Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Rammix
FreeWorkers HeII Gate Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 18:44:00 -
[91] - Quote
One more issue: right-clicking on the system map while scanning sometimes makes focus rapidly 'jump' in an irritating manner. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
FreeWorkers HeII Gate Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 18:52:00 -
[92] - Quote
Quote:Covert Cynosural Field Generators may now be fitted on any Strategic Cruiser that has the Covert Reconfiguration subsystem fitted, as well as on Blockade Runners. Crane (caldari blocade runner) has only 1 high slot and this patch is useless for it. Please, add +1 high slot to the crane. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3962
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:01:00 -
[93] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Quote:Covert Cynosural Field Generators may now be fitted on any Strategic Cruiser that has the Covert Reconfiguration subsystem fitted, as well as on Blockade Runners. Crane (caldari blocade runner) has only 1 high slot and this patch is useless for it. Please, add +1 high slot to the crane. So does the VIator and Prorator. The only BR that has two high slots is the Prowler. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Pic'n dor
Epsilon Lyr Nulli Secunda
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:02:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jita is TiDi 21% 
Dueling at his best ? 
Anyone want a freighter warp speed buff ?? I can see me aging while warping !!  
Thx for black ops buff > while try it ASAP :) |

roy oakes
Pimebeka Industrial Mining Productions Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:10:00 -
[95] - Quote
well, i just spent the better part of a year training to make my drake half ass effective, already had poor dps now its even worse, may as well scrap the ship totaly or make it into a hauler |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
2015
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:16:00 -
[96] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Having to go through all of my overviews manually to add attack battlecruisers is irritating at best. CCP should have updated these automatically instead of forcing everyone to manually update all of their overviews (which I'm sure for some people means quite a few).
In addition, mousing over a ship bracket in space no longer shows information for that ship until clicked on. Please fix this.
Thanks for the heads-up!
Also the hover info missing is pretty bad.
And the info panels waste a massive amount of space above them, otherwise looks good.
Rendering tweaks make my gfx card work less? Just a butt feeling.
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Mysa
Alekhine's Gun
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:19:00 -
[97] - Quote
"New skill Armor Honeycombing has been added."
Whatever nobhead that came up whit honeyHONEYcombing needs to be namned and shamed!! What and how were has that to do anything whit the word mass?!? SoloFoLife! -KEKE the Merlin wonder |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3964
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:20:00 -
[98] - Quote
roy oakes wrote:well, i just spent the better part of a year training to make my drake half ass effective, already had poor dps now its even worse, may as well scrap the ship totaly or make it into a hauler At level 5 battlecruiser:
Old bonus: 5% kinetic missile damage per level - 7 launchers 1.25 * 7 = 8.75 effective launchers
New bonus: 10% kinetic missile damage per level - 6 launchers 1.5 * 6 = 9 effective launchers
At level 4 battlecruiser: Old: 1.2 * 7 = 8.4 eff. launchers New: 1.4 * 6 = 8.4 eff. launchers
At level 3: Old: 1.15 * 7 = 8.05 eff. launchers New: 1.3 * 6 = 7.8 eff. launchers
So you get the same DPS out of your Drake at BC 4, and slightly more at BC 5. You only get less DPS if you have BC trained to 3 or less. So train up, which you should be anyway. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

roy oakes
Pimebeka Industrial Mining Productions Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:20:00 -
[99] - Quote
Mysa wrote:"New skill Armor Honeycombing has been added."
Whatever nobhead that came up whit honeyHONEYcombing needs to be namned and shamed!! What and how were has that to do anything whit the word mass?!?
must be full of holes |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3964
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:24:00 -
[100] - Quote
Mysa wrote:"New skill Armor Honeycombing has been added."
Whatever nobhead that came up whit honeyHONEYcombing needs to be namned and shamed!! What and how were has that to do anything whit the word mass?!? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=honeycomb+armor Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |
|

Jalen1
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:25:00 -
[101] - Quote
cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 |

Jeldan
Red Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:32:00 -
[102] - Quote
Vortos Yvormes wrote:There is entirely too much wasted space between the info panels and the top of the screen. If there is a way to adjust the positioning, I cannot find it for the life of me.
While it's not terrible it would be nice to remove those "solar system" and "A" icons too. The idea is great but it REALLY takes away from the "Clean" look of the previous interface. And as mentioned above that gap is HUGE. Please give us the option to either adjust the placement with snap-to-edge ability included (like the overview, chat, and other pannels) or just take those info pannel additions away.
Additionally, please return the autopilot functionalities back to the star map windows. I'm not saying remove the new functionality you have added to the route info pannel but the one in the star map was great.
Or just give us the option to chose between the interface style (or interface components) we want.
Overall though great work guys - LOVE the autopilot routelines (could be a little more visable). |

Yigal Tzadok
Omni Corp.
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:33:00 -
[103] - Quote
just received -3,20 standing from unknown faction (concord) for a ship i lost |

Xercodo
Xovoni Directorate
2183
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:38:00 -
[104] - Quote
Vortos Yvormes wrote:There is entirely too much wasted space between the info panels and the top of the screen. If there is a way to adjust the positioning, I cannot find it for the life of me.
That's where the combat timers go. The Drake is a Lie |

MainDrain
7th Deepari Defence Armada
146
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:40:00 -
[105] - Quote
roy oakes wrote:well, i just spent the better part of a year training to make my drake half ass effective, already had poor dps now its even worse, may as well scrap the ship totaly or make it into a hauler
My understanding was that although use have lost 1 launcher hardpoint, the increase to the damage bonus actually increases the raw dps potential of the ship. Would need to double check myself, but from what ive read on test server feed back forum people are saying they are getting an increase |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
380
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:53:00 -
[106] - Quote
Lysa Riay wrote:An option to dispose of the vomit inducing camera shake would be nice! it doesnt even scale as you zoom out...#  being adjusted to differing sensory input is a good start. Or are you going to refuse your VR headset soon?
Also you could try not being shot. If you kill them before they launch no shake for you.
Options general camera shake. |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:54:00 -
[107] - Quote
Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1
Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke.
http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
981
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:56:00 -
[108] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp
Being out of balance is, by definition, broken when you consider the context. Just because you don't like the fix doesn't mean it wasn't needed. The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3968
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:00:00 -
[109] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Nadzieijko Andrastile
Intentionally Dense Angeli Mortis
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:12:00 -
[110] - Quote
If you actually do the math, you'll see a more level playing field than before. It's really not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be. They took away what you knew, now you need to think of a new way to fit your ship, or just wait for someone to make a new cookie cutter fit.
Pitting several high SP accounts against each other in newly modified battlecruisers has been more fun and actually provides a challenge. Sorry you can't bring your Drake to everything. |
|

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:16:00 -
[111] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining.
That's not the point. I don't want to be forced to use only a certain type ship to do what i need to at that time. The thing that brought me to this game ( years ago ) was the fact that so many options are available on so many ships that you could outfit to your liking. The whole curtailed and role set mindset that all these mmo's are taking as of late is just bad business for us, good for them. As people would just be able to hurry look up the best outfit and just get that then doing research and outfitting to there need for what they are doing. People are slowly being forced to use only a certain type setup to be-able to compete with other setups or you are left behind if you choose not to use that certain setup. I am not going to get into the argument about how this ship is better or that can be better if you do that, that is the whole point for having options so you can choose for yourself what you think is better, even if others think it's not. Not pre ordained rules. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Rasmier
Endless Winter Night R O G U E
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining.
It's offical now....CCP hates caldari pilots |

Amaloy Jeqcovy
Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:20:00 -
[113] - Quote
With all the rebalancing, I am leaving. It feels like CCP is balancing the game so that frigates can take out BC's much easier. Is this game going the same direction as WoW in that regard?
I don't want the game too balanced. Why not just make one ship, one gun? Now that's balance. It is not, however, what gamers want in a game. Some gamers want to be able to find a few BFG's, while others like pistols. When gamers put a lot of time and money (this is a paid subscription game) into achieving a ship and fit, it is repulsive to log in to find that fitting is no longer valid and can no longer be hoped for.
I don't pay for games that let me acquire something through large effort just to have it taken permanently away. Because of this, the most enjoyable aspect of the game is social - and that's not enough to keep me here. Especially in a game that tries to fix things that aren't broken, and ignores the things that are (example: POS management). |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3969
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:20:00 -
[114] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining. That's not the point. I don't want to be forced to use only a certain type ship to do what i need to at that time. The thing that brought me to this game ( years ago ) was the fact that so many options are available on so many ships that you could outfit to your liking. The whole curtailed and role set mindset that all these mmo's are taking as of late is just bad business for us, good for them. As people would just be able to hurry look up the best outfit and just get that then doing research and outfitting to there need for what they are doing. People are slowly being forced to use only a certain type setup to be-able to compete with other setups or you are left behind if you choose not to use that certain setup. I am not going to get into the argument about how this ship is better or that can be better if you do that, that is the whole point for having options so you can choose for yourself what you think is better, even if others think it's not. Not pre ordained rules. All ships are have always been made for specific roles, these rules are simply being made more defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. You still have plenty of options. In fact you have more options than you did before. You seem to be complaining that one ship can do slightly less than it could before... well that ship WAS broken. Get over it. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3969
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:21:00 -
[115] - Quote
Amaloy Jeqcovy wrote:With all the rebalancing, I am leaving. Nobody cares. Especially since you apparently don't understand how the rebalancing works at all. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
395
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:24:00 -
[116] - Quote
Lord Thingol wrote:Because I can say with full awarness, that Caldari is the worst race for PVP today.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=top20
3 Caldari ships in top 4. 4 Caldari ships in top 6. |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:25:00 -
[117] - Quote
Nadzieijko Andrastile wrote:If you actually do the math, you'll see a more level playing field than before. It's really not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be. They took away what you knew, now you need to think of a new way to fit your ship, or just wait for someone to make a new cookie cutter fit.
Pitting several high SP accounts against each other in newly modified battlecruisers has been more fun and actually provides a challenge. Sorry you can't bring your Drake to everything.
Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3970
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:26:00 -
[118] - Quote
Naga #1 Rokh #3 Caracal #4 Drake #6 Yep, Caldari is definitely worst for PVP. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3970
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:27:00 -
[119] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:Nadzieijko Andrastile wrote:If you actually do the math, you'll see a more level playing field than before. It's really not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be. They took away what you knew, now you need to think of a new way to fit your ship, or just wait for someone to make a new cookie cutter fit.
Pitting several high SP accounts against each other in newly modified battlecruisers has been more fun and actually provides a challenge. Sorry you can't bring your Drake to everything. Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself. No, this isn't what's happening. Read what I said earlier. Malcanis for CSM 8 Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm |

Reiken VonPain
Nation of Epson
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:30:00 -
[120] - Quote
I do like the Idea of rebalancing the battle cruisers and i don't have any issues with it except one. The drake, why'd ya have to take away a missile hard point? that'll make missioning and PVP harder. I don't think the change from 5% to 10% missile kinetic damage bonus makes up for the DPS of an extra missile launcher. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 22 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |