Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 .. 40 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Alana Charen-Teng
The Stars Like Dust
297
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 07:17:00 -
[871] - Quote
Breaking news from an undisclosed location in New Eden! My undercover informants have obtained an audio recording of a diplomatic negotiation between our Most Honourable Agents and a Danish miner 'Mine Teck', regarding the latter's purchase of counterfeit mining permits sold by unscrupulous rebels. Have a listen - it's an eye-opening (or should I say, ear-opening) experience. Our Agents are courteous and fair - the New Order does not outsource our customer service to random call centers in India!
Soundcloud recording is here.
Blog post with a little contextual information is here. |

Amyclas Amatin
The Phantom Regiment THE ROYAL NAVY
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 07:39:00 -
[872] - Quote
Perhaps the new order could help miners graduate from high-sec to join low and null-sec corps which can provide them both security and lucrative markets in which to conduct industry. The post that got me banned from Eve-Uni:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=210049&find=unread |

ZZEZ 'Murika
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 09:56:00 -
[873] - Quote
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:Breaking news from an undisclosed location in New Eden! My undercover informants have obtained an audio recording of a diplomatic negotiation between our Most Honourable Agents and a Danish miner 'Mine Teck', regarding the latter's purchase of counterfeit mining permits sold by unscrupulous rebels. Have a listen - it's an eye-opening (or should I say, ear-opening) experience. Our Agents are courteous and fair - the New Order does not outsource our customer service to random call centers in India! Soundcloud recording is here.Blog post with a little contextual information is here.
Who could have done such a thing |

Capt Starfox
New Order Logistics CODE.
392
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 10:24:00 -
[874] - Quote
Isn't the guy above me that's for sure. James 315 for CSM 8 |

Wescro
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
285
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 10:39:00 -
[875] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:Isn't the guy above me that's for sure.
Yea no goon would do that. James 315-á-áis the only pro-sandbox candidate running for CSM 8. Resist the theme-park invasion from dying MMOs like WoW! Keep the only sandbox MMO alive! Vote 315 4 CSM8!!! |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2567
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:17:00 -
[876] - Quote
Wescro wrote:Capt Starfox wrote:Isn't the guy above me that's for sure. Yea no goon would do that.
We value our e-honour. Apparently booking your flight & accomodation to Iceland BEFORE you buy the tickets for the convention which is pretty much the only reason you wanted to go there in the first place is popular. |

Alana Charen-Teng
The Stars Like Dust
299
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:57:00 -
[877] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Perhaps the new order could help miners graduate from high-sec to join low and null-sec corps which can provide them both security and lucrative markets in which to conduct industry. Some learn, and some are still learning. I guess everyone takes their own time. |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 16:14:00 -
[878] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Perhaps the new order could help miners graduate from high-sec to join low and null-sec corps which can provide them both security and lucrative markets in which to conduct industry.
We helped Moonsong Miner make this exact transition! We're always happy to help miners find enlightenment! 315 4 CSM 8 |

Agent Trask
New Order Logistics CODE.
79
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 22:50:00 -
[879] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Amyclas Amatin wrote:Perhaps the new order could help miners graduate from high-sec to join low and null-sec corps which can provide them both security and lucrative markets in which to conduct industry. We helped Moonsong Miner make this exact transition! We're always happy to help miners find enlightenment!
All miners belong in lowsec.
Highsec belongs to me!
( click on the recorded voice link there on that forum only if strapped into a song appreciation chair ) Join the New Order, buy your permit today, and follow the code.
www.minerbumping.com |

Estella Osoka
Deep Void Merc Syndicate Villore Accords
61
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 11:52:00 -
[880] - Quote
Highsec belongs to no one. The moment you start believing something belongs to you in this game, someone will come along and take it from you. Especially ships. People always want to take my ships from me. Even to the point where the thing is falling apart all around me and then I'm in my escape pod! |
|

Lina Drasselbaff
Crunchy Crunchy Peregrine Nation
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 15:45:00 -
[881] - Quote
To all the miners who have been the victim of New Order ganking..
Pay attention and take some damn precautions!
So for a little while over several days I'm going around in a Talwar with 7 festival launchers because I'm curious as to miner reactions in light of the huge ragefits when someone loses a ship. So I go to the ice fields and asteroid belts in turn, then I throw some fireworks at various ships. 90% don't react at all because they're AFK or shy or whatever.
The other 10% warp off. Here's the thing though, the sequence of events of the warpers always goes like this:
* Arrive on scene - no reaction * Lock target - no reaction * Hit approach and make sure to take my time - no reaction * Launch fireworks - HOLY CRAP ALIGN AND WARP PANIC PANIC
Also, the number of ice miners I've seen sitting at warp in point.. ugh.
It's hard to feel sympathy for you when you basically sit there waiting for the gank fleet to arrive. |

Marlon Darmazaf
e-L00T Ltd.
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 16:00:00 -
[882] - Quote
Lina Drasselbaff wrote:To all the miners who have been the victim of New Order ganking..
Pay attention and take some damn precautions!
So for a little while over several days I'm going around in a Talwar with 7 festival launchers because I'm curious as to miner reactions in light of the huge ragefits when someone loses a ship. So I go to the ice fields and asteroid belts in turn, then I throw some fireworks at various ships. 90% don't react at all because they're AFK or shy or whatever.
The other 10% warp off. Here's the thing though, the sequence of events of the warpers always goes like this:
* Arrive on scene - no reaction * Lock target - no reaction * Hit approach and make sure to take my time - no reaction * Launch fireworks - HOLY CRAP ALIGN AND WARP PANIC PANIC
Also, the number of ice miners I've seen sitting at warp in point.. ugh.
It's hard to feel sympathy for you when you basically sit there waiting for the gank fleet to arrive.
My favorite post in this miserable thread.
So... um... yeah! |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:34:00 -
[883] - Quote
Lina Drasselbaff wrote:To all the miners who have been the victim of New Order ganking..
Pay attention and take some damn precautions!
So for a little while over several days I'm going around in a Talwar with 7 festival launchers because I'm curious as to miner reactions in light of the huge ragefits when someone loses a ship. So I go to the ice fields and asteroid belts in turn, then I throw some fireworks at various ships. 90% don't react at all because they're AFK or shy or whatever.
The other 10% warp off. Here's the thing though, the sequence of events of the warpers always goes like this:
* Arrive on scene - no reaction * Lock target - no reaction * Hit approach and make sure to take my time - no reaction * Launch fireworks - HOLY CRAP ALIGN AND WARP PANIC PANIC
Also, the number of ice miners I've seen sitting at warp in point.. ugh.
It's hard to feel sympathy for you when you basically sit there waiting for the gank fleet to arrive.
nice, I bet there are some great laughs to be had doing that.
if you do that to us, we will continue mining and LOL and wave at you in local, ask you how your day is going and generally BS with you until you go on to a different system, or until the convo ends.
o/ Celly Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
115
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 19:39:00 -
[884] - Quote
Here's a question for the NEW ORDER folks...
If i'm running 5 accounts on my PC, and 1 account on my laptop doing a mining op chatting in local, ect ect, then also playing DUST with my son on my console, is that considered AFK mining? or just multi-tasking?
seriously, i know this sounds like I'm trying to troll you guys, but I would like to know how you view that.
o/ Celly Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |

Runeme Shilter
New Order Logistics CODE.
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 20:16:00 -
[885] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote:Here's a question for the NEW ORDER folks...
If i'm running 5 accounts on my PC, and 1 account on my laptop doing a mining op chatting in local, ect ect, then also playing DUST with my son on my console, is that considered AFK mining?
If you are able to respond to chat requests in local within a reasonable timeframe you will have no problem - provided you are in posession of a mining permit for every character.
|

Agent Trask
New Order Logistics CODE.
84
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:18:00 -
[886] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Highsec belongs to no one. The moment you start believing something belongs to you in this game, someone will come along and take it from you. Especially ships. People always want to take my ships from me. Even to the point where the thing is falling apart all around me and then I'm in my escape pod!
We destroy orcas at our pleasure ... so, yes Highsec belongs to me!
http://neworder.mindflood.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16649725
Join the New Order, buy your permit today, and follow the code.
www.minerbumping.com |

Sabriz Adoudel
Resurgent Threat
27
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:30:00 -
[887] - Quote
Leave miners alone!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHmvkRoEowc |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:07:00 -
[888] - Quote
Runeme Shilter wrote:If you are able to respond to chat requests in local within a reasonable timeframe you will have no problem - provided you are in posession of a mining permit for every character.
Not really what I was asking even though I appreciate the response.
the question is does the new order consider running multiple accounts and interacting in game as being AFK or multi-tasking if there's also a side distraction of the console?
and the "provided you are in posession of a mining permit for every character."? well, that's just not going to happen. :P
I've already stated previously what support (and what specific areas of and requirements for that support) the minerbumping community could/would have from me and it does not include me purchasing a permit from anyone, legit representative of the order or Highwayman variant.
o/ Celly
Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |

Agent Trask
New Order Logistics CODE.
88
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:39:00 -
[889] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote:
I've already stated previously what support (and what specific areas of and requirements for that support) the minerbumping community could/would have from me and it does not include me purchasing a permit from anyone, legit representative of the order or Highwayman variant.
o/ Celly
He just answered your question I think. We are considering tagging folks with multiply macro-ed mining barges as bot-aspirants and asploding them. Hell, asploding them might make it easier to sell permits in the systems they are stripping bare.
As for yourself ...
You have a right to log in and mine without a permit.
We have a right to log in and try to asplode you.
Everyone is a winner!
Join the New Order, buy your permit today, and follow the code.
www.minerbumping.com |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 03:11:00 -
[890] - Quote
Agent Trask wrote: He just answered your question I think. We are considering tagging folks with multiply macro-ed mining barges as bot-aspirants and asploding them. Hell, asploding them might make it easier to sell permits in the systems they are stripping bare.
As for yourself ...
You have a right to log in and mine without a permit.
We have a right to log in and try to asplode you.
Everyone is a winner!
hahaha...
No, he didn't and it's a simple yes or no question, wrapping an answer in the veil of the code does not mean it's really being answered. :)
and yes, you have every right to try to esplode (i fixed that for you) me if you want to, if you don't, I'll just add your guns and crap to the huge pile I already have and if you do, then I'll know what it takes to break my tank(s).
and how do you figure they're macro'd?, (for any one out there mining?) I said 5 accounts on one comp, one on a laptop, my comp has multiple monitors and if I am sitting there are the keyboard, talking and moving ore and targeting roids and killing/looting/salvaging rats, how then does that become macro'd? or even AFK or even botting which is what you guys are all about in the first place right?
I mean if you're just going to assume that anyone who has more than one account or anyone that mines is a bot-aspirant, then you're going to be sadly proven wrong time and time again. and yes, I will clear a belt or two or three by myself on a hard core mining day, all the while chatting in vent, in game and sometimes playing dust too. :P
Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |
|

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
61
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 03:42:00 -
[891] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote: and yes, you have every right to try to esplode (i fixed that for you) me if you want to,
"Asplode" was the correct reference to Homestar Runner. 315 4 CSM 8 |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
118
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 04:24:00 -
[892] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Celly Smunt wrote: and yes, you have every right to try to esplode (i fixed that for you) me if you want to,
"Asplode" was the correct reference to Homestar Runner.
fair enough. not familiar with that, but I'll take your word for it :)
i was going more along the lines of "j00 got some esplainin/`splainin to do Lucy!"
and that probably gives away my age too LMAO
oh well.
o/ Celly.
Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |

Emperor Crash Zues
Guns N'Ore AL3XAND3R.
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 09:48:00 -
[893] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote:Agent Trask wrote: He just answered your question I think. We are considering tagging folks with multiply macro-ed mining barges as bot-aspirants and asploding them. Hell, asploding them might make it easier to sell permits in the systems they are stripping bare.
As for yourself ...
You have a right to log in and mine without a permit.
We have a right to log in and try to asplode you.
Everyone is a winner!
hahaha... No, he didn't and it's a simple yes or no question, wrapping an answer in the veil of the code does not mean it's really being answered. :) and yes, you have every right to try to esplode (i fixed that for you) me if you want to, if you don't, I'll just add your guns and crap to the huge pile I already have and if you do, then I'll know what it takes to break my tank(s). and how do you figure they're macro'd?, (for any one out there mining?) I said 5 accounts on one comp, one on a laptop, my comp has multiple monitors and if I am sitting there at the keyboard, talking and moving ore and targeting roids and killing/looting/salvaging rats, how then does that become macro'd? or even AFK or even botting which is what you guys are all about in the first place right? I mean if you're just going to assume that anyone who has more than one account or anyone that mines is a bot-aspirant, then you're going to be sadly proven wrong time and time again. and yes, I will clear a belt or two or three by myself on a hard core mining day, all the while chatting in vent, in game and sometimes playing dust too. :P And they never will answer your question without involving there useless code Otherwise they'd have to admit what they do is extortion. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1030
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 09:53:00 -
[894] - Quote
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: And they never will answer your question without involving there useless code Otherwise they'd have to admit what they do is extortion.
We extort healthy player immersion and interaction from bot-aspirant AFK players who don't seem to understand the core concept of MMO
|

Emperor Crash Zues
Guns N'Ore AL3XAND3R.
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 09:59:00 -
[895] - Quote
Biggest load of crap ever |

Celly Smunt
Viziam Amarr Empire
119
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 11:30:00 -
[896] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Emperor Crash Zues wrote: And they never will answer your question without involving there useless code Otherwise they'd have to admit what they do is extortion. We extort healthy player immersion and interaction from bot-aspirant AFK players who don't seem to understand the core concept of MMO
ok, then based on your own statement, if you know that a person is neither "bot-aspirant" nor "AFK" which is easily discernible by simple watching local, then you leave them alone right? I mean, after all, they are already immersed and not a bot or AFK and are participating in the core basics of an MMO...
right? Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or be singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator. |

Runeme Shilter
New Order Logistics CODE.
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 13:50:00 -
[897] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote: ok, then based on your own statement, if you know that a person is neither "bot-aspirant" nor "AFK" which is easily discernible by simple watching local, then you leave them alone right? I mean, after all, they are already immersed and not a bot or AFK and are participating in the core basics of an MMO...
right?
Why would we leave them alone? If they have no mining permit it doesn't matter if they are afk or not - they will get blown up or bumped. On the other hand: One of the requirements of the mining permit is to not be afk - If you are able to manage 5 eve clients and play console games and are able to respond to chat requests in local, then yes, you are fully within in the code and will be left alone.
|

Manny Moons
New Order Logistics CODE.
13
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 22:52:00 -
[898] - Quote
Celly Smunt wrote:...the question is does the new order consider running multiple accounts and interacting in game as being AFK or multi-tasking if there's also a side distraction of the console?
and the "provided you are in posession of a mining permit for every character."? well, that's just not going to happen. :P... Look, obviously there are a multitude of shades of gray. The Wis mines with a huge multiboxed fleet of 100 ships(https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=200503) and I think most of us will agree he is not botting. Not that his behavior is in any way Code compliant, as far as the New Order is concerned.
But let's say you want to mine in highsec, and you cannot bring yourself to buy a permit. By definition you are not Code compliant. Does that mean you must toss the rest of the Code baby out with the bathwater? I would say no. We advocate being ATK (which we define as paying attention to what's happening around you, and watching local chat). That's good advice for anyone, anywhere in EVE. (Well, maybe not in Jita - it's probably best to ignore local chat there. But then again - you aren't mining in Jita.) We advocate choosing and fitting your ship with an eye toward survivability. Again, good advice for everyone. We constantly try to send the message that there is danger any time you undock, even in highsec. That's good to know, right? And we advise avoiding particularly dangerous situations. If the system where you are mining is populated by players who can be expected to adversely affect your personal play style, perhaps it would be wise to relocate to a different system.
When the New Order has a number of targets to choose from, we will typically choose the most egregious offenders of the Code. The obviously inattentive are high on the list. The woefully undertanked or ridiculously shiny fitted ships are as well (yes, our scouts do scan our targets). And the New Order cannot (yet) be everywhere at once. So as an ATK, attentive, intelligent, but sadly non-permit-holding miner, you can still greatly minimize your risk of interaction with the New Order. Be aware. Be tanky. Be somewhere else. It's not very hard, but it is too hard for a multitude of highsec miners. And those are the miners that make our work so necessary and so satisfying. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Universal Corporate Repossession Inc.
6126
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 01:37:00 -
[899] - Quote
Emperor Crash Zues wrote: And they never will answer your question without involving there useless code Otherwise they'd have to admit what they do is extortion.
There, they're and their, you only have 3 choices, and you still get it wrong.
Extortion is the (illegal) obtaining of money, goods or services via force, or threat of force. I prefer the term coercion myself, it's an integral part of Eve, AWOXers force corporations to give them medals and isk before they will leave corp, pirates ransom other players' ships and pods every day, the New Order temporarily relocates clones unless you've paid for a permit. All are forms of coercion, and all are implicitly allowed by the very nature of the game we play.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Emperor Crash Zues
Guns N'Ore AL3XAND3R.
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 01:55:00 -
[900] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Emperor Crash Zues wrote: And they never will answer your question without involving there useless code Otherwise they'd have to admit what they do is extortion.
There, they're and their, you only have 3 choices, and you still get it wrong. Extortion is the (illegal) obtaining of money, goods or services via force, or threat of force. I prefer the term coercion myself, it's an integral part of Eve, AWOXers force corporations to give them medals and isk before they will leave corp, pirates ransom other players' ships and pods every day, the New Order temporarily relocates clones unless you've paid for a permit. All are forms of coercion, and all are implicitly allowed by the very nature of the game we play. If I wanted your grammar advice I'd ask for it. "Extortion is the (illegal) obtaining of money, goods or services via force, or threat of force." This is exactly what you guys do, regardless what wording you use to justify you corrupt code. Criminal's have have been making excusing for there crime's to justify there actions for years. The Code Alliance is no different. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 .. 40 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |