| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Flash Landsraad
   |
Posted - 2005.07.09 08:39:00 -
[1]
Sign here if you think the restriction on ship setups with offlined modules was unneccessary.
CCP should fix the problem with the modules themselves rather than introducing a quick fix that iritates the hell out of everyone. Quick fixes are lazy fixes, and more often than not they don't work effectively.
Who cares if someone travels around in a rifter with 1400mms on it? Or an Enyo with 425s? People can't turn them online and it doesn't harm anyone. (It also looks rather amusing for casual passerbys... )
The fact is that because of this hundreds of effective and valid tactical setups have been nerfed because of some offline modules giving bonuses when not online. Surely it would be better to fix these modules rather than introducing code which nerfs and entire category of ship setup?
Sign here if you agree, and those that don't agree please do not come on here trolling and spamming - either sign or don't. This is purely to show how many people agree.
If that number is not high I wont mention this ever again.
Please note - I do not represent my corp with this topic - my corp has nothing to do with this.
Thanks for reading.
________________________________________________
Stop Whining!!!
Level  English Gentleman |
Elaine Threepwood
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 08:43:00 -
[2]
Signed, even though I almost never did this anyway.
|
Ante
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 08:44:00 -
[3]
Definitely! Signed.
|
s1mon4
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 09:09:00 -
[4]
Signed
|
Liu Bei
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 09:16:00 -
[5]
Pointless change to the previous system. SIGNED!
Work is the curse of the drinking class - Oscar Wilde |
Meridius
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 09:18:00 -
[6]
Stop taking interesting setups out of the game.
Signed
________________________________________________________
|
M'tel Ankari
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 09:38:00 -
[7]
Signed
Unnecessary module restrictions -> more cookie cutter setups -> less fun
|
Chris Henry
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 10:02:00 -
[8]
Signed
---------------
A Puppet Master
|
ELECTR0FREAK
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 10:11:00 -
[9]
Signed, hits my Buzzard setup pretty hard.
|
babylonstew
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 10:29:00 -
[10]
ill sign this to.
even tho there is a way around this restriction but not sure if its an exploit tho
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
R31D
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 10:32:00 -
[11]
Signed. big guns used to look so cool on interceptors
|
Gareth Angel
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 10:51:00 -
[12]
Signed.
"Why, oh why, didn't I take the BLUE pill???" |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:00:00 -
[13]
Signed.
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
-- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
Crux Australis
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:04:00 -
[14]
Signed
|
madaluap
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:14:00 -
[15]
signed for moving big cargo taking modules its perfect...
|
DogTyred
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:20:00 -
[16]
signed
|
Ak'athra J'ador
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:26:00 -
[17]
yea, i mean what is the point of being able to offline/online mods outside the station now?
signed
|
Tiki Rar
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:34:00 -
[18]
Signed.
I miss flying my
Crusader of doom : Crusader of doom
and
Retribution of doom :Retribution of doom
-----------
]http://www.insane-mapping.tk[ |
HeLlRaIzA666
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:37:00 -
[19]
signed
--------------------------------------------
In War There Are No Runners Up...
Image by Denrace |
CptEagle
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 11:53:00 -
[20]
Signed... anoying if you use shield tanked ship and you take armor dmg then you put 1 laucher for instance offline and you take 1 PDU off and put a armor repper inthere and then you cant undock :/ More time sinks in the end...
|
Soggy Gravy
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 12:07:00 -
[21]
SIGNED! Agreed 110% this limits a ton of effective strategical setups.
|
Harlequin D'Earth
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 13:07:00 -
[22]
Signed.
Fix the cause of the problem (i.e. the unintentional passive boosts gained from off-line mods), rather than using proverbial sledgehammer on nut.
|
Uggster
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 13:17:00 -
[23]
Signed
One of the most heavy-handed "fix" I have ever seen
|
Suze'Rain
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 13:24:00 -
[24]
Signed.
A completely inexcusable "quick-fix" that has seriously damaged the gameplay's tactical opportunities.
|
Icarius
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 13:52:00 -
[25]
Signed
|
Kerby Lane
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 13:59:00 -
[26]
signed..
|
Maestro Feyd
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:02:00 -
[27]
Signed
|
Kaeten
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:03:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Kaeten on 09/07/2005 14:05:21
hmm, it does look abit stupid though enyos running around with 425's? It's not the grid or cpu but its about the SPACE of the turrut slot. However since I don't do this I can't really say anything on the subject.
|
Darth Mouse
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:12:00 -
[29]
Signed
|
KOJIKI
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:23:00 -
[30]
SIGNED!!!! 
|
Tragar
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:23:00 -
[31]
SIGNED my cov ops now = tottally useless
|
Jarael
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:36:00 -
[32]
The old adage of using a misshapen sledgehammer to ***** a nut comes to mind.
Signed.
|
RougeTrader
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:41:00 -
[33]
Signed.
|
Caldorous
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:49:00 -
[34]
signed
-----------------------------
2005.03.13 01:11:29combatYour 350mm Railgun I perfectly strikes Asteroid (Veldspar), wrecking for 0.0 damage.
|
Grey Area
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 14:53:00 -
[35]
Don't even need to read it. Signed.
This is the same "fix" route as CCP took with NPC haulers...problem with the cargo they were carrying occasionally being Tech II, so instead of fixing the list, they just emptied them all, wiping out a whole profession overnight...
Do your job properly CCP. No more spit and chewing gum fixes please.
=========================================
* I'm ALLOWED to cheat. I'm a STARSHIP. *
========================================= |
Alaric Goth
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 15:20:00 -
[36]
Signed
Ive never done this personally, but it seems like it eliminates a variety of strategic options.
I think the old adage of measure twice, cut once should be applied to any changes to the core rules of the game.
|
Carlos Mazzutti
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:11:00 -
[37]
Signed. An ill-considered and heavy handed 'fix'. |
Altrimenti Detto
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:13:00 -
[38]
Signed
|
Iasus
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:15:00 -
[39]
signed
I'm generally a nice, considerate guy, unless you **** me off, in which case you will be killed without warning or mercy. 'Nuff said.
|
wilson 2shoes
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:21:00 -
[40]
signed
|
Romulus Maximus
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:44:00 -
[41]
Signed
|
Vishnej
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 16:47:00 -
[42]
Signed.
|
Roland De'chain
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 17:11:00 -
[43]
Signed!
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 17:16:00 -
[44]
signed
|
Blood Ghost
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 17:33:00 -
[45]
Edited by: Blood Ghost on 09/07/2005 17:35:02
signed
This was really the only thing I did'nt like in the patch, I agreeded with the missels changes unlike a few people but this is just sooo anoying.
|
Sadist
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 21:05:00 -
[46]
Signed. T'was a useless change that's only been done to annoy players.
---------------
 Originally by: Dark Shikari
"One Trit to rule them all, One Trit to find them, One Trit to bring them all, and in the veldspar bind them"
|
Thor Darkwing
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 21:42:00 -
[47]
/Signed
|
Spuki
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 22:22:00 -
[48]
signed!
|
Luc Boye
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 22:44:00 -
[49]
signed. they are OFFLINE not UNFITTED.
|
Maximiliian Kell
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 23:02:00 -
[50]
signed. only cause i turn off turrets while i fit a mwd for traveling.
|
Tar om
|
Posted - 2005.07.09 23:52:00 -
[51]
signed
especially for the armour rep fitting thing. Used to slap a 1400 offline, now you have to unfit, refit, reload etc. Just more pointless clicks.
--
We are the Octavian Vanguard www.octavianvanguard.net
http://www.serenitymovie.com |
jbob2000
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 03:15:00 -
[52]
I agree. As far as i know, it was only a few mondules that had this bug, so why kill some nice setups just so like 2 modules will work properly.
-----------------------------------------------
CANADIAN |
Deep Throat
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 03:41:00 -
[53]
Signed with capital S
|
xaja
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 03:47:00 -
[54]
SIGNED !!!
My agent needlessly sends me to jump all over the place for missions, so I put one gun offline so I can install an MWD to fly to the system. Now I have to uninstall it and use up the space in cargo which I need for ammo.
Aside from the fact that all the extra configuring is annoying.
SOOOOOOOOOO TIRED OF CCP'S CONSTANT CHINZY QUICK FIXES
|
Black January
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 04:41:00 -
[55]
signed
|
keepiru
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 04:43:00 -
[56]
/signed
half-assed quickfixes ftl. 
-------------
|
Newport Menthol
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 05:52:00 -
[57]
signed
|
Linavin
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 05:59:00 -
[58]
signed
|
Danmar Kash
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 06:02:00 -
[59]
signed. taking modules offline to online that remote armor repairer in space to repair your buddy was useful.
|
Lago Morph
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 06:12:00 -
[60]
Signed.
|
lollerskates
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 09:44:00 -
[61]
signed. This problem is keeping my ship from undocking while i wait for the adv weapon upgrades skill to be fixed.
|
Weirda
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 09:59:00 -
[62]
*signed*
this 'fix' was a not well thought out kludge to keep ppl from flying around in crusader with megapulse on it... 
it really kicked covert ops in the balls though!
--
Thread Killer
<END TRANSMISSIO |
Espen
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 10:09:00 -
[63]
signed
Made by Palitir |
Iynara Maeral
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:04:00 -
[64]
Signed
______________
|
Stephen HB
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:06:00 -
[65]
Never used the offline/online thing myself but my sympathies to those kicked in the b***s by CCP on this one.
Oh, and signed.
|
rig0r
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:16:00 -
[66]
Signed.
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:19:00 -
[67]
Signed.
|
Frell
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:20:00 -
[68]
signed
|
Dan Spitty
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:40:00 -
[69]
Signed. Seems so pointless when there's other things to "fix" first.
|
Vathar
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 11:48:00 -
[70]
Signed
'twas nice to have an offline armor rep for 0.0 hunting when the nearest station is a dozen jumps away ...
____________
Space Shaman
Don't take life seriously, you'll not survive it anyway
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) yay, got my bunny too !! |
TheDrinker
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 12:17:00 -
[71]
Signed. |
Squall heart
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 12:25:00 -
[72]
signed, annoyed the hell out of me when i first found this out
|
Terissa
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 14:06:00 -
[73]
Agree and SIGNED
I also put the afterburner offline and the turrets online when speed is not need for the mission. Same for hull/armor repair now becomes almost usless.. If I have to dock, one click and the base takes my isk for repairs.. I like my isk.
|
Sharlot Thomas
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 14:39:00 -
[74]
Power Management has always been a roll for Pilots and Captains of their craft. Look at the Apollo Program, Huston We Have A Problem. To bring the computer back on line they had to switch things on in space and in the correct order.
You can't get much closer to the true feel of being the Master and Commander of your ship then this. Even JFK bolted a large caliber gun to the deck of his PT boat.
We want this fixed now not SOON(tm).
|
Timothy Tragain
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 14:52:00 -
[75]
You tell them sister.
what she said!
Signed: Timothy N. Tragain
|
shooting dutchman
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 16:41:00 -
[76]
signed.
|
Kyle Chimko
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:04:00 -
[77]
signed
|
Hesprax
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:14:00 -
[78]
Edited by: Hesprax on 10/07/2005 17:16:36
Signed.
I do sometimes put large guns onto small ships simply to move them quickly, as they take up a lot of space I might bolt large guns to a ceptor to save space in the hold for something else, it's one way I use of getting stuff in and out of 0.0, I am sure others do this to.
|
Tanix
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:36:00 -
[79]
Signage
|
Tirfing
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:35:00 -
[80]
Signed
|
Fred0
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 19:11:00 -
[81]
signed
|
Alberta
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 19:56:00 -
[82]
My guess is that it was done to stop people moving capital ship mods on ceptors. If that's the case then I can see their point (moving 4000m3 of guns on a Crusader is just wrong), but there are much better ways of fixing it. Take the time to do it right please.
Signed.
My Thoughts on Game Balance |
Py Roden
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:08:00 -
[83]
Signed
|
Paul123
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:09:00 -
[84]
Signed
|
Danardo
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:20:00 -
[85]
Signed.
|
Lisha Argus
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:28:00 -
[86]
Signed 110%
|
Vishnej
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:34:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Alberta
My guess is that it was done to stop people moving capital ship mods on ceptors. If that's the case then I can see their point (moving 4000m3 of guns on a Crusader is just wrong), but there are much better ways of fixing it. Take the time to do it right please.
Signed.
I'd be satisfied from a RP perspective with frigs being able to mount dormant capital ship guns, as long as their mass negatively affected the ship's agility by a large amount.
The thing is, I still havn't seen CCP say that this change was made for aesthetic purposes, the only mention I've seen of a reason was that "It was the only way to prevent people from mounting oversized gear," or somesuch - which should be a valid tactical decision, for all that the 100MN AB on a cruiser was overpowered pre-Shiva.
|
Jasper Von'Horn
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:37:00 -
[88]
Signed: X
Deep Core Mining / Rank 6 / SP: 271532 of 1536000
ĀCurrently training to: level 5
ĀTime left: 40 days, 9 hours, 9 minutes
Where's my beer
(GLUG GLUG GLUG) |
Razner Cerizo
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:39:00 -
[89]
/signed
|
Kelhund
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 21:17:00 -
[90]
/signed
|
Karsten
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 21:33:00 -
[91]
agree
Karsten
"All your ISK belong to the Viking Brewery" |
Shan'Talasha Mea'Questa
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 23:23:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Alberta
My guess is that it was done to stop people moving capital ship mods on ceptors. If that's the case then I can see their point (moving 4000m3 of guns on a Crusader is just wrong), but there are much better ways of fixing it. Take the time to do it right please.
Signed.
This is the point I agree with...
A module should be able to be switched on to be allowed to fit at all. A X-Large shield booster has no place on a frigate, besides being in it's hold.
|
Doc Brown
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 05:19:00 -
[93]
I didn't read this whole thread 'cause I saw alot of pointless posts of "signed"...
However here's my thoughts (also posted in the game dev forum)
Since the latest patch, modules off-line still count as using power, thus preventing one from undocking if you are over on power.
This is presently happening to me and my Helios.
I have equiped a Covert-Op II cloak, Scan-Probe Launcher (off-line), an AB, two Cap Recharger I's, one CPU booster and one Small Cap Battery.
Since my scan-probe launcher is offline, I'm at exactly 25 power. I can't undock because the station is adding the 3 power for the scan probe launcher.
Normally I would switch the cloak and probe launcher off-line and on-line in space depending on which I needed.
I would like to know why this is no-longer alowed.
Why give the ability to activate/de-activate modules in space then?
I'm not flying around with a 1400 on a rifter, I'm chosing between search (scan probe) and saftey (cloak).
_________________________________________________
There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations. |
Gamer4liff
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 05:34:00 -
[94]
sine-d
|
Kuolematon
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 06:01:00 -
[95]
Signed, diversity 4tw! 
_______________________________________________
My opinions aren't my corporations opinions.
"I troll, therefor I am!" //\\ Suomi-Finland-Perkele asennetta! |
The Hand
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 06:16:00 -
[96]
Signed, Ccp have f***ed up big time with this patch, please restore our faith in you stop wrecking eve.
|
franny
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 06:21:00 -
[97]
/emote squiggles name
signed |
Hellspawn666
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 06:36:00 -
[98]
signed i assumed this was somthing they were already ont eh way to fixing makes no sense to not allow it, its not a valid tactic ot turn on a module during battle becasue of the 75% cap outage so its fairly balanced that way.
Although i think ull find that u never used to be able to fit a module on the ship if its never able to be onlined i.e 1400 on a rifter never worked because there is not enough pg to fit it
|
ortaga
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 07:54:00 -
[99]
signed. another crap part of a crap patch.
|
poisoner orbius
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 08:05:00 -
[100]
Signed
|
Boonaki
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 08:32:00 -
[101]
Signed.
I used to offline 1 proble launcher on the Buzzard, can't do that anymore, don't see why they did this instead of just fixing the issues.
Fear the Ibis of doom. |
Jadran
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 08:46:00 -
[102]
signed.
Don't make me get my flying monkies. |
Paul123
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 09:00:00 -
[103]
Signed
|
Dri Kulsane
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 09:10:00 -
[104]
signed
|
DukeJoost1
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 09:20:00 -
[105]
Signed.
|
Zoriander
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 09:29:00 -
[106]
Signed
|
Iome
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 09:30:00 -
[107]
Signed
|
Krisse
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 10:02:00 -
[108]
Signed.
--
|
Phoenix Risn
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 10:11:00 -
[109]
Definately Signed.
|
Monty Burns
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 10:18:00 -
[110]
Signed
fix bugs, dont feck the rest of us over with quick work-arounds.
Darwin 4tw
|
Helpdesk
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 10:23:00 -
[111]
Signed
Offline scanner was the main reason to get a buzzard here.
|
Kinsy
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 10:44:00 -
[112]
Signed.
|
Scribal
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:09:00 -
[113]
Signed |
Physicist
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:13:00 -
[114]
Signed.
I only just noticed this issue when trying to offline some weapons for the CPU and PG to fit a temporary Large Hull Repairer. I was shocked at the absurdity!
|
Aimon
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:15:00 -
[115]
signed
|
Deja Thoris
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:31:00 -
[116]
Signed
|
CriticalJim
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:33:00 -
[117]
signed
http://www.css-corp.co.uk |
Phoenix 888
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 11:45:00 -
[118]
SIGNED !!
Oh p.s i logged in specially to sign this stupid change !
|
Gaius Rex
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 12:00:00 -
[119]
Signed.
|
Tayira
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 12:34:00 -
[120]
signed ... better fix bugs, pse !!
|
Greyshadow
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 12:37:00 -
[121]
Signed
"Everybody is a winner baby thats the truth, well apart from the losers who lose obviously" |
Justice Bringer
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 13:30:00 -
[122]
Signed
|
Xavier Zyrae
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 14:21:00 -
[123]
Signed
|
Cdr Foxbat
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 14:25:00 -
[124]
Signed
However IMO - just don't allow ships to undock if one of the modules takes up more than the entire powergrid or cpu - that should stop the 1400 rifters...........
|
Mairon
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 14:32:00 -
[125]
Signed.
Mairon
|
ClawHammer III
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 20:51:00 -
[126]
Signed
|
Hale Haleson
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 20:56:00 -
[127]
Signed.
(Please get rid of cap usage when onlining modules at a ship maintenance array while you are at it)
|
Firan Solatir
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 21:20:00 -
[128]
Signed, this totaly fu*$#d up the setup of my frigate (took one gun offline and put another online depending on range of rats)
|
Siroc
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 21:24:00 -
[129]
/signed
limitations = no fun. specialy dumb ones like that. fix the exploits with offlined modules but there is no reason to disable this completely. Are you saying that you just waisted whole bunch of time developing this off/on functionality system into the game to disable it later? There is realy no other reason to keep offlined modules on the ship any more.
aka (Ohotnik) |
Tul 'Kas
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 21:57:00 -
[130]
Signed
Originally by: Cdr Foxbat
just don't allow ships to undock if one of the modules takes up more than the entire powergrid or cpu
IMO this would accomplish CCP's objectives just as well as the currently implemented slop-tastic kludge without axing so many valid setups.
|
Aleis
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 22:01:00 -
[131]
Sort of signed
I don't mind the fact that you can't fit a an item that you could never online in the first place, Like a 1400mm on a rifter but with the new patch you can't fit any item that you don't have the CPU/Grid to online. What the point of having the online/offline thing anyway then.
|
Coronach
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 22:07:00 -
[132]
Signed.
|
without
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 02:09:00 -
[133]
signed
|
Dao 2
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 02:32:00 -
[134]
signed! ;p
yeah the array with cap thing sucks too
|
Blind Man
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 02:56:00 -
[135]
signed, catalyst with 8x 1400's offline 4tw
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Bbllaarrgg
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 03:11:00 -
[136]
Signed.
Ok so there were problems - i took advantage of the offlime bcu's trick, guessed it must work with some other stuff.
But fix the problem, dont destroy the flexibility of the game...
_________________________
Insert fnord here. |
Hehulk
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 05:19:00 -
[137]
/signed. This was pointless and unnessacary.
----------
Questioning your very existence 1 stage at a time. |
Kaygo
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 06:22:00 -
[138]
Signed.
|
Ralitge boyter
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 06:52:00 -
[139]
Signed
|
Wear
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 10:18:00 -
[140]
Signed
>>input sig here<< |
POSITRON
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 10:39:00 -
[141]
Signed
|
Doktor Soet
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 10:42:00 -
[142]
Signed
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 10:43:00 -
[143]
signed again, as I just got into my cheetah and cried.
|
Tu Ve
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:11:00 -
[144]
Signed
|
Catori Fala
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:12:00 -
[145]
Signed |
Amarr Emperor
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:15:00 -
[146]
Signed (Not even the Emperor has infinite powergride/cpu)
|
Dred 'Morte
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:15:00 -
[147]
signed
|
Feta Solamnia
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:25:00 -
[148]
gimmeh back my cheetah setp!
/signed
Originally by: Oveur
I have access to all market data. Believe me, we have not reached anything close to deflation yet.
|
Dimitri Forgroth
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:28:00 -
[149]
signed
| Don't be a bad loser | |
Cloned Mark
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:44:00 -
[150]
Signed
-----------------------------
M. Corp |
Camel S
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:46:00 -
[151]
Signed
Before this fix alot of ppl had a remote armor rep offline on the last hi-slot. Now it's back to dock, put on rep, dock out and repair, dock back in, fix setup and finally dock out!
|
stuart waterman
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 11:58:00 -
[152]
Well it tottally ****ed up my Covert ops ship.
I had a real sweet set up on it but it meant that I could only have the probe launcher or cloacking device on 1 at a time becuase of CPU restrictions.
Now I have a co-vert ops ship with lots of empty slots as I have more import things to trian than covert ops level 5
Stu
|
Askari
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 13:02:00 -
[153]
/Signed!
I frequently used to fly with a de-activated smart bomb for drone missions
----------------
~= Askari =~
Urza's Factory
http://www.mikeward.uk.com/urzas
|
Pagefault
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 13:10:00 -
[154]
signed
|
Kaeten
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 13:34:00 -
[155]
Right I've noticed the problem and it should not be liek that.
Signed
|
Krle
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 13:34:00 -
[156]
signed
|
Mark Starkiller
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 13:53:00 -
[157]
signed and signed
|
Knier
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 14:31:00 -
[158]
/signed
|
Maria Lynn
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 15:23:00 -
[159]
Signed: Maria Lynn
Off Line Smartbombs are a safty issue.
One extra click and Concord comes knocking.
|
Mabelrode
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 15:33:00 -
[160]
Signed. Fix it and stop wasting time coding some *** font change in the next patch.
|
DrunkenOne
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 15:35:00 -
[161]
signed
jagerbomb part 2 now out |
Fenix Rebirth
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 15:42:00 -
[162]
signed
I dont suffer from Insanity *I ENJOY EVERY FECKIN MINUTE OF IT* |
ThiefKiller2
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 15:51:00 -
[163]
Signed
|
Aradous
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 16:03:00 -
[164]
signed
|
Justice Starcatcher
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 16:26:00 -
[165]
Signed
What the... |
Amazoph
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 16:51:00 -
[166]
signed
|
Sir Kad
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 17:27:00 -
[167]
signed...
|
Lanu
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 17:32:00 -
[168]
Did I sign already? if not Signed!
boo
"You are most like the Cat, lazy and quiet. You aren't very exciting yet everyone notices your presence."
|
Captain Phoenix
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 19:29:00 -
[169]
signed
|
Tyr LightSpar
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 19:56:00 -
[170]
Signed. Just tinkering for the sake of it.
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 20:25:00 -
[171]
dnt think i signed this one - oh well, even if i did, 2 sigs are better than one 
signed
|
Andarias
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 20:42:00 -
[172]
signed
|
Dark Silver
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 21:35:00 -
[173]
Signage!
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Arimai
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 22:46:00 -
[174]
Signed
|
Karneh Vorous
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 22:53:00 -
[175]
signed
|
Virusuk
|
Posted - 2005.07.12 23:50:00 -
[176]
Signed
|
Nerogk Shorn
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 00:02:00 -
[177]
signed!
|
StarStryder
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 00:07:00 -
[178]
signed
|
Warm0nger
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 00:23:00 -
[179]
Signed!
---------------------
Eve Spawn Grounds
|
fl0pski
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 00:56:00 -
[180]
signed
|
Amarr knight
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 05:32:00 -
[181]
Signed
|
StormX
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 06:08:00 -
[182]
Signed
|
Jamm0
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 07:45:00 -
[183]
signed
|
Soros
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 08:13:00 -
[184]
signed
-= Soros =-
= Firmux Ixion =
|
Gunstar Zero
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 08:49:00 -
[185]
Seems valid enough.
|
Aramova
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 08:58:00 -
[186]
Signed
--
"Evil will always triumph, because Concord is dumb..."
---Spaceballs Revised |
comanchero
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 11:31:00 -
[187]
Signed
|
Ankanos
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 12:06:00 -
[188]
considering this was touted as "new feature" back when it was
implemented.. (undocking with an overloaded powercore)
-kinda silly that they did this..
whats worse is now i have to unload some hi slot mods when i fill my mids
with structure repairs or lows w/armor reps to fix damage... just turning
them off does not suffice.. that, more than anything is very annoying..
/signed
--- |
|
CCP Hammer
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 12:45:00 -
[189]
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
|
|
voidvim
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 13:01:00 -
[190]
/sigened
|
Doc Brown
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:02:00 -
[191]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
Woot!
_________________________________________________
There are no bad ideas, only bad implementations. |
Chris
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:11:00 -
[192]
Signed.
|
Nyphur
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:11:00 -
[193]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
Good. I like cake. But more importantly, I like offlining one of my guns to fit a MWD to travel without taking up cargo space with the gun.
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:27:00 -
[194]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
ResetBonuses ();
AddSkillBonuses ();
AddShipBonuses ();
for (i = 0; i < module_count; ++i)
{
if (fitted_modules[i].is_online)
AddModuleBonuses (&fitted_modules[i]);
}
No?
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:39:00 -
[195]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
Forward CCP :)
|
Blind Fear
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 18:41:00 -
[196]
Edited by: Blind Fear on 13/07/2005 18:41:20
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
Hammer is the best dev ever.
|
0verkill
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 19:14:00 -
[197]
this was the worst change ever
Signed....
0verkill
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean we aren't out to get you.
|
Two Minds
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 19:15:00 -
[198]
signed*
|
Pride NL
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 19:20:00 -
[199]
i sign this 6x, for my alts too ;p
|
Ishbuanium
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 19:23:00 -
[200]
signed
|
Meridius
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 20:54:00 -
[201]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
Hammer 4tw
________________________________________________________
|
MickeyFinn
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 22:18:00 -
[202]
Signed
--------------------------------------
The Artist Formely Known As Wishdokkta |
Anchises
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 22:42:00 -
[203]
Signed
-- |
Tildaras Rellik'Cro
|
Posted - 2005.07.13 23:00:00 -
[204]
Signed.
I read the entire post. Not a single naysayer in the entire 11 pages.
|
Intergalactic Quant
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 00:39:00 -
[205]
Signed.
|
Fevair
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 03:24:00 -
[206]
Shut my cov ops friend up CCP!
Oh, and signed
|
The Hanz
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 03:34:00 -
[207]
Signed,
|
Desiderya
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 07:09:00 -
[208]
Signed...
|
Ecchus
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 07:59:00 -
[209]
I'm in.
It gots to be fixed.
==========
Towards thee I roll, thou all-destroying but unconquering whale; to the last I grapple with thee; from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee..
- Melville.
|
John Thorlake
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 08:28:00 -
[210]
Signed!
|
qwertyytrewq
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:11:00 -
[211]
signed
|
sallyr
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:11:00 -
[212]
signed
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)
|
PhalHell
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:37:00 -
[213]
Signed
|
malekai
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:39:00 -
[214]
/signed
|
Draec Sjet
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 09:54:00 -
[215]
signed
|
Chatuk
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 10:43:00 -
[216]
Signed
|
Dred 'Morte
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:10:00 -
[217]
/signed
|
Madeleine Moreau
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:23:00 -
[218]
signed  |
hired goon
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:29:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Tildaras Rellik'Cro
Signed.
I read the entire post. Not a single naysayer in the entire 11 pages.
Cheers mate, coz I skipped right to this last page wondering if there were any naysayers but wasn't bothered to check
Glad to see pirates and carebears can come together when needed.
Signed.
------------
We come in peace. And tanks. |
Nuhvok
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:29:00 -
[220]
Signed
|
UnAimedPlayer
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:31:00 -
[221]
Signed.
|
Quicken
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:35:00 -
[222]
I sign for this.
|
Caoimhe
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:59:00 -
[223]
moo
|
Nicodermus
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 11:59:00 -
[224]
Signed
|
Dash Ripcock
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 12:00:00 -
[225]
Signed.
Battle Angels Inc - The Movie |
Carth Jared
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 13:17:00 -
[226]
signed
ATUK Killboard | 5 Killboard
|
Bill Reaper
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 13:24:00 -
[227]
Edited by: Bill Reaper on 14/07/2005 13:26:08
Signed.
|
Diomede
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 13:26:00 -
[228]
Edited by: Diomede on 14/07/2005 13:26:20
Signed.
-Dio
|
DeeCo
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 13:47:00 -
[229]
Signed
with out the offlining, theres no way a cheetah can undock with a cloak and a probe launcher, its allways 8pg short !!
Click my sig for stats
|
xaja
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 17:08:00 -
[230]
it's really annoying.
Especially for these unannounced miserable little changes, it would be nice to get a "WHY" from CCP.
/signed
...
_____________________________________
I'm Paper; Rock's fine, nerf Scissors |
Dirus
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 17:21:00 -
[231]
Not signed.
**********
Everyone deserves to die.
You go first.
|
Lev's Ghost
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 19:25:00 -
[232]
SIGNED
|
Lisa Nichols
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 19:47:00 -
[233]
Hey, guys? You -can- launch while your modules exceed requirements.
I'm currently doing it right now. Cormorant, loaded up with about 500 tf and 100 MW worth of modules.. and I don't have but 265 and 63 available respectively with my current skills.
|
M'Ar Duk
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 21:31:00 -
[234]
signed
--------------------
[20:08:23] CapNMurphi > Who the hell is M'Ar Duk?
[20:08:59] StormyWaters2021 > The sun god, who dwells inside me.
[20:09:27] CapNMurphi > In front or in back? |
babo
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 21:38:00 -
[235]
this is driving me insane...
yes SIGNED
I hate this BUG
does your ship have a dronebay? If so, sign the petition.. |
Taraq Nord
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 22:23:00 -
[236]
Signed |
Bombcrater
|
Posted - 2005.07.14 23:26:00 -
[237]
Signed.
|
Willawaw
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 00:01:00 -
[238]
Signed
|
Insomniac
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 00:14:00 -
[239]
Signed.
 |
Biscuit
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 00:21:00 -
[240]
Signed
|
El Huapo
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 01:06:00 -
[241]
signed!
|
Sin Angel
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 01:21:00 -
[242]
signed
|
Azuriel
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 01:25:00 -
[243]
Signed |
Darkwolf
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 01:29:00 -
[244]
Signed. CCP, find better solutions.
|
Cmd Woodlouse
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 02:02:00 -
[245]
Signed.
-G- Pink Power |
Redwolf
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 02:48:00 -
[246]
Signed.
|
Altai Saker
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 03:25:00 -
[247]
Just thought I'd chime in to say
SIGNED
|
Sosipater
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 04:25:00 -
[248]
signed
|
Largbae
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 04:42:00 -
[249]
Signed with caveats:
1) Getting bonuses for offline modules is ridiculous.
2) Fitting modules that you can't possibly online is also dubious, but I thought the game used to have logic preventing that.
however...
If someone is willing to sacrifice active slots to run a convertible setup, CCP should leave it supported. |
Foulis
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 05:31:00 -
[250]
Signed
you should fix the source of the problem (modules still giving bonuses when offline).
|
Boonaki
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 08:23:00 -
[251]
signed
Fear the Ibis of doom. |
Kar'uthan
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 09:37:00 -
[252]
Signed - It makes the put online and offline functions redundant, except in lack of cpu cases.
|
Ace Garpy
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 16:00:00 -
[253]
Signed.
|
|
Abdalion
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 16:05:00 -
[254]
Locked for Spam.
Click.
--
I ♥ You.... Stolen from ErisŪ |
|
|
Abdalion
|
Posted - 2005.07.15 16:09:00 -
[255]
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Yeah, I hate this one too. I've moaned numerous times "what do you mean I can't undock??!?"
I think I have a way this can be fixed, we can have our cake and eat it too.
^^^^ No more spam please, here is the answer.
Problem is being looked at.
--
I ♥ You.... Stolen from ErisŪ |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |