there are 10 ships eligible to fight - agree? .... or something) for the duel to begin.
There is great potential in this(isk sink, fun). All you arena nay sayers think about it.
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
84
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:34:00 -
[76] - Quote
A portable mobile safe area bubble??? Are you serious?
Then why not just some isanced battleground with a queue when one can join and a countdown to start fights. "3, 2, 1... for the horde!"
|

Nessa Aldeen
The Sword and The Shield
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:39:00 -
[77] - Quote
I think what the OP is trying to say is to have a kind of 'Colosseum' in space where you duke it out within fixed parameters and use phrases like 'Are you not entertained?' while gaining money and fame . It could have merit as in real society throughout history, war is war, but duelling for prizes ala Fight Club/UFC could be equally fun and entertaining (like watching 2 guys pummel each other to death for monehs).
In true Eve fashion, it would be costly to lose for the 'gladiator' as well as those who bet - Las Vegas in Space. Think of the gambling options. The word 'Arena' however I hate, because it has connotations of fake pvp seen in mostly crap MMOs like WoW. However, this is far different than anything goes pvp there must be strict regulations otherwise it's rather pointless. It's a different dimension to pvp the way I see it. |

AKilla Sunday
Lunar Mining
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:43:00 -
[78] - Quote
[quote=Sura Sadiva]A portable mobile safe area bubble??? Are you serious?
Then why not just some isanced battleground with a queue when one can join and a countdown to start fights. "3, 2, 1... for the horde!"
[/quote
Because it sounds more real that way. Because there are allot of carebears that would love to blow some of their huge piles of ISK on this but will not otherwise via the low/null route or even high sec wars because of all the blobbing or the high sec shannanigans that the complex system allows. |

AKilla Sunday
Lunar Mining
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:47:00 -
[79] - Quote
Nessa Aldeen wrote: The word 'Arena' however I hate
Yes its a disgusting term by reading it trough the WOW prism i agree.
But intellectuals must talk peasant from time to time when talking about exotic things as these and their universe lacks such concepts. |

Leah Solo
Lag No Use
52
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 12:02:00 -
[80] - Quote
People who want arenas are the same ones who want EVE on easy mode. Cause arranging fights using existent mechanics is too hard. Cause joining RvB is too hard. Cause making 'Arena' corp and arrange fights within is too hard. Cause going on a test server is a mystery. Cause learning the mechanics of lowsec and null, or god forbid learn survival techniques in those areas, to kill and not to be killed is hard. 'What is that you say? Asking that mean piwate who destroyed my ship for some tips? Blasphemy!'
But you are affraid and lazy to do that. So you want your instant gratification arenas. You want your safe environments. You want your easy win button. But basically, what you don't really want is EVE Online. |

AKilla Sunday
Lunar Mining
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 12:27:00 -
[81] - Quote
Kinda like have our cake and eat it.
It's just an idea. And don't blame me for putting it out. For all I care CPP starts treads like these on random alts when something like this is on their drawing board but it's not something terribly popular with the subscribers. How else this got 2 blue responses and a sticker.
And again, how are rich EVE wise pilots gonna blow their, for lack of a better word, MASSIVE piles of isk? I know I rather pay 1.5 cost of my ship or even more to enjoy a fair fight without all the blob, disco camps, alts, neutral alts, station games and the 2 hour roam that ends badly. I am bad at pvp and many more are aswell and are also frustrated about all the above **** that cockblocks our urge to screw with our isk.
But don't take me too serious, I will do the same for you. In the end CPP gives a rats ass about my random thoughts or yours cause all they fundamentally care about is selling monthly for cash and loads of PLEX. There is a huge potential for CCP to achieve that trough this arena concept. Anything else CCP says about eve is politics(just like in politics).
And there is room in between CCP's principles and the WOW and such marked for life people principles for everyone else.
Peace |

Aracimia Wolfe
The Cursed Navy
119
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 12:40:00 -
[82] - Quote
One of my favourite events in Eve was in Nullsec when I was with BDEAL. The Thunderdome!
2 Ship enter 1 Ship leave!
We need more Thunderdomes....... I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

Vol Arm'OOO
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:33:00 -
[83] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
Instead of flat out instanced arenas - what this game needs imo is a system built off of the already existing contract system whereby people can enter into engagements of any size by mutually consent - call it a memorandum of aggression. The way I envision it - if any two people or groups of people want to engage in a fight they should be able to agree to it and there should be a form contract which defines such things as ship types and numbers, systems involved, and time limit of the engagement. There could even be bets built into it - each side puts up a certain amount of isk and based upon the defined win condition, the isk would be claimed at the end of the contest. IMO - the benefit of such a system is that it allows people to engage in voluntary combat without the gimpyness of the war dec and suspect systems while keeping the participants in the eve universe instead of some instance. OFC this being eve, other folk might try to interfere but that is the price of a single universe system. |

Fractal Muse
Dead's Prostitutes Test Friends Please Ignore
83
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:44:00 -
[84] - Quote
If someone wants to start a tournament then they should.
The problem that players run up against is that they start realizing that the logistics of providing a secure environment for a tournament are extremely difficult. You'd have to secure the system and the adjacent systems. If players wanted to watch they'd all have to be in, essentially, shuttles.
Arena guards would have to be ready to pop shuttles that tried to interfere with the contestants.
Contestants themselves would have to either be held on a station, in a POS, or out of system until the time of the match-up.
It could be done now but it would take an awful lot of effort to make it secure.
I wouldn't mind seeing a function in WiS that would allow one to watch a view screen that is linked to some sort of camera drone. In this situation, the logistics for player run tournaments are -much- easier. Have all the viewers in a stations and only worry about the contestants in 0.0 or low sec. You could find a dead-end system, bubble up the corridor, patrol it with scouts, and have retreat locations designated in case someone managed to crash the party. But, it would be far more feasible this way.
Walking in Stations - the possibilities are endless. :)
I don't like any solution that would create 'separate' space for an arena or tournament grounds. With EVE players being EVE players it is almost guaranteed that someone would find a way to 'creatively use' such a space.
I like any effort on CCP's that would encourage and support player initiatives to running such events.
|

Talemecus Valta
The Scope Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:50:00 -
[85] - Quote
Having a seperate Arena system in EVE would defeat the idea of the game.
I've tried one mmo which has arenas in it, and the match was very one sided.
Also there is the logistics of the putting arenas into place if CCP should do this.
For one, there is the programming, CCP would have to do a whole load of programming to implement and effective Arena system that everyone could use.
There is also the matchmaking system, everyone's ships are different, different modules and weapons, unless CCP instigate a ship for ship, module for module system, there will always be a one sided fight somewhere.
Not to mention the servers too, there might be more downtime required to do whatever CCP do, when downtime is running.
The mmo arena I tried connected to a different server, so that could mean CCP having a whole dedicated server to Arenas, and building a server isn't cheap these days.
There a loads more reasons for not to do this idea, and plenty of reasons as to why CCP should.
In the end, it'll be the players choice to go into the Arena or not. Only 40 rounds per gun... I hate reloading in the middle!
I'll make it through each day, Singing DEATH OR GLORY!!!! |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Bitten.
694
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:51:00 -
[86] - Quote
AKilla Sunday wrote:[quote=Sura Sadiva]A portable mobile safe area bubble??? Are you serious?
Then why not just some isanced battleground with a queue when one can join and a countdown to start fights. "3, 2, 1... for the horde!"
[/quote
Because it sounds more real that way. Because there are allot of carebears that would love to blow some of their huge piles of ISK on this but will not otherwise via the low/null route or even high sec wars because of all the blobbing or the high sec shannanigans that the complex system allows.
That's a load of absolute crap and you know it. This group you reference is entirely fictional. They do not exist. There's already a lot of different ways to get pvp, the fact that these people DON'T go out and spend their isk on pvp isn't because the mechanics aren't there, it's because they're pvp averse carebears. There's no point in adding stuff thats only a hairs breadth away from instanced garbage to appease a group that literally doesn't exist |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
258
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:57:00 -
[87] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
I do not see the benefits for eve here. Edit: Except if you make this arena areas gankable...
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Ezri Dax
Infinite Improbability Inc Relativity Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 15:09:00 -
[88] - Quote
every game that has your awesome arena are failed free to play games , swtor , startrek online ,,,,,,,,,
EVE PLAYERS LIKE THERE SANDBOX PVP |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
1022
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 15:19:00 -
[89] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
I must disagree. This idea is without merit because we break the sandbox up into smaller chunks. Here you can do this, there you can do that. It is not player driven despite what is being said to the contrary. it is just creating a safe-haven for PvP, taking it away from areas that matter.
Tournaments run by CCP are a totally different kettle of fish. These are popular, yet rare events in that they do not take place every day. Arena would be like having the Olympics playing every day - dead boring and pointless.
I can think of many more reasons why Arena would be a bad idea and detrimental to this game, but to keep it short, this is all I have to say.
No.
Personnel Division Director --áBene Gesserit Chapterhouse
"The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another." - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Bluetippedflyer
Mafia Redux
31
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 15:27:00 -
[90] - Quote
dear eve:
no arena's, it dumbs down the game
~signed me |

Dewa Cinta
painkiller.
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 15:31:00 -
[91] - Quote
Hmmm, everybody thinks its a bad idea.
Get the hint? |

Theresa Lamont
Rogue Fleet
56
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 16:41:00 -
[92] - Quote
This arena/simulator concept may have a very high potential as a player retention factor (and probably even attraction). I just look at World of Tanks`s "arranged fights" and it seems to have a lot of success. However, what would be the impact in Eve if this would be implemented? What would be the repercussion on Eve`s economy (less real ships being blown up)? How would this affect the number of real "targets" flying around. Roaming gangs will surely have a harder time finding people to shoot at (but do people like to roam in the 1st place or they just want to have a fight?). CCP needs to evaluate this carefully before implementing this.
The idea has its merits and sounds very interesting. To reject it without really considering its impact on the game is not very serious however, I think everyone agrees that a big change like this will have a major impact on the game. Good or bad, it remains to be seen. Also, CCP should not hold itself in undertaking major game changes just because of a significant amount of programming needs to be done. That argument is not a very good one in my opinion. Players, eventually, want to see major changes in "their" game. Small tweaks & improvements (even good) can still, with time, slowly kill your player base. The competition will sooner or later come up with something better then what you are providing. And that is when you will have serious issues in attracting and keeping your players. |

Imports Plus
Brothel of Slating Intellectual Lusts
144
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:02:00 -
[93] - Quote
It is the players job to organize and implement such a thing in the sandbox. These walls and borders and structures you guys keep begging CCP for keep shrinking and shrinking the sandbox. In a perfect game there would be nothing but tools for building and destroying with zero developer content- 100% player created content. Make it so. Take the training wheels off. Ron Paul 2016. |

Arec Bardwin
806
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:15:00 -
[94] - Quote
The day I can grind honor points to spend on special 'arena' pvp gear and compete in the ingame pvp ladder I will cancel all my accounts. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
824
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:16:00 -
[95] - Quote
Arena's.... no thank you!!!!
A mechanic to create a limited engagement between two pilots (and hence 1v1's), HELL YES...
A tool to help create tournaments.... I don't know.... this sounds like arena's to me... Besides, doesn't the test server allow for this?? |

Viktor Fel
Dred Nots
23
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:29:00 -
[96] - Quote
Arenas? What an idiotic idea. Tears, I harvest them. |

bartos100
Living Ghost
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:40:00 -
[97] - Quote
i like the idea of arena's but only if they are owned and run by player corps that way there are still ways to disrupt it :) |

Mathrin
Synthetic Solution Synthetic Systems
8
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:42:00 -
[98] - Quote
Dear lord NO. This goes against everything eve stands for. If you want an area make one yourself (see RVB) |

Sara XIII
The Carnifex Corp
132
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 17:45:00 -
[99] - Quote
Last time I was in an arena I got beat to death by fish wielding rogue.
My self-esteem can't handle another such blow......
No
 Between Ignorance and Wisdom |

baltec1
Bat Country
3337
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:04:00 -
[100] - Quote
Theresa Lamont wrote:
The idea has its merits and sounds very interesting. To reject it without really considering its impact on the game is not very serious however, I think everyone agrees that a big change like this will have a major impact on the game. Good or bad, it remains to be seen.
We have seen what happened in other MMOs. The PVP outside the arena died out in a matter of days because it is so much easier to get fights at the press of a button. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
671
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:11:00 -
[101] - Quote
EVE has an arena, it's called "everywhere but High Sec", y'all should try it sometimes. |

Theresa Lamont
Rogue Fleet
56
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:15:00 -
[102] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: We have seen what happened in other MMOs. The PVP outside the arena died out in a matter of days because it is so much easier to get fights at the press of a button.
Highly possible. You have examples? |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2140
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:20:00 -
[103] - Quote
Theresa Lamont wrote:baltec1 wrote: We have seen what happened in other MMOs. The PVP outside the arena died out in a matter of days because it is so much easier to get fights at the press of a button. Highly possible. You have examples? I quit it by the time they introduced arenas, but I've heard about it: Runescape. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

cBOLTSON
Star Frontiers THORN Alliance
102
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:26:00 -
[104] - Quote
I agree. I mean like you said people are already trying to game the system to achieve this. You also have entities like RvB which sort of make arenas.
Thing is EVE is meant to be a living breathing universe. Why would they not have televised matches. Make it an isk sink, entertainment as well as a prestigious thing to have. You could have a 'top 10' like you do with the bounty system. "Were not elitists, were just tired of fail" - The Sorn |

Cynthia Gallente
Bio's Holdings Bio's Remnant.
858
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:26:00 -
[105] - Quote
Toshiroma McDiesel wrote:Phil Da Agony wrote:YEAH! Put arenas and let us bet ISK there, but please, the fights will involve only npc ships.
Ty CCP. Again, this is something that can be set up and run completely by players. (and the chances for meta gaming would be interesting)  This is the best post in this whole thread, why are people overlooking this? Post with your lickGäó |

Tribunia
Ducks of Death
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:37:00 -
[106] - Quote
I dont like the term "arena" and it shouldnt only be for the pleasure of the involved parties only. If this thing is going into the game it needs to be packaged as some sort of sport that you can place bets on and earn ISK.
I m also for other in-game sports for betting, whatever they might be. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
216
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:39:00 -
[107] - Quote
OMG, how about resilience? And some pillars? Also put resilience in!
/facepalm If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

highonpop
Eve Liberation Force Fatal Ascension
407
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 18:49:00 -
[108] - Quote
Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies. You do realize it's dead in EVE too? An Arena wouldn't stop the T1 Industrial farming at low sec bottlenecks or PvE fit kill mails in anoms. Outside of those and random roaming kills, there is no PvP in EVE.
not to be mean.
but you're an idiot
pvp is dead?
do you follow eve-kill.net?
do you follow battleclinic's killboard?
pvp is alive and well. just because you can't think outside the box you've put your small brain inside, doesn't mean pvp is dead.
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/Very%20best%20of%20Makalu%20Zarya
R.I.P Vile Rat http://evemaps.dotlan.net/live/Outpost/Rename/2012-09-12 |

baltec1
Bat Country
3338
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 19:18:00 -
[109] - Quote
Theresa Lamont wrote:baltec1 wrote: We have seen what happened in other MMOs. The PVP outside the arena died out in a matter of days because it is so much easier to get fights at the press of a button. Highly possible. You have examples? Restus in SWG. The moment it hit pvp everywhere else died.
|

Anemonae Ambrosia
Royal Order of Security Specialists Late Night Alliance
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 20:01:00 -
[110] - Quote
Instead of the OPs idea how about you just allow two pilots to willing enter a Limited Engagement with the same rules as now for the LE. Then let the players take that and turn it into whatever they want. RvB didn't kill PvP, can flipping for 1v1s didn't kill PvP, so this won't. It will just be another tool in the sandbox we can use to do some new things |

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
177
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 20:08:00 -
[111] - Quote
In my opinion, the very next (small) step after creating dedicated PvP "Arena's" in hi-sec, is having PvP ONLY in said "Arena's."
Also, in my opinion, there is a whole world of PvP to be had; just find yourself a low-sec gate and enjoy. I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

Viktor Fel
Dred Nots
23
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 20:40:00 -
[112] - Quote
PvP is very easy to find in EVE. It is an ideal sandbox for it in fact. I do not believe that segregated arenas are an answer or should even be entertained. Some one mentioned SWGs' fail in this regard and it is true. One could also mentio nthe lameness of LOTROs' PVP system as an example of how arena stuff is pretty much fail. Tears, I harvest them. |

Nytak
Ivar School of Galactic Brotherhood
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 21:12:00 -
[113] - Quote
Arenas in EVE??
Man, never thought I'd be offering this kinda advice but...
WOW is -------------------------------> That'a'way |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
204
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 21:43:00 -
[114] - Quote
Hell no!
I might support some light game support for player run events (like an "arena" can that marks players who have left a certain boundary), but totally taking the risk away? It would cheapen the game greatly. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1942
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 21:51:00 -
[115] - Quote
Nytak wrote:Arenas in EVE??
Man, never thought I'd be offering this kinda advice but...
WOW is -------------------------------> That'a'way Grinding PvP in WOW arenas, cold and harsh. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Kalissis
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:30:00 -
[116] - Quote
Arenas will break Eve and harm it even more as titan bridges and passive income (tech) do/did.
Simple solution to more fun pvp: remove titan bridges and passive income --> DONE! Eve will be alive again. |

Pretty GuyYeah
67
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:33:00 -
[117] - Quote
We need a battleground queue, so we can queue up anywhere. Then we enter the fight and take a break from missions, etc, and when it's over we respawn in warp where we entered the queue. We don't lose our ship of course! 
Splendid idea, +1! Post with your main.
A legend walks among us, a genius so significant he so dares to degrade himself as camouflage when you dispute. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
785
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:38:00 -
[118] - Quote
A R E N A was a horrible combination of letters to use.
Stop thinking WoW battleground guys.
Think sanctioned fights that you can bet on and watch. The EVE tournaments, but with more player control.
Stop thinking WoW and think EVE. |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
118
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:40:00 -
[119] - Quote
ccp could implement a tetris or farmville clone that could be played on the widescreens in stations .... I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
37
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:56:00 -
[120] - Quote
The reason I think this would work, and even help the game:
Currently, the people sitting around waiting to gank suspects are not looking for 1 vs 1, they are looking for ganks.
Most of the suspects are now simply trying to use the system to gain a 1 vs 1, that thinks he has help...and doesn't....
And this is EvE, combat takes many forms in EVE, I doubt this would have an effect on any of them.
The only thing Arenas would be provide for is honor duels, where the players set the rules, and no outside interference is possible. Add to that a betting mini-game, that involves the community, and I think it would help the provide a more cohesive highsec experience in the long run. Low sec and 0.0 each have their own set of rules, and don't need or want an Arena. This is about High-sec, and the long term evolution of the game. Lowsec and 0.0 people constantly complain about wanting more people to come to 0.0, why not introduce a vanilla version of small pvp to Highsec, get them to watch it, and maybe get involved themselves.....wouldn't this be a win for all secs?
To be perfectly honest, I don't know that I would use an Arena that much, but I would certainly bet on the battles.
|

Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
4031
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:59:00 -
[121] - Quote
Just spilling my brain all over the table in an effort to figure out under which circumstances..let's call it "price-fighting"... would work.
1. No physical system. It's the friggin future, it should be a virtual reality- make it look cool, like the Tron world.
2. No existing ships. We don't want to obsolete "real" pvp. Instead, maybe 4 or 5 different special "arena-frigates" that do not exist in the "real" eve world. They should have a fixed fitting, you can only chose the complete ships, you cannot change the modules (once again, real pvp should be much more challenging and complex than pricefights).
3. Let other players watch and place bets...this is the point that I like the most. -.- |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4508
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 22:59:00 -
[122] - Quote
Luke Visteen wrote:ccp could implement a tetris or farmville clone that could be played on the widescreens in stations ....
I just open my IGB and play Lemmings! 
http://www.elizium.nu/scripts/lemmings/ "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1968
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 23:58:00 -
[123] - Quote
I really think a combat simulator as an extension of the fitting tool would be epic.
Don't think of it as replacing PVP, as we could not expect some kind of rating system (though a record would be great for players looking to join corps and show that while lacking "real" combat experience they know how to fly their ship) .
Yes there are a lot of "Fitaholics" out there who might never be fleet fodder again, nor get blobbed in nullsec from that day forward as they constantly work out their ship fittings in the sim. I can even see the siim get used the way we use a FPS game.
But this grindforISK->Lose Ship->grindforISK->Lose Ship thing is not really good for retention.
PVP in this game reminds me of a Disney ride, waiting half an afternoon for a ride that lasts minutes.
But we should think of the new players at least. Not everybody has their own POS/Clone vat with fitted ships lined up - effectively treating their hangar like a respawn point.
Ah well. We're all just playing pickup sticks with our butts discussing this anyway.
|

KatanTharkay
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:01:00 -
[124] - Quote
No need for arenas as long as you have something like RVB.  But it would be awesome if CCP would allow corps within an alliance declare war on each other. We could see the rise of many PVP schools and sporting systems. |

Deadly Denali
Shogun's Samurai Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:20:00 -
[125] - Quote
I say no, that is not what EVE is about. Try null or low sec. |

Slash Harnet
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:29:00 -
[126] - Quote
I don't know, eve hunger games could be pretty fun watch. Lock 12 teams of two in a single system. No cloaking. Last team standing wins. I'd PAY to watch it even. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
87
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:31:00 -
[127] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote: The only thing Arenas would be provide for is honor duels, where the players set the rules, and no outside interference is possible.
The point is just... we don't want to live in a universe where there conflics evolve in "honor duels". Enforcing it by mechanics you ruin our game experience, you destroy the harsh and cold beauty of New Eden, you turn it in (oh my God another one!) Camelot.
Beside there're already player driven event like that. And yes, moslty pirates group run and host them. And yes, requires effort to host them, organization, territorial control and so on. They do, they deal with the related problems. Why their work and effort (perfectly coerent with Eve spirit) have to be ******??
Lord Wiggin wrote: This is about High-sec, and the long term evolution of the game. Lowsec and 0.0 people constantly complain about wanting more people to come to 0.0, why not introduce a vanilla version of small pvp to Highsec, get them to watch it, and maybe get involved themselves.....wouldn't this be a win for all secs?
And please, stop to always talk about high sec people like they were some kind of ****** always in need of some specific game mechanics to do anything:
"ah no but we have to change this to allow high sec people to do that" "we need to introduce this new mechanics cause they're idiots and couldn't do it" "here a special rule is needed for them retards"
... and so on.... Is not so, they're players abel to deal with EvE game settings like anyone else.
It's one single shard and one single universe, the same for all of us.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1944
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 00:54:00 -
[128] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:And please, stop to always talk about high sec people like they were some kind of subnormal always in need of some specific game mechanics to do anything:
"ah no but we have to change this to allow high sec people to do that" "we need to introduce this new mechanics cause they're idiots and couldn't do it" "here a special rule is needed for them retards"
... and so on.... Is not so, they're players abel to deal with EvE game settings like anyone else. No, not really.... we need some CCP help to remove those damn gankers. And bumpers. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

ISVRaDa
Iberians Iberians.
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 01:11:00 -
[129] - Quote
Just one pilot stats doing small gang pvp (not lemmings fleet battles);
December, 312 kills November, 404 kills October, 314 kills September, 238 kills August, 266kills July, 300 kills
PvP is dead... cool story. Immortality is only a word. All that exists can die. Every living thing has a weapon against which it has no defense. Time. Disease. Iron. Guilt.
-+ What can change the nature of a man ? |

AKilla Sunday
Lunar Mining
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 04:46:00 -
[130] - Quote
It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. Fact is you will still catch the same amount of PVE ships at gates or trough probing, same amount of industrial ships, nothing is going away if this is introduced, all the PVP that is sought after just by one side will still be there. The ones that roam low/null now will roam after such a feature is introduced just like someone above pointed out happened after RvB and such.
Only thing missing is how it should be delivered. I am certain CCP will not release (if it ever comes to this) something that is as efficient as bounties where pre - Retribution.
- Risk free? hell no - 2 teams of 1 or more pilots each enters means there will be survivors only on one side if any(this is the hardest thing to implement I guess). - No ranking system - this went out of fashion same time with powdered wigs - Make the amount of isk required to start such a fixed match substantial enough as to encourage players to look at it mostly as an expensive training ground and make costs grow exponentially in relation to the number of ships involved in the brawl -Make a betting system so involved parties or outside ones may bet on the outcome(also tax it) -The loosing part should pay maybe a fee to the KSCO - Keep Space Clean Organization -Create a wining terms set of rules with many options available(I haven't thought of any beside blow the other guy out of the sky) -Make people register with Concord for a fee for a "gladiator" (I know I know) license -Make so that this feature is only available in high and if any module(if any) should be necessary it only comes in a high sec version - If a pilots corp is in a war either prevent them from participating in such matches or allow the pilots from the opposite side of the war to enter the fighting area and attack their WT's -Profit...? |

TharOkha
0asis Group
206
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 05:17:00 -
[131] - Quote
Usagi Toshiro wrote: To play devils advocate; maybe a system like this would encourage some carebears to try their hand in low/null sec after a few victories?
Of course it would. But there are a bunch of players that constantly whine about how low/null is empty, but when some proposal is spoken, they are againist it. GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 05:31:00 -
[132] - Quote
Usagi Toshiro wrote:Ocih wrote:Red Teufel wrote:it's called lowsec and 0.0. try it sometime. I think he wants PvP where he isn't being jumped by the gank-alot bear every time. To play devils advocate; maybe a system like this would encourage some carebears to try their hand in low/null sec after a few victories? Or maybe change FW so it is more even and presents less risk.
Not a fan of arenas in PvP games. My vote would be no and I am hardly a leet, blob ganker. |

Eternal Error
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
160
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 06:40:00 -
[133] - Quote
no. |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Bitten.
698
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 07:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
AKilla Sunday wrote: It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. Fact is you will still catch the same amount of PVE ships at gates or trough probing, same amount of industrial ships, nothing is going away if this is introduced, all the PVP that is sought after just by one side will still be there. The ones that roam low/null now will roam after such a feature is introduced just like someone above pointed out happened after RvB and such.
Only thing missing is how it should be delivered. I am certain CCP will not release (if it ever comes to this) something that is as efficient as bounties where pre - Retribution.
- Risk free? hell no - 2 teams of 1 or more pilots each enters means there will be survivors only on one side if any(this is the hardest thing to implement I guess). - No ranking system - this went out of fashion same time with powdered wigs - Make the amount of isk required to start such a fixed match substantial enough as to encourage players to look at it mostly as an expensive training ground and make costs grow exponentially in relation to the number of ships involved in the brawl -Make a betting system so involved parties or outside ones may bet on the outcome(also tax it) -The loosing part should pay maybe a fee to the KSCO - Keep Space Clean Organization -Create a wining terms set of rules with many options available(I haven't thought of any beside blow the other guy out of the sky) -Make people register with Concord for a fee for a "gladiator" (I know I know) license -Make so that this feature is only available in high and if any module(if any) should be necessary it only comes in a high sec version - If a pilots corp is in a war either prevent them from participating in such matches or allow the pilots from the opposite side of the war to enter the fighting area and attack their WT's -Profit...?
It's funny how the two people in favour of it refuse to acknowledge that there are already a lot of different ways to get pvp, or simply refuse to do it and want a more easy, consequence free version of PVP on their own personal terms.
That is not how EVE works.
Go play one of those other dead MMOs like swtor
|

Thgil Goldcore
Advenus Classem
399
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 07:41:00 -
[135] - Quote
Eve way for arenas...
Allow a way to have legal PVP without wardec... With the safety system currently in place simply have a setting that makes you a legal target without criminal flag. Its simple and easy and effortless to implement.
With that in place, players can form their own arenas, their own rules, and everything else. This way its entirely player driven and loaded with the possibility for betrayal and scams that make eve so delicious! |

baltec1
Bat Country
3345
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:01:00 -
[136] - Quote
AKilla Sunday wrote: It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. No we don't like it because arenas have killed the pvp outside of them in every game they were put into. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1443
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:19:00 -
[137] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:AKilla Sunday wrote: It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. No we don't like it because arenas have killed the pvp outside of them in every game they were put into. Where do you think the people that suggest these awful ideas came from. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1171
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:23:00 -
[138] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
As long as everything that is destroyed is from the live economy, I don't see a problem with it.
In fact, it would open up a new official career path, The Bookie. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2323
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:27:00 -
[139] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. As long as everything that is destroyed is from the live economy, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it would open up a new official career path, The Bookie. And if the money is controlled by players, such an idea would be cast aside as another 'don't do - it's a scam' and be another broken/dead mechanic.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1171
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:30:00 -
[140] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Zagdul wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. As long as everything that is destroyed is from the live economy, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it would open up a new official career path, The Bookie. And if the money is controlled by players, such an idea would be cast aside as another 'don't do - it's a scam' and be another broken/dead mechanic.
Quite possibly, but isn't that kind of the point to this game? Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3346
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:32:00 -
[141] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
However, the difference between this game and every other game out there is that the ships taken into these arenas give you an advantage based on how much isk you spend. If the Arena were setup where all ships/mods/implants were from the economy, it would actually encourage war in EVE simply due to the value of the stuff being blown up.
Every other game also runs on taking in the most expensive purple gear... |

Mike Adoulin
Trans-Aerospace Industries
80
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:33:00 -
[142] - Quote
*shrugs*
Dunno what an 'arena' is in all those other games, but a system where you could challenge someone to a duel (1v1) in highsec would be interesting.
Treat it the exact same way as a convo request. It costs ISK to initiate the challenge, and you can set the amount for someone to challenge you. Just like a convo request, you can decline or decline and block (altho I love the idea of setting the challenge amount at max and seeing if somebody is dumb enough to keep challenging you to a duel....)
If you accept, you and the other guy are immediately Blue-Flagged (Limited Engagement) to each other on a 15 minutes start timer. And the fights on.
Minimal change to the game coding for CCP, and if you lose, you have just lost your ship and maybe your pod too. And no insurance payout, buddy...you chose to participate in this fight, remember?
And yeah, to keep things spicy, 'neutral' repping is allowed (altho they would get sucked into the fight as well...or even better, make the reppers get Suspect flags and go blinky yellow. Yeah, thats even better.).
So there is still a chance your opponent might 'cheat', at a possible cost to his accomplices...just how much do you like So-and-so, anyway? Enough to risk your expensive logi ship?
|

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1171
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:33:00 -
[143] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
However, the difference between this game and every other game out there is that the ships taken into these arenas give you an advantage based on how much isk you spend. If the Arena were setup where all ships/mods/implants were from the economy, it would actually encourage war in EVE simply due to the value of the stuff being blown up.
Every other game also runs on taking in the most expensive purple gear...
However, that 'Purple Gear" isn't destroyed when your match is over. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2323
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:34:00 -
[144] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Zagdul wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. As long as everything that is destroyed is from the live economy, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it would open up a new official career path, The Bookie. And if the money is controlled by players, such an idea would be cast aside as another 'don't do - it's a scam' and be another broken/dead mechanic. Quite possibly, but isn't that kind of the point to this game? edit: people still use the contract system and for the most part, even with all the safeguards CCP has put in place, people still scam with it, people fall for them and it's still used. To have developers waste time on a new game mechanic that never gets used? No thanks. I said earlier that there most likely is a list of must and must not do for 'arenas' and if they can't be followed there is absolutely zero point in wasting time when CCP can spend that time fixing lag... er, I mean other stuff.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:36:00 -
[145] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Zagdul wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Zagdul wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. As long as everything that is destroyed is from the live economy, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it would open up a new official career path, The Bookie. And if the money is controlled by players, such an idea would be cast aside as another 'don't do - it's a scam' and be another broken/dead mechanic. Quite possibly, but isn't that kind of the point to this game? edit: people still use the contract system and for the most part, even with all the safeguards CCP has put in place, people still scam with it, people fall for them and it's still used. To have developers waste time on a new game mechanic that never gets used? No thanks. I said earlier that there most likely is a list of must and must not do for 'arenas' and if they can't be followed there is absolutely zero point in wasting time when CCP can spend that time fixing lag... er, I mean other stuff.
I know you're trolling now.
Because, CCP would NEVER work on game mechanics we'd never use... ever.
Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3347
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:38:00 -
[146] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
However, that 'Purple Gear" isn't destroyed when your match is over.
Dosn't matter, the same would happen here. Arenas will kill pvp here as it has done in every single other game it has been added to. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:42:00 -
[147] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
However, that 'Purple Gear" isn't destroyed when your match is over.
Dosn't matter, the same would happen here. Arenas will kill pvp here as it has done in every single other game it has been added to.
The point you still miss is that when ships go into the arena, they're purchased from the work of the people in the economy.
The other games you discuss, the gear is earned from tokens which are earned via 'grinding' which then gets segregated off into a PVP aspect of the game which is separate gear, mechanics and economy. The one single saving grace to this actually functioning in EVE where it would have a different effect is that all of those aspects share a symbiotic relationship in EVE.
If you blow up a ship in an Arena, some dude who built that ship and those mods made isk off it.
This is unique to EVE.
Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2323
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:45:00 -
[148] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
However, that 'Purple Gear" isn't destroyed when your match is over.
Dosn't matter, the same would happen here. Arenas will kill pvp here as it has done in every single other game it has been added to. The point you still miss is that when ships go into the arena, they're purchased from the work of the people in the economy. The other games you discuss, the gear is earned from tokens which are earned via 'grinding' which then gets segregated off into a PVP aspect of the game which is separate gear, mechanics and economy. The one single saving grace to this actually functioning in EVE where it would have a different effect is that all of those aspects share a symbiotic relationship in EVE. If you blow up a ship in an Arena, some dude who built that ship and those mods made isk off it. This is unique to EVE. Another aspect of an EVE arena that would have to be in order for it to work. What goes in is 100% player made, no fake ships and stuff.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Ur235
FATAL Warfare Reckless Faith
54
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:48:00 -
[149] - Quote
Stupid idea if people could enter arenas and fight instead of roaming to find fights then it would be the end of 90% of all roams because hardly anyone would bother going on a roam if they can get an instant fights in some arena, and space would become even emptier than it is now hmm |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:49:00 -
[150] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Zagdul wrote:baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
However, that 'Purple Gear" isn't destroyed when your match is over.
Dosn't matter, the same would happen here. Arenas will kill pvp here as it has done in every single other game it has been added to. The point you still miss is that when ships go into the arena, they're purchased from the work of the people in the economy. The other games you discuss, the gear is earned from tokens which are earned via 'grinding' which then gets segregated off into a PVP aspect of the game which is separate gear, mechanics and economy. The one single saving grace to this actually functioning in EVE where it would have a different effect is that all of those aspects share a symbiotic relationship in EVE. If you blow up a ship in an Arena, some dude who built that ship and those mods made isk off it. This is unique to EVE. Another aspect of an EVE arena that would have to be in order for it to work. What goes in is 100% player made, no fake ships and stuff.
Pretty much.
If they make this separate from the economy then it won't work.
Yes, there will be a lot of people complaining that "he can buy GTC to gain an advantage" etc etc etc... CCP jsut needs to take a line that you can have just as much as that person, they just get to participate more often.
That or win a few and make the money behind them so they fund themselves. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:51:00 -
[151] - Quote
Ur235 wrote:Stupid idea if people could enter arenas and fight instead of roaming to find fights then it would be the end of 90% of all roams because hardly anyone would bother going on a roam if they can get an instant fights in some arena, and space would become even emptier than it is now
You're wrong.
Where would the people get the ships that go into the arena from?
Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1172
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:52:00 -
[152] - Quote
The big misconception that I've seen repeated throughout this thread is "risk-free".
There is absolute risk. We're a single shard, your name is out there to be shamed. It's not like you can transfer servers.
Your isk goes into these tournaments, if you don't win them then you dump a ton of isk into something that you lose money on to get nowhere.
However, if you're really good at it and play the meta game properly. You can win tournaments, make money and enjoy the e-peen factor.
The fact is, EVE needs a draw for players to come in and have a board to compete on. A gladiator arena would introduce so many facets to this sandbox which allow us to interact with that it is actually a feasible game concept for EVE. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3347
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:53:00 -
[153] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
This is unique to EVE.
So we end up with a slightly unique arena. Still doesnt change the outcome for the rest of the PVP out there, EVE arenas will kill it just as effectivly as the arenas in all those other games. |

baltec1
Bat Country
3347
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:54:00 -
[154] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
You're wrong.
Where would the people get the ships that go into the arena from?
Same place as they do now. From grinding up isk in pve and buying them from industrialists. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2323
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:56:00 -
[155] - Quote
Ur235 wrote:Stupid idea if people could enter arenas and fight instead of roaming to find fights then it would be the end of 90% of all roams because hardly anyone would bother going on a roam if they can get an instant fights in some arena, and space would become even emptier than it is now I understand what you are saying, I really do. What you need to realize that a vast majority of players are risk adverse if they have the means to do so. With so many ways to gather all the intel you need about anyone and anywhere in a matter of seconds, things results in stand offs and 'blue balls'.
Everyone wants to win and when fights already have a winner declared before the first bullet is fired; why bother engaging in the first place if you know you will lose?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

TriadSte
IronPig Sev3rance
139
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:56:00 -
[156] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
I think the format needs changing though as in the ability to ban certain ships is hilarious thats a bit like Mike Tyson banning a heavy weight boxer from fighting him.
It should be simply made to be ship class Vs ship class or similar.
LETS GET IT OOOOOOOOOOOOOOON
|

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 09:58:00 -
[157] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
This is unique to EVE.
So we end up with a slightly unique arena. Still doesnt change the outcome for the rest of the PVP out there, EVE arenas will kill it just as effectivly as the arenas in all those other games.
Again, you're wrong.
The people in the Arenas need to get their ships from somewhere. Ambitious alliance/corps/The Wiz, harvest these materials to build these ships/mods/wtf ever. This puts people in space who don't care about the "arena" and continue on with their daily life like a good citizen of New Eden.
These alliance/people create targets for the game to go fight. In fact, if EVE were more competitive, it'd draw more targets to shoot at.
With this game being on a single shard, single economy it makes it unique from any other game out there. The effects of an arena on EVE cannot be compared to other games because there's no game out there who can currently provide a model for basis. You or I don't truly know what the effect would be on EVE, we can only speculate. However, if your speculation is based on how they've effected other games then you are being ignorant disparity between EVE and every other game out there. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3347
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:03:00 -
[158] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:The people in the Arenas need to get their ships from somewhere.
They get them from industialists like my alt. People who have no need to go blow up other people to build ships and mods. |

Colonel Xaven
Decadence. RAZOR Alliance
205
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:03:00 -
[159] - Quote
I am strictly against a model that extracts PvP activities from the current sandbox all-in-one-universe.
www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:03:00 -
[160] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
You're wrong.
Where would the people get the ships that go into the arena from?
Same place as they do now. From grinding up isk in pve and buying them from industrialists.
Exactly... heh, you mean the targets who are currently widely available for all of us to shoot at? Who are the biggest draw for small gang engagements (home def etc.). You don't see this increasing by introducing more people who want to compete in EVE, thus drawing more industrialists to mine?
Opening up opportunities such as...
Suicide gankng the people harvesting the minerals (but with more targets). The ratters saving up to get into the solo arena (but, more of these now). The line member defending his alliance who controls moons, to feed the modules that go into the arena. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:07:00 -
[161] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:The people in the Arenas need to get their ships from somewhere. They get them from industialists like my alt. People who have no need to go blow up other people to build ships and mods.
The point is: Your alt is in space, it's a valid target.
Just because 10 dudes are duking it out in an arena doesn't detract from the other... what 30k dudes logged in right now?
In fact, it draws people to EVE to potentially draw the 30k up to 40-50-6... etc. The more people on the server = more targets. Right now, EVE has no draw to bring in more targets.
Arena works for EVE. As it stands, it's Arenas or WiS for a 'big draw' to get people to play. Of those two, which would you rather have? Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3347
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:12:00 -
[162] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
Exactly... heh, you mean the targets who are currently widely available for all of us to shoot at? Who are the biggest draw for small gang engagements (home def etc.). You don't see this increasing by introducing more people who want to compete in EVE, thus drawing more industrialists to mine?
Opening up opportunities such as...
Suicide gankng the people harvesting the minerals (but with more targets). The ratters saving up to get into the solo arena (but, more of these now). The line member defending his alliance who controls moons, to feed the modules that go into the arena.
Firstly, I have an industry alt and in the past year of daily trips to and from jita I have been attacked exactly zero times.
Secondly, you do not find all that many industrial targets out in null or lowsec
And thirdly, when we go roaming we want a fight, not ratters hiding in their POS.
Arenas will destroy the pvp out there because it is so much easyer to push a button to get action rather than hunting for it. The more people that use it the less you will find inthe rest of EVE which means more will join the arena and we quickly end up with the arena and nothing else.
It has happened every single time in every game that hasadded an arena. I do not want that to happen here too. |

baltec1
Bat Country
3348
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:16:00 -
[163] - Quote
Zagdul wrote: As it stands, it's Arenas or WiS for a 'big draw' to get people to play. Of those two, which would you rather have?
Neither. I will take what CCP are giving us right now with ship rebalances, bounty system, FW and the upcoming POS and moon goo changes. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:33:00 -
[164] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Zagdul wrote:
Exactly... heh, you mean the targets who are currently widely available for all of us to shoot at? Who are the biggest draw for small gang engagements (home def etc.). You don't see this increasing by introducing more people who want to compete in EVE, thus drawing more industrialists to mine?
Opening up opportunities such as...
Suicide gankng the people harvesting the minerals (but with more targets). The ratters saving up to get into the solo arena (but, more of these now). The line member defending his alliance who controls moons, to feed the modules that go into the arena.
Firstly, I have an industry alt and in the past year of daily trips to and from jita I have been attacked exactly zero times. Secondly, you do not find all that many industrial targets out in null or lowsec And thirdly, when we go roaming we want a fight, not ratters hiding in their POS. Arenas will destroy the pvp out there because it is so much easyer to push a button to get action rather than hunting for it. The more people that use it the less you will find inthe rest of EVE which means more will join the arena and we quickly end up with the arena and nothing else. It has happened every single time in every game that hasadded an arena. I do not want that to happen here too. In EVE, the battle grounds are where you pick a region, the 'world pvp' is when you undock. A gladiator arena of some form in EVE is missing. People need that level of completion, the ability to say "I'm the best".
Lets face it, it's going to happen eventually as there are far more pros in CCP's benefit than cons. Instead of rejecting the idea of an arena, develop it so it would work. For example, an arena you log in and queue up for would probably be bad.
On the other hand, if I could schedule a day next week for my team to go play a match that is publicized in a controlled arena with CCP officiators governing the match, I see an environment worthy of EVE online. Something that isn't like other Arenas.
Other games segregated off the PVP completely which killed the 'world pvp'. It had nothing to do with Arenas. When things like instanced PVP battlegrounds such as the ones in WOW, or the other billion clones who copied did it, they did it wrong simply on the segregation concept. Think about what the effect was of the Arena on those games. Two things I can see that caused the decline in all other PVP in other games were:
1. No destructible consumables in the arena. This KILLED other games because the people who ply the PVE aspects of the game had no reason to continue on in the regular 'world'. There was no reason for them to leave a city. PVE'ers logged in, chatted, go to 'raid/fleet/wtf ever" then logged out. PVP, sat in a city and never left while waiting for their queue window to pop up.
2. Multiple Servers With EVE being a single shard, if you win, you're the winner for the whole game, not just a realm. This gives people bragging rights, e-peen factor and competition that EVE is obviously wanting due to the sheer popularity of the Alliance Tournament.
My friends who can't stand playing EVE watch the Alliance Tournaments that go on. They however don't like EVE because in order to get a fight, I need to make a fleet, go on a roam for 4 hours and MAYBE I'll get a kill. Lets face it, EVE is VERY slow paced. This is fine for the vet or for people who are here for the niche genre.
This being a niche game, it's attracted a lot of people who don't ever want any aspect of it to ever change or evolve. It's rather closed minded. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

baltec1
Bat Country
3348
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:40:00 -
[165] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:
This being a niche game, it's attracted a lot of people who don't ever want any aspect of it to ever change or evolve. It's rather closed minded.
Its why EVE is the only MMO to still be growing after 10 years. We don't do what everyone else does and that is why EVE works.
SWG did not segregate off its PVP from the rest of the world and still all other pvp outside of restus died off. Arenas are simply not compatible with EVE and offer nothing good for us. If you want to hold an event then use the tools we have right now. |

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace That Red Alliance
221
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 10:55:00 -
[166] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
If you want this, go out and make it.
THAT is the point of eve.
Find a place where you can organize 1 vs 1 fights (low? NPC 0.0? WH?) Take bets on the people, then work out what you want to take as the cut.
this isn't WoW, CCP shouldn't be setting this up for you |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
88
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 11:05:00 -
[167] - Quote
AKilla Sunday wrote: It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. Fact is you will still catch the same amount of PVE ships at gates or trough probing, same amount of industrial ships, nothing is going away if this is introduced, all the PVP that is sought after just by one side will still be there. The ones that roam low/null now will roam after such a feature is introduced just like someone above pointed out happened after RvB and such.
This is false. For instance I'm getting gasnked mostly. Is not this. People adverse to this kind of idea are simply EvE players, experienced enough to know or to feel as this kind of restricted/protected so-called PvP is disruptive for the the single-shard sandbox model and is against EvE background, lore, settings and nature.
Having abstract random ideas is easy (PvP arenas, genial! none thought to it before) but one should keep in count the settings of the game, their history and the playerbase background.
As well as this continuosly demanding to rewrite/modify core mechanics to adapt to players too lazy to play the game as it is is becoming annoying and not productive at all.
Is like a guy going to a vegetarian restaurant and ordering a steak:
"Sorry Sir, we do not serve meat here, it's a vegetarian restaurant" "oh, why not? I don't understand, why don't yuou serve meat? I want a steak, you should change"
|

Nalha Saldana
Syneptics Inc. AL3XAND3R.
362
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 11:05:00 -
[168] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run.
I do agree that there is a problem with adding this in EvE but if you look at other great esports games they all have some kind of rated league system where all people can play every day and then the biggest ones meet up in the organized tournaments and those draw more audience because of the league that others do play in.
I think that if EvE is supposed to have a esports value then you need organized arenas that run all the time with a rating system that everyone can see.
Should we have esports in EvE tho? I'm not so sure its a good idea.. |

Colonel Xaven
Decadence. RAZOR Alliance
206
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 11:33:00 -
[169] - Quote
Nalha Saldana wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. I do agree that there is a problem with adding this in EvE but if you look at other great esports games they all have some kind of rated league system where all people can play every day and then the biggest ones meet up in the organized tournaments and those draw more audience because of the league that others do play in. I think that if EvE is supposed to have a esports value then you need organized arenas that run all the time with a rating system that everyone can see. Should we have esports in EvE tho? I'm not so sure its a good idea..
On another server it would be doable. But not in the "real" EvE I assume. But again, that would kinda "extract" the pvp activities out of the sandbox.
www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance |

Shajden
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 11:35:00 -
[170] - Quote
Luis Graca wrote:If people actually want that they just need to create a chat channel to arrange fights, and i'm only say because i have no idea on how the RvB thing ended
RvB is alive and well. And usually a very good chance to find 1vs1. The fleet fights in there are usually balanced between the 2 fc's aswell so properly the closest thing you can come to arena. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
88
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 11:44:00 -
[171] - Quote
Shajden wrote:well. And usually a very good chance to find 1vs1. The fleet fights in there are usually balanced between the 2 fc's aswell so properly the closest thing you can come to arena.
You guys will be the first victims of an embended arena system. Years of players driven gameplay and effort just trashed. And then the rest.
|

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
496
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 12:11:00 -
[172] - Quote
I don't really like this idea, if there was arena pvp in place I doubt I'd ever undock for solo roaming anymore.
I already switched to FW partly because it massively reduces the time necessary to find "fair" fights, if arenas would cut that time down to virtually zero I'd certainly make extensive use of them (at the expense of all other areas of the game).
I don't agree with Zagdul's argument that farmers would still lead to fights - farming in 0.0 is barely worthwhile in terms of risk vs reward, most 0.0 players I know earn their living in the safety of high-sec.
Disrupting an enemies' income is generally not the reason for taking out a roam, if you want to do that (and that is only really possible for terrible pets and renters as everyone else had to tick a "self-sufficient" box on application and doesn't rely on 0.0 for personal income) you use cloakies and covert drops. Similarly you post a home defense fleet because you like pvp, not because you actually want to defend your income streams. Putting up a fight only attracts more roaming gangs to your territory whereas blueballing will usually make the roamers disperse after 5-15 minutes.
I think that the introduction of arenas would lead to a lot less roaming by solo players and small gangs. It would also massively change the skills that are important in EVE pvp - currently the skills of finding a suitable target (reading the map, dscan, splitting enemies, assessing the strength of your targets, ...) are at least as important as the actual combat skills itself. That part of the game would mostly vanish if small-scale pvp was moved to arenas. I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Leah Solo
Lag No Use
55
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 12:22:00 -
[173] - Quote
Zagdul wrote: A gladiator arena of some form in EVE is missing. People need that level of completion, the ability to say "I'm the best".
Yes, for the ones that wish to track their pvp prowess, there is a thing called killboard. You can even api verify it.
Quote:Lets face it, it's going to happen eventually as there are far more pros in CCP's benefit than cons. No it's not..cause there are obviously more cons. As was being stated numerous times already.
Quote:My friends who can't stand playing EVE watch the Alliance Tournaments that go on. They however don't like EVE That's ok..I enjoy watching parkour on youtube, but don't enjoy practicing it. Not everything is for everyone. So..your point?
Quote:because in order to get a fight, I need to make a fleet, go on a roam for 4 hours and MAYBE I'll get a kill. Lets face it, EVE is VERY slow paced. This is fine for the vet or for people who are here for the niche genre. This is a dirty ignorant lie. And that repeating mantra really puts alot of people off pvp and roaming. Which is sad really, cause null and low provide plenty of good fights. Getting blobbed is an exception rather than rule. Also a need to have 100mil sp before you can do anything in pvp is another ignorant myth. But yeah..it's easier to shoot rats all day and whine.
Quote:This being a niche game, it's attracted a lot of people who don't ever want any aspect of it to ever change or evolve. It's rather closed minded. Seems to me you are the one with a closed mind. Everything you ask for in the infamous 'Arena' is already possible and can be realized by the existing game mechanics.
Heck there is even a completely separate server where you can have free arena like fights.
|

Ur235
FATAL Warfare Reckless Faith
57
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 12:27:00 -
[174] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:Ur235 wrote:Stupid idea if people could enter arenas and fight instead of roaming to find fights then it would be the end of 90% of all roams because hardly anyone would bother going on a roam if they can get an instant fights in some arena, and space would become even emptier than it is now You're wrong. Where would the people get the ships that go into the arena from?
From JITA??? hmm |

Aracimia Wolfe
The Cursed Navy
122
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 12:47:00 -
[175] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Theresa Lamont wrote:baltec1 wrote: We have seen what happened in other MMOs. The PVP outside the arena died out in a matter of days because it is so much easier to get fights at the press of a button. Highly possible. You have examples? Restus in SWG. The moment it hit pvp everywhere else died.
Confirming that killing speeders on a spy was much easier there than anywhere else
I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Bitten.
700
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 13:29:00 -
[176] - Quote
The point is there is absolutely no need for this mechanic. There are already plenty of ways to find pvp, but a few wow-mind carebear twonks want things to cater to them even more, they don't want to experience the many kinds of pvp and existing game areas there already are, they want something entirely un-EVE like that they're familiar with and which is a lot less effort and a lot more on their own terms (aka WOW).
And lets not forget the massive detrimental effect these stupid ideas would have on areas of space which are ALREADY underpopulated and under utilized
Summary: Idiotic idea, please ignore |

fukier
RISE of LEGION
288
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 15:07:00 -
[177] - Quote
this is my idea for this:
fukier wrote:time to drag out the dead horse... i wrote this two years ago but now with can flopping being dead this seems to be prudent... So my proposal is setting up a contract system that is sanctioned by Concord that allows said parties to temp declare war on each other (time period max 30 min)GǪ timmer starts once contract has been accepted... The cost would be 5 million processing fee paid by each partyGǪ and there would be a betting price set by each partyGǪ Each bet price would be negotiable between the parties and would not have to be the same amount. The fights would run under war declaration rules but only the involved parties would be allowed to shoot each other or affect each other in any wayGǪ so that means any members of a gang or allies or corp mates would not be allowed to RR or shoot at either party at penalty of getting a suspect flagGǪ here is how you win 1. whomever does more total damage (this includes repped damage) to the other player wins only the isk at risk... (this is in the situation where niether player can kill the other) 2. if a player leaves the field of combat (250km radius from start of fight) then the other player wins the isk at risk... 3. which ever player is left alive after the fight gets salvage rights to the wreak and the isk at risk... and yes observers can bet money one who will win... they can enter the contract by right clicking on involved chars and adding money to the pool...
At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
801
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 15:24:00 -
[178] - Quote
If you ignore the OP itself, don't think of it as "WoW style arena", and instead think of it in "EVE terms" it's not a bad idea.
The EVE tournaments, but player driven, and tools that facilitate the ability to bet on the outcomes.
I wouldn't mind a system dedicated to providing arenas for people to schedule matches. A jita like system with beacons that we can warp to to watch a match, or have them broadcast on monitors in space or in the CQ.
Players in the system can schedule matches for random apponents or schedule a match against someone specifically. And I mean SCHEDULE. As in, you schedule a match for X date, around Y time. You know, when you know you'll be on and you'd like to participate. If you have enough system the schedule should be managable and create "regional champions".
They could even have GM run fight events periodically where the best people in the various regions will fight for "the belt" tha they would hold for a period of time.
I'm sure that CCP is capable of developing the system tools needed to mimic something like BOXING.
WoW arenas are horrible.
EVE "arenas" could be frigging awesome.
OP should just delete his OP and then copy/ paste this post in it's place.
PS: The AT's would be the olympics of EVE, this would be the boxing. |

Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
204
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 15:58:00 -
[179] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Set up a betting system
I can see all sorts of new scams arising out of people gaming such a system. Other than that, this idea is without merit. If you want arenas, there are tons of other games that have them. Can't we have one, just one game that is different. Please?
|

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
802
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 16:11:00 -
[180] - Quote
Maxpie wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote:Set up a betting system I can see all sorts of new scams arising out of people gaming such a system. Other than that, this idea is without merit. If you want arenas, there are tons of other games that have them. Can't we have one, just one game that is different. Please? Or that would be one of the pluses of a betting system.
People being able to manipulate ods. Just because it would be a "bad act" doesn't make it a "bad idea", or "unfun".
There is no such thing as unmanipualted ods, the fact that they exist means that someone is already manipulating something. Gambling is a scam by it's very nature.
Stop thinking about WoW arenas, the OP is off his rocker. Instead think EVE and tools. Because that would be a great addition to the game. |

Dragon Outlaw
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
144
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 17:22:00 -
[181] - Quote
In WoT (world Of Tanks), arena PvP is pretty much alive and it does not kill PvP. You select the tank you wish to use, you hit BATTLE, and your fight starts in 30 seconds (15 vs 15). No need to roam for hours to get a fight. People saying that the arena concept would kill PvP in Eve are either wrong or hypocrits. Arenas would only "move" PvP somewhere else. Maybe it would kill roams but who cares. We roam to get fights, not to fly as tourists. Most of the PvP that would remain in the game would be more for fights that "matters". Just like in WoT where people fight on the World Map with their clan m8s to conquer or defend territory. Those type of fights happen constently. The Arena feature does not stop people to play on that map. In the contrary it helps it. Individual players use the arena to refine their skills. Clans use it to train their members for world map fights and elaborate strategies. We then go on that map to see how good we are and to conquer territory (and for Gold).
RvB? Hey, I been in there and had fun...until I was tired of T1 frig and destroyer fights. Often I had to stend down with a T1 cruiser. Battlecruisers seemed to raise complaints everytime someone would bring one on the field, and do not remember fights involving battleships. The RvB fun gets away quick when you have the skills to fly better ships and you are constently told not to fly them. In my opinion, RvB exist because their are no arena. So its disapearance would not botter me. So bring this arena (or simulator), make sure that their is still a cost to play in it (ISKs / fights or use your existing ships). I know a LOT of people would enjoy this.
The RMTers and adepts of cheap PvP can go cry to their moms if this is introduced. The though of reading all those rage posts excites me. Bring the arenas CCP. |

Shylari Avada
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
157
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 17:52:00 -
[182] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:In WoT (world Of Tanks), arena PvP is pretty much alive and it does not kill PvP.
You mean a game, with one of two options (both being Arena PvP) is 'pretty much alive' with constant PvP?
Fascinating.
|

Natsett Amuinn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
804
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 17:55:00 -
[183] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:In WoT (world Of Tanks), arena PvP is pretty much alive and it does not kill PvP. You select the tank you wish to use, you hit BATTLE, and your fight starts in 30 seconds (15 vs 15). No need to roam for hours to get a fight. People saying that the arena concept would kill PvP in Eve are either wrong or hypocrits. Arenas would only "move" some of the PvP somewhere else. Maybe it would kill roams but who cares. We roam to get fights, not to fly as tourists. The rest of the PvP that would remain in the game would be more for fights that "matters". Just like in WoT where people fight on the World Map with their clan m8s to conquer or defend territory. Those type of fights happen constently. The Arena feature does not stop people to play on that map. In the contrary it helps it. Individual players use the arena to refine their skills. Clans use it to train their members for world map fights and elaborate strategies. We then go on that map to see how good we are  and to conquer territory (and for Gold). RvB? Hey, I been in there and had fun...until I was tired of T1 frig and destroyer fights. Often I had to stend down with a T1 cruiser. Battlecruisers seemed to raise complaints everytime someone would bring one on the field, and do not remember fights involving battleships. The RvB fun gets away quick when you have the skills to fly better ships and you are constently told not to fly them. In my opinion, RvB exist because their are no arena. So its disapearance would not botter me. So bring this arena (or simulator), make sure that their is still a cost to play in it (ISKs / fights or use your existing ships). I know a LOT of people would enjoy this. The RMTers and adepts of cheap PvP can go cry to their moms if this is introduced. The though of reading all those rage posts excites me. Bring the arenas CCP.  As bad as the op.
Geez, I wonder why it works in WoT. I wonder if it's got something to do with the entire game beign built around that very gameplay mechanic, wtf?
Holy ****, you just wrote a small wall of text trying to compare a non persistant world game and "how it works" to EVE. Are you not actually playing EVE |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1457
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 18:01:00 -
[184] - Quote
You know, I might start an Arena. Setup 1v1 battles & stream it on to YouTube, allow people to bet on the participants. All I need is some trustworthy people to assist me with running it 23.5/7. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

fukier
RISE of LEGION
288
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 18:14:00 -
[185] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:You know, I might start an Arena. Setup 1v1 battles & stream it on to YouTube, allow people to bet on the participants. All I need is some trustworthy people to assist me with running it 23.5/7.
perhaps an ehhanced version of my idea from this post would be the best way to achieve this idea... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 18:16:00 -
[186] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:If you ignore the OP itself, don't think of it as "WoW style arena", and instead think of it in "EVE terms" it's not a bad idea.
The EVE tournaments, but player driven, and tools that facilitate the ability to bet on the outcomes.
I wouldn't mind a system dedicated to providing arenas for people to schedule matches. A jita like system with beacons that we can warp to to watch a match, or have them broadcast on monitors in space or in the CQ.
Players in the system can schedule matches for random apponents or schedule a match against someone specifically. And I mean SCHEDULE. As in, you schedule a match for X date, around Y time. You know, when you know you'll be on and you'd like to participate. If you have enough system the schedule should be managable and create "regional champions".
They could even have GM run fight events periodically where the best people in the various regions will fight for "the belt" tha they would hold for a period of time.
I'm sure that CCP is capable of developing the system tools needed to mimic something like BOXING.
WoW arenas are horrible.
EVE "arenas" could be frigging awesome.
OP should just delete his OP and then copy/ paste this post in it's place.
PS: The AT's would be the olympics of EVE, this would be the boxing.
We really need to stop calling it an Arena and instead call it a persistent tournament system. Dual Pane idea: Click!
CCP Please Implement |

Ager Agemo
Saturn Reaper
147
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 18:44:00 -
[187] - Quote
who cares if pvp is done in arenas or not? in the end your ship will blow up anyway O,o isnt that what matters, ships blowing up? also arenas wont affect sov at all since you still have to fight in null to control null sec space. |

Dragon Outlaw
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
144
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:12:00 -
[188] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
As bad as the op.
Geez, I wonder why it works in WoT. I wonder if it's got something to do with the entire game beign built around that very gameplay mechanic, wtf?
Holy ****, you just wrote a small wall of text trying to compare a non persistant world game and "how it works" to EVE. Are you not actually playing EVE
I was logged in Eve almost all weekend m8. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1459
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:16:00 -
[189] - Quote
Dragon Outlaw wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:
As bad as the op.
Geez, I wonder why it works in WoT. I wonder if it's got something to do with the entire game beign built around that very gameplay mechanic, wtf?
Holy ****, you just wrote a small wall of text trying to compare a non persistant world game and "how it works" to EVE. Are you not actually playing EVE
I was logged in Eve almost all weekend m8.
Logged in doesn't mean you're playing.
It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

GatoOFruits
InterSun Freelance Moon Warriors
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:29:00 -
[190] - Quote
I would not mind the concept of "duels": via contract 2 individuals agree to fight in a specified ship class, they meet in a System, Concord is there to guarantee that there is not off-grid booster, no remote repair alt and nobody (included the mandatory Falcon pilot) interfere with the fight. No spectator, no "ranking", no betting, all ships and clones destroyable. Not an arena but a duel as a quick way to resolve differences of opinions. |

motgus
Lightbringer's Sanctuary RAZOR Alliance
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:30:00 -
[191] - Quote
Go back to WoW, no one wants this bullshit here |

fukier
RISE of LEGION
288
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:34:00 -
[192] - Quote
motgus wrote:Go back to WoW, no one wants this bullshit here
but but i want them here  At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Sarlot
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:47:00 -
[193] - Quote
An arena in a pvp game? Isn't that redundant? Isn't .4 sec and below an arena? Am I missing something or is this just another whine for more handholding in this once brutal game? I don't know what to make of it. As all the other mmos continue to shrivel and die and old Eve keeps chugging along we keep hearing these pathetic cries to turn this game into yet another dying mmo. Come up with a NEW idea for one on one pvp!! Areyou that devoid of ideas? |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
77
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 20:52:00 -
[194] - Quote
Why not start this with the limited engagement tag? You set the price on yourself (default is a number that can not be afforded, or for true EVEness 100k) Then when you are ready to do it you look for someone else with a le tag setup The actual set up should be much like trade, both your price tags show up along with your fits. If you both agree the fight starts. During this time you can not swap ships so as to prevent a frig fight from suddenly having a rokh with small guns on field. Winner can be whoever survives or in the event you run away and the timer runs down, whoever did the most damage. Prize is the money wagered in the tags
EVE goodies that set it apart are: No instancing, you have to see the person and you fight right there Outside help is allowed, though you will have some interesting results with the rest of the people much as now. So yes you can use a suicide gank to win instantly, though your suicider still suffers. But hey this is EVE you didnt need that ship anyways. Scamming is possible, set up your implants right and you can mow them down. Or set your fee to a number the careless will regret. Or perhaps you get a little refit help from that ORCA hanging around(unless the flags prevent refitting your ship at the SMA, never been with an Orca so no clue) Streaming, have a list of those with the tags availible and that we can watch. Betting for now can be handled by a third party person, with all that entails in EVE |

Klown Walk
New Eden Renegades Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
147
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 21:11:00 -
[195] - Quote
People complain how empty low sec/0.0 is and you want to have pvp arenas, I'm sure that will make it much better. I remember WoW having very active world pvp and as soon as they added battlegrounds/arenas to the game world pvp died. |

YoYo NickyYo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 21:53:00 -
[196] - Quote
Sarlot wrote:An arena in a pvp game? Isn't that redundant? Isn't .4 sec and below an arena? Am I missing something or is this just another whine for more handholding in this once brutal game? I don't know what to make of it. As all the other mmos continue to shrivel and die and old Eve keeps chugging along we keep hearing these pathetic cries to turn this game into yet another dying mmo. Come up with a NEW idea for one on one pvp!! Areyou that devoid of ideas?
I think the OP's point was, there is no Honor in EVE....
The only way to ensure a duel is fair in EVE is to have an arena, participants should be able to preset rules and ship fitting limitations. The ships enter the arena , and you fight it out without outside interference.
Actually I kind of like the idea, it wouldn't appeal to low sec or 0.0 people, but then that wouldn't be it's target audience anyway....
"Working as intended" |

Toriessian
Helion Production Labs Mildly Sober
49
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:37:00 -
[197] - Quote
I think a system that creates a professional 1v1 fight league that encourages the sponsorship model you see in boxing/ufc or racing could work in EvE. Corps/alliances could sponsor the fighters (**would be pimp if it got the corp logo on a ship**) or sponsor full events/purses. This could create a new profession. Prize Fighter. Sometimes the fix will be in... but thats not really all that different from real life. This sponsorship system could also create a new recruiting pipeline. Maybe it can give some real content (social and PEW PEW) to new players. Recruiters could have a field day with that too I'd bet.
I haven't always been in the "pro arena" camp. I've come to the conclusion though that its the only path to a fair 1v1 fight. It is completely disingenuous to suggest null or lowsec for 1v1 activity for a few reasons.
1) Come 1v1 me in null. I'll be the one in the Arazu. Remember "EvE isn't fair. 1v1 lol".
2) Yes it might be possible to get everyone into a deep cynojammed null system with all entrances gate camped to ensure a fair fight. It might be possible to create a secure corridor for legit new players that want to participate to travel down. I would say it would be hard at best to guarantee that for a day. How about for 10 publicly announced fights for the next month? 20? 30? Oh can you live stream all of that too please. And run a legit betting house? Player run leagues like this can't scale.
3) If all the participants were in the same corp in hi sec... they'd have to leave their current corp? The corp would get dec'd into oblivion?
As a player run event a fight league is a lot of work for something that is guaranteed to be disrupted constantly. The game has to have systems to support this for it to be a reality on a large game wide scale. Keep it 1v1 and keep the ship losses real and I don't see how arena 1v1 PvP could possibly threaten null/low PvP if RvB didn't.
|

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
520
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 22:51:00 -
[198] - Quote
wait, arenas? don't we have test server for that already? [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
204
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 00:44:00 -
[199] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Maxpie wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote:Set up a betting system I can see all sorts of new scams arising out of people gaming such a system. Other than that, this idea is without merit. If you want arenas, there are tons of other games that have them. Can't we have one, just one game that is different. Please? Or that would be one of the pluses of a betting system. People being able to manipulate ods. Just because it would be a "bad act" doesn't make it a "bad idea", or "unfun". There is no such thing as unmanipualted ods, the fact that they exist means that someone is already manipulating something. Gambling is a scam by it's very nature. Stop thinking about WoW arenas, the OP is off his rocker. Instead think EVE and tools. Because that would be a great addition to the game.
Yes, that's what I was saying - the scamming potential would be the only plus. As for the arena idea, or however you want to lable it, I dislike the idea completely. There are tons of games out there that hold your hand. If anything, they need to go even more in the direction of player created content.
I'll ask again - can't we have just one game that is different? Please? |

Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 01:30:00 -
[200] - Quote
Maxpie wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Maxpie wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote:Set up a betting system I can see all sorts of new scams arising out of people gaming such a system. Other than that, this idea is without merit. If you want arenas, there are tons of other games that have them. Can't we have one, just one game that is different. Please? Or that would be one of the pluses of a betting system. People being able to manipulate ods. Just because it would be a "bad act" doesn't make it a "bad idea", or "unfun". There is no such thing as unmanipualted ods, the fact that they exist means that someone is already manipulating something. Gambling is a scam by it's very nature. Stop thinking about WoW arenas, the OP is off his rocker. Instead think EVE and tools. Because that would be a great addition to the game. Yes, that's what I was saying - the scamming potential would be the only plus. As for the arena idea, or however you want to lable it, I dislike the idea completely. There are tons of games out there that hold your hand. If anything, they need to go even more in the direction of player created content. I'll ask again - can't we have just one game that is different? Please?
I wasn't proposing something like other games. I was talking 1 Arena per hub. 1 match at a time. Not instanced battle grounds. The ability for players to preselect allowed ships and fittings. You would have the choice of getting in a queue to fight, or scheduling a match. Prizes aren't really required, this is simply dueling. Pilots getting sponsorship is a nice idea. Maybe a minimal fee per ship to enter the Arena for an additional sink. Could the betting be scammed....Well this is EVE, but reputation will likely mean a lot in the betting end.
Think of the possibilities for reinvolvement in this mini-game. Regional broadcasts, you can sit in your mining ship, bored to tears, tired of watching pron and watch a match, even place a bet. Even have out of game broadcasts
Regional tournaments is another interesting idea, groups competing for a regional title. The only reason I brought this up at all, was I seeing so many instances of people wanting a 1 vs 1, but watching it devolve into, you did this, and you did that, you have a Falcon hanging around....etc. Dueling, two men enter, one man leaves, although I guess teams could be possible as well.
|

Az Tek
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3766
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 03:00:00 -
[201] - Quote
First and fore most,
NO
H*LL NO
Second. Non-Consensual PVP is best PVP.
I'm reading comments saying things like,
Ocih wrote:It's a good idea. Don't let the dedicate griefer entitlement gang tell you otherwise.
Etherealclam wrote:I fully support this. Global ganking is and always has been a bad thing.
I'd ask you if you understood WHY EVE is such a great game, but judging by your post you clearly do not.
EVE in it's entirety is based on everything pointing AWAY from this. It's a Sandbox where ANYTHING can happen. There should not EVER be a designated place to PVP in the sense that you are referring to.
I solo PVP for the most part and think that this is a horrible idea. IF you do not want a 1v1 legitimately then I am going to STILL try my hardest to kill or gank you. Asking is only a courtesy.
There is nothing more awesome than roaming about solo or even small gang and running into a fleet. And while trying to determine the best way to approach and attack said fleet another fleet comes in and starts fighting the other. You, by your self, maneuver in and out of the fight picking off stragglers and surviving all the while participating in glorious battle. I play this game to do what I want when I want. Take that away and you got WOW.
Solution?
If you want Area style PVP Play WOW! If you want risk free gaming play WOW!
David Rockefeller, Sept. 23, 1994-á "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
204
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 04:02:00 -
[202] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote: I wasn't proposing something like other games. I was talking 1 Arena per hub. 1 match at a time. Not instanced battle grounds. The ability for players to preselect allowed ships and fittings. You would have the choice of getting in a queue to fight, or scheduling a match. Prizes aren't really required, this is simply dueling.
So you want to create an alternate combat scenario that bypasses risk/reward entirely? You don't see why this violates the core concept that the entire game is built around, why it cheapens combat and combat experience?
This might be a "back in my day" moment, but back in 2005 I remember being in 0.0 with a few friends. This was the first time we had been out into null sec, and we were scared. We were in cruisers and 1 guy could fly a BC. A Domi dropped down on us out of the blue and instead of fighting like we agreed on, we all pissed our pants and ran, leaving the BC to be eaten alive by the Domi.
The shock of combat, the experience of fighting in and against expensive ships for the first time, it's all an important part of what makes Eve great. |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4559
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 04:18:00 -
[203] - Quote
I had a 1v1 once... it was outside a station "Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
139
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 05:32:00 -
[204] - Quote
People keep coming here from WOW with ideas from WOW.
Get Out.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Shaalira D'arc
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
556
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 06:04:00 -
[205] - Quote
Is this a stealth RvB recruitment thread? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1961
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 06:11:00 -
[206] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:People keep coming here from WOW with ideas from WOW.
Get Out. Soon enough, ~elite arena PVP~ers will be telling you to HTFU and adapt or die to the new, riskless, arena 1v1 honor duels. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Elistea
BLUE Regiment.
115
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 06:18:00 -
[207] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
Go back to WoW and take your DUMB ideas with u. |

Az Tek
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3770
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 06:22:00 -
[208] - Quote
I'll say this although I am opposed to the idea of Area PVP, VERY AGAINST IT, as i stated in a previous post, for me, it crosses the line when it becomes 'required' to PVP.
If it were implemented it shouldn't change anything. Only ADD to what we already have. For instance, Instead of sending a private convo for a 1v1 one could simply send a request for a 1v1. And instead of taking you to an arena for combat you would both be warped off grid 1000+KM's where you would be allowed to fight. No other pilots would be able to engage or even lock you during this fight. No outside interference at all. The only thing this would change as far as in game/ non game mechanic goes is that there would be no more dishonoring 1v1's. Via Loggie alts, Nuet RR, etc,. However, some people would fight against this concept as they get a fair bit of their kills dishonoring 1v1s. Namely. Station hugging hippies in jita, rens, or amarr. Though it's effects would be felt all over the universe. I my self like it how it is and would hate to see it implemented but if it was this is the evil i would pick. David Rockefeller, Sept. 23, 1994-á "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
92
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:00:00 -
[209] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote: I wasn't proposing something like other games. I was talking 1 Arena per hub. 1 match at a time. Not instanced battle grounds. The ability for players to preselect allowed ships and fittings. You would have the choice of getting in a queue to fight, or scheduling a match. Prizes aren't really required, this is simply dueling. Pilots getting sponsorship is a nice idea. Maybe a minimal fee per ship to enter the Arena for an additional sink.
All this already exists. Players groups, corporations and alliances already do this. Such as:
http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?newsTitle=hertic-army-runs-frigfest-in-amamake-1
or
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=165312
What you're asking for is to have it as premade theme park protected areas contents, instead of player driven sandbox events.
|

Az Tek
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3779
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:03:00 -
[210] - Quote
EVE is THE sandbox of MMO's. Or any game for that matter. IF you do not like it. Do not play it. David Rockefeller, Sept. 23, 1994-á "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1461
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:05:00 -
[211] - Quote
Az Tek wrote:EVE is THE sandbox of MMO's. Or any game for that matter. IF you do not like it. Do not play it.
The box needs more sand. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

iudex
State Protectorate Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:07:00 -
[212] - Quote
I agree with OP, it's about time. If you do it right, there are no real drawbacks. It also perfectly fits into the EVE backround story, just read the race info of Caldari. I know it's more challenging than creating another cruiser and destroyer or somesuch, but this could add a lot of fun to players who don't like to wait for hours to have a PVP experience and be something really new after a long time. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1461
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:09:00 -
[213] - Quote
iudex wrote:I agree with OP, it's about time. If you do it right, there are no real drawbacks. It also perfectly fits into the EVE backround story, just read the race info of Caldari. I know it's more challenging than creating another cruiser and destroyer or somesuch, but this could add a lot of fun to players who don't like to wait for hours to have a PVP experience and be something really new after a long time.
Go & suicide gank something if you don't want to wait for hours. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Az Tek
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3780
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:11:00 -
[214] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Az Tek wrote:EVE is THE sandbox of MMO's. Or any game for that matter. IF you do not like it. Do not play it. The box needs more sand. Would you like to fight in my arena?
I assure you that this box has plenty of Sand. Being the Goon that you are you should know. After all, you greedy little kids are the ones hogging it all. :P David Rockefeller, Sept. 23, 1994-á "This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
4385
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:21:00 -
[215] - Quote
I'd rather see a solo pvp system in first since solo can-fighting is gone *GLOMP* with your AltGäó-á |

Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
300
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 07:37:00 -
[216] - Quote
Personally I would not want to see dev time put into this.
If you want to run a tournament, go on the test server? You can get all the modules you need without supply or ISK problems and finding an empty system is quick and easy. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Yogsoloth
Percussive Diplomacy Samurai Pizza Cats
86
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 13:37:00 -
[217] - Quote
No, Just no !
If you did this, too many pvp'ers would gravitate there and it would make the rest of space that much worse. |

Ager Agemo
Saturn Reaper
148
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:11:00 -
[218] - Quote
how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this... |

Metal Icarus
Legion Of Idiots legion of extraordinary Idi0ts
404
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:17:00 -
[219] - Quote
10/10 OP, you are an Idiot, and I know a thing or two about Idiots....
You should join us! |

Az Tek
the unified Negative Ten.
3871
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:19:00 -
[220] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this...
PVP needs to have the ability to be both sporadic and random while being organized at the same time. It can happen anywhere at anytime. Risk of losing your ship during an Arena PVP 1v1 is a calculated risk and is predictable for the most part. True PVP should not be limited or capped or anyway controlled. Also with a system like that where would us pirates be with out non consensual PVP? Should we first ask you if it is alright to gank you when you jump into our gate. Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color Coding and More! Gÿú
Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:25:00 -
[221] - Quote
Out of curiosity is my idea of using the le tag a bad WOW one or still in character with EVE? |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
118
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:32:00 -
[222] - Quote
Az Tek wrote:EVE is THE sandbox of MMO's. Or any game for that matter. IF you do not like it. Do not play it.
in fact OP should go to Rancer and warp to one of the gates. He will see a flash and portal that leads to Arena realm will open.
Be sure to do it in a pod or T1 frigate, otherwise it might not work. I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

Sentamon
382
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:41:00 -
[223] - Quote
Lets settle our mortal differences in the nice and safe arena. Yeah ... lame. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Vol Arm'OOO
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
55
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:41:00 -
[224] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote: I wasn't proposing something like other games. I was talking 1 Arena per hub. 1 match at a time. Not instanced battle grounds. The ability for players to preselect allowed ships and fittings. You would have the choice of getting in a queue to fight, or scheduling a match. Prizes aren't really required, this is simply dueling. Pilots getting sponsorship is a nice idea. Maybe a minimal fee per ship to enter the Arena for an additional sink.
All this already exists. Players groups, corporations and alliances already do this. Such as: http://community.eveonline.com/news/newsFromEve.asp?newsTitle=hertic-army-runs-frigfest-in-amamake-1or https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=165312What you're asking for is to have it as premade theme park protected areas contents, instead of player driven sandbox events.
I wouldnt be against the arena idea if you had to travel to the arena with your ships to participate. Imagine, you could have four arenas each situated in lowsec. Why lowsec? Well lowsec needs content and bloodsports are kinda seedy and should be placed in a seedy area. Players who wanted to fight at the arena would have to travel to the arena in the ships they wanted to use. The resources - such as markets and repair facilities would be located at stations elsewhere in the system. Thus the areas outside of the arena would be prime potential pirate grounds while the areas inside the arena would be havens for gud fights. |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
119
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:43:00 -
[225] - Quote
Luke Visteen wrote:Az Tek wrote:EVE is THE sandbox of MMO's. Or any game for that matter. IF you do not like it. Do not play it. in fact OP should go to Rancer and warp to one of the gates. He will see a flash and a portal that leads to Arena realm will open. Be sure to do it in a pod or T1 frigate, otherwise it might not work.
I don't think we are allowed to talk about "secret Arena realm exploit". should not have started it  I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
131
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:51:00 -
[226] - Quote
I think a highsec arena system would really benefit the game.
Or perhaps a 'simulator' where you could fit up whatever you want with some pals and have a little virtual pew pew without losing anything. .. Jumpgate online had something like that, and it was a popular feature
- allows people to test out fits and try things they normally wouldn't, without risk - is not a replacement for the rush of 'real' combat.
you can say 'go to test server' but that's not really the same.... A feature like this could be a nice segway for people in highsec who don't PVP getting their PVP / piloting skill legs before they jump into lowsec/null/wardec corps etc..
The average player has no interest in downloading an entire other copy of the game and asking their mates to as well just to 'try stuff out.. in fact id' argue that most players don't even know test server exists. |

Ager Agemo
Saturn Reaper
148
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:54:00 -
[227] - Quote
Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this... PVP needs to have the ability to be both sporadic and random while being organized at the same time. It can happen anywhere at anytime. Risk of losing your ship during an Arena PVP 1v1 is a calculated risk and is predictable for the most part. True PVP should not be limited or capped or anyway controlled. Also with a system like that where would us pirates be with out non consensual PVP? Should we first ask you if it is alright to gank you when you jump into our gate.
uhm, my risk of losing a ship in low or null sec its a calculated risk too, do that means I do riskless pvp already?
and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas? |

Aston Martin DB5
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 16:58:00 -
[228] - Quote
Then you have game complaints about player discrepancy with skills and attributes or aka balance issues. Players that have subscribed longer having level 5 skills versus a player playing for, lets say, 8 months would be at a disadvantage. Unless of course these "arenas" provide the pilots with all level 5 skills for the battle.? > |

Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
131
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:03:00 -
[229] - Quote
Aston Martin DB5 wrote:Then you have game complaints about player discrepancy with skills and attributes or aka balance issues. Players that have subscribed longer having level 5 skills versus a player playing for, lets say, 8 months would be at a disadvantage. Unless of course these "arenas" provide the pilots with all level 5 skills for the battle.? >
this is something i have really wished for.. the ability to 'test drive' higher skillpoints than i have .. be it on live or test server..
i'd like, for example to be able to level 5 myself out in some sandbox and maybe try out the various blackops so i could decide what race id like to skill for.
looking at the numbers in Pyfa/EFT just isn't the same |

Az Tek
the unified Negative Ten.
3891
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:08:00 -
[230] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this... PVP needs to have the ability to be both sporadic and random while being organized at the same time. It can happen anywhere at anytime. Risk of losing your ship during an Arena PVP 1v1 is a calculated risk and is predictable for the most part. True PVP should not be limited or capped or anyway controlled. Also with a system like that where would us pirates be with out non consensual PVP? Should we first ask you if it is alright to gank you when you jump into our gate. uhm, my risk of losing a ship in low or null sec its a calculated risk too, do that means I do riskless pvp already? and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas?
Like this concept I posted? Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color Coding and More! Gÿú
Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú |

Ager Agemo
Saturn Reaper
148
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:09:00 -
[231] - Quote
Aston Martin DB5 wrote:Then you have game complaints about player discrepancy with skills and attributes or aka balance issues. Players that have subscribed longer having level 5 skills versus a player playing for, lets say, 8 months would be at a disadvantage. Unless of course these "arenas" provide the pilots with all level 5 skills for the battle.? >
you have a point there, but i believe this is pushing it way too far, i dont think people asking for arenas would ask something like this, way tooooo wowish, and even in WOW i think they have to fight people of higher level sometimes no?
anyone here plays WoW to confirm? |

Az Tek
the unified Negative Ten.
3891
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:11:00 -
[232] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:Aston Martin DB5 wrote:Then you have game complaints about player discrepancy with skills and attributes or aka balance issues. Players that have subscribed longer having level 5 skills versus a player playing for, lets say, 8 months would be at a disadvantage. Unless of course these "arenas" provide the pilots with all level 5 skills for the battle.? > you have a point there, but i believe this is pushing it way too far, i dont think people asking for arenas would ask something like this, way tooooo wowish, and even in WOW i think they have to fight people of higher level sometimes no? anyone here plays WoW to confirm?
You can only truly hate WOW if you have played it. So i'm sure most people here have at-least made it to the WOW log in screen. Bout as far as I've got. Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color Coding and More! Gÿú
Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú |

Ager Agemo
Saturn Reaper
148
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:13:00 -
[233] - Quote
Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this... PVP needs to have the ability to be both sporadic and random while being organized at the same time. It can happen anywhere at anytime. Risk of losing your ship during an Arena PVP 1v1 is a calculated risk and is predictable for the most part. True PVP should not be limited or capped or anyway controlled. Also with a system like that where would us pirates be with out non consensual PVP? Should we first ask you if it is alright to gank you when you jump into our gate. uhm, my risk of losing a ship in low or null sec its a calculated risk too, do that means I do riskless pvp already? and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas? Like this concept I posted?
No, i dont like that because it allows for exploits, you could request a duel with someone just so your ship becomes impossible to lock and thus safe from being killed during a wardec or alike.
what we need its just a request pvp flag, that makes you and your target legal targets to each other without concord intervention. ly, and maybe add a criminal flag to any logistic ship that helps either party. this way you keep it honorable, or at least allows everyone to gank the dishonorable logistic ship lol. |

Az Tek
the unified Negative Ten.
3898
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 17:16:00 -
[234] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote:Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:Az Tek wrote:Ager Agemo wrote:how is it riskless if you still have the risk of losing your ship in the end? seriously asking this... PVP needs to have the ability to be both sporadic and random while being organized at the same time. It can happen anywhere at anytime. Risk of losing your ship during an Arena PVP 1v1 is a calculated risk and is predictable for the most part. True PVP should not be limited or capped or anyway controlled. Also with a system like that where would us pirates be with out non consensual PVP? Should we first ask you if it is alright to gank you when you jump into our gate. uhm, my risk of losing a ship in low or null sec its a calculated risk too, do that means I do riskless pvp already? and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas? Like this concept I posted? No, i dont like that because it allows for exploits, you could request a duel with someone just so your ship becomes impossible to lock and thus safe from being killed during a wardec or alike. what we need its just a request pvp flag, that makes you and your target legal targets to each other without concord intervention. ly, and maybe add a criminal flag to any logistic ship that helps either party. this way you keep it honorable, or at least allows everyone to gank the dishonorable logistic ship lol.
Well to be honest.. lol, We just don't need it at all.
This mechanic needs not be touched at all!
We should stop beating this horse. This B**ch is dead. Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color Coding and More! Gÿú
Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú |

YoYo NickyYo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:08:00 -
[235] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Lets settle our mortal differences in the nice and safe arena. Yeah ... lame.
Any lamer than the guy with the Falcon alt waiting to screw you over in a 1 vs 1? And you still lose a ship, so I wouldn't call it completely safe. Not to mention the embarrassment of losing in front of a live audience.....
"You have to find the good in any situation!"
"Working as intended" |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
93
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:18:00 -
[236] - Quote
Ager Agemo wrote: and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas?
No.
It's a way to makes duels (not "true" PvP) where they are 100% granted to decide: where to fight when to fight who to fight. what ship to use.
All this ruled by game mechanics.
it's an exploit to remove the open world PvP concept from EvE.
They want this for high sec of course. They never move from there (because we all know, as soon as you jump in low you automatically explode, so is impossible...) and claim the rights to have everything without moving. Also the right to have their specific idea of PvP (consensual, 100% granted, fair and bla bla) in the area of EvE less PvP-friendly area of the game: high sec. Of course they cannot put the same effort in game as eveyone else, their attention span is short (this is why they never check D-Scan): they come from WoW, Diablo, Everquest, LOTRO and they're used to have all easy, shiny and quick.
In their mind Eve High Sec is, or should be, like a WoW PvE server. Forget it, EvE players will never allow this.
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
93
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:21:00 -
[237] - Quote
Vol Arm'OOO wrote: I wouldnt be against the arena idea if you had to travel to the arena with your ships to participate.
Forget it, they want it just to avoid to leave high sec.
And the next request will be just a queue system that auomatically offer to teleport your ship in the battleground when is your turn.
|

YoYo NickyYo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
85
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:23:00 -
[238] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Ager Agemo wrote: and hey I once was a pirate albeit by a very short time, pirating on alliances dosnt count I oppose safe havens, however I don't really see the issue with arenas as long as everything else stays the same, is just a way to allow people to kill each other without interference of third parties, like MechWarrior arenas?
No. It's a way to makes duels (not "true" PvP) where they are 100% granted to decide: where to fight when to fight who to fight. what ship to use. All this ruled by game mechanics. it's an exploit to remove the open world PvP concept from EvE. They want this for high sec of course. They never move from there (because we all know, as soon as you jump in low you automatically explode, so is impossible...) and claim the rights to have everything without moving. Also the right to have their specific idea of PvP (consensual, 100% granted, fair and bla bla) in the area of EvE less PvP-friendly area of the game: high sec. Of course they cannot put the same effort in game as eveyone else, their attention span is short (this is why they never check D-Scan): they come from WoW, Diablo, Everquest, LOTRO and they're used to have all easy, shiny and quick. In their mind Eve High Sec is, or should be, like a WoW PvE server. Forget it, EvE players will never allow this.
When did you become the "voice" of EVE? 
"Working as intended" |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
93
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:28:00 -
[239] - Quote
YoYo NickyYo wrote:When did you become the "voice" of EVE? 
I am not, Mister alt. But at least I can post with my main. You have to post with an alt so you're not even the voice of yourself.
My is an analysys. Try it and let's see. My money are that the jita riot would look like a pic-nic in respect of this.
|

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
599
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:30:00 -
[240] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Biomass your characters and unsub, wiggin. You're playing the wrong game.
Thats right. PvP should be done in nullsec, far away from everyones hisec alts running incursions at zero risk.
From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |

Yim Sei
Ontogenic Achronycal PLC
10
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 18:58:00 -
[241] - Quote
Arenas are a terrible idea. Would totally ruin the whole concept.
There are lots of 'consensual' PvP games out there - please go play them - dont ruin Eve.
/thread Post with my main? This is my main - I just overtrain and overplay my alts. |

Az Tek
the unified Negative Ten.
3912
|
Posted - 2012.12.19 19:58:00 -
[242] - Quote
I am Justin Bieber.
Please, please, noone get up. I'll be here all week guys. Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color Coding and More! Gÿú
Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú |

Wacktopia
Noir. Black Legion.
301
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 09:55:00 -
[243] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:I think a highsec arena system would really benefit the game.
Or perhaps a 'simulator' where you could fit up whatever you want with some pals and have a little virtual pew pew without losing anything. .. Jumpgate online had something like that, and it was a popular feature
- allows people to test out fits and try things they normally wouldn't, without risk - is not a replacement for the rush of 'real' combat.
you can say 'go to test server' but that's not really the same.... A feature like this could be a nice segway for people in highsec who don't PVP getting their PVP / piloting skill legs before they jump into lowsec/null/wardec corps etc..
The average player has no interest in downloading an entire other copy of the game and asking their mates to as well just to 'try stuff out.. in fact id' argue that most players don't even know test server exists.
You can go to the test server, it is exactly the same as what you are describing. You don't really present a valid argument for creating an entirely new game mechanic over simply going to the tt server if you want to test fits or run a tourney.
You do not need to download another copy. The test server launcher makes using it a much simpler task than it was years back.
I do accept your point that it is more effort to get on the test server but I do not think that all now players need to test stuff there. Part of what makes EVE so cool is the learning experience. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
1441
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:20:00 -
[244] - Quote
Arenas and any similar gimmicks lack everything that makes EVE PVP special, worthwhile and challenging.
Strong NO.
I tried to remove this sig. |

Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
330
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:24:00 -
[245] - Quote
No arenas, ever. Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything. |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
523
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:37:00 -
[246] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:I think a highsec arena system would really benefit the game.
Or perhaps a 'simulator' where you could fit up whatever you want with some pals and have a little virtual pew pew without losing anything. .. Jumpgate online had something like that, and it was a popular feature
- allows people to test out fits and try things they normally wouldn't, without risk - is not a replacement for the rush of 'real' combat.
you can say 'go to test server' but that's not really the same.... A feature like this could be a nice segway for people in highsec who don't PVP getting their PVP / piloting skill legs before they jump into lowsec/null/wardec corps etc..
The average player has no interest in downloading an entire other copy of the game and asking their mates to as well just to 'try stuff out.. in fact id' argue that most players don't even know test server exists. CCP toyed with that idea a few years ago.
they put it on an internal test server and the server simply flat out rejected the code.
moral of the story, if not even the server wants it, **** that. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
330
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:53:00 -
[247] - Quote
Grimpak wrote:Chandaris wrote:I think a highsec arena system would really benefit the game.
Or perhaps a 'simulator' where you could fit up whatever you want with some pals and have a little virtual pew pew without losing anything. .. Jumpgate online had something like that, and it was a popular feature
- allows people to test out fits and try things they normally wouldn't, without risk - is not a replacement for the rush of 'real' combat.
you can say 'go to test server' but that's not really the same.... A feature like this could be a nice segway for people in highsec who don't PVP getting their PVP / piloting skill legs before they jump into lowsec/null/wardec corps etc..
The average player has no interest in downloading an entire other copy of the game and asking their mates to as well just to 'try stuff out.. in fact id' argue that most players don't even know test server exists. CCP toyed with that idea a few years ago. they put it on an internal test server and the server simply flat out rejected the code. moral of the story, if not even the server wants it, **** that.
It also gave the DEVS in question herpes, at least that's the official explanation.
Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything. |

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
125
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:59:00 -
[248] - Quote
Step 1. go to empty/quiet wh Step 2. get friends Step 3. warp to celestial Step 4. Drop bubble Step 5. Pewpew ???? No need for arenas wumbo |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1977
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 11:31:00 -
[249] - Quote
I am really starting to get the impression that a lot of people rely on others not having the right fits or enough experience in order to get their "kills".
This is pathetic. |

Aracimia Wolfe
The Cursed Navy
123
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 12:34:00 -
[250] - Quote
We've had arenas for ages. They're called Large Warp Disruption bubbles I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

Opertone
Aurora Empire Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
198
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 12:35:00 -
[251] - Quote
yes!!! |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
86
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 13:43:00 -
[252] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I am really starting to get the impression that a lot of people rely on others not having the right fits or enough experience in order to get their "kills".
This is pathetic. You would be somewhere between massively and your mother joke collection correct. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 14:26:00 -
[253] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Biomass your characters and unsub, wiggin. You're playing the wrong game.
You mean as opposed to going to Sisi and practicing your pvp then coming into Tranquility and doing it for real?
Sisi is a viable alternative to arenas but, it's not in game. It's on a test server. Expecting customers to do it to enhance their game is, well, game breaking since it's not in "the" game.
This has been a topic of which I've long supported. And it should be available to all players anywhere in New Eden. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Fairren
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 15:40:00 -
[254] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I am really starting to get the impression that a lot of people rely on others not having the right fits or enough experience in order to get their "kills".
This is pathetic. You've got your MMO PVPer stereotypes all wrong. The "world" PVPers rely on numbers, and the "arena" PVPers rely on better gear and experience. |

Oxandrolone
Bite Me inc Bitten.
72
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 16:05:00 -
[255] - Quote
Like fozzie said let there be some mechanic for players to run arenas, NPC or CCP run arenas would suck. |

Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
170
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 18:32:00 -
[256] - Quote
People thinking about arenas because here is big lack of dynamic instant pvp, in fact pvp are wery long them proces because.
People thinking about ship type and pvp role and plan how to fit.
Spending long time in market in genral to buy ship and modules at best price, and this take some time and paying atention or orders.
Long distance roams, New Eden is big place, before people enter battlefield they need spent some time to reach goal form system x to system y.
And finaly, 10 sec fight vs blob :) welcome in EvE, now reperat all abowe to prepare new pvp ship ;) EvE isn't game, its style of living. |

cytheras wrath
Trolls Revenge Relativity Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 19:53:00 -
[257] - Quote
If we are going to add arenas, we need 1337 ship modules to aquire. like the big red button ( makes you win your next arena match and collect all modules of your opponent ), or 1337 supermega cyno of titans and a jovearmada. where you click it and a **** load of ships appear and focus fire on the target, can only be used once every 2 seconds.
Oh! we cant forget the exotic dancer slingshot auto cannon, and its T2 variant, the slaver quad-slingshot auto cannon, does little damage, but adds +42 to the gore factor of EVE.
maybe we can add something like a ship look changer module-thingy, where you can add more spikes, blood or random bio-mass's to the outside of your ship.
and to make the game more fun, add potato chips and beer, and hotdogs, and kittens....
[Adds more stupid ideas until all stupid ideas are gone]
we need more cow bells! |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1977
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 21:36:00 -
[258] - Quote
Fairren wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I am really starting to get the impression that a lot of people rely on others not having the right fits or enough experience in order to get their "kills".
This is pathetic. You've got your MMO PVPer stereotypes all wrong. The "world" PVPers rely on numbers, and the "arena" PVPers rely on better gear and experience.
Perhaps. But I don't think one has to break the other.
A combat simulator as an extension of the fitting tool would be a great way to find out if your tank is paper or your DPS is lame without having to pad someone else kill board.
That some people rely on lack of experience and fitting mistakes to pad their kill boards, and ferociously attack any idea of a testing system, is telling me that they are really crap PVPers pretending to be leet.
|

Cambarus
Aliastra Gallente Federation
225
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 21:55:00 -
[259] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Fairren wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:I am really starting to get the impression that a lot of people rely on others not having the right fits or enough experience in order to get their "kills".
This is pathetic. You've got your MMO PVPer stereotypes all wrong. The "world" PVPers rely on numbers, and the "arena" PVPers rely on better gear and experience. Perhaps. But I don't think one has to break the other. A combat simulator as an extension of the fitting tool would be a great way to find out if your tank is paper or your DPS is lame without having to pad someone else kill board. That some people rely on lack of experience and fitting mistakes to pad their kill boards, and ferociously attack any idea of a testing system, is telling me that they are really crap PVPers pretending to be leet. The problem is, in a nutshell, that an arena would give people an incentive not to pvp, at least pvp in the current eve sense. If anything there should be MORE incentive to go out roaming, not less. Asking for arenas is akin to asking for immunity in highsec: it goes against one of the core aspects of how the game works, and if you don't like how eve pvp works, then I think it's safe to say that you don't really like eve. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2377
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 22:19:00 -
[260] - Quote
Cambarus wrote:The problem is, in a nutshell, that an arena would give people an incentive not to pvp, at least pvp in the current eve sense. An arena would more likely see PvP instead of the current PvPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP we see now.
Cambarus wrote:If anything there should be MORE incentive to go out roaming, not less. Asking for arenas is akin to asking for immunity in highsec: Immunity means less stuff blowing up. It has already been established that any kind of arena would require real ships with real gear that was build by real players. So when things go boom, it will be real losses. It could potentially mean more ships being exploded. There is a ton of players out there that would love to take on one guy or a small group of players. A good portion do not bother engaging because they know it is a trap/bait and instead choose to not risk their ship. So in the end, no combat takes place.
Cambarus wrote:it goes against one of the core aspects of how the game works, and if you don't like how eve pvp works, then I think it's safe to say that you don't really like eve. That is an asinine statement. Just because someone has an issue with an aspect of the game does not equate to them not liking the game. I don't like how the local channel is used, but does that mean I hate EVE? Of course not. If I did I would not be playing.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Balaen Rorqual
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 22:41:00 -
[261] - Quote
I very much feel like this detracts from the open nature of eveonline. Null and low sec are viscous and your always a target. If you add arenas there will be less people in null and low. The result will be severely damaged Open World pvp.
Eve's pvp nature makes its unique and I would be extremely upset if this was removed from the game. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
246
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 00:43:00 -
[262] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
If you do that whats the point in null sec again? outrunning every one? Nah eve is not wow. Let that be If you want to huge fight then ask the goons to jump your sector the have tons of titans and all that. You have a huge fleet fight. Nah eve is eve let keep it like that |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow C.L.O.N.E.
821
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 00:47:00 -
[263] - Quote
This idea is disgusting. If it ever happens I will quit with my two accounts and take as many people with me as possible. I hope CCP learned their lesson with Incarna because this would be even worse. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
55
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 00:53:00 -
[264] - Quote
I don't think it's something to get all upset over, as long as people realize why it's a poor idea.
Eve was specifically designed not to be a dog-fighting game, but rather to be about preparation, strategy, tactics, etc.
Could you take the basic gameplay and make a decent dogfighting game out of it? Sure, but that was specifically not the intention for Eve. To muddle somewhere in the middle is to create some terrible hybrid game that appeals to no one. If Eve ends up being a failure as a sandbox game, then I think arenas would be a great idea for milking a little more cash out of this particular cow. As it stands, however, all effort should be put towards continuing to make this great experiment that is a space exploration sandbox pvp mmorpg. So far it's pretty ******* awesome, and could continue to get better if the right lessons are learned from the past and applied to the deigns for the future. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow C.L.O.N.E.
821
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 00:56:00 -
[265] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:I don't think it's something to get all upset over, as long as people realize why it's a poor idea.
Eve was specifically designed not to be a dog-fighting game, but rather to be about preparation, strategy, tactics, etc.
Could you take the basic gameplay and make a decent dogfighting game out of it? Sure, but that was specifically not the intention for Eve. To muddle somewhere in the middle is to create some terrible hybrid game that appeals to no one. If Eve ends up being a failure as a sandbox game, then I think arenas would be a great idea for milking a little more cash out of this particular cow. As it stands, however, all effort should be put towards continuing to make this great experiment that is a space exploration sandbox pvp mmorpg. So far it's pretty ******* awesome, and could continue to get better if the right lessons are learned from the past and applied to the deigns for the future.
It is something to get worked up over. A CCP employee basically said they are exploring the idea, which is cause for alarm.
CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Gibbo5771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
74
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 01:36:00 -
[266] - Quote
I would sooner cut off my own left nut. |

killorbekilled TBE
Initiated
127
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 02:10:00 -
[267] - Quote
its a strong no from me.
eve already offers players the tools to set up there own private duels but in a 'sandy-boxy' kinda way :) TrollorbeTrolled |

Rebel Witch
Yulai Guard 1st Fleet Yulai Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 02:16:00 -
[268] - Quote
Pvp Arena's are a bad bad idea.
However it would be nice to have an option for people to "agree" to pvp while in hisec such as a UI option. One example, Two people want to just test ships out, click his ship, click 'pvp request' , target gets a message that he can agree or not too and the fight can begin, simple and fun. Such requests are usually result of the said two people chatting or talking previously. So instead of having to drop a can, steal from can etc..make it a easy UI option.
When companies give customers more options for their enjoyment without taking away from other customers, everyone wins and CCP makes more money.
|

Lord Wiggin
Furian Necromongers
54
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 03:38:00 -
[269] - Quote
I think I see why so many people are against Arenas. You see it daily in EVE.
The people that are against Arenas are simply too scared to fight a straight up battle.....They always have to have help....
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1977
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 06:51:00 -
[270] - Quote
I think we have differing ideas of what an arena is or could be.
My idea of an arena is simply a combat simulator to help test fittings and should be an extension of the fitting tool. You get blown up, you are back to the fitting screen (the "drawing board"). That's a simple take on a complex issue: we have a lot of conjecture and "calculator warfare" in the realm of fitting and if you have to lose ship after ship to find out if a fit works, then it's a game of "he who has the most $$ for PLEX wins" or "he who has the most time to grind for ISK wins" situation.
Anybody who could be against a combat simulator for the purpose of testing ships and pilots, thinking that it's going to cost them kills, is a pathetic PVPer. So the Noob has to end up in your gate camp and go down in 2 seconds for you to be happy? Noobs need to learn how concentrated firepower can taken down any ship in a manner that does not have them back in the clone vat saying "so, that's EvE Online? Bye bye". If that bothers you, people actually learning to survive before you blap them, then have fun sitting on your gate camp all day and then coming to the forums complaining about a lack of targets and low null/low populations.
The other concept of the arena that continues to come up appears to be something like "real ships, real space" but in a protected or controlled zone, much like the Alliance tournament. Well, if that's that people want, they should have it because they are still going out of their way to lose ships or gain some wins without the usual "blob or get blobbed" and Neutral RR FU asshattery. Can you blame them? If the ATs were perfectly OK such that everybody loves to watch them in HD and gush over the prize ships, then why are smaller scale engagements suddenly a bad idea? Hypocrisy much?
There also appears to be a concept of a WoW type arena system. Well I don't think that, based on the pattern of things seen since 2006, CCP would do it like that. I don't think we will every see a WoW battleground type of setup, complete with capture the flag maps, and "honor points" you can turn in for epics (like LPs for faction goodies?). I don't think that this is even being asked for. But seriously, I can run missions for Federal this or that till my head falls off, and then get nice goodies for it - would it not be more leet to have to earn them in a PVP battlefield?
That's just a question to think about.
They just better not have a CTF map because a spaceship ship a little flag sticking out of it would be too much even for me.
I think the simplest thing is at least a combat simulator to test fits. Half the time I think people either think their ships won't survive more than a minute and don't want to get PWNED badly, and the other half people go into PVP thinking they will last long enough to make a dent, and they get PWNED badly.
In the shooting world, we shoot gourds in front of kids so they know what a bullet can do and prevent them from treating guns like toys. Obviously since internet spaceships is such serious business, some means of knowing what a ship can or cannot do would be helpful.
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
1445
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 07:12:00 -
[271] - Quote
Then test the ship and fit with your friend, like everyone else.
So many excuses.
I tried to remove this sig. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
58
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 07:14:00 -
[272] - Quote
dude...you just re-invented sisi |

Diesel47
painkiller.
340
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 08:44:00 -
[273] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:This idea is disgusting. If it ever happens I will quit with my two accounts and take as many people with me as possible. I hope CCP learned their lesson with Incarna because this would be even worse.
yes. |

Marcus Caspius
87
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 08:57:00 -
[274] - Quote
Toshiroma McDiesel wrote:It's already there, I'd consider RvB to be EVEs arena. Atleast in most ways.
True dat!
Grammatical error and spelling mistakes are included for your entertainment!
|

EvEa Deva
State War Academy Caldari State
157
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 09:30:00 -
[275] - Quote
Low, Null, Wardecs, FW, suicide ganks, corp/alliance, test server, alliance tournament, that other tournament.
I really don't need some A-hole spamming duel requests to everyone that undocks from a trade hub station X100.
Plus it starts an endless nerf/buff/balance whine ( well makes it worse ).
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
1447
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 10:47:00 -
[276] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:I think I see why so many people are against Arenas. You see it daily in EVE. The people that are against Arenas are simply too scared to fight a straight up battle.....They always have to have help.... 
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&view=kills&plt_id=140500&m=12&y=2012
What do you actually see every day on Amarr undock when you kill noobships and pods with your friends, or when you used to blob in null?
It would appear to me that you are the one who is afraid of flying solo out in the wild.
I tried to remove this sig. |

EMPRA
Trident RMBK
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 11:04:00 -
[277] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies.
So true. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
730
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 15:47:00 -
[278] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:This idea is disgusting. If it ever happens I will quit with my two accounts and take as many people with me as possible. I hope CCP learned their lesson with Incarna because this would be even worse.
Maybe I missed another post but, you aren't exactly expressing your ideas why arena is such a bad idea. So, let me throw some out there and maybe you can tell me if I'm understand where you're coming from or not.
Arena is a bad idea because:
1) It'll make pvp safe and therefore people won't want to pvp for real.
I can see the concern here. But, it can be done in such a way as to not draw away people from real pvp. It can have a cost to participate. It can be held in a specific system making it necessary to travel to do it. It can be the home of P2W. No accolades, km's or rewards can be given thereby removing it as status driven activity.
It's never going to drive people out of dangerous space. As long as there's no profit motive for the players, it won't usurp routine player activity in those areas.
I'm truly interested in knowing why arena's, in your opinion, are "disgusting".
2) No risk pvp is lame and for losers.
Oh? Ever go to Sisi? Ever spar with a corp-mate?
3) It's a slippery slope to be more WoW like.
Can't argue with this. But again, if done correctly it's not going to displace residents in dangerous space. You'll still have your pvp there. And arenas won't replace the joy most eve players get from ruining someone else's day. Besides, most, day to day, pvp is about ambushing, not pitting fleets against each other using 17th century battle rules.
If anything, by providing an in game facility to test one's mettle, it should provide richer pvp environments in the long run. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5839
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 15:51:00 -
[279] - Quote
yeah, look at all the other examples of instancing in the game, such as ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. An idea for improving corp management |

baltec1
Bat Country
3391
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 16:13:00 -
[280] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:
If anything, by providing an in game facility to test one's mettle, it should provide richer pvp environments in the long run.
Every other MMO that did this ended up with no pvp outside of arenas. |

Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
237
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 17:45:00 -
[281] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:I think I see why so many people are against Arenas. You see it daily in EVE. The people that are against Arenas are simply too scared to fight a straight up battle.....They always have to have help....  hopefully just joking, but ill answer seriuosly anyways.
No, Arenas would lower pvp in all other parts of the game by so much because "why risk a hotdrop when i can be guaranteed a fair fight?" that the only place to GET pvp would be in an arena, lowsec owuld be EMPTY, null would be EMPTY, people would just hang around highsec doing "pvp" until they are dragged to a tower shoot, then back to highsec.
i live in WH's, i prefer people who want to roam to find pvp, gives me something to chase and taunt (though im personally no good at remembering to web/scram before they warp). |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
188
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 19:19:00 -
[282] - Quote
I think that I must have shouted No, No, No a hundred times and then I had a thought.
Why shouldn't players be allowed to build Acceleration Gates of thier own which point to random spots in system.
Player A could then tell Player B where the gate is and then meet there. This then gives them a small arena of space in which to duel.
And, of course, they can still be scanned down when they are in the pocket of space (and anyone jumping in will jump directly to that spot).
This satisfies those who wish to arrange a scrap of their own, satisfies those who wish to find them and, most important, doesn't break Eve canon.
Make sure that the gates cost the appropriate amount and require the necessary skills. Then we can have a new breed of fight promoters, tournaments or what have we.
But please don't just make an Arena.
- Myfanwy |

killorbekilled TBE
Initiated
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 19:25:00 -
[283] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:masternerdguy wrote:This idea is disgusting. If it ever happens I will quit with my two accounts and take as many people with me as possible. I hope CCP learned their lesson with Incarna because this would be even worse. Maybe I missed another post but, you aren't exactly expressing your ideas why arena is such a bad idea. So, let me throw some out there and maybe you can tell me if I'm understand where you're coming from or not. Arena is a bad idea because: 1) It'll make pvp safe and therefore people won't want to pvp for real. I can see the concern here. But, it can be done in such a way as to not draw away people from real pvp. It can have a cost to participate. It can be held in a specific system making it necessary to travel to do it. It can be the home of P2W. No accolades, km's or rewards can be given thereby removing it as status driven activity. It's never going to drive people out of dangerous space. As long as there's no profit motive for the players, it won't usurp routine player activity in those areas. I'm truly interested in knowing why arena's, in your opinion, are "disgusting". 2) No risk pvp is lame and for losers. Oh? Ever go to Sisi? Ever spar with a corp-mate? 3) It's a slippery slope to be more WoW like. Can't argue with this. But again, if done correctly it's not going to displace residents in dangerous space. You'll still have your pvp there. And arenas won't replace the joy most eve players get from ruining someone else's day. Besides, most, day to day, pvp is about ambushing, not pitting fleets against each other using 17th century battle rules. If anything, by providing an in game facility to test one's mettle, it should provide richer pvp environments in the long run.
because just no ....
TrollorbeTrolled |

Cambarus
Aliastra Gallente Federation
227
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 23:57:00 -
[284] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote: An arena would more likely see PvP instead of the current PvPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP we see now.
Now? People have been referring to eve's pvp as pvppppppp since I started playing at the very least, and that was back in 06. And again, this comes down to this: If you dislike one of the core aspects of the game, then you don't really like eve.
Marlona Sky wrote: That is an asinine statement. Just because someone has an issue with an aspect of the game does not equate to them not liking the game. I don't like how the local channel is used, but does that mean I hate EVE? Of course not. If I did I would not be playing.
It really isn't. We're not talking about some small issue here, like a balance aspect or a certain ship class. We're talking about one of the core, central aspects of the game. Not liking how eve pvp works at its core is like not liking that eve is a spaceship game; if you dislike one, you dislike the game as a whole, and what you REALLY want is something superficially LIKE eve.
As for the issue of what it would do to people pvping, consider this:
Every person who decides to start pvping in arenas will likely stop pvping in open space. It has been said many times in this thread that people who prey on pvpers with no skill are lame, but what about the people who shoot said predators? And the people who shoot those people? Fewer people in open pvp means less targets for EVERYONE, which in turn makes arenas that more attractive, pulling more people away from open pvp etc.
Without targets floating around there goes the thrill of the hunt, the quickened pulse, the shaky hands that start up BECAUSE you know damn well that this fight may well be a trap and you know damn well that one way or another, it won't be fair. That's what makes eve's pvp great. You want fair? Go play something else, because of all the things that eve is, fair 'aint one of 'em.
|

YuuKnow
Inner 5phere
506
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 00:11:00 -
[285] - Quote
The only place I really see arena's fitting in is if they were incorporated into faction warfar.
Perhaps a couple of warpgates that led to the same combat area and landed at random spots into a Alliance Tournament style arena where tatical warping was limited and slowboat and MW were the principal propulsion inside. Somewhere in the arena a Faction Warfare specific target/control point was located and the two factions vying for control of it.
yk |

Opertone
Aurora Empire Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
201
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 10:15:00 -
[286] - Quote
I suggest virtual arenas with bets and tournaments... All arranged from inside stations.
Virtual - emulation, special environment where you can not run away or interfere with others. |

March rabbit
Aliastra
294
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 10:43:00 -
[287] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies. natural selection ans stuff?  |

Meryl SinGarda
Daisy Cutter's The Irukandji
709
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 10:47:00 -
[288] - Quote
For arenas to work, it would have to not detract from regular PVP that already happens.
CEO of B.U.T.T.
|

March rabbit
Aliastra
294
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 11:01:00 -
[289] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:The idea isn't without merit, but would have to be done very carefully in a game such as Eve.
I would like to see us provide more and better support and tools for those players who are running or want to run their own tournaments and leagues. I think the Alliance Tournaments and New Eden Open have proved there's a place for sporting events in a game like Eve, and those kind of events are even better when they are player initiated and run. You do realize if the griefers in this game can't interfere with this thing, if players are running them, they will nerd rage so hard. you said it like griefers are someone you would listen  and why care about their whine? |

Alrione
Black Lagoon Inc.
268
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 11:30:00 -
[290] - Quote
This is the worst idea ever. No. Just, no. |

March rabbit
Aliastra
294
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 12:58:00 -
[291] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:AKilla Sunday wrote: It's funny how almost everyone against it hints at the fact they will not be able to pray on the weak and lame. No we don't like it because arenas have killed the pvp outside of them in every game they were put into. some people say those games was killed by goons and not by some mythical arenas or....  |

Valleria Darkmoon
No Salvation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 13:34:00 -
[292] - Quote
highonpop wrote:Ocih wrote:baltec1 wrote:Every time an arena is added to an MMO all the other pvp dies. You do realize it's dead in EVE too? An Arena wouldn't stop the T1 Industrial farming at low sec bottlenecks or PvE fit kill mails in anoms. Outside of those and random roaming kills, there is no PvP in EVE. not to be mean. but you're an idiot pvp is dead? do you follow eve-kill.net? do you follow battleclinic's killboard? pvp is alive and well. just because you can't think outside the box you've put your small brain inside, doesn't mean pvp is dead.
The only people who really think PvP or even solo is dead are those without the courage to really go and look. Forget the mountain of killboards to back up the idea that PvP happens all the time and the dev post about how a ship has exploded once every 6 seconds while the server has been active. Everyone who uses the map and is REALLY looking for players to shoot never seems to have any trouble finding fights. Granted once you get into a populated system you have to size up the situation and possibly bait or otherwise setup a favorable outcome and it can sometimes take a while but you can certainly get it done. Arenas would dumb it all the way down to the point where anyone with a mouse can click the giant red button and bypass their incompetence for at least as long as it takes to get into the arena.
I find the players tag themselves with the term PvP far too easily in this game. About 40% of the kills I've ever gotten never even locked me much less fired a shot and 90% of those were in corps that "do PvP", perhaps they missed the meeting. These are ships that are combat capable and fitted no less, I do not farm haulers (not to say you are safe from me in one). Lose the fear and go for it rather than insisting you have to be told what to expect at all times. Try this: commit yourself to losing some ships in PvP AND commit yourself to dying in a GLORIOUS fire. Don't just warp to grid, get tackled before you warp back out again and meekly try to escape and end up dying in a fire that could easily be overshadowed by lighting a fart . You might even win and you might even like it. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
109
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 13:47:00 -
[293] - Quote
YuuKnow wrote:The only place I really see arena's fitting in is if they were incorporated into faction warfar.
Perhaps a couple of warpgates that led to the same combat area and landed at random spots into a Alliance Tournament style arena where tatical warping was limited and slowboat and MW were the principal propulsion inside. Somewhere in the arena a Faction Warfare specific target/control point was located and the two factions vying for control of it.
yk
It's alreadu so. FW plexes. |

Valleria Darkmoon
No Salvation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 13:48:00 -
[294] - Quote
Meryl SinGarda wrote:For arenas to work, it would have to not detract from regular PVP that already happens.
Seems impossible to me.
If you are fighting in arenas you are not fighting elsewhere. Lots of people will be attracted by the ease of it and will leave other PvP behind. It seems to me that if you wanted to kill normal PvP in EVE, arenas are the fastest and easiest way to do it. Sov warfare and whatnot will likely not really change much but the small gang scene would pretty much completely dry up and all those great videos that have come out throughout the years would dry up as well.
Lots of people have posted large scale fleet fight videos but has anyone ever really been interested in watching one? There are far too many people there for me to give a rat's ass what happens to anyone in particular and I give less than a rat's ass which entity wins. No one is going to do anything that stands out as awesome. It's just going to be boring television, on par with bad reception.
Sure you could post arena footage but it would get really routine really quickly and is less exciting to watch because you know no one else is going to show up unexpectedly. It will get especially boring when the ridiculously overtanked fits show up, trust me it would happen an awful lot. When I was in Heretics I lost track of the number of 1v1s people in corp won while taking 20 mins to do it because they had to run a zero dps fit with a full cargo bay out of cap charges, or had to call a draw because they ran out of ammo.
I can't imagine arenas could ever be good for the PvP lifestyle. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
735
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 15:18:00 -
[295] - Quote
Valleria Darkmoon wrote: The only people who really think PvP or even solo is dead are those without the courage to really go and look.
Wrong in so many ways. Allow me to rephrase that for you. The only people who think solo pvp is still alive are the folks who can spend 6 hours a day 7 days a week looking for it. The reality is, if you go looking for it "solo", you're chances of running into a gate camp, a blob and other various superior forces are much higher than finding a solo, matched fight. Anyone who has actually gone out there looking for the good solo fight knows this to which I must conclude you have not. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

March rabbit
Aliastra
296
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 16:04:00 -
[296] - Quote
Valleria Darkmoon wrote:Meryl SinGarda wrote:For arenas to work, it would have to not detract from regular PVP that already happens. Seems impossible to me. If you are fighting in arenas you are not fighting elsewhere. Lots of people will be attracted by the ease of it and will leave other PvP behind. It seems to me that if you wanted to kill normal PvP in EVE, arenas are the fastest and easiest way to do it. Sov warfare and whatnot will likely not really change much but the small gang scene would pretty much completely dry up and all those great videos that have come out throughout the years would dry up as well. you completely ignore players who don't do "normal PvP in Eve" (you sure we can use "normal" here?). Reasons are different but those players DON"T DO IT already. And if arena can get them to PvP (it will get me at least, see below) - i guess this would help the whole game to become more interesting.
And yes, i have killboard stats. And yes, 30+ kills for last month but this is not PvP. This is KM whoring  Why i don't do PvP? Because i see how "experienced PvPers" do it. You fight one - you fight logi/bumper/booster/etc.... You get someone to "1vs1" and get suspect to start action somewhere near far planet? Fool! Some "neutrals" warp in when you already pointed and kill you. You don't need to leave major trade hubs to see it.
However should we have PvP you can be proud of - i would play it. I've tried 1vs1 when it was possible. Killed someone, got killed several times. It is fun.
So i guess many "bears" will do - try "PvP". |

Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
496
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 16:11:00 -
[297] - Quote
Hi all.
Again EvE is mmo for mass, a unique game where no solo pvp in general and no small scale instant pvp, game that force you to pay atention and thinking, thats all, people know this and they mention arenas, simple.
No need to wrote poem about this, everyone know ... EvE isn't game, its style of living. |

Renan Ruivo
Vera Cruz. Nulli Secunda
920
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 16:48:00 -
[298] - Quote
Yes please. I love betting in sports events, and if i can bet ISK in EVE all the better. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |

Nex apparatu5
Friendship is Podding Test Alliance Please Ignore
404
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 17:02:00 -
[299] - Quote
And while we're at it, let's introduce a PVP flag. If you're going to let pvpers pick their fights and PvP in complete safety, why not let PVErs? |

Ares Desideratus
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 17:14:00 -
[300] - Quote
It just doesn't make sense to NOT have arenas.
It doesn't have to be for large scale battles. "Safe" or "legitimate" 1v1s in a high-sec arena would not break PvP.
There is no reason to not have them lore or storywise.
The game just doesn't make sense without them, it's like, why the **** wouldn't a game with as much combat as Eve have an arena?
The people saying "No," and "Oh it's a bad idea," are seriously ********. You don't have to use the arena if you don't like it. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2160
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 17:24:00 -
[301] - Quote
Ares Desideratus wrote:It just doesn't make sense to NOT have arenas.
It doesn't have to be for large scale battles. "Safe" or "legitimate" 1v1s in a high-sec arena would not break PvP.
There is no reason to not have them lore or storywise.
The game just doesn't make sense without them, it's like, why the **** wouldn't a game with as much combat as Eve have an arena?
The people saying "No," and "Oh it's a bad idea," are seriously ********. You don't have to use the arena if you don't like it. Instanced and sealed off activities have no place in Eve. There is literally no activity in which a 3rd party cannot interfere or force themselves into, for fun or profit.
The entire point of an arena system is to seal the fight off so it's "fair". That is simply not something that has a place in Eve. This is without even mentioning the fact that there is no "fair" because there are inherent ship imbalances that can only be mitigated via teamwork and non-instanced fighting (system games, etc).
The only thing that makes sense is a way to initiate and verify the outcome of limited engagements. A fleet becoming aggressed to another fleet, with a summary of kills after 10 minutes, for example. If accessible via the API, this could very easily lead to player-run arenas, tournaments, betting, etc. It would do this via player interaction and providing tools for the sandbox (the Eve way), not via instanced "forced" PvP. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Ares Desideratus
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
33
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 17:54:00 -
[302] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Ares Desideratus wrote:It just doesn't make sense to NOT have arenas.
It doesn't have to be for large scale battles. "Safe" or "legitimate" 1v1s in a high-sec arena would not break PvP.
There is no reason to not have them lore or storywise.
The game just doesn't make sense without them, it's like, why the **** wouldn't a game with as much combat as Eve have an arena?
The people saying "No," and "Oh it's a bad idea," are seriously ********. You don't have to use the arena if you don't like it. Instanced and sealed off activities have no place in Eve. There is literally no activity in which a 3rd party cannot interfere or force themselves into, for fun or profit. The entire point of an arena system is to seal the fight off so it's "fair". That is simply not something that has a place in Eve. This is without even mentioning the fact that there is no "fair" because there are inherent ship imbalances that can only be mitigated via teamwork and non-instanced fighting (system games, etc). The only thing that makes sense is a way to initiate and verify the outcome of limited engagements. A fleet becoming aggressed to another fleet, with a summary of kills after 10 minutes, for example. If accessible via the API, this could very easily lead to player-run arenas, tournaments, betting, etc. It would do this via player interaction and providing tools for the sandbox (the Eve way), not via instanced "forced" PvP. You've changed me way of looking at it. Thank you. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
10916
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 18:18:00 -
[303] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Instanced and sealed off activities have no place in Eve. There is literally no activity in which a 3rd party cannot interfere or force themselves into, for fun or profit.
The entire point of an arena system is to seal the fight off so it's "fair". That is simply not something that has a place in Eve. This is without even mentioning the fact that there is no "fair" because there are inherent ship imbalances that can only be mitigated via teamwork and non-instanced fighting (system games, etc).
The only thing that makes sense is a way to initiate and verify the outcome of limited engagements. A fleet becoming aggressed to another fleet, with a summary of kills after 10 minutes, for example. If accessible via the API, this could very easily lead to player-run arenas, tournaments, betting, etc. It would do this via player interaction and providing tools for the sandbox (the Eve way), not via instanced "forced" PvP. This. Not a bad idea regards the APi.
But let's face it, Eve is already one big arena.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2161
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 18:26:00 -
[304] - Quote
Mag's wrote:This. Not a bad idea regards the APi.
But let's face it, Eve is already one big arena. It is, but the way its PvP documentation currently works makes it a bit prohibitive for organized tournaments / betting games / etc, due to some contributors being ommitted (logi, fleet boosters, etc), and due to it not providing some context for the kill.
More comprehensive verifiable combat logs, complete killmails, and verification of how/why the fight happened (gank vs. agreed fight vs. whatever else) would be great for the ability of 3rd party devs to create things like ranked tournaments.
I have myself looked at the possibility of doing something like this, but put it off due to the amount of work and documentation it would take from the duelists, plus the amount of faith it takes on my side to know that there was nothing shady involved in the kill. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
10916
|
Posted - 2012.12.24 19:37:00 -
[305] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Mag's wrote:This. Not a bad idea regards the APi.
But let's face it, Eve is already one big arena. It is, but the way its PvP documentation currently works makes it a bit prohibitive for organized tournaments / betting games / etc, due to some contributors being ommitted (logi, fleet boosters, etc), and due to it not providing some context for the kill. More comprehensive verifiable combat logs, complete killmails, and verification of how/why the fight happened (gank vs. agreed fight vs. whatever else) would be great for the ability of 3rd party devs to create things like ranked tournaments. I have myself looked at the possibility of doing something like this, but put it off due to the amount of work and documentation it would take from the duelists, plus the amount of faith it takes on my side to know that there was nothing shady involved in the kill. Well yes I agree to an extent, but arenas per se are not something I think will work.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Ghazu
338
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 02:53:00 -
[306] - Quote
Well, arenas won't be so bad if done correctly. Some ground rules. There will be absolutely no spawning of ships/things, you must buy it off the market hub like everything else in eve.
what I envision the arena zone: - opportunities for combatants to participate matches of 5 vs 5 or 10 vs 10 etc. - opportunities for marketeers to seed new market hubs to supply the combatants
Because 2 main events a year is not enough. http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984 |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
3060
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 19:08:00 -
[307] - Quote
If you are too coward to arrange a duel with the current mechanics then you have no business playing this game.
Arenas can get out and stay out. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ (my spaceblog) http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.co.uk/~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Max Doobie
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 20:42:00 -
[308] - Quote
Wiggins is a WOW Dev...
"Hey it destroyed US, so it should work on the competition, right?". |

Sarah Schneider
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
1639
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:04:00 -
[309] - Quote
No.
The way it is now, in the world of Eve, almost every aspect of gameplay that took place outside of a station can be interrupted by other players, be it PVE or PVP, there are no "exclusive instances" apart from game wide events. That's the beauty of sandbox, and that means that it's also one of the reason why some people keep playing this game.
TL;DR, Unless there's still a way for a 3rd party to go in and sh*t all over the so mentioned "Arena" or If CCP manage to formulate an idea that incorporates an "Arena" without going outside the sandbox concept, then it's a 'maybe' from me. How to : Playing Eve 100% Risk and Conflict FREE! |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2058
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:07:00 -
[310] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:If you are too coward to arrange a duel with the current mechanics then you have no business playing this game.
Arenas can get out and stay out. They don't net to :getout: if they were never in. Let's hope this is the case. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Sarah Schneider
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
1639
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:15:00 -
[311] - Quote
Ares Desideratus wrote:It just doesn't make sense to NOT have arenas.
It doesn't have to be for large scale battles. "Safe" or "legitimate" 1v1s in a high-sec arena would not break PvP.
There is no reason to not have them lore or storywise.
The game just doesn't make sense without them, it's like, why the **** wouldn't a game with as much combat as Eve have an arena?
The people saying "No," and "Oh it's a bad idea," are seriously ********. You don't have to use the arena if you don't like it. Eve is a sandbox. Arena is an exclusive instance where X number of players fights Y numbers without intervention from outside source. It shouldn't exist in a sandbox concept and should never be. Players should be the one who determine whether something is "fair", who won, who lose, what are the rules and there should always be a way for an outside party to bash and f*ck up the entire process. That is what Eve is about.
If the concept of an Arena could accommodate those things, then yes, perhaps it may work, but then again, if that was the case, it's not exactly an "Arena" is it? How to : Playing Eve 100% Risk and Conflict FREE! |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2059
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:20:00 -
[312] - Quote
Sarah Schneider wrote:Eve is a sandbox. Arena is an exclusive instance where X number of players fights Y numbers without intervention from outside source. It shouldn't exist in a sandbox concept and should never be. Players should be the one who determine whether something is "fair", who won, who lose, what are the rules and there should always be a way for an outside party to bash and f*ck up the entire process. That is what Eve is about.
If the concept of an Arena could accommodate those things, then yes, perhaps it may work, but then again, if that was the case, it's not exactly an "Arena" is it?
PS: With no disrespect towards the devs who considered the idea, I've only got one question regarding this topic. Is Eve a sandbox, or is it not? EVE is a highsec, security comes from NPCs and NPC corp mechanics.
Arenas fit right in. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

baltec1
Bat Country
3441
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:35:00 -
[313] - Quote
Ares Desideratus wrote:It just doesn't make sense to NOT have arenas.
It doesn't have to be for large scale battles. "Safe" or "legitimate" 1v1s in a high-sec arena would not break PvP.
There is no reason to not have them lore or storywise.
The game just doesn't make sense without them, it's like, why the **** wouldn't a game with as much combat as Eve have an arena?
The people saying "No," and "Oh it's a bad idea," are seriously ********. You don't have to use the arena if you don't like it.
The problem is that when arenas are added they remove the pvp from everywhere else in the game. Why go hunting when you can get a fight at the click of a button with no chance of getting blobbed? The more that join the arena the less targets out in the rest of the game so more join the arena to get fights.
Its happened in every single MMO that has added them and will happen here too. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
3081
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 21:36:00 -
[314] - Quote
I'd love to have risk free safe-spots where me and my alt can idle all we like. That doesn't sound broken at all. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ (my spaceblog) http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.co.uk/~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Umega
Solis Mensa
119
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 22:17:00 -
[315] - Quote
Too many valid points already stated as to why 'No'. And I agree.. isolated, game mechanic controled 'Arena' is a terrible idea for EVE.
The people that I think welcome the idea are people that are tired of being ganked by numbers, running around low/null/wh. And people that are tired of finding 1v1 anywhere on the map, only to have the result skew'd by RR or fleet booster alt.
One thing people love about sports.. is the statistics. I think Killmails should be more elaborate on what/who else is effecting the outcome. Couple this with having the varies 3rd party killboard sites implement these 'outside' factors into the rankings. It also provides intel.. (which bothers me, I admit.. as I believe such intel should be found within the game itself).
On-grid boosting, coupled with fleet boosting working the same as RR when transfering crimewatch flags.. would help promote more legit '1v1' (and make for more expensive boomboom). This would make would make things more interesting, and entertaining imo.. from high to null. But yeah, I get it.. dream on as the rl monetary value of off-grid alt boosting is too high for CCP. Although..
This is EVE.. and whether people want to admit to it or not, the risk/reward ratio with having/using off-grid alt fleet boosters is WAAAAY to swayed on the reward side with next to little, or even zero.. Risk. That is Not EVE. |

baltec1
Bat Country
3442
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 23:35:00 -
[316] - Quote
Umega wrote:
This is EVE.. and whether people want to admit to it or not, the risk/reward ratio with having/using off-grid alt fleet boosters is WAAAAY to swayed on the reward side with next to little, or even zero.. Risk. That is Not EVE.
Soon there will be no off grid boosting |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
161
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 01:32:00 -
[317] - Quote
My solution to the problem at hand is wormholes. Get a few friends together, drop down a hole and see what will bite. It can be done in fairly cheap ships which will still pose significant threat to well-prepared inhabitants. If you are worried about implants, do the mission grind and get a Jump Clone. On the other hand, now that we have a Limited Engagement mechanic it wouldn't be a bad idea to give people a simple duelling option instead of fiddling with cans. I'd find it more immersive to respond to a personal challenge then to litter Hek spouting obscenities in local. |

Ares Desideratus
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
50
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 02:45:00 -
[318] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Sarah Schneider wrote:Eve is a sandbox. Arena is an exclusive instance where X number of players fights Y numbers without intervention from outside source. It shouldn't exist in a sandbox concept and should never be. Players should be the one who determine whether something is "fair", who won, who lose, what are the rules and there should always be a way for an outside party to bash and f*ck up the entire process. That is what Eve is about.
If the concept of an Arena could accommodate those things, then yes, perhaps it may work, but then again, if that was the case, it's not exactly an "Arena" is it?
PS: With no disrespect towards the devs who considered the idea, I've only got one question regarding this topic. Is Eve a sandbox, or is it not? EVE is a highsec, security comes from NPCs and NPC corp mechanics. Arenas fit right in. R Maybe he's right though - and maybe some V group of players should make their own arena. B
Get it done mah fahs |

Sean Parisi
Project Cerberus Caldari State Capturing
71
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 07:08:00 -
[319] - Quote
Its called the alliance tournament. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2072
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 07:20:00 -
[320] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Umega wrote:This is EVE.. and whether people want to admit to it or not, the risk/reward ratio with having/using off-grid alt fleet boosters is WAAAAY to swayed on the reward side with next to little, or even zero.. Risk. That is Not EVE. Soon there will be no off grid boosting  Ongrid neutral alt on the jita 4-4 undock boosting ! Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
194
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 10:16:00 -
[321] - Quote
OP. Why not have duellist A and duellist B join the same corporation.
Have one of them zoom to somewhere in the system, make a bookmark and then tell the other to come for a scrap behind the galactic bikesheds?
It worked for us when we were at school and it should work in New Eden.
There. Nothing needs to be fixed. It's all here already. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1529
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 10:18:00 -
[322] - Quote
Ares Desideratus wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Sarah Schneider wrote:Eve is a sandbox. Arena is an exclusive instance where X number of players fights Y numbers without intervention from outside source. It shouldn't exist in a sandbox concept and should never be. Players should be the one who determine whether something is "fair", who won, who lose, what are the rules and there should always be a way for an outside party to bash and f*ck up the entire process. That is what Eve is about.
If the concept of an Arena could accommodate those things, then yes, perhaps it may work, but then again, if that was the case, it's not exactly an "Arena" is it?
PS: With no disrespect towards the devs who considered the idea, I've only got one question regarding this topic. Is Eve a sandbox, or is it not? EVE is a highsec, security comes from NPCs and NPC corp mechanics. Arenas fit right in. R Maybe he's right though - and maybe some V group of players should make their own arena. B Get it done mah fahs
I've offered to start an arena that would run 23.5/7, Unfortunately no one was interested. It's about time CCP stops catering to the lazy players with this sense of entitlement for fear of losing money. These aren't the people making the game better, these are the people wanting you to turn EVE in to a game that is like most other MMO's. |

Abu Shahid
0.0 Axis Fleet Stealth Syndicate
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 10:45:00 -
[323] - Quote
Dev-organized loss-free PvP arenas are a terrible idea and should be stopped. EVE PvP is greatest when it is the outcome of natural events and politics, as advertised in CCPs many marketing campaigns. Giving tools or spectator slots for players to view the biggest 0.0 battles would add dimension to EVE, and allow more people to become part of the ever-growing story that is EVE. |

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
4636
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 11:16:00 -
[324] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
'Manipulate' the suspect system? I think not. It's using the suspect system as intended. It works quite well actually and has revitalized pvp in high sec and made it fun again.
Who frakkin' wants to ensure a 1v1? I don't. I want to be able to solo pvp outside of the crimewatch system, but if someone wants to surprise me by bringing in logi - then good on them. I want my pvp spur of the moment, not have to go to some arena to 'arrange' a match.
*GLOMP* with your AltGäó-á |

Az Tek
BREAKING-POINT Primal Force
4548
|
Posted - 2012.12.26 11:28:00 -
[325] - Quote
BoSau Hotim wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
'Manipulate' the suspect system? I think not. It's using the suspect system as intended. It works quite well actually and has revitalized pvp in high sec and made it fun again. Who frakkin' wants to ensure a 1v1? I don't. I want to be able to solo pvp outside of the crimewatch system, but if someone wants to surprise me by bringing in logi - then good on them. I want my pvp spur of the moment, not have to go to some arena to 'arrange' a match.
^ this. Gÿú Client Manipulation: Overview Settings - Color coding and more Gÿú Gÿú Client Manipulation: Master Client Settings - Global Between Alts Gÿú Gÿú Client Manipulation: SettingsPCK Gÿú |

RichtPaul
Shadow Corporation Confederacy
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 04:13:00 -
[326] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
Allow for betting. +1
It's a good way for high seccers to get a taste of solo or gang PVP warfare. |

Wescro
Knights of the New Order
12
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 04:31:00 -
[327] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
There is no reason why the current game mechanics can not allow for players to set up such a system themselves. A dedicated NPC protected, NPC moderated, NPC controlled, NPC organized arena is not in the spirit of Eve. Let the players manage to carve their on destiny. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1115
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 04:42:00 -
[328] - Quote
Abu Shahid wrote:Dev-organized loss-free PvP arenas are a terrible idea and should be stopped. EVE PvP is greatest when it is the outcome of natural events and politics, as advertised in CCPs many marketing campaigns. Giving tools or spectator slots for players to view the biggest 0.0 battles would add dimension to EVE, and allow more people to become part of the ever-growing story that is EVE.
I would be all for giving dedicated reporting organizations GM style ships that could zip into big fleet fights and broadcast them. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1115
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 04:44:00 -
[329] - Quote
Wescro wrote:Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
There is no reason why the current game mechanics can not allow for players to set up such a system themselves. A dedicated NPC protected, NPC moderated, NPC controlled, NPC organized arena is not in the spirit of Eve. Let the players manage to carve their on destiny.
Players already do this. Goonswarm's squads often do T1 thunderdomes, and 1v1 matches. Razor alliances runs it's own yearly alliance tournament. We once did a "Newbie Hunger Games" where bitter vets could sponsor a newbie by warping on field with a repping ship for 10 seconds, or send them mods that would make their ships more powerful. |

Valleria Darkmoon
No Salvation
49
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 07:55:00 -
[330] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Valleria Darkmoon wrote: The only people who really think PvP or even solo is dead are those without the courage to really go and look.
Wrong in so many ways. Allow me to rephrase that for you. The only people who think solo pvp is still alive are the folks who can spend 6 hours a day 7 days a week looking for it. The reality is, if you go looking for it "solo", you're chances of running into a gate camp, a blob and other various superior forces are much higher than finding a solo, matched fight. Anyone who has actually gone out there looking for the good solo fight knows this to which I must conclude you have not.
I've lived in low sec for a very long time and it rarely takes me more than 5-7 jumps to find a fight, if that takes you 6 hours you're doing it wrong. They're not all epic fights where I kill 12 guys and warp out in structure and I don't always win. When I said you can solo I mean you can get in a ship and head out looking for trouble without joining a fleet first. You can't control what others bring but you have better control over your situation when they are all on grid. Too many people lose their nerve and warp out easily but one of the safest places to have your enemy is on a clean grid and beyond the range they are set to hit. I understand the desire to get away when you see 12 guys yellow/red boxing you but if you're not taking damage let them, who cares. See what comes for you, maybe some of them you can beat by yourself.
I'd be lying if I said I could solo 12 guys at once and also when separating a superior force many of the kills you will get are not even. Battlecruisers are pretty strong compared to a T1 frigate but they are the ones you are likely to catch chasing you away from their friends. In fact many of the kills you get while solo are precisely because your pursuer is confident and less cautious because he feels he has you outnumbered and doesn't actually have the ability to survive when he finds out he's much closer to alone than he thought. As for asking for a 1v1 most of them are honored in my experience, although everyone seems to feel that they won't be. The main problem with this is that you almost always get an opponent who shows up in some ridiculously overtanked, 100 dps pile of garbage and consumes all of your ammo in the time it takes to kill him which is why I prefer to blow up ships in front of their friends. Arenas will certainly not help this last problem and I feel it would be much more likely to amplify it and you'll end up with multiple fights where each person who shows up can perma tank the opposition. In short I predict it would simply be the new equivalent of high sec docking games |

Karrl Tian
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 08:01:00 -
[331] - Quote
I thought Nullsec was the arena. People certainly aren't going there for PvE.  |

Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
412
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 08:13:00 -
[332] - Quote
No, not necessary with new crime watch and bounties.
|

Valleria Darkmoon
No Salvation
49
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 08:15:00 -
[333] - Quote
I should add at this point that we did run Frigfest a few months back in Amamake and tons of people showed up to fight there in their frigates, some were ganks on people fighting at a belt, some pilots blobbed and some people showed up to safe up and challenge people to 1v1 where they'd join fleet and have their opponent warp to them. Hundreds of kills and nearly 10 billion ISK worth of frigates (and other stuff) died that week, frigate pilots would even call a truce to gang up on people who brought in battlecruisers and other such things to spoil it and the BC would quickly find itself being destroyed by 7 frigates with their e-war keeping them all alive. If you were interested in a frigate 1v1 there was absolutely no excuse for not finding it an Amamake that week. I even promised not to shoot any pods that lost a frigate and I didn't in the interest of keeping participation high and I didn't kill a single one. There was a killboard for the event exclusively and you can look it up if you like, tons of solo "fair" fights to be had there.
If you posted about needing arenas and you didn't show up to that event, give your head a shake, although there were some shennanigans, 95% of the combat that week was on the level and if you lose a T1 frigate how many tears are you really going to shed over it? Or are arenas supposed to be restricted to high sec only so that CONCORD can do what we could not? Namely promising your safety until you get into your deathmatch. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2223
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 08:41:00 -
[334] - Quote
Valleria Darkmoon wrote:If you posted about needing arenas and you didn't show up to that event, give your head a shake. Although there were some shennanigans, 95% of the combat that week was on the level and if you lose a T1 frigate how many tears are you really going to shed over it? Or are arenas supposed to be restricted to high sec only so that CONCORD can do what we could not? Namely promising your safety until you get into your deathmatch. CONCORD <3 oh so reliable ~ and dependable ~ CONCORD you're our love ~ Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

destiny2
57
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 10:26:00 -
[335] - Quote
why go to a arena, when you can just fly in some random alliances space, and demand, a battle.
sheesh poster is trying to make this game like World Of WarCrap. |

Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
245
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 11:52:00 -
[336] - Quote
I would love to see a CCP in-game tool helping players to organize small-size tournaments, like these internal frigates-tournament that a lots of corps have, now that Retribution has been released.
Not something that prevent losses -see, even for the alliance tournament, it's 'real' stuff-, I thought of something more practical like points count, and so on. After years and years of research around ice mining, they finally found how to make snowballs again :D |

Ares Desideratus
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
59
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 12:33:00 -
[337] - Quote
destiny2 wrote:why go to a arena, when you can just fly in some random alliances space, and demand, a battle. sheesh poster is trying to make this game like World Of WarCrap.  Idunno, sometimes I think you guys are just Eve Hipsters and that there would actually be nothing wrong with a legit 1v1 system in high-sec. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
677
|
Posted - 2012.12.27 14:11:00 -
[338] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. No.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Nessa Aldeen
The Sword and The Shield
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 12:29:00 -
[339] - Quote
Those who are saying 'NAY' are not reading the context of the OP. Read slowly, and not read it like an FB post.
You keep going on and on about pvp already exists. Everyone who signed up on EVE knows this.
What is proposed is legitimate spectator sport and induce betting and gambling. That is entertainment pvp. You still LOSE ships AND Iskies albeit through entertainment. Hopefully this will also attract hi sec dwellers/risk adverse players to pvp and eventually be motivated to go into low and null. |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
234
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 13:17:00 -
[340] - Quote
Ares Desideratus wrote:destiny2 wrote:why go to a arena, when you can just fly in some random alliances space, and demand, a battle. sheesh poster is trying to make this game like World Of WarCrap.  Idunno, sometimes I think you guys are just Eve Hipsters and that there would actually be nothing wrong with a legit 1v1 system in high-sec.
There is. Join in the same corp and set to one and another.
It's there. Use it.
As the philosopher Roger Waters almost wrote "We don't need no arenas" |

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
234
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 13:20:00 -
[341] - Quote
Nessa Aldeen wrote:Those who are saying 'NAY' are not reading the context of the OP. Read slowly, and not read it like an FB post.
You keep going on and on about pvp already exists. Everyone who signed up on EVE knows this.
What is proposed is legitimate spectator sport and induce betting and gambling. That is entertainment pvp. You still LOSE ships AND Iskies albeit through entertainment. Hopefully this will also attract hi sec dwellers/risk adverse players to pvp and eventually be motivated to go into low and null.
Sigh. You can still do that today.
You read the umpteen other posts hereabouts on how this sort of thing is already done.
All the combatants have to do is to join the same Corporation for the duration and then let others bet on it. I'd run the book myself if there is any interest but arenas are not, repeat not, needed at all.
The game mecahnics are there. Use them.
Can we stop this High Sec Arena bleating because sooner or later I am going to start saying WoW and EQ are over there somewhere soon? |

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
400
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 13:25:00 -
[342] - Quote
Abu Shahid wrote:Dev-organized loss-free PvP arenas are a terrible idea and should be stopped. EVE PvP is greatest when it is the outcome of natural events and politics, as advertised in CCPs many marketing campaigns. Giving tools or spectator slots for players to view the biggest 0.0 battles would add dimension to EVE, and allow more people to become part of the ever-growing story that is EVE. i've been there. i've seen that.
So you really sure someone will enjoy watching sitting hordes of ships in station/next to Titan for hours? Or someone will enjoy watching not-happened battle because one side "smartly" decided to not engage?
0.0 blob battles are fun sometimes. But it is really rare case for side spectator.
And about politics and story of Eve..... Well.... This is story for sure. But not sure if this would catch someone outside of those 0.0 alliances making it. After all there is no difference if BOB is dominated, or goonswarm is dominated. or some other alliance is dominated in 0.0. From outside these are just different names. |

Ath'daru
Ordo Drakonis Nulli Secunda
2
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 13:26:00 -
[343] - Quote
Lord Wiggin wrote:Put Arenas in the major hubs, allow players to arrange matches. Televise the match's in local and perhaps in CQ's. (I want my remote CCP) Set up a betting system, with the house taking a cut. Part of the house cut goes to Isk prizes for the winner, based on a percentage of the take, so that the betting interest in the match directly affects the payout. Isk sink....
I was never in favor of Arenas, I felt they would be game breaking, but after watching people attempt to manipulate the suspect system to get 1 vs 1 day after day, maybe it's time. Outside of an Arena, there is no way to ensure a 1 vs 1. This solves the issue, provides passive entertainment for the couch potato/ship spinner types, as well as an isk sink. With the number of gambling sites run by players, isn't it time CCP got in on the action?
******** idea. |

Santo Trafficante
the united Negative Ten.
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 13:37:00 -
[344] - Quote
Heeey homie ........ thats sum bad shiet idea dudah,stop teasin' and get breathin' |

baltec1
Bat Country
4544
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 15:14:00 -
[345] - Quote
Santo Trafficante wrote:Heeey homie ........ thats sum bad shiet idea dudah,stop teasin' and get breathin' Did anyone else read this in jar jars voice? |

Jim Hazard
Scrubfleet
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 17:50:00 -
[346] - Quote
I would definetly say no to "public" arenas, which can be entered at any time by random ppl to fight it out 1v1, because it just does not fit into eve. The day to day PvP in EvE should never ever take place in arenas.
A tool to help people host tournaments is a different story though.
I would guess it does not even need to be a complicated thing.
Basically all you need is an extra window to create tournaments and to participate in the tournaments. If you could just shedule matches and the participants automatically get transfered into an arena (like in the ally tournament) and get transfered back once the time is over.
A few checkboxes for certain rule options, for example:
- Shiptypes - Max Meta Level - Max Pilots per team - max points per team (each ship getting a certain fixed value for all tournaments) - checkboxes for implant types that are allowed
The system of course would need to be able to automatically scan ship fittings and implants, but i guess that should not really be a big deal.
Basically an automated system that can do what the CCP staff does when they host tournaments. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow C.L.O.N.E.
1025
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 17:52:00 -
[347] - Quote
Jim Hazard wrote:I would definetly say no to "public" arenas, which can be entered at any time by random ppl to fight it out 1v1, because it just does not fit into eve. The day to day PvP in EvE should never ever take place in arenas.
A tool to help people host tournaments is a different story though.
I would guess it does not even need to be a complicated thing.
Basically all you need is an extra window to create tournaments and to participate in the tournaments. If you could just shedule matches and the participants automatically get transfered into an arena (like in the ally tournament) and get transfered back once the time is over.
A few checkboxes for certain rule options, for example:
- Shiptypes - Max Meta Level - Max Pilots per team - max points per team (each ship getting a certain fixed value for all tournaments) - checkboxes for implant types that are allowed
The system of course would need to be able to automatically scan ship fittings and implants, but i guess that should not really be a big deal.
Basically an automated system that can do what the CCP staff does when they host tournaments.
Its called cyno jamming and bubbles, lots and lots and lots of bubbles. Things are only impossible until they are not. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: [one page] |