EVE Search - Incursions Start here.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Missions & Complexes

Incursions Start here.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 25 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Kate stark 481	Posted - 2013.10.08 14:34:00 - [451] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Kate stark wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: The Marauder changes are now on Sisi. I urge all groups that use Marauders in Incursions to get the new iteration (653 MB) loaded asap and start getting groups together to test running inc's on Sisi. There is a very small window for feedback, and if you have any interest in using these ships in incursions in the future, make you voice heard. the changes to marauders are irrelevant without the changes to pirate hulls being announced. Say what? Yes, changes are coming to pirate hulls, likely nerfs. But that does not change the effectiveness, or lack of effectiveness, of Marauders in Incursions. Changes to the effectiveness of pirate hulls will alter the relative effectiveness between the 2, but if Maraurders are ruined by these changes, then no amount of nerfing of the pirate hulls will save the Marauder. The new Marauders HAVE to be tested to see what the impact is on their perfromance. we don't HAVE to test them, EFT clearly shows the differences and the substantial lack of drone bay, speed, and tank, which does not make up for the tracking bonus when comparing the vargur to the machariel. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Gimme more Cynos Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 77	Posted - 2013.10.10 00:16:00 - [452] - Quote Golem is crap for Pve at the moment, and will remain crap with the proposed changes. While the changes make some sense, it wont make the Golem better than it is now. You don't even need to test it. It doesn't offer any significant advantage over cnr, sni or the Tyfi. It's just slow, got no drones ,it takes ageeeees to lock and the dmg application doesnt do that good compared to the cnr. Buffer is lolololz so you cant pimp it reasonable either without beeing a pinata. Some might argue that E-war immunity and increased projection-range is worth all those nerfs - I say they aren't. E-war isn't a problem in a CNR, SNI or a TyFi, as faction ships got huge sensor strength allready. Even the infamous Assault gets you jammed maybe twice. Golem needs some serious tweaking towards a usefull role, or more general changes to missiles to be worth it (talking about TD affecting missiles/ more mid-slot modules for damage application and projection). At the moment, other ships are crushing the golems shoes, and it has no reasoable role which isn't done better by other missile-boats at the moment. DMG application and projection = CNR tanking = SNI DMG + mobility = TyFi If we add the fact that the golem gets outdamaged because it doesn't have sentries - all other missile ships do better damage - it becomes even more obvious. Effectively, the golem trades too much gank for needless tank. Now go check what PvE'ers usually do while fitting their ships, and you might get an Idea of what to do with them. Just add 50% more damage against NPC's and give them the goddamn freaking T2 RESISTS they deserve as T2 ships and you're fine. It needs it's own useful place to be worth in PvE - but MJD and huge active tanking are probably the least useful bonuses within the missile-boat lineup (don't start with this "you can trade more tank for gank nowz" - **** - how many TP's shall I field? 3 isn't enough?). So what should we do with the golem? I don't know, but I'm damn sure I won't be using this joke of a ship for PvE at all - and no, transforming a ship is no reason to fly it either (!).
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 538	Posted - 2013.10.10 00:59:00 - [453] - Quote Pirate hull BS ''(Re)balance' will not take place in Rubicon. So I am sure the Incursion boat preference will remain the same for at least another 6 months. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Jasmine Assasin State War Academy Caldari State 38	Posted - 2013.10.10 15:30:00 - [454] - Quote Gimme more Cynos wrote: Golem is crap for Pve at the moment, and will remain crap with the proposed changes. While the changes make some sense, it wont make the Golem better than it is now. [snipped for brevity] I tested the Golem with a maxed out shield/missile pilot on sisi (using tech II fit) and found the golem to work just fine. When the new mirror is up I'll be able to test a pimped Golem and I have no doubts it'll do even better.
Gimme more Cynos Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 77	Posted - 2013.10.13 13:20:00 - [455] - Quote Jasmine Assasin wrote: Gimme more Cynos wrote: Golem is crap for Pve at the moment, and will remain crap with the proposed changes. While the changes make some sense, it wont make the Golem better than it is now. [snipped for brevity] I tested the Golem with a maxed out shield/missile pilot on sisi (using tech II fit) and found the golem to work just fine. When the new mirror is up I'll be able to test a pimped Golem and I have no doubts it'll do even better. Please show me PvE content where the only advantage of a marauder (hint: the oversized tank) can be useful. I can't see it.
Kalvarus Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 1	Posted - 2013.10.13 21:39:00 - [456] - Quote Ok, so since I haven't had much luck running my own private fleets, and my computer cant quite handle 11 accounts loaded at once....Im searching for a community or group that I can run a hand full of my alts (via multiboxing) for Vanguard sites. I have up to 8 DPS pilots available at the moment. I can fly logi too...but its much easier and efficient for me to just focus on DPS. Online now and looking to run sites regularly. Please either convo me or eve mail me with any suggestions. Thanks!
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 540	Posted - 2013.10.13 23:45:00 - [457] - Quote Kalvarus wrote: Ok, so since I haven't had much luck running my own private fleets, and my computer cant quite handle 11 accounts loaded at once....Im searching for a community or group that I can run a hand full of my alts (via multiboxing) for Vanguard sites. I have up to 8 DPS pilots available at the moment. I can fly logi too...but its much easier and efficient for me to just focus on DPS. Online now and looking to run sites regularly. Please either convo me or eve mail me with any suggestions. Thanks! If it's a daily thing you might want to add the EVE-time you will be on. So they can find you, or plan to find you and fill in the gaps of your Box fleet. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 546	Posted - 2013.10.16 20:08:00 - [458] - Quote I heard some rumors that ICU is becoming WIN, anyone have a more informed viewpoint on this so I can update the OP. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
PopplerRo 6	Posted - 2013.10.17 03:16:00 - [459] - Quote Goldiiee wrote: I heard some rumors that ICU is becoming WIN, anyone have a more informed viewpoint on this so I can update the OP. obvious troll obviously wasn't obvious enough, but there is a group split off from Lv6 due to internal 'drama' which are calling themselves WIN, Lv6 has renamed itself to F.F.A.
Kate stark 664	Posted - 2013.10.19 07:27:00 - [460] - Quote Goldiiee wrote: I heard some rumors that ICU is becoming WIN, anyone have a more informed viewpoint on this so I can update the OP. may i suggest joining the mailing lists? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 547	Posted - 2013.10.19 16:02:00 - [461] - Quote Kate stark wrote: Goldiiee wrote: I heard some rumors that ICU is becoming WIN, anyone have a more informed viewpoint on this so I can update the OP. may i suggest joining the mailing lists? I am on a bunch of the mailing lists, not sure if I got all of them. I got the troll mail that made me ask what was going on, I guess I was a little more gullible the other day than normal. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Lipbite Express Hauler 1105	Posted - 2013.10.19 18:15:00 - [462] - Quote There is new initiative by some of TVP members regarding incursions in null-sec: service for local alliances to clear incursions from their space. Check channel TVP.null for details. Not sure there it will end up but anyway it sounds a bit more interesting than incursion-less weekends.
Lancelot Trueshot Four Pillar Production Headshot Gaming 0	Posted - 2013.10.20 08:14:00 - [463] - Quote I am looking for a group/channel who runs high sec inc on a scheduled basis and not on the drop by wen you are on and we will see if a fleet is running. Something like we will run in 3 days from dt for x hours who can be online at this moment? Can someone point be towards a channel/group that works that way? Shield/armor no importance. I speak eng + ger + fr I have been flying inc for 6 month on an occasional basis. Flying full t2 amarr armor pulse laser atm but don't mind at all skilling into shield, beam and/or nightmare.
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 548	Posted - 2013.10.22 21:02:00 - [464] - Quote LV6 restructured and became WIN, so I updated it in the OP, let me know if there is anything else I need to add, take away, or change. Thanks Goldiiee Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Balam Acab Indecent Reponse Team 0	Posted - 2013.10.24 00:00:00 - [465] - Quote derp
Anya Klibor Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete. 507	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:33:00 - [466] - Quote Goldiiee wrote: LV6 restructured and became WIN, so I updated it in the OP, let me know if there is anything else I need to add, take away, or change. Thanks Goldiiee I would add that the characters Mineral Ore and Community Replacement are attempting to scam more people in the Incursion channels claiming he is a legitimate SRP character. He has already stolen one SRP prior to Lv6's disbanding, and refuses to transfer what was paid in by Lv6 members to go to the current leadership of Lv6.
Lipbite Express Hauler 1121	Posted - 2013.10.25 06:59:00 - [467] - Quote Anya Klibor wrote: Goldiiee wrote: LV6 restructured and became WIN, so I updated it in the OP, let me know if there is anything else I need to add, take away, or change. Thanks Goldiiee I would add that the characters Mineral Ore and Community Replacement are attempting to scam more people in the Incursion channels claiming he is a legitimate SRP character. He has already stolen one SRP prior to Lv6's disbanding, and refuses to transfer what was paid in by Lv6 members to go to the current leadership of Lv6. I though he was Lv6 SRP and just refused to give up accumulated 30bil to another pilot. If it's true it's hardly a theft.
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 551	Posted - 2013.10.25 07:06:00 - [468] - Quote Lipbite wrote: Anya Klibor wrote: Goldiiee wrote: LV6 restructured and became WIN, so I updated it in the OP, let me know if there is anything else I need to add, take away, or change. Thanks Goldiiee I would add that the characters Mineral Ore and Community Replacement are attempting to scam more people in the Incursion channels claiming he is a legitimate SRP character. He has already stolen one SRP prior to Lv6's disbanding, and refuses to transfer what was paid in by Lv6 members to go to the current leadership of Lv6. I though he was Lv6 SRP and just refused to give up accumulated 30bil to another pilot. If it's true it's hardly a theft. Makes me wonder if any SRP has not ended up in someone's wallet (Not in the communities grasp), brings back memories of 'MeFirst' to name just one. Even though it is important to protect new pilots, I don't know if (Or how) it should be added in the OP. I'll think about it this morning and add something informative as soon as I can get it worded in my head. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 551	Posted - 2013.10.25 10:26:00 - [469] - Quote New pilots be careful and be sure you're actually paying for an SRP and not an elaborate Long Con. There is a bit of ongoing drama about SRPGÇÖs (Ship Replacement Programs), My personal take on these is a bit skewed but here it is anyways. In case you donGÇÖt know SRP, SRF, DRF or whatever they want to call it is a program to pay for the replacement of ships lost in fleet. There are a few problems I have with this. First, why are you losing ships? A well planned and working fleet doesnGÇÖt lose ships, if the LogiGÇÖs are paying attention and you are paying attention there is really no reason to lose a ship. The sites donGÇÖt have enough DPS to kill you if the FC is doing his job and keeping a proper balance of DPS and Logistics. Second, if the fleet failed you and let your ship die, then the fleet should pay for the replacement. In every case of a ship loss I have seen, the fleet compensated the pilot, many times they compensated the pilot with more ISK than he lost. This also relates to the competence of the Pilot who lost the ship, if he was getting shot and didnGÇÖt broadcast, then verbally ask, and then scream for reps, it begs the question: What was he doing when he was losing his ship? Because realistically all the FC was asking him to do was watch his screen, shoot the little red crosses, and broadcast for reps when he gets Yellow boxed. If he canGÇÖt do those three things itGÇÖs probably because he was doing something else, so why should the fleet or community pay for him to do something else? And last, I have seen three SRFGÇÖs disappear in the last 18 months into the wallets of greedy, self absorbed GÇÿCommunity leadersGÇÖ with the amount varying from 8 billion to 50 billion ISK (Might have been 80 billion, memory fades). At no point and time have I seen a fleet lose a 50 billion ISK ship, for that matter I havenGÇÖt seen (due to the fault of the fleet) a 10 billion ISK ship lost in a site. Really, think about it? If a pilot is flying a 50 billion ISK ship and loses it without having checked to make sure the fleet was capable of keeping him alive and then the simple -Broadcast, Ask, Scream- when yellow boxed, he probably didnGÇÖt want to keep that shiny ship anyways. So why would a community realistically need 50 billion is petty cash, unless someone had plans to steal it, and harvest forum tears. Ultimately giving any one individual the 'Community Pot' will always end in tears, but ignoring that glaring reality I have heard of several problems with collecting on a SRP such as; Your particular situation did not fall into the narrow circumstances that provide for a replacement. Your particular modules were not covered by the fund. Or they just donGÇÖt like you enough to pay for your replacement. Add to that the definite possibility of the fund getting hijacked and used to pay for someoneGÇÖs SuperCap loss-mail dreams, seems like a recipe for disaster. Just my two cents. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Charadrass DIN-Flotten 76	Posted - 2013.10.25 13:21:00 - [470] - Quote At least at DIN every FC with Hands on to the DIN-SRP has multiple times more isk than the SRP has and will have in wallet. Don't know why other communities give poor FCs access to the srp wallet. DIN uses a Corporation with currently 4 FCs having alt toons in it. Every FC in that Corporation has way over 300 Billion in ISK, the most of them much more, so there is no reason for us to steal change money from the SRP. A side note to Goldiiee, you cannot plan or missplan a disconnecting logistic or whatever can happen through the Internet. Our SRP covers losses only if the victim didn't made a mistake i.e. not broadcasting. So, SRP yes or no? It's up to the Pilot in DIN-Fleets. We dont force the Pilots to pay it. It is completely optional plus we have 3 different insurances, depending on deposit. Ingame Mailinglist: dinsrp for further Information.

Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 551	Posted - 2013.10.25 15:09:00 - [471] - Quote Charadrass wrote: At least at DIN every FC with Hands on to the DIN-SRP has multiple times more isk than the SRP has and will have in wallet. Don't know why other communities give poor FCs access to the srp wallet. DIN uses a Corporation with currently 4 FCs having alt toons in it. Every FC in that Corporation has way over 300 Billion in ISK, the most of them much more, so there is no reason for us to steal change money from the SRP. A side note to Goldiiee, you cannot plan or missplan a disconnecting logistic or whatever can happen through the Internet. Our SRP covers losses only if the victim didn't made a mistake i.e. not broadcasting. So, SRP yes or no? It's up to the Pilot in DIN-Fleets. We dont force the Pilots to pay it. It is completely optional plus we have 3 different insurances, depending on deposit. Ingame Mailinglist: dinsrp for further Information. A well thought out and transparent plan, one that a new pilot can trust. Beware of FC's that say they have a plan that is not laid out like DIN's. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Lunkwill Khashour Red Federation RvB - RED Federation 159	Posted - 2013.10.25 19:34:00 - [472] - Quote Do strategic cruisers (Legion/Loki) still have a role in high-end incursions or are advanced battleships(Paladin, Bhaal, Krono, Vindi, Mach, Nightmare) the only viable ships in town?
Anya Klibor Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete. 507	Posted - 2013.10.25 21:33:00 - [473] - Quote Lipbite wrote: Anya Klibor wrote: Goldiiee wrote: LV6 restructured and became WIN, so I updated it in the OP, let me know if there is anything else I need to add, take away, or change. Thanks Goldiiee I would add that the characters Mineral Ore and Community Replacement are attempting to scam more people in the Incursion channels claiming he is a legitimate SRP character. He has already stolen one SRP prior to Lv6's disbanding, and refuses to transfer what was paid in by Lv6 members to go to the current leadership of Lv6. I though he was Lv6 SRP and just refused to give up accumulated 30bil to another pilot. If it's true it's hardly a theft. He refused to transfer to the ISK to Sinderella Pain, WIN's current leader despite the agreement having the clause that if the majority of the community left Lv6 the SRP followed to an appropriate character. He refused to give it up as he claimed it was a "coup" and he wasn't giving ANYTHING up to WIN (rthough we could still pay into the SRP, and maybe we'd get use out of it).
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 552	Posted - 2013.10.25 22:28:00 - [474] - Quote Lunkwill Khashour wrote: Do strategic cruisers (Legion/Loki) still have a role in high-end incursions or are advanced battleships(Paladin, Bhaal, Krono, Vindi, Mach, Nightmare) the only viable ships in town? I know ISN stopped using Loki's, I am not sure about the rest of the communities, I will check and get back too you. Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Nefra Ravenheart Ravenheart Enterprises LLC. 9	Posted - 2013.10.26 00:41:00 - [475] - Quote TDF uses Legions and the occasional Loki.
PopplerRo 6	Posted - 2013.10.26 01:37:00 - [476] - Quote Anya Klibor wrote: He refused to transfer to the ISK to Sinderella Pain, WIN's current leader despite the agreement having the clause that if the majority of the community left Lv6 the SRP followed to an appropriate character. He refused to give it up as he claimed it was a "coup" and he wasn't giving ANYTHING up to WIN (rthough we could still pay into the SRP, and maybe we'd get use out of it). Even though I feel the very concept of srps for non-pvp activites to be stupid, why should a pilot who plotted to leave their respective community and take fcs and members with them to form a new group have access to the srp of the community they tried to overthrow? It's equally as plausible that this was a scheme for the 'leader' of the new group to gain access to the isk, If they trusted and lead fleets well then the srp would not even be an issue.
Goldiiee Tax and War Haven 552	Posted - 2013.10.27 10:07:00 - [477] - Quote Take a look at this thread in F&I and +1 it for me. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3790560#post3790560 I agree and think the re-spawn timers need to be revisited by CCP Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.
Kodavor No Swag Initiative 107	Posted - 2013.10.29 07:35:00 - [478] - Quote Back on top .
Sexy Cakes Have A Seat 458	Posted - 2013.10.29 13:06:00 - [479] - Quote Can someone explain to me why the incursion communities are constantly at each others throats these days and insist on shutting off the ISK faucet just to spite each other? Not today spaghetti.
Zor'katar Matari Recreation 185	Posted - 2013.10.29 13:25:00 - [480] - Quote Sexy Cakes wrote: Can someone explain to me why the incursion communities are constantly at each others throats these days and insist on shutting off the ISK faucet just to spite each other? My semi-cynical guess? Community leaders have become so fat off the profits that actually running incursions is no longer as interesting as using their position to generate drama. (Edit: not intending to imply that all community leaders are like that. It only takes a few.)



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 .. 25 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.