| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
668
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:Thanks for calling it griefing at least. Now I think you are confusing death penalty with griefing. I say again that you won't hear people say "man remember when EVE online had to be shut down when they removed some ganker alts ability to suicide gank someone." I would add that if suicide ganking in hisec is such a big part of your EVE play then you are doing it wrong.
You're suggesting that I'm playing a sandbox wrong?
|

Merouk Baas
433
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
Two opinions:
1. If one side would rather not have anything to do with a war, instead of forcing them to dock for a week, set up a surrender mechanism where they can pay a sum and get the guarantee that they won't be declared again for a week, with the war ending immediately upon payment. People can evade wars right now, it's just a hassle, but the fact that it's a hassle won't make them fight in the war. So it's a pointless hassle. I'd be pro letting the extortionist get his stuff right away and move on.
2. Have incentives for undocking even if you're clearly going to lose. Not monetary, obviously, but medals for valiant effort, something that can also be used as a coin in the NeX shop, or rent-free office space for the corporation, or NPC standings, accellerated skill training for the combat participants, something. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
391
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Mister S Burke wrote:Thanks for calling it griefing at least. Now I think you are confusing death penalty with griefing. I say again that you won't hear people say "man remember when EVE online had to be shut down when they removed some ganker alts ability to suicide gank someone." I would add that if suicide ganking in hisec is such a big part of your EVE play then you are doing it wrong.
You're suggesting that I'm playing a sandbox wrong?
Yup. You're not playing it his way. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
877
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
Merouk Baas wrote:Two opinions:
1. If one side would rather not have anything to do with a war, instead of forcing them to dock for a week, set up a surrender mechanism where they can pay a sum and get the guarantee that they won't be declared again for a week, with the war ending immediately upon payment. People can evade wars right now, it's just a hassle, but the fact that it's a hassle won't make them fight in the war. So it's a pointless hassle. I'd be pro letting the extortionist get his stuff right away and move on.
2. Have incentives for undocking even if you're clearly going to lose. Not monetary, obviously, but medals for valiant effort, something that can also be used as a coin in the NeX shop, or rent-free office space for the corporation, or NPC standings, accellerated skill training for the combat participants, something.
See, that's all I'd ask of ccp and the csm - trying to come up with ideas like this rather than entertaining the idea of removing non-consensual interactions entirely |

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
12
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:33:00 -
[35] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Sorry, no, I won't call it griefing because it isn't griefing. Is it griefing to snipe a guy in call of duty because he wanted to only use pistols? You only want to mine or mission, but maybe the other guy wants to use all the mechanics, including ones that end up with you getting shot
You don't even understand what griefing is I think. Here is a definition. A griefer derives pleasure primarily or exclusively from the act of annoying other users, and as such is a particular nuisance in online gaming communities, since griefers often cannot be deterred by penalties related to in-game goals. If you want to go suicide gank and AFKer or a miner you just want to be a douche, you're hardly going to rake in the isk, you want to **** someone off. I'm a PVPer, you are wasting my time by depriving me of a target because you are more interested in carebear tears then having a showdown in low or null. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
668
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:35:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:I'm a PVPer, you are wasting my time by depriving me of a target because you are more interested in carebear tears then having a showdown in low or null. Diddums? Tears are what make the economy run.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
878
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Sorry, no, I won't call it griefing because it isn't griefing. Is it griefing to snipe a guy in call of duty because he wanted to only use pistols? You only want to mine or mission, but maybe the other guy wants to use all the mechanics, including ones that end up with you getting shot
You don't even understand what griefing is I think. Here is a definition. A griefer derives pleasure primarily or exclusively from the act of annoying other users, and as such is a particular nuisance in online gaming communities, since griefers often cannot be deterred by penalties related to in-game goals. If you want to go suicide gank and AFKer or a miner you just want to be a douche, you're hardly going to rake in the isk, you want to **** someone off. I'm a PVPer, you are wasting my time by depriving me of a target because you are more interested in carebear tears then having a showdown in low or null.
That's a load of crap. You're basically saying all pvp in highsec is a result of someone wanting to childishly irk someone else. That's a silly statement and you know it. Even if it wasn't though, you haven't provided any reason why doing that shouldn't be mechanically possible, other than saying you don't want it to be. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
392
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:You don't even understand what griefing is I think. Here is a definition.
Your definition doesn't matter within Eve, only CCP's does. What he was talking about is not griefing.
Mister S Burke wrote:I'm a PVPer, you are wasting my time by depriving me of a target because you are more interested in carebear tears then having a showdown in low or null. I'm ALL about some player interection my man, now leave the safetly of hisec you stud and come play with the big kids. You are just as safe in hisec as the carebears as you use the safety of concord to keep you safe until no one can do anything when you strike.
Anything where a player competes with another player fits that description, whether it's you shooting armed ships in lowsec, or a glorious Knight of the New Order racing to destroy a mining ship before that pilot can escape to safety. As for playing with the big kids, plenty of highsec suicide gankers are nullsec residents.
BTW, I realise you're just trying to live up to your name, but Concord don't protect suicide gankers; they shoot them. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
192
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
When CONCORD gets a few days off, either by deliberate plan or some "Tuxfordian Effect"... can't wait for the Youtube parodies.   
And you guys thought that "Big Red Button" we got in the Xmas goodies was just a useless prop....    |

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
15
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:49:00 -
[40] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
That's a load of crap. You're basically saying all pvp in highsec is a result of someone wanting to childishly irk someone else. That's a silly statement and you know it. Even if it wasn't though, you haven't provided any reason why doing that shouldn't be mechanically possible, other than saying you don't want it to be.
I think things are out of whack. PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked, you want to go gank them. I want to PVP people like you but you want to hide in hisec hypocritically under the same Concord protection that the PVE people enjoy that you bemoan. I know what you are doing in a hisec belt in your Thrasher but I can't jack you because you are just as safe as the carebears until you decide at your safe leisure to LOLOVERHEATPEWPEWW. PVP is like spinach, if you are forced to have it when you are young you don't want it when you grow up. Let the PVE people skill up, mine, make isk in peace in hisec and then let them get rich and bored and come to low null and play. You griefers cause your own problem, you turn noobs off to PVP from the start and they just never want to get into PVP. |

Riedle
Paradox Collective Choke Point
254
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:55:00 -
[41] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:
That's a load of crap. You're basically saying all pvp in highsec is a result of someone wanting to childishly irk someone else. That's a silly statement and you know it. Even if it wasn't though, you haven't provided any reason why doing that shouldn't be mechanically possible, other than saying you don't want it to be.
I think things are out of whack. PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked, you want to go gank them. I want to PVP people like you but you want to hide in hisec hypocritically under the same Concord protection that the PVE people enjoy that you bemoan. I know what you are doing in a hisec belt in your Thrasher but I can't jack you because you are just as safe as the carebears until you decide at your safe leisure to LOLOVERHEATPEWPEWW. PVP is like spinach, if you are forced to have it when you are young you don't want it when you grow up. Let the PVE people skill up, mine, make isk in peace in hisec and then let them get rich and bored and come to low null and play. You griefers cause your own problem, you turn noobs off to PVP from the start and they just never want to get into PVP.
the ****? There are a TON of carebears in null. You should know this if you are there as you infer that you are. YOu don't get to define what PVP is. You also don't get to define what griefing is. If you don't like 'griefing' then ask the PVE'ers to put bounties on the 'griefers' who are 'griefing' them and YOU go hunt them down and exact revenge.
Riedle |

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
16
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
admiral root wrote:[quote=Mister S Burke]
BTW, I realise you're just trying to live up to your name, but Concord don't protect suicide gankers; they shoot them.
Sure they do, no one mentions this hypocrisy. That suicide ganker is safe as can be until it's too late. I know what those Thrashers are doing, can't touch them because Concord keeps them safe too until they want to suicide when it pleases them.
|

Lin Suizei
67
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:56:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:I know what you are doing in a hisec belt in your Thrasher but I can't jack you because you are just as safe as the carebears until you decide at your safe leisure to LOLOVERHEATPEWPEWW.
Hi have you actually seen a suicide ganker before? Do your part for a better Highsec tomorrow - kill an AFK miner today! |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
672
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 13:58:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote: Sure they do, no one mentions this hypocrisy. That suicide ganker is safe as can be until it's too late. I know what those Thrashers are doing, can't touch them because Concord keeps them safe too until they want to suicide when it pleases them.
Maybe you've heard of security status?
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
392
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked, you want to go gank them.
And if they want to do so in perfect safety there are other games out there. If they want to *attempt* to PvE without being ganked then that's fine.
Mister S Burke wrote:I want to PVP people like you but you want to hide in hisec hypocritically under the same Concord protection that the PVE people enjoy that you bemoan.
There are plenty of suicide gankers who operate at -10, so no, they don't get Concord protection at all.
Mister S Burke wrote: PVP is like spinach, if you are forced to have it when you are young you don't want it when you grow up. Let the PVE people skill up, mine, make isk in peace in hisec and then let them get rich and bored and come to low null and play.
That's a lovely theory, but people like Test and Goons have proven that you don't have to do all that to be able to PvP. Also, do we have any metrics to show those people ever migrate to low / null in any significant numbers, or are you just making things up? I did exactly that, but that's hardly a statistically significant sample. 
Mister S Burke wrote:You griefers cause your own problem, you turn noobs off to PVP from the start and they just never want to get into PVP.
I'm guessing you mean newbies, not noobs, as they're two different things. Being ganked and podded should be part of the newbie tutorial - the quicker people realise the true nature of the game the sooner they can see if it's the game for them. It would also help prevent the culture of entitlement from whiners who, having been left alone in the past, feel that it's somehow terribly wrong that then have anyone interfere in their ability to make piles of isk. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
16
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:03:00 -
[46] - Quote
Riedle wrote:[quote=Mister S Burke] You also don't get to define what griefing is.
Riedle
I sure do and I just did. I've been playing games since the 80's so I know my way around gamers and the game culture. Griefing has and always will be taking advantage of someone who can't fight back. EVE has hardly reinvented the wheel here.
|

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
16
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:05:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Mister S Burke wrote: Sure they do, no one mentions this hypocrisy. That suicide ganker is safe as can be until it's too late. I know what those Thrashers are doing, can't touch them because Concord keeps them safe too until they want to suicide when it pleases them.
Maybe you've heard of security status?
Maybe you're heard of alts?
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
393
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:Riedle wrote:[quote=Mister S Burke] You also don't get to define what griefing is.
Riedle I sure do and I just did. I've been playing games since the 80's so I know my way around gamers and the game culture. Griefing has and always will be taking advantage of someone who can't fight back. EVE has hardly reinvented the wheel here.
You and me both - I remember pong, space invaders and asteroids. Griefing is still defined by CCP in Eve's case, not by you, because they're the ones who ban people for it. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
393
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:07:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Mister S Burke wrote: Sure they do, no one mentions this hypocrisy. That suicide ganker is safe as can be until it's too late. I know what those Thrashers are doing, can't touch them because Concord keeps them safe too until they want to suicide when it pleases them.
Maybe you've heard of security status? Maybe you're heard of alts?
Maybe you've heard of people who use dedicated suicide gank alts and, in full compliance with the EULA, don't recycle them. They keep on blowing ships up while -10. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Doctor Ungabungas
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
233
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:07:00 -
[50] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:admiral root wrote:[quote=Mister S Burke]
BTW, I realise you're just trying to live up to your name, but Concord don't protect suicide gankers; they shoot them. Sure they do, no one mentions this hypocrisy. That suicide ganker is safe as can be until it's too late. I know what those Thrashers are doing, can't touch them because Concord keeps them safe too until they want to suicide when it pleases them.
You could always get in a thrasher and gank them.
Just to summarise, I think ganking is fine (well, the counter to ganking is ganking really) but wardecs are basically a waste of time. It almost always just turns out to be 'game denial' because people won't undock while there's a wardec active.
I think the game would be better if people actually got in their spaceships and shot their guns at each other, but wardecs aren't going to trigger that behavior on their own. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1100
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:09:00 -
[51] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Mister S Burke wrote:Thanks for calling it griefing at least. Now I think you are confusing death penalty with griefing. I say again that you won't hear people say "man remember when EVE online had to be shut down when they removed some ganker alts ability to suicide gank someone." I would add that if suicide ganking in hisec is such a big part of your EVE play then you are doing it wrong.
You're suggesting that I'm playing a sandbox wrong?
You and your kind suggest everyone else is playing the sandbox wrong everyday. 
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Maybe you've heard of security status?
That you easily avoid.
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
393
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:09:00 -
[52] - Quote
Doctor Ungabungas wrote:You could always get in a thrasher and gank them.
Time, effort, isk/hr, sinking to our level, etc.  No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

baltec1
Bat Country
4765
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote: I think things are out of whack. PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked, you want to go gank them. I want to PVP people like you but you want to hide in hisec hypocritically under the same Concord protection that the PVE people enjoy that you bemoan. I know what you are doing in a hisec belt in your Thrasher but I can't jack you because you are just as safe as the carebears until you decide at your safe leisure to LOLOVERHEATPEWPEWW. PVP is like spinach, if you are forced to have it when you are young you don't want it when you grow up. Let the PVE people skill up, mine, make isk in peace in hisec and then let them get rich and bored and come to low null and play. You griefers cause your own problem, you turn noobs off to PVP from the start and they just never want to get into PVP.
War dec him, gank him, bimp him, tank your ships ect ect.
Its still not griefing its us using game mechanics made available to us. Its also not nubs that get targeted by the likes of us. |

bongsmoke
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
86
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:11:00 -
[54] - Quote
Your still able to gank people, don't see the source of tears being valid beyond this point. |

Doctor Ungabungas
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
233
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:11:00 -
[55] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Doctor Ungabungas wrote:You could always get in a thrasher and gank them. Time, effort, isk/hr, sinking to our level, etc. 
Maybe they're worried they might enjoy it.
:ohdear: |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
393
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:11:00 -
[56] - Quote
Anslo wrote:You and your kind suggest everyone else is playing the sandbox wrong everyday. 
No, the New Order makes it clear to highsec miners that theirs is not the only way, and that if they elect to continue playing the same way we will confiscate their ships and pods. The key here is that the miner makes the choice to continue playing the same way despite the obvious risk.
Now, go back under your bridge. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Mister S Burke
Earths Naval Space Command The Mandalorians
18
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:12:00 -
[57] - Quote
admiral root wrote:
And if they want to do so in perfect safety there are other games out there. If they want to *attempt* to PvE without being ganked then that's fine.
You are missing the big picture, this is a business and they want people to play here. I think it's too reactionary to say that if griefing pvp is taken out of hisec then EVE becomes insta Runescape or a themepark MMO, that is silly. All I am saying to be clear is that we can keep our cake and eat it too. Let the PVE people play in peace, they will get rich, they will get bored and they will realize they can't take the isk with them if they unsub so they go to null and lowsec. How is this fair? Well they don't get PVP experience by taking the safe road to riches do they? So if you went the hard way to low and null you have an advantage because you rose the hard way, won't be as rich but everyone wins in the end.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
878
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:12:00 -
[58] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:
That's a load of crap. You're basically saying all pvp in highsec is a result of someone wanting to childishly irk someone else. That's a silly statement and you know it. Even if it wasn't though, you haven't provided any reason why doing that shouldn't be mechanically possible, other than saying you don't want it to be.
I think things are out of whack. PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked, you want to go gank them. I want to PVP people like you but you want to hide in hisec hypocritically under the same Concord protection that the PVE people enjoy that you bemoan. I know what you are doing in a hisec belt in your Thrasher but I can't jack you because you are just as safe as the carebears until you decide at your safe leisure to LOLOVERHEATPEWPEWW. PVP is like spinach, if you are forced to have it when you are young you don't want it when you grow up. Let the PVE people skill up, mine, make isk in peace in hisec and then let them get rich and bored and come to low null and play. You griefers cause your own problem, you turn noobs off to PVP from the start and they just never want to get into PVP.
For a start, I've only been in hisec for the last month or so. For over a year before that I lived exclusively in wormhole space. Stop trying to create a strawman.
Secondly, I'm no more protected by concord than anyone else is in highsec. If you want to kill me you have the exact same capability to do that as I do to kill some miner: War decs, suicide ganks.
Also, while you say that "PVE people want to PVE and not be ganked"... sorry, it doesn't matter if that's what they want. I want my own personal fleet of titans. I want concord to not exist. I want x, y and z. It doesn't matter, we all have to face how the game currently works - for them that includes being open to war decs and suicide ganks. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
1100
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:14:00 -
[59] - Quote
admiral root wrote:[quote=Anslo]No, the New Order makes it clear to highsec miners that theres is not the only way, and that if they elect to continue playing the same way we will confiscate their ships and pods. Translation: Play our way or we prevent you from playing your way.
Quote:Now, go back under your bridge. Ladies first 
|

baltec1
Bat Country
4765
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 14:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
Mister S Burke wrote:admiral root wrote:
And if they want to do so in perfect safety there are other games out there. If they want to *attempt* to PvE without being ganked then that's fine.
You are missing the big picture, this is a business and they want people to play here. I think it's too reactionary to say that if griefing pvp is taken out of hisec then EVE becomes insta Runescape or a themepark MMO, that is silly. All I am saying to be clear is that we can keep our cake and eat it too. Let the PVE people play in peace, they will get rich, they will get bored and they will realize they can't take the isk with them if they unsub so they go to null and lowsec. How is this fair? Well they don't get PVP experience by taking the safe road to riches do they? So if you went the hard way to low and null you have an advantage because you rose the hard way, won't be as rich but everyone wins in the end.
Considering we have had these things happening in game for TEN YEARS and we have had nothing but year on year growth I would say the sytem is working just fine. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |