| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
James Achassious
Thee Almitee Ones
The Unforgiven Alliance
0
   |
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:31:00 -
[121] - Quote
*Insert sarcasm* Well this is great!  *End sarcasm* I just started the game and felt so accomplished when I finally upgraded from a Caracal to a Drake a day or so ago. Only to find today that this amazing upgrade *Re-enter sarcasm* gave a whopping 1!!! more missile launcher! Thats exactly what I was working all this time as a begining player for! Thanks for the update, I so fricken happy. This reeeally makes me wanna keep playing EVE! *End sarcasm, Insert middle finger*
|
James Achassious
Thee Almitee Ones
The Unforgiven Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:33:00 -
[122] - Quote
Reiken VonPain wrote:I do like the Idea of rebalancing the battle cruisers and i don't have any issues with it except one. The drake, why'd ya have to take away a missile hard point? that'll make missioning and PVP harder. I don't think the change from 5% to 10% missile kinetic damage bonus makes up for the DPS of an extra missile launcher.
I agree completely with you. |
Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:34:00 -
[123] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade.
Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining. That's not the point. I don't want to be forced to use only a certain type ship to do what i need to at that time. The thing that brought me to this game ( years ago ) was the fact that so many options are available on so many ships that you could outfit to your liking. The whole curtailed and role set mindset that all these mmo's are taking as of late is just bad business for us, good for them. As people would just be able to hurry look up the best outfit and just get that then doing research and outfitting to there need for what they are doing. People are slowly being forced to use only a certain type setup to be-able to compete with other setups or you are left behind if you choose not to use that certain setup. I am not going to get into the argument about how this ship is better or that can be better if you do that, that is the whole point for having options so you can choose for yourself what you think is better, even if others think it's not. Not pre ordained rules. All ships are have always been made for specific roles, these rules are simply being made more defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. You still have plenty of options. In fact you have more options than you did before. You seem to be complaining that one ship can do slightly less than it could before... well that ship WAS broken. Get over it.
As someone running for CSM you really need to listen to and read what the people want and or say. Maybe it is just me, if so and others say so i will not say anymore. But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you should not be in a position of CSM as you already made up your mind and do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same.
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
chris1945
Ambivalence Co-operative
Black Thorne Alliance
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:34:00 -
[124] - Quote
Corporation Search Tools:
I am still missing the search option for tax. And the search preview does not show the tax. Have to check corp info first. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3971
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:48:00 -
[125] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same.
I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is.
Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane).
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1619
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:06:00 -
[126] - Quote
OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu?
Also, CCP the wording states "Settle our differences without interference" is a little misleading. Players can still interfere. I suggest adding "their":
"...CONCORD will allow us to settle our differences without their interference..."
Indicating that concord will stay away.
http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3972
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:10:00 -
[127] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu?
Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header
First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:12:00 -
[128] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is. Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane).
Yeah i noticed that, i was not paying attention so i edited it. derp... I just liked being able to have the option before with the Ferox in particular, I could run 1-2 all day long with kestrel and 3s no problem with Ferox outfitted right. But i could also refit for pvp if i wanted, I am not saying it was the best but it held it's own. My point is being able to refit like that was great! so many options. Now if i would like to use missiles i am forced to use drake and so on. That does limit my options. I understand about the OP of the drake but that could have also been taken care of by just changing around the bonuses at first including the ferox if they decided it to was unbalanced, not a complete remake. Start small and move up as it were.
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
Pantson Head
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham
Industrial Technonauts
25
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:13:00 -
[129] - Quote
James Achassious wrote:Reiken VonPain wrote:I do like the Idea of rebalancing the battle cruisers and i don't have any issues with it except one. The drake, why'd ya have to take away a missile hard point? that'll make missioning and PVP harder. I don't think the change from 5% to 10% missile kinetic damage bonus makes up for the DPS of an extra missile launcher. I agree completely with you.
Simple math disagrees with you both. Whatever you may think, you now have 9 effective launchers on your drake, as opposed to the 8.75 effective launchers you had yesterday. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3974
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:15:00 -
[130] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is. Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane). Yeah i noticed that, i was not paying attention so i edited it. derp... I just liked being able to have the option before with the Ferox in particular, I could run 1-2 all day long with kestrel and 3s no problem with Ferox outfitted right. But i could also refit for pvp if i wanted, I am not saying it was the best but it held it's own. My point is being able to refit like that was great! so many options. Now if i would like to use missiles i am forced to use drake and so on. That does limit my options. I understand about the OP of the drake but that could have also been taken care of by just changing around the bonuses at first including the ferox if they decided it to was unbalanced, not a complete remake. Start small and move up as it were.
If you ask me having five unbonused launchers on the Ferox doesn't really count as an "option".
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
|
|
Google Voices
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:16:00 -
[131] - Quote
So, I actually bothered to read the patch notes, and I don't see an explanation for this.
Trying to build a Prowler in a station.....
"This product cannot be manufactured at this facility."
Well played?
"Fozzie could not comment on when this issue would be resolved and stated that GÇ£one day Veritas will come up to me and say GÇÿhey I fixed off-grid boostingGÇÖGÇ¥, but he had no idea on a potential timeframe for this sort of miracle." |
Lord Thingol
Polonia Kamikaze
Honey Badger Coalition
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:19:00 -
[132] - Quote
Pantson Head wrote:James Achassious wrote:Reiken VonPain wrote:I do like the Idea of rebalancing the battle cruisers and i don't have any issues with it except one. The drake, why'd ya have to take away a missile hard point? that'll make missioning and PVP harder. I don't think the change from 5% to 10% missile kinetic damage bonus makes up for the DPS of an extra missile launcher. I agree completely with you. Simple math disagrees with you both. Whatever you may think, you now have 9 effective launchers on your drake, as opposed to the 8.75 effective launchers you had yesterday.
As long as you are using kinetic missiles. Because if you don't, it drops from 7 to 6. |
kyrieee
Snuff Box
108
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:21:00 -
[133] - Quote
There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels |
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:25:00 -
[134] - Quote
kyrieee wrote:There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu? Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P
 |
Flag Bravo
12
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:27:00 -
[135] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:
Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself.
Exactly. Being now forced into zhit fits is no fun at all. The fun was in the freedom to build and experiment, now its "put piece A into hole A, shove dongle B up orifice B" and so forth.
Dull.
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3974
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:30:00 -
[136] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:kyrieee wrote:There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels James Amril-Kesh wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu? Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P
I get your point, but I really don't want to be harassed with duel invites whenever I go to a market hub.
It's not that I think it's a bad game mechanic, I just don't personally want to use it.
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
Da Dom
Wii R
42
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:32:00 -
[137] - Quote
Kewl patch guys.
The routes in space look awesome and really make me feel like I am in a VR universe.
Do you intend on seeding the BPO's for the AAR's anytime soon? Can't find them anywhere, not even in Jita 
If your liberty is won by others then you are not free, you are merely protected. You who have enjoyed freedom, who have done nothing to earn it, your time has come. This time you will stand alone and fight for yourselves. Now you will pay for your freedom in the currency of honest toil and human blood |
Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:33:00 -
[138] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is. Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane). Yeah i noticed that, i was not paying attention so i edited it. derp... I just liked being able to have the option before with the Ferox in particular, I could run 1-2 all day long with kestrel and 3s no problem with Ferox outfitted right. But i could also refit for pvp if i wanted, I am not saying it was the best but it held it's own. My point is being able to refit like that was great! so many options. Now if i would like to use missiles i am forced to use drake and so on. That does limit my options. I understand about the OP of the drake but that could have also been taken care of by just changing around the bonuses at first including the ferox if they decided it to was unbalanced, not a complete remake. Start small and move up as it were. If you ask me having five unbonused launchers on the Ferox doesn't really count as an "option".
Personally i would run 4 launchers and 2 turrets or mix it up depending on what i was doing. Again that was my own personal choice, you get where I am going with this? I now only have the choice to use a bonused drake for missiles. And only because they changed the bonus higher. i think ferox was 10% to hybrid / and 5% to shield per level. And I think drake was 5 and 5 to shield and missiles. I originally chose Ferox due to drake being so ugly, but i still had the option to run launchers if i wanted to. Why because it is not a bonus should it be taken away? should the orca just be a freighter and not a miner also as the covetor has 4% better yield on strip miners and can do the same thing minus cargo? just saying///
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:33:00 -
[139] - Quote
Da Dom wrote:Kewl patch guys. The routes in space look awesome and really make me feel like I am in a VR universe. Do you intend on seeding the BPO's for the AAR's anytime soon? Can't find them anywhere, not even in Jita
Agree!!
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
Google Voices
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:36:00 -
[140] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:Da Dom wrote:Kewl patch guys. The routes in space look awesome and really make me feel like I am in a VR universe. Do you intend on seeding the BPO's for the AAR's anytime soon? Can't find them anywhere, not even in Jita Agree!!
Yet, there are a dozen on sale in Jita atm, so they must be seeded somewhere....
"Fozzie could not comment on when this issue would be resolved and stated that GÇ£one day Veritas will come up to me and say GÇÿhey I fixed off-grid boostingGÇÖGÇ¥, but he had no idea on a potential timeframe for this sort of miracle." |
|
|
Ayvonne Corlinn
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:38:00 -
[141] - Quote
Quote:GÇóThe business tutorial will now award a Venture in all cases, previously some races were still awarded the old mining frigates.
Wtf is the point of that when, despite its being pointed out COUNTLESS times, the tutorial STILL doesn't give the newbie a mining laser of any sort to use in Mission 3? |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3974
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:39:00 -
[142] - Quote
Ayvonne Corlinn wrote:Quote:GÇóThe business tutorial will now award a Venture in all cases, previously some races were still awarded the old mining frigates. Wtf is the point of that when, despite its being pointed out COUNTLESS times, the tutorial STILL doesn't give the newbie a mining laser of any sort to use in Mission 3?
If this is true that's also definitely something that needs to be fixed.
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
kyrieee
Snuff Box
108
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:42:00 -
[143] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:kyrieee wrote:There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels James Amril-Kesh wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu? Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P
lool I'm blind |
Ayvonne Corlinn
State War Academy
Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:43:00 -
[144] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oraac Ensor wrote:kyrieee wrote:There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels James Amril-Kesh wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu? Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P I get your point, but I really don't want to be harassed with duel invites whenever I go to a market hub. It's not that I think it's a bad game mechanic, I just don't personally want to use it.
Eh? What point?
I simply pointed out to kyrieee that you had already answered his question. |
Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
779
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:43:00 -
[145] - Quote
Holy cow, Dueling system! realy.... CCP realy ? CCP ? CCP is dueling system in EvE online for real ? i can believe but is fact!
Cool! is nice to see that EvE may evole and move froward, awesome thanks, time to prepare some t1 cruisers.
EvE isn't game, its style of living. |
Lord Thingol
Polonia Kamikaze
Honey Badger Coalition
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:45:00 -
[146] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Naga #1
Rokh #3
Caracal #4
Drake #6
Yep, Caldari is definitely worst for PVP.
Wonder what weapons Caldari should use ?
1425mm AutoCannon II24,259
2Heavy Pulse Laser II21,906
3200mm AutoCannon II21,551
4220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II20,007
5720mm Howitzer Artillery II18,941
61400mm Howitzer Artillery II17,426
7Mega Pulse Laser II16,833
8Neutron Blaster Cannon II16,430
9Light Neutron Blaster II16,313
10Heavy Missile Launcher II14,661
11150mm Light AutoCannon II14,410
12125mm Gatling AutoCannon II11,290
13Prototype 'Arbalest' Torpedo Launcher10,672
14Heavy Neutron Blaster II10,189
15425mm Railgun II9,401
16Light Ion Blaster II8,292
17Focused Medium Pulse Laser II7,689
18425mm Compressed Coil Gun I6,976
19Small Focused Pulse Laser II6,965
20Heavy Electron Blaster II6,457
Projectile : 127,884 kills
Hybrids : 81,747 kills
Energy : 53,393 Kills
Missiles 14,661 kills (+ torpedoes 10,672)
We can clearly see, that rockets really needed nerf...
|
Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
163
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:49:00 -
[147] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oraac Ensor wrote:kyrieee wrote:There needs to be an option to auto-reject all duels James Amril-Kesh wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:OK, I must be going blind. Where is the "Dueling: Auto reject" option in the esc menu? Audio & Chat tab, right panel, Dueling header First thing I looked for when I logged in. :P I get your point, but I really don't want to be harassed with duel invites whenever I go to a market hub. It's not that I think it's a bad game mechanic, I just don't personally want to use it.
What point?
I just indicated to kyrieee that you had already answered his question. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation
RAZOR Alliance
3974
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:51:00 -
[148] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:
What point?
I just indicated to kyrieee that you had already answered his question.
Oh. Nevermind.
Malcanis for CSM 8
Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
Rasmier
Endless Winter Night
R O G U E
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:52:00 -
[149] - Quote
2 bugs:
1. when scanning, left-click drag no longer works in solar system map
2. When running complexes(anoms?) the last wave warps off after roughly 5-10 seconds |
Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:54:00 -
[150] - Quote
Flag Bravo wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:
Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself.
Exactly. Being now forced into zhit fits is no fun at all. The fun was in the freedom to build and experiment, now its "put piece A into hole A, shove dongle B up orifice B" and so forth. Dull.
Exactly my freaking point haha, They are simplifying the game because people complain it is to hard. Well if anyone was around playing World of warcraft back when it first started and the 3nd expansion people started complaining about how hard the game was having to do this little thing or compare things or experiment etc. Well 2 expansions later you log on to the game and you don't even have to do anything to get everything in the game anymore. and i quote "just by playing you get everything"..... The people ruined the game because there was always something wrong or to many options it took to long to do this or that etc. Now everyone is starting to leave the game. I know because i own shares in Activision the parent company of Blizzard. They tried to carter to the players to keep and or make there stocks rise and it screwed the players in the end. In no way am i saying EvE is remotely close to WoW in a playing sense but don't forget money and greed corrupts and if left unchecked will screw the bread givers. Just my opinion as I have seen it from the other side as well as the game side.
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |